Los Angeles City Council Scandal Highlights Ugly Influence of Big Labor
Having a city council secretly dominated by people with racist views is troubling, but having an entire political system controlled by one special interest group is also scandalous.

By now, most of us have read about the recorded conversation of Los Angeles County council insiders making mean-spirited and bigoted comments about Blacks, whites, gays, Jews, Armenians, and indigenous peoples as they complained about the new redistricting maps that a city commission had recently proposed. It's appalling—and we're just beginning to see the fallout.
Now-resigned Council President Nury Martinez and her colleagues (Council members Gil Cedillo and Kevin de León and former labor leader Ron Herrera) seemed hostile to everyone who wasn't in their little clique, viewing them as a threat to their political power. But what constitutes membership in that group?
That's where this story becomes more fascinating and sinister. Los Angeles is an overwhelmingly Latino city (and there's obviously no single Latino point of view, as Martinez's mocking of Oaxacans made clear), so the idea that this group broadly represents Latino interests is preposterous. In reality, these officials represent one faction, highlighted by the location of the clandestine meeting.
It took place in an office at the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor—"an umbrella group for 300 labor unions and 800,000 workers that wields tremendous and sometimes controversial sway in the city," as The Los Angeles Times explained. We got a sneak peek, as top lawmakers were sitting with union brass talking about carving up districts to enhance their power and dilute the power of other ethnic and political blocks.
I've been a critic of It's almost hard to believe, but California was once known as the state with premier public services. Under the leadership of Democratic Gov. Pat Brown, California built top universities (with free tuition for residents), expansive freeways, fabulous schools, and advanced water infrastructure.
Now, these investments are in shambles, with the state having among the nation's worst schools, most congested freeways, persistent water shortages, the highest tax rates, the worst business climate, the largest bureaucracies, the highest pension debt, and most meddlesome regulations. One can peruse any number of national rankings and find California reliably at the bottom of them.
How did we get here? There are many reasons, but Brown's son, Jerry Brown, during his first stint as governor in the 1970s signed laws giving collective-bargaining power to state employees and employees at public schools, colleges and universities. Gov. Ronald Reagan signed a law giving city and county employees the right to collectively bargain. Over the years, lawmakers kept bolstering these unions' power.
"Democratic politicians routinely visit the offices of 'the Fed' on James M. Woods Boulevard to seek favors from labor unions and arrange campaign help," the Times added, referring to the now-infamous Los Angeles meeting. That's an understatement. The federation of labor, which represents private and public union members, was not just one interest group—it was in cahoots with the leadership.
In the state Capitol, the unions—and especially public-sector unions such as the California Teachers' Association, various law-enforcement, and firefighting unions and the SEIU—aren't just among the normal group of lobbying interests. They control the building and elect lawmakers who come from their ranks. And you wonder why public services or government contracting never are reformed?
"There is no special interest in California that wields more influence over state and local politics than public sector unions," noted the California Policy Center's Edward Ring. "From the office of the governor to a school board managing a district with only a few hundred students, public sector unions are omnipresent.…(T)o defy their agenda is certain political suicide." He says they spend hundreds of millions of dollars per two-year election cycle.
In the Orange County race for supervisor, the deputies' union is spending around $87,000 a week on cable ads depicting the even-tempered and moderate-to-conservative Republican Pat Bates as an "extremist." The Orange County Employees' Association, which represents county government workers, recently dropped $50,000 on a mailer touting Bates' progressive Democratic opponent, Katrina Foley. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
In Riverside County, unions are targeting Libertarian Supervisor Jeff Hewitt. Hewitt previously angered firefighters with his efforts to create a city-run fire department in Calimesa. He also opposed the board's decision to boost deputy pay. Campaign spending is part of the system—but at the local level candidates who don't do union bidding struggle against daunting odds.
Opposing local cops and firefighter spending priorities is, as Ring said, political suicide, which is why most politicians—including Republicans—simply roll over. Having a city council secretly dominated by people with such awful views is troubling, but having an entire political system controlled by one special interest group is also scandalous.
This column was first published in The Orange County Register.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That's where this story becomes more fascinating and sinister. Los Angeles is an overwhelmingly Latino city (and there's obviously no single Latino point of view, as Martinez's mocking of Oaxacans made clear)
Chance of Greenhut reconsidering the notion that nominal diversity represents or breeds ideological diversity: 0.00%
Chance of Greenhut reconsidering the notion that nominal diversity produces *any* beneficial outcomes: [divide by zero error]
That's the old Diversity motte and bailey. The theoretical motte was a diversity of backgrounds, which arguably leads to better outcomes by taking from a broader pool of past experience, while the bailey was racial quota checkboxes acting as the fig leaf for ideological and cultural conformity amongst the bureaucratic class. That hasn't been the argument in years.
The new motte is that racial diversity checkboxes are a positive outcome in and of themselves due to a twisted, racist equity ideology that makes absolutely no sense to anyone oustide of that bureaucratic class bubble.
Different backgrounds doesn't really lead to much better outcomes either, at least not by default.
For example, if I drop a conservative Muslim male into a management role they will have a different perspective; specifically that women are no longer allowed to work there. Good job?
Same goes for recent graduates who believe a slew of things that simply aren't true. They don't add anything other than discord, and since they believe profit is evil they might even drag you out of business then wonder why they don't have a job.
My own generation were by and large fucking idiots, but Gen Z is making them look like rocket scientists by comparison. Each generation seems to double down on the excesses of the last.
Life has gotten too easy.
Stuff appears by magic. We just need to use cleaner enviro-magic.
I chalk it up to the ephemeral economy beneficiaries forgetting that their economy is only possible because of the real economy.
They take it as a given that the real economy will exist, even as they literally eviscerate it by intention.
Good luck working from home doing, for example, AP data entry when there is no electricity. These people produce nothing in particular, and are fairly well paid for their nothing, but that nothing goes away instantly with even seemingly minor 'tweaks' to the economy. They know how to produce nothing without that economic layer that evaporates first, and will probably be the most fucked in a downturn as well since they have saved nothing.
AP (data entry)? Pardon me for not knowing ...
Different backgrounds doesn’t really lead to much better outcomes either, at least not by default.
It doesn't guarantee better outcomes, but the argument was that the more different perspectives are involved in solving a problem, the greater the chance that, for example, someone will have a solution to a similar problem from a different context to share.
But my main point was more that nobody's even making that argument anymore. The bureaucrat class has made it clear that it believes that the "better outcomes" from Diversity is the Diversity itself and is no longer bothering to try and convince you.
Not just that but their idea of diversity is explicitly leftist black and brown bodies plus women so true diversity is only achieved once you've driven out all the white men and are 100% leftist of black, brown or woman.
"Different backgrounds doesn’t really lead to much better outcomes either, at least not by default."
Ya if given the choice between a team of gender diverse (and gender fluid/dysphoric), white, black, hispanic, and asians to solve a problem vs a team of 100% cis gendered male asians...
"bigoted comments about Blacks, whites, gays, Jews, Armenians, and indigenous peoples"
Hey, at least they have an inclusive list for their bigotry
There's some equality in the 'anyone can get it' approach
Where's the Asian hate?
Asians are white.
"I've been a critic of It's almost hard to believe, but California was once known as the state with premier public services. Under the leadership of Democratic Gov."
How does one screw up the editing of an article that was already edited and published in another newspaper 5 days ago?
Watching too much Joe Biden. He is adopting Bidens behaviors.
I wonder what it's like to be such a BASIC Trump republican on a libertarian comment section? I remember coming here way back when Reason just went digital and being in awe of some of the brilliance I found in the comments. Now I click and it's just partisan hacks of both parties talking nonsense without any real insight or new ideas. That's just what happened to the internet in general, but damn why did you shills have to invade this space?
When the staff writing abandons libertarianism in favor of Trump-hatred, it corrupts the standard of conversation going forward. The conversation isn't building to particularly advanced libertarian topics because so many of the commenters are left dissecting the idiocy the writers are putting out. That perspective probably holds over to cases where TDS is a less meaningful explanation than simply bad writing.
If you want a better caliber of comments, demand a better caliber of staff writing.
Amen! They need to get out of DC.
Of course I am still the same brilliant, incisive independent thinker as always, but yeah.
You missed all the comments above to single out and make an anti-trump all-caps, and ignorant comment? You clearly did not read the comments 'way back when Reason just went digital,' or you would know that the commentariat has some of the same regulars. And has always been like this. Fuck off back to to wherever you think the true libertarians are.
"...and get off my lawn!"
How does one screw up the editing of an article that was already edited and published in another newspaper 5 days ago?
Diversity.
So, it's good for us?
He fucked up the hyperlinking, which was probably not in the OG article.
having an entire political system controlled by one special interest group is also scandalous
What scandal? If it were scandalous, it would be all over the news and people would be outraged enough to do something about it. Instead, nobody cares and nothing is going to be done about it. The citizens of LA tried to get rid of George Gascon, got some 717,000 signatures on a petition - way more than necessary - and the officials just threw out the petition. There were no riots, no protests, no officials dangling from lampposts, no nothing. It's crystal clear LA officials don't represent the voters, they don't give a shit about anybody but themselves and everybody else is just cattle to be milked for all they're worth.
You are right on all except one point. You said LA officials exist in order to milk everyone for all they're worth, and nothing will be done.
This is true of every official.
What fascinates me about this scandal is people being mainly upset over the racial shit-talking, when the full on open corruption in LA between the city council and labor leaders is so blatant and in your face.
And one of the fuckers isn’t even resigning!
https://ktla.com/news/local-news/kevin-de-leon-says-he-will-not-resign-from-l-a-city-council-amid-controversy/amp/
To most Democrats, hell, even a shit load of Republicans, unions are sacred. Nothing a union does is wrong. This is a religious belief among many. Seriously, it's religious. So they see nothing wrong with unions controlling a city council. The only concern is who is representing the union.
It's like politics, no one cares about government power they only care about who is running the government. No need to drain the swamp, one only campaigns on draining the swamp to get the non-union vote. Because the union and union mentality is the swamp. The swamp isn't a pit of muck and weeds and dead frogs, it's a comfy featherbed.
Giving the unions that much power erodes democracy.
But you won't hear the people saying democracy is at risk say that.
You won't find a whole lot of pro-Union Republicans outside perhaps the Senate. At least not these days.
Maybe I'm wrong, but none of the Republicans that have represented a district I live in have anything nice to say about them.
As a conservative, I'd say I do not care if somebody joins a private employee union. Usually a stupid idea, but people are free to have them.
It's the public employee unions that need to go DIAF.
You say that like politicians couldn't make decisions that violate their oaths of office and cause the deaths of 10s of thousands of their own citizens and be forced to step down because they were handsy Italians.
Why Democrats love them some unions.
Californians in 1879 were thrilled to have Big Labor goons back their cries to use Chinese and Japanese exclusion laws to exclude the more frugal and efficient immigrants seeking visas. What changed?
The sad part is, it’s not just California that’s in the thrall of public sector labor unions.
NJ has entered the chat
Oh, and despite the cut-and-paste editing fail, this was a pretty good article from Reason.
It's amazing that Greenhut actually stuck his pencil-neck out and wrote something substantial. His usual takes are bromide that aren't critical of anything left-wing, and now he's poking at the LA junta!
Was thinking same. He fucked up the racist angle (hint, greenhut, everyfuckbody, every fucking racial has racists), but he does suck, being a 'the bulwark' reading asshat. The rest though, I was amazed, facts. No telling the reader that he is the umpire of what is just and fair. No horseshit proclamations that a pre-schooler would suss out as obvious untruths. This was reporting.
IDK. Not bad, but he managed to plate some food on the absolute shortest of otherwise tall orders. It’s not like he’s serving up even a modest dish of, “You know, maybe Rand Paul is right about COVID.” in 2019-2020 or anything. But, admittedly, ‘baby steps’.
"Under the leadership of Democratic Gov. Pat Brown, California built top universities (with free tuition for residents), expansive freeways, fabulous schools, and advanced water infrastructure.
"Now, these investments are in shambles, with the state having among the nation's worst schools, most congested freeways, persistent water shortages, the highest tax rates, the worst business climate, the largest bureaucracies, the highest pension debt, and most meddlesome regulations. One can peruse any number of national rankings and find California reliably at the bottom of them."
I keep hoping that the solution to progressive policy is to let local activists run things into level 10 shit, and hope that people will finally wake up. But the people keep letting me down.
