Biden's Terrible Billionaire Tax
By raising the effective tax rate on capital gains, the proposal would reduce U.S. saving, discourage entrepreneurship, and decrease economic output.

Say what you will about the Biden administration's approach to tax-the-rich populism: It's creative. But creativity does not necessarily translate to sound tax policy.
At the State of the Union address, President Joe Biden reintroduced a proposal for a "billionaire minimum tax." Not to be confused with the global minimum tax (part of international negotiations at the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, or the OECD), the corporate book minimum tax (enacted in the Inflation Reduction Act last year), the individual alternative minimum tax (which has been law since 1969), or the old corporate alternative minimum tax (which was repealed in 2017), the billionaire minimum tax is relatively novel in terms of its design—but new doesn't mean sound either.
Currently, people pay taxes on gains in the value of an asset, like stock appreciation or the growth of a privately held business, when the asset is sold. If an asset is held for under a year, gains face ordinary income tax rates. If held for longer, gains face reduced rates, topping out at 23.8 percent. Deferral of capital gains taxes reduces the effective tax rate, and in some cases, capital gains tax liability can be completely avoided due to a provision that excludes capital gains at death.
Biden's proposal would tax unrealized gains—the increase in an asset's value, even before it's sold. Taxpayers with net wealth above $100 million would have to pay a minimum effective tax rate of 20 percent on an expanded measure of income that adds unrealized capital gains to more conventional sources of income, like wages, business income, and investment income. If ordinary taxes paid as a share of the expanded definition of income fell below 20 percent, the taxpayer would owe additional taxes to bring the rate up to 20 percent. Any additional taxes paid as part of the minimum tax would be treated as prepayments of future capital gains tax liability when gains are actually realized.
By raising the effective tax rate on capital gains, the proposal would reduce U.S. saving, discourage entrepreneurship, and decrease economic output.
The real risk to growth comes from raising taxes on the returns to risky investments: Investing in startups and new technologies that may provide huge returns—both socially in terms of innovation and productivity and privately for the investor—would be discouraged by higher taxes. Meanwhile, the tax burden would rise for domestic savers, but not for foreign savers, giving them a relative advantage. In response, domestic saving and income would fall, and foreigners would finance a greater share of U.S. investment opportunities, enjoying a greater share of the returns.
An annual tax on paper gains would be conspicuously complex. The largest administrative problems relate to valuing non-tradable assets like privately held businesses and taxing illiquid taxpayers with large gains on paper but little cash on hand to pay a minimum tax bill. The proposal attempts creative solutions, like formulaic rules and longer payment periods, but each would introduce new complexities, opportunities for tax planning, and the potential for disputes with the already-overwhelmed Internal Revenue Service.
Even with creative rules, the billionaire minimum tax could still result in the U.S. Treasury paying cash refunds to high-net-worth individuals in periods of high volatility. Notably, when the proposal was first introduced in October 2021, the stock market was at an all-time peak: Excluding a slight increase in December 2021, the S&P 500 has not reached that level since. At that time, the possible windfall of taxing all those paper gains looked tempting and lucrative, but since the stock market wilted in 2022, that is less appealing.
Given these problems, it's unsurprising the idea hasn't caught on around the world. As even prominent left-leaning advocates of taxing unrealized gains note in a paper last year, "No income tax system to date has been able to tax the full return on wealth which includes unrealized capital gains."
Almost every country taxes capital gains only when they are realized. Moreover, the U.S. policy of taxing long-term capital gains at a lower rate than ordinary income is common; most countries in the OECD tax capital gains at a reduced rate relative to the rate they tax ordinary income, as well as at a reduced rate relative to the U.S. capital gains rate.
Ultimately, the billionaire minimum tax is another manifestation of a disconnect between spending aspirations and tax philosophies.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Feature not a bug.
I’ve made $1250 so far this week working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’AM made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do, .for more information simply.
Open this link thank you……>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
Serious question, did Biden's SOTU really produce this much material to work off of?
It is the safe period between election cycles where Reason can pretend to be even about both sides. If there was an election year soon you wouldn't see this.
We still did get some “Biden just doing what Trump and the GOP did.”
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
On plenty of issues, that's actually true, which is why I find it alternately amusing and infuriating when TEAM red monkeys howl about how Biden is the worst ever or TEAM blue monkeys howl about how Trump was the worst ever and Biden is saving us all. The rhetoric may differ a lot, but when it comes to actual policies, you often need a magnifying glass to tell the difference. The biggest actual difference I can see is that Biden rolled back most of Trump's modest regulatory reforms. No one wanted to listen to me when I said this should have been done through legislation instead of executive orders. What the pen gives, the pen can take away.
Trump was facing an uphill battle between the insane democrat opposition, aided by never Trump trash. He did what he could. And where is this ‘Boaf sidez’ equivalency with the US being on the verge of WW3 with Russia? Or the border? Or the economy? Or the unprecedented totalitarianism coming from the feds?
Plus the Dems controlling the major media outlets want to replace Biden before the election. Not sure if Reason is part of the cabal, or just taking their cues from those who are.
I mean it's nice for Reason to actually focus on how terrible just every single mainstream Democrat idea is. Literally not one thing they want to do is helpful or desirable.
Right, but we're over halfway through his presidency. So I assume this stream of articles is a response to the SOTU, which is 100% fair.
But, I mean, it's not like he's the governor of Florida.
These policies existed since 2020. Took them 2 years to notice and complain. Maybe reason editors are just really "special" writers?
Perhaps when the Reason writers get together, they charter a bus. Just like a school bus, but shorter.
It's post mid-terms and the DNC has now green lit Biden attacks. They tried to get him to peacefully bow out of 2024. But he wouldn't walk away, so now the attacks begin,
Idk. But at least a SOTU is the ideal opportunity for a real policy discussion about multiple issues by any party interested in such a thing. Hmm. Doesn’t look like the LP is interested in discussing policy alternatives to what Biden said. They must not be interested in competing in future elections
By raising the effective tax rate on capital gains, the proposal would reduce U.S. saving, discourage entrepreneurship, and decrease economic output.
"BWAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!"
Yup, those are all patriarchal white supremacy ideals, and do nothing to promote equity and justice.
An annual tax on paper gains would be conspicuously complex.
Think of the JOBS!!
Yeah, I'm going to have to expand my valuation group so that I can charge for the valuations and the advisory services to shift assets or sell and then buy the next day for more to minimize future gains.
And just wait until your assets are weighted more for tax purposes if they aren't up to the ESG standards....
Think of the money they could have taxed on companies like pets.com during the dot-com bubble. Oh what a laugh the IRS would have had watching all the investors lose their shirts after collecting the taxes on theoretical gains.
Wonder how much taxes Sam Bankman-Fried would have been on the hook for and how he would pay them now? Maybe he could claw back some from the Democrats he funded?
If I am taxed yearly for unrealized gains, the total tax paid over the years could be more than 100% of my actual gain.
ya I think I saw "feature, not bug" somewhere above
That's only if you actually run your business relatively well. Just stop trying, live off the teat like everyone else. It worked out great for Communist utopias like the USSR... wait...
In addition to everything else wrong with this dumb plan, apparently president potato brain doesn't know what a billionaire even is.
Well, it's 1 billion dimes I guess...
It's called "false advertising", or, colloquially, "fraud".
He’s just being honest about who will be taxed.
Oh who am I kidding, it will get watered down to include anyone making more than a few hundred k.
"Say what you will about the Biden administration's approach to tax-the-rich populism: It's creative."
LOL
Billionaires wanted Biden to win.
The silver spoon billionaire who funds this website has increased his net worth by about $12,000,000,000 since Biden took over.
Billionaires demand looser borders because they want cheap labor pouring across and, wouldn't ya know it, Biden has been unable or unwilling to secure the border.
#OBLsFirstLaw
FTFY.
Edit: Oh, and while I’m at it: fuck you, cut spending.
Last month i managed to pull my first five figure paycheck ever!!! I’ve been working for this company online for 2 years now and i never been happier.They are paying me $95/per hour and the best thing is cause i am not that tech-savy, they only asked for basic understanding of internet and basic typing skill.It’s been an amazing experience working with them and i wanted to share this with you, because they are looking for new people to join their team now and i highly recommend to everyone to apply…
Visit following page for more information……………>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
Biden's proposal would tax unrealized gains—the increase in an asset's value, even before it's sold.
Do you really need any more proof the man is an idiot?
I don't need proof that water is wet either.
To see how this plays out, look up California Proposition 13.
The unintentional consequence of Prop 13 was to concentrate all taxing power in the state legislature since it was the only taxing authority that did not require a 2/3 vote of the people to increase taxes. Localities were hamstrung and no longer could compete for taxes with the state.
As soon as the legislature had supermajorities of Democrats, the Republican party became superfluous. Washington and Oregon are going the same way. There will never be a non-Democrat statewide office holder on the West Coast ever again.
So what you’re saying is we have to nuke it, just to be sure.
Yeah, but you've got to nuke it from orbit.
Just get rid of the democrats. If elections and the courts are meaningless, then it’s the only way.
By raising the effective tax rate on capital gains, the proposal would reduce U.S. saving, discourage entrepreneurship, and decrease economic output.
Seriously, do you even Fairness and Equity?
I'll never have a "net worth" of anywhere near 100 million but I've had to submit documents documenting my net worth many times. It is total bullshit. Speculative at best and fraudulent at worst. You don't actually know what any of your shit is worth until you're bankrupt and forced to sell. A capital gain is a number on a balance sheet that will in all likelihood be a different number tomorrow. But the government wants to confiscate it on December 31? Or April 15? This is total horseshit.
And unrealized losses would offset and carryforward, right?
Right?
3,000 bucks per year carry forward, like it's been since 1988.
Taxin the chickens before they hatch.
Biden's proposal is so crazy it makes those looney back-benchers in both parties look sane.
I dunno. AOC and the squad will say that Biden's program isn't nearly enough.
Last month i managed to pull my first five figure paycheck ever!!! I’ve been working for this company online for 2 years now and i never been happier.They are paying me $95/per hour and the best thing is cause i am not that tech-savy, they only asked for basic understanding of internet and basic typing skill.It’s been an amazing experience working with them and i wanted to share this with you, because they are looking for new people to join their team now and i highly recommend to everyone to apply…
Visit following page for more information……………>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
This clusterfuck fraud of a tax is imo the wall st billionaires response to the proposed wealth tax. The wealth tax is actually a viable tax on an often "undertaxed via income tax". The best way to get rid of that is conflate it with something else and make sure that something else benefits you
Stop calling it a "billionaire tax" -- it kicks in at 100 million, and will likely go lower. Call it a "wealth confiscation tax", or "tax on unrealized gains" or, more to the point, a "money grab".
It’s unconstitutional to tax unrealized gains. Not that the law ever stops a democrat.
The Democrat’s taxing billionaires is a farce. The last time I checked 19 of the 20 richest billionaires were Democrats, Alice Walton the only Republican. Why do billionaires prefer Democrats? Because they tax billionaires less! Soros, Buffet, Bezo, Koch, Gates, Page, Bloomberg, Zuckerberg, Musk (though he talks of changing parties) are all Democrats for one reason, to avoid paying taxes while the working class gets taxed to death.
Not only do Democrats tax billionaires less, their government spending, fiscal, and monetary policies are a boon to billionaires while screwing the middle class.
To get the votes to enact such policies, they also throw bones and make empty promises to people who are dependent on government.
By raising the effective tax rate on capital gains, the proposal would reduce U.S. saving, discourage entrepreneurship, and decrease economic output.
Yes, that is the goal. The Democrats crave a generally poorer society as they think it is more equitable. Plus, they like seeing people having to look to them for favors vs making it on their own.
Making people dependent on government is the democrat way.
It's not going to happen: the Democrats are the party of billionaires.
This is a political red herring to energize the base and blame Republicans
If anything were to pass, it would be called "the billionaire taxation act" just like the "inflation reduction act", yet it would mostly affect middle class savings and retirement accounts while effectively exempting billionaires.
So, would there be a refund if the asset in question gets sold at a loss making the "realized" gains negative?
Nazi's (National Sozialists) conquered the USA and now it's a sinking ship just as all the others were. No new story to tell here; just a bunch of GD stupid voters electing treasonous criminals to commit there selfish armed-robbery for them.
conquer and consume.
conquer and consume.
conquer and consume.
I miss the days when Liberty and Justice meant something.
Socialists, sure. But there's not a lot of the National in these folks. Pretty much they HATE this country and are doing everything they can to destroy it.
Sadly, the biggest problem remains. Because the U.S. government is Monetarily Sovereign, it has no need for, nor use of, tax dollars. It creates all the dollars it needs simply by spending.
All tax dollars originate in the M2 money supply measure. When they reach the Treasury they cease to be part of any money supply measure. They effectively are destroyed.
The purpose of federal taxes is not to fund federal spending but rather control the economy. They tax what they want to discourage and they give tax breaks to the rich.
That's almost right, except you have the beneficiaries wrong. "The rich" pay almost all the income taxes in this country, so they aren't getting any "tax breaks".
What the US government actually does is debase our currency to give massive handouts to lower and middle class Americans. Wall St and a few other well-connected elites and select billionaires also get their cut.
The people who are screwed over by this scheme are mostly upper middle class retirees and professionals, who are then denounced as being "the rich" for their troubles.
The stupidity of the author & most of the posters is astounding. A 1% purchase & sales tax on the stock markets would generate over 450% more revenue that what we currently collect through the IRS.
This system would allow every American & small business owner who earns less than $400K/yr, (98.8% of the country) to be exempt from federal income tax filing.
This is enough money to pay for every social program society needs & then the rich/Corps would be responsible for paying the governmental operations & their world wide military protection.