Gavin Newsom Does His Best Jimmy Carter Impression
California's governor is following Carter's disastrous energy policies at a time when the state's residents are suffering from already high prices.

It was arguably the most politically disastrous speech from a president in the nation's history. Against a backdrop of quarter-mile-long lines at gas stations, soaring inflation, and nationwide strikes by independent truckers disgruntled by fuel prices and energy regulations, President Jimmy Carter gave what historians call his "national malaise" address.
Carter didn't actually use that term, but he prattled about Americans' "crisis of confidence" and detailed policies that helped lay the groundwork for Ronald Reagan's 1980 landslide presidential victory. The main issue centered on the grueling national energy crisis.
"I'm asking Congress to mandate, to require as a matter of law, that our nation's utility companies cut their massive use of oil by 50 percent within the next decade," he said. He demanded that Congress impose a "windfall profits tax"—a punishing tax on "excess" oil-company profits. He planned to create a new energy bureaucracy and shift the nation toward solar power.
If you're a Californian, this should sound familiar given that Gov. Gavin Newsom—who hopes to become president—is following Carter's energy playbook. Newsom was 12 when Carter gave his speech and many of the state's lawmakers weren't born yet, so perhaps they can be forgiven for not remembering that mess. But they can read about it and realize this is no model to follow.
Newsom recently announced a special session in December to deal with soaring gasoline prices. The average national price is $3.80 per gallon and $3.25 in Texas. In California, the average is $5.80 a gallon and above $8 in some areas. "Gas prices are up while oil companies rake in RECORD profits," Newsom tweeted. "We cannot continue to allow greedy oil companies to rip us off at the pump."
The legislative confab will no doubt include chest-thumping by lawmakers who refuse to realize the real cause of California's sky-high gas prices, which is our public policy. Lawmakers had proposed with Newsom's support the idea of reviving that Carter-era windfall profits tax. Only in California would lawmakers propose a new tax to bring down the price of a commodity.
Although shelved, the idea is one of the worst concepts imaginable. It lets government determine the proper level of profits that a company may earn, and then hammers them with a tax designed to punish them if they earn too much. It's an abuse of power, and it won't reduce gas prices. Quite the contrary, as it will discourage investment in oil exploration and reduce the supply of gasoline. It's essentially a price cap, and will only lead to shortages and gas lines.
"A Congressional Research Service paper found that the tax reduced domestic oil production by between 1.2 and 8 percent, and increased reliance on foreign oil by between 3 percent and 13 percent between 1980 and 1988 (when the tax was eventually repealed)," according to a Tax Foundation analysis. This is a recipe for compounding rather than solving the problem.
Lefty economists have for years complained about California's "mystery gas surcharge"—i.e., the difference between the price people in other states pay and the amount we pay here. It's not really a mystery. California has the second-highest gas taxes in the nation. Our state regulations mandate a special environmentally friendly gasoline formulation that limits our access to petroleum refined in other states and is costlier to produce.
A prominent economist says the state pays higher gas prices beyond what the state's higher taxes and regulations explain. "I'm sure they're charging more because they can. The question is, are there actual costs behind it that are justifying it?" UC Berkeley's Severin Borenstein told KGO News in San Francisco. Companies charge prices that reflect supply and demand and not what academics and bureaucrats determine to be justified. Shocking.
But why are refiners so much greedier in California than they are everywhere else? "The big problem is we have policies in place, especially in California, that make it difficult to expand supply," an economist for the Institute for Energy Research told Fox Business News. Go figure, but you get more of what you reward and less of what you punish.
Basically, Newsom and the Democratic Legislature have been waging a jeremiad against gasoline production. In 2020, Newsom signed an executive order mandating that the California Air Resources Board ban sales of new internal-combustion-engine vehicles by 2035. His administration is proud of myriad new rules that vastly limit oil and gas drilling. Like Carter, Newsom is obsessed with switching to alternative fuels.
Currently, California is struggling to keep the lights on. Truckers have protested at the Port of Oakland, thanks to a Newsom-signed law (Assembly Bill 5) that limits the owner-operator trucking model. We're experiencing a statewide malaise that's eerily reminiscent of the Carter years. All we need now are the ubiquitous 1970s bumper stickers updated to reflect the man in charge: "Newsom, Kiss My Gas."
