Gavin Newsom Cites Dubious Evidence That His Lockdowns Saved California's Economy
The governor made these claims on Monday while also putting a February 2023 end date on the state's emergency public health order.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is, at last, putting an end date on the public health emergency he declared over two years ago to fight COVID-19. The governor isn't letting his order go without trying to convince the world yet again that the dictatorial powers he claimed during the pandemic saved both lives and jobs.
"Throughout the pandemic, we've been guided by the science and data—moving quickly and strategically to save lives," said Newsom in a Monday press release. "The State of Emergency was an effective and necessary tool that we utilized to protect our state, and we wouldn't have gotten to this point without it."
The emergency is now set to sunset on February 28, 2023.
Every state in the country issued some sort of emergency declaration in response to the pandemic. What makes California conspicuous is the length of its emergency declaration and the breadth of powers Newsom claimed under it.
Only 12 states still have states of emergency in effect, according to the National Academy for State Health Policy's tracker. That includes states like Texas and Georgia which started easing off their COVID security state pretty soon into the pandemic.
California didn't do that.
Over the course of 2020 and much of 2021, the Golden State governor issued a number of "reopening" frameworks that shut down some industries almost completely and allowed others to remain open only under strict protocols of masking, social distancing, and capacity restrictions.
The most controversial of them all was the second stay-at-home order Newsom issued in December 2020. That dictate reimposed a near-lockdown on the state. It prohibited activities that were considered largely safe by that point, including attending public parks and eating at outdoor restaurants.
That order kicked off a wave of rebellions and noncompliance among retailers and restauranteurs and created a surge in support for the recall election against Newsom.
The pandemic was a mass death event. It was also a very messy one for determining the effects of particular public policy interventions on COVID transmission, death, and economic performance. It'll take years of research to get anywhere close to definitively answering big questions about what policies worked and what didn't.
As Newsom's Monday press release notes, California can boast a COVID death rate significantly lower than less restrictive states like Texas and Florida. As Newsom's press release doesn't note, California also has a lower COVID death rate than leading lockdown states like New York, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.
But the governor goes beyond claiming he kept more Californians alive. His press release also argues he kept the state's economy alive with his regime of business closures and restrictions. And the evidence he cites for this is thin indeed.
It includes a UCLA study from June 2021 that found that large states with more stringent "nonpharmaceutical interventions"—including business closures and mask mandates—performed better on average than states with less stringent interventions. By controlling the virus, people were more willing to engage in economic activity, the argument goes.
There's reason to think the UCLA study doesn't tell the whole story, however.
COVID, and COVID mitigation measures, obviously had varying effects on different industries. The authors of that study did exclude small states that might skew results by being overly reliant on one industry but otherwise didn't correct for a state's economic composition.
Plausibly, Texas did worse economically during 2020 because COVID-19 tanked demand for the oil and gas that the state produces. Likewise, tourism-dependent Florida isn't going to fare too well during a pandemic when far fewer people are going on vacation. The pandemic's shift to a world of working from home, grocery delivery, and binge-watching Netflix was probably a boon to California's tech sector.
And while California did better than Texas and Florida economically under the UCLA measure, Texas and Florida also outperformed harshly locked down New York.
An April 2022 working paper that adjusts a state's economic performance by industry composition finds Texas and Florida outperformed California.
Newsom's press release also throws in some incredibly silly stats that allegedly prove the state's tough approach to the pandemic produced good economic results. It claims that the state created the most businesses of any state since the start of 2019. It's odd to rope in a full year of pre-pandemic stats to prove that the state created a lot of businesses during the pandemic. That measurement also doesn't adjust for California's larger population or the other half of the ledger—the number of businesses that failed in the state. A quick look at the numbers shows that Texas gained more businesses and lost fewer per capita than California during the pandemic.
The focus on the economic variation in performance between states obviously doesn't account for the impacts that lockdown orders had on individual liberty, constitutionally limited government, and people's general psychological well-being. On all three metrics, we were clearly made worse off by the COVID leviathan.
The pandemic was a messy time. It will take lots of time and research to truly parse its impact and the impacts of policy responses to it.
But if Newsom is going to claim that his decision to close whole swaths of the economy by executive fiat was costless, he should try to find more convincing evidence.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Way too tedious. Much easier to just believe whatever Newsom says. Because of his hair, or something.
That shit eating, sociopath grin on the pic at the top of this article is exactly the grin he wore when exclaiming to the public that he totes masked and ate outdoors at the French Laundry when there are pictures proving otherwise. It is the grin that says, "We all know I'm lying, you just don't know what the actual lie is, because the people behind the camera all work for me. So fuck you!"
That shit eating, sociopath grin on the pic at the top of this article
I'm surprised Reason went with such an unflattering picture.
All the Ayn Rand villains are real now.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a (adc-53) lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
What lockdowns?
Liarson is at it again...
I am currently earning an additional $33,440 over the course of six months from home by utilizing incredibly honest and fluent online sports activities athletics. This domestic hobby provides the month. Given the stats system, I’m currently interacting fast on this hobby’s road and earning,
HERE====)>https://www.pay.hiring9.com
The emergency is now set to sunset on February 28, 2023.
The pandemic is over... *puts finger to earpiece*... in... February of 2023...
TwoThree years to flatten the curve!Massive waves of deaths in March of 2023.
The 9th Surge!
Sound familiar, anyone?
‘We underestimate the role of emotions and the persisting appeal of identity politics’, he said. ‘More and more’, he warned, ‘the rest of the world is not ready to follow’ the European model.
This to me, is the interesting one. It ain't us curmudgeon populists who are pushing identity politics.
Well said. This is a pretty vulgar comment section..but then our sleazy political hack (I live in Sacramento), “Twosome” Newsom, brings out the worst in thinking folks. I’m in medicine and the vaccines do work, the ~80% of us who are vaccinated have to deal with 2 fringe groups: the non-vaxers, who want to “die on that hill”. And the self righteous vaccine “cultists”, who are really obnoxious (and unscientific) with their unmitigated fear, anxiety and germophobia. As an aside if total lockdowns are so great, then China & Japan would be the epidemiologic models. You might as well stop the weather, so just add it to the yearly influenza regime.
"...I’m in medicine and the vaccines do work, the ~80% of us who are vaccinated have to deal with 2 fringe groups: the non-vaxers, who want to “die on that hill”. And the self righteous vaccine “cultists”, who are really obnoxious (and unscientific) with their unmitigated fear, anxiety and germophobia. .."
Thanks for your appeal to authority, but in my survey (sample size ~ 100) those vacced (me included) and those otherwise show pretty equal infection rates.
Got data to support your claims?
since when has Europe been considered the land of reason
Since the Age of Reason.
Not since the end of the Cold War.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, a TDS-addled pile of shit and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"Throughout the pandemic, we've been guided by the science and data—moving quickly and strategically to save lives," said Newsom in a Monday press release.
Well that’s debatable, uhh…
https://www.kcra.com/article/california-leaders-no-debate-plans-election-2022/41220787
Why would California Democrats debate? Seriously. This is just savvy politics.
Of course, CA democrats “debating” has got them in trouble recently:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RnC4pazbSd0
A wonderful glimpse into the inner workings of the dirtbags that run the state
"moving quickly and strategically to save lives"
The "speed of science", some may say.
Here’s an interesting site with lots of facts and stuff.
https://maximumtruth.substack.com/p/the-covid-fudge-factor
Summary:
It’s an interesting read.
Some interesting highlights were that after all was said and done, the difference in deaths between NY and FL was negligible, despite stark differences in policy (People in FL were more likely to die because they refused to get the vaccine, not because there were fewer restrictions).
Island nations like Australia, New Zealand and Japan fared better because they were able to shut down their borders to prevent people with COVID from getting into the country. That's not saying what they did was good and wonderful, just that it was effective.
It's not a political paper. He just crunches numbers.
One reason Mongolia did well is its high vaccination rate. One reason Mongolia did well is its low proportion of elderly people; only 4.2% of Mongolians are over age 65.
It's possible... probable even, that the latter factor was far more important than the former.
He points out that in places where old people had a chance to get vaccinated before they got infected, places like Australia and New Zealand, a much smaller proportion of old people died.
Those numbers must be wrong because that would contradict the conservative narrative which says the vaccine is worthless. The narrative can't possibly be wrong. So he must have made up the numbers.
Yes, because comparing island nations with small populations to large nations with land borders works so well.
Did you read what I wrote?
Let me try again.
In countries where old people got infected before they had a chance to get vaccinated, old people dropped like flies.
In countries where old people got vaccinated before they got infected, there was low death rate.
The conclusion is that the vaccine was actually effective at saving lives, especially the most vulnerable.
Sorry if that offends your politics.
So your claim is death rates for the elderly were the same for every country before vaccinations. Cite?
What? No. Read what I wrote or refer to the link in my original post.
Those numbers must be wrong because that would contradict the conservative narrative which says the vaccine is worthless.
If the “conservative narrative” can be described with the simple phraseology of “vaccine was worthless” then the liberal/progressive narrative can be described as “the vaccine is 100% safe and effective” and "stopped transmission of the virus cold, in its tracks".
I'm just repeating what I hear and read from conservatives, which is that the vaccine is at best a placebo and at worst a microchip.
The vaccine is a globalist plot designed to cull world population for the purpose of saving the environment.
Everyone knows that.
I've got an aunt in her 80s who won't get vaccinated because she's been told it's the Mark of the Beast: a microchip that the Antichrist will use to control the world. On the plus side she's a germophobe so the chances of her getting infected are low. But if she does...
Your aunt will probably outlive you, but then again, you are a blackout drunk.
You do realize that when you post stuff like that, the mean girls start fingering each others' assholes, right? There they are, in a circle, sitting on the hand of the mean girl next to them. "He said sarc's a drunk. Ooooooh that feels so goooooooood."
You've admitted to being one. Why is it even an insult?
Just so you know I skim over any sentence of yours containing any form of the word "admit" because it's just like "reveal" in that whatever follows is total bullshit.
No one said that, pedo. Remove your tinfoil hat next time.
It has been repeated ad nauseum in conservative kookoo land.
Also known as the "Bill Gates" CT.
People have said that on these here comments, and the usual suspects genuflected.
Only the voices in voices in your alcoholic brain say that.
You made at least six people swoon with that comment. I bet they got wet too.
Not one person here said that in any amount of seriousness.
You don't think Nardz and Sevo are serious? They are scary serious. Like they're going to kill people someday serious.
I assumed it was in reference to the Bill Gates microchip stuff.
I’ll blame this on stupid threading.
No. There are paranoids, all to the far right of the political spectrum as far as I can tell, who believe the vaccine is microchipped. Not like those things the size of a grain of rice that the put into pets. But something so small that they're dumbasses for thinking it's true.
I'm pretty sure that most self-identifying conservatives did actually take the vaccine, so that might be a bit of an overgeneralization.
People who think the vaccines are completely worthless are probably wrong. It does appear to reduce severe outcomes. People promoting the vaccines have also been full of shit on many points, way overselling both safety and effectiveness, glossing over the lack of long term data and pretending like the cost-benefit is the same for everyone.
I'm a lot less worried about the people with some nutty theories about the vaccines than I am about the people who think they should have the power to force everyone to take an experimental drug.
I've done some research into mRNA vaccines. Turns out the technology has been in development almost as long as I've been alive. It's not new technology.
Here's what really got my attention. The Moderna vaccine was created in two days.
You read that right. Two days.
It took a year or more to get approval, but the Moderna jab is the same thing that they started testing just two days after the company was told to make a vaccine.
No, it wasn't new. But it had never been deployed as a vaccine for a common virus or on a massive scale like this before. And there were reasons why that was.
I really, really hope that the vaccines turn out to be a net positive for humanity. But I think there are real reasons to be concerned that it might not be.
And there were reasons why that was.
Please elaborate. Nothing I've read said there was potential for harm. Just that it hadn't been used.
It's not as if no one had tried. There were a number of attempts to use mRNA for vaccines and other treatments, but they had too many safety problems in early trials to ever be really tested in humans. Here's one article from the before times (so I'm reasonably sure it isn't propaganda one way or the other): https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/10/moderna-trouble-mrna/.
I think overall it is good that the vaccines exist. For some people the cost-benefit works out. But rolling out a technology that has had major safety issues in the past on such a vast scale seems like a really bad idea. They have literally no idea what the long term effects at the population level will be. And the people promoting it have not been honest about the past safety problems or about relative risks to different populations.
I will read that. Thanks.
This is what I've gathered.
We have two levels of immunity. We've got the antibodies that stop us from getting sick in the first place, and we've got attack cells that drive out the invaders once they breach the perimeter.
Traditional vaccines train the former and ignore the latter. If you don't get sick you're doing great. If you do you're fucked.
mRNA vaccines train the latter. So they don't do dick to stop you from getting sick, but if you do then your body has a head start in fighting it off.
This resulted in many people (you see them in the comments) saying that mRNA vaccines do nothing because they don't stop you from getting sick. When I try to explain they call me a leftist, because science is now leftist propaganda.
You're smarter than that. So what is your concern?
I'm curious where you are getting this from. As I understand it, the mRNA vaccines don't do anything but stimulate production of antibodies to the spike protein.
“so that might be a bit of an overgeneralization."
Based on his posting behavior the last few weeks, that’s all he does. Under the guise of “joking around” of course. Overt gave him a pretty good take down regarding this.
Must be a guise. Nobody really jokes around.
Edit: People who say they're joking around are really serious. Completely and totally serious. It's only when they're called out on their bullshit that they claim to have been joking when everyone knows they were totally serious. That means you can take whatever they said when they claimed to be joking, and repeatedly post it over and over as the "real" truth. After all, it conflicts with the rest of what they say, which means that the rest of what they say must be a lie and what they said was a joke is the only true thing they ever said.
Exactly, you can go to the q-anon corners of the internet to describe the mainstream, conservative view of the vaccine. I just need to go to Dr. Fauci’s twitter, Rochelle Walensky’s twitter, and the CEO of Pfizer to get the “vaccines are 100% safe and effective, and stop transmission of the virus cold, in its tracks” version.
I wonder if there’s a material difference here. And I wonder which group was most likely to get kicked off twitter for spewing demonstrable bullshit.
Bowf sidezzzuh.
Cite?
The only people mentioning microchips are you and Jeff.
I've got citations from credible sources proving that I've had discussions with conservatives who really believe the vaccine is microchipped. They're right over here. Hold your breath while I go find them.
Cite?
Keep holding your breath.
I've almost got it.
Liar.
Do you ever engage in meaningful discussion without resorting to your tired schtick?
I mean, you start out so well providing an interesting read, but you always then have to follow it up with this embarrassing narrative.
Just trying to head off the usual suspects so my post doesn't have a half dozen turds stuck to it.
So, you're strategy is to turd up the thread first in order to prevent others from doing what you do? Interesting.
You still believe in Faucis Science despite all the myriad if admissions and studies since. It is amazing to watch. But I'm not shocked. The last thing you want to do is admit you were wrong for 3 years when everyone else told you that you were.
Age and obesity were the two primary factors for death from covid. Another of the increases for US elderly death was from ventilators used early on that according to many studies increased elderly death rates. Also low vitamin d is associated with worse outcomes from covid which the US generally has a higher population of.
But keep denying reality because a government liar told you a false narrative.
JesseAz says "You still believe" and everything that follows is bullshit.
The old threads still exist dummy. One of your go to arguments is pretending everything said more than 5 minutes ago didn't happen, but they did. I've cited them enough times.
The fact is the vaccines are only even slightly beneficial on the 50+ age group. Europe has already started only giving guidance to that group. This morning I posted the study that they may actually be more harmful overall to college students. And it is even worse with kids.
Every thing you attacked for 3 years is turning out to be true. And you will never allow for that fact to make you admit you were wrong.
Pfizer admitting they never tested for transmissibility probably pissed you off since you called people saying it didn't stop transmissions pussies for not getting the shot.
And it is laughable above saying you studied up on mRNA vaccines and then give the most top level summary from Wikipedia on when the research started. It is laughable because you and your team attacked on of the scientists who developed it for appearing on Rogan.
You've constantly ignored the side effects of the vaccine as well, implying they are safe. Ignoee the 83% in heart issues from kids, questions regarding lymph node activity maybe making cancers worse, increased heart issues since the vaccine, DMED data, etc. Ignore it all because a conservative pushed the claim even when the claim is true.
It is laughable but expected.
You're just making practiced arguments against things I never said. I'm not going to defend things I never supported. No amount of "You meant this! You're a liar! This is what you meant!" will get me to defend the words you put into my mouth.
I'm not going to play your game. If you want to debate what I actually think, then lets do that. Ask me what I think about something. I'll tell you. Then we can have a discussion.
Your "YOU SAID THIS A YEAR AGO WHICH MEANS YOU BELIEVE THIS AND THAT AND YOU'RE A LIAR AAUUUGHH!" schtick is older and worse than my "This article doesn't exist" shtick.
Ahold be 83% increase in heart issues for kids*
One reason Mongolia did well is its high vaccination rate.
A population of three million scattered on an area twice the size of Texas might have something to do with it.
Great point. That means he was a liar when he said vaccinations had an effect. Great catch. You just negated his entire study. You're so smart.
You’re embarrassing enough to get a job with this rag.
Keep up the personal attacks. Just proves you've got nothing intelligent to say.
It doesn't mean that. It wasn't in reference to that. You knew that.
Why would you have posted that if not to imply that vaccines are worthless?
When talking about Nordic countries he pointed out that they live very hermit-like lives, so COVID restrictions really weren’t a huge inconvenience. And that contributed to the lack of spread. The guy really tried to be thorough. If what he found contradicted how he felt or contradicted his politics, he continued anyway.
This 'study' looks highly cherry picked.
There are lots of responses to each point-- and I don't have an issue with the person making the points, it appears he's trying to be as honest as possible here, but he misses some major meta points.
—Vaccines worked to prevent death. Really well, and as advertised. They held western death rates down despite elderly and obese populations.
For instance, this is correct in the way that being technically correct is the best type of correct. No one serious disputed the effectiveness of the vaccine as a therapeutic to the most vulnerable populations.
When you look at the numbers, what becomes clear is that hospitalization and death for the vaccinated was reduced from a very low number to a very very low number.
There is nothing in the vaccination data that suggests that 100% of the population from children crowning during birth to 107 yr old wwi veteran with COPD needed the vaccine.
I've re-read this one about ten times, and it's confusing to me, but I'll take a stab at it:
—It’s not clear that even the most effective anti-Covid restrictions pass a cost-benefit test, when it comes to freedom versus safety (10-15 days added to every life.) Everyone has their own preferences, and we should settle such differences democratically, without censoring and demonizing people.
The 10-15 days added to every life is likely a bullshit metric. There is no way 10-15 days were added to 'every life' due to the 'safety' factor of the vaccine. (I won't even go into the fact that he's misusing 'safety' here. He should have stuck with 'efficacy'. Safety is... from a vaccinology point of view, a different subject. Efficacy is how well the vaccine worked, safety is how many people does it kill via adverse reaction).
This is where you get into the age and comorbidity stratification. Something that the Branch Covidian set is more often than not, unwilling to do. And unwilling to the point of unscientific obstinance. People have been kicked off youtube for stating 100% accurate COVID mortality data, and stratifying it by age. There is no question the vaccine would save many old people (although not all, and we have incontrovertible evidence of that), but writ large, it reduced hospitalization and death figures for the population most likely to die or be hospitalized from COVID. There is little evidence that it had any major impact-- if any at all-- for young healthy men and women. So kicking young kids out of school, firing young healthy adult men and women from their jobs based on the stated fact that the vaccine "stopped transmission" was a tragedy of freedom that should never have happened.
The 10-15 days added to every life is likely a bullshit metric.
I'll admit I cheated here. I listened to an interview before I read the study. The interview is behind a paywall though.
https://politicalorphanage.libsyn.com/
This is how he came up with 10-15 days. He took the people who died, estimated how much time was lost, and then spread that over the population.
In this case the dead people were mostly old, so they had ten or so years left.
Contrast that with a disease that kills children who have, say, seventy years left. The total time lost would be much higher, and that 10-15 days life lost per person might be 10-15 years.
He mentions but rather ignores a very salient point in his "extra life" calculation--that sick people tend to die from pandemics. A 75-year old who dies of covid was less likely to live to the life expectancy by virtue of the very fact that covid killed him. Overcount.
He's also taking excess deaths and calculating remaining lifespan. No way to separate those excess deaths that occurred due to lockdowns, healthcare shutdowns, and yes, even vaccines--all of which affected a much younger population than covid itself. Overcount.
If anything, he's being extremely generous with the 10-15 days.
The Political Orphanage is a podcast by none other than Andrew Heaton who used to do "Mostly Weekly" and still occasionally contributes other funny shit to Reason.
The other uncontrolled factor is that treatment for covid was better understood post vaccine from prior, and the virus itself had become less deadly overall. Without those control factors, the correlation to vaccines is mostly correlation.
The safety issue is another thing entirely woth new study after new study saying mass vaccinations for non at risk groups was likely overall more harmful than the vaccine helped.
The safety issue is another thing entirely woth new study after new study saying mass vaccinations for non at risk groups was likely overall more harmful than the vaccine helped.
Very possible.
And with the massive excess death count that everyone seems to be whistling past the graveyard on... we may never know the true toll of vaccine side effects.
If you read the thing I posted, he focused on excess deaths because he figured no governments could be trusted to give true COVID numbers. But they have to count dead bodies. For tax purposes if anything.
The other uncontrolled factor is that treatment for covid was better understood post vaccine from prior, and the virus itself had become less deadly overall.
First part yes. I can see that as an argument. Second part no. The second part could easily be explained by vaccinations and that the weak had already been culled from the herd.
He addresses this very point in the study. He originally pointed out that Omicron was only 80% as deadly as the first few waves but was corrected by a commentor that it was 80% less deadly. This shoots a big hole in the vaccination effectiveness argument.
"Throughout the pandemic, we've been guided by the science and data—moving quickly and strategically to save lives,"
To quote the old, worn out Luke Skywalker, everything you just said is wrong.
Yes it is an objectively false statement. A complete and total lie. There is not now, nor was there then, any science or data that supports masking and lockdowns.
>>public health emergency ... to fight COVID-19
one phantasm ... and one outright lie
I made over $700 per day using my mobile in part time. I recently got my 5th paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.
Try now...........>>> OnlineCareer1
Just looking at him makes me feel slimey.
He looks like a stereotypical politician. Absolute evil, with a veneer of smarm.
Of course his lockdown did not "save" the state economy just like some wingnut governor did not save his by reopening early.
Fatass Donnie's handouts didn't save the economy. Sleepy Joe's handouts didn't save the economy.
They are all politicking.
Bullshit. Compare Iowa and Illinois; Indiana and Illinois; oh hell, any state that didn't lockdown twice like Illinois did. Illinois is lagging way behind them on every metric, with people and companies actually leaving the state due to Fatass Pritzker's policies. That fucker still hasn't lifted his Covid emergency.
Is the economy in Illinois functional today? Of course it is. Who saved it?
You give asshole politicians too much credit.
I am a skeptic. We don't need them as much as you think we do.
Functional? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
Don't make me laugh too hard. To put it mildly, Illinois is the California of the Midwest in all the worst ways with none of the benefits (climate, mountains, coastline).
Wingnuts did just as much to save their economies as the progtards.
Maybe more since some of them got out of the way sooner (like Kemp) - even though Donnie-Boy warned him not to.
I hate progressives or "progtards" but I also hate conservatives. They both suck.
Hayek saw conservatives as slow-witted and ignorant. I agree with Hayek.
“Slow witted and ignorant” describes a lot of progtards.
You're an idiot.
DeSantis didn't save Florida's economy, and he never claimed to. He simply refrained from strangling it like Newsom did to California.
-jcr
I live here; he didn't save shit! And anyone who says otherwise is full of shit. At least in Eldo we didn't follow his rules too much. But it still sucked when I went down the hill. But we deserve it for voting him in and we will continue to suffer as long as we vote for the same tards.
The time he closed restaurants that had just spent tens of thousands on outdoor seating and plexiglass and heaters was a good example.
My town revolted. Downtown the restaurants opened up. Many indoor and outdoor. Some complied, and it hurt them badly, but most were at a "stay open or close forever" crossroads.
We had the lowest infection rates in the county, mostly. But, after we opened up all the shops and eateries and they put the signs out saying "Welcome to the French Laundry" and "This is a Mostly Peaceful Protest" we had -- well, still the lowest infection rates in the county.
Nothing changed. Except small business owners kept their businesses. Can't say that's true of a couple of my favorites who had to close or sell by the summer, including a place I'd gone for lunch a couple times a month for over 20 years.
Maybe pointing out that it is the belief in such a construct as “public health” that allowed government actors to appropriate funds to create COVID in the first place, and thereby end the lives of millions, would also come into play here. If individuals simply looked out for themselves rather than attempting to signal how virtuous they are to others and give governments the ability to fund gain of function research, we wouldn’t have silly articles squabbling about statistics and number fudging from politically motivated economists. Leave it to Reason to avoid these salient points which make pointing out the inconsistent logic of economists a waste of time, and instead engage fully in the time wasting while the government uses the same principles of intervention as they used to create the virus, and then used those same principles to create economic havoc, to do more harm to us while we break down and analyze the governments faulty statistics endlessly. If you know the government is motivated to reach certain conclusions (their interventions are beneficial) maybe don’t engage with arguments you logically know are reaching for predetermined conclusions and instead point out what is actually happening.
Well, public health is a real thing even though it was sorely abused in the current example to justify things that had nothing whatever to do with public health. I earned a Masters of Public Health degree, during which I learned how to use statistics and epidemiology tools to analyze threats to the public health and sort out good responses from bad responses. For at least a decade before the COVID epidemic struck experts in infectious diseases, public health and epidemiology concluded from massive evidence that lockdowns would do far more harm than any minor good they might do. Their recommendations against dramatic social responses to try to mitigate the effects of bad viral epidemics were built into almost every governmental response plan in the world, but the moment the news stories erupted all that evidence-based medicine went out the window, the politicians panicked or chuckled with glee at the opportunity to grab power. So don't blame public health for this. Blame politicians and public health officials.
Hang those politicians and public health officials.
Public health is a real thing.
But the thing is like -- don't shit in the drinking water it gives everyone cholera.
It's not dictating the daily habits of every individual in the nation.
Blame politicians and public health officials.
This is true. Recall the Dems initial reaction to covid: that anyone concerned was a racist and the appropriate action was to go to Chinese New Years celebration and hug any ethnic Chinese you can find.
Then of course the issue turned serious and they risked looking like fools. So they held a summit at which they decided two things:
1. The best way to prevent being accurately described as negligently spreading the virus was to become the militantly restrictive party.
2. The best way to blunt Trump's best campaign pitch is to shut down the economy.
So Pelosi went from claiming if you didn't Hug a Han you were racist to anyone leaving the house is killing grandma in about three weeks. And of course "Public Health Officials" revealed they are really left wing political activists.
At least California has a date for ending the "emergency". We're still waiting here in Illinois while Governor Commodius Maxiumus renews his own emergency every freaking month.
He really needs to form his own nationwide coalition—The Douche Bag Party!
Isn't that also known as the Democrat Party?
Pretty much, these ones just contain more vinegar. Automatic inductees to be drafted include Liz Warren and AOC (oh…and pretty much anyone whose last name is Cuomo)
He was guided by the science and the data to ignore the science and the data and do what he wanted to do anyway which was pretend to use the science and data to justify the lockdown orders. Now he has to ignore the science and the data to pretend that his lockdown orders helped everyone without hurting anyone. And so it goes in the world of power-mad career politicians.
"Throughout the pandemic, we've been guided by the science and data—moving quickly and strategically to save lives,"
The SCIENCE told him to go to the French Laundry and lock up lone beachgoers!
Fuck Gavin Newsome
"As Newsom's Monday press release notes, California can boast a COVID death rate significantly lower than less restrictive states like Texas and Florida."
If you look at California's death rate during the actual lockdowns, you see that Florida and Texas performed better than California. It was only in late 2021 after most lockdowns had stopped that california started doing better and Florida/Texas had bad seasons. The idea that lockdowns had anything to do with this is laughable at best.
Newsom is as bad at telling the truth as Mike and Jeffy.
No one ever said ________________________________________
Everyone: *posts video of major public figures saying _____________________________________*
Wanna know where California's death rate really went off the charts? Freedom. Liberties were slain and left dead on the side of the road in numbers far exceeding many other states in the union.
Fuck off with your studies about how forcing people in cages saves their lives.
I'll tell you, I'll never vote for another Democrat. Ever. No matter what.
I've said before, the devil himself could manifest on earth and run for governor on a platform of hellfire and brimstone, but if his opponent was a Democrat I'd give his ideas a listen.
The fact that people will willingly force others to give up their liberty, economic freedom, and basic society for so long has soured me on humanity. But the monoparty state is the worst of the worst here. No check, no balance, no press willing to ask hard questions about the propaganda. The worst of all worlds.
That smile of his.
I can't tell if it's more like The Joker, or Christian Bale's face in American Psycho.
Duke was really more of a Pop-Opera.
Why not both? The demon love child for The Joker and Patrick Bateman. You know Newsom does that skin peel thing every morning. My gawd he even looks like Bateman.
I'm glad I live on the literal opposite corner of the country.
Hint, Brandyshit: We had a POTUS who avoided all efforts at mandates, and TDS-addled assholes like you opposed him every way you could.
Stuff your TDS up your ass, steaming pile of shit.
So if hte lockdown saved the California's economy, then I guess his maskless soiree at a five star restaurant is what actually tanked it.
Nothing this fucktard hypocrite ever says again should be taken seriously.
Oh, and you think this shit is over? Think again.
XBB, BQ.1.1, BA.2.75.2 — A variant swarm could fuel a winter surge
The pace of evolution is so fast that many scientists depend on Twitter to keep up.
You know who else relies on Twitter to keep up?
Viral epidemics will NEVER be over. Instead of learning that lockdown edicts were a bad idea - again - from the most recent viral epidemic, they will continue to try to use them as an excuse to issue "emergency" edicts that never end to combat viral "emergencies" that never end. I don't care what you name the most recent subvariant of the most recent variant of "the flu" - it's still a bad idea. Our only hope is that people - finally - start ignoring emergency edicts and - when the really get fed up - vote the idiots out of office.
Now that it's scary, they will once again acknowledge seasonality (without REALLY saying it).
"Dubious" evidence?
That's one hell of an understatement.
Rule 1: Don't look like or be seen to associate with Republicans.
Rule 2: If the evidence leads you into violating Rule 1, return to Rule 1.
Christ, what a shitbag.
He actually said that?!!?!?!?!?
That's not only wildly inaccurate - it's cruel.
He put people out of business and out of work. Personally. He decided what businesses were "essential" - who got to support himself and who had to starve.
He can go to Hell.
I made over $700 per day using my mobile in part time. I recently got my 5th paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.
Try now...........>>> OnlineCareer1
'The governor lied about this on Monday while also putting a February 2023 end date on the state's emergency public health order.'
Much as it might pain you, you are encouraged to be honest.
The tin-pot-dictator wannabe knee-capped the CA economy for the better part of two years, and like Gorby and the black-market in food, his ass was saved from disaster by those ignoring his mandates.
Gavin Newsom Cites Evidence That His Lockdowns Saved California's Economy
ROTFLMAO!