The Feminist Dystopia Don't Worry Darling Isn't a Big Idea Movie. It's a Dumb Idea Movie.
A wannabe prestige picture that works better as a pulpy mind-trip.

If you have heard anything about Don't Worry Darling, it's probably behind-the-scenes gossip about the movie's stars, Florence Pugh, Harry Styles, and Chris Pine, plus director Olivia Wilde, and their off-screen spats (and spits?).
It's rarely a great sign when the drama behind the camera overtakes the drama in front, especially with a would-be prestige picture like this one. Don't Worry Darling was positioned as the start to Hollywood's annual awards race, the late-year flood of cold weather Oscar hopefuls with Something Important To Say.
In theory, this was a movie with big ideas and big ambitions, with an up-and-coming female director working on a bigger canvas for the first time, and a screenplay drawn from the Black List, a collection of unproduced scripts highly praised by Tinseltown insiders.
Alas, Don't Worry Darling flubs its main ideas. This twisty period thriller is heavily influenced by The Truman Show and The Stepford Wives, but the inevitable Big Twist, which I won't spoil here, is both laboriously delivered and incredibly underdeveloped, leaving far too many unanswered questions. Yet I couldn't help but enjoy it anyway, not for its thematic ambitions, but as a pulpy contemporary update of The Twilight Zone—or, perhaps, Black Mirror with a much bigger budget. It's not a good movie, exactly, but it's often an entertaining one.
The story follows Alice Chambers (Pugh), a housewife living an idyllic life in a picture-perfect midcentury modern community somewhere in the desert. Alice is married to Jack (Styles, in a sort of glum Sinatra mode), who she treats every night with scotch and steak. They have it all—and so do the other similarly comfortable couples around them. They're living the American Dream, postwar style, with housewives and homeownership, beautiful lawns and immaculate glassware.
Inevitably, there are questions and complications. For one, the men all work together in a hidden underground facility on something called the Victory Project, and the only thing they can say about their jobs is that they're working on developing "progressive materials." There are ominous earthquakes that rumble the town. And the town, well, where exactly is it supposed to be? There are precious few references to the outside world, and those that exist seem to have been drawn from suspicious shared scripts. Except when the men go to work, no one is allowed to leave.
All of this is overseen by Frank (a swanky, villainous Chris Pine), the Victory Project's dashing leader, who is constantly delivering vaguely menacing inspirational monologues about how the men are involved in an important project that will change the world.
There's something cultlike about the whole project, something stultifying about its midcentury fantasy of male breadwinners and happy middle-class homes, and inevitably it all comes crashing down in a ludicrous twist that transforms the subtext into text while raising as many plot questions as it resolves.
Despite the plot problems, there's something enjoyable about watching it all play out, simply because it's so lavishly crafted and executed. Katie Byron's period production design is immaculate, and cinematographer Matthew Libatique imbues every image with a lush and golden glow that sells the midcentury fantasia. Pine makes the most of studiously vague dialogue, and Styles' turn as a sort of Rat Pack sad-sack works better than it should.
As director, meanwhile, Wilde isn't afraid to make bold stylistic choices, pumping up the soundtrack at times, setting up strange and memorable visuals, and intercutting Alice's dull domesticity with hallucinatory visions. Don't Worry Darling is rather clunky at the story level, but it's often effective at capturing mood, tone, and state of mind.
It's Pugh, however, who holds the movie together. Even with an underwritten role that tends to muddle her motivations, she's utterly magnetic, and one of the most promising performers working today. She comes close to turning this pulpy, preposterous movie into the scathing sci-fi think piece it so clearly yearns to be.
Ultimately, though, this isn't a Big Idea movie, it's a Dumb Idea movie. It yearns to say something important about the state of contemporary womanhood, the way that domesticity traps women, the male desire for female subservience, the pathetic character of modern men, and the rest of the Betty Friedan catalog of complaints. But its thematic ambitions end up tripping over its desire to package all of this into an accessible high-concept genre piece; rather ironically, Darling's ideas are undercut by its desire to please.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Rule 1 of The New Normal of Cinema: You need to explain where to find this movie. Prime? Theaters? Netflix?
So we know what to avoid?
Sad to say, but yeah.
Although it is nice to see that there is a film offering that isn't comic books. I haven't been to a theater in over a decade and don't feel like I've missed anything, as it's all superheros and remakes.
Comic book movies are better than half the drivel that Hollywood pumps out year after year.
Yes I’m still bitter about that dumpster fire of an Oscar winner Crash.
The Oscars and SAG are shit; they have been reduced to awarding woke.
