Texas Man Files Wrongful Death Lawsuit Against Friends Who Helped His Ex-Wife Obtain an Abortion
"I know either way he will use it against me.... And after the fact, I know he will try to act like he has some right to the decision," said the woman in text messages to her friends named as defendants in the suit.

In Texas, a man filed a wrongful death lawsuit last week against three women who helped his ex-wife obtain abortion pills. In what is possibly the first lawsuit of its kind, the legal action realizes many of abortion advocates' fears—demonstrating the potential of civil suits to be brought against women seeking abortions and those who wish to help them.
Last Thursday, Marcus Silva filed a lawsuit against three of his ex-wife's friends, alleging that they helped her obtain abortion pills last July. The suit also claims that the manufacturer of the pills is liable and states that it will be added as a defendant once it is identified. Silva seeks over $1 million in damages for the "wrongful death" of his and his ex-wife Brittni's "unborn child." The lawsuit was filed just one month after the couple divorced.
Abortion is illegal in Texas, with a narrow exception for abortions performed in a "medical emergency."
The lawsuit contains excerpts from text messages between Silva's ex-wife and two of the defendants, Jackie Noyola and Amy Carpenter. In the messages—which appear to be crudely captured photos of Brittni Silva's phone screen—Brittni and her friends plan to obtain abortion pills.
"Ohhhh ok no so we have pills here in Houston," Noyola texted the group. "So no you wouldn't have to fly. You could get them from us or your could order some online but they're expensive and I think take maybe a week or 2 to get here."
Later, the group discussed when Silva would take the pills. "Do it over the weekend…. Have a heavy period and stay in bed," Carpenter wrote.
A third defendant, Aracely Garcia, was not included in the group text but was named in the suit for allegedly providing Noyola with the pills.
"Each of the five elements of a civil conspiracy is present. Noyola and Garcia combined to accomplish the object of murdering an unborn child with abortion pills, and there was a meeting of the minds on that course of action," the complaint states. "Jackie Noyola took at least one overt act in pursuance of that objective by obtaining the abortion pills and delivering them to Brittni Silva, which resulted in damages when baby Silva was murdered."
While wrongful death suits relating to abortions have been filed before, they have typically been against abortion clinics or physicians performing the procedure. However, because the abortion in this case was the result of medication taken at home, Silva is suing those who helped his ex-wife obtain the pills. He is not pursuing legal action against his ex-wife, as women who obtain abortions are exempt from civil and criminal liability in Texas.
Abortion rights groups have framed the suit as the inevitable result of strict anti-abortion laws. "We are outraged, but we are not surprised. It has been clear for years that anti-abortion extremists plan to use the judicial system as an instrument of fear and intimidation," said Wendy Davis, a Senior Advisor for Planned Parenthood Texas Votes in a statement last Friday. "No one should face fear or the threat of prosecution when seeking reproductive health care."
It is unclear whether this lawsuit will succeed—primarily because the concept is seemingly untested. While one Texas physician was sued in 2021 for violating Texas' then-six-week abortion ban, the suit was dismissed last year after the plaintiff was found to not have standing. It's unclear how this precedent would apply in this case where the fetus' father is suing.
Even if the suit is ultimately dismissed, this lawsuit shows how the law can be wielded to intimidate—and possibly extract monetary damages—from those who help women obtain abortions.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good for him.
Judgement should be in his favor.
Yeah. If he stealthed her and got her pregnant he'd be up on rape charges, but she got pregnant, concealed it, and divorced him.
The typical "If we can wield pregnancies *and* abortions against ex-husbands, then we aren't truly equal! BOAF SIDEZ!" idiocy.
I’m paid $185 per hour to complete the task using an Apple laptop. I absolutely didn’t think it was conceivable, but my dependable buddy convinced me to give this straightforward an03 chance a go after she made $26,547 in just 4 weeks working on it. Visit the following page to find out additional
.
.
instructions————>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
Was it his kid? Camp doesn't even address that. I think they were already divorced when she killed the child.
If they were still married, he has every reason to sue. Abortion is killing a human being and outside of rape, incest, or the mom's health it is illegal in Texas. Accept it woke woman. Also accept kids are not transgender. While you want to be the "cool" white suburban mom with a trans kid, don't go there.
And how often have you railed against the injustice of women slapping men with child support, even for children that aren't theirs? Seems about right if women get to claim child support then men should be allowed to claim wrongful death on the flip side.
Or is this another heads I win tails you lose situation that the leftist twat Emna is defending.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://autoincome66.pages.dev
"Seems about right if women get to claim child support then men should be allowed to claim wrongful death on the flip side."
This seems fair to me.
If the mother had decided to keep the kid against the father's wishes, would the father have been on the hook for child support? I'm sure we all know the answer to that, which indicates there's more than one person involved in the decision.
Good for him. I hope she rots in jail like anyone else who murdered their kids.
Not nearly as long, but the friends too.
Kinda coincidental, but it I just pulled up the end of Falling Down on the other thread and it feels exceedingly relevant for pretty much the same reason:
Yes, divorce is terrible and yes you should support your friend but you made a conscious effort to get involved in a divorce which isn't yours to intervene in and you broke the law and terminated a life in the process. You are not a good person.
Yep, that looks like murder to me. An entire living human being was killed on purpose by other humans.
"this lawsuit shows how the law can be wielded to intimidate—and possibly extract monetary damages—from those who help women obtain abortions."
You meant to say "obtain murder".
“An entire living human being”
Maybe. Would be informative to know at which week she was at in the pregnancy.
How old are you, Mike? 66 or 67? Because your humanity and right to exist is very much related to your age.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link---------------------------------------------->>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
In Texas, which week of gestation is irrelevant.
Are we not men? We are devolving! Devolving into elephant-seal-like harem-fighting beasts, fighting over which "Lying Lothario" can fight and lie over the babes the best! And no one will bother to try and be a good father any more! And the already-born young get trampled and trumpled underfoot and underfin, during the fighting!
http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/#_Toc117957741
THE “LYING LOTHARIO” PROBLEM: Well, a lot of pro-lifers are men, and I would bet that even those pro-lifers who are women? Very few of them have found themselves in the following shoes: Lying Lothario endlessly says “Love ya, babe, Love-ya, Love-ya, Love-ya, NOW can I get down your pants?” After she falls for him and he gets her pregnant, the abuse (from him) begins, and she finds out that he has 7 other “Love-ya, Babe, my One and Only” babes on the side, 4 of them also pregnant by him! So abortion is “veto power” against scumbucket men. If these behavioral genes get passed on and on, humans will evolve into something like elephant seals, where the men most skilled at lying and fighting off the other lying men, get a harem of 40 babes, and the rest of the men get nothing (other than caring for the resulting babies)! So abortion is empowering women to fight off this sort of thing… And reserve their baby-making powers for men who are less lying scum, and will actually make good fathers to the children.
So they want to “capitally punish” the “offenders” (abortion-providing doctors, so as to “dry up” the sources for safe abortions), while they have never been in the above-described (lied-to female) shoes! Willfully blind self-righteousness, basically…
Or maybe some of the anti-abortion men fantasize and lust after being the elephant-seal-like men who can gather the baby-making powers of a harem of 40 lied-to women, under the new scheme of things?
And more...
Sqrlsy the babykiller thinks the child should pay because dad's a rakehell.
Marxist Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer wants to gather a harem of 40 or so lied-to babes, knock them all up with Her Perfect Clitoris (unbeknownst to each other), and pollute the gene pool with irresponsibility and shitty (if any) parenting! Responsible non-lying parents? Who needs THEM or their genes anyway?
See? Sqrlsy the babykiller thinks the child should pay because dad’s a rakehell.
See? Marxist Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer wants humans to devolve into elephant-seal-like, irresponsible, harem-fighting BEASTS!!! By Marxist Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer… Barbarism that can NOT be beaten-beasts… Except if authorized by Authoritarian Marxist Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer!!!
(That is, Marxist Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer thinks that humans should devolve, and PAY AND PAY AND PAY, 'cause Marxist Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer is a wild-seeding, irresponsible clitoris-waving rakehell!!!!)
That's one hell of a word salad. Not sure what you're trying to say.
Let's start again, is murder wrong?
Props for rakehell...
rakehell
rāk′hĕl″
noun
An immoral or dissolute man.An abandoned fellow; a wicked wretch; especially, a dissolute fellow; a rake.A lewd, dissolute fellow; a debauchee; a rake.
knowingly violating civil statutes is knowingly violating civil statutes. jury can decide.
I started earning $350/hour in my free time by completing tasks with my laptop that i got from this company I stumbled upon online…Check it out, and start earning yourself . for more info visit any tab this site
Thanks a lot Here……………….>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
Ah, Texas, turning women into baby-mills.
Pretty sure nature did that, but keep worshipping government if you want.
Keeping Government Almighty OUT of our collective wombs and decision-making is now worshitting Government Almighty? Have you ever heard of having, and USING, a thing called "brains"?
"...keep worshipping government if you want."
You know Nardz, it seems to me that the recently-divorced man in this tale is the one running to the government for help. Personally, I am more of an ancap.
>>for help
vengeance?
"vengeance" ... did occur to me as a motive.
"Personally, I am more of an ancap."
Yet you attribute responsibility for pregnancy to government
In a "limited government" scenario wouldn't the State have a role in adjudicating disputes between two parties?
Unless you're an anarchist, yes.
I was more commenting on the attribution of cause being the state according to J'sG
The only party who is harmed is the fetus who is not a party in the lawsuit
So the consequences of sex are unknowable to women? Seems a bit misogynistic, but that is the proggy way.
So the consequences of eating sugar and NOT brushing your collectively owned teeth are UNKNOWN to the proles??!
Yes, Mother Nature and-or God have designed nature and our bodies such that too much sugar-eating (and then not brushing your teeth) causes cavities, bearing living bacteria! So the wanton killing of teeth bacteria caused by YOUR irresponsibility should be PUNISHED by denying you access to dentists, and possibly also meting out “capital punishment” to murderous dentists!!! Ye have SINNED, by eating TOO much sugar!!!
So, at least, say those with near-infinite LUSTS for PUNISHMENTS!!!
Murdering plants and animals DELIBERATELY in order to EAT them stops beating hearts and flowing sap!!! STOPPING this utter MADNESS remains essential to establishing the universality of living-being rights!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jain_vegetarianism … Jain vegetarianism is the Truth and The Way!!! Eat ONLY fruits that have fallen from the tree, lest ye HURT the tree during the picking of the fruit! And do NOT eat the seeds! Eating seeds prevents new plants from being born!
(All of this deep disrespect for universal LIFE inherent in ALL belief systems excluding strict Jain vegetarianism is the root cause of ALL human evils, including genocide, bad haircuts, torture-rape, sloppy housekeeping, and necrophilia!)
NOTHING will get us there (to PROPER life-respect), short of the absolute worshit, not only of recently-fartilized egg smells, but also, of ALL living beings!!! From the cited article about the Jains and their MUCH higher standards than the rest of us, see…
“Strict Jains do not consume food that has been stored overnight, as it possesses a higher concentration of micro-organisms (for example, bacteria, yeast etc.) as compared to food prepared and consumed the same day.”
Bacteria have feelings and rights too, ya know!!!
As you can all see, Sqrlsy isn't big on biology and medical science.
Ass y'all can see, Marxist Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer isn't very keen on understanding Her Own Perfectly Ridiculously Self-Righteous Lusts for turning humans into behaviorally devolved elephant-seal-like harem-fighting-and-lying BEASTY BOY-TOYS!!!
No one is saying the collective own women’s wombs. They’re saying the baby that was voluntarily put there does.
Technically one could argue that the placental sac IS the fetus’, lending at least some credence to TJJ’s evictionism ideas.
I mean, the guy also knew the consequences of sex: the woman might abort a fetus if she doesn't want to have a baby with him.
Well Elon says we need more people. Woman are evolved to have many kids...and they should. Stay home and have babies and be the mom. 10,000 years of civilization can't be wrong.
As he is no longer married to her, he has no standing to file suit.
If the kid was his, he has legal standing I would think. But maybe it wasn’t ? Difficult to prove now.
if there was baby when there was marriage it may be community property.
This will be an interesting case if it gets to trial. Maybe they had an amiable divorce, but I am guessing that did not happen. He may think he is going to show the court who is the boss of the family, but that may not happen also.
"He may think he is going to show the court who is the boss of the family, but that may not happen also."
That sounds like a bizarre hypothetical on your part. Do you have any evidence to support this? Or is it just an ad hominem attack?
Right?
What kind of sick fuck sees this story and comes up with that as motive?
Leftists are literally, not figuratively, cancer.
#BREAKING: A Russian fighter jet has struck a USAF MQ-9 reaper drone over the Black Sea says the US Military
#UPDATE: The U.S. Air Force says a Russian aircraft acted in a "reckless, environmentally unsound and unprofessional manner" when it dumped fuel on an unmanned US Air Force drone and struck its propeller today, forcing it down over the Black Sea.
Yeah, I heard about this. A couple of gallons of unleaded thwarting a multi-million dollar drone..... the modern version of a Molotov Cocktail? Someone called this a "serious international incident." LOL. Yeah.
I'm surprised the Russians have been this careful in not targeting US assets in Ukraine or nearby that are passing intell to the Ukraines. We are at war with Russia, US contractors are manning Ukranian missile batteries and likely tanks and planes. Russia military might be considered a joke by neocons but in war you always take losses. A US Destroyer in the Black Sea hits a sea mine? the Russians will get lucky..the Vietnamese did, the North Koreans did, hell even the Iraqies did. Biden wants a way..only way to get rid of inflation...
Russia doesn't want direct conflict with the US/NATO.
This couldn't be more obvious.
The US has, and continues, committed dozens of acts of war over the last 13 months. Most of them blatantly and/or clumsily. At least once a week you have some dumb broad (like Lindsey Graham) from a NATO government saying we're at war with Russia, we must win the war with Russia, Putin has to be overthrown, etc.
Mucho cassus belli.
Yet Putin acts like Russia is only at war with Ukraine, without denying US/NATO involvement. He's limited combat to Ukrainian forces (who are definitely often foreigners) and infrastructure.
Why?
Much the same reason Trump told Iran "DON'T RETALIATE" when he obliterated Suleimani in Iraq:
There's no benefit to Russia of a wider war at the moment, much like Trump saw there was no benefit to war with Iran.
What's there to gain?
Russia is accomplishing its goals probably even better than expected. Putin doesn't want to possess western Ukraine- its utility is strictly as a borderland, thus buffer. Russia has established a line they've been fortifying that marks new borders, securing Crimea and the Donbass. Ukraine has lost the bulk of its fighting force, to the point they're kidnapping teens and elderly people off the streets and in their homes. Ukraine's and NATO's equipment and weapons stockpiles are utterly depleted.
Putin is so hated by the leaders of the "Liberal World Order" because he's much smarter than they are. He consistently refuses to defer to their rules, and he knows their rules very well.
He understands that the "democratic" west has to justify going full war, and he won't give them enough to do that because it's not in his/Russia's interest. I've been watching him frustrate the hell out of anglosphere politicians for years because he knows passive-aggressive assaults rely on the target to defeat itself by submitting, and he stymies them by simply refusing.
It's hilarious.
We could learn from Putin.
He's able to refuse their crybullying because he knows he's not guilty and that his opponents, and the arguments used against him/Russia, aren't in good faith. He has no delusions about that. Thus they're rendered largely impotent because they don't have the capacity of direct self assertion.
Meanwhile most commenters here still haven't learned that lesson, no matter how many times they get pissed on and told it's raining. We still see people arguing here about what Reason should write about, or pointing out leftist hypocrisy, or arguing the logical/scientific merits.
All that shit is incidental because the arguments put forth by Reason/chemjeff/Laursen/leftists aren't being made in good faith. They aren't representing themselves or their interests/concerns, in good faith.
The point is the accusation, in much the same way as "the process is the punishment".
You don't win by proving your point, you win by rejecting their legitimacy.
Feel free to make all the arguments you want, but the most appropriate response to someone like spb is: "Begone, pedo".
Stop pretending leftists are real people with legitimate desires or genuine concerns. They are not.
Of course blowing up Nord Stream was totally environmentally sound.
I started earning $350/hour in my free time by completing tasks with my laptop that i got from this company I stumbled upon online…Check it out, and start earning yourself . for more info visit any tab this site
Thanks a lot Here……………….>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
And after the fact, I know he will try to act like he has some right to the decision," said the woman in text messages to her friends named as defendants in the suit.
Choices all around.
What's Emma Camp's position on the popular, social term-of-art that started around the *checks notes* 90s (if I recall):
We're Pregnant
vs.
You're Pregnant
What is yours?
Yours is the choice of what to eat for breakfast (pending future changes by the Collective Will of Government Almighty, at least). A very few private choices MAY still remain, ass well. MAYBE!
NOT yours is the choice of who may, and who may NOT live, rent-free, in "your" collectively-owned womb!
You're pregnant.
That was then (men were men, women were women, end of story), this is now (too many options to count are too many options to count).
The science.
Only women get pregnant. Period. (yes, I did that)
The politics.
Women get to choose (absent rape), when they engage in unprotected sex). Part of that choice is possibly becoming pregnant.
The politics.
Men get to choose (absent rape), when they engage in unprotected sex. Part of that choice is possibly having a woman become pregnant and choose to abort.
He is not pursuing legal action against his ex-wife, as women who obtain abortions are exempt from civil and criminal liability in Texas.
IT'S TIME TO REVOKE QUALIFIED IMMUNITY!
Nice
Protection for Good Samaritan blocking and screening of offensive fetuses is the 5A of the reproductive system!
Just for expediency’s sake, tell the courts it wasn’t his baby and move for dismissal as he now lacks standing. What are they going to do ? Check DNA for something that happened a year ago ? No. Problem solved.
Secondly, I can’t believe this is a thing. Divorce your ex-husband ... again.
Thanks for proving once again proggies have no morality or conscience. BAMN seems to be the go to philosophy for you all.
Who's a prog ? I just hate legal stunts for the sake of pushing religious right agenda. This is a stupid case who's only purpose is to see how far they can get on this end-run around the law.
What religion was cited?
None, but all right thinking people know that the only reason people oppose abortion is because their sky daddy told them to.
Mother Earth keeps trying, but Sky Daddy won't let her abort us!
*mic drop*
They can still do a DNA test actually. Fetuses send stem cells throughout the mother's body during the entirety of pregnancy. They work to repair damaged tissues, and have even been found deep within bones. These stem cells are not from the mother's DNA, can be identified as from the fetus' DNA, and can stay in the mother's body for 30+ years or even for the rest of her life. This includes all pregnancies, even those lost to abortion or miscarriage, and scientists can determine how many pregnancies a woman has had just off these cells. These cells are different between each child too. This phenomenon is called fetal-maternal microchimerism, and this is one proven way that doctors determine whether the child will be male or female at birth.
*golf clap*
Just for expediency’s sake, tell the courts it wasn’t his baby and move for dismissal as he now lacks standing.
Belle, I 100% support your idea to testify under oath that you got pregnant by another man and chose to conceal it from your current husband. It’s a brilliant strategy that I'm sure will totally exonerate your friends when the other guy finds out you killed his baby. I wish you the best of luck in your divorce proceedings as well.
Remember "equal rights", as promoted in a proposed Constitutional amendment?
So if a sperm producer assaults a birthing person, as long as they/them want the baby, sperm daddy is on the hook for financial support. But if they/them wants to flush the cell clump, then daddy-o is SOL.
That would be the "We're pregnant/I'm pregnant" dichotomy.
"You're a man of strong principles... just... different ones at different times and different occasions... I like that in a man..."
Daddy-o needs to trick and deceive the MAXIMUM number of lied-to babes, under the "Lying Lothario" theorem!
http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/#_Toc117957741
Let us evolve (devolve) into harem-fighting BEASTS!!! To the BEST liars, go the genetic spoils! Already-born babies get to be trumpled underfoot, in the mating-rights, lying-rights fights!
THE “LYING LOTHARIO” PROBLEM: Well, a lot of pro-lifers are men, and I would bet that even those pro-lifers who are women? Very few of them have found themselves in the following shoes: Lying Lothario endlessly says “Love ya, babe, Love-ya, Love-ya, Love-ya, NOW can I get down your pants?” After she falls for him and he gets her pregnant, the abuse (from him) begins, and she finds out that he has 7 other “Love-ya, Babe, my One and Only” babes on the side, 4 of them also pregnant by him! So abortion is “veto power” against scumbucket men. If these behavioral genes get passed on and on, humans will evolve into something like elephant seals, where the men most skilled at lying and fighting off the other lying men, get a harem of 40 babes, and the rest of the men get nothing (other than caring for the resulting babies)! So abortion is empowering women to fight off this sort of thing… And reserve their baby-making powers for men who are less lying scum, and will actually make good fathers to the children.
So they want to “capitally punish” the “offenders” (abortion-providing doctors, so as to “dry up” the sources for safe abortions), while they have never been in the above-described (lied-to female) shoes! Willfully blind self-righteousness, basically…
Or maybe some of the anti-abortion men fantasize and lust after being the elephant-seal-like men who can gather the baby-making powers of a harem of 40 lied-to women, under the new scheme of things?
