Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Drugs

Don't Blame Migrants and 'Open Borders' for Fentanyl Entering the Country

U.S. citizens traveling through legal ports of entry—not undocumented immigrants—are primarily to blame for fentanyl inflows.

Fiona Harrigan | 10.17.2022 6:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Blue fentanyl pills over an image of the U.S.-Mexico border | Illustration: Lex Villena; Sgt. 1st Class Gordon Hyde, DEA
(Illustration: Lex Villena; Sgt. 1st Class Gordon Hyde, DEA)

When politicians and pundits on the right call for the U.S.-Mexico border to be secured, they often point to rising fentanyl overdose deaths among Americans as justification.

"The cartels are exploiting President Biden's open borders," charged Sen. Ted Cruz (R–Texas), sharing an article about fentanyl at the southern border. "Open borders…are slowly but surely poisoning our country," said former Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R–Ga.) of parents who "now must worry" about Halloween candy laced with fentanyl. "There have been over 100k fentanyl deaths" since Joe Biden became president, tweeted the conservative Heritage Foundation. "OPEN BORDERS ARE INHUMANE."

That line of reasoning has also caught on with the general public, judging by an August NPR/Ipsos poll. When presented with the statement, "Most of the fentanyl entering the U.S. is smuggled in by unauthorized migrants crossing the border illegally," 39 percent of respondents said it was true. Twenty-three percent of Democrats called it true, while 60 percent of Republicans did.

Despite the idea's sticking power in certain circles, it's inaccurate to say that undocumented immigrants crossing an open border are chiefly responsible for fentanyl arriving at the country's doors. In reality, U.S. citizens carrying the drug through legal ports of entry are primarily to blame.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has reported an upward trend in fentanyl seizures over the past few years. From 2,800 pounds seized in FY 2019, CBP seized 11,200 pounds of fentanyl in FY 2021 and 12,900 pounds in FY 2022 through the end of August.

Seizures conducted by two distinct bodies within CBP combine to yield those numbers. The first, the Office of Field Operations (OFO), enforces immigration and customs laws at ports of entry—points where someone may lawfully enter the United States. The second is U.S. Border Patrol, which intercepts undocumented individuals and illegally imported goods between those ports of entry.

The vast majority of fentanyl seized in recent years has been obtained by the OFO, not Border Patrol. The drug was mainly seized from smugglers at legal ports of entry, not illegal border crossings. OFO seizures amounted to 2,600 pounds in 2019 (93 percent of the total fentanyl seized by CBP), 4,000 pounds in 2020 (83 percent), 10,200 pounds in 2021 (91 percent), and 10,900 pounds so far in 2022 (84 percent). The Drug Enforcement Agency confirms the port trend, saying that "the most common method employed [by Mexican cartels] involves smuggling illicit drugs through U.S. [ports of entry] in passenger vehicles with concealed compartments or commingled with legitimate goods on tractor-trailers."

Per David Bier, associate director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, some people might wrongly think that "less fentanyl is interdicted between ports of entry because it is more difficult to detect there." But Bier notes that it's far easier for smugglers to conceal drugs while entering the U.S. at legal crossings (i.e., in vehicles) than it is for someone to cross the border undetected. "We've seen some instances perhaps of migrants and drugs as a mixed event," said Brian Sulc, executive director of the Department of Homeland Security's Transnational Organized Crime Mission Center, in congressional testimony in May. "But they're still rare."

The fact that so much fentanyl smuggling takes place at legal border crossings helps explain why U.S. citizens are the main traffickers there. "In order to smuggle fentanyl through a port of entry, cartels hire primarily U.S. citizens, who are the least likely to attract heightened scrutiny when crossing into the United States," writes Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy director at the American Immigration Council. Reichlin-Melnick analyzed every CBP press release and official Twitter post mentioning fentanyl seizures from December 2021 to May 2022. Only two involved people crossing between ports of entry, and of the 42 incidents where CBP mentioned a smuggler's nationality, 33—or 79 percent—involved U.S. citizens.

Data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC) highlight a similar national trend. From FY 2015 through FY 2021, the USSC reported 4,459 people charged with federal fentanyl trafficking; just 659 of them were noncitizens. Most Border Patrol drug seizures at checkpoints from FY 2016 through FY 2020 involved only U.S. citizens carrying marijuana, according to a Government Accountability Office report published in June. Of all drug seizures during that period, 91 percent involved just U.S. citizens, while 4 percent involved "potentially removable people."

In reality, Border Patrol apprehends an exceedingly small number of people carrying fentanyl. "Just 279 of 1.8 million arrests by Border Patrol of illegal border crossers resulted in a fentanyl seizure—too small of a percentage (0.02 percent) to appear on a graph," writes Bier, "and many of these seizures occurred at vehicle checkpoints of legal travelers in the interior of the United States." Though it's obviously difficult to predict how much fentanyl could be carried by migrants who go unapprehended by Border Patrol, the tiny share of apprehended migrants who are found carrying fentanyl suggests that amount could be quite small.

Discussions of border enforcement often mash together fentanyl overdose deaths and unauthorized border crossings with little eye to how they actually relate. That's bad enough, since it often leads politicians to condemn migrants for an issue they have little to do with. Even worse is the fact that scapegoating foreigners only helps to obscure the factors that are truly driving overdose deaths in the United States.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Press Idolizes Politicians. Instead, It Needs To Hold Them Accountable.

Fiona Harrigan is a deputy managing editor at Reason.

DrugsImmigrationBorder CrossingsBordersDrug PolicyFentanylLaw & GovernmentBorder patrol
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (111)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. JesseAz   3 years ago

    If we can prove one pill didnt cross a border, you are wrong for blaming all the other pills crossing the border. It is purely black or white.

    1. NancyKelly   3 years ago

      GOOD

      1. evakaim12   3 years ago (edited)

        Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a (ad-03) lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs

        Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/

    2. SQRLSY One   3 years ago

      "Don't Blame Migrants and 'Open Borders' for Fentanyl Entering the Country"

      OK, then, can we, instead, blame the Lizard People who STOLE THE VOTES away from Dear Leader, AKA Our Fearless Emperor, Der TrumpfenFuhrer? All GOOD "Team R" Tribe Members in GOOD Standing will follow MEEEEE on THIS highly fraught issue, dammit!!!!

      1. jbrennan 2   3 years ago

        Are not Mexicans making the shit? Then yes it's coming from illegals. Christ

    3. OliviaOnline   3 years ago (edited)

      I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
      For more detail visit this site.. http://www.Profit97.com

  2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    I have a question for the libertarian phoolosophers out there...

    A lot of the libertarian criticism of the War on Drugs points to the rise of fentanyl as a negative consequence of making less deadly opioids illegal. From the all-drugs-should-be-legal perspective... what's wrong with Fentanyl?

    1. Ecoli   3 years ago (edited)

      If Fentanyl were legal and available, what do you think the OD death rate would be for users?

      By the way, I don't really consider myself to be particularly Libertarian. The phool label certainly applies though.

      1. JesseAz   3 years ago

        Portland and Seattle are doing those trial runs. Overdoses are going up.

        1. IceTrey   3 years ago

          Drugs aren't actually legal there. You can't buy heroin at the CVS. It's still street drugs.

      2. Moderation4ever   3 years ago

        An interesting thought experiment, so let take a look at the idea. First point is that there is pharmaceutical fentanyl used to treat cases of severe pain. So, it is legal for certain uses. Assuming that other drugs were available would a user go to fentanyl? What is the advantage of fentanyl for a user? So now you get to the point where you have a user, fentanyl is their preferred option, and they can go to a pharmacy or distributor to get a pill with a known amount of the drug? It seems likely that overdoses would go down. Would they be eliminated, doubtful. People mishandle prescription medication all the time and if you're looking to commit suicide, fentanyl seems to be a good choice as its LD50 is 10 times lower than morphine.

        1. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

          The barn door is already open. Fentanyl now has a pretty big following.

        2. Libertariantranslator   3 years ago

          Fiona is not arguing for less coercion, but rather, for importation of 8 billion ragamuffins to within a borderless, anarchist USA where murder is legal. That or the imperialist conquest--starting with retaking the Philippine Islands--of every country between Brownsville and Esperanza Base under a Monroe-Doctrine dictatorship as Possessions-without-citizenship, much like Long Dong, Palito, and Bundes Madschen recently ignored for Samoa. I honestly believe Fiona would repeat the Clinton, Bush and Bush demands for the death sentence for twigs and seeds if it would arguably import another billion paupers, preferably of the terrorist persuasion.

    2. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

      If all drugs were legal, most of the problems with Fentanyl would be ameliorated. Illicit Fentanyl is of uncertain dosage, and often is used to enhance or substitute for other drugs. It is because it is so unpredictably powerful when not properly mixed and dosed that it is so deadly to users. But—all drugs are NOT legal and won't be. That means lives can be saved by suppressing Fentanyl importation. I recommend a declaration of war against the Mexican crime cartels. A few cruise missiles on the haciendas of the crime bosses would do more to reduce drug and human trafficking than more border security.

      1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

        Yes, more killing solves problems.

        1. JeremyR   3 years ago

          If often does, but that's not a reason to

        2. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

          Yes, killing people who are killing us solves a problem.

      2. JesseAz   3 years ago

        Are you sure about that?

        https://morningstarjournal.com/2022/06/06/overdose-deaths-rise-in-oregon-after-drug-legalization/

        1. ElvisIsReal   3 years ago

          We're still talking about the difference between a legal and open market and underground drugs.

          1. JesseAz   3 years ago

            Based on a fallacy drug users are rational. They are not.

            You can argue there should be a freedom to use drugs without creating a fallacious argument about drug users becoming rational.

            Users will use. They will continue to increase dosage. They will use unsafe practices.

            1. Davedave   3 years ago

              There is no such fallacy or assumption. It is simply proven fact that prohibition increases all the harms, compared to non-prohibition. Same drug users, different outcomes, and not, as you correctly identify, due to a sudden outbreak of rationality.

              That said, given the imperatives drug addicts face - 'needing' a high, etc - they do in fact make rational choices about how to pursue their goals. Given the choice between an easy, legal, safe (and sufficient) high, and the same high with risks of prison, death, and so-on, they will of course choose the former.

              1. Libertariantranslator   3 years ago

                NO. To Fiona, being denied uninspected invasion across the U.S. border is clearly what increases all the harms. I'll bet $5 she will fight tooth and nail against decriminalizing--or, GASP! legalizing--cigarettes, Cheetos, weed or bottled water unless it could be proven to import at least a couple of hundred million paupers innocent of so much as a single word of English. How such a maniacally blinded anarchist invader got Reason to PAY for her articles is as mysterious as why anyone would donate another penny for that purpose.

      3. m40195971   3 years ago

        You’re an idiot. Illicit drugs are not held to quality control. Neither are legal drugs.

        The FDA has very few inspectors and relies on companies to assure they’ve done quality assurance testing. State health regulators are the same, except using crime labs if deaths are the result of substances.

        The government can’t even assure the quality of “legal” nutritional supplements. What makes you think that “legal” mind altering drugs will be of any assured quality? That’s just idiotic.

        1. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

          You're an idiot. Drug companies have no interest in killing their customers.

          1. Homple   3 years ago

            Drug companies also have no interest in losing multi $billion lawsuits because idiots overdose on their entirely legal, prescription-only products*, let alone from selling over the counter ones. Selling unprescribed potentially lethal dugs will be business suicide.
            *Ask the Sackler family how this works.

            1. IceTrey   3 years ago

              People die from alcohol everyday.

              1. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

                A microscopic proportion of alcohol customers die every day, usually after decades of purchases. Improperly dosed Fentanyl will kill you on the first try.

                1. Davedave   3 years ago

                  Improperly dosed alcohol, or badly distilled bootleg alcohol, can kill you with the first gulp.

                  1. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

                    Which is why the manufacturers don't sell shit like that.

                  2. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

                    I’ve never heard of that happening in my lifetime. I’m sure it has, but it has to be such an outlier that it’s irrelevant.

                    1. Davedave   3 years ago

                      It's common in places where alcohol is illegal or over-taxed - it might as well be illegal if the legal stuff costs so much due to tax that it's wildly unaffordable. Which is the point. This stuff doesn't happen with legal drugs, it does happen with illegal ones.

                    2. R Mac   3 years ago

                      It’s common in Canada?

                    3. JSinAZ   3 years ago

                      He got his still from Amazon…

                      “A Man Drank Two Liters of Moonshine in Two Hours: This Is What Happened To His Eyes”

                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DQUrg0Yhu4

          2. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

            This.

        2. docduracoat   3 years ago (edited)

          To m401… That’s completely wrong. The fentanyl I use in the operating room is guaranteed to be sterile and to contain 50 micrograms of fentanyl per milliliter. I am certain the drug companies batch test some of every production run. I have never said “this fentanyl seems weaker than last weeks fentanyl” It’s always exactly the same strength

    3. JeremyR   3 years ago

      Nothing. From a purely libertarian angle, people should be allowed to take cyanide if they want, as long as they know the consequences.

      From a more utilitarian viewpoint, if people know the quality and dosage of the drugs they are taking, they can use them safer.

      And there is also the moral aspect. Hunter Biden has probably taken every drug ever made (and spends lots of money on hookers), yet he suffers no legal penalties. Why should other people?

      1. JesseAz   3 years ago

        They can. But drug users chasing the high aren't rational, constantly upping their dosage.

        Why do we need to pretend against reality. You can argue like for freedoms without claims of a nirvana forming. Drug users will continue to be irrational.

        1. Stuck in California   3 years ago

          Same is true of Alcohol. Folks who abuse alcohol are not rational and very self destructive, even though they can buy booze at a liquor store.

          So, what's your take there? Are you proposing prohibition here? Because that didn't exactly make things better a century ago when it was tried.

          1. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

            Actually, it did. Disease and death from alcohol plunged during Prohibition. Unfortunately, Prohibition also had serious adverse effects.

            1. Davedave   3 years ago

              "Disease and death from alcohol plunged during Prohibition. "

              This simply isn't true. Alcohol-related deaths _rose_ during prohibition.

            2. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

              Freedom is messy. Gandhi had so,e pretty good thoughts on the subject when the British said they had to stay in charge of India to protect the Indians.

      2. Homple   3 years ago

        Fine with me, as long as the people selling the cyanide aren't held financially responsible for the people who off themselves with the stuff.

        But hearse chasing lawyers and families with sob stories would inevitably bleed dry any cyanide vendors.

        1. IceTrey   3 years ago

          Not in Libertopia. If there's no force involved there's no victim.

      3. Libertariantranslator   3 years ago

        Um... other persons as in Section 2, Article 3 (slaves and pregnant women) or other persons as in the 96% who routinely beg The Kleptocracy to rob, murder and enslave them lest the other half of said Kleptocracy rob, murder and enslave them first?

    4. R Mac   3 years ago

      “I have a question for the libertarian phoolosophers out there…

      A lot of the libertarian criticism of the War on Drugs points to the rise of fentanyl as a negative consequence of making less deadly opioids illegal.”

      As a libertarian phoolosopher, that might be true but I’m not sure, and it shouldn’t be part of the libertarian argument regardless, so the libertarians making that criticism should make different criticisms.

      “From the all-drugs-should-be-legal perspective… what’s wrong with Fentanyl?”

      It has a high potential for overdose. I recommend you avoid it.

    5. IceTrey   3 years ago

      Nothing but it's very powerful. The dose is the poison.

      1. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

        The unpredictability of the dose is the poison.

      2. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

        For anyone who doesn’t remember, here is Reason’s interview with an actual anesthesiologist from 2017 (when they still published a few decent articles) on the subject.

        https://reason.com/2017/09/22/no-simply-touching-fentanyl-cant-kill-yo/

  3. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

    You know what? Even if migrants smuggled in 100% of fentanyl I'd still support open borders. As a Koch / Reason libertarian all I care about is making Charles Koch and other billionaires even richer. An increase in loser junkies OD'ing is a small price to pay for all that additional cost-effective foreign-born labor.

    #CheapLaborAboveAll

    1. Ecoli   3 years ago

      OBL, you have your priorities straight. As usual. Given her journalistic record, I am sure Fiona agrees.

      1. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

        Once upon a time I feared Reason would never find a suitable replacement for Shikha Dalmia. Didn't think her commitment to billionaire-funded open borders advocacy could be matched.

        I realized I was wrong when Fiona submitted her dozenth minor rewrite of her "Russia attacking Ukraine proves the US needs open borders like my benefactor Charles Koch has been demanding since long before Russia attacked Ukraine" column.

        #WarIsGoodBecauseItCreatesRefugees

        1. Ecoli   3 years ago

          Fiona is still a little wet behind the ears but she shows tremendous potential!

          1. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

            She’s certainly wet to the knees for open borders. And that’s what matters.

  4. Jerryskids   3 years ago

    Don't Blame Migrants and 'Open Borders' for Fentanyl Entering the Country Anything

    FTFY

    1. MistyPowell   3 years ago (edited)

      I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless.

      Here’s what I've been doing..........>>> OnlineCareer1

  5. Jimmy Jazz   3 years ago

    I would suppose the author knows how much fentanyl is not passing through check points rather then through wide open spaces of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona or California.

    1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   3 years ago

      The cops write all their tickets right outside the donut shop at 4th and Main, proving there is no speeding anywhere else in town

  6. Tony   3 years ago

    Are the immigrants shoving the pills down our innocent citizens' throats too? Personal responsibility for thee, build a wall for me.

    The Republican playbook is not that complicated. Pick a social problem and blame brown people. I'm surprised they haven't managed to blame their own fat asses on Mexican food.

    1. Ecoli   3 years ago

      The Democratic playbook is oh so subtle: Defend every societal problem as a result of white supremacy. Whitey be bad, very bad.

      1. Tony   3 years ago

        So have a lollipop and a cry you damn snowflake.

        Also Republican playbook: find some loud, radical college student who said something provocative in TikTok and claim that's the entire Democratic party platform.

        1. JesseAz   3 years ago

          Because it isnt Bidens political nominees also pushing the bullshit. You say stupid things.

          1. Tony   3 years ago

            I don't suppose it matters that the long history of white supremacy in America is not actually bullshit.

            1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

              Perhaps white supremacy is what makes everyone want to live here.

            2. R Mac   3 years ago

              Nobody cares about your ignorance of human history.

            3. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

              And people say lefties don't go for conspiracy theories.

              1. Inquisitive Squirrel   3 years ago

                Tony's huge into BlueAnon conspiracy theories.

            4. Inquisitive Squirrel   3 years ago

              When all you can claim is "white supremacy!" to uphold your position, your position is quite weak.

        2. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

          You’re the bitchy little queen crying ‘racist’. It’s all you have.

        3. The New Number Two   3 years ago

          The entire Democratic platform? No. The future base of the Democratic Party? The demographic whose utopian energy, moral self-adoration, pathological need for universal "affirmation," fear of and contempt for dissent, and collective shame (the only kind they feel) for their own civilization and its history the Boomer Democrats so admire and desperately want to exploit for their own political enrichment? Yes.

    2. SQRLSY One   3 years ago

      "I’m surprised they haven’t managed to blame their own fat asses on Mexican food."

      Hey wait a minute! I resemble that remark! My fat ass ***IS*** to be blamed on Mexican food!!!

      (ALSO my failure to PROPERLY vote for Der TrumpfenFuhrer is to be blamed on DASTARDLY Mind Control from the Lizard People!!!! I had sincerely meant to do MUCH better than this!!! Thus, for want of a vote, the Kingdom of Trumpdom was STOLEN, I'm a-tellin' ya!!!!)

    3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      Are the immigrants shoving the pills down our innocent citizens’ throats too? Personal responsibility for thee, build a wall for me.

      No, the pharmaceutical companies are responsible for that.

    4. IceTrey   3 years ago

      Yeah both parties suck. How can you be here so often and not get that that's the concensus?

      1. Inquisitive Squirrel   3 years ago (edited)

        Because he thinks his party is top notch and it’s only the evil Republicans/Libertarians that ruin everything. Thus, he believes that both Repubs and Libertarians suck, but Dems are the bees knees. He’s an unabashed tribalist.

  7. Utkonos   3 years ago

    BLAME CANADA!!!

    1. perlmonger   3 years ago

      Canada is full of white people...

      1. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

        They're working on that.

    2. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

      With all their beady little eyes, and their heads so full of lies.

      They’re not even a real country anyway!

    3. Libertariantranslator   3 years ago

      If Mises Caucus Trumpanzees like Daif Smif have any say, These United States would again have to invade Canada, arrest and try their entire government for not stripping pregnant females of self-ownership, personhood and individual rights to please GOPista televangelists eager to accuse women of aggression against non-individuals or even murder for desertion from the War against Race Suicide! From 1969 to 1973 Canada experienced a net influx of population while pro-life Nixon Christianofascism sought to exterminate life in Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. (bit.ly/3TOVzYn)

  8. MistyPowell   3 years ago (edited)

    I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless.

    Here’s what I've been doing..........>>> OnlineCareer1

  9. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    In politics-as-sportsball analogies, the GOP traded Tulsi Gabbard for Liz Cheney. Man, that was like the trade of the century.

    1. Stuck in California   3 years ago

      Looks like the Ds get just enough money out of the deal to fund No, No, Nanette. History is going to shine on that decision, I'm certain!

      1. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

        We traddd Cheney for a D with two D’s.

  10. IceTrey   3 years ago

    No, drug prohibition is primarily to blame for fentanyl inflows. This article is a waste of space. Let's stop fooling with the symptoms and treat the disease, government initiating force.

    1. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

      Recognizing that that isn't going to happen, let's try to suppress Fentanyl and save some lives.

      1. Verbum Vincet   3 years ago

        Carrie Nation said the same thing. Of course, we had (Constitutional) Prohibition until a few years later when we didn't.

        We've spent well over a trillion dollars over five decades 'suppressing' liberty and the Constitution at home and waging low-intensity, covert wars abroad. Over those same five decades, drug warriors have been *claiming* to 'suppress' the 'really bad' drugs. Yet, the drugs grow stronger and stronger and cheaper and cheaper due to the Iron Rule of Prohibition. 'Suppression' ain't working!

        But you're probably right: we'll have an unconstitutional Drug War as long as statists and busybodies can force someone else pay for their useless virtue signalling. Thankfully for drug warriors, the economy's never looked so good!

        1. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

          It isn’t unconstitutional to ban smuggling over our international borders.

  11. MLp   3 years ago

    Did you consider that the pressure on the Border Patrol over all given the enormous amount of illegal crossings affects the ability of the agents to adequately staff and conduct searches at the legal crossings. I am not anti immigration but if you are going to give the fentanyl influx a pass at least consider the overall implications of inadequately staffed border security.

    1. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

      The border security problem is largely caused by criminal organizations. Going on offense against the crime lords conducting the human and drug trafficking would be more effective than trying to secure the entire Mexican border.

      1. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

        We can multi task.

    2. Davedave   3 years ago

      Did you consider that if you stop ordering border patrollers to sweep water uphill with rakes, they might have time to concentrate on doing things that actually benefit the US instead of harming it?

  12. Longtobefree   3 years ago

    Unstated premise:
    Counting detected smuggling is the same as counting all smuggling.

    How does this alleged economist pretend she can count the unseen?

  13. weegmc   3 years ago

    There is a boatload of fentynal coming across the border every day. Via every conceivable form of transport. If one migrant is carrying, then we have a problem with all migrants because they allow for cover. The distribution plan was well documented in a book from several years ago, the premise is that primarily Mexican immigrants are the local distribution bosses, circulating in and out to avoid any unwanted attention/detection. To some degree immigrant (illegal?) communities in those area provide a degree of cover.

    1. Moderation4ever   3 years ago

      Are immigrants different from any other community that are isolated? If immigrants provide cover, it is because they really cannot go to the police. This is the idea of sanctuary, police and city officials are separated from ICE. We want immigrants talking to police and not afraid that conversation will alert them to ICE.

    2. Libertariantranslator   3 years ago

      When there were thimblefuls of LSD to be had, nobody could give away stupefacient narcotics and barbiturates. Let's look at harm reduction. In 55 years we've suffered zero addiction or deaths from marijuana or LSD overdoses. So percentage-wise, fentanyl deaths (X, no 2 pundits agree on how many) is to zero as illegal acid and weed deaths are to... um... er... what would Fiona say is the proper ratio?

      1. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

        Is there someone we can call for you Hank?

  14. Moderation4ever   3 years ago

    I appreciate Reason taking a realistic look at the border issues. I really have a hard time determining the actual size of the problem at the border. Republicans seem to blow it up and Democrats seem to ignore it. It is hard to say where the problem should rank in the scheme of all the problems.

    1. Inquisitive Squirrel   3 years ago

      It's definitely a subject that no one discusses rationally or honestly anymore.

    2. Libertariantranslator   3 years ago

      TR would say: "Illegal invaders? I'd crush them underfoot--then again, not so fast!" That sort of blather sufficed to baffle and please the yokels in 1903, when Imperial Chinese boycott's were interfering with exports. Today Grabbers of Pussy offer to crush, and German Democratic Republic Dems call for delays... while "we" continue to crush ALL remaining enterprise, production and trade in the banana republics from which economic refugees flee.

  15. CindyF   3 years ago

    So, fentanyl is being seized at manned border crossings which means that it not coming across the border at unmanned border crossings? Since no one is capturing those who bring drugs across the border at unmanned crossing sites, how would you know?

    This is some twisted logic.

    1. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

      A ‘manned’ border crossing?

      RACIST!!!!

    2. Davedave   3 years ago

      Cindy, if you ask someone to google 'adult education classes in my area' for you, you can sign up for some remedial reading lessons.

      1. CindyF   3 years ago

        FOAD!

    3. Truthteller1   3 years ago

      Fiona has the reasoning skills of a child.

  16. Tom Morrow   3 years ago

    I know, let's conveniently ignore that because of the tsunami of illegal alien parasites flooding over the border, Border Patrol is stretched extremely thin and unable to do a thorough job at any crossing. This is the problem with the infestation of parasites that Biden and the Democrats keep asking to illegally breach our borders.

  17. Truthteller1   3 years ago

    So the secure border seizes many times more fentanyl than the unsecured border, therefore we shouldn't worry about the unsecured border.

  18. Case57   3 years ago

    How can we know the quantity of drugs moved across the border when the sample is only what we have managed to interdict? Logically, I think this is a flawed argument because it can be argued we don't have a complete picture of where the quantities of drugs in circulation get into the country from.

    1. Libertariantranslator   3 years ago

      Very good observation. Pop quiz: what percentage of the U.S. economy did illegal alcoholic beverages comprise in 1932? At that time it was manifest beyond peradventure that the entire U.S. economy was collapsing... along with that of Germany. So... 0.00001%? 5%? 10%? Justify your answer.

  19. Juanita   3 years ago

    We need SEVERE penalties for importing fentanyl. Drug importers should get life in prison with no chance of parole. Only if we get STRICT enough can we win the drug war.

  20. Malik Ligao   3 years ago

    Thank you for sharing! Keep it up, Mike.

  21. bagoh2o   3 years ago

    Why would anyone expect the data on drug possession during illegal crossings to be comparable to those through a customs checkpoint? One involves no serious searching, and often the crossings are not even seen, let alone searched. Am I suppose to believe that, or that drug cartels would find entry though heavily searched customs to be preferable to just running across an open border? Which would you choose to send your valuable illicit cargo through? Common guys. This knee jerk response to say the opposite of whatever is in the media is just as mindless as automatically believing it.

  22. No One Of Consequence   3 years ago (edited)

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects a 'Very Narrow Approach' to Deadly Force by Police

Jacob Sullum | 5.20.2025 3:00 PM

3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans

Jeff Luse | 5.20.2025 1:37 PM

Serious Immigration Law Enforcement Means Serious Destruction to American Liberty

Brian Doherty | 5.20.2025 12:16 PM

Trump Says Birthright Citizenship Is Only 'About the Babies of Slaves.' Historical Evidence Says Otherwise.

Damon Root | 5.20.2025 11:38 AM

A Major Property Rights Case Idles on Supreme Court Docket

Christian Britschgi | 5.20.2025 11:12 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!