Are Socialists Taking Over? Interview With Whole Foods' John Mackey
"I have muzzled myself ever since 2009....Pretty soon you're going to be hearing about Crazy John, who's no longer muzzled."

The co-founder and retired CEO of Whole Foods, John Mackey, built a grocery store empire by embracing what he calls "conscious capitalism"—a management style that focuses on the higher purpose of a business and how it creates value not just for shareholders but for customers, employees, and other "stakeholders." Mackey has appeared in Reason's pages many times, including a landmark 2005 debate with Nobel laureate Milton Friedman and Cypress Semiconductor founder T.J. Rodgers about the social responsibility of business. For more on the ways that debate has evolved, check out Samuel Gregg's "Rise of the Stakeholders" (page 32).
In July, Reason's Nick Gillespie caught up with Mackey at FreedomFest 2022 in Las Vegas, Nevada, not long before Mackey's retirement.
Q: How did Whole Foods keep it together during the pandemic?
A: There were massive disruptions, and it was a very difficult time. The lockdowns, I believe history will show, were probably the stupidest thing that the government will have done in the 21st century unless they get into a nuclear war. It was idiotic. It was very hard on the morale of the company. Our team members were scared about being exposed to COVID.
Q: Has morale improved at Whole Foods?
A: I am retiring from Whole Foods in just six weeks. I leave on September 1, after 44 years. I've been on a grand tour to say goodbye to all 10 of our regions and I have been in over 100 stores in the last couple of months saying goodbye. Morale is very high. I think because things have normalized, meaning people are not having to wear masks. They are able to hug and touch again. Team meetings have come back. I think it's kind of the joy of surviving. Life is precious, and you realize that you still got it.
Q: Your life's work is in markets and building value. How did you stay out of politics?
A: I have muzzled myself ever since 2009. I wrote that Wall Street Journal piece that created this huge controversy about Obamacare with my board. I just thought we needed to innovate in health care, not one-size-fits-all, which is what Obamacare is really about. My board basically shut me down. And I was intimidated enough to shut up.
Well, I was telling my leadership team, pretty soon you're going to be hearing about Crazy John, who's no longer muzzled.
Q: Is your biggest concern that everything is more politicized?
A: My concern is that I feel like socialists are taking over. They're marching through the institutions. They're taking everything over and taking over education. It looks like they've taken over a lot of the corporations. It looks like they've taken over the military. And it's just continuing. I'm so deeply concerned about it. I believe in liberty and capitalism. Those are my twin values.
Q: What are your plans for when you retire?
A: Three things. First, I'm working on another book. This will be the whole story. The story of Whole Foods. It's going to be my most important book. It is going to be narrative, not didactic. It's going to be entertaining and funny, because there's so many great stories. Secondly, I'm going to do a lot more backpacking. I've got a hiking trip planned in Europe starting in Austria, 488 miles. Thirdly, I'm co-founding another business with some friends. It's going to be called Love Life! It's not ready for prime time yet, but it's going to be a combination of healthy restaurants, wellness centers, gyms, spas, and lifestyle medicine. We're going to create a whole chain of those.
The best thing is I get to be more activist as a libertarian. That's been suppressed. I am going to be more active. I'm going to be a lot more visible.
This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity. For a podcast version, visit reason.com.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "John Mackey on Life After Whole Foods."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
As Koch / Reason libertarians, our philosophy exists to make billionaires even richer. It's therefore natural for us to be suspicious of genuine, committed socialists. But just look at what passes for a "socialist" in the US these days. Bernie? AOC? Reason commenter "American Socia1ist"?
ROFL
The fact is that modern American socialism is a harmless lifestyle brand for people who want to pretend they're rebels — even as they vote for the candidates billionaires support (Biden), and advocate the policies billionaires want (open borders), while doing what defense contractors tell them to do (spend billions on proxy war).
#LibertariansForAOC
OMG! We currently have a President who was endorsed by all the coolest socialist YouTubers! I guess that means billionaires are in trouble because Biden's going to seize their wealth and give it to the working class! 🙁
Except ........... no. Not at all. 🙂
In 2022 Democrats have raised the minimum wage by: $0.00 / hour
In 2022 Reason.com benefactor Charles Koch's net worth has increased by: $4.9 billion
#VoteDemocratToHelpCharlesKoch
#VoteDemocratToKeepPoorPeoplePoor
#KeepTheBlacksInTheirPlace
#AndShitOnHispanicsAndAsiansWhoLeaveTheReservation
#InTheMeantimeInBetweenTimeAintWeGotFun
"modern American socialism is a harmless lifestyle brand for people who want to pretend they’re rebels"
Sounds like how Reason writers cosplay as libertarians.
Q: Is your biggest concern that everything is more politicized?
A: My concern is that I feel like socialists are taking over.
Somebody doesn’t get the importance of “both sides”.
Sarc and White Mike will be along soon to tell us.
As soon as they get their talking point this morning. Not so sure those emails have gone out yet.
They’re busy in the homeless thread masturbating to fantasies of being doxed.
Who would bother?
He didn’t say Democrats taking over. He said socialists taking over.
OK, how do we tell the difference?
Are you trying to imply there's a difference?
If you ignore the DNC and Joe Biden campaign sites, there us a difference.
Socialists ar win total control of the DNC and run anyone out who dissents. Look at how your fellow travelers bullied Manchin and Sinema.
Reason really, really has a hard-on for this guy. They love how he was completely overwhelmed in a debate with Milton Friedman 17 years ago. He was utterly out of his depth with a man who understood economics and liberty to a degree Mackey never could, to the extent that he doesn't even realize how badly Friedman owned him. Reason loves that even though they don't seem to realize how badly he looked in the debate with Friedman.
Reasons picks for teen reason covers is always confusing. Amash, Polis, McMuffin...
How many businesses did Uncle Miltie build?
Mackey is a pragmatist, as one needs to be in the real world. Let’s see what he says now that he is in-muzzled (since Sept 1, the interview was July)
Yeah, how many CEOs out there actually talk like Ayn Rand heroes?
The same number as the number of inventions patented by Einstein - Zero.
He seems pretty okay to me. I'm sure there are things we disagree on, but directionally seems right enough.
Heck, I even miss Reagan Democrats!
Are socialists taking over?
With a freedom index of Japan, More monetary-money going to Daddy-Gov than Living Expenses, An unsustainable debt, Fake fiat-money, The feds regulating every industry ever to exist (housing, energy, food)....
To pretend the USA isn't already more socialist than capitalist would be an assumption that runs against all the evidence.
I think the more important question to ask at this point in time is how the socialists conquered the USA and how to fix the treasonous invasion without a civil war. Or in specific terms how to ensure HONORABLE justices as well as politicians who honor the U.S. Constitution as they swore an oath to do instead of criminals who swore to do one thing and then proceeds to endlessly and consistently do the exact opposite of the sworn oath of office (treasonous).
Unfortunately the USA is pretty darn capitalist now. What it lacks is free enterprise. It and other countries have tended to become capitalist as the Marxists meant it: ruled by (the owners of) capital. Fortunately we still have a great degree of free enterprise, just much less than we'd like, and a hefty dose of forced redistribution running against what we'd like.
What it lacks is free enterprise. .
Fortunately we still have a great degree of free enterprise, …
Which is it?
"Lack" does not mean total absence. We don't have as much as we'd want. Fortunately we still have a lot of it.
LOL
You don't believe me? Look at all the businesses. Most of the largest are publicly owned. Of the smaller ones, think about the choices their founders had: a vast number.
Are there degrees of freedom though?
There are clearly degrees of English.
In that case, it’s spelled “cocoa”. Mofo.
We hear this kind of fluff often from people like Mackey but they never get specific about what they mean by "socialism". Which industries are being seized by government? Where is the specific problem? Does he mean an entitlement system run amok instead? Tell him to advise the GOP to trim back our two biggest - Social Security and Medicare then, Run on reducing benefits by at least 50%. Let's actually cut spending FOR ONCE. Okay? Defense, entitlements, bureaucracy - put it all on the table.
Go for it, Mackey. Show us you have a set. Because you are just whining if you don't.
He's too old for you, pervert.
A few years back you posted kiddy porn to this site, and your initial handle was banned. The link below details all the evidence surrounding that ban. A decent person would honor that ban and stay away from Reason. Instead you keep showing up, acting as if all people should just be ok with a kiddy-porn-posting asshole hanging around. Since I cannot get you to stay away, the only thing I can do is post this boilerplate.
https://reason.com/2022/08/06/biden-comforts-the-comfortable/?comments=true#comment-9635836
That's "all the evidence", is it?
50%?! Heck, it'd be a great achievement just to trim off 5%, or even arrest its growth on a per capita basis.
People who have no plans to retire say these things.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Sevo, we are relieved to see your unhinged copy-and-pastes back.
We suspected you had attacked the Pelosi family - that is if you were not working the Tenderloin again over the weekend.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
You joke, but I'm glad to see him. Sevo's the Reason Comments Section Bulldog. I've grown to appreciate him over the years. Sometimes, the correct response to assholes isn't to debate them, but to just tell them to fuck off.
Especially when those assholes link to child pornography and constantly lie.
Made you look.
Boy, have to disagree. Sevo’s “fuck off”’s have always been in the twitchiest of hair triggers. He is one of the people who made the commentariat a cesspool before the mute button came along. He rarely ever contributed any accurate information or serious debate to any topic.
Cite?
And you did, and do? All you contribute is distractions and strawmen.
You remind me of a guy I know who likes starting religious arguments, but as soon as he realizes he's backed himself into a corner, his response is only "God moves in mysterious ways".
Fuck off, distracter.
"He is one of the people who made the commentariat a cesspool"
Sevo's practically Oscar Wilde compared to your trolling and shitposting, Mike.
You. Jeff. And sarc are the primary reasons for the cesspool. Just gaslighting sea lions not interested in actual debate.
You. Jeff. And sarc are the primary reasons for the cesspool.
Let's not undersell our cesspool here.
No love from JesseAz for Buttplug or Tony. 🙁
Yeah, there's Misek and Kirkland, too.
Your comment about Sevo being gone last night aged about as well as moldy bread.
No, it was some sick fucking pervert leftist, like you. Maybe Pelosi and his hook up were fighting over who got to rape some little boy first. Do you have a system that you and your NAMBLA friends use to decide who goes first?
He means stop looking at and posting child porn and kill yourself
We'll ignore Obamacare - because I guess when the USSC says that as long as you don't control more than 80% of what a company does its not actual government ownership.
And we'll ignore rail companies - that have been socialized in the past and even today the government has *by law* given the rail unions more power over the company than the company management.
Let's also forget the mandates for phone companies.
I think they're more fascist. Private ownership, public control.
Sure, we have a loud contingent of socialists and socialist wanna-bees. But I suggest we have an establishment that is essentially statist and nanny-Karen, and generally agnostic about economic or moral philosophy. They are more about control, and driven by a core value that control is good and more control is better. I guess that makes for a really big tent (and poses at least as much of a threat to liberty as true socialists).
We're facing a weird new chimerical monster. An aristocratic class empowering and justifying itself through social Marxism.
Socialism has always been party control by designated elites.
Again, I see many people who claim (and think they do) want "capitalism" and reject socialism, but push for more state management of the economy (and society).
Socialism is just technical authoritarian now. Institutions have proclaimed society will be better under technocrats. Give up your choices to others using algorithms. Give up your freedoms to the intellectuals. Same outcome, different name.
The US hasn't been a free market in a century. Capitalism relying mostly on government funding outside of a few entities.
There's the socialism that was a program to prepare people for eventual communism, and then there's the socialism that's an end goal. The technocrats you're referring to probably aim at the latter.
There is no difference between the things you're talking about.
'Socialism to prepare people for eventually communism' never, ever arrives at the 'communism'. It always ends up with socialism simply being the end goal, where a massively empowered centralized state uses the fig leaf of communal ownership to do whatever the fuck they want.
In zero cases will 'the people' be making a single decision for themselves, and they will never 'arrive' at the communist paradise they are promised.
Are you suggesting real communism hasn’t been tried?
I don’t doubt that they try to get there, but those who steer the ship there end up falling in love with the power they accumulate on the way. They mean bad things but can’t help producing even worse things.
No I am not saying that. I'm saying that trying to draw a line in the sand between two identical things is a waste of time.
And you really should doubt that they 'try to get there' since notably, they aren't trying to do anything of the sort. There are plenty of successful communes right here in the U.S. that do just fine, one cannot say the same of places like the USSR or even China.
Real communism is as anarchistic as anarcho-capitalism, neither of which will actually work in the real world.
The difference in the result may not be so great, but the difference in the intention is important here. A socialist in power who aims at communism isn’t going to give up socialism and allow free enterprise unless forced to by extraordinary means. Socialists who just want socialism as an end in itself allow themselves to be voted out of power. BigT seems to understand the dynamic in play there.
This book I've been reading, Highway Heist, is the history of roads in the US since 1787 with respect to how the feds ended up running so much of it, beginning with amending "establish post offices" by adding "and post roads", which was such an alarming prospect it only passed by one vote. And sure enough, it was the first wedge used to justify federal roads and federal road subsidies. Later the Commerce and Necessary and Proper clauses came into play.
Statism has been expanding the US federal government since before the Constitution was adopted. It's how government works.
Because capitalism (rule by capital) entails some merger of state and capital ownership. Why people started using "capitalism" to mean "free enterprise", I don't know.
entails some merger of state and capital ownership
Idiot with no money.
How else would you get capitalism, i.e. rule by capital, except by such a merging? What did you think "-ism" meant?
Nobody knows what you are talking about. You in particular, don’t know what you are talking about.
^ Basically this.
Notably, nowhere that has tried 'socialism' has ended up with the 'proletariat' having any actual power or say in anything whatsoever. The rulers of those places like to claim the people 'have power' but in reality they have zero say and zero vote in how anything actually works.
Functionally, 'socialism' is merely another word for centralized authoritarianism with a thin veneer of 'power to the people'. Actual outright authoritarian nations don't bother with the veneer and just come right out and say FYTW instead of pretending to give a fuck.
I like to think of three styles of authoritarian government: kings who don't give a fuck and don't justify squat; socialists who at least are honest enough to outright appropriate private property; and fascists who hide behind a facade of private property whose owners have no say in its control, or are the political leaders.
They all come down to the same thing, of the elite telling everyone else what to do.
You are all wrong! True socialism has never been tried. Mao lennin Stalin polpot Che Castro et AL. They were just pretenders and didn't do socialism hard enough
They were being held back by the non believers!
Well, that one guy did try New Socialism, so maybe THIS time…oh no! Et tu, Hugo? Et tu?
I agree on the point about control, specifically their in-group being in control. That said, if one examines the donations made by the 'rank and file' government employees, the establishment is not simply nanny-statist Karen types. They are overwhelmingly donating to organizations and causes that allow one to see beliefs, philosophy. The vast majority are not libertarian, centrist, or right-leaning.
"Stakeholders" is bullshit, you gotta have skin in the game. Government has no skin in the game. There's your whole problem right there. Start chopping off heads for failure to perform.
I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction
On the given website.........>>> Topcitypay
It seems our progressive #Resistance allies have found their closing message before the midterms: because of the horrific attack on Pelosi's husband, Nancy is now completely off-limits for criticism.
To those who have vilified @SpeakerPelosi for years, shame on you. Please stop now.
#LibertariansAgainstCriticizingPowerfulPoliticians
#SoWhatIfPaul’sAPerv
It's not perverted just because when Nancy's out of town Paul likes to engage in a little of the drug-fueled rough trade. Hunter taught him to be big and bold and upfront about your fetishes.
#LibertariansForRestrictedSpeech
Yeah, because I'm sure the loony toon that attacked was listening to a ton of Republican propaganda at his nudist commune or whatever the fuck it was.
Lets be perfectly clear here: if it was a Republican attempt it would have been a high caliber round aimed at Nancy. At least if you believe all the hype that Democrats say about gun-happy loose-cannon Republicans, that is.
It's an emotional appeal on the part of Democrats who, frankly, don't appear to like Nancy all that much either since they keep talking about 'new blood' taking her place even though most of them vote in lock step with Pelosi anyway.
The thing we should probably be worried about is if Nancy is actually keeping the more extreme parts of the party from taking over. What takes her place could easily be far, far worse.
LOL the guy had liberal bumper stickers and a rainbow marijuana flag, but the media can't seem to figure anything out but ELECTION DENIER!
Don’t you know, you can be a card carrying member of the Socialist party, marched in the OWS and BLM and Pussy Hat protest, identify as an Otherkin and if you think that anything hinkey went on in the 2020 election you’re a Trump worshiping alt-right cultist?
Twitter truly exposes some seriously delusional people. This was an actual response in that thread:
Yuri
@woland_666
·
21h
Replying to
@proto_
@McFaul
and
@SpeakerPelosi
The problem with your statement is that no one vilifies Trump.
"...that focuses on the higher purpose of a business..."
Sorry, but the highest purpose of a business is the bottom line.
What? Let business enterprises pander to the desires of customers? What if people want the wrong things?
Bingo. I get angry about CEO's yammering about SJW issues and never getting punished when they tank the stock. (Gillette, Coca Cola Disney). Every contract with a CEO should have an escape clause for stockholders. You cause losses, you forfeit tour "golden parachute".
"A: My concern is that I feel like socialists are taking over."
To bad he's retiring. The reply most CEOs would now give is "I'm helping the socialists take over".
Reason Rundown
In a spasm of genius the Fetterman campaign creates a hate hoax so obvious, even Biden wouldn't be fooled.
Remember when stealing Trump signs was cool?
You know who else has been burning things in public lately to make a political statement?
(finally got this in the right place)
The villagers near Castle Frankenstein?
Every activist with Chlamydia?
Indian farmers?
I was trying to think of a Roman reference, but I’m done fiddling around!
Sick burn!
I was so near oh near!
I really like the fact that the fetterman campaign, or it's running dog, was there just in time to get a picture. A perfectly lit picture, with half of the logo still legible. This could have been vandalism, but I am calling douchebag and hoax. I've been around vandalism, most people would have tossed a molotov at the center of the sign.
The Fetterman campaign obviously burned their own sign. If they'd just waited a minute or two before snapping the picture they might have gotten away with it.
Yes this was embarrassingly sloppy. Jussie Smollett levels of ridiculous.
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/of-all-the-things-that-didnt-happen
Sevo still has not posted since the attack at the Pelosi home.
San Fran resident - check
Trump Cultist - check
QAnon nutcase - check
unhinged rants on social media - check
A pair of web blogs posted in recent months online under the name David DePape contained rants about technology, aliens, communists, religious minorities and global elites.
An Aug. 24 entry titled “Q,” displayed a scatological collection of memes that included photos of the deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and made reference to QAnon, the baseless pro-Trump conspiracy theory that espouses the belief that the country is run by a deep state cabal of child sex traffickers, satanic pedophiles and baby-eating cannibals.
https://fortune.com/2022/10/29/who-is-david-depape-paul-pelosi-assault-hammer-qanon-nudist-racism/
Sevo posted something 5 minutes before you made yourself look ridiculous again.
What was hilarious is Mike and sarc were linking the Pelosi assassin to sevo yesterday even though they cry about being attacked constantly.
Sevo profiles as a 98% fit.
One-size straw man fits all.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Back in '03 when your righteous anger about the Iraq War was at its peak, did you ever imagine one day your political commentary would be virtually indistinguishable from Bill Kristol's?
You know what you call a movement that’s semi-ok with violence against its opponents? Semi-fascist.
I swear that guy's Twitter sounds like you wrote it — except he hasn't mastered your trademark potty humor.
Buttplug is a Bushie? I can see it.
By the measure of today Bush 2: Electric Boogaloo was positively centrist.
If Bush ran for office today, SPBP would probably vote for him.
Hilarious.
I thought he didn’t like bush, and that to have bush was too old for him.
Sevo is one of the greats here. It made this one article so long ago so excellent as well.
https://reason.com/2017/11/29/man-says-he-was-choked-defecated-himself/
Also, that article makes me sad. Only five years ago but we have the long gone Ed Krayewski writing (King of the Alt Text). We have Citizen X and Crusty Juggler and Chipper Morning all posting.
Man. Miss those guys.
Man, Leo Kovalansky and Red Tony too.
Reading the comments on that one are just bumming me out now. We were all so young!
Chipper went full anti trump and stopped being a good poster when he said marxism was closer to libertarianism than conservatives.
And of the more recent departures I miss John and Ken the most.
Chumbly is the biggest loss.
Yeah wtf happened to chumbly?
Ken was very good, John too. Ken posted short essays that were instructive.
I miss reading Ken’s essays as well. Agree or disagree, they were informative and interesting.
"What was hilarious is Mike and sarc were linking the Pelosi assassin to sevo yesterday even though they cry about being attacked constantly."
Hey, I live in the city where the crime was committed and to the 'thinkers' you mention, that's all they need!
Fuck 'em both with a running, rusty chainsaw.
Like, they thought Sevo was the person in the underwear with the hammer? That's dumb even for them.
oops
"Sevo still has not posted since the attack at the Pelosi home."
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Go take your Droxy, Sevo. You know you feel better when you obey Trump.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Just in time for Halloween
https://www.flickr.com/photos/194775987@N02/52463638783/
Shrike hates those things.
Buttplug still a perv; film at 11.
A few years back you posted kiddy porn to this site, and your initial handle was banned. The link below details all the evidence surrounding that ban. A decent person would honor that ban and stay away from Reason. Instead you keep showing up, acting as if all people should just be ok with a kiddy-porn-posting asshole hanging around. Since I cannot get you to stay away, the only thing I can do is post this boilerplate.
https://reason.com/2022/08/06/biden-comforts-the-comfortable/?comments=true#comment-9635836
Man, you really are retarded. It’s obviously not Sevo not matter how much you may want it to be. Maybe you came last night over the thought, I don’t know, but it obviously excited you.
Sorry Kiddie Raper, this guy is a Green Party nudist wacko Green Party hippie who makes hemp necklaces in SF. Does that sound like MAGA to you?
Just give up and commit suicide.
oops
Are we having shortages of food, fuel and stability? Are we having political prosecutions?
Coming soon.
“Are we having political prosecutions?”
Aside from the January 6 kangaroo courts? And the Trump impeachments?
“January 6 kangaroo courts”
Did the persons being convicted of crimes such as trespassing and assault not commit trespassing and assault, often videotaping themselves doing it, thereby providing the prosecutors with evidence to convict them?
The term “kangaroo court” has a meaning, and it’s not “I don’t like that they are trying people from my political team.”
Why are they still in jail with no bail?
Because we're too advanced a society to execute treasoners on the spot?
Yes Tony, let the hate flow through you.
Not all of us can be as cool and composed as you guys were about Muslim extremists after 9/11.
Yes Tony, we’ve known for years that you’re an Islamophobic war mongering Neocon.
Lefties sure like to bring up totally random shit when they’re exposed.
Except for the chick that was shot in the face.
Very few of those convicted have been convicted of assault retard. The most common conviction is parading.
And kangaroo court can also refer to one sided application of the laws. Which is what we are saying. Stop your idiocy.
Slit your wrists
"...The term “kangaroo court” has a meaning, and it’s not “I don’t like that they are trying people from my political team.”..."
Assholish sumbitch probably can't spell "protest" either.
You’re right, it isn’t a kangaroo court, it’s actually a show trial, like those in the old Soviet Union.
FBI raiding pro life protesters (while ignoring the firebombing of abortion alternative centers)
I just found several news articles saying the FBI is investigating.
Citations?
heh
I mean, they've pretty much taken over Reason, so ummmm, yeah!
Reason Rundown
Totes MAGA
Pelosi Attack Suspect Was A Psychotic Homeless Addict Estranged From His Pedophile Lover & Their Children
Right now I'm guessing Paul hooked up with DePape at a gay bar, scored some drugs and took him home. Things went south from there.
He got hammered.
"Where's Nancy? Where's Nancy?"
In D.C., establishing an alibi.
*LMAO!*
Ouch! He only wanted to get nailed…
Someone spiked his drink.
But he only drinks screwdrivers!
Riveting story about this nut. No wonder he bolted from the scene.
I saw what you did there.
Level with me, you're only in this for the shear joy of the puns.
You hit that one on the head! Shall we ply some more?
I’m board.
What if DePape is Tony?
He's a proud Oklahoman. He'd never sully himself with California. California is the land of Okies who couldn't hack it in Oklahoma.
Actually, what do a it’s Kirkland? Male prostitutes can be awfully clingy…
Mr Pelosi was apparently drunk when attacked. Story gets more strange by the revelation.
Was he heading out for a drive?
Maybe he was driving out for some head.
When his wife already sucks so much?
Mr Pelosi
wasis apparently always drunkwhen attacked.I don't know enough to say on that one. If I'm ever fabulously wealthy and in my 80s I'll probably sipping cocktails all day then too.
Til 2am with a guy in his underwear?
Yes, though in my case it will be my hunting buddies and we'll be drunk on Coors playing Turtles in Time.
4 player arcade?
Coors? At least your not drinking beer.
If I were rich, then yes, albeit with female prostitutes, not male
Meh. As I grow older. Day drinking becomes better.
I don't think it gets stranger, it gets more plausible
I mean, elderly gay dude goes to gay bar to pick up male prostitute , brings him home while drunk and has a fight with him is a really common thing.
Sounds like you have been hanging out with the San Francisco elite.
So did Depape have a bad trip and freak out while they were fucking?
Ohh, ouch, Shellenberger. We no longer listen to him, he's gone off the reservation in regards to police reform and safe injection sites. I think Reason is pulling his card out of their rolodex and throwing it in the shredder.
A closer look reveals the characteristics of a homeless encampment, or what Europeans call “an open drug scene.”
Ok, now THAT'S a line. Bravo.
Neighbors described DePape as a homeless addict with a politics that was, until recently, left-wing, but of secondary importance to his psychotic and paranoid behavior. “What I know about the family is that they’re very radical activists,” said one of DePape’s neighbors, a woman who only gave her first name, Trish. “They seem very left. They are all about the Black Lives Matter movement. Gay pride. But they’re very detached from reality.
Being all about Black Lives Matter and Gay Pride is to be detached from reality. There's no 'but' required here. But I get it... it's Berkely.
It’s kinda funny that lefty politics can't be distinguished from just plain nuts. The worst right wingers is preachers having affairs, or politicians keeping cash in freezers. But lefty politics is so unhinged (fluidentity mutilation, CO2 is bad, central planning works) that it becomes indistinguishable from nutjobs estranged from their pedo baby mamas.
The longest-serving Republican speaker of the house is a convicted child rapist.
And your point is?
I have no problem accepting that some leftwingers are pedophiles, but the problem is all the pedophiles I know by name are priests or Republicans.
You’re a goddamn liar.
Meet Ed Murray
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Murray_(Washington_politician)
Well, technically Sarah Palin’s Buttplug is an anonymous internet handle so you don’t know him by “name”.
I could probably list one hundred, But for the sake of brevity here's your Senate majority leader, George Mitchell (D), who was raping kids on Epstein's Lolita Express. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_J._Mitchell#Epstein_scandal
Now watch this video of Biden (D) groping a whole bunch of little girls: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XqF4wA-dco
And of course, Biden’s daughter Ashley details being molested by her father in the shower around age ten in her own diary. Believing that this was the source of early sexualization. Biden’s FBI has authenticated that the diary is indeed hers.
You mean a minor-attracted-person. Keep up, Tony.
The last Republican president is such a widely known child predator it's considered among the least of his crimes.
He is? We know for certain that Bill Clinton flew on Air Lolita.
The child predator I was talking about also had a well-documented relationship with Epstein.
Again the Clinton's. Trump kicked epstein out of mar a Lago when rumors of pedophilia started.
Amd again Tony pukes up discredited leftist lies. It’s all he’s got.
What reality would that be? That black people should be kept under the boot heel of the police and that gays deserve no rights?
You're all about worshipping at the nutsack of the most ridiculous orange clown to ever walk the face of the earth. Glass houses dude.
Kill yourself, and make the world a better place.
Making up claims of racism is so desperate. You’re just telegraphing that you have no argument. Because you’re filth, and you believe in filth.
America doesn’t have a racism problem.
America has a Marxism problem.
This has gotten really weird. There’s still
Some other questions about that night.
1. Who let the cops in? It wasn’t Pelosi, nor DePape.
2. Why was the glass in the window broken outwards?
3. Why are there three men there, with DePape in his undies?
There’s been some suggestion already about gay prostitution being involved,
Just to get the media story straight, a nudist hippie that was part of a pro BLM commune walked in only underwear from Berkeley to the ultrarich neighborhood in San Francisco, entered Paul Pelosi’s mansion while predator invisible cloaked to avoid security cameras…
https://twitter.com/ComfortablySmug/status/1586478880323702785
Well, he wouldn't be the first live-in partner of a major Democratic politician running a gay prostitution ring out of his crib.
Look at Lieutenant Colombo here.
I have muzzled myself ever since 2009. I wrote that Wall Street Journal piece that created this huge controversy about Obamacare with my board.
So Obamacare is 'socialism' but the TARP bailout of Wall St and billionaires in 2008 was not socialism. Ok. Got it. Transparently the problem with a social welfare 'safety net' is not the thing itself but the notion that poor people rather than rich people are the direct 'beneficiaries' of social largesse.
Golly gee. Wonder why 'free markets' are so 'misunderstood'. Are they free markets or are they socialism for me but not for thee?
Where did he say the TARP bailout wasn’t socialism?
He didn't say TARP is socialism. He didn't say Obamacare is socialism. Neither are socialism, but rather a redistribution of public funds to private entities, banks in one case, insurance companies in the other.
mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
"Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."
Fuck off and die, you stupid and smug pile of shit.
Both are closer to fascism. I notice that TARP was a stupid one time bipartisan bailout, whereas Obamacare was ongoing partisan cronyism. Much worse since we’ll be suffering for a long time from O’care’.
TARP cost $15 TRILLION dollars and is the main reason we had a decade worth of zero-interest money. There ain't temporary about it at all. That is simply an excuse to ignore it because the beneficiaries are people who live in the right neighborhoods.
Lol. Fact free jfree is back.
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/tg1121
TARP cost $15Trillion? How do you figure?
Poor jfree, lives in a shitty neighborhood.
"whereas Obamacare was ongoing partisan cronyism"
You mean bipartisan, don't you? Remember the oligarchy has two wings, and the health care insurance industry prospers no matter which is holding power. That's not the case in Canada where the industry is essentially nationalized and closer to actual socialism.
"Both are closer to fascism. "
So what? Fascism involves the state in a nation's economy. Just like every other country under any political system you care to name. Since when are you so squeamish about aping Fascist economics? You're completely down with tariffs and other protectionist measures that the Nazis used.
No, Obamacare was a wholly partisan law crafted by the insurance companies in conjunction with their Democrat benefactors. Every single one of you dem shills can choke on your own vomit for supporting insurance company bailouts.
"No, Obamacare was a wholly partisan law "
Republicans didn't repeal it when they had the chance. You rep shills should know this without me telling you.
Would that be the same Republican Party that voted in favor of removing the mandate? You know, the core component the Obama Administration put in at the behest of the insurance companies?
I will say this though, fuck all the RINO’s who bleated about how the government needed to have a plan in place before repealing that Democrat abortion.
"Would that be the same Republican Party that voted in favor of removing the mandate?"
The same. They had the chance to repeal this bit of crony capitalism but they chose not to. And schlubs like you bend over backwards to defend them.
Republicans tried. RINO filth stopped the repeal. With the help of every single democrat. As democrats are also filth.
"Republicans tried."
Sure they did. It seems you really don't understand what crony capitalism and oligarchy are all about. Why you insist on carrying water for the Republicans is pure tribalism.
Yeah, that's socialism. That is literally how its done all over the world.
Socializing losses, privatizing profits.
You're confused with crony capitalism, the system under an oligarchy. A socialized health insurance is not a 'socialized loss' it's a gain. In Canada, millions went from having no health insurance, to having it, all with the passage of some legislation. That's no loss, it's a gain. Other gains, like cheaper drug prices due to purchasing at scale, are also public rather than private.
So because he didn't say anything about TARP it must therefore mean he was for it, obviously.
Ok.
Why are you for overthrowing the government and installing a Catholic theocracy? I assume you must be for it, since you didn't call it out in this post.
"...So Obamacare is ‘socialism’ but the TARP bailout of Wall St and billionaires in 2008 was not socialism..."
Steaming pile of lefty shit should learn the difference between the printed word and the voices in his head.
Fuck off and die, chicken little.
He goes on to say in the next sentence that one of his big criticism of Obamacare is that it is “one size fits all” instead of creative and varied problem solving. Sounds like he has thought about it deeper than just “I don’t like it because it helps poor people.”
Once again trying to distract from the comment ("where was TARP even mentioned?") with strawmen.
"So Obamacare is ‘socialism’ but the TARP bailout of Wall St and billionaires in 2008 was not socialism. "
TARP is not socialism, it's redistribution of wealth, yes, but from the public to the private. TARP is crony capitalism, and comes naturally in an oligarchy. Obama's health care is at first glance socialism, but it's also a redistribution of wealth from the public to the private. Private insurance companies, in this case. Canada's health insurance is much closer to true socialism.
TARP was actually a redistribution of risk. The loans were paid back. Just at low rates. The program actually made a bit of profit. It was not a redistribution of money. ACA forces consumers into an economic arrangement they previously did not agree to.
" It was not a redistribution of money."
It was a redistribution of credit, which amounts to the same thing.
"ACA forces consumers into an economic arrangement they previously did not agree to."
One of the reasons why it's not socialism.
The thing with Obamacare is that it’s not socialism. It’s not a safety net. It’s giving billions to insurance companies who have created the problem of why our health care costs more than anywhere else in the world, despite not serving everyone
TARP was basically the same thing. Again, not socialism.
Socialism is the government owning industries
Just so we're clear, you think that insurance providers are the one's increasing rates?
I just want to be clear on that, since a sober look at the industry makes it pretty obvious that government interference in that particular market is easily the biggest driver of higher costs.
If you think this is the fault of insurance companies, it mean's you're simply regurgitating what the government is saying to you since they are quite happy to let the market take the blame for their own actions.
"If you think this is the fault of insurance companies,"
Of course not. They're innocent victims. And we love them.
When people got sick of spending too much on shitty insurance, government stepped and mandated it.
Any other self respecting oligarchy would have done the same. And schlubs like you bend over backwards to promote their interests.
So then, are insurance companies (or some equivalent crooks) also to blame for our spending on K-12 education (also near-highest per student, and with questionable results)?
"So then, are insurance companies (or some equivalent crooks) also to blame for our spending on K-12 education"
Who gives a shit about education? Don't you know that Trannies are after our toilets? Our toilets, man!
Is that follow-on question Nick's way of avoiding what the commentariat has been warning about for the last 7 to 10 years?
Sure. Nick Gillespie, shrinking violet. Always afraid to discuss delicate topics. Never prone to epic rants.
Once again trying a distraction. You really are a one trick pony.
Gillespie ain’t real bright, but still much smarter than you.
Who are you, again?
It says right there, BigT.
Not a squawking bird named Dee. Jealous?
Dee? That bitch!
Breaking: Kevin Spacey found 'not liable' in a sexual assault case. #HimToo
#BelieveAllMen
FFS, just tell me who NOT to believe.
Mike, jeffy, Tony, SPB
But doesn't his view of capitalism run contrary to what libertarians (and Republicans) value - focusing solely on creating profit and raising stock prices?
I mean, every time people want higher wages, the reply seems to "The real minimum wage is zero, just be lucky you have a job, peasant"
The real minimum wage is zero, but I can't help but notice artificially raising the price floor of labor turns out to make labor less attractive than automation in a whole host of industries.
Not to mention all those people who get fired and start making the real minimum wage every time it gets hiked up.
I'm sure the fewer employee's left who make the higher rate benefit, but it's equally certain the one's who lose their jobs entirely do not.
“focusing solely on creating profit and raising stock prices”
That’s more of a Milton Friedman economic thing, that a lot of investors agree with, not necessarily a libertarian thing.
Cite?
Ehh, technically, I would say that his view isn't in contradistinction to libertarianism at all. If he wants to start a company and run it with social justice in mind, he has every right to do that. Putting aside legal requirements for fiduciary responsibility etc., if he succeeds, more power to him, if he fails, then sucks for him.
I don't see it as "unlibertarian" to run his own company the way he wants. However, his view that everyone ELSE should ALSO run their corporations with his values is not particularly libertarian.
Yeah, the whole "focusing solely on creating profit and raising stock prices?" is assuming a whole lot of facts not in evidence.
Isn't this the guy who argued with Milton Friedman saying that corporations should do a bunch of socialist shit?
If it’s voluntary, it ain’t socialism. As long as the BOD agrees, anything goes.
Wow... fucking wow.
Inmates running the asylum.
You know who else polluted the German language with a bunch of ideological nonsense?
JFK?
Karl Marx?
Sargent Shultz?
But I thought this was about chromosomes. Do chairs have penises and lamps vaginas? Or is gender a linguistic concept after all?
Gender is a linguistic concept, masculine, feminine, or neuter. Sex is what a being is, male or female. We aren’t asexual bacteria.
I know that, and I suppose transgender people figured that calling themselves transexuals might confuse the matter, even though for all intents and purposes we rarely look into each other's DNA for our information about them.
transgender people figured that calling themselves transexuals might confuse the matter
Dumbest idea ever.
It is about chromosomes and testosterone and circulating estrogen and brain function and a whole host of other biological factors. Language developed around those facts. Changing the language won't make me believe you're a woman just because you're wearing womanface and refuse to use a thousand year old gendered language.
"Making the German language gender-neutral is easier said than done. "
Isn't there a line in the Importance of Being Earnest (Oscar Wilde) where Miss Prism, tells Cecily that the correct German is 'Das Fraulein?' A neuter noun, against all expectations and common sense? Sounds like German could do with some reforming of its demonstratives, and clean up the pronouns while they're at it.
"New word forms are therefore having to be invented to accommodate these demands."
They don't have to invent new word forms, but could also fall back on old pre-gendered forms, or borrow from their linguistic cousins who don't have gendered nouns like English. When Hebrew, a heretofore language of liturgy, and nothing else, was propelled into every day use by the founding of Israel, they found themselves in need of obscenities and curses. They didn't make new ones, but borrowed them wholesale from the Arabic of the streets, markets and bedrooms.
The Nazis originally agitated against communists. Republicans have called every advance in civil rights and the modern welfare state communist or socialist. Socialism was used as a proxy for atheism in the Cold War. Every single right-wing conspiracy theorist, fanatic, and fascist has made socialism their favorite boogiemonster, but only when they couldn't say "Jew" out loud and get away with it.
Left unargued is why it should be the business of the state what college students, corporate CEOs, military members, and entertainers believe about politics. If socialism really is taking over all these things, maybe it's simply succeeding in the marketplace of ideas. Against some pretty strong opposition, too.
I wonder why the people who protest so much in favor of individual free thought who are the quickest to use government force to suppress thought they don't like.
Different flavors of socialists always seem to feature struggle sessions against the other types.
Always. 100% of the time. It's weird, right?
What's a socialist?
Against some pretty strong opposition, too.
Yes, like some randos on twitter who got banned like James Dreyfus.
Are you not embarrassed that you decided to become creepily fixated on trans people at the exact same moment the entire Republican base did? Aren't you afraid it might give people the impression that you're a braying sheep?
When Twitter starts banning people for being capitalists, you would have your hypocrisy argument, and even then it would still be a meaningless distraction from the point.
I'm not focused on trans people... they are, however, creepily focused on my daughter.
All of them?
I wonder why the people who protest so much in favor of individual free thought who are the quickest to use government force to suppress thought they don’t like.
Since when is disinformation on the internet synonymous with thought?
You should know about disinformation, Tony, as you do a hell of a lot of it.
Well, either me or the crackpot rightwing blogs you get your news from.
Holy crap.
Da faq?
Hahahahahahahaha, never change Tony.
Man, we built our own twitter and now he's lost his fucking mind.
There is a long conceptual distance between robber baron and "conscious" capitalism. It is possible to be good to your employees while making enough profit to re-invest in your business to keep it competitive. You don't have to steal candy from babies or cheat at solitaire and, likewise, you don't have to fight global climate change or solve the homeless problem to be a responsible business operator and a charitable person. "Stakeholders" is a code word for virtue signaling. If you provide a reliable, safe product or service at the right price you will make a good profit and satisfy your customers or you are the wrong person or in the wrong business. Satisfying your customers' demand for your product while providing employment for people who want to work for you is enough. The rest is culture war stuff.
For what it's worth which may be nothing
The Awful Truth: Paul Pelosi Was Drunk Again, And In a Dispute With a Male Prostitute Early Friday Morning.
https://web.archive.org/web/20221029193056/https://www.smobserved.com/story/2022/10/29/news/the-awful-truth-paul-pelosi-was-drunk-again-and-in-a-dispute-with-a-male-prostitute-early-friday-morning/7191.html
This story I believe, the "official' story makes no sense. Of course they will try to blame it on right wing conspiracy.
And by the way, when Pelosi was in that drunk driving accident, he had a young man with him, and that too was covered up by the police and the press.
In light of that, this theory actually makes the most sense. Not an attack on Nancy Pelosi, not MAGA-related, not terrorism, just two drunk idiots late at night, one of whom was invited in for sex by the owner of the residence.
Oh, it's worse than that. They actually set up this patsy months ago:
"The domain frenlyfrens.com was registered Aug. 8 under DePape’s name and to an address in Richmond, Calif., where a neighbor told a Post reporter he lived. The web address uses the phonetic spelling of “friend,” which has become a slang term adopted by many in the far right — a term that is sometimes written as an acronym for Far Right Ethno-Nationalist."
Who knows what sordid shit they must have pulled to get him over to Pelosi's house on Friday!
"The lockdowns, I believe history will show, were probably the stupidest thing that the government will have done in the 21st century unless they get into a nuclear war. It was idiotic."
Amen, and it was done for one reason, not to protect anyone's health, but to defeat Donald Trump in the Presidential election.
Remember that when you vote.
Misguided as lockdowns were, they were done to protect public health.
"My concern is that I feel like socialists are taking over. They're marching through the institutions. They're taking everything over and taking over education. It looks like they've taken over a lot of the corporations. It looks like they've taken over the military. And it's just continuing. I'm so deeply concerned about it. I believe in liberty and capitalism. Those are my twin values."
Amen again, and never forget (T)Reason.com supported this take over in the 2020 election and the year leading up to it. They blamed everything on the one President/politician that was actually fighting against the socialist takeover, calling him an authoritarian dictator.
Actually I am surprised (T)Reason.com had the guts to print this interview considering their socialist views.
Are you referring to President Trump. The only thing he was fighting for was his own narrow interests.
My concern is that he doesn’t seem to use a coherent definition of “socialist”.
Socialist corporations?
Of course, when nearly the entire population of a country misunderstands the word "liberal", and cannot tell which color is associated with the left, coherent definitions are probably considered optional.
Although I have great respect for John Mackey, respectfully disagree with his view of history.
Today the inequity between the richest Americans and the working class is about what is was leading up to the Great Depression. Billionaire Warren Buffet once warned that the tax system was so “regressive” that he paid a lower tax rate than his secretary.
This is the opposite of a “socialism” problem, with a heavy “progressive” system that takes money from the richest Americans.
Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower had a top tax rate exceeding 70% rate. Republican Richard Nixon supported a “Universal Healthcare” system more LIBERAL than either Obama or Biden. Nixon wanted everyone covered with healthcare. Ronald Reagan signed 11 tax increases into law.
Bill Clinton was the last president to leave office with a balanced budget. George W. Bush was a fiscal liberal. Even if you deduct wartime spending, it was outrageous how much Bush and the then GOP-controllled Congress spent. Bush nearly created a 2nd Great Depression through his spending policies while decreasing tax revenue. Obama brought the Bush credit card bill just below what he inherited.
If we are going to use weaponized labels like “socialism”, it should also be noted that voters of both parties support some socialized programs. Most voters support public school education for their children and “socialized” police protection, fire/EMS services, Social Security (partly subsidized after 5 years).
I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction
On the given website.........>>> Topcitypay
Seriously? Harmless? Read Das Capital, any Marx writings, Lenin, or Stalin. Almost all of what they advocate has happened in the US or is being advocated for by the left.
Shemale Rouen is the most popular web platform for finding casual contacts with hot girls in France
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot (vdr-80) of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
…
Just open the link————————————–>>> http://Www.TopCityPay.Com
The practice of Marxism should be criminalized. Ideally as a constitutional amendment. Socialists should be destroyed. As the socialist movement has no right to exist.
They are the enemy. Destroy them before they do the same to us.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> ???.????????.???