Pregnancy is inherently un-evenly burdensome upon the FEMALE (that's right , I said female) of the pairing; it was never going to be equal until our science gets advanced enough to put the burden of pregnancy either on the male or provide an alternative that is neither (artificial womb).
This is just science fact.
18 years of forced labor vs 9 months. Hmmmmm.
And?
You really don't have a point here.
You think you do, but you don't.
Might as well whine about the burden of having to continuously breathe or the sun coming up every day.
Two wrongs don’t make a right.
You’re using previous slave-the-male legislation to justify slave-the-female legislation. Instead of pushing for MORE, MORE, MORE Gov-Gun slavery; how about once the lawn company plants grass on your yard as requested; it’s your responsibility to mow it afterwards.
Female entitlement never had anything to do with equal rights as all BS “pity-me into Gov-Gun entitlement” [WE] identity-affiliation mobs proclaim. They are 100% the consequence of [WE] Gov-Gangster-Gun Democracy. The USA is a Constitutional Republic; not a democracy.. *Pretending* an entire new form of government will destroy (already is) this one.
Not sure why this is complicated to you.
If you, as a man, have vaginal intercourse with a woman, you're accepting that if there is a pregnancy that results, the woman gets the choice.
If you can't trust her to only make choices you approve of, then don't have sex with that woman.
And the bottom line is that regardless of what the law is, this is the case. Because abortion prohibition is about as successful as all forms of prohibition: makes it more dangerous, but doesn't make it go away.
So even if you're in the most "pro-life" state you can find, if you aren't comfortable letting a woman decide whether to carry your baby to term or aborting it, don't fuck that woman. Wait until you find one you trust.
In all fairness I think the ex-wife should return the man's sperm.. /s
Oh wait; Pretty sure he willingly gave that away on deposit.
Freak-en Indian Giver!
So... he should be allowed to kill her now?
If you cannot support ?baby? freedom.
UR supporting Gov-Gun Forced reproduction.
Let’s pretend that, instead of a baby, she secretly adopted a kitten or a puppy without telling him and, in the anxiety about the divorce and being burdened with a puppy or kitten to take care of, her and her friends decided to and then poisoned the puppy/kitty to death.
I think it’s pretty well known that I’m pretty solidly in the “Your animal, your property” camp. Hell, I don’t know for sure, but I’ve probably even coincidentally poisoned one or two animals to death with lead. But even I’ve got to raise my eyebrows and say “Holy Fuck!” at how cold and/or sociopathic that would be. And that’s just a dog/cat.
It’s not the Pro-Choice crowd trying to suffocate little kittens inside the ex-wife’s body now is it? Set the kittens FREE!!!!
Care to scrap up some more pathetic and entirely unrelated stories on your Gov-Gun obsessed Power-Mad trip?
The husband isn't trying to suffocate the little kitten, he wasn't even told. It was bought with his money or under a joint custody agreement with him without his consent and killed because she violated and/or voided the joint custody agreement and not just killed, but conspiratorially killed by her and her friends.
As I indicated, the wife comes home with a cat and they both agree to scald its fur off and bake it for dinner, I don't really give a shit about it, it's their cat. I can't count the number of nuisance cats I've killed. But getting a cat that you keep a secret until after your divorce so you can or so that you just wind up poisoning it? That's fucked up. Like spending alimony, not to put your kid through school, but to buy an expensive sports car and slash the tires.
Also, SQRLSY, using your own verbal ticks and retarded jargon across multiple accounts makes you seem more worthless than if you'd just confined it to the one account.
So the husband is demanding the cat be suffocated in her vagina against her wishes? Free the kittens!!!
Another rousing meeting of Libertarians For Statist Womb Management and Libertarians For Big-Government Micromanagement Of Ladyparts Clinics, convened at a site that attracts disaffected, on-the-spectrum, right-wing misfits and sponsored by Culture War Casualties Of America.
Carry on, clingers. So far as your betters permit. You get to whine about it as much as you like, of course. Until replacement.
It is quite hypocritical for the right to be lobbying for MORE, MORE, MORE Government when it comes to pregnancy healthcare isn’t it. Something about the road to hell paved in good intentions.