Review: Even in Tolkien's Middle Earth, You Can't Escape Immigration Restrictions
Elves need not apply.

Amazon's The Rings of Power series is a fun fantasy show that offers an escape from most things about 21st-century America—except its regulatory burdens.
Set in J.R.R. Tolkien's Middle Earth, the show serves as a prequel to the events of The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. Its primary plot points lean heavily on the fantastical elements of Tolkien's universe. We see the creation of powerful magic rings and the origin stories of the heroes and villains who will pop up in the author's more famous works. Overall, it's a refreshing break from more dour and cynical prestige fantasy shows such as HBO's House of the Dragon.
Even this ancient action-adventure romp can't escape incorporating some modern political themes. In one early episode, we see the protagonist, elf warrior Galadriel, contend with the racist immigration restrictions of the island kingdom of Númenor (elves need not apply). Her fellow refugee Halbrand fares no better under the kingdom's strict occupational licensing rules, which exclude him from working as a blacksmith without the requisite guild membership. The show even has a lesson about the perils of military adventurism: Númenor's attempted liberation of the Southlands from orc domination ends in a disaster that counterproductively spreads evil on the continent.
Absent from Rings of Power are Tolkien's deeper warnings about the destructive lust for power that lurks within every human heart. It's not that serious of a show. But its occasional libertarian themes give pleasing extra depth to the conflicts between orcs and elves.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Rings of Power is not set in Tolkien's Middle Earth. It is instead in a pale imitation of it where plot, character, narrative take second fiddle to diversity, equity, grrl-power.
Also ham-handed parodies of non-far-left policies. Sauron was painted with more nuance than the Numenoreans, probably because Disney's woke showrunners feel kinship with him.
The Elves of Eregion are apparently deceived by Sauron because Galadriel is covering her Noldorin arse by not telling Celebrimbor and Elrond who was giving them advice on making the Three Rings. Which is an interesting take on your strong female protagonist.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,600 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,600 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link——————————->>> http://Www.SmartJob1.Com
Which is a complete violation of canon as Sauron had no direct hand in the creation of the Three Rings (he did help with the Seven and the Nine). Nor was Galadriel even in Eregion at the time. She took one look at Annatar (Sauron in disguise) and when Celebrimbor wouldn't listen, got the hell out of dodge with her husband and daughter.
Amazon’s Rings of Power has been panned by Tolkien scholars, devotees and fans for being a shallow, woke “in name only” forgery that attempts to push current progressive groupthink agendas instead of sticking to the themes and richness developed by the original author. LGBTQ spray painted over the Mona Lisa would destroy that painting as it has done to Middle Earth.
This sums it up. It was a modern woke version of middle earth.
Which is funny, because they have to somehow progress forward in time to where most civilizations become more homogenous over time (I guess 'mixed' relationships get banned after rings of power?) to end up where they are actually there intended demo (ie, elves being tall, thin, very fair skinned creatures).
They basically wokified everything, and made Galadriel an extremely unlikable Mary-Sue (and a warrior, better than all the bestest warriors...which she wasnt) with fight scenes that required much more work from the other actors who had to flail around and do backflips to make it seem like this tiny girl could actually fight.
LOTR got the modern star wars / modern marvel treatment here. Promote female all powerful Mary Sue characters and modern woke messaging above all else, and watch as the story collapses under the weight of that trash.
LGBTQ spray painted over the Mona Lisa would destroy that painting as it has done to Middle Earth.
Pretty good soup-to-nuts summary.
What is libertarian about the inability to control one’s property against invasion by unwanted trespassers? (Illegal immigrants)
Reason doesn’t even pretend to be libertarian anymore.
Imagine them taking the same approach to one’s money:
“Taxation is the public’s right” would be their motto.
Or to one’s body:
“Bring back the draft! Conscription is great!”
Immigration is not the "libertarian" issue you seem to think it is. The short version is that the country is not your property to control. You have a property interest in the land that you actually own. You can keep unwanted people off that land as much as you like but you have no inherent right to keep me from inviting them onto my land when and as I like.
Nor, to the extent that "libertarians" agree to the concept of public property, do you have an inherent right to keep them off that property either.
The fact that you can find 100 like-minded people to vote with you to overrule my desire to allow visitors onto my property is majoritarian - a valid philosophy of government but very much not libertarian.
Thank you for waking up earlier than me to say this. I am really tired of people happy to give government control over all property on my behalf.
How about you define "nation" for us?
How about you then admitting that your "nation" controls all property within it, including everything which happens on that property, including speech, thoughts, and actions?
Where do you draw the line?
What actual speech, thoughts, and actions are you willing to grudgingly admit that I might do without asking your permission first?
Fuck off, slaver. Learn something about liberty before you start stomping all over it.
Nice dodge.
Either you believe in the concept of a nation, including borders and who gets to enter under what conditions, or you don't.
That has nothing to do with the definitions of liberties and restrictions on government for citizens and visitors.
You fuck off.
Either you believe in liberty and private property, or you believe in slavery. Your choice to believe in slavery does not require me to acquiesce.
Your choice to believe in slavery does not require me to acquiesce.
A lot like mine or anyone else's choice to believe in preemptive aggression. We can share a conception of liberty, private property, and preemptive violence but, unless you contort one of those or all three out of all proportion, we're going to have to come up with a way to distinguish those who share the conception, and the property owned by and liberties owed to them/us, and those who do not.
Otherwise, 'arbeit macht frei' and you should thank anyone giving you a job to do, including sitting your ass down and shutting up, even if they do it at the point of a gun.
Still not going to define your idea of a nation? But nice delusional false dichotomy.
I earned $50000 last month by the use of operating on-line most effective for five to eight hours on my pc and this was so that i in my opinion could not accept as authentic with earlier than running in this website. if you too want toclean earn this type of huge coins then come and be a part of us. do this internet-website on line .
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
"Nation" has nothing (necessarily) to do with "libertarian". I'd be happy to define "nation" for you but there are books written on the topic. It would help a lot if you'd first explain why you think that's relevant to either BigT's comment or my reply.
That said, I will address you're comment to ABC... that a nation includ[es] borders and who gets to enter under what conditions. You are correct that the concept of nation generally includes physical borders (though there are some counter-examples in history). You are incorrect in your assumption that all nations controlled who get to enter. Even the US had a period of many years where there were no such controls.
You appear to be conflating the issue of citizenship (which nations have always controlled) with immigration (which they often have not). While somewhat related, they are different concepts.
Even the US had a period of many years where there were no such controls.
And it had no income tax or welfare system either.
True - and very relevant to the problem of immigration. But not at all relevant to the definition of "nation".
By the way, the "libertarian" solution to both income tax and welfare is 'just stop'. So also not relevant to BigT's original comment.
What is libertarian about asserting the government owns all the property?
Now if you want to argue for private property owners buying border property and keeping out trespassers, I'm all in. But if you think the government gets to decide what happens to trespassers on land it doesn't own, then you have also given government permission to ban alcohol, drugs, tobacco, and whatever other contraband the government doesn't like; permission to control speech, thoughts, and other activity it doesn't like; and basically turned government into an absolute tyrant with power over everything on all the land, because government owns all the land.
No thanks!
I guess unlike the real Earth, Middle Earth doesn't have silver spoon billionaires who devote part of their inherited fortune to funding open borders advocacy. 🙁
The Numenoreans are worried about competing with Elves for jobs, yet they have not had an Elf in their lands for years if not decades. The writers do not understand how such things happen.
Middle Earth’s wealthy dwarf in comparison to real life though they had less environmental disasters such as global warming and air pollution in the form of smaug.
One monocle to rule them all.
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.workstar24.com
Sauron slaved away in a volcano in order to give all the races of Middle Earth gold rings and unite them. The Lord of Gifts even brought jobs to the Elven smiths of Eregion. What more could you ask of such a noble demigod?
And he opened the borders.