This column was first published by The Orange County Register.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Yesterday, a mid-priced station near me on the west side of L.A. was priced at $5.79 a gallon for low octane.
Well, I paid $3.16 per gallon in Iowa.
And just across the river in Illinois (aka the California of the Midwest), it's $3.89 in Rock Island. It gets worse going east to Chicago at $4.39 a gallon (Costco) and up to $5.29 a gallon (BP, 1647 N. LaSalle Dr). I live in the gas price war zone of Illinois, but, we're still paying $3.69 a gallon (Sam's Club).
As an occasional Illinois visitor, I refuse to support the purchasing of fuel there. Unfortunately, I have to wait in line behind the Illinois drivers who also refuse to support that state.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot (vdr-09) of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
…
Just open the link————————————–>>> http://Www.TopCityPay.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> ???.????????.???
When we went on our annual Wisconsin fishing trip in July, gas was $4.10 per gallon in Missouri, $4.90 per gallon in Illinois, and as soon as we crossed into Wisconsin it was $3.89 again. And the exit at Beloit was the most expensive we saw in Wisconsin.
Chicago, like California, has it's own special mandated blend so you can't get just any ol' gasoline and truck it in. Always way more expensive than Wisconsin.
Go figure. I suppose nobody well ever understand this mystery that is high prices with limited supply.
I saw $2.94 here in Florida.
I fully support Newsome’s effort to destroy California’s economy to delegitimize left wing economic theory.
If history is anything to go by, catastrophic failures do nothing to delegitimize left-wing economic theory. It's a religion.
Left wing failures had quite an impact among the people who lived through them. The Soviet Union no longer exists because their system so obviously underperformed the west the people wouldn’t put up with it.
Our problem is that since leftists control our institutions they are able to convince the public these failures were due to unique characteristics rather than inherent to leftist economics. But that belief would be impossible to maintain of California.
Remember that most people are not leftist ideologies, that is the political class. Voters will jump ship as soon as they understand the economic impact of leftist economics. The sooner that happens the better. Our worst outcome is for everyone to move together. It’s the differentiation which allows people to learn despite academia and media’s best efforts to hide reality.
Soviet citizens had too little experience with the west for any comparisons to matter. What mattered was the system was just plain bad all on its own. The people weren't dumb. They knew the elite got special stores. They knew private garden plots provided more food than collective farms. They knew how long it took to get a car. They knew the political system provided no fixes. They knew about the gulags.
True, but the people I met on my travels behind the Iron Curtain were well aware of American living standards and culture. Vaclav Havel was a Velvet Underground fan, and some musicians serenaded me with Home on the Range in front of Russian apparatchiks when they found out I was American.
Our problem is that since leftists control our institutions they are able to convince the public these failures were due to unique characteristics rather than inherent to leftist economics
It's deeper than that. It's that the true believers still believe. That's why they keep proselytizing.
You'd think the gas lines during Carter's administration deserve a mention. Related to this, is the expected zero supply of diesel on 11/21, after the midterms and the week of Thanksgiving. If you think this won't affect your gasoline supply, note that all the tanker trucks that deliver your gasoline to your gas station, use diesel. Same thing with airlines, as most all the equipment to support those flights (other than the plane) use diesel. As do many generators around the USA, needed to keep people alive in hospitals and nursing homes, when the electricity goes out.
The ironic thing about Carter, is he was a Democrat who deregulated beer production, trucking, railroads and airlines which helped the country immensely. Biden and the RINOs are doing the opposite, regulating and getting control of commerce to start taking a cut of that business, in campaign funds to pick winners and losers in the business.
Good thing Biden already emptied the SPR. Who knows what would happen if we hadn't already spent our savings!
Oh, wait. :-/
You mean the dnc & biden aren't going to magic some electric trucks to haul those tanks? Electric trucks w/ less hauling range, and batteries that will fail in the winter? Batteries that are a fire hazard around fuel? EVs are for people who need the equivalent of a golf cart, full stop. This winter is likely to be miserable, and if there's a repeat of the carter-years fuel lines, more so.
"...The ironic thing about Carter, is he was a Democrat who deregulated beer production, trucking, railroads and airlines which helped the country immensely..."'
That's spelled "somewhat".
This is all you need to know about Newsome and democrat dishonesty.
"Newsom recently announced a special session in December to deal with soaring gasoline prices. The average national price is $3.80 per gallon and $3.25 in Texas. In California, the average is $5.80 a gallon and above $8 in some areas. "Gas prices are up while oil companies rake in RECORD profits," Newsom tweeted. "We cannot continue to allow greedy oil companies to rip us off at the pump."
IMHO, one example of dishonesty doesn't tell one "all you need to know about Newsome and democrat dishonesty". But it does make one wonder, if Newsome is lying about this, what else is he lying about?
Our founders pointed out that we need honest people in the government. We're collectively voting for a lot of skilled liars, which is our collective fault. But then, being a libertarian, I'm against doing anything collectively, that individuals can do for themselves. I don't see a way around democracy to elect political leaders, but I do see many ways we can get government out of situations in which they shouldn't be involved. Such as commerce other than defending free markets (from who else, but government). That's why we need honest people in government.
Shut down the pumps. Problem solved.
The difference in the price of fuel between CA and AZ or NM or NV or wherever is due entirely to choices that CA has made regarding the way they run their state. Things have to be higher priced there no matter what simply because of the general business environment, to start with, but the two major things driving this particular problem, either one of which is bad enough but in combo they're killer: A.) The One State Only gasoline formulation, and B.) The ban on new refineries being built.
If they didn't allow refineries, but used the same gasoline as AZ and NV and NM and TX and OK, they'd have to pay higher transportation costs, but at least the fuel would exist. If they just had the stupid fuel formulation, but would allow refineries to be built, they'd probably have enough refinery capacity to keep up with their needs.
But in combo, they've set themselves up for there simply to not be enough fuel for the state, which means what's there is going to be stupidly expensive. They are the architects of their own misery.
Gas is $3.27 here in south Florida
The greedy oil companies aren't as greedy in Florida.
I remember 80-cent gas in a Reason cartoon... Gas was 21 cents near the Mexican border back when Lyndon Johnson was killing kids--before Nixon got the job.
He bitches about record profits of 30 cents a gallon, made by the people actually producing and delivering the commodity, while the state takes in 54 cents a gallon by doing nothing at all, which I'm sure he sees no issue with whatsoever.
That everything you think you own, you don't really own because the government owns it, is to be the presumptuous position of statist politicians in the USA these days. It's socialism in crapitalist clothing.
Technocracy is just communism with spats. - John C Stevens, 1933
Newsom's visage is starting to eerily resemble "The Man Who Laughs."
Sacred values, moral orthodoxy, rejection of dissent (and objective truth), proscribed suffering--how is Progressive Liberalism NOT a religion?
Christ, what an asshole.
Gasshole?
Us in CA deserve all the bad things that happen to us. Don't feel sorry for our own stupidity. We (Not me, but I'm guilty by association) put him and the d bags that run this state in power. I'm surrounded by complete idiots. Although EDCO isn't as bad as the rest of the state I still have to suffer with his policies. Some goes for NY, NJ, and the other states who vote for those that want to take our money and waste it on the slackere.
I didnt vote for these assholes. My fellow californians are a bunch of stalinists and they are hell bent on creating this dystopia.
Yeah, at least we in Illinois know we're being held hostage by one city and its political machine.
I have to agree. When was the last time my voted carried weight here in California? Fuck it, I can’t even recall.
my problem with Governor Joker is all his voters keep coming to Texas
Yeah, we need to think again about building some walls. Progressive shitholes should be quarantined, for, um, just 2 weeks.
“I’m asking Congress to mandate, to require as a matter of law, that our nation’s utility companies cut their massive use of oil by 50 percent within the next decade,”
If not for Three Mile Island energizing the No Nukes crowd, that could have been accomplished without any mandates.
The irony, is if you look at the donation history, that the oil companies were the biggest donors to the anti-nuke campaigns.
That's not irony. that's business. Oil companies have also been at the forefront of attacks on 'renewal energy' like solar, wind etc. What's weird is that oil companies also choose to question the links between smoking and cancer through funding 'think tanks' like the Heartland Institute. As cancer means big bucks, I can understand big pharma having an interest in promoting incidence of cancer, and they also fund Heartland, but oil companies?
It's irony because the same fuckgeads, like you, who now demonize oil, took their money and killed the best alternative to it. But you're to stupid to get that.
I've always demonized oil and I've never taken money from them. You might be thinking of that environmentalist group in Texas who were trying to protect an endangered species of bird from extinction. The oil company donated the nesting grounds to the group on the condition that they continue to pump oil in the area. They did, the environmentalists got filthy rich, and the birds went extinct. True story, but it doesn't involve me or the nuclear industry.
You demonize oil and nuclear, while offering solutions that aren't feasible. So yes I meant you.
mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
"Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."
Yep, he posted that.
I don't demonize them. I don't believe in demons, and never have. I am critical. I am also critical or wind, solar, batteries, and all the other things you hate. I am more amenable to conservation, using materials and energy efficiently, vegetarianism, scientific research into controlled fusion and harnessed photosynthesis, and worst of all, planetary cooperation. I am not critical of these things, which I take it you hate as a matter of course, and I don't demonize them either.
"while offering solutions that aren’t feasible."
I don't see you offering any feasible solutions either. I guess that means we're both fucked. Any solutions, feasible or not, are going to come from places like China or India.
Fuck you with a rusty running chainsaw, asshole:
mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
“Spouting nonsense is an end in itself.”
Yep, he posted that.
Let’s be a bit more specific as regards replying to the lying pile of lefty shit, trueman: “I don’t demonize them. I don’t believe in demons, and never have.”
The lying pile of lefty shit assumes this bit of pedantry will convince assholes such as him that there was an argument; stuff it up your ass.
“I am critical. I am also critical or wind, solar, batteries, and all the other things you hate”.
Not by anything you’ve posted here, shitpile. Care to offer a cite? No surprise, there is none.
“I am more amenable to conservation, using materials and energy efficiently, vegetarianism, scientific research into controlled fusion and harnessed photosynthesis, and worst of all, planetary cooperation. I am not critical of these things, which I take it you hate as a matter of course, and I don’t demonize them either.”
Shitbag admits, for the first time, to accept fusion, and then wanders off into unicorn fart territory. Fuck off and die, asshole. Make your family proud, and your dog happy.
Worldwide Coal Usage Skyrockets Ahead Of Major UN Climate Conference
Yes, China and India (and Europe is revving up) are now passing the pre-treaties levels of coal usage !! So WHY are we acting like we are going to make a speck of difference. Go hungry, freeze to death -- and your contribution does nothing for the climate. nothing
The stuck PORV valve at TMI killed exactly zero people and injured only twice again as many. But as Ukraine is learning, power generation capacity is the main target of totalitarian socialist ideologies.
"Gas prices are up while oil companies rake in RECORD profits," Newsom tweeted. "We cannot continue to allow greedy oil companies to rip us off at the pump."
How dare my incompetence enrich someone other than myself!
Funny they weren't greedy two years ago when they were happy to settle for lower prices.
Worldwide Coal Usage Skyrockets Ahead Of Major UN Climate Conference
""I'm asking Congress to mandate, to require as a matter of law, that our nation's utility companies cut their massive use of oil by 50 percent within the next decade," he said. He demanded that Congress impose a "windfall profits tax"—a punishing tax on "excess" oil-company profits. He planned to create a new energy bureaucracy and shift the nation toward solar power."
I don't think any of this came to pass and within weeks Carter reversed himself, and essentially annexed the Persian Gulf, cementing America's dependency on fossil fuels that still exists today.
Failure.
No, not failure. They call it The Carter Doctrine, the threat that the United States would use military force, if necessary, to defend its national interests in the Persian Gulf. It was announced at the state of the union address in 1980, a few months after the malaise speech. No president since Carter has renounced the doctrine, and a few have made good on the threat, including Biden, Trump, Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush again, and Reagan.
There was no way we could have an economy anywhere near this size without reliance on petroleum.
If you ever find yourself a girlfriend, Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force, she'll tell you size isn't everything.
mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|# “Spouting nonsense is an end in itself.”
Yep, he posted that.
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.
mtrueman, you seem to never say anything mature or intelligent.
Ted is absolutely right, does that bother you
So we have a nuclear engineer to blame for our disastrous Middle East interventions since 1980.
Funny, since then our dependence on ME oil has been eliminated (we import from Canada and previously Venezuela) and in 2019 became a net exporter.
Europe and Japan are importers from ME. So the US is protecting their supply, not ours.
" So the US is protecting their supply, not ours."
Their supply is our supply. "National interests" are funny that way.
I forget. When did Europe and Japan become part of our Nation?
They are allies, but our national interests do not always align with theirs.
"but our national interests do not always align with theirs."
Exactly why running a global empire sometimes runs into difficulties. What are America's national interests in the Persian Gulf that make it worth it worth killing and being killed over? No president since Carter has repudiated the Carter Doctrine. Carter did have a vision of an America weaned away from dependency on fossil fuels. Perhaps he let his political ambitions for re-election take precedence, though I'm not sure why he reversed himself.
mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
“Spouting nonsense is an end in itself.”
Stupid and smug about is a poor way to live, but the jackass trueman will have it no other way.
The one time I voted God's Own Prohibitionists was after hearing Jimmeh's windfall profits sermon. It was expiation. That second time the LP competed in an election The Kleptocracy kept its existence a secret. But Gavin just now proved our East German Dems are as irredeemably hateful of freedom as the Grabbers of Pussy. Their only advantage is they take longer (cruelty? incompetence?) to kill the economy on the altar of altruist prohibitionism.
Is there a point within that babbling word salad?
No.
mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
“Spouting nonsense is an end in itself.”
And Greenhut has been carrying water for Gov. Hair Gel for how long now?
If only Newsom had Carter's competence!
And wasn’t way more wimpy than Jimmy…
Personally I think he should shutdown all oil use tomorrow!!
More gas for the rest of us. Sort of feel the same about electric cars.
Newsom is way worse than Carter. Carter at least meant well.
Newsom means to acquire more power.
Equating President Carter to Newsome is is disgusting. It's a thing that republican failures do. Jimmy Carter was trusted by Admiral Rickover to literally write the book on how to run our first nuclear reactors. He was trusted to lead the American contingent that helped the Canadians stop their Salt River meltdown. Those two things are why, even though he was rated to command submarines; he was given tasks that were more far-reaching that one boat. He took the unpopular stance of equality for blacks in his small Georgia town and church. He led by example in everything from wearing that hurt-your-feelings sweater to personally walking through the Three Mile Island site and soaking up the Rads along with the workers who were shutting down that disaster. He was and is anti-war as fuck, which is why the Military Industrial Complex and it's stooges still badmouth him. He was the first to face problems that presidents are still ineffectually dealing with and he never passed the buck. Second to Calvin Coolidge (and in some ways, Trump), he was the most Libertarian president we have had, and definitely the most respectable. You couldn't make a Carter out of 47 Newsomes. Cut the shit sonny.
A lot to admire about Carter, but that quote is real. He seriously misunderstood the public.
He was a nuclear engineer and deserved a hearing on those issues.
As far as doing things for our own good, C S Lewis provided this:
“ Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
"...Jimmy Carter was trusted by Admiral Rickover to literally write the book on how to run our first nuclear reactors..."
He shouldn't have quit his day job; he sucked as POTUS.
?? ?????? ???? $??? ? ????? ??????? ???? ????. ? ???? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ???? ????? ???? ??? ???? ?????? ?? ? ??????? ?? ???? ???? ??. ????, ?? ??? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??????? ??????? ?? ????. ???? ?? ???? ? ??.
??? ???? ????.????…….>>> Topcitypay
Does the moron even read the news:
Worldwide Coal Usage Skyrockets Ahead Of Major UN Climate Conference
You want CA to suffer and contribute but the WORLD is accelerating coal usage drastically.
?? ?????? ???? $??? ? ????? ??????? ???? ????. ? ???? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ???? ????? ???? ??? ???? ?????? ?? ? ??????? ?? ???? ???? ??. ????, ?? ??? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??????? ??????? ?? ????. ???? ?? ???? ? ??.
??? ???? ????.????…….>>> Topcitypay