This is just another example of the final death throes of the urban dinosaurs. High-population-density cities became ungovernable (by libertarian standards) shortly after they began forming. A host of memes including "Tamany Hall" and "You can't fight city hall" testify to the corrupt and autocratic history of big cities in America and to what happens when crusaders try to root out and eliminate corruption or punish corrupt officials. The original purpose of humans being packed into small areas like sardines was long ago superseded by modern communications, production and transportation technology and the city infrastructures having become too expensive and difficult to maintain have deteriorated beyond anyone's ability to restore. What we are seeing now is the last of the denizens fighting each other over the dregs of the cities.
But they’re leading the bans and mandates on Climate change! At least that’s what Barrons reported.
This incident has shone a light on some pretty awful things--I mean, really, who calls an African-American toddler a "monkey?"
But there are some troubling things below the surface--anti-black violence is a thing in LA. Randal Archibold did stories on this years ago, and where was the outrage? What about membership in MEChA? That group isn't know for racial tolerance/togetherness?
"I mean, really, who calls an African-American toddler a “monkey?”"
Id assume, a democrat
The only way this shitshow goes away is state bankruptcies. The feds prop up bankrupt states, bankrupt states prop up bankrupt cities (see Illinois/Chicago). End the public/private partnerships- fascism. There’s a public/private partnership putting in ISP lines in my area. The completion of this small project might happen in a decade or so, or never. But the workers can play on their phones and roll in to start hanging out at around 11:00am.
Greenhut is right, but he’s missing the forest for the trees. Imagine all criminal families gathering together to discuss agenda (like the ones in the Godfather series). The point isn’t that one of them is corrupt, or even that some of them used racist language.
The discussion was mostly about redistricting and taking over mark Ridley Thomas’ seat. The unions sent a representative to the meeting, in which progressive leaders schemed consolidation of power along racial lines. Nothing they said took US by surprise. The left is obsessed with identity politics. Voters are not people, but useful demographics. Your value and concern is tied to your identity.
The racist language they derives from their lack of humanity. Remember that these are people who push for “equity based relief” in natural disasters. They want empowerment of THEIR group, or some other protected groups. If Nuri Martinez never used racist language on Bonin’s kid, her sentiments were still despicable.
Believe it or not, workers do reject unionization, and some states whittled down on collective bargaining. How did unions become powerful in CA? You simply can’t ignore drastic shift in demographics. CA has lots of poor immigrant who make other people rich, and they were prime demo for class warfare democrats. Immigrants don’t only vote democrat (at 70% rate) but they also help transition the party of Bill Clinton to the more radical socialists that they are today.
Lame attempt at deflection by Greenhut. Can't both sides this one because Democrats so pervasively dominate the political scene. So he will try to pretend that the problem is one from a constituency, not the party itself.
LOL
Most of those unions are public sector unions or unions for private companies paid for by government. That doesn’t make them “big labor”, it simply makes them a corrupt political organizations, a scheme for vote buying by one party.
"By now, most of us have read about the recorded conversation of Los Angeles County council insiders making mean-spirited and bigoted comments about Blacks, whites, gays, Jews, Armenians, and indigenous peoples as they complained about the new redistricting maps that a city commission had recently proposed. It's appalling—and we're just beginning to see the fallout."
Meh. Making mean spirited comments, bigoted comments, etc, don't amount to a hill of beans in identifying a true racist. In my opinion, there really aren't many true racists. I am in no way defending the LA council members, I don't care in the least what happens to them. I am just rebutting the notion that an "insensitive" comment about somebody doesn't really mean much.
It's indicative of the fact that Hispanics don't like Blacks and vice versa.
Here’s a list of things that were cited as fantastic “public services” by a “libertarian” publication which are in fact not public goods: roads, universities, schools and water systems.
None of these things are non-exclusive. They also are not "investments". They are bought with money taken from private citizens via the threat of violence. If I go to all my neighbors with a gun on my hip and say "Give me $1,000 so I can build a library. You can use it." that's not an investment. It's extortion.
I've been involved in several hundred thousand private conversations in my life. Normal people don't talk like this. Sure, I have on occasion heard racist or anti-gay stuff. But not usually. Most people are well-meaning and don't go out of their way to be insulting to other groups.
Politicians, people with the ambition of power, are almost universally awful people.