Didn't read enough of the sequels and/or Chris's work to be clear as to whether he actually opened the borders or just tried and was defeated by a bunch of bigotted trolls and backwards, uncultured idiots like Tom Bombadil.
If Sauron had held cocktail parties, Reason - Middle Earth would have written boaf sidez articles about Grey Man Bad.
Numenor's intervention in the Southlands did not cause the creation of Mordor. That would have happened if the Numenoreans did nothing.
If you want an anti-immigration policy in actual Tolkien, see the Silmarilion or The Children of Hurin and the Elvish Kingdom of Gondolin and what led to its Fall.
Rings of Power a Tolkien effort.
dwarfed in comparison.
Rings of Power was terrible, and your take is also terrible
Look kids! The hobbits live a happy life frolicking in the woods, all dirty with twigs in their hair. They own nothing (and probably eat bugs off camera).
Who is this lesson for?
How do you say, "I have no fucking cue who Tolkien is or what the fuck a middle-earth is." without saying "I have no fucking cue who Tolkien is or what the fuck a middle-earth is.".
This.
This incredibly moronic article.
Uh-oh, Chumbly missed his clue .....
How can they screw up a Tolkien story which mixes the Old Testament with Atlantis? Such a theme should have “awesome” painted all over it. Yet this show doesn’t sound that awesome – I haven’t heard any serious Tolkien fan praise it. No way I’ll waste time on this unless I’m bribed to do it.
I finished it yesterday and only started it because I ran out of Prime shows. It was entertaining enough provided you're not looking for "straight out the fucking books" but yes everything everyone said above rings true lol
It's on the lower-end of the Meh Scale.
But I have vowed that if the Stranger turns out to be Gandalf I'm going to cancel my Amazon Subscription.
Amazon’s The Rings of Power series is a fun fantasy show that offers an escape from most things about 21st-century America—except its regulatory burdens.
I’ve seen the trailers and heard the reviews. It doesn’t look anything like what you describe.
Even this ancient action-adventure romp can't escape incorporating some modern political themes. In one early episode, we see the protagonist, elf warrior Galadriel, contend with the racist immigration restrictions of the island kingdom of Númenor (elves need not apply).
Yes, because the show is written by zoomer activists who are “updating it for modern audiences”.
And Jesus H Christ, without discussing it explicitly, Tolkien’s Middle Earth (not Bezos’s) was an almost wholly segregated realm. The Humans had Humanland, the Elves had Elf Land, the Hobbits had Hobbit Land etc. It was Mordor and Sauron that wanted the borders opened and to destroy those nation-states by installing an EU-style bureaucratic regime over a group of nations which while mostly segregated by race, coexisted somewhat peacefully.
I mean, for chrissakes, the Elves DEFINITELY didn’t like interlopers into their territory, and if you got caught, the consequences could be dire.
So, elves are just like modern elites in exclusive neighborhoods?
Valinor is kind of the Martha's Vineyard of Middle Earth.
In fact, that's how pretty much all humans have lived throughout history: Native Americans, Muslims, Europeans, etc. all consisted of small, distinct cultures and societies.
People choose to live together with people who share their views, their religion, their lifestyle, and their appearance. Libertarianism not just tolerates this, it celebrates it.
Only Marxists and progressives oppose this.
I look forward to watching morality plays about the goodness of paying taxes and voting in upcoming fantasy shows.
Because we all know the real problem with the world is that everyone isn't up into everyone else's business enough.
No, this was not Tolkien's Middle Earth. It was Amazon's Rings of Power, which only had some of the names of people and places in common with anything Tolkien wrote. Almost nothing else.
Gosh, why might humans and a monarchy be concerned about immigration by nearly immortal, powerful magicians?
Guilds are collective bargaining for independent contractors and one of the few ways in which professionals could actually stand up to an all-powerful state. You are aware that Numenor is a monarchy, not a libertarian-style democracy, right?
So we should not try to liberate people from evil because we might lose?
Well, that's OK: Reason isn't that serious of a magazine. Unfortunately, Reason mostly lacks libertarian thought.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.APPRICHS.com
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM