Electric Truck Manufacturer Featured in Super Bowl Ad Got $186 Million in Taxpayer Subsidies
Stellantis, one of the largest automakers on the planet with billions in cash on hand, got a generous handout from the state of Indiana for choosing to build its battery manufacturing plant there.

Over 100 million people watch the Super Bowl each year, more than any other single broadcast. Commercials that run during the game therefore command a high price: During this week's Super Bowl, a 30-second ad cost between $6 million and $7 million.
One 60-second spot titled "Premature Electrification" humorously addressed concerns about how far electric vehicles (E.V.s) can go between charges. In a parody of a pharmaceutical ad, actor Jason Jones spoke to viewers worried about being "unsatisfied" by an E.V. if it was "unable to last as long as you'd like." The solution: a Ram 1500 REV pickup truck, manufactured by Big Three automaker Stellantis (formerly Fiat Chrysler).
The all-electric version of the 40-year-old Ram will not be available until late next year, but it boasts of a 500-mile range between charges, which is currently unheard of for a truck. Its closest competitors, Rivian's R1T and Ford's F-150 Lightning, can each only go around 320 miles on a single charge.
It makes perfect sense for Stellantis, a company with a market cap currently valued over $50 billion, to shell out a few million bucks to promote its upcoming entrant into the high-tech electric vehicle market. What doesn't make sense is that some of those trucks will likely be made with considerable help from taxpayers.
In May 2022, the company announced a $2.5 billion joint development deal with Samsung SDI in which the companies would build an E.V. battery manufacturing facility in Kokomo, Indiana. The factory, which is expected to begin production in early 2025, will "supply battery modules for a range of vehicles produced at Stellantis' North American assembly plants."
That same day, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation (IEDC), a state development agency chaired by Gov. Eric Holcomb, committed to state incentives totaling over $186 million in grants, tax credits, and site preparation. The city and county also offered 100% property tax abatements worth up to $1.175 billion over 20 years.
The incentives seem to have made Indiana a more attractive location than Michigan, which a Stellantis executive said was "in play" earlier the same month.
While $186 million is a lot of money, it constitutes a small fraction of the $2.5 billion Stellantis and Samsung committed to the project and which over time could increase to more than $3 billion. It also pales in comparison to the €48.134 billion ($51.584 billion USD) that Stellantis reported in cash on hand in June 2022. For comparison, the state of Indiana's total expenditures in the 2021 fiscal year added up to $44.7 billion.
Unfortunately, offering taxpayer money to billion-dollar automakers is all too common. In October, Gov. Mike DeWine announced that Ohio would kick in $150 million toward a $4 billion Honda investment in E.V. factories. Last year, the state of Georgia committed as much as $1.5 billion in state incentives for a Rivian plant at a time when the company had $16 billion in cash.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I’m positive this will result in negative press for the battery manufacturer.
There's a potential for people to get charged up over this.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
But at least the coverage is electrifying.
zxv
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
This issue can be polarizing.
How re-volting.
It's shocking you would say such a thing.
Watt? Ampsolutely!
But it did spark a conversation
Such things tend to be draining.
Alternatively, it might generate potential resistance.
Watt did you say?
I re-coil from current affairs.
"Your distance may vary"
Yeah this 500-mile-range is likely to be just as much a line of bullshit as the F150's 320 mile range.
These ranges largely depend on city driving, and the benefits electric vehicles get from regenerative breaking and low-speed driving. But when you are towing a trailer on the highway- a use-case far more relevant to pickups- that range goes to shit. People have found the F150's range to be less than 100 miles when towing on the highway.
And that's if you don't run the heat.
Had a Tesla for an Uber ride a couple of weeks ago; first honest Tesla driver encountered.
Keep in mind that no one runs a gas tank until empty; we each have a comfort level. Unless I'm on a 'next gas station' signed road, 1/4 tank has me looking, but you and me can fill in 5 minutes and AAA can bring gas instead of a tow truck.
Not long after he got it, he went from somewhere on the peninsula to Tahoe. Stopped ~every hour for a 30-minute charge; he doesn't use that car for 200-mile trips anymore.
Went cross country in a Tesla two times. Gotta call bs on your story.
Are you the one that said it's not that bad if you've got the bladder of an 8 yr. old girl?
Because you aren't understanding the BS you're calling and it's obvious, Fanboi.
What?
obligatory Red Barchetta reference.
>>Stellantis (formerly Fiat Chrysler).
"dudes we need a pivot from Fix It Again Tony. ideas?"
Sham
Taxes
Everywhere
Leave
Libertarians
Angry
Not
Thrilled
It
Seems
OK, Joe, this is not atypical competition between states, counties, and municipalities to get a manufacturer to locate there. Granted, it's not great, but this is what they do.
Now, a better question is, "should communities compete or prostitute themselves for a manufacturer or other business?"
Lithium ion batteries aren't good enough and EVs are ridiculous toys for idiots who care nothing about the conditions in the African cobalt mines.
I do not care at all about the condition of mines anywhere.
If I think about it, I'd like them to be efficient and productive.
Enjoy your Tesla.
"...but it boasts of a 500-mile range between charges, which is currently unheard of for a truck. Its closest competitors, Rivian's R1T and Ford's F-150 Lightning, can each only go around 320 miles on a single charge."
I read a review of the Ford Lighting in Car and Driver. The Lightning is rated to tow 7500 lbs. C&D used a 6500 lbs trailer. The Lightning lasted 90 miles. EV PU's are not intended for work.
It can tow as rated, they didn’t say how far.
Who buys a pickup for work? If most of the trucks on the road today ever haul anything more than a few bags of groceries, I'd be amazed. Of course, why anyone needs a giant, ugly--ass truck to haul groceries is beyond me.
The ram electric truck will not be available until late 2024 at the earliest. Waste of advertising dollars.
There's some urban dwelling "cowboy" who's trying to preorder this monstrosity as we speak. Dude likely listens to Florida Georgia Line.
Florida Georgia Line
Worst fans ever. Truly the stupidest of society.
Waste of advertising dollars.
No it wasn't. Convinced the greenies to give $2.6B of other people's money to them. Just like Elon's free-charging for referrals Ponzi Scheme, it got a lot of customers to buy Teslas who otherwise wouldn't.
The all-electric version of the 40-year-old Ram will not be available until late next year, but it boasts of a 500-mile range between charges, which is currently unheard of for a truck. Its closest competitors, Rivian's R1T and Ford's F-150 Lightning, can each only go around 320 miles on a single charge.
One notable piece of genius business practice that Elon brought with him from his time in payment software is vaporware. Now, admittedly, if you're Ram or Ford and you promise an EV Ram or EV F-150 next year, you're going to have to produce and EV pickup at *some* point. But, again following Musk's lead, you can promise 5 min. battery swaps, a $30K sticker price on your coupe, a roadster model, a cyber truck, EV semis... whatever the hell you want the next couple years down the line and deliver fuck all next year.
Some things will always be just over the horizon. They include fusion power, intelligent AI, and practical electric vehicles.
Vaporware is always impressive
These things are clearly not ready for primetime and all of virtue signaling in the world won't change that. If the only driving you do is back and forth to the grocery store once a week an EV could be worth the investment. But they are clearly not suitable work trucks or for people who put significant miles on their vehicles. If I run out of gas I can get somebody to deliver 5 gallons and easily get to a gas station in most areas. If my battery goes dead I can get a jump start. Will tow trucks start carrying 440 volt inverters and sit on the shoulder for an hour charging these things? If you need to outrun a hurricane what happens if the grid goes down? Does anybody honestly believe that people North Dakota are going to drive around without heat in January? If and when these things actually perform as well as internal combustion vehicles with similar purchase and maintenance costs I might consider buying one. In the meantime I plan on burning hydrocarbons.
It’s not for everyone. Doesn’t mean it’s not for anyone.
We aren't having this discussion because anyone's on the verge of cramming the "not for anyone" position down anybody's throat. We're having this discussion because Indiana, of all fucking places, is fighting to give tax breaks... to make the batteries... of one of, if not the, keystone goods/technologies of the global ESG movement.
And, while I'm not saying you intentionally or knowingly did so, the conflation that we are is exceedingly disingenuous. Tesla didn't put charging stations in rural parts of MT or ID because they really want to clean up the polluted parts of rural MT. They put them there so the Tesla owners could feel smug lording their superiority over the plebs that they were/are benevolently bestowing ESG upon.
Obviously, Indiana should only subsidize companies in the verge of bankruptcy, right?
These electric pickups are mostly aimed at fleet sales I’m guessing, where they don’t drive long distances, and can recharge easily every night. You might also get a few douchebags who want to buy one to show off, but don’t have any real need for a pickup. Construction and heavy duty users will stick with ICE engines for the foreseeable future.
Elon to create an all electric bovine to be called the musk ox.
The musk ox would stink less than the cyber truck does.
Broaden it - in general these state subsidies, regardless of industry, are a bad thing. NFL teams themselves can be significant beneficiaries of such subsidies.
Sadly, this probably isn't Indiana's biggest boondoggle. If nothing else, there was Lucas Oil stadium. They just had to have a fancy retracting roof. Except they never open it, because the lights, speakers and video screens aren't weatherized. Genius!
No mention of the grotesque subsidies Elon Musk received?
Clingers gonna cling.
Partisans gonna hack.
Faux libertarian, right-wing assholes gonna continue to get stomped -- by their betters -- in the culture war.
Title correction; Democrats used Gov---> GUNS and STOLE $186M and gave it to their favorite manufacturer.
And the cherry on the top? Then they ran around accusing capitalism for being 'crony'. Coined the nickname 'crony capitalism' and remained completely ignorant that the very term was a contradiction of ideologies. It has and will always be 'crony socialism'.
I don't approve of this for one second, but it's not socialism. I really wish people would stop using words when they clearly don't know the meaning of those words.
It is socialism. The stepping stone towards communism. The ideology of "public" ownership. There is no self-interest in "publicly" funded manufacturing and there certainly is no "private property" when it's stolen by Gov-Guns.
Ref https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/398593-crony-capitalism-is-just-socialism-lite/
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM