The Education Department Asked for Public Comments on Sex Discrimination. It Got an Earful About Trans Athletes Instead.
Of the over 84,000 public comments available on the proposed Title IX regulations, a third included references to both “sex” and “sports.”

The public comment period for Education Secretary Miguel Cardona's proposed changes to official Title IX regulations ended in August. The Education Department received over 210,000 comments, with around 40 percent of those comments available on a public database.
In June, the department released over 700 pages of proposed regulations. The two most controversial provisions—a reversal of many of the due process protections for accused students during Title IX investigations and a redefinition of "sex discrimination" to include discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity—ignited a flurry of both criticism and praise from media commentators. It is unclear when official rules will be released or by how much, if at all, the proposed regulations will differ from the final rules.
While the comment period is theoretically meant to guide regulators' decisions and provide feedback on their rules, a large portion of the public comments appears to be expressing consternation over a subject irrelevant to this most recent spate of Title IX rules: transgender athletes in women's sports.
Cardona's proposed regulations purposefully left out specific rules surrounding transgender athletes, instead electing to "engage in a separate rulemaking to address Title IX's application to athletics."
Under the new rules, the Department of Education would understand "sex discrimination [as including] discrimination on the basis of . . . sexual orientation, and gender identity," The proposed regulations would also bar schools from "adopting a policy or engaging in a practice that prevents a person from participating in an education program or activity consistent with their gender identity." While these proposed regulations would likely apply to other sex-segregated facilities in schools, such as bathrooms and locker rooms, the department has explicitly waited to announce how they would apply to sports.
(There is also reason to believe there will be a legal fight before the proposed regulations could even be enforced in some states. In July, a federal judge placed a preliminary injunction against the new definition of sex discrimination, arguing that it directly conflicts with existing laws in 20 states.)
Despite this, of the 88,000 comments available on the regulations.gov website on September 23, a significant portion appeared to be, at least in part, expressing concern about transgender athletes. For example, the terms "gender" and "sports" appeared in 28,301 comments. "Sex" and "sports" appeared in a similar 28,646 comments. The term "sports" alone appeared in 37,777 comments.
One common comment—presumably a sample letter provided by an organization, though I wasn't able to determine which one—read, "This proposed rule forces girls to give up their educational opportunities to males who perform better than they do." While it doesn't explicitly mention sports, this comment clearly seems to refer to the concern that trans women athletes will take sports scholarships or places on teams from female athletes.
In contrast, search terms relevant to due process concerns for students accused of sexual assault and other violations were far less common. The term "due process" gained 3,032 hits, and forms of "accuse" (other forms of the word, like "accuser" and "accusation," were included in the search) appeared in only 2,796 comments. The term "victim" appeared in 2,422 comments.
The intensity of the attention focused on transgender athletes, even as the subject has only tangential relation to the current regulations up for debate, indicates that public concern over the issue isn't going away anytime soon. The public comments submitted on Cardona's proposed Title IX regulations show how desperately comprehensive rules for transgender athletes are needed. In particular, we need a rule that recognizes that both women and transgender women are protected classes—both have liberties that need to be preserved.
However, the degree to which the subject has captured public attention will make it difficult to develop sensible policy. Good, minimally invasive policy is rarely compatible with a culture war.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Maybe the general public thinks it's a bigger deal than the Department of Education does. If only they answered to the people.
I didn't respond but if I did:
1. Your department should be shut down
2. Biology should determine bathrooms and sports teams
3. Leave kids alone with the trannie crap. Schools other than teaching sexual reproduction should not be involved in kids personal decisions on their sexual preference and if in some rare cases are confused about their biology.
"It’s bad enough that the new regulations conflict with free speech, parental rights, biological reality, and women’s rights. But that they do so in flagrant contradiction of democratically decided state and federal laws and policies makes them even more egregious. Eighteen states and counting now have laws protecting women’s sports. Some states, such as Florida, have passed bills protecting parental rights in education. Yesterday, we commended Governor Glenn Youngkin for renewing Virginia’s commitment to transparency in schools.
The Biden administration is trying to create a “living Title IX” very much like the “living Constitution,” one whose meaning changes to subvert its original meaning. It should be firmly resisted." - National Review.
Just as the courts ruled that the 1964 Civil Rights Act applies to gay and transgender people. They were not in the act because no one in Congress in 1964 knew there were such things as gay people or crossdressers or they would have surely added them. So naturally, the courts had to alter the act instead of having Congress amend it.
Gorsuchs worst ruling was playing lawyer games to weasel gay rights into laws defined by sex. To wrap sexual preferences into laws to allow sex based equality was a mistake. Hopefully Gorsuch learned his lesson on that front. Don't weasel new laws into old laws with legal trickery.
His worst ruling was entitling states to tax interstate sales. It's not only the liberals who disregard the constitution.
That logic follows. I mean, I didn't know there were 27 genders until recently. So every time someone identifies as something new, the courts can say "Yes, Pansexual Foxkin" count as a protected class, too.
Sex-segregated sports do not discriminate against transgender athletes.
They discriminate against guys who suck at sports.
Or who just suck?
Michael Bolton hardest hit.
At least he's got a sense of humor.
Well, if you do not accept that physiological sex differences mean anything with regards to sports, I can see why one would think sex segregation discriminates against transgenders. I just do not see how one denies there are physiological differences between the sexes and not come off as a gibbering idiot.
Well, if you do not accept that physiological sex differences mean anything with regards to sports, I can see why one would think sex segregation discriminates against transgenders.
I don't agree to this first point. It's an assumption from a false proposition. If you don't believe in a distinction between the sexes, then it doesn't matter which division you get put in. It's like saying separating javelin throwers by handedness discriminates against the ambidextrous or arguing that the 50th best male poker player should be allowed to play against women. If you take the 201st-ranked man and put him in the women's division, he's still only the 201st athlete even if he beats all the women. The only way he winds up 1st is if you assume there's a physiological sex difference with regard to sport.
Trans"genders" is a preference not a biology. Sports organization is based on biology...male and female. As are public bathrooms.
Is this like when Obama asked for questions and then laughed off the #1 question about legalizing MJ?
Thank god the adults are back in the room.
I remember that.
The sports aspect of this is the most visible and obviously unfair to women portion of this issue, of course it was going to get more visibility than the kangeroo courts. Katherine Mangu-Ward on Jonah Goldberg's podcast a few weeks ago discussed this issue and expressed that because she has limited interest in sports. I realize that the Reason staff are drawn from the AV Club and student newspaper geeks who tend to hold athletics in contempt, but perhaps there can be some attempt at empathy?
Empathy from self absorbed pampered morons like Mangu-Ward? Dream on.
Goldberg and Mangu Ward must have been quite a vortex of mediocrity and smugness.
Your point being that they outshine Sullum and Suderman?
Perhaps the federal government should get its fingers out of everybodies pie and let each school decide what is best for them.
Start with overthrowing Wickard v. Filburn?
It's the only way legislation will be returned to the purview of Congress and not the morass* of government agencies
https://cei.org/blog/nobody-knows-how-many-federal-agencies-exist/
So it looks like, as usual, the federal government has got everything under control.
It Got an Earful About Trans Athletes Instead.
An *ear*ful? What are you, a biologist?
Better than a rear full.
That would have been a buttload of comments.
Emma believes that rules against gender discrimination aren’t relevant to women’s sports?
What rock does she live under?
It's a rock that identifies as a 3 bedroom condo overlooking Central Park West.
That's where Bubba and the Nazi live.
Sounds like a bad 1980s radio morning team.
Glad I wasn’t the only one that noticed the massive conflicting statements in the article.
Proposed regulation of “…a redefinition of “sex discrimination” to include discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity”
AND
“a large portion of the public comments appears to be expressing consternation over a subject irrelevant to this most recent spate of Title IX rules: transgender athletes in women’s sports.”
Does Emma really not understand how the new rules could easily be written, such that blocking any male that “gender identifies” as female from women’s sports could be construed as “discrimination” under Title IX?
"This proposed rule forces girls to give up their educational opportunities to males who perform better than they do." While it doesn't explicitly mention sports, this comment clearly seems to refer to the concern that trans women athletes will take sports scholarships or places on teams from female athletes.
*Squints* Can't tell if written by woman or man pretending to be a woman.
"While these proposed regulations would likely apply to other sex-segregated facilities in schools, such as bathrooms and locker rooms, the department has explicitly waited to announce how they would apply to sports."
Yeah, why doesn't the benighted public hold off on commenting? I mean, they're not proposing to put men into women's sports, they're simply softening things up to make it easier to put men into women's sports.
The proposed rule does not explicitly exclude sports so I'm assuming they're lying and would apply these rules to sports with the excuse that "nobody complained about their general rule applying to sports"
It's rather clear that, without limiting language, this does in fact apply to athletics.
It's also notable how cool Emma seems to be with effectively turning multiplexing one law into several. "We can't have just one law governing women's rights in schools, we're going to address schools, lockr rooms, bathrooms, harassments, jurisprudence in this law first. *Then* we'll address athletics, which totally won't have anything to do with the locker rooms, bathrooms, harassment, or judges, which we're covering now, later.
"What are you complaining about, we're just greasing the slippery slope, we haven't sent you down it yet!"
These whiners don't have standing.
" In particular, we need a rule that recognizes that both women and transgender women are protected classes—both have liberties that need to be preserved."
Sorry. This assumes facts not in evidence. It is undeniable fact that Women- biological women- are a protected class, because "protected class" is a legislated construct. To my knowledge there is ZERO federal legislation defining Transgendered Women as a protected class. So I do not see that we "need a rule" for recognizing such a thing.
What happens when two protected classes' protections contradict each other?
Deathmatch?
Transwomen have superior upper body strength so...
Popcorn time.
They go to the flow chart. If you're a gay, trans black woman you can win any argument.
...as long as you're a Democrat and not some self-hater.
Amusingly it's easier to make the claim that you are a biologically different sex than it is to be 'trans-racial'. That will get you burned on a cross by everyone.
This has always been super bizarre to me because there are lots and lots of white people who grow up in predominantly black areas and largely adopt the culture there (and vice versa, one of them even became president). They dress like the people they live around, they talk like them, act like them. The concept of a "transracial" person makes perfect sense if you consider race to be primarily cultural rather than biological. Humans can and do choose what cultures to participate in all the time. Why would that be verboten?
Something similar to what happens when they crossed the streams in Ghostbusters. Its bad.
You rank them on the intersectionality ladder, and the one with the most grievances wins.
The oppression Olympics decide who gets protected.
I am honestly tired of libertarians even pushing the idea of protected classes instead of fighting for people as individuals.
This guy gets it.
Reason isn’t libertarian.
instead of fighting for people as individuals.
Except when they are Venezuelan migrants seeking asylum. In that case, fuck 'em, assume they are lying about their asylum application, and ship them back.
Back to Martha’s Vineyard? They already admitted they were lying about being a sanctuary for immigrants Lying Jeffy.
They didn't need a sanctuary city because they weren't trying to be protected from the government, having committed no crimes. But that wasn't good enough for them not to be stripped of their rights to individuality.
"Striped of their rights to individuality." It's like a progressive predictive word text response.
You should eat a snickers fatso, you’re too hangry to be posting. Fucking cunt.
DeSantis' political stunt that shed light on the entire issue of illegal immigration the current adminstration has been massively negligent in dealing with really has upset you.
Always sad when rich, elitist, white folk have to face reality.
"Transgendered Women" are a class of vile sociopath rapist pedophilic thugs who need to be "protected" to the extent of being publicly beaten to death.
Cardona tried to be sneaky by separating the athletic issue from the bathroom and other trans issues. Citizens saw through it and commented away. Emma Camp gets mad.
...redefinition of "sex discrimination" to include discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity...
...a large portion of the public comments appears to be expressing consternation over a subject irrelevant to this most recent spate of Title IX rules: transgender athletes in women's sports.
These things are directly related, and if you don't see it you're the exact person that's causing the problem.
They want to define 'sex' as 'gender' but notably the law doesn't say a single word about gender and even the 'gender studies' people are telling us loudly and clearly that they aren't the same thing.
If sex and gender are constructs, or whatever, then do away with segregated sports entirely or shut the fuck up.
If being a woman is a state of mind, then legal protections of women have no basis.
"The "glass delusion" is an extraordinary psychiatric phenomenon in which people believe themselves to be made of glass and thus liable to shatter....
"Sufferers were seen to be normal in all ways [except for] the belief that they had turned to glass, and so could function, albeit anxious that other people shouldn't come too close and risk shattering fragile limbs."
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32625632
Man, I'm pretty out there at times.
But it sure makes me feel good to know that folks are so unbelievably fucked up that they can imagine themselves in wildly distorted ways. What a miserable life. Maybe it's schadenfreude, but it gives me a sense of superiority to have such mundane problems.
The glass people are pretty bad, too.
^ Exactly this.
Furthermore, is anyone surprised that a woman might be a little pissed off to be told that she can be 100% understood by a man to the point where the man is indistinguishable from a 'real' woman?
I should ask some M2F Trans folk how awful their periods are. Like, are we talking heavy flow or will a tampon do? What's it like to have a baby? They will literally never know more than a man on those subjects.
I would have more respect for the trans movement if they went with the Americans with Disabilities Act instead of trying to tear reality down around everyone that isn't crazy. It's a delusion on a scale that is almost incomprehensible to the average human, and I put 99% of the blame on those that enable this insanity rather than the crazy person that really can't help it.
Most of the children are engaging in this stuff due to the desire to differentiate themselves from the herd and appear more interesting. More dangerous, and less fun than college pop-culture lesbians (unless you're the resident Reason pedophile, of course).
Yeah "gay till graduation" was definitely a phenomenon when I was in college. I was able to make bisexuals out of some of the "lesbians" and I didn't have to accuse them of any kind of "phobia," but of course it was a different era.
both have liberties that need to be preserved.
We all have the same liberties regardless of any protected class status. Rights are universal.
Thank you for saying this.
Anything else is the road to some pigs being more equal than others.
You two need to learn how to equity.
Just for clarity, there is no "Right to misrepresent oneself as the opposite sex." anywhere in the founding documents. Further, even if the founding documents actually said "An amorphous gender spectrum, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to present themselves as the opposite sex, shall not be infringed.", it would still be illegal to do so in schools, post offices, court houses, on public transportation...
No one who supports men (or boys) competing in women’s (or girl’s) sports has one ounce of intellectual integrity or a sense of sportsmanship. It’s as simple as that.
If only we had a simple word to describe people born with uteruses and smaller less-muscular bodies who are generally regarded as needing protection because of their weaker status. If only those people could play sports among themselves.
Doesn’t letting dudes compete in women’s sports kinda discriminate against women? I guess Emma isn’t a biologist.
"The public comments submitted on Cardona's proposed Title IX regulations show how desperately comprehensive rules for transgender athletes are needed. In particular, we need a rule that recognizes that both women and transgender women are protected classes—both have liberties that need to be preserved."
Yeah Emma. Libertarians are desperate for government bureaucrats to make rules so we will know whose liberties need to be preserved.
n particular, we need a rule that recognizes that both women and transgender women are protected classes
False. We nee to eliminate the concept of 'protected classes' entirely
What we need to do is privatize schools, and let the various private replacements voluntarily organize interscholastic and intramural sports as they please.
We could also look to the European model of sports cluns not connected to schools. A lot of us may have played baseball in non-school leagues (Little League, Babe Ruth, Connie Mack, American Legion ball) and basketball (YMCA, CYO, AAU.)
Intercollegiate sport is, in many ways, a ruse to get alumni to donate.
"However, the degree to which the subject has captured public attention will make it difficult to develop sensible policy. Good, minimally invasive policy is rarely compatible with a culture war. "
Yes, nothing worse in a democracy than the populace getting in the way of the elite shaping society.
Jesus fucking Christ, camp.
The libertarian case against democracy.
Funny thing about the word "democracy."
Know how many times it occurs in the Constitution?
Take a guess.
It's funny how often you bring that up when it's about something you support, groomer.
But you're all 'democracy, democracy, democracy' when the proles vote they way you want.
i am seriously done with the transo nonsense. The pendulum can't swing back far and fast enough IMO
You are not alone.
The MAPs are next in line. A year from now the trannys will be no more important than gays and lesbians as we collectively defend the rights of pedophiles. Reason libertarians are ahead of the curve on this one just like they were on weed, mexicans and buttsex.
In particular, we need a rule that recognizes that both women and transgender women are protected classes—both have liberties that need to be preserved.
And here everyone was saying that Reason isn't particularly libertarian anymore. I hope you all feel embarrassed now upon reading that line.
Yeah what's libertarian about thinking people should have liberties?
People, yes. Categories, no.
Categories are abstract concepts. They won't feel a thing either way.
What you're worried about is the imagined injustice of one group of historically oppressed people leapfrogging over straight white men to get special privileges heretofore unknown to our species. Fat chance.
Most anti-discrimination law in America protects straight white men same as anyone else. They are protected from discrimination on the basis of sex, color, and sexual orientation. These "protected classes" are a right-wing myth.
" In particular, we need a rule that recognizes that both women and transgender women are protected classes—both have liberties that need to be preserved."
Uh, Camp - women are not a protected class. I do not know WTF you got that idea.
Everyone except white, heterosexual, Christian, conservative men over the age of 35 are a protected class.
What planet have you been vacationing on?
These kids beg for "equality" (come on, nobody is discriminated these days), yet they don't even understand what they want to fight for... smh
In Commie-Education land turning girls into boys and boys into girls is of the HIGHEST importance.... Maybe 'commie' land isn't all it's cracked up to be but instead belongs in a mental institution.
Fuck these people. I mean don't fuck these people. I mean... fuck.
Fail.
Go back and read the administration proposal.
They intentionally swap out gender identity for sex in a way that makes it illegal to have single sex facilities, but legal to have single gender facilities.
The "we will do sports later" claim is a lie. It is baked into the formula they are adopting.
They say sex is innate, therefore you cannot discriminate. So no women (sex) only sports. That would be illegal discrimination.
But women (gender) only sports is a legal form of discrimination.
They made this crystal clear. No more female only bathrooms. No female only dorms. Just women (gender) only.
This is their new rational. It is a pretty powerful one. It adopts the "innate qualities" paradigm and kinda flips some things on their head. I am sure trans activists will claim they are born trans and it is innately who they are. But the law of the land is going to be that this is entirely a choice.
The “we will do sports later” claim is a lie. It is baked into the formula they are adopting.
Disagree. This part is true. The funny part is, it exposes the underlying oxymoron. Basically, it’s bureaucratically simple to tell the engineering students “The dorms are now co-ed.” relative to telling athletes *and alumni and fans* “You’re going to watch this man beat this woman black and blue and you’re going to like it.” And, if there were no need to separate sports to begin with, it would be effectively the same as making the dorms co-ed.
It should be pretty clear that they are taking their time to meticulously plot out how they’re going to rationalize and change the science to support their foregone conclusion and that the fact that they didn't do it with the first portion of this means, they're going to use a different logic and/or set of criteria for sports.
If you care about even a little bit about trans kids in school athletics, you are a moron and probably a pervert. You're definitely a brainwashed cum dumpster of right-wing media.
What's funny is that Trump is always late to the culture war hysteria du jour. He's not leading this cult. He's just another pawn of whoever stands to benefit from turning the US into a fascist state. I'm gonna go with Charles Koch and a number of other funders of both anti-democratic and pro-culture-hysteria propaganda efforts.
Ok, groomer.
pawn of whoever stands to benefit from turning the US into a fascist state.
Trump is a pawn of the lefturds?
Get your meds adjusted.
-jcr
"If you care about even a little bit about trans kids in school athletics"
...there's the issue. Do not support people demanding I lie about their sex.
There's a surprising amount to unpack in "support," demanding," and "lie." Also "sex" for that matter.
You're not going to be arrested for being rude to a trans person. You're just going to cause an awkward scene, as rudeness tends to do.
Some say the spirit of free speech entails rudeness as a sometimes-useful tool. I believe axiomatically that there is never a good excuse for rudeness.
Either way, we're not sending the government after you, so why don't you stop sending the government after trans people?
You’re not going to be arrested for being rude to a trans person. You’re just going to cause an awkward scene, as rudeness tends to do.
Telling mentally ill people they're mentally ill and in denial of biological reality causes awkwardness, I'm sure.
That's what I said.
But the last people bound to be in denial of biological reality are trans people. They're acutely aware of their own biology. So it must be the case that you're in denial of rhetorical reality. But that's no great crime.
The crime is when you start murdering trans people because they make you uncomfortable, a thing you've so soft-dickedly bragged about doing at least three or four times on this thread.
Who is murdering trans people?
Dave chappelle. Or his violent minions. So says tony.
He’s a hoot.
Tony's delusions that he uses to maintain his false narratives.
But the last people bound to be in denial of biological reality are trans people. They’re acutely aware of their own biology. So it must be the case that you’re in denial of rhetorical reality.
Nah, your side simply demands that others acede to such obvious lies.
The crime is when you start murdering trans people because they make you uncomfortable, a thing you’ve so soft-dickedly bragged about doing at least three or four times on this thread.
Cite?
You know you're off the rails when you think mentally ill people suffering from delusions are the ones who are accurately aware of reality.
Parents don't want their daughters preyed upon by men pretending to be women, nor do they want their daughters to participate in a fad that causes them to mutilate and sterilize themselves. Neither of those concerns is "moronic" or "perverted".
They probably also don't want their children mutilated by gunfire in their classrooms, but that's just the price we have to pay for freedom.
School shootings would be preventable if teachers were trained to carry weapons and required to protect children.
It is our leftist, vagina-centric education system that is killing kids, both in schools and in inner cities. People like YOU are responsible.
They'd also be preventable if we banned the sale and ownership of firearms.
Sorry bud, this is a clear cut mathematical calculation. The freedom to own firearms is more important than the lives those firearms will take. That's your position, and you should defend it on its merits without resorting to fairy tales about each and every teacher in America being a cold-blooded crack shot.
But since you are willing to accept the risk of classrooms of children being slaughtered, you can go ahead and shut up about this nearly totally mythical "problem" of trans athletes. Let school boards and sports leagues set their rules and stop sending the fucking feds after children. I'm sure the locals know what they're doing.
Sorry bud, this is a clear cut mathematical calculation. The freedom to own firearms is more important than the lives those firearms will take
It was certainly more important than Joseph Rosenbaum's and Anthony Huber's.
I got it dude, you want to see people who disagree with you murdered en masse. It was always going there.
I want to see violent leftists get their "direct action" shoved right back at them. Don't be violent, and you won't have to worry about it.
Only if they send you to come get them. How can anyone help but be disarmed by your cattiness and sophisticated medulla oblongata? Who says Oklahoma is only full of backwards republican voting bigots? Why they have Tony, hoo-ray!!!
I'm trying to talk politics, and you people keep talking about who you want to murder over their politics.
