Cameras Should Stay in Place After the House Picks a Speaker
C-SPAN has shown House proceedings since 1979 but only what the House chooses to let it show. That needs to change.

The U.S. House of Representatives has struggled all week to elect a new speaker. Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R–Calif.), the presumptive frontrunner, has so far lost over a dozen separate votes as he struggles to win over dissenters in his own party.
During what should otherwise be a completely routine and unexceptional parliamentary procedure, viewers are glued to C-SPAN, the nonprofit cable channel that has aired live, unedited footage from the House floor since 1979. The proceedings have even produced viral moments: Newly-elected congressman and serial fabulist George Santos (R–N.Y.) sitting alone in the House chamber. Children, tired and bored, waiting for their parents to finish.
In two other separate videos, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.) spoke privately with far-right Reps. Paul Gosar (R–Ariz.) and Matt Gaetz (R–Fla.), her presumptive ideological opposites. The video of Gaetz and Ocasio-Cortez prompted speculation as to what the two were discussing; when The Intercept's Ryan Grim asked her, Ocasio-Cortez said that the two were discussing a "side deal" that McCarthy allegedly tried to strike with some Democrats.
If this week feels unusually exciting for the typically staid C-SPAN, there's a reason for that. Ben O'Connell, C-SPAN's director of editorial operations, told VICE that private video cameras are usually not allowed in the U.S. House. The House Recording Studio, a government entity, controls all cameras in the chamber and allows C-SPAN and others to broadcast the footage it captures. Many times over four decades, C-SPAN asked for permission to add its own cameras to the chamber, and each time the House denied the request.
But C-SPAN is allowed to bring in its own cameras during certain high-profile events, like swearing-in ceremonies or the State of the Union. Since the House speaker vote is one of those events, and it has stretched on for several days, the cameras have been able to stay and capture candid moments between members that would otherwise not be seen by anybody not physically present.
In practice, there are strict rules on what the House's own cameras may cover, only showing the member speaking or a wide shot of the dais. In the past, any deviations from that format proved controversial: Then-Rep. Newt Gingrich (R–Ga.), who joined Congress the same year C-SPAN debuted, routinely gave speeches after House business had concluded, for the benefit of the viewing audience at home. In 1984, then-Speaker Thomas "Tip" O'Neill (D–Mass.) ordered the cameras to cut away and show that Gingrich was addressing an empty chamber. The incident later led to a contentious debate on the House floor.
In fact, government officials often resist openness: Even though C-SPAN started showing House proceedings in 1979, the Senate did not assent until 1986. The Supreme Court still does not allow video or even photographs of its oral arguments; it took the COVID-19 pandemic for the Court to finally offer livestreaming audio rather than simply transcripts and recordings after the fact.
The benefits of more openness are apparent this week in the House: Elected representatives earning a taxpayer-funded salary should be doing their business in as open a manner as possible. That not only includes their public speeches but what they do when they're not speaking into a microphone.
We only know about Gaetz and Ocasio-Cortez's private confab because it took place while C-SPAN was allowed in; that few seconds on air led to widespread speculation, which prompted journalists to look into it and learn more information about McCarthy's wheeling-and-dealing behind closed doors. Without the special permission granted for the event, the American public would not have known about any of it.
More openness in government is a good thing, even (and especially) when government officials resist it. After a new speaker is elected, he or she should allow the new cameras to stay.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.
This is where i started..............>>> http://Www.OnlineCareer1.com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.PAYNET2.COM
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.RICHAPP2.com
>>The video of Gaetz and Ocasio-Cortez prompted speculation as to what the two were discussing
whether or not she wanted to goto the mattress over the votes
There's one of those fake lip-reading videos going around of AOC and Gaetz discussing shrubs and rocks in a garden which does a remarkably good job of matching.
https://twitter.com/RitaPanahi/status/1610592176790200321
Yes! That's it. "Rocks are my friends", amazing, I don't know how they do such good work.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,300 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdzm8K1WQiA
I’d think a scissor fight between her and Boebert might be good for ratings.
Throw in a rock and some paper and they might agree.
Home earnings allow all people to paint on-line and acquire weekly bills to financial institutions. Earn over $500 each day and get payouts each week instantly to account for financial institutions. (bwj-03) My remaining month of earnings was $30,390 and all I do is paint for as much as four hours an afternoon on my computer. Easy paintings and constant earnings are exquisite with this job.
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
I’ve made $1250 so far this week working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’AM made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do, .for more information simply.
Open this link thank you……>>> http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
>>Newt Gingrich ... routinely gave speeches after House business had concluded, for the benefit of the viewing audience at home.
totally watched them. nerd.
During what should otherwise be a completely routine and unexceptional parliamentary procedure, viewers are glued to C-SPAN
I just wanna give you the working class, outside-the-beltway perspective on this here... no... no they're not.
To be fair, he said “viewers” are glued to C-SPAN. I believe it’s entirely possible he spoke to both of them and they confirmed they can’t take their eyes off it.
Google paying a splendid earnings from domestic 6850USD a week, this is awesome a 12 months beyond i was laid-off in a totally horrible financial system. “w many thank you google every day for blessing the ones guidelines and presently it’s miles my responsibility to pay and percentage it with all and sundry .
See this article for more information————————>>>GOOGLE WORK
Yes, sure, gossips like the shot of Gaetz and Ocasio-Cortez talking. What's the actual benefit to anyone?
Simply asserting that "More openness in government is a good thing" is not an argument in the absence of any listing whatsoever of benefits.
More testing will solve this problem. And blockchain. Blockchain will solve this and the grease trap problem for food carts.
Well, there might be some benefit if there was audio to go with it.
Is AOC doing OK in this pic? …Oh wait, her eyes always look like that, don’t they?
Can I ask what makes Gaetz "far right"? How does Reason even define this?
He voted against the $1.7 trillion spending bill and he opposes open borders. That makes him "far right" as far as Reason is concerned.
Need to keep the $$$ and cheap labor coming in for Reason's supporters.
C-SPAN, the nonprofit cable channel that has aired live, unedited footage from the House floor
The House Recording Studio, a government entity, controls all cameras in the chamber and allows C-SPAN and others to broadcast the footage it captures.
In practice, there are strict rules on what the House's own cameras may cover, only showing the member speaking or a wide shot of the dais.
hardly seems unedited. Every government employee and elected official should be required to wear bodycams. At least this way when they take a hammer to the evidence they will cave in someone's chest.
Why? I mean representatives are supposed to discuss thing among themselves and make deals, that's why we elected them.
Perhaps you'd be happier with direct democracy, where everything is voted on by everybody?
"I mean representatives are supposed to discuss thing among themselves and make deals, that’s why we elected them."
This is true, but how does that mean that "we the people" shouldn't know what deals they are making?
Yes, we elect them to discuss things and make deals. No, we do not elect them to do so in secret.
All votes and laws are public. Why does it matter to you how they got there?
They consider it vitally important to leave their routine violations of the quorum clause undocumented. You don't want some controversial bill passing on a voice vote, and then the peons noticing that there were only five people in the chamber when it passed "unanimously", or that a lot of the members were screaming "Nay" at the top of their lungs.
Yes, cameras should stay in place after the House picks a Speaker. This is because the Speaker of the House is a major role in the legislative process and the public should be able to watch the proceedings. Having cameras in the House allows for greater transparency and can help build trust in the government. Additionally, the cameras can be used to document any controversial decisions or discussions that take place during the Speakership.
Openness seems like a good thing and very American. In reality, studies have shown that the ability to have discussions behind closed doors leads to a more effective Congress. It means congressmen can discuss how strongly they really feel about a bill and what it would take to have them switch their votes. It allows them to discuss personal concerns and have their fellow lawmakers get to know them better. So privacy leads to more compromise, whereas openness leads to more bombastic, face-saving, hard-lining and a broken Congress. Even the presence of C-SPAN has been shown to have led to less compromise. One of the best discussions about the downsides of “openness” within the Congress is found in parts of “The Future of Freedom” by Fareed Zakaria. Read it and see if you agree.
To believe the premise that C-Span coverage makes for better government, you have to believe that the Congress is better at doing its job today than it was before 1979. I think it might cause better government if the House members were not aware of the cameras, but any benefit it might have had is outweighed by the fact that it is reality TV.
I am profiting (400$ to 500$/hr )online from my workstation. A month ago I GOT cheque of about 30k$, this online work is basic and direct, don’t need to go OFFICE, Its home online activity. By then this work opportunity is fbegin your work….★★
Copy Here→→→→→ http://Www.Smartcash1.com