Auditors Asked the IRS To Figure Out Why So Many Taxpayers Make Mistakes. The IRS Said 'No.'
Maybe taxpayers would make fewer mistakes if the federal tax code weren't so hopelessly complex.

As many Americans who waited until the last minute will likely rediscover this weekend, filing federal taxes is a complicated and frustrating task. No matter how much care is taken, mistakes happen—and fairly often.
During the 2021 tax filing season, for example, the IRS "suspended and reviewed 35 million returns with errors," according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which annually reviews the IRS' performance and makes recommendations for improvement.
Those errors can be the result of taxpayers failing to include a necessary form or complete information, though they can also be the results of mistakes by IRS employees, the GAO reported. In either case, they cause long delays in getting refunds to taxpayers and are a costly strain on the IRS itself—during the 2021 filing year, IRS employees worked 10 hours of overtime per week for several months to deal with a backlog of incorrect tax returns.
There was a significant increase in the number of errors found by the IRS in 2021, which the GAO attributed to taxpayers being confused about how to report aid received during the COVID-19 pandemic, but more than 15 million returns have been flagged for errors in other recent years.
This is a persistent issue for the IRS, but the GAO's audit found that the tax agency "does not have a process to identify and analyze their underlying causes. This limits IRS's ability to reduce instances of recurring errors and anticipate potential future problems."
Until the IRS has such a system in place, the GAO warned, "taxpayers will continue to experience delayed returns and refunds," and the "IRS risks creating a perpetual backlog of work that will be difficult to address before the start of the next filing season."
The IRS' response: nah.
In a written response to the GAO, IRS Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement Douglas O'Donnell rejected the recommendation to study frequently occurring tax errors because the agency already has a "robust" system in place to track and identify errors. O'Donnell added that further study of this problem would be redundant.
In its own response, the GAO disputed the notion that the IRS' current system is robust—and, based on the numbers, it's also clearly not very effective. The IRS provided no evidence, the GAO concluded, that its existing processes "have contributed to lower error rates for certain errors."
If only the IRS had just gotten $80 billion in new funding that could be used to better understand why so many taxpayers struggle to file without making mistakes.
Instead, much of that new funding will beef up the agency's auditing powers. In other words: Rather than helping taxpayers make fewer mistakes when they file, the IRS will have an opportunity to turn innocuous mistakes into much bigger headaches.
"Congress should override the IRS' disagreement with this key recommendation, and require a multi-year study on the main causes for taxpayer errors while filing," said Andrew Lautz, director of federal policy for the National Taxpayers Union, a free market group that advocates for lower, fairer taxes. "More importantly, Congress should carefully consider the results of such a study, and then even more carefully consider expanding the agency's authority to make corrections for certain common errors on a case-by-case basis—so long as taxpayers have reasonable courses to appeal or protest an IRS correction made on their behalf."
While it's at it, Congress should also think about reducing the overall complexity of the tax code so that Americans can file their taxes without needing the costly assistance of accountants or services like H&R Block.
Whether any further action is taken or not, the IRS' refusal to even consider further reviews of common mistakes provides a tidy illustration of a key difference between government and private sector business. If a business's customers are confused by a poorly designed website or an overly complicated order form, they might spend their money elsewhere. A business has a clear incentive to reduce its clients' mistakes, which might be costly and time-consuming to fix even if they don't drive customers away.
The IRS has none of those incentives, and its customer service will always lag because, well, none of us are really customers.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
One way to free up a bunch of money for error correction is to get rid of the guns. In the event a firearm is actually necessary, take along a federal marshal.
I would say more but the fear of the IRS and what it can and will do to anyone who stands in their way is very real. Why does an accountant need to carry a gun?
Yes. The EPA, IRS, dept of education, & many others should have their armed divisions removed. Calls for assistance can be made when necessary
“Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against. We're after power and we mean it. There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with.”
Well certainly, they've been doing it to minorities for decades in some parts of the country.
Who is John Gault?
Yes! Well said, Ayn. A statist apologist would block his mind from "understanding", Ayn, use "willful blindness". Those statists who don't block it, and feel completely in control, safe, untouchable, may even confess to the scheme, the fraud, the lies, and smile, confident that force trumps reason, rights, decency.
Well said
Congress should also think about reducing the overall complexity of the tax code so that Americans can file their taxes without needing the costly assistance of accountants or services
I once asked my congresscreature why -- decade after decade --'everyone' agrees the tax code is broken, yet it never gets fixed.
His literal answer: 'Washington DC is a complicated place.'
If the question about any government function starts with "why", the answer is always "money".
I am making a real GOOD MONEY (400£ to 500£ / hr )online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly 30k£, this online work is simple and straightforward, don't have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. At that point this work opportunity is for you.if you interested.simply give it a shot on the accompanying site....Simply go to the BELOW SITE and start your work....★★
SITE. ——>>> DOLLARPAY.COM
For the DC crowd the complexity is a feature not a bug.
Congress is in the business of selling tax breaks and regulatory favors to corporate lobbyists. If they simplified the tax code, they would be giving away a major part of their business.
You said it. And while I am not a both sides apologist, in this case it really is all sides of the political spectrum.
One of those cases where 99% of them make the others look bad.
Maybe taxpayers would make fewer mistakes if the federal tax weren't.
FIFY-sorta
Why would an agency that collects fines what to make it harder to impose fines?
"Maybe taxpayers would make fewer mistakes if the federal tax code weren't so hopelessly complex."
Oh, that's rich. Does anyone honestly believe that our government actually gives a flying fuck about any of its citizens?
It is the people we elect who created this mess. The Trump tax scam was one of the worst laws ever pass. Similarly the Bush tax cuts. Christmas for every special interest.
Democrats differ in magnitude not in principle.
This is the first year I did not mail in my tax forms. I used the fillable forms and sent them in electronically. Overall, I liked the forms and noted that they did the math so I did not need to do a double check. Some things are stupid, for example I had to copy data from my W2 and 1099R forms to their fillable form. I don't know why as I assume the IRS has a copy. I would also like to see the calculation work sheets automated. Finally, I wonder why the US government pays me 100% of my SS and then taxes 85% of the amount. Could they not just figure out the tax amount and then just pay me the amount less taxes. It makes more sense than paying me then having me send a part back.
Once again, the IRS is the scapegoat not the culprit, that is Congress.
My first thought was, "Oh, goodie! The IRS has made it easier for you to make mistakes on your tax form!" My second thought was, "Moderation4ever is only about fifteen years behind the rest of the nation technologically."
I have just received my 3rd Online paycheck of $28850 which i have made just bydoing very simple and easy job Online. This Online job is amazing and regularearning from this are just awesome. Now every person can get this home job andstart making extra dollars Online by follow details mentioned on this webpage…………
SITE. ——>>> https://t.ly/FLJD
You are correct that I am behind the times in that I don't use a service or tax software. On the other hand, I am the person who gets tax questions from friend and relatives because I read the instruction and know the answer to the obscure.
Right.
I am the same way. My brother is a tax attorney and CPA and only twice in my life have I ever had to ask him a tax question.
Um, Congress bears responsibility, but so does the IRS.
So why does the IRS get all the anger and blame and Congress gets little or none?
Why? 'Cos fuck 'em, that's why.
As intended.
"and require a multi-year study" LOL. How many $$$ will that cost?
I am making a real GOOD MONEY (400£ to 500£ / hr )online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly 30k£, this online work is simple and straightforward, don't have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. At that point this work opportunity is for you.if you interested.simply give it a shot on the accompanying site....Simply go to the BELOW SITE and start your work....★★
DOLLARPAY.COM
Do you really expect that a Government Agency, with the majority of their employees belonging to Public Sector Unions, would do anything to make things easier, with the possibility of some of those employees being no longer needed?
I have just received my 3rd Online paycheck of $28850 which i have made just bydoing very simple and easy job Online. This Online job is amazing and regularearning from this are just awesome. Now every person can get this home job andstart making extra dollars Online by follow details mentioned on this webpage…………
SITE. ——>>> https://t.ly/FLJD
Especially when those employees are disproportionately women and racial minorities, many of whom would be unlikely to find jobs with equivalent pay and status in the private sector.
The IRS did not write the tax laws. The people elected did.
The irony of a government agency which shouldn't exist trying to audit another government agency which shouldn't exist...
The IRS can collect billions on interest and penalties on mistakes, especially if they wait a long time to "catch" people . Why would they change that?
I'm arguably a left of center libertarian. I want a government that can keep check on the Elon Musk's, Bill Gates', The Harlan Crow's & The George Soros' of the country. I'd also approve of a government that tries to prevent toxic dumps in poor people's backyard's etc. I understand that the classic libertarian position of "harm caused" to be addressed in the courts is ineffective in this world of "Goliath's" with very few able to play the role of a "David."
All that being said, I believe a "flat tax" could be both simple yet fair. Of course, the devil is always in the details.
My suggested details:
All income is taxed regardless of source. Dividend income should not be taxed at the point of distribution but at the point of reception. The company paying the dividend doesn't get to keep the money so why should they be taxed?
Everybody gets a standard deduction. Perhaps $10k for adults in the household, $5k for the first child, & phased out by the 4th child.
This would be much simpler & yet fair to lower income people who put virtually all of their money back in to the economy anyway.
Govt is responsible for a lot of pollution, and reason has been on the case for a long time.
https://reason.com/1981/02/01/love-canal/
I call BS. Make all taxes a register tax only. Cap state and federal combined at no more than X% (19% is the absolute maximum however food, medical, and some other items would not be taxed at all and includes all corporate tax paid on products one purchases, meaning corporations pay a lower amount. It might look like, 3% corporate tax on all money spent, then something like 12% on the citizen money spent, that would probably equal 19% total) . Give a tax credit for basic clothing allowance per capita of a say the tax on 500 hundred a year. The government would send a check to each person for whatever allowances there are. End all property taxes and all other taxes (except maybe unemployment etc which are insurance premiums).
Bottom line, if you do not spend your money, there is no tax. If you spend it, it is taxed. Then there needs to be some tax on money removed from the USA by any person. Example, Jose sends $1000 to his mother in Mexico....it needs to be taxed at the full amount before being sent.
Vacations, the same way. You spend money overseas and you are charge tax on the money. When you return, any unused fund are tax refunded and a certain percentage of the difference is refunded because of foreign taxes. Too simple.
Why 19%? because every nation, even the most powerful thought history have expanded and become great powers, until total taxation reached 19%. Then the entire country fell.
"I’m arguably a left of center libertarian" (then proceeds to list a bunch of opinions that aren't even remotely libertarian.)
the tax code is a joke.
my wife and I are retired. Our income is from dividend paying stocks and some selling of covered calls for extra income. This year my tax return, like usual, was only 52 pages this year with solidly over a dozen forms for the feds and about the same just over a dozen for the state.
The time that is wasted by me doing the prep to then give the pile of documents over to the CPA that then has to plow time into it is such a HUGE waste of resources.
Imagine if that time for all tax payers and companies could be put to use....you know....making products and services, working on R&R, etc.
Get rid of all income taxes and just have a flat 15% sales tax on all new goods purchases with exemptions for groceries and other basic survival needs so you aren't hitting the poor or low income as hard.
There shouldn't be an IRS that costs $15 billion per year in order to collect taxes. A simple sales tax of 15%. That also makes it nearly impossible for people to avoid it, thus criminals pay it. People that currently operate on cash only businesses or that want to use crypto to escape taxes, etc. cannot just escape taxes so easily.
