An Officer Hogtied and Tased an Autistic Child. Why Is He Still Allowed To Work as a Cop?
The Kansas credentialing body reprimanded the officer for using excessive force against a child, but stopped short of pulling his license.

A Kansas sheriff's deputy reportedly "used excessive force multiple times" on a child with special needs, according to an order of reprimand from the Kansas Commission on Peace Officers' Standards and Training (CPOST), the state's law enforcement credentialing body that issues licenses to peace officers. Eight months later, he still has his license.
The incident involves Matthew Honas, who was employed by the Jackson County Sheriff's Office from August 2006 to March of this year. On February 23, Honas responded to a call regarding an autistic 12-year-old runaway foster child, identified only as L.H. The order indicates that Honas "had dealt with L.H. in the past and was aware that he is autistic." In fact, Honas "had a physical struggle with L.H. prior to February 23, but there was no report or body camera footage of the prior event." Honas also did not wear his body camera on February 23, though his dashcam was recording during the interaction.
During the encounter, Honas "shoved [and] elbowed" L.H. He put the boy in the back of his patrol car "hog tied," meaning he was handcuffed behind the back, his ankles were shackled, and his handcuffs were connected to the ankle shackles. As L.H. sat in the car, restrained and "not actively resisting," Honas pushed pressure points on the boy's jaw, with no direction given for why he was doing it. Minutes later, as L.H. still sat in the car, Honas "deployed his taser," even though L.H. "was not a threat to [Honas] or other officers."
The order calls Honas' actions "punitive in nature," citing his threatening language. At one point, he told L.H., "here's the deal, you do anything you're not supposed to do I will tase you again." He also refused assistance from other officers and did not use any "de-escalation techniques."
According to The Kansas City Star, Honas was fired in March for the use of excessive force. But in its order of reprimand, CPOST stopped short of revoking his certifications. The board contends that he is not currently employed in Kansas law enforcement, but by leaving his license in place, he remains free to work as an officer of the law if he so chooses.
Honas' actions fit multiple worrying trends of police using excessive force, especially against children and people with special needs.
Police in Rochester, New York, responded to a 9-year-old girl having a mental health crisis. As she cried hysterically, police handcuffed and pepper-sprayed her, saying, "you did it to yourself, hon" when she asked them to stop. Similarly, while the presence of resource officers is intended to prevent or mitigate school shootings, they mostly just lead to more kids being suspended, expelled, and arrested. In one example in North Carolina, a resource officer handcuffed a 7-year-old autistic boy behind his back and pinned him face-down on the ground for nearly 40 minutes while taunting him.
In 2021, the Marshall Project determined that over the previous decade, 23 people died after being hogtied by police. Of those, 13 were "mentally ill or in mental crises."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In one example in North Carolina, a resource officer handcuffed a 7-year-old autistic boy behind his back and pinned him face-down on the ground for nearly 40 minutes while taunting him.
In other words cops are merely continuing to do the same things they did while they were in school.
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [res-08] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. Thank goodness, [rea-04] I found this employment online and I was able Hab to start working from home right away. This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://jobopportunity22.blogspot.com
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, i’m now creating over $35500 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! i do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28500 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link-------------------->>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
The Kansas credentialing body reprimanded the officer for using excessive force against a child, but stopped short of pulling his license.
Professional licensing is bullshit, man.
Just as there is a difference between private and public sector unions, there is a difference between private and public sector licensing.
Unions are acceptable in the private sector, but they embolden government parasites in the public sector.
Likewise professional licenses will always be abused in the private sector, but are completely necessary in the public sector.
You know I'm only joking. I saw the 'pull his license' comment on reason and it was just too big a target to let go.
I think it’s worth having a serious conversation. We talk about police reform in the form of QI and requiring insurance, but licensing is rarely discussed. Why not? You need a license to cut people open or represent people in court, but most places do not require a license to legally use coercion and violence. What's up with that?
1. No, you don't think that.
2. No, you don't think, period.
3. You are incapable of that.
Hey, I've got an idea. Why don't you ignore what I say and instead talk about me personally so you can raise your status among the loser trolls you consider to be your peers?
Whoops! You beat me to it.
I acknowledge your agency, assume you're lobbing a straight man softball of your own free will, answer back the only way possible, and you object?
I say "Let's have a conversation about xyz."
Your response "You, you, you, you, you nya nya nanny nanny boo boo!"
Sometimes I think you're a pathetic excuse for a human being who can only feel happiness while being mean to other people. Not that that's something to be ashamed of. Seems to be the norm around here.
We agree on this.
In one example in North Carolina, a resource officer handcuffed a 7-year-old autistic boy behind his back and pinned him face-down on the ground for nearly 40 minutes while taunting him.
The 'school resource officer' makes me think of the cop that... no other cop respects or wants to work with getting funneled into that duty because Union rules don't allow him to just be fired.
And then the school ends up using them for dealing with student discipline.
If it was my decision, it would be made clear that they are just there as security guards to protect against external threats. They would be explicitly prohibited from getting involved in student discipline issues (and can be fired if they do get involved).
School resource officers are the best of the best, haven't you seen the documentary "kindergarten cop"?
Who knows? Maybe he said ok I will accept the firing and won’t sue but only if you leave my license in place. Just because a small town has a winning case, doesn’t mean they have the budget and means to ‘win’ it. I just wish there was some ‘database’ that can be accessed if this sociopath tries to work as a cop someplace else and fails to mention where he worked before.
I met some kids in my time (and may have been one at one time) who really needed hog tieing. Just sayin'
And tasing while hogtied?
No. But seriously, I have been in situations with minor children under my supervision where the only way to control them/keep them under control was soft restraint by putting my weight on them and holding down their limbs. for a long time for them to settle down/and to show them that they were not in charge. Remember SOFT. And this was to protect them from hurting themselves or others. I am fairly sure most cops don't have that patience to not raise the level of violence.
Nowadays they call it putting a child into a restraint. One person might give a bear hug from behind, while two might put weight on limbs.
Hogtying a child? That's just a cop exercising dominance like an animal.
"Autistic" has been overly used to describe children who just behave badly.
And "mental health crisis" is basically a temper tantrum
Not saying they deserve what happen to them, but society has encourage dchildren (and police) to behave badly and this is what happens when they collide
Autistic children are encouraged to behave badly? Do they teach that in Autism School? Or is it learned on the streets, while hanging around with their hoodlum fellow autistics? Asking for an autistic friend.
I absolutely agree. People get extremely offended if you say it, but I think it’s a convenient excuse for a lot of parents with badly behaved and poorly disciplined brats.
My mom’s bestfriend’s son was born with fragile X syndrome and will never be capable of living completely independent (his IQ is below 70), but he still has to learn how to do everyday things and most of all how to behave and respect others. The friend’s son is an adult now, 21, but he is 6’4” and almost 300 lbs so he has the potential to be a major threat to anyone smaller than him if his behavior was not under control (which is WHY discipline should be equally important for parents of special needs AND non-special needs kids).
It seems like a lot of parents use their child’s special needs as an excuse to not discipline or hold their child to a minimum standard of behavior. It’s something that needs to be said because these special needs children will become adults one day and the parents won’t be around forever. Who would want to care for an abusive autistic adult once the parents can no longer manage or die?
Everyone knows autistic children grow up to be libertarians, so fuck em.
Why is the nazi thug allowed to continue working? What do you mean--he is doing precisely what he is being paid to do. Never forget that cops are just the other side of the BLM/Antifa coin--violent, very low-IQ over-compensating thugs who will gleefully shoot anyone their paymasters tell them to---and their dogs. Those that get off on abusing or killing the weak and innocent are quite correctly judged as being particularly well-suited for police work.
The only differences between the cops and the "crooks" are badges and immunity.
Seeing as blm and antifa don't get charged I would say the only difference is the badge
NAMBLANTIFA
I think what's missing here is does this qualify as criminal assault. If this guy was a private citizen without a state issued costume I think it would. Put him in front of a jury. Guilty or not guilty. Can a convicted felon hold a license in Kansas? Problem solved.
The whole point of licensing is:
1) To determined that you have been trained by a recognized training entity, and therefore and claims of ‘I didn’t know I couldn’t hogtie and tase somebody’ are automatically bullshit.
2) Maintain a national database with a unique identifier so that when you fuck up, you can be fired and barred from participating in that profession ever again.
How does an entire country do police licensing wrong ? If I ever intentionally harmed a patient, I’d be out of a job, blacklisted, and never allowed in the nursing field ever again.
Reprimand ? Would you get a reprimand for doing this? This man needs far more than to lose a license, this requires serious jail time. Until we have a national license they mean nothing.
I like the idea of national licenses until I think about it.
An Officer Hogtied and Tased an Autistic Child. Why Is He Still Allowed To Work as a Cop?
Because the rodeo didn't hire him?
Because his union dues are paid up?
Torturing a child should be punishable by woodchipper.
-jcr
Simple. He is still allowed to be a cop because this poor kid is a foster child and doesn't have parents to sue the crap out of the system that licences the police
He's still a cop because his gang-buddies didn't prosecute him for his obviously vile crimes, despite him being caught red-handed. Sack the lot of them.