I work from home providing various internet services for an hourly rate of $80 USD. I never thought it would be possible, but my trustworthy friend persuaded (amu-08) me to take the opportunity after telling me how she quickly earned 13,000 dollars in just four weeks while working on the greatest project. Go to this article for more information.
…..
——————————>>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
I'm looking forward to the Director's Cut edition of Rust.
That'll hit the top of the marquee the moment it's released. Number one with a bullet. But I'm afraid, regardless of that quick draw, there's been too much bad press, so it'll never get its shot in theaters.
> Comic book movies are better than half the drivel that Hollywood pumps out year after year.
That's not making me feel any more like I've missed anything.
Honestly, the original impetus was the theatergoing experience. Constant blue lights, people talking, people bringing babies to loud movies and when you complain that they cry every time there's a fight scene YOU are the asshole.
And, on the topic of loud, I am careful of my hearing as a musician who has spent a lot of time in loud environments (Pilot, woodworker, etc). Movies locally were played way too loudly. Especially during the 20 minutes of commercials at the beginning before the actual movie started.
But, then, it was all comic books. I don't like comic books. I didn't like them as a kid. I'm not your demographic. So, even if I was less grouchy about paying money and having to watch 20 minutes of commercials before the actual movie, or all the assholes on their cellphones, well... all there was were heavy CGI movies, censored by China, and generic to make them easy to translate for overseas distribution.
Woke just makes unappealing to me worse. But I had outgrown movies even before the wokes got their camel nose under the hollywood tent.
I saw Dog in theaters. It was enjoyable enough. I like dogs.
This is changing, but comic-book movies *used* to be a welcome promotion of values like heroism and protecting the weak. Now it's about protecting the woke.
Oh hon, you found this website and figured out how to post a comment, so you can work that newfangled thing called "Google".
>>laboriously delivered and incredibly underdeveloped
no Zone was these things.
Was this the move whose villain was modeled after Jordan Peterson?
All of this is overseen by Frank (a swanky, villainous Chris Pine), the Victory Project's dashing leader, who is constantly delivering vaguely menacing inspirational monologues about how the men are involved in an important project that will change the world.
Yep, pretty sure this is the one.
Yep. And Peterson’s reply of “[sic] Well, I hope they get my wardrobe right.” was fan-freaking-tastic.
Really? Yeah, that's pretty awesome. I didn't even know if Peterson had responded to the movie. I figured he'd have something pithy to say.
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/jordan-peterson-olivia-wilde-dont-worry-darling-b2159739.html
So I assume this means Wilde is finished making bank off her full frontal nudity scenes?
She's aging in dog years now, so probably.
Is this the same Olivia Wilde who was buddies with Harvey Weinstein, knowing full well the "open secret" of Weinstein's behavior toward women?
That's a curious bit of strawmanning on incels.
Seems there's a lot of projection of her own values and views, but not a lot of empathy. Like the comment about "believe they are entitled to sex from women."
Let's take this the other way. This is the reversal of the feminist ideal of wanting equality in the formerly male world. They come to the office, find out it's a competitive place, find out that better looking men often out earn, find out that salesmen out earn and that networking and camaraderie mean a lot.
Then they demand that they get equal pay, but don't negotiate for it. They complain about the boy's club, but then want to change how the club works. They complain when men talk frankly about women when they're not invited to lunch, but then bitch when they're not invited to lunch and so aren't able to network at the office. And on and on.
Basically, women demand entry to this world, a world that grew organically over generations, and then don't like it. And they are impatient, can't imagine organically changing the world by their positive presence. Instead they not only demand entry but demand it be changed to favor them. They feel entitled to this, not because they sell better, negotiate better, do better work, network better, have more pertinent experience, but because they are women. They are ENTITLED to equal positions, everywhere.
Fuck, people. Have a little empathy and maybe you can write something that isn't preachy and stilted.
Here's a better story. I'll remove the sexuality and make it self deprecating: I have been broke much of my life. Worked hard but ran into hard times as well.
I want millions of dollars. I'm really annoyed when I'm broke and sometimes I complain, pining for a day when I'm financially secure enough to tell my boss "fuck you" when he's a dick.
I don't think I'm entitled to millions, but I can get a bit envious of people who have it, especially ones who got it easily. Because I'm human and I have desires and frustrations like all normal humans, especially when I'm not succeeding where I really want to.
That's a subtext for a story people can relate to. Even if it's about a job you didn't get that you really wanted, or girls who reject you even though you have the desires almost everyone has, struggling with want and deprivation is the human saga. Some people go wrong and lash out, others eventually triumph, most of us just soldier on and keep trying.
But, nope. Not in modern hollywood. That shit won't sell to the studio bosses.
Wokeness is a product of capitalism. It's a consumerist view of society; society is a product, and the woke want the product to exactly match their personal specifications or they complain. Victim hierarchies are antithetical to any authentically revolutionary impulse; the moment "We're oppressed by capitalism" became "Some of us are *more* oppressed by capitalism than others," capitalism (at least the highly leveraged, fascistic variety we currently enjoy) won. The strange thing is that although wokeness perfectly exemplifies the capitalistic creation and exploitation of markets, it's not actually conducive to profit because the woke don't pay. Woke Hollywood product is basically just a way for narcissistic insiders to pretend to be smart.
Wokeness is a product of capitalism.
A commie propaganda op is a product of capitalism?
Get your meds adjusted.
-jcr
“who believe they are entitled…. They believe that society has now robbed them”
I wonder where anyone could get such crazy idea?
A hollywood bubblehead twat calling Peterson a pseudo-intellectual is like Kim Jong-Un calling you a fatass.
-jcr
Ultimately, though, this isn't a Big Idea movie, it's a Dumb Idea movie. It yearns to say something important about the state of contemporary womanhood, the way that domesticity traps women, the male desire for female subservience, the pathetic character of modern men, and the rest of the Betty Friedan catalog of complaints.
Hard pass.
Agreed. Also love the multiple points where Suderman talks about how bad the story is, how characters are muddled, etc. but follows with up how much he still liked the move cuz it looked pretty. I wonder if he would drink a shitty tasting cocktail if it simply looked pretty?
Depends on who one wants to impress at the cocktail party.
But it’s directed by a GIRLBOSS! This movie isn’t for you, but if you don’t want to support a movie directed by a GIRLBOSS, you’re an incel misogynist!
My favorite incel-insult fail came when they tried to give Ben Shapiro that label–a guy who’s been married for nearly 15 years and is a father of three.
I like the full-turn irony of
feministsfemale chauvinists strictly judging the value of a man's worth by the number of faceless sex objects he's bagged. As WuzYoungOnceToo points out "Say what you will about Harvey Weinstein, at least he wasn't an incel!"Daaaaaayum.
Wasn't the reason he was such a sexual predator was because he's got a fucked-up pecker (plus the fact that, as a studio boss with MASSIVE pull, he basically had control over these womens' careers)?
Also, when will they ever stop making commentaries of "modern" relations between men and women by drawing from caricatures of relations between men and women 70+ years ago?
...and I'm not so sure about 70 years ago.
Well, the Happy Days version of the 50s is what lots of people think it was really like.
So, maybe their myopic idea of what it was like 70 years ago?
Likely never. In feminist 'conventional wisdom,' men apparently live in some sort of culture based on the 1950s. Feminist 'conventional wisdom' is based on many assumptions and assertions that have no relation to facts or reality.
This one wasn't even on my list of movies to avoid yet.
It yearns to say something important about the state of contemporary womanhood, the way that domesticity traps women, the male desire for female subservience, the pathetic character of modern men, and the rest of the Betty Friedan catalog of complaints.
Meanwhile, normies happily go about their lives.
*barf*
Sounds like yet another Handmaid's Tale guaranteed to create outrage.
Will this be coming out BEFORE the midterms, by chance?
It yearns to say something important about the state of contemporary womanhood, the way that domesticity traps women, the male desire for female subservience, the pathetic character of modern men, and the rest of the Betty Friedan catalog of complaints.
Is there any modern movie made that is set in the 1950s that doesn't have this as a theme?
IMDB doesn’t have very many recent movies about the 50s listed, but there’s a 2011 film about J. Edgar Hoover. That movie probably doesn't have a lot of women trapped in domesticity.
I love the complaints about the fifties not being all "Ozzie and Harriet". Harriet Nelson was a working woman and had been since her band singer days. All the women playing housewives were working women, and one, Lucille Ball, was the head of a major TV studio.
What's wrong with female subservience? The female as the penetrated must literally submit herself to the male the penetrator for the species to survive. It's biology.
Piercing statement.
Certainly does drive the point home.
Daaaaammn!
I'd love to see you say that in a room full of feminazis just to watch the steam come out of their ears.
-jcr
Misandry is not the answer.
something stultifying about its midcentury fantasy of male breadwinners and happy middle-class homes
Hollywood and the left have been relentlessly demonizing normal, middle class life for the better part of a century. It wasn't stultifying, it was great, and they hated it. They've all but succeeded in their war against it.
I knew this would be crap when I heard about the girl boss director smearing Jordan Peterson for attention.
-jcr