Oregon's Governor Commutes Sentences of All State Death Row Inmates
Brown: “The state should not be in the business of executing people.”

Outgoing Democratic Oregon Gov. Kate Brown announced Tuesday she'd be commuting the sentences of 17 people remaining on the state's death row to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
"I have long believed that justice is not advanced by taking a life, and the state should not be in the business of executing people—even if a terrible crime placed them in prison," she said in a prepared statement.
Oregon hasn't executed a prisoner since 1997. Under current Oregon law, only a conviction for aggravated murder is punishable by death (and this punishment is enshrined in the state's constitution). In 2019 Brown signed a bill that restricted the use of the death penalty even further, applying it only to murders in cases of terrorist acts by members of organized groups, killings of children, murders by people already incarcerated for murder, and premeditated murder of police officers.
Brown extended a total moratorium on executions put into place in 2011 by her predecessor, Democratic Gov. John Kitzhaber. Brown is leaving office due to term limits, and Gov. Elect Tina Kotek, also a Democrat, has said she'll continue to extend the moratorium.
In a brutal sort of symmetry, 17 people have been executed in other states this year. They all took place in five states—Texas, Oklahoma, Arizona, Missouri, and Alabama—all through lethal injections. Mississippi is set to execute Thomas Edwin Loden Jr., 58, this evening for raping and killing a teenage girl in 2000. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, he's the last execution scheduled for the year.
Brown is blunt in her statement that the commutations aren't about whether those convicted have shown themselves deserving of mercy but instead about the flaws of the death penalty itself:
Unlike previous commutations I've granted to individuals who have demonstrated extraordinary growth and rehabilitation, this commutation is not based on any rehabilitative efforts by the individuals on death row. Instead, it reflects the recognition that the death penalty is immoral. It is an irreversible punishment that does not allow for correction; is wasteful of taxpayer dollars; does not make communities safer; and cannot be and never has been administered fairly and equitably.
President Joe Biden could follow in Brown's footsteps if he chose to do so. He campaigned on a promise to work on ending the federal death penalty (which he once supported). That's not quite what has happened. The Justice Department in July 2021 implemented a temporary moratorium on executions (even as it also fought for the authority to execute Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev). A bill to end the federal death penalty has stalled in Congress. But Biden is well within his authority to echo Brown and commute the sentences of the 79 prisoners currently on federal death row.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job csx07 online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,125 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link————————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
I’m currently generating over $35,100 a month thanks to one small internet job, therefore I really like your work! I am aware that with a beginning cdx05 capital of $28,800, you are cdx02 presently making a sizeable quantity of money online.
Just Check ———>>> http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
love the outcome, question the power-mongering
No no. This is the good type of executive rule.
I’ll repeat from earlier thread. Capital punishment is still the law as well as part of their constitution.
Broad base use if executive privilege not given particularity of a case or individual should not be widely applauded just because you agree with the outcome.
The cheering is the same as students cheering Biden for the student loan program. Reason has articles against that, but then change their view here. That is not a principled stance.
You can argue against the death penalty without compromising other supposed ideals and even encouraging executive overrides as done by Scott.
President Joe Biden could follow in Brown's footsteps if he chose to do so. He campaigned on a promise to work on ending the federal death penalty (which he once supported).
This is just unprincipled.
agreed. perhaps my disagreement with the governor's overreach was not expressed enough-ly?
How is this action "overreach"? This would seem to be expressly within her authority as governor. Like the president for federal crimes, governors can pardon or commute state crimes for any reason or none.
understood. overreach imho because the legislature says "Oregon has the Death Penalty" ... so campaign to rid the state of the death penalty (yay!) ... but pen-and-phone the collective lot of those already convicted (der?)
like I said, love the outcome, question the power-mongering.
Because the announcement is a generalized action. Basically the governor overriding both the state constitution and legislature.
I posted a link in the roundup that talks to precedence. Basically the Executive can't simply ignore laws it doesn't like generally. Even prosecutor discretion has to be individualized.
I remodelled $700 per day exploitation my mobile partly time. I recently got my fifth bank check of $19632 and every one i used to be doing is to repeat and paste work online. This home work makes Pine Tree State able to generate more money daily simply straightforward to try and do work and regular financial gain from this are simply superb.
Here what i’m doing. strive currently.................>>> onlinecareer1
my Facebook friend, a world-renowned legal ethicist, made these comments.
https://ethicsalarms.com/2022/12/14/oregons-governor-spares-17-murderers-who-deserve-to-die/
I have had mixed feelings on the death penalty for many years. My principal concerns over the death penalty is even if you reserve it for the most egregious of cases, bad actors within the justice system might coerce confessions, withhold evidence or railroad defendants. So can you put up guardrails that says the death penalty will only be applied in cases where It Is Known In The Absolute that the person was guilty… again, even in cases of “confession”, this might be tainted.
However, on the ‘pro’ side, to say there aren’t any benefits is, in my opinion, incorrect. For instance, I was just watching a documentary last night where a man was convicted of murdering a young woman. It was suspected that he was involved in half a dozen other killings, but proof was lacking to try him on those other cases. The state sidled up to him on his murder conviction and whispered “death penalty” in his ear, and he sprang his ass into action and led authorities to the bodies of several other victims, which at least gave the victims’ families some amount of closure. All this in exchange for life in prison. The death penalty may not be a deterrent, but boy howdy, killers sure like to avoid it.
>>led authorities to the bodies of several other victims
this is the point my s.o. makes every time I say no state should have the power ... is difficult to argue against the "bargaining chip" angle
that the death penalty is immoral.
Nope. A twisted opinion based not upon FACT.
God's Word plainly demands the death penalty for those who have murdered. Accidental deaths eveen due to negligence are another category and there are biblical safeguards against that.
A murderer MUST be declared guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and must also be upon the sworn testimony of two or more witnesses WHO HAVE CLEAN HANDS. This eliminates a good number of the witnesses produced by the prosecutors who all too often bribe sketchy "witnesses" who have something to gain by singing the desired song in front of the jury. Case in point, the use of the prosecution in the George Zimmerman case of that woman whom they claimed to have been the same woman who was talking by phone with the soon-dead Martin kid but who was not only not that woman but had no relation to the case whatever, a total fabrication who swore she WAS that woman when she and the dirty prosecutor KNEW absolutely she was not. As far as I know that prosecutor never faced any consequences for the most egregious example of felony perjury and false prosecution and witness tampering ever. The FACT he is not in prison along with that female impersonator/perjuror is a blotch on our criminal justice system. Far too many such cases of false witnesses.
STILL none of this changes the fact that murder warrants the death penalty.
some make much of the "cost" or lethal injection What a farce!!! I had to "go under" for som surgery a few years back, the bill for the injection that knocked me out was a ridiculous $150 or so. I was so far out tey could have tossed me into a huge meat grinder and I never would have known. If I gt knocked cold for an hour or so for a buck and a half, WHY does it cost so much more for a convicted murderer? Once knocked out by that injection they feel nothing, are aware of nothing, cannot respond or remember a thing. Run hydrochloric acid to stop their heart, they won't know. "Cruel and unusual"? Nah.
“God’s Word”
Do not give a flying fuck about the “word” of your imaginary friend, who is a genocidal sociopath who orders fathers to murder their sons for shits and giggles, or drowns the entire world because he’s having an insecure temper tantrum.
+1
She looks like a lich. She can't devour their souls if they're already dead.
she looks like that press sexretary Peppermint Patty +30 years.
applying it only to murders in cases of terrorist acts by members of organized groups
Phew... man I was really worried Oregon didn't take January 6 seriously.
I remain reluctant to completely eliminate the death penalty and do not believe that the state should NEVER kill a convicted criminal. For me the issue revolves around the terrible track record of government convictions of innocent - or at least innocent of the crime they were charged with - people. If we execute a convicted criminal and then find out later that they were not guilty of the crime, the punishment cannot be undone. On the other hand, there are cases - at least theoretically - where there is no doubt of the guilt of the convicted criminal.
"I remain reluctant to completely eliminate the death penalty and do not believe that the state should NEVER kill a convicted criminal."
Likewise agree.
My personal experience informs me that if New York, at the time it happened, had had a death penalty, and the convicted murderer, a well known, oft-convicted gang-banger (guilty of murdering his ex-girlfriend and his unborn child), then my sister-in-law, his next victim after his escape from prison, might still be alive.
On the other hand, the actual sentence of death seems to be rather inconsistently doled out, to say the least.
“Brown: “The state should not be in the business of executing people.””
Unless they fail to obey the shouted, often contradictory, commands of police officers.
Or they lawfully defend their lives and homes against the homicidal terrorism of her precious AntiFa/BLM brownshirts.
Unlike previous commutations I've granted to individuals who have demonstrated extraordinary growth and rehabilitation, this commutation is not based on any rehabilitative efforts by the individuals on death row. Instead, it reflects the recognition that the death penalty is immoral.
I know this is going to sound old-fashioned and pedantic, but isn't the morality or immorality of a particular punishment something better decided by the legislature than an outgoing governor? I mean, I think one of the other writers here was lamenting the decline of democratic decision-making. This sure seems like an example to me.
Well, she commuted the sentences... that's within her power. She didn't say, "From here going forward, there shall be no ___________".
Everyone knows that real true justice comes not from a jury of one's peers but from popularly elected strongmen with the will to power.
Anybody else find it interesting that the people most likely to find the death penalty immoral are hardcore abortion fanatics? From a logical standpoint, you'd think that sanctity of life moral position would find a person supporting the life of an unborn human and a human on death row. The mental gymnastics of progressives never fails to baffle me.
Yes.
“From a logical standpoint, you’d think that sanctity of life moral position would find a person supporting the life of an unborn human and a human on death row.”
Yep. While I support most abortion rights (bodily autonomy), and at least some instances of executions, I have found this seeming irrationality quite curious. But, in truth, while perhaps not as obvious as in this instance, such “irrationality” happens across the political spectrum.
“The state should not be in the business of executing people.”
Good point. That should be the job of the victim's family.
One person should not have that kind of power.
A quick search didn’t show what the 17 did. I didn’t search specific names but if some journalist did so I’d read about it.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/6910517/kate-brown-oregon-death-row-inmates/
I do believe that the state has the legal and moral right to execute people who have committed the most heinous of crimes. However, I don't have enough faith in the justice system to support executing pretty much anyone. Tim McVeigh was justified, but he's an exception.
I remodelled $700 per day exploitation my mobile partly time. I recently got my fifth bank check of $19632 and every one i used to be doing is to repeat and paste work online. This home work makes Pine Tree State able to generate more money daily simply straightforward to try and do work and regular financial gain from this are simply superb.
Here what i’m doing. strive currently.................>>> onlinecareer1
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://www.worksclick.com
Good idea.
And regardless of the hypothetical arguments for and against, of the 17 people executed in 2022, 2 were very probably innocent, the guilt of another 2 by no means certain, and a few of the rest should not have been eligible for the DP, notwithstanding guilt.
“ Brown: “The state should not be in the business of executing people.””
Right. This Communist sociopath believes that is the sole domain of her AntiFa brownshirts.
That Reason keeps flailing to hold this totalitarian cunt up as some bastion of Libertarian ideals is as telling as it is pathetic.