Polling Data Suggest That Student Loan Debt Relief Is Not Very Important to Young Voters
The new survey, released by Data for Progress, could spell trouble for Democrats hoping for gains in November following Biden's debt relief plan.

Recent polling suggests that Democrats might not get the boost from young voters they were hoping for this November, following the announcement of President Biden's sweeping student loan debt forgiveness plan.
According to data released on Monday by progressive polling group Data for Progress, Americans ages 18 to 29 rank student loan debt relief fairly low on their list of policy priorities for Congressional candidates. Only 8 percent of young people rank the subject as among their top three issues of concern. Thus, while the Biden administration appears to be banking on debt relief to gain votes during November's upcoming midterms, Data for Progress' polling suggests that young people's apparent focus on the issue may have been overblown.
In August, President Biden announced a student loan debt forgiveness plan which aims to forgive up to $20,000 in federal student loan debt for borrowers making under $125,000 each year, and married couples making under $250,000. The plan would also overhaul already-existing Income-Driven Repayment plans (IDRs), dramatically reducing the amount individuals in such plans would be required to pay back before loan forgiveness. In all, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the plan will cost $400 billion, not including IDR and other loan program changes.
Despite the plan's cost, it remains broadly popular with young people. According to Data for Progress, 65 percent of surveyed 18–29-year-olds expressed approval of Biden's student loan forgiveness plan—even though only 49 percent of respondents reported having or expecting to have student loan debt at some point in their lives. However, while the policy is viewed favorably among nearly two-thirds of young voters, the same group of voters doesn't view the policy as a major priority either—something that could spell trouble for Democrats.
In its survey of young people, Data for Progress' asked participants to select three policy issues out of a pool of 16 to rank as their "most important issues for a candidate for Congress to focus on." While student debt relief is a popular policy, it was also one of the least popular issues of top concern. Only 8 percent of respondents listed the issue among their top three, placing the topic near the bottom of respondents' priorities.
In contrast, economic issues took the top spots among survey respondents. Inflation, abortion rights, and jobs and the economy were the most popular issues cited as top priorities for Congressional candidates, with each subject present in over 30 percent of respondents' lists. "Government spending and the budget deficit," while not cracking the top half of important topics, still appeared in 12 percent of respondents' top concerns—four points more than for student debt relief.
This polling data paint a concerning picture for Democrats hoping to make major gains in upcoming midterms by banking on the wide popularity of student debt forgiveness. While voting behavior is determined by a myriad of reasons, this most recent survey offers little evidence of a strong cohort of single-issue voters for student debt relief.
While Democrats may have hoped that spending nearly half a trillion dollars on student loan debt forgiveness would help score voters in November's midterms, recent polling data from Data for Progress shed some doubt on that notion. Making matters worse, an obscenely expensive loan forgiveness plan stands to exacerbate the economic issues that seem to dominate young voters' concerns—most notably by reversing the effects of the Inflation Reduction Act, and then some.
How this dynamic will, or won't, play out in November remains to be seen. However, if things do go poorly for Democrats, it may prove a staggeringly expensive lesson on the hazards of focusing too intently on the wrong political issue.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Look, I said it's not important to me. I didn't say I didn't want it.
You offer me 10 grand, I'mma take it.
But I'd vote against it every time.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month (ams-06) simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
Democrats hoping for gains in November are delusional.
Just wait until they can turn around and accuse their evil opponents of wanting to take away YOUR FREE STUFF.
That could be the actual DNC strategy. Most of them have know the student debt issue did not poll strongly. But another chance to cast the GOP as anti-caring greedy capitalists must show positive numbers.
That's exactly their strategy. The GOP haven't bitten the lure, though. At least not on this one.
Which is strange, as they had members dumb enough to provide fuel for countless "The Far Right Republicans Are Out to Destroy Reproductive Rights" fliers landing in my mailbox.
Cato has sued. As have a couple of others. But the party in Washington hasn't made enough of a deal that Ds can spin it. Yet.
Despite the plan's cost, it remains broadly popular with young people.
Kind of like Social Security with centenarians?
You mean the people who actually funded it?
To be fair, they funded SS based on mortality numbers when they were working.
The money for that centenarian’s SS check is coming from *current workers*, not some mythical lockbox that the centenarian put money into during his/her working life.
Social Security is a wealth redistribution scheme just like welfare. It's just welfare that is unpopular to cut.
The money to pay off student loans is coming out of your wallet, the recipients of this giveaway contributed nothing.
That comment doesn't change the nature of what Social Security is.
I have to agree with Jeff here.
Fuck, all the money I’ve paid in has already been spent and I’m a good twenty-five years away from eligibility.
It is also very likely not true that the student loan recipients contributed *nothing*. Most if not all paid something towards their debts. Just not the full amount.
So then, morally justified. How about forgiving car loans as long as the buyers made a few payments?
It's essentially a government mandated Ponzi scheme.
And as far as wealth redistribution schemes go it's about as regressive as they get. Taking money from the relatively poor who have had no time to accrue wealth to give it to the relatively wealthy that have had decades to accrue wealth shouldn't be nearly as popular with progressives as it is.
That's difficult for me to believe.
Literally all my friends (progressives in their 20s with degrees in fields like social work and women's studies) are 100% on board with Democratic Party priorities: investigating 1 / 6, fighting a proxy war against Russia, and redirecting taxpayer money to themselves.
#BlueWave2022
Sorry, OBL. The only place you're going to see a blue wave this year is in a Bob Ross rerun.
every night @10:00 p.m. on the same channel as the Jazzy Vegetarian
CreateTV up here. Plus obviously YouTube.
I dunno. I put a toilet cookie in the tank over the weekend and I see a blue wave every time I flush.
I have a chia-Bob at the office.
Anyone with any sense of reality could have told you they are buying votes that are already secure. Nobody with any self-worth strives for the Big Guy to wipe out some of their debt.
My last paycheck was $2500 for working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 8k for months now and she works about 30 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out. The potential with this is endless.
This is what I do.........>>> OnlineCareer1
Maybe those votes weren't as secure as we think.
The party isn’t buying votes from yutes directly so much as buying goodwill from indebted media thought-leaders and columnists who are not guaranteed to stay on Team Joe without… inducement.
Contrary to what the media tells itself, most young people who are not morons who are going hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt to get a masters in puppetry. It is a special set of morons who managed to bankrupt themselves in student loan debt for worthless degrees. That set is influential in the media but is in terms of numbers fairly small and not that influential in society at large.
I've known a lot of people with useless degrees, mostly when I worked in restaurants. Next time you go out to eat ask your server if they went to college. Chances are they're quite educated.
I am quite aware of that. You are not wrong. But, that isn't all young people and not all of those people are drowning in debt. Some of them had parents who paid for college or had generous aid packages and such.
That was a long time ago. Maybe the younger generation learned from my generation's mistakes. That would be a good thing.
If my nieces and nephews are any indication, they are. I am getting to the point where my peers have kids going to college and I don't know anyone who has let their kid go into a bunch of debt. Some have had family money to pay for it, some have had really smart kids who got big aid packages, and some have chosen alternatives to college, but no one I know has kids graduating with a bunch of debt.
I think they are learning. Even for the top kids, it seems to be different. Twenty years ago, if you got into a top rated school out of college, you went no matter the cost. Today, if you get into a top school and don't have the money to write a check, you go to a lower rated school that is willing to give a big aid package to get you to go there.
There’s no way most of the $1.75 Trillion is for bullshit degrees. But good luck getting a breakdown of which majors incur the most debt.
I'm sure engineers and doctors rack up their fair share of debt, the point is that they have the means to pay it back on their own because they learned something useful.
The loudest people, the ones who "need" a bailout, are the ones with barista majors.
I've known a number of people who got all the way through medical school - hated the actual jobs in the field and quit a few years later.
I refuse to believe that there is anyone with a medical, engineering, or comp sci degree washing floors at Starbucks. These fields are desperate to hire almost anyone with a pulse. I suppose it's conceivable that a fair number of these people took out a bunch of debt to get a lucrative career, got the career, and then simply never paid off their debts because they spent every penny every month.
It probably depends on how onerous the licensing rules are.
Architecture grads in Texas have to get a Master’s degree AND do two years of internship (I think it’s like 360 credit days) before they can even sit for the exams. From anecdotes and observations, most firms don’t really help with that.
(And I’m not saying that means we need student loan bailouts, just so we’re clear.)
Political gimmick fails?
BFD.
Democrats need to dig deep into the cultural playbook like Dubya did when the GOP tried to ban gay kissing in 2004. It won him Ohio and four more years of Iraq.
No one tried to ban gay kissing. They just won't unban child pornography. Get over it you fucking pervert.
What? Fox News had an endless loop of gays kissing in Gay Pride parades in 2004 before the election. Democrats were all for gay rights and supported terrorists of course.
It was GOP agitprop at its finest.
DEMOCRATS WANT GAY TERRORISTS TO TEACH YER CHILREN!!
I recall it very well.
Opposing gay marriage? In 2004?!
You never would have supported Obama / Biden / Clinton so vigorously if they did anything so hateful!
The child porn you watch is not Fox News.
You recall the Republicans that live inside your decor dreams.
And the Democrats openly stood against fat marriage in 2004 too you lying sack of shit.
lol hilarious typo
Some Peanuts would call you boring and predictable, Mr. Buttplug. I prefer to say you're just admirably consistent.
This was me today at 9:45 AM: Can’t wait for Reason’s leading economics expert to deploy #DefendBidenAtAllCosts Category A: change the subject. He’ll explain that Cato shouldn’t bother opposing Biden on [student loan forgiveness] because Trump or Bush or Reagan did something worse.
Took you less than 2 hours to prove me right. 🙂
You're an observant little Peanut.
What is your fixation on Peanuts? I know the main characters are all children...
Democrats need to dig deep into the cultural playbook
Well, they are trying. They are trying to paint Republicans as authoritarian monsters who hate Democracy. And there is a small kernel of truth to that. But they are going a bit overboard in their accusations.
Nah. The situation really is as alarming as your favorite libertarian essayist Umair Haque has stated: either support DARK BRANDON, or support LITERAL FASCISM.
#LibertariansForBiden
>>Democrats ... hope ... spending ... would ... score voters
Republicans too. welcome to politics.
Yup. Both teams now use government money to buy votes.
When Republicans do something wrong it is horrible. When Democrats do something wrong, both sides do it.
Do you have any idea how transparent your mendacity is? It is comical how obvious your lying and sophistry are. I am not sure what is worse, that you do it or that you think no one notices.
You are pathetic. There is just no other word to describe you.
There is nothing more unreliable in social studies than an opinion poll, and even more useless would be trying to make predictions or drawing pragmatic conclusions about social policies based upon them. The most you can say is that power-mad politicians and career-minded officials can use poll results as excuses to do what they want to do anyway (or not do what they don't want to do) to further their political or government careers.
Does it matter anymore that polls are totally unreliable?
Perhaps we should point out that Hillary lost?
That Stacy Abrams lost?
The further to the right you are, the less likely you are to talk to pollsters, let alone tell the truth to one.
I try to answer pollster questions when they reach me on the phone (or occasionally at the door). But I always end up disqualified by the third question because I don't fit into the boxes they're looking for.
Anything more than a "yes" or "no", or a number from 1 to 5, is going to disqualify you. And not just political polls. I got the same shit when some marketing firm for a local radio station came by.
"Do you prefer new music or classic rock?"
"By 'classic' do you mean music earlier than 1980, or earlier than 2000?"
"I'm sorry sir, you don't fit our customer demographic".
Sorry, but Smashing Pumpkins is NOT classic rock!
My last paycheck was $2500 for working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 8k for months now and she works about 30 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out. The potential with this is endless.
This is what I do.........>>> OnlineCareer1
Kids weren't paying that debt anyway, their cosigner parents were.
What do you mean by their co-signer parents? With the exception of federal subsidized and un- subsidized loans 5000 total how can a 18 year old with no job and no credit history borrow money ?
But it IS important to a specific section of Biden voters. (Though the fact they even had to buy these people off is indicative of the trouble they're in)
It only makes sense that wise young people would be against this as all it does is give colleges yet another reason to increase tuition.
Considering that inflation is in the 8%-10% range, I am not worried about my student loan debt with it's 1.5% interest rate.
Having co-signed for a few loans myself I find it doubtful you have a student loan at 1.5 % . Medical students can’t borrow at those rates .
Fair enough. For the past 2.5 years, it's been 0%.
Sorry for the omission.
Seriously the last student loan I co-signed for from Sallie Ma was a little over 13 percent I have decent credit own a home etc and my daughter has a solid job 60 k Can you let me in on this please. My child has 1 yr of Grad school left .
Net loss in votes for democrats. But they’re not that bright, so.
Only the dead beat students care. Those that have paid of their loans certainly don’t, they are against this plan.
Or the ones that took 8 -12 years for something like Dance or Area, Ethnic and Civilization Studies, spent $200,000 on it, and can't find a job.
"Voting against their own interest?" Say it isn't so!
Oh wait, poll after poll shows that college-age students don't vote. $400B to buy the votes of a demo that don't vote, well done!