As usual, you are the only one talking about murder, tony.
Banning the possession and sale of firearms is unconstitutional.
Banning firearms does not prevent school shootings.
You can pass laws against firearm ownership all you want, it won't prevent criminals from obtaining firearms and it won't prevent school shootings. Same way you can pass laws against drug dealing all you want, it won't prevent drugs from being sold.
Assholes like you are responsible for children being unsafe in schools, for children being surgically mutilated and castrated, and for children to be exposed to utterly inappropriate sexual content.
Whatabout! Drink!
You have sex with children.
Just come out and say it.
The proposed regulations would also bar schools from "adopting a policy or engaging in a practice that prevents a person from participating in an education program or activity consistent with their gender identity."
That would include barring a trans woman from participating in women's sports. So the question of whether or not to do so is not at all "a subject irrelevant to this most recent spate of Title IX rules".
It's up to the organizers of any event to decide who they want to invite. Government should not be involved in any way at all in these events.
The lefturds can let dudes in drag humiliate women in contests that the women have no hope of winning, but they shouldn't be surprised if serious female athletes choose events that are women-only.
-jcr
That would mean abolishing title IX.
Creating rules protecting mental delusions is just the latest iteration of crazy.
Back in the 1970s, Phyllis Schlafly claimed that the Equal Right Amendment would be used to take away women-specific privileges such as separate restrooms and locker rooms for women. Feminists mocked her, but the ERA was never ratified.
Now that the left has redefined women they don't need the ERA. They're using Title IX to make Shlafly's concerns come true and the feminists who mocked her are now mocked as TERFs.
What comes around goes around.
I'm not sure what's "tangential" about kicking men out of universities based on false accusations by vindictive ex-girlfriends, or about having women to see penises in women's shower rooms. That's what people are complaining about.
The tuition-paying proles aren't the vox populi, Emma Camp is the vox populi.
How is hosting trans athletes anything but sex discrimination? This is allowing biological men compete against women in women’s sports.
How is allowing men into women's dressing rooms and bathrooms anything but sex discrimination, and sexual intimidation?
Here’s sensible policy:
1. Government completely gets out of education and repeals all anti-discrimination laws.
2. It’s all private, so now they can all do whatever the fuck they want.
3. The market will decide.
The market will decide that only the children of the rich will even be literate.
It’s not like your side’s done a bang-up job the last 30 years or so, considering how many college freshmen need remedial courses.
That's the status quo in America, because the public education system is failing while public school teachers and school administrators are enriching themselves.
School vouchers and private education would solve that problem, but because public school teachers are a captive voting bloc for Democrats and corrupt public sector unions are in bed with Democrats, US students continue to fail.
*Sigh* We used to accuse people of being neurosexist if they argued that men and women have different brains. Now it is trendy to believe that differences between the brains of men and women trump differences between their genitals. It means anyone with testicles who is bad at math can compete in women's sports.
You don't have to worry about any of that as long as you agree not to use the government to hurt anyone.
Nah, your side is definitely going to get its own repressive tolerance shoved right back at it.
Oh, so while my side isn't actually using the government to hurt unwoke people, you promise to use the government to hurt vulnerable minorities purely for the purposes of retaliation... against nothing.
How grand, we're at the "fuck it, we don't need justification anymore" stage.
Oh, so while my side isn’t actually using the government to hurt unwoke people
Yeah, it is.
How grand, we’re at the “fuck it, we don’t need justification anymore” stage.
We got there thanks to you.
"My side isn’t actually using the government to hurt unwoke people."
The delusions you suffer from are actually quite impressive.
So give an example of a law punishing someone for being insufficiently woke.
Just one.
The only "trans rights" we need to be worried about ensuring is their right to be publicly bull-whipped all the way to the nearest insane asylum, with the keys to be thrown into the cracks of Mt. Doom.
Sociopathic narcissistic predators, each and every one.
Trans women are not women. They are men. There is no right to be on the women's team.
It's not complicated