Biden's Newest Student Loan Proposal Would Allow Some Borrowers To Pay Back Only a Fraction of What They Owe
New changes to income-driven repayment plans announced Tuesday would essentially turn student loans into government grants.

Seemingly undeterred by the multiple recent defeats of his student loan forgiveness plan in federal courts, President Joe Biden has unveiled another program designed to lower the burden of student loan costs—this time, attempting to turn federal student loans into glorified grants, a shift that is likely to result in a further acceleration of ever-increasing college costs.
In August, Biden announced a sweeping loan forgiveness proposal which, in addition to promising to forgive thousands of dollars in loans for over 20 million eligible Americans, also contained a provision noting an intent to expand currently existing student loan forgiveness programs. One such program up for reform was "income-driven repayment" (IDR), a group of five plans that allowed participants to have their monthly payments topped at a set percentage of their "discretionary income"—adjusted gross income left over after subtracting a set percent of the federal poverty threshold. Under Biden's plan, the program would be changed to radically reduce the amount borrowers enrolled in IDR plans pay back.
On Tuesday, the Biden administration announced a full-fledged transformation of the IDR. The proposed 179-page regulation expands upon the planned changes to the IDR originally announced in August. Under the new program, which is set to be called REPAYE, the previous five IDR plans would be consolidated into one streamlined program.
Under REPAYE plans, borrowers would have their loans forgiven after just 10 years of payments—in comparison to the 20-year requirement for most current IDR plans. REPAYE would also halve the percentage of discretionary income forfeited toward student loan payments in comparison to most IDR plans—reducing the amount owed to only 5 percent for undergraduate loans. Further, the new program would expand the amount of income considered non-discretionary, rising to 225 percent of the federal poverty level—around $30,000—from 100 percent to 150 percent currently, depending on the specific plan used. The new program would also prevent borrowers' balances from growing as long as they make regular payments—even if those payments are too low to cover interest. However, the policy is not yet set in stone; the proposal is subject to a 30-day public comment period, after which the official regulation will be announced.
If successfully implemented, the new REPAYE program will practically turn federal student loans into grants, allowing students to borrow large amounts for college tuition and only pay a fraction of the amount owed before forgiveness. For example, under the new plan, a single borrower making $60,000 annually would be expected to pay a meager $1,475 a year in student loan bills—just $123 a month. Assuming the borrower's wage and marital status stayed the same for 10 years, this borrower would pay back only $14,750 of their undergraduate student loans—no matter how much they spent to attend college. As the Education Department wrote in a Tuesday press release, "Future cohorts of borrowers would see their total payments per dollar borrowed decrease by 40%. Borrowers with the lowest projected lifetime earnings would see payments that are 83% less."
Such a policy would incentivize destructive behavior from borrowers and colleges alike. Students—unlikely to ever face full repayment of a hefty student loan bill—would be unconcerned by the prospect of taking on large student loan balances, while colleges would continue to hike prices for students more than happy to pay with government money.
"Compared to other federal spending programs intended to reduce poverty or benefit children, broad debt relief programs are more costly and benefit more advantaged Americans," Adam Looney of the Brookings Institution wrote in September. "The amounts borrowers save (and eventually have forgiven) are based largely on the amounts students borrow, which means the benefits are uncapped and disproportionately flow to borrowers with the largest loans, who are more likely to be graduate students and students who attended more expensive programs."
While it is unclear whether this latest proposal will face legal pushback, the Biden administration's planned changes to IDR plans would radically change how college is paid for—turning student loans into essentially government grants. However, like the rest of Biden's student loan proposals, the main result would be more incentive for colleges to keep raising their prices—and for taxpayers to keep footing the bill.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A nation doesn’t get $32,000,000,000,000 in debt serendipitously, it requires a lot of effort by folks like Biden.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.APPRICHS.com
Nice end run, but still unconstitutional.
If the current IDR plans are constitutional I don't see why these changes wouldn't be.
Under REPAYE plans, borrowers would have their loans forgiven after just 10 years of payments—in comparison to the 20-year requirement for most current IDR plans.
If you can't pay your loans off in 10 years (let alone 20), you have seriously fucked up.
If you can’t pay your loans off in 10 years (let alone 20), you have seriously fucked up.
Why would I pay them off in 10 years if Uncle Sam will do it for me?
You didn't fuck up, the lender did
Loans should only be given to people who have a reliable plan to pay it back.
●US Dollar Rain Earns upto $550 to $750 per day by google fantastic job oppertunity provide for our community pepoles who,s already using facebook to earn money 85000$ every month and more through facebook and google new project to create money at home withen few hours.Everybody can get this job now and start earning online by just open this link and then go through instructions to get started.......
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
Yeah, but banks already do that. It's how they make money. The government has to make these loans to people who obviously won't pay them back because no private party will. It's not like it's Uncle Sam's money to lose anyway, and even if it was, they can just print more.
Help me game this out.
If I take out a $500k loan, and then spend 10 years in med school and fellowship, I can be a rich doctor who never paid for undergrad?
Or if I go to Baylor at $60k/year for an MRS degree, I never have to pay it back? Do I have to live in sin for 10 years to make this work?
Assuming you go straight from undergrad to med school to residency, you would still have to pay your undergrad loans, because once you complete residency you'd probably be making too much money to qualify for an IDR plan.
With your MRS you may not have to live in sin, but you can't combine finances or joint file federal income taxes.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,800 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,800 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link------------------------------->>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
It doesn't matter. It's not about Student Loans. It's about helping higher education grease their pockets, since most are democratic supporters.
You don't hear any arguments about lowering tuition or making them using their money. Maybe the schools themselves should be in the loan business. I bet they would sing a different tune.
Too many administers, too many bad degrees, too many not going to a 2 year college first.
Too many jobs require what is essentially a 4 year liberal arts degree to do highly skilled but specialized work. This is one thing the Europeans do better, bifurcating between academics and advanced technical skills earlier in education. Even college-prep high school is wasted on about 2/3 of the population. They are not interested, they don't get it, and apparently don't seem to need it and certainly don't retain it.
Even worse, those kids in College Prep classes, that aren't destined for college degrees, actually take away from the kids who are.
You're pretty much never more peer-oriented than when you're a teen. If the people around you are all heavily invested in good academic performance, it's way easier, as a teen, to study hard and perform well. Getting kids who don't care, and who don't really want to be there, into more appropriate classes also removes that disruptive influence from the kids who remain.
This is true. While I was in school I had a job interview that demanded a bachelors for what amounted to an office job. It didn't matter that what I was going to school for had nothing to do with being a glorified secretary / accountant . They just used a 4 yr degree as a filter to not have to go through resumes by hand. It was stupid. This is the fault of job hiring managers, not students. There is no regulation for outlandish job hiring practices. As long as there are poor ppl, there will be ppl willing to jump through hoops for a job.
Not getting a college degree tells employers that you aren't capable or motivated enough to play The Game. When ability to play the game is a skill you care about in your employees, filtering out people without degrees is entirely rational.
They were using college as a filter, but not to avoid reading resumes. Since you can hire someone else to write your resume, it’s no proof of literacy, and neither is a high school diploma anymore. What employers would prefer to do is to administer a test for whatever level of literacy and math is required for the job, but the DOL has essentially banned such tests because people of a certain color frequently skipped class starting in grade school and do badly on tests.
RCI had an article about rebate checks from colleges, the amount given to students after tuition is paid. Colleges refused to respond how much these checks were in total. The checks can only be used for educational material like books. Interviews w students talk about them using it for cars and trips.
Hookers, alcohol and tobacco wouldn’t be any worse.
No mention of how fucked up things are when such a massive change is possible by executive order.
C'mon Reason, you've long ago lost your mojo.
Lovely.
Now, about my mortgage; is Biden going to magically make that go away too?
Looks as if Biteme seriously trying to out-do LBJ, BHO and FDR.
"would essentially turn student loans into government" ..... GRANTING THE use of Gov-Guns to commit !!!----Armed-Theft---!!! on those 'icky' citizens to fulfill one's own selfish/greedy ends/desires...
How the left compulsively subsidizes CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.
Kirkland has provided the Anime perspective once again.
Making money online is more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I received $18376 last month. It's an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office jobs and even a little child can do this and earn money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info on this page..... http://Www.workstar24.com
Sounds like these borrowers could be turned unto freeloaders at a level customarily reached mostly by churches, Republican backwaters, and the Trump Organization.
Nah. Most freeloaders are democrat trash. Like you.
So if churches are freeloaders because they are exempt from taxes, what does that make the equally tax-exempt schools?
What? is there another election coming up, or is this just early prep for 2024?
Same thing will happen as the recent electric vehicle credit.
Cost (tuition) will just go up proportionate to what was given. EV manufacturers instantly increased their prices about exactly as much as the tax credit.
If you dont tackle the very insanely out of control tuition situation, nothing will change. Other than govt spending going up more.
Lord help us once someone decides that food is getting too expensive.
So another federal program named the opposite of what it is.
Unconstitutional and will never become reality. Why are the democrats okay with blowing millions dollars on idiotic fantasy that has no chance?
For votes. "We tried to help you but those dastardly Republicans thwarted us again!"
And as an added "bonus": the more worthless and the more overpriced your degree is, the more the tax payers subsidize you!
I think it's a great idea: there is no quicker way to destroy higher education than this, and higher ed deserves to be destroyed.
The Democrats really want to keep the courts busy.
I guess having your vote bought just isn't as profitable as it used to be!
I earn $100 per hour while taking risks and travelling to remote parts of the world. I worked remotely last week while in Rome, Monte Carlo, and eventually Paris. I’m back in the USA this week. I only perform simple activities from this one excellent website.
view it, copy it here….>>>> http://Www.Smartcash1.com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.PAYNET2.COM
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM