Why Forgiven Student Loan Debt Should Probably Be Taxed as Income
In six states, accepting student loan forgiveness is likely to result in an increased tax bill.

President Joe Biden's recently unveiled student debt forgiveness proposal might just have an unintended consequence for residents of six states: an increased tax bill. While most states plan to follow the federal government's lead and not treat one-time student loan forgiveness as taxable income, six states have no such plans. While Arkansas, Minnesota, West Virginia, and Wisconsin might decide to exempt federal student loan forgiveness from taxation, two states—Mississippi and North Carolina—have formal plans to tax loan forgiveness.
The results of this taxation could be an unexpected financial hit to many receiving loan forgiveness. According to Inc., depending on the state and the amount forgiven, individuals may see their taxes rise by $500 to $985.
However, according to Neal McCluskey, the director of the Center for Educational Freedom at the CATO Institute, low-income borrowers still stand to benefit in the long term from debt forgiveness.
"Typically, the people who are struggling the most with this debt actually have low debt, often below $10,000," McCluskey tells Reason. "So I think they'll be much better off for that debt having been forgiven even if it leads to some minor increase in their state taxes."
McCluskey argues that the largest tax increases are likely to affect those Americans with larger student loan balances—a group that is disproportionately middle and upper-middle class. According to an Education Data Initiative report, the average student debt held by a borrower in the bottom quartile of yearly incomes was over $10,000 less than the average student debt held by a borrower in the third quartile of yearly incomes. The third quartile includes individuals making up to $121,318 a year and, thus, roughly comprises the upper reaches of eligibility for Biden's loan forgiveness plan.
Though some borrowers may experience an unwelcome increase in their tax bill, it is probably fair for states to view students' debt relief as taxable income.
While Biden has announced that this particular suite of loan forgiveness will not be taxed federally, the Education Department currently views forgiveness from income-driven repayment plans, a popular option for discharging loans, as taxable income. Indeed, other forms of debt forgiveness are, generally, regarded by the IRS as taxable income.
"I think what's more objectionable is the idea that you get debt forgiven and it isn't taxable income, which is what we're seeing at the federal level. Because that money, those loans came from taxpayers to begin with." McCluskey says. "You should be repaying your debt because you've taken it from people who actually have no choice whether or not you got it, and the agreement was you would repay."
Not only would classifying student debt forgiveness as taxable income follow Education Department precedent, but it would also act as a slight penalty after what is otherwise a massive reward for a group largely experiencing the benefits of a college education.
"I think it's sort of a second slap to taxpayers to say, 'Not only have you not repaid the debt, but you won't even pay taxes on essentially what was money given to you from taxpayers,'" McCluskey says. "The people with the biggest debt tend to be in the jobs with the highest lifetime income prospects. And the people who are really struggling to repay debt, maybe people who are in bankruptcy or something like that, they probably won't pay very much [in taxes]."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
How did Republicans handle income taxes on their American Dream Down Payment Act in 2001? That was a direct $10,000 payment to first time homebuyers.
Dubya was so proud of his "ownership society".
Republicans didn't oppose that handout. Strange? Not really.
OMG, your #DefendBidenAtAllCosts game is absolutely on fire today. 🙂
A less skilled Democratic Party spokesman would probably just avoid topics when he knows he can't come right out and endorse what Biden is proposing. Not you though! Your judo is so advanced, you effortlessly redirect criticism of 2022 Democratic policy into complaints about what Republicans did two decades ago.
I like how they also just blew past the legal legislative act and compared it to Bidens unconstitutional executive order.
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I have not ever thought like it would even achievable however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail. Look extra details
going this article… https://libertyinc0me.neocities.org/
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (anu-04) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
You NEED me, don't you OBL?
I know your real target is the Reason staff but they won't respond in the comment section like I do.
FWIW, the student loan forgiveness is bad policy and probably won't survive a legal challenge.
But it is good politics. And good timing for November.
Welcome back, Plug. As good as OBL is, he just isn’t clever enough to be as stupid as you are.
A few years back SPB posted kiddy porn to this site, and his initial handle was banned. The link below details all the evidence surrounding that ban. A decent person would honor that ban and stay away from Reason. Instead SPB keeps showing up, acting as if all people should just be ok with a kiddy-porn-posting asshole hanging around. Since I cannot get him to stay away, the only thing I can do is post this boilerplate.
https://reason.com/2022/08/06/biden-comforts-the-comfortable/?comments=true#comment-9635836
Don't respond to SPB, just shun him.
Judge the man, not his words.
Seriously, you are a fucking idiot. Since I assume you are playing the coquette, as usual, what you are really advocating is to judge SPB by what he is saying today instead of his past actions.
When the action is posting kiddie porn, I don't give a fuck what he says. Until the end of time.
Same goes for you and your repugnant gaslighting. You are gaslighting us about the kiddie porn poster. Go put a gun in your mouth and end the pain for all of us.
It is one of the few allies he has left.
he gets the same treatment as Misek.
If you are a holocaust denier or a pedophile, you get a forever shunning.
You're convinced that this is true about some stranger on the internet because of what other strangers on the internet said about this stranger on the internet?
I mean overt has posted the evidence dozens of times. Many of us were there when it happened. But your drunk amnesia rushes to the defense of one of your last allies.
Considering the fact that you lie more than the average police officer, I must conclude that you're full of shit and were not there when "it" happened.
"Judge the man, not his words."
What's with that stick up your ass?
I'm sorry. Do you want it back?
Daughter says QAnon radicalized Walled Lake father before he killed mother, dog, injured sister
‘I didn’t even cry, I was just so shocked I couldn’t even believe it’
WALLED LAKE, Mich. – The 21-year-old daughter of a man who police said killed his wife, the family dog and severely injured his 25-year-old daughter said her father was radicalized by QAnon.
QAnon is an online conspiracy that believes in a pedophilic cult of the elite that planned the COVID pandemic and stole the election. Rebecca Lanis, 21, said QAnon radicalized her father and sent him over the edge.
“He started reading about the stolen election and Trump and then he started getting deeper into it and then when the vaccines came out and COVID, he started reading all that,” Rebecca Lanis said.
Seek help, all you QAnon sickos.
Your Trump Cult is deep in CT.
And you are deep in CP
Oh what a tangled web we weave/When first we practice to deceive.
And reason plays right along.
LOL. What about when Dems held actual African slaves? I didn't hear them complaining then. They were so proud of that "ownership society". Strange? Not really. The tradition carries on...
Hey look a child molester
I don't know but, unlike Biden's EO, sounds like it was statutorily authorized.
Why Forgiven Student Loan Debt Should Probably Be Taxed as Income
In six states, accepting student loan forgiveness is likely to result in an increased tax bill.
Why is an 18 yr old fork lift driver paying for a French Literature Degree major's college debt?
Better question, why can an 18 year old walk into a bank and walk out with a $100K loan by saying xe'll use it to buy a French literature degree? If that same 18 year old walked in with a real business plan, he'd get laughed out of there in minutes.
Because one of those will be covered by federal guarantees.
why can an 18 year old walk into a bank and walk out with a $100K loan by saying xe'll use it to buy a French literature degree?
Since 2010, student lending has been been run directly by the US Government and that 18 year old isn't walking into a bank to borrow $100K for a French Literature degree. Xe is going to "ScrewTheUSTaxpayer.ed.gov"
Yeah, but I think Sallie Mae bought those bank loans up prior to 2010.
And notice how the GOP quit bitching about Fannie Mae 2017-2021?
They could have killed federal interference in the mortgage market like they always said they wanted. But no....
I seem to remember Congress being obsessed with something else….
Remember the articles claiming how profitable the student loans were for US government. I do.
Easy answer. How are the taxes handled when an unsecured debt is discharged in bankruptcy? This should be the same.
Bankruptcy and loan forgiveness are different.
In bankruptcy you are "wiped out" in order to pay back what you can to your debtors. For example, you will lose your house to the bank in return for discharging the mortgage. You may be forced to sell ancillary assets in order to repay some of your other debts. The whole purpose of the bankruptcy court is to ensure that you don't just "dump your debt obligations" while keeping life going. It is treated like the dissolution of a company- fire sales and all. As a result of this very tough process, the IRS does not tax the remaining debt forgiven, just as they wouldn't tax a company that went out of business.
On the other hand, loan forgiveness is selective. A person may get one loan forgiven for many reasons, despite the fact that they still own many assets and means of paying it. During the Housing Crisis, many people applied for and received partial loan forgiveness. The Banks reduced the amount of the mortgage closer to the current (deflated) value of the house. And those people were liable to pay taxes on the amount reduced.
If your company pays you $100,000 you owe taxes on it. If the company instead "loans, wink, wink" it to you and "forgives" it next year, the IRS is not fooled. And it is yet another fuck-you to people who have played by the rules- often including paying taxes on forgiven loans- that a bunch of millennials are getting a tax free gift from Uncle Biden.
And while I can't speak for modern times, in Bankruptcy, your credit score went into the septic tank for about 10 years, and no serious lender would touch you with a fork.
Except this isn't bankruptcy. That is a very special circumstance.
In this case a closer analog might be when you can't pay a credit card and default, but don't declare bankruptcy. In that case, they will send a letter of debt forgiveness after they write the debt off their books and the original debtor is on the hook for taxes as though it was income.
It remains to be seen if POTUS Biden even has that authority = abrogate contracts and cancel loans
Fuck that shit. No taxes should collected as this should immediately be ruled unconstitutional and Joe Biden should be impeached (for this and others).
I looked into this for a friend and the feds are only forgiving loans owned by the feds. So if your friend consolidated a bunch of different federal loans into one private loan with a low interest rate, your friend is not eligible for student loan forgiveness. There's nothing to forgive. Nelnet or whatever paid it off a long time ago.
Like how if you get a do-nothing "public service" job you're eligible for loan forgiveness, but if you're one of the contractors who does all the actual work you're not.
"For a friend"
You're so observant and profound! You got me! Oh my jeebus! So clever! I really wasn't asking for a friend! I'm so embarrassed! You're so smart!
"For a friend"
look what time it is
I got 1099ed for an old whole life policy. I dutifully paid the tax. Fuck these assholes.
one singular policy & I'm finally on the demand side of the Great Upward Wealth Transfer ... & you want to tax me?
Yes.
Of course!
The tax bill will come in April, so well after the election where Biden purchased your vote.
Taxing this abominable payment just puts more money in the hands of government. It will NOT offset other taxes. More money to be wasted in government is the solution to nothing except the elimination of freedom.
Reason should know better.
Tax rate should be 100%.
You can have it your way. No one is stopping you. Send it in.
Not at all surprised that Reason, usually reliable in its anti-tax positions, flips on the issue in order to harp yet again on student loan forgiveness.
Nothing here constitutes an analysis of economic, fiscal, or tax policy. Just hand-waving - "It's only fair!" No, that's not how we make grown-up decisions, Emma.
Couldn't be bothered to talk to more than a single, Cato-affiliated "expert," either. You know, Emma, it's generally best practice to talk to at least a couple of sources.
Loan forgiveness isn't reduced taxes dummy.
It is money someone else gave you to spend whereas tax breaks are keeping what you've earned.
Why are leftists so stupid?
We are talking about taxing loan forgiveness, moron.
It’s breaking a contract, entered into voluntarily.
As citizens we have an interest in such contract since the consequences fall on us.
It is possible to be anti tax, and also to be anti-tax-free-gifts-from-the-government.
But Simon is not...the brightest bulb...so it escapes him.
It's going to be taxes paid by someone - wouldn't the least bad option be for them to be paid by the beneficiary, at least partially?
Dems in Congress knew they'd be forgiving student loans, which is why they added language to bill passed last year to except such "forgiveness" from taxation. They scored that at 0 costs, too, since at the time no loans were actually forgiven.
Federal exemption. Not state.
Sure, True.
But it shows malice aforethought.
Let's talk about California, since Reason hates the state so much they're based out of LA so they can hate it up-close and personal.
The California marginal tax rate for single/married-filing-separetely maxes out at ~10% for the ~60k-300k income bracket (the highest bracket we have to consider, as higher then that and you're ineligible for forgiveness anyway). So if you're in the top bracket, you'll get taxed at ~10% of $10k, or ~$1k.
As someone that has actually paid student loans in the last decade, I can tell you unequivocally that I paid more then $1k/year in student loans. For that matter, even if you were at perfectly $10k loans to start with, if you had a standard 10-year repayment plan then that'd be more then $1k/year.
And if you have a low-enough income that you're on an income-based repayment plan that stretches out to 20 years? Then you're not in that top tax bracket anyway, you're going to be much lower.
So yeah, some states are going to tax this. And it'll still be a good deal.
KMW and Suderman are in DC. Swamp creatures. It shows in the leftward lurch.
Reason arguing for income tax.
"libertarianism"
I seldom defend Reason but they are arguing for fairness. It has been the law for years that debt forgiveness is taxed. Why should student loan debt forgiveness be different? First it is totally wrong. This is not a private company writing off a loss, but the government picking and choosing who to give the benefit too. Second the President has no authority to do this, it has to be done by the legislature (Congress). Of course unless the current President has set himself up as a dictator. Also remember this is for Federal student loans, those that took private loans will still be paying.
After a debt is cancelled, the creditor will send the consumer a Form 1099-Cancellation of Debt. At that point, the consumer is then responsible for reporting this amount on his or her tax returns for that year.
Cons of credit card debt forgiveness
Tax consequences: When you pay less than you owe, you may be taxed on the forgiven amount. The IRS considers forgiven debt taxable income, and your lender will issue a 1099-C form to include on your tax return.
Unless the legislature changes the law in Indiana, it'll be taxed here as well.
The new research orbital base will be built by the joint efforts of large companies Lockheed Martin and Voyager Space Holdings, Hilton Designing Suites for Starlab Space Station - Orbital Today. The affiliate program began its way a couple of years ago since there was an acute demand for new offers in the form of space stations.