Fairness is more than dealt with by having the flat sales tax on new goods only while exempting groceries and other basic necessities that will have to be figured out, i.e. you can't just exempt clothing as someone might struggle to buy a couple pairs of $20 jeans and pay no tax but the rich person buying $400 jeans shouldn't be a tax free purchase as that is clearly not a need but the $20 jeans for the low earner is a need.
As long as that 15% is state local and federal taxes combined and as long as corporations pay a lower amount. Otherwise the people will pay inflated prices for products creating a net benefit for the government., The total taxation through the system can not exceed 19%, including the final user and must include state and federal taxes. Pretty simple.
Well you can pull that off if you abolish Social Security, Medicsre, and the US military.
Only one of which is explicitly mentioned in the Constitution as a power of the federal government.
People buying stolen goods won't pay sales tax, so the mobs of shoplifters supplying the counter-economy won't be out of pocket.
Some states that exempt clothing have a threshold of a certain # amount per piece. Some clothing required by your job: those steel-toed shoes the factory or jobsite demands you wear.
What good is an audit if you don't listen to the auditors?
The audit was unsolicited.
The IRS already knows what you owe, they should just send you a bill at the end of the year. And you would only have to file if they made a mistake.
Actually, there should be an alternative maximum tax. With 200M taxpayers and 4 trillion in taxes extracted, once you've paid 20K you shouldn't have to explain anything at all. Then you'd only have to file if you wanted some of your 20K back and could show the deductions for it.
Your Armed-Theft judgement.
Will you be a Gov-Gun chosen winner or loser in this game?
Please answer 1M questions and find out.....
Maybe Gov-Guns shouldn't be choosing the 'winners' and the 'losers' and should be taxing appropriated. (i.e. equally). Think that word is even used in the US Constitution. And if you cannot pay for your 'fair share' you can visit the local welfare office.
Why would the IRS reduce its workload? It'd lead to a smaller IRS Budget and fewer IRS workers. Who at the IRS wants that? The IRS is incentivized to cause people to make mistakes!
Want to reduce mistakes? Setup a separate group to figure it out and pay them based on the reduction in errors.
"The IRS has none of those incentives, and its customer service will always lag because, well, none of us are really customers."
Quite correct: Not the customers, "we" are the once-removed owners of the IRS. Until we elect representatives who order the IRS to implement the auditor's recommendation(s), the IRS will not change.
As Pogo said, "We have met the enemy and he is us."
Why does the "capitalist" USA even have a Marxist income tax? The 2nd plank of the Communist Manifesto is the graduated income tax. In a free market economy, where people aren't slaves of government, workers KEEP their money. We've become a nation of tax slaves, gradually accepting this situation as the government grew over the last 100 years. Now we have been conditioned to think the government automatically owns a certain percentage of our productive output.
The IRS doesn't write the tax code. Congress does, God help us all (including the IRS).
The IRS said NO because the current system is confusing by design. The Federal Government needs a flexible income taxation system so that it can always come out on teh winning side while the citizen is always the criminal. Of course they don't want it fixed.
The IRS probably already knows why the tax forms are so confusing: Because the tax laws passed by Congress are confusing, and that's because Congress wants to be able to sell tax breaks without their constituents figuring out what's going on.
Since the feds can create "money" from nothing, let them create all the "money" they need to run the federal government each year. That way they get the "money" they want and the people pay no federal taxes.
"But ewwwwwww, inflation!" you say. It's all promises, smoke and mirrors and funny money anyway, who's to say just printing the money is any worse than what we are doing now, which is just.....uh...printing the money anyway.
Jeez, they don't even print that much money anymore----that guy Bob who works in the fifth sub-basement level at the Treasury just punches in whatever number his boss tells him and POOF we got us an extra 6 trillion COVID dollars.
Spambots?
I even have made $17,180 only in 30 days straightforwardly working a few easy tasks through my PC. Just when I have lost my office position, I was so perturbed but at last I’ve found this simple on-line employment & this way I could collect thousands simply from home. Any individual can try this best job and get more money online going this article…..
.
.
This Website➤—————————————-➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> GOOGLE WORK