A North Carolina School District Wants To Ban 'Furry' Costumes
Despite acknowledging that "the costume issue is small," the Iredell-Statesville School Board is suggesting banning animal costumes in response to online rumors.

In one North Carolina school district, students may soon find an unusual new directive in their school's dress code policy: a ban on "furry" costumes.
Officials in the Iredell-Statesville School District, which serves a suburb of Charlotte, North Carolina, appear to be undertaking a strange response to a social media hoax. According to Queen City News, a local news station, the school district was recently inundated with emails alleging that students identifying as "furries" had been coming to schools dressed as animals and bringing litter boxes into school bathrooms. While officials determined that the reports were false, some school board members appear to believe there is some danger to the hoax. As a result, board members have proposed an amendment to the district dress code to officially bar students from wearing "furry" costumes to school, "including tails, gloves, ears, or collars."
However, the proposed amendment will likely act to stoke overblown culture war fears, not calm them. Not only is a ban on animal costumes an overzealous reaction to a nonexistent problem, but it will also ultimately give ammunition to feckless culture warriors looking for proof, however flimsily, that an internet rumor of wokeness gone awry is true.
Rumors of students identifying as "furries," or animals with a cartoonish animal alter-ego, and using litter boxes in school bathrooms began to circulate in late 2021, with the earliest acknowledgment of the phenomenon by a school district coming in October of that year. The hoax gained widespread traction in January 2022 after the Twitter account Libs of TikTok tweeted a video of a woman at a Michigan school board meeting who claimed that she "heard that at least one of our schools, in our town, has in one of the unisex bathrooms a litter box for the kids that identify as cats." The post received over 4,500 retweets and quote tweets and spurred national coverage of the hoax.
So far, all reports of schools providing litter boxes for "furry" students have proven to be false, but that hasn't kept officials at the Iredell-Statesville school district from falling prey to baseless panic, even if they acknowledge that the online claims aren't true.
During a recent school board meeting, Iredell-Statesville School District officials said that an unspecified TikTok video spurred rumors that the district was providing litter boxes for "furry" or otherwise animal-identifying students. Board members noted that these rumors, like other similar claims, are baseless. "The kitty litter boxes in the bathrooms, that's not happening," said Board Member Mark Page. "I'm so tired of hearing comments. It seems like it's at one and maybe two of our high schools that these kids are just starting this stuff up."
Despite acknowledging the hoax, the board introduced a proposed amendment to the district's dress code that would ban "a costume or part of a costume including tails, gloves, ears, or collars." The policy contains exceptions for spirit weeks or theatre productions. The new policy appears intended to quash rumors that the school district supports "furry" students by explicitly banning animal costumes. "We're trying to address it before it becomes a major problem," board member Bryan Shoemaker told Queen City News. The board will vote on the amendment next month.
Rather than prevent a "major problem," the district's response seems far more likely to add fuel to furry-rumor flames. After all, why would a school ban animal costumes if fursuit-wearing teenagers weren't rampant? As Page notes, "The costume issue is very small. It's just a small group of the kids that are jerking the chains of adults." However, by suggesting this policy change, it appears that Iredell-Statesville School District officials have allowed a small number of contrarian teenagers to grab their attention—and likely keep rumors about the scourge of "furries" in high schools alive.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I really don't see a problem with a school telling kids they can't dress as furries when they come to school. Moreover, if it is the case that children identifying as cats and demanding a litter box isn't happening, then why worry about it being banned?
School bans something utterly idiotic that thankfully doesn't happen anyway. I am not seeing the problem here.
Look at the bigger picture. Not only will this fuel paranoia (if it wasn't a problem, why are they banning it), it creates yet more opportunities for abusive intervention by administrators and school "resource" officers.
Halloween costumes, school mascots, an excessively "furry" scarf, many kinds of gloves popular with elementary school kids, animal-themed pajamas (yes, Pajama Day is a thing at many schools), every Goth anywhere who thinks that collars are "dark". All soon to be subject to discretionary enforcement under this utterly idiotic policy.
Good lord, aren't any of these school board members parents? The one thing you don't do when a kid is jerking your chain is to let him know that it worked.
First, you can't dress like a furry is not an idiotic policy. Schools should have dress codes. Second, how the hell is such a policy going to be abused? And if you ban it, then whenever someone says it's happening, you have an answer "it is banned". If you don't ban it, then you really can't say it isn't happening, can you? Not banning it is what fuels the allegations and rightfully so. My guess is that it is happening. If it were not, people like you wouldn't be so keen on keeping it from being banned.
We can't have a civilization with people who are so stupid they think schools telling their students "Don't dress like a furry" is a problem.
re: how is such a policy going to be abused?
The policy isn't "don't dress like a furry" - it's don't wear an animal costume or any part of an animal costume". I already rattled off a bunch of things that are or could be considered "part of an animal costume" yet are part of many non-furry students' daily attire.
Come on, you're here at Reason. I know you read the articles.
You think the kind of bonehead who'd try to arrest a seven year old for chewing a pop-tart or a six year old for making a finger-gun wouldn't be equally boneheaded with the power inherent in this kind of policy?
If you want to require uniforms, go ahead and do that. And if you've got an actual safety or educational reason for enforcing a dress code, do that too. But creating policies (and inviting enforcement) to solve a non-problem is actively counter-productive.
“Don’t dress like a furry” seems like vast over-kill for now.
HOWEVER... The way that things are going right now, we MAY need to pass a law that says "Do NOT burn accused witches, and do NOT burn people who reject the Lizard-People-stole-Trump's-election theories!"
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a (ad-07) lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
If boys can identify as girls and use the girl's facilities just on the verbal say that they identify as a girl, why can't a student identify as a cat?
"...why can’t a student identify as a cat?"
Because you would be engaging in "cultural appropriation", THAT'S why!!! Dennis Avner already did that before you, Johnny-Cum-Lately!!!
To see the results of “species change surgery” on people who are nominally human, but feel like cats, google “Dennis Avner” “Stalking Cat” … Search on images especially…
Stories like this are why I Don't Like Calling North Carolina Home. Don't let the video and happy song fool ya!
I Like Calling North Carolina Home (Song)--Covered by Sythe Cameron
https://youtu.be/PNjoukDEnf8
to be fair.... the kind of people getting worked up about furries are often the same people obsessed with late term abortions that nobody ever gets without a good medical reason.....
whether it is happening or not is not relevant to them.... they just want to force things on people whether it needs to be forced or not.
There is never a good reason to get a late term abortion. If the pregnancy has become a threat to the women's health late in the term, the safest way to end the pregnancy is by inducing labor.
The claim that there are medical reasons to have a late term abortion rather than inducing labor are lies.
actually.... pretty much all abortions that happen late term are due to fetal abnormalities that were not visible earlier...... the child will end up dead no matter what you do. (or, at best, languish through a handful of miserable years.)
the claim that there are no medical reasons for a late term abortion is what is the lie.
Your citation fell off.
Hard to cite feelz.
Preggers lady with late-term child is in a horrible car accident, broken hip and leg bones all around a baby with deadly wounds. You can’t save both the mom AND the child, and BIRTHING the dying child, through all those broken bones and torn flesh, will make an unholy mess, and likely speed the death of both mom and child. Pick one or the other to save.
These things happen from time to time! But self-righteous Nosenheimers and Buttinskies (unrelated to ANYONE involved) do LOVE to butt in, and PUNISH the “offenders”, because… Because it gets them off!!! Go figure!!!!
I have read of this, but will NOT provide a cite for you self-righteous assholes who will NEVER change your minds anyway! Perfect People and Perfect Assholes NEVER change their already-Perfect Minds!
sigh.... i often forget just how stupid you guys are..... you ACTUALLY believe that people get late term abortions just for fun. they go through all the strain and stress of pregnancy just to kill the fetus as close to birth as possible just for kicks.....
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10426234/
from that:
"However, because fetal prognosis is not always clear when a malformation is diagnosed, postponing the decision until fetal development allows more thorough evaluation and may avoid unnecessary termination of pregnancy in the second trimester. "
in other words..... a significant reason behind third trimester abortions is that the women and doctors are actively trying to avoid getting an abortion in the first place. they chose not to abort earlier because they were hoping to actually have the baby.
I suspect that you two are talking past each other because you haven't yet agreed to what counts as a "late term" abortion.
Some studies count "late term" as 'past the patient's due date' or > 41 weeks. But other studies consider "late term abortions" to be those 'between 17 and 20 weeks'.
That said, there are a number of "fetal conditions incompatible with life", some of which are sometimes only discovered very late in a pregnancy. Trisomy 18, for example (a genetic condition), is inevitably fatal. Anencephaly (a failure of brain development) is another such condition. In those scenarios, what is the ethical basis for justifying even a small risk to the mother's life during delivery?
"In those scenarios, what is the ethical basis for justifying even a small risk to the mother’s life during delivery?"
But self-righteous Nosenheimers and Buttinskies (unrelated to ANYONE involved) do LOVE to butt in, and PUNISH the “offenders”, because… Because it gets them off!!!
Shorter version: Because fuck you, that's why!
Not very ethical, but there it is...
you are correct that many people use many different distinctions for "late term." most official stuff i have seen is third trimester, but some focuses on that 1% that happens after 21 weeks.
from his comment, i surmise the underlying feeling he associates with the term is past the point of viability. (he wants to induce labor and so seems only to be considering life of the mother as a reason.) of course, that is a bad guideline to use, because the fetus is often NOT viable due to the abnormalities, some of which you list.
it is a similar problem to what you see with gun grabbers who have absolutely no understanding of guns at all. most of the people motivated to restrict abortions have a similar ignorance of what it is they are trying to restrict.
See https://www.newyorker.com/science/annals-of-medicine/what-the-life-of-the-mother-might-mean-in-a-post-roe-america What the “Life of the Mother” Might Mean in a Post-Roe America
“We are going to see more deaths and more injuries,” Ghazaleh Moayedi, an ob-gyn in Dallas, said. “I don’t have to speculate about that at all.” Also see https://www.wired.com/story/roe-fall-limit-screening-fatal-congenital-conditions/ “Roe’s Fall Will Limit Screening for Fatal Congenital Conditions”. Self-righteous anti-abortion fanatics may soon heap HUGE helpings of extra grief on parents who will be FORCED to have Mom carry a soon-dead to birth! Shall we ALSO rub Mom’s nose in her forced futile efforts, in the form of the dead baby? Would THAT help satisfy your punishment boners as well?
not only will you see some mothers forced to birth soon to be dead babies..... limiting the later term abortions will result in more of them not taking a chance when an abnormality is seen early. babies that might have had a better prognosis after another month or two of development are going to be aborted before that can happen. the limitations on abortion are going to increase abortions earlier on and overall.
See http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/#_Toc107315509 (Indexed Sub-section of web page =, "The Sociobiology of Abortion") for gory details that the Nosenheimers (AND Buttinskies) do NOT want to discuss honestly!!! "I am MUCH holier than YOU are!!! Now GO AWAY!!! Lest ye CONTAMINATE Mine Own Pure and Holy Self!"
Thank you, Dr. Cunningham.
I don't know. Banning Halloween costumes of animals seems rather overly broad. I don't know why schools need to do Halloween at all, but if they do, animal costumes seem like pretty standard fare. Now if it's some weird-ass sexualized animal Furry costume, that's another thing, but it's the sexualization, not the fur that's the problem there.
Or I guess this isn't really about Halloween. In that case, yeah, I don't think a dress code that says don't come to school in a costume is probably reasonable. The focus on furries is still kind of silly IMO.
There's an exception for "spirit weeks" (whatever those are) but none for Halloween, which is when students are most likely to dress up in costumes. Generalize the exception to include any occasions in which other types of fantasy costumes are allowed, and I guess there would be no real objection to such a rule, but it would still be utterly pointless and stupid.
It's been a long time since high school, but IIRC spirit week was the week before Homecoming (typically around Halloween), and students would decorate the halls and sometimes dress up for the theme of the halls and/or the mascot of the school. (For the Panthers you might see some cat ears, a painted nose, and whiskers)
"Utterly pointless and stupid" covers at least half of high school, IMHO.
Is this a free speech issue like throwing soup at a painting? Why is Emma Camp wasting time on this when Campbell's is still producing soup by the ton?
Poor Emma must draw the short straws to get all the crappy assignments.
Ultimately, furries are enough of a scourge that even if this is overwrought, it's still worth it. In fact, it may not be enough.
+1
But it’s ok if you dress like a prostitute.
don't talk like that about your mother.
I can’t help it if my moms hot.
is dad out of the picture, by chance?
Thermoregulation is difficult at 700 lbs.
What's the problem with uniforms? Seriously. I don't mean mandated furry costumes. Well, not at school anyway.
There are advantages and disadvantages to school uniforms. Here is one of many articles laying out the case both ways.
I think the argument comes out weakly against school uniforms. Many of their claimed advantages disappear when you look at actual data. For example, one of the big claims is that uniforms eliminate class and status distinctions. But affluent families can afford multiple uniforms while poor families can afford only one. The status distinctions reappear within as little as two months.
But reasonable people could look at the same data and disagree. It's a close case.
But reasonable people could look at the same data and disagree. It’s a close case.
Also useful to look at the dress code in a/the given context. You fubared the link but, almost certainly it's a case of 'school-provided plaid jumpers and ties vs. store-bought knee-length skirts and polos' and not 'provided plaid jumpers and ties vs. store-bought gorilla costumes and thongs and sports bras' and the up-shots, poor vs. wealthy cliques rather than blood colors vs. crip colors.
dang would have gone to school dressed as the phillie phanatic if I knew I could
I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless.
Here’s what I've been doing.........>>> OnlineCareer1
How about scaly costumes? Those kids that identify as dinosaurs and lizards.
https://i.imgur.com/dfdNWpL.jpg
I just wanted to link to this comic. My god. I had to sort through so much porn to get this... why did this happen?
Lol. That is great.
When can we expect furries to be placed on the LGBTQ2S+ flag?
Clear case of exclusion and bigotry on behalf of the q community.
What will they eventually add to the flag? I’m thinking a little teddy bear of fox with a tiny little flesh colored penis sticking out.
Maybe a brown strip of fur in that arrow formation that has almost eliminated the rainbow and will eventually. I think adding some 3d texture to the flag isn’t a bad idea.
Are furries not covered by the "+"? I thought that was a catchall, but I'm also not remotely interested in understanding how any of it works, so that may be on me.
So the + doesn't mean plus sized chubby lovers?
If the + was enough why did they add 2s to it? Whatever the hell that is.
"2S" is "Two-Spirit," a term used for Queer and Transgendered people among some Indigenous Tribes of North America, albeit with great controversy:
Two-Spirit--Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-spirit
You were curious enough to ask, not that there's anything wrong with that. 🙂
I love the tag that comes up if you hover over the image for this.
Part and parcel of Reason's descent. Scott Shackford, of all people, used to have epic alt-text.
The GOAT was Ed Kray Kray. But he left for some reason or another.
He'd be hated now, because he's reasonably liberal, but I liked him and I miss him.
Maybe this is all a scam by the animal rights groups to stealth ban fur coats?
I could see that. PETA freaks used to use magic markers to vandalize fur coats of rich people. If the PETA freaks did that with Pioneer and Frontier Mountain Men reinactors, they'd get their ass Bowie Knifed or shot. So maybe this is a safer way of achieving the same objective
Republicans can’t let facts get in the way of a culture war fight.
Or, you know, a modification to an already existing dress code is getting blown way out of proportion in an effort to catch Republicans pouncing.
Always fun watching people who actively engaged in the culture war starting to lose the culture war resort to mocking the other side for engaging in the culture war.
It's a lot like Russia now blaming Ukraine and the west for being terrorists and their belligerency.
The irony is beyond impressive.
You can't ban furry suits - how else are you going to know which kids needs to be set on fire?
So arson is better than playing dress-up?
I’m beginning to think that Furry costumes are less a sign of mental illness than a vector for spreading it to beholders. Must be that Psychotic Toxoplasmosis coming from cat shit they were talking about years ago. ?
What is Reason’s positions on litter boxes?
Are we going soft on self identification potties?
I hope they hit the box and not the floor! 🙂
"Everybody Go Pot-tay!". 🙂
I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless.
Here’s what I've been doing.........>>> OnlineCareer1
The solution os to ban the poetry of T.S.Eliot from the public schools, as their descent into the furry abyss began with the transformation his " Old Possum's Book of Cats " into the eponymous musical, whose costumed cast became role models for the minions of the Furrintern.
Blame Andrew Lloyd Weber for that bullshit and leave Elliot alone
"The Furrintern"? Is that like The Comintern? 😉
Not only is a ban on animal costumes an overzealous reaction to a nonexistent problem...
https://americanmind.org/salvo/thats-not-happening-and-its-good-that-it-is/
Which brings us to the Law of Salutary Contradiction, whose formulation is: “That’s not happening and it’s good that it is.” While the Law of Merited Impossibility applies to the future, this one is about the present. It’s what the ruling class immediately switches to after what they insisted would “never” happen is happening before everyone’s eyes.
Is the NSA spying on Tucker Carlson? That’s an insane conspiracy theory … which is also warranted by Tucker’s treasonous contacts with Russian officials as he seeks an interview with Putin.
Is the Biden Administration inviting in illegal immigrants, then putting them on military planes and shipping them to the heartland? Absolutely not … and these future Nobel Prize winners deserve their shot at the American Dream.
The coinage is Rod Dreher’s and goes back to the early debates on homosexual marriage. As Dreher formulates it, the Law of Merited Impossibility holds: “That will never happen, and when it does, boy will you [homophobes, transphobes, racists, sexists, whatever] deserve it.”
Its second purpose is to dismiss out of hand “slippery slope” arguments—despite, or because of, the fact that every single such argument over the last twenty years at least has proved true. Worried that allowing people to “self-identify” as whatever sex they want will lead to pervy 50-year-old men exposing themselves to’ tween girls? Insist, loudly and indignantly, that that will NEVER happen and anyone who suggests it might is an alarmist bigot with a heart full of hate.
The third purpose is to enforce the new caste system. Those who get to impose fresh irrational indignities on the rest of us are the upper caste. Those who object, or even have reservations, are lower. The latter are not allowed to harbor, much less express, any doubts. Whatever humiliation the upper caste has planned for us, we deserve and must meekly accept. Hence when said pervy 50-year-old actually does start waving around “her” equipment in the girls’ locker room, if any parent dares object, let ’em have it with both barrels. That thing that ten seconds ago you said would “never” happen? Now it’s righteous punishment for the retrograde.
"The coinage is Rod Dreher’s and goes back to the early debates on homosexual marriage. "
It goes back to Sigmund Freud and his famous story of the borrowed kettle. A man returns a borrowed kettle, and the owner sees that it's been damaged and complains. The borrower claims that he never borrowed that particular kettle. He then claims the kettle he returned was in pristine condition. Finally he claims that the kettle was already damaged when he borrowed it.
"The third purpose is to enforce the new caste system."
12 year olds dressed in furry costumes aren't in a position to enforce a 'new caste system.' Let's see in 20 years from now.
Rod Dreher needs to get back into his Benedictine Hobbit-Hole, take care his own marriage, and STFU about everybody else's.
I bet Sinclair Lewis never visualized Berzelius Windrip, the embodiment of American Fascism, as some Muppet rag-doll that Miss Piggy throws around the stage.
And boy, do you deserve it.
At this point, who gives a fuck? If any kid or adult wants to believe they are a different gender, species, race or from another planet, who cares? At the same time, there should be no bans on the use of any substance and the users should be free to consume wherever they please. Let people walk around naked too if they want. Don’t look if it bothers you, but please if you are doing any of these things, don’t come and tell me how being trans anything or a drug user, or nudist makes you a better person.
I'm old enough to remember when furries were just people at SF conventions who liked a particular category of costumes. Something like 15 or 20 years back though, they got overrun with perverts and nutjobs who would insist that they were in fact the animals that their costumes depicted, and they'd get really snotty with anyone who wouldn't play along.
-jcr
I'm in favor of school uniforms, but if the schools could get high school girls to wear clothing at all, that would be an improvement.
It is not about costumes per se, it is about the degradation of education. Wokeness and common core has lowered America's performance in the world, at a time when every other industrialized country is making great gains in their children's education.
Degradation of education, and ill add to that normalizing mental illness.
Much of what's wrong with the left is no one told them to sit down, shut the fuck up, and do what their told. They are the spoiled child who always got their way, and who's parents caved to every whim.
Take off the stupid costume, you aren't getting a litter box, and STFU do your math homework
Indeed. Can't parents just tell their kids "no"?
Not without permission from the authorities.
Furfaggotry is now, was always, and is only a sexual fetish. Full stop. There should be zero tolerance for expressing sexual fetishes, by any person, in public schools. Twelve-year-olds should not even *have* sexual fetishes. These children are all likely the victims of sexual child abuse.
My sons are 13 and 14 and they have to see this shit every day. It is disgusting, and as an atheist it makes me understand why our society needs God back in our lives. On the Day of the Rope you people will be asked how many genders there are. Your lives will hang in the balance on your response.
No one has ever worn an animal costume for other than sexual fetish reasons? I'm not sure I buy that.
Hell, Mother's Lament pointed out that Shaman Man on January 6th was a big walking advertisement for Furrydom! 🙂
I take it you give your kids copies of The Turner Diaries for literary entertainment huh?
Well that shit is way worse than a kid wearing a Unicorn ball cap and Furry UGG Boots!
And self-professed "Atheists" who say "We need God back in our lives" and "I send my kids to church so they learn values" are phonies by their own admission! I as an Atheist hold these phonies in greater contempt than the typical Holy Roller because such Atheists willfully help perpetuate the whole delusional racket of religion!
As for that "Day Of The Rope," you might want to save the rope for yourself. This is a nation of more guns than people and most of the people are just trying to get through a damn day!
Come to them with your nosey Queer queries after a couple hours in traffic, when they're tired and hungry, and it's after dark, they're not going to assume it's "Avon Calling!" Your rope and ass both might get shot!
Fuck Off, Nerdy Nazi!
My kid wore a cat ear headband and clip on tail for a couple of years in High School. The few people who noticed either didn't care, or thought it was cool. Eventually she outgrew it, as teenagers do.
The real issue is that Furries took an early stand against Nazis, which the right can't tolerate. That makes them natural enemies.
The proper response is the one Paula Abdul said with a cocked head to console a target for Simon Cowell on American Idol:
"That's very...creative!" 🙂
Any kid wearing a furry costume to school should be beat up. This isn't a schoolboard issue. Frankly, I'm disappointed in the lack of social ostracization.
“Frankly, I’m disappointed in the lack of social ostracization.”
Adults ostracizing children? What's wrong with good old fashioned grooming and sexual abuse? When you’re losing the culture wars, the answer is, as with any losing conflict, double down and escalate.
Children used to play cops and robbers, cowboys and indians, and often enough, dress appropriately. Now they’re taking on the identities of our animal friends. It will be interesting to see how early fads and fashions of today’s children play out in later life. Perhaps this close identification with animals will lead to increased tolerance for veganism and treasuring nature and the sacredness of life.
Sorry, Mtruman. Opposing a moral panic does not mean you get to recruit child rickshaw pullers!
Fuck Off, Watermelon Rickshaw Boy!
" Opposing a moral panic does not mean you get to recruit child rickshaw pullers!"
It seems you misunderstand the gist of my comment. Children aren't being recruited. They're leading the way. Young people have always been at the forefront of social and cultural change. And old folk have usually tried to stand in the way. There's a poem by that old rick shaw puller William Wordsworth:
My heart leaps up when I behold
A rainbow in the sky:
So was it when my life began;
So is it now I am a man;
So be it when I shall grow old,
Or let me die!
The Child is father of the Man;
And I could wish my days to be
Bound each to each by natural piety.
Well not even the kids who wear animal costumes are ready to give up on The Internal Combustion Engine which delivers their costumes or the petroleum plastics that are in their costumes in favor of rickshaws. And they'll see and delight in lots more rainbows with modern technology too.
Fuck Off, Watermelon Rickshaw Boy!
Young people lead the way on social and cultural change. They don't need to be recruited by old folks. The young are not set in their ways and don't fear change or have such a stake in maintaining the status quo, like your attachment to burning fossil fuels over electric alternatives.
"with modern technology too."
Exploiting energy from fossil fuels is hardly modern technology. It goes back to the 19th century, at least.
And what charges so-called "electric alternatives"? Generators powered by fossil fuels and nuclear energy.
Fuck Off, Dumbass Watermelon Rickshaw Boy!
Ostracize anyone you want, as in refuse to talk to or associate with anyone, but a presumed adult talking about beating up kids or encouraging kids to beat up kids might get that adult beat up or worse.
Sounds to me like you're teaching kids that it's morally right to resolve differences with violence. That's contributing to the criminal conduct of a minor, not to mention brazenly Anti-Libertarian.
Lots of parents might get a furry eyeball about that, and if Ossifer Friendly won't do anything about this contribbing adult, that furry eyeball of parents might be staring at a sight.
Start again.
When kids wear them they're just called animal costumes.
Why the fuck would you be allowed to go to school dressed as a furry in the first place? When I was in school girls weren’t allowed to wear spaghetti straps and boys couldn’t have their boxers hanging out, amongst other things. Dressing up like a ridiculous animal and distracting everyone else seems like something you shouldn’t be allowed to do. Am I supposed to be outraged?
However, by suggesting this policy change, it appears that Iredell-Statesville School District officials have allowed a small number of contrarian teenagers to grab their attention—and likely keep rumors about the scourge of "furries" in high schools alive.
So are there some kids wearing the shit or is it a rumor? Both can't be true and this is a self contradictory statement.
"Am I supposed to be outraged?"
Yes, and don't forget to click on the links.
Now, now! Sowell wouldn't be getting in a tizzy over hypotheticals. 🙂
I hope the students at these schools start sneaking litter boxes into faculty restrooms.
How is it possible that the people who take ever fucking internet meme as the latest real-world crisis haven't died of old age yet?
I maintain that the reason Republicans are banning actual books is because they simply haven't discovered what's on the internet beyond their Facebook feed.
Wait until they discover all the porn. Just you wait and see what they do to your porn.
Do you really want to send your children to schools with such idiotic leadership? School choice NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Furries are not sexual, says the sexually dysfunctional writers of Vox. Phew. Glad that's sorted. /s