She Lost Her Job For Showing a Painting of Muhammad in Class. Now, She's Suing.
"Hamline subjected López Prater to the foregoing adverse actions because . . . she did not conform her conduct to the specific beliefs of a Muslim sect," the lawsuit states.

Hamline University, a liberal arts college in Saint Paul, Minnesota, has come under fire in recent weeks after it refused to renew the contract of an adjunct professor who had shown images of the Prophet Muhammad in an art history class. Now the professor at the center of the controversy is suing, alleging religious discrimination and defamation.
In October, Erika López Prater, an adjunct professor at Hamline, showed students in an art history class two images of Muhammad. Both images were created by Muslim artists in the 14th and 16th centuries and were intended to show devotion and reverence to the prophet.
According to the lawsuit, López Prater was aware that some observant Muslim students would not wish to view the images and made considerable efforts to accommodate them. López Prater wrote in the course syllabus that the class would include "showing and discussing both representational and non-representational depictions of holy figures (for example, the Prophet Muhammad, Jesus Christ, and the Buddha)," adding, "if you have any questions or concerns about either missing class for a religious observance or the visual content that will be presented, please do not hesitate to contact me."
No students expressed concerns to López Prater, according to the lawsuit. López Prater also warned students multiple times during the class itself, giving them ample opportunity to leave class or look away.
That wasn't enough for Aram Wedatalla, the president of Hamline's Muslim Student Association. Wedatalla complained first to López Prater and then to the school's administration. Within weeks, López Prater had been formally denounced by the administration, which described her actions as "Islamophobic" and insisted that "respect for the observant Muslim students in that classroom should have superseded academic freedom."
The lawsuit alleges that López Prater was informed that, contrary to a previous assurance, she would not be welcome back to teach the following semester. As one administrator told Hamline's student newspaper, "it was decided it was best that this faculty member was no longer part of the Hamline community."
The school faced widespread condemnation for its actions, with the Council on American-Islamic Relations even releasing a statement defending López Prater. "Although we strongly discourage showing visual depictions of the Prophet," the statement reads, "professors who analyze ancient paintings for an academic purpose are not the same as Islamophobes who show such images to cause offense."
On Tuesday, López Prater filed a lawsuit against the school, alleging that the school engaged in religious discrimination and defamation against her, as well as violating its contractual guarantee of academic freedom.
"Instead of recognizing that López Prater had displayed the images of the Prophet Muhammad for a proper academic purpose, Hamline decided to impose Wedatalla's interpretation of Islam on all Hamline employees and students," the suit reads. "Hamline subjected López Prater to the foregoing adverse actions because she is not Muslim, because she did not conform her conduct to the specific beliefs of a Muslim sect, and because she did not conform her conduct to the religion-based preferences of Hamline that images of Muhammad not be shown to any Hamline student."
In the wake of López Prater's lawsuit, Hamline has walked back its most inflammatory claims against her, writing in a statement that "based on all that we have learned, we have determined that our usage of the term 'Islamophobic' was therefore flawed … It was never our intent to suggest that academic freedom is of lower concern or value than our students—care does not 'supersede' academic freedom, the two coexist."
Defamation is very difficult to prove, and it remains to be seen whether López Prater's lawsuit will be successful.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hamline decided to impose Wedatalla’s interpretation of Islam on all Hamline employees and students
So they banned all depictions of Muhammed by all faculty and students in accordance with Wedatalla’s wishes/interpretation?
Just to be clear, what’s the difference between declaring a professor unable to be fired for complaints and/or contractual obligations and granting them tenure? I don’t agree that the University should’ve fired the Prof., but this seems like a no-win (free association vs. free speech) situation from a liberty/libertarian perspective.
Hamlin claims to guarantee academic freedom. Libertarians recognize promises and contracts.
There is nothing complicated about this.
Libertarians recognize promises and contracts.
Completely unrealistic promises of equity and social contracts even!
You say 'libertarians recognize' like for the last 60+ yrs., we haven't watched liberal arts education devolve into a tenured right to compulsory Marxist indoctrination in the name of free speech.
Your contract expired, Hamline didn't renew. Sorry, better luck next time. End of story. Otherwise, Muslim Ideology > Marxist Ideology or Marxist Ideology > Muslim Ideology, your choice.
I’ve made $19490 just within thirty days by simply working part-time on home computer. As I lost my last position, I was very upset but thankfully I have started this online assignment & in this way I am capable to get thousand USD easily from home. Each individual can certainly avail this easy work & may earn extra money on-line by exploring this website……. http://Www.Smartcash1.com
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.SmartJob1.Com
I agree w/ you on the 'contract not renewed' argument, but it appears that the sole reason for not renewing her contract was a violation of freedom of expression. The school can do as it pleases, but it appears that she was quite conscientious -overly sensitive even, in her ample prior notifications re the imagery. Taken in conjunction w/ 'Hamline students and student organizations are free to examine and discuss all questions of interest to them and to express opinions publicly and privately,' the school is seriously out of line. Yes, the policy does not include staff & faculty, but would need to extend to classroom discussions.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
You have to completely ignore your own joke to not understand. The question is really how much did they need to inform (school and prof), whether the complainer acted appropriately and whether acted proportionately.
The prof had warnings on the syllabus and prior to viewing so they're reasonably good.
The student ignored those warnings then made the complaint, so they're out of bounds and the only question is how malicious were they.
The school decided to use an arbitrary metric in this case so they're out of bounds unless they've scrubbed depictions of Mohammed from all classes and libraries.
It's not that they cannot be fired for complaints but the firing needs to be proportionate and for justifications not directly tied to the academic subject.
The student ignored those warnings then made the complaint, so they’re out of bounds and the only question is how malicious were they.
So students... customers... aren't allowed to complain? Sounds like a free speech issue to me.
It’s not that they cannot be fired for complaints but the firing needs to be proportionate and for justifications not directly tied to the academic subject.
They weren't fired. Their contract wasn't renewed. Don't like it? Negotiate a better contract. That's how this Libertarian thing works.
As I indicated subsequently, this isn't a straight up free speech issue, it's free speech vs. free association. A victory for the Prof. means students can't complain even when the curriculum is oppressively slanted (You don't get to decide what 'oppressively slanted' means, no complaints!) Not the Libertarian win anybody is looking for.
Stupid games, stupid prizes and everybody is assholes.
mad.casual says things that are blasphemy per my religion, so I demand that mad.casual be fired. I'll threaten their employer with legal action until mad.casual is fired.
You happy with that freedom of speech?
but this professor wasn’t fired. Her contract wasn’t renewed. Those are two completely different things. If they did fire her before her contract was over, then she would have a case in my estimation.
This is what sucks about being an adjunct. This is also the kind of thing that “tenure” is supposed to protect people from (in an ideal world anyway. I recognize that the tenure system is completely and utterly fucked up and used largely in ways it wasn’t supposed to be).
Inalienable rights are those that can’t be sold, given or taken away. Each person always carries them everywhere they go.
Do you value the constitution or not?
No legal contract can remove any inalienable right from anyone.
From a “libertarian” perspective? Lmao tenure isn’t inconsistent with liberty unless you’re a right wing noose needing lunatic.
Sounds like the courts will need to mullah this over.
I wonder if the walk-back by the administration will pull the rug out from under both the whining Muslim and the college's legal defense.
Allah let you know later.
End this mosquerade.
What do you call a small mosque?
A mosquito!
That art teacher is drawing conclusions about this.
It doesn’t paint a pretty picture.
We should canvas the area for others with a similar opinion. We may need to properly frame the narrative.
Sounds sketchy.
Chalk it up to public opinion.
This islam.
Hamline is not halal or it would be named Lambline.
Showing a muslim prophet at HAMline U? That's just bad taste.
Speaking of bad taste ...
I've always said I was a man of great taste. I never specified good or bad.
The TIME magazine Man of the Year loophole!
As Time's 2006 Man of the Year, I resent any suggestion it is anything but an honor.
The showing of the picture was listed in the syllabus. I am sure the president of Hamline's Muslim Student Association just happened to take that class and was ambushed by this outrageous offense.
I've read several articles about this incident, and none of them mention whether he actually WAS a student enrolled in that particular class.
Good on her for pushing back.
Great article, Mike. I have pushed back 19,324 times since first being pushed.
Why is a school enforcing religious doctrine? Because it helps them attack their enemies, conservatives.
Compare this to Piss-Christ. They delight in attacking Christianity - although they would never criticize black churches or attendees. But they encourage Muslims expecting sharia enforcement because they know the conflict will predominantly be between Muslims and conservatives. They expect left wingers to be smart enough to keep out of the way and let this happen.
Well, to be fair, the last time someone was beheaded for mocking Christianity was a long time ago. Last time I recall a teacher getting in trouble for showing a picture of Muhammad, his head was chopped off by a cleaver in the streets of France and that was in 2020.
Fun fact: Back in the 90s when the book Satanic Verses came out, and also the same time Last Temptation of Christ was in the theaters (with the book making a come back), I was working in a bookstore. An independent bookstore that carried both book when most bookchains made the decision not too.
Upshot: There remains a fatwah on my head, endorseed by "Peace Train" Cat Stevens, for selling Rushdie's work. Not me personally, by name, but to any who sold the book. And Cat Stevens (local Peace Train activist) said it was good that we were under a death threat.
Upshot: We got a boycott of The Last Temptation of Christ.
Boycott or murder? Boycott or murder? How to choose. Sorry, but the Christians are far more peaceful than the Muslims, not two ways about it.
p.s. Okay, not all Muslims. My neighbor at the time was Muslim and she bought a copy of Rushdie (a Muslim) from me. The problem is not Islam, the problem is that branch of Islam promoted by the government of Saudi Arabia and exported around the world. Why they are our ally in the region is baffling to me. But we came to their aid and toppled the secular government in Iraq which was wholly uninvolved with 9/11. Politics and religion, let's keep them separate, okay?
You know, just asking out of curiosity — is there any kind of reward for offing you? You know, just asking.
"Ooh!-Ahh!-Eee!-Ahh!-Ooh!-Ahh!"
Is that the sound of torturing dissenters in the song by The Artist Formerly Known As Cat? 😉
Boycott or murder? Boycott or murder? How to choose. Sorry, but the Christians are far more peaceful than the Muslims, not two ways about it.
They both believe in absurdities. The atrocities that follow can happen anytime from either one. As Bastiat observed, plunder of Life, Liberty, and Property only stop when plunder is made too painful to practice, something a Secular Constitution and law does...if we can keep it.
The problem is not Islam, the problem is that branch of Islam promoted by the government of Saudi Arabia and exported around the world. Why they are our ally in the region is baffling to me.
Ackshuyally, that is where Islam began, where the the most Holy Cities Mecca and Medina are located. No Saudi Peninsula, no Islam.
But yes, your assessment is right. The Saudis are not our friends.
Also it was Shia Islamic Iran's Ayatollah that declared the fatwa against Rushdie.
And those are the two main factions of Islam, with Wahabbi, Salafi, and Sufi as smaller factions, but they are no better on dissent.
Basically, for the worldview of Islam to coexist Western Libertarian values, it's going to need a nut-cutting change or it needs to die. It is already slowly dying with new converts slowly backing away when they see the grim passages of Al-Qu'ran.. It also is dying as lifelong Muslims are exposed to opposing viewpoints via the Internet. Your neighbor appears to be a good example of the latter.
I'm still pining for Paramount's Mecca and Medina, Six Flags Over Tehran, and EPCOT Jerusalem. Oh! Happy Day when then open! 🙂
The Last Temptation was written by a devout convert to catholicism. It was not in any way blasphemous, and anyway, the catholics were the ones doing the burning back in the day.
There's no grand conspiracy.
Look, it's like rock-paper-scissors.
Black beats white. Trans beast cis. Gay beats straight. Woman beats man. Muslim beats Christian. Student beats professor. Poor beats rich. Liberal beats conservative.
Arguments and actions don't matter. What matters are the characteristics of the people involved.
There’s no grand conspiracy.
What's the difference between political activism and a conspiracy?
It's bizarre sarc characterizes something that absolutely happened as a "conspiracy" only to then assert it didn't happen as if his characterization controls reality. When people set policy to adhere to their political desires does it cease to exist when sarc calls it a conspiracy?
Where do these fools come from?
Sarc thinks you're a conspirac theorist of you were against covid lockdowns, Twitter censorship, trump russia... even though you were right.
Is it a conspiracy to claim Title IX was corrupted into our current campus sex police and kangaroo courts? Or was it the result of a calculated campaign of activism?
Similarly the left's promotion of Islam, trans hysteria, reparations support, and race preferences are not some naturally evolved topics of discussion. They are the result of specifically coordinated political and media campaigns by political activists working through our institutions and bureaucracies. Calling them a conspiracy is either hopelessly naive or an effort to pretend these movements don't exist and shouldn't be opposed even though we see the results and the activists are lauded for their efforts.
He doesn't understand how anything works. He acts like these circumstances miraculously fell out of the sky as if he was born yesterday.
"If free speech means anything it means my right to say what you don't want to hear." - George Orwell
There's no right to not be offended.
Most colleges & universities prefer a different Orwell quote:
“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
If you’re one of the special animals, you can offend the other animals as much as you like. Heck, you can even beat them up!
But if you’re a non-special animal, and you offend, ever so slightly, one of the special animals — watch out!
When trigger warnings are good enough. For the left the trigger warnings were just the camel's nose into the tent, the goal is full control of speech on campus and off.
Yep. Giving a trigger warning is a confession to hate speech.
The left lmao holy shit who runs this site?
The good news out of this is the almost near universal WTF from everyone except the extremist community in Minnesota.
Even the national CAIR is pulling back from the decision.
Proggies are either pulling back, or studiously ignoring the issue. You only hear about it from libertarian outlets like Reason, and maybe from conservative outlets if the topic of the day isn't immigration.
did anyone ask Ilhan Omar what she thinks?
They did, they haven't gotten an answer yet.
Who cares?
kinda the point, dude.
she thinks
Assumes a fact not in evidence.
I showed a Mohammed picture in class
The dean, threw me out on my ass.
I filed a lawsuit, gonna make a quick buck.
Everybody's so sensitive, they can get fucked
Life's been good to me so far...
Don't know why Joe Walsh popped into my head when i read that headline.
A female art teacher…broad strokes. Don’t brush that pun aside.
That the picture looks great from far away but, up close, is a complete mess was the impression I got. To understand why the school or the Professor is trying to cut off their ear to spite their face, follow the Monet.
imagine if she showed L'Origine du monde
We do this Dali.
Only if the monet is good.
I have to Gogh, I have a case of Degas.
When I did my prep for a colonoscopy, I had to Gogh and Gauguin. 😉
I wonder if the offended student has a student loan. Interest is also sacrilege to faithful Muslims.
Muslims have approved work-arounds for making paying interest not paying interest.
Maybe they pay with gold dinars.
That wasn't enough for Aram Wedatalla, the president of Hamline's Muslim Student Association. Wedatalla complained first to López Prater and then to the school's administration. Within weeks, López Prater had been formally denounced by the administration, which described her actions as "Islamophobic" and insisted that "respect for the observant Muslim students in that classroom should have superseded academic freedom."
Sounds like Wedatalla has a bright future in Silicon Valley, working in the Trust and Safety industry.
My guess is they know they can't win a lawsuit, but they will play this out in the court of public opinion until Hamline settles just to make it go away.
That's about the only way adjunct faculty can make good money.
I think she may have a contracts case, though. Most academic contracts emphasize the instructor has the right to freedom of speech and academic freedom, although they may contain restrictions. I doubt if any of those restrictions contain a snowflake clause, however.
They'll probably say that they get to call anyone an "Islamophobe" because it's all a matter of opinion and ther term can be applied to anyone you don't like. It's not as if it's a defamatory term with a definable meaning which can be proven or disproven.
If it gets that far, I hope that defense doesn't work, but you never know.
"That wasn't enough for Aram Wedatalla, the president of Hamline's Muslim Student Association. Wedatalla complained first to López Prater and then to the school's administration."
Wedatalla seems to be in the wrong country, and has shown great disrespect for our laws. Perhaps a beheading in in order, to encourage the others (to leave).
Was Prater confused about "Liberal" arts in the 21st century?
Had the teacher required students to paint a gay wedding, this would have been interesting.
Any gofundme page for Ms. Prater?
Just another blessing from Commie-Education.
And then you wonder why Christians are getting obnoxious again - they want the same power to veto anything they don't like that Muslims have.
I am a Hamline alumnus. Unfortunately, this kerfuffle broke the week Hamline began its pledge drive. I told Hamline by e-mail that I wouldn't give them a red cent unless they rehired the art teacher. I wonder how many other alumni did the same thing. I also wonder if someone or something put the Muslim students up to this.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
People lobbying for their agendas are expected to cancel anyone they can to further them or someone else will be appointed to..
By letting them do it we give them absolute power and we in turn have witch hunts, book burning and persecution for simply sharing information.
It’s a dangerous bigoted new world.
Good for her. Sue that woke landfill until the pillars tremble.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM