For the First Time, Pennsylvania Might Have an Independent Speaker of the House
A declaration of independence capped a wild day in Pennsylvania's State House.

Believe it or not, the craziest political drama on Tuesday wasn't the historic and unpredictable scenes that played out in Congress—where, as of this writing, lawmakers have tried and failed five times to determine who will be the next speaker of the House of Representatives.
That's nothing compared to what happened about a hundred miles north of D.C. on Tuesday afternoon, where members of the Pennsylvania State House met in Harrisburg to hold their leadership vote.
As in Congress, Republicans came into the day with a slim majority in the Pennslyvania House. As in Congress, neither party could put forward a candidate for speaker who could win a majority of votes.
Then, things got wild: With the body deadlocked, lawmakers moved to adjourn the session. That vote also failed—meaning members could not even agree to go home. Since the alternative was being stuck together in what one statehouse reporter called "legislative purgatory," the lawmakers decided they might as well try to pick a speaker. A Democratic representative won that vote—with the support of more than a dozen Republicans—then immediately declared himself to be an independent (even as Democrats reportedly disputed the notion that he'd leave the party).
And, honestly, that's just the final act of what's been a completely bonkers two months in Pennsylvania politics.
Tuesday's chaos began on Election Day, when Democrats swung 12 state House seats. That seemed enough to give Democrats majority control of the chamber for the first time since 2010—a fitting end to what had been an especially disappointing election cycle for Republicans in Pennsylvania.
But the Democrats' 102–101 majority was always a mirage. Because one of their members was dead.
State Rep. Anthony DeLuca (D–Penn Hills) died in October, but that was after the deadline to replace a candidate on the ballot. In December, the Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, which serves a nonpartisan referee function similar, in some ways, to the role of the U.S. Senate's Parliamentarian, ruled that "an individual must at least be elected and living to qualify as a member of a legislative caucus." Therefore, Democrats did not have the majority.
Then they fell into the minority. Two Democratic state representatives had won other elections in November—Austin Davis is the lieutenant governor–elect, and Rep. Summer Lee (D–Penn.) is now a member of Congress—and as a result, both had to resign their posts in the Pennsylvania House.
So Republicans entered Tuesday's first day of the legislative session with a fraught 101–99 majority. When the dust cleared, however, it was Rep. Mark Rozzi (D– or maybe I–Reading) elected speaker of the Pennsylvania House.
"The commonwealth that is home to Independence Hall will now be home to this commonwealth's first independent speaker of the House," Rozzi said during a brief speech on the House floor Tuesday, according to Spotlight PA. "I pledge my allegiance and my loyalty to no interest in this building, to no interest in our politics. I pledge my loyalty to the people of the Commonwealth."
Later, he seemed to backtrack that declaration of independence, according to the Associated Press, telling reporters that he viewed the role of the speaker as a "nonpartisan officer of the House, entrusted with maintaining the integrity of the House" and refusing to answer whether he'd actually switch his registration to independent.
There may still be more twists to come. If Rozzi becomes independent and Democrats win the three special elections to fill the seats vacated by Davis, DeLuca, and Lee, the Pennsylvania House would be split evenly, 101–101–1.
Pennsylvania has had at least one House speaker from a minority faction. From 2007 through 2008, then-Rep. Dennis O'Brien (R–Philadelphia) served as speaker while Democrats held a one-seat majority in the House. But Rozzi would be the first independent to hold the gavel in the Pennsylvania House's history.*
In other states, there are a few precedents, according to Mick Bullock, a spokesman for the National Conference of State Legislatures. The most recent example, Bullock tells Reason, came from Alaska, where Rep. Bryce Edgmon (I–Dillingham) left the Democratic Party to become speaker in a coalition government formed in 2019.
As American politics becomes more fragmented, the ability to forge coalitions defined by something other than partisan loyalty may become more important. That can only be a good thing for the future of democracy.
And if Rozzi can live up to his promises on Tuesday, he'll be someone to watch.
CORRECTION: This piece misstated the age of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in the headline and text. The first session was held in 1682.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
There are no such things as "independents".
If there were, the Republicans would run the Senate.
49 Republicans
48 Democrats
3 Independents
Amazing! I beat Google!
But appearances matter more than function to libertarian editors.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link------------------------------------>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
"There are no such things as “independents”.
If there were, the Republicans would run the Senate."
That seems a strange assertion. Do you contend independents should be denied a vote in legislative leadership elections?
If they were true independents, Artie, then they'd either caucus by themselves or flirt between the parties. The independents do no such thing and choose only one side the caucus with. They are Democrats in everything but name.
If they don't get to vote in legislative leadership elections, and can't choose with whom to caucus . . . any other restrictions dumbasses have in mind for independents?
Never said they can't pick who to vote with. They're Democrats in all but name as they've chosen to swear their allegiance to one party without actually being of that party. If they were true independents, Artie (and I'll make this simple so your small mind can comprehend), they would hold out and make the parties kowtow to them. Without them, neither has 50%. With them, one can have 51%. They choose, without any bidding, without any debate, without any compromises to caucus solely with one party. Hence, they're Democrats in all but name.
Is that simple enough for you Artie, from one of your betters?
You're assuming independents must be centrist, but 2 of the Is in the Senate are independent because the Democrats aren't far enough left for them (and the third just doesn't want to rock the boat more than she already has,
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.WORKSCLICK.COM
If the dude is truly an independent, then that is awesome!
If he's simply a party member who calls himself and independent, then meh.
ruled that "an individual must at least be elected and living to qualify as a member of a legislative caucus." Therefore, Democrats did not have the majority.
Petty rules.
That exact pettifoggery was resorted to to keep Hank the Hallucination off the U. of Texas Student Council Presidency ballot. Yet Sam Hurt's fictional creation won handily. The election of course was rigged to favor candidates who actually existed. All of this was during the perigee of antinuclear fanaticism that took over the campus when Petr Beckmann was writing for Reason.
Home earnings allow all people to paint on-line and acquire weekly bills to financial institutions. Earn over $500 each day and get payouts each week instantly to account for financial institutions. (bwj-03) My remaining month of earnings was $30,390 and all I do is paint for as much as four hours an afternoon on my computer. Easy paintings and constant earnings are exquisite with this job.
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
Editor alert!!! Those two adverbs are useless and arguably wrong and misleading.
Everything in life is unpredictable one way or another. And everything recorded for history is historic. The term "pre-historic" literally applies before writing allowed recording history as it happened.
You get paid by the word? Or do you just like tarting up your writing to seem more important?
More fruit of the poisoned Mastriano tree.
The crux of this issue was that the three seats are heavy Ds, so once the special elections ate held, it will go back to 102-101. The reason it matters is that the speaker sets the calendar for special elections and the outgoing speaker tried to make them for the latest possible date (the Ds wanted the earliest possible date).
Why does this matter? The Rs want to get some constitutional changes about abortion on the ballot (because they will be the minority party soon) and they aren't subject to the Governor's veto. They thought they had plenty of time, but now they know they don't and are trying an end-run around the will of the voters.
Mitch McConnell is so proud!
I think the Anti-Choice crowd really screwed the Republicans throughout this entire election. What other reason would people vote to keep National Sozialists(Nazi's) in control after they clearly tanked the economy as they always do.
Yeah, probably didn't help. But it seems like dogma in nice easily digestable sound bights is an irresistible drug. Catering to the fringe gets you air time and clicks, but it leaves the centre with a "meh".
The Constitutional Amendment on abortion is DOA, as a half dozen pro choice Republicans have already said they'd vote against it.
Although this fact has been known since election day, Democrats and the left wing news media continue to hype the issue (to demonize Republicans).
As a pro choice Republican (who correctly predicted the day after Dobbs decision was leaked to the media that Mastriano would lose big and that Democrats might take control of the PA House),
I'm pleased the House Republicans no longer have enough votes to enact the Constitutional Amendment on abortion, nor enough votes to ban abortion outright).
While this article (like nearly all articles by the left wing PA media) has praised this selection of a so called Independent PA House Speaker, the newly elected Speaker still hasn't indicated who he'll appoint to be Committee Chairs (which could be all Rs, all Ds, or a combination thereof), how many Rs and Ds will be on each committee, and whether or not he'll allow votes to be taken on several different Constitutional Amendments that the PA Legislature already approved last session (including one that requires a government ID to vote, including by mail in ballot), which would allow PA voters to decide their fate during the next the next election.
I suspect that the new PA Speaker will not follow through on his promises to the dozen House Republicans (who voted for him), he'll give Democrats control of all Committees, and he won't allow any of the Republican's Constitutional Amerdments to be voted on (until after Democrats have a majority of House seats).
Once again, it appears that the Rs got snookered by Democrats.
Let's see. The sensible thing would be to give half the committee chairmanships to the Republicans, but these are politicians.
Voters may now get a glimmer of an idea. Either half--God's Grabbers Of Pussy or East German Democraticrepublicans--can only put forth a shrieker: Enslave Pregnant Women! Make Electricity Illegal! Suddenly, the idea of voting libertarian may become a thinkable thing.
I earn $100 per hour while taking risks and travelling to remote parts of the world. I worked remotely last week while in Rome, Monte Carlo, and eventually Paris. I’m back in the USA this week. I only perform simple activities from this one excellent website. see it,
Click Here to Copy…… http://Www.Smartcash1.com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ… Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ… Mᴀᴋᴇ $80 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $13000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ… Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ:) GOOD LUCK.:)
.
.
See this article for more information————————>>>GOOGLE WORK