This Tennessee Town Claims Restricting Protests Helps 'Facilitate' the First Amendment
A new ordinance in Franklin will restrict evening and weekend protests and subject violators to misdemeanor charges.

In Franklin, Tennessee, the sun may be setting on residents' ability to participate in public demonstrations free of government interference. As part of city guidance that is "intended to facilitate the safe exercise of First Amendment rights," Franklin officials explain, they are significantly restricting when, where, and how residents may participate in any "public gathering and expression event."
Per an ordinance passed unanimously by the Franklin Board of Mayor and Aldermen (BOMA) last week, the city will not grant permits for any public gathering and expression events taking place after dark, nor will any event that does not require a permit be allowed to take place in the city after dark. The ordinance also prohibits expression events from taking place in the Downtown District between 5 p.m. on Fridays and 7 a.m. on Saturdays, as well as between 5 p.m. on Saturdays and 7 a.m. on Sundays.
Franklin's code defines public gathering and expression events as instances of "noncommercial public assembly" that take place on public property, are "likely to obstruct" vehicular or pedestrian traffic, or have over 20 participants. The ordinance also introduces restrictions targeting "events which require amplification or which occur more than once per month (regardless of size)," according to a background document prepared by city officials. Violations of the ordinance will carry a misdemeanor charge resulting in a citation.
"We as the city have the ability to navigate and to manage time, place and manner that those demonstrations happen," City Administrator Eric Stuckey said in June when the rule changes were first being considered. The city's background document claims that the ordinance will ensure Franklin "provides protection to all who wish to exercise" their First Amendment rights.
In 2019, BOMA adopted a structure to permit public gathering and expression events. That move followed white supremacist rallies in Charlottesville, Virginia, and nearby Shelbyville, Tennessee. "We saw it as a way to facilitate the exercise of First Amendment rights," said Stuckey of the permitting structure.
Franklin officials first floated the new restrictions on expression events at a June 14 meeting. City Attorney Shauna Billingsley outlined the ban on demonstrations after dark, saying, "We really don't think that's a safe thing for really anyone." The proposed restrictions originally included a ban on expression events from 5 p.m. on Fridays through 7 a.m. on Mondays in the downtown historic district, though this was ultimately scaled back.
"The reason for that" weekend ban, Billingsley explained, was that "it seems as though after work on Friday, our downtown turns into something different. It's much more shopping and eating, more social events and those kinds of things. So we're not sure that protests in the heart of downtown during the weekend should be permitted." She also stressed that "safety is important," noting that "police officers can't really watch over people in the dark."
As much as city officials stress this ordinance will protect First Amendment rights, it raises obvious concerns on that front. "Threatening misdemeanors for expressive activity after dark is going to put Franklin [on] a collision course with the First Amendment," says Adam Steinbaugh, attorney at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. "Municipalities can impose content-neutral limits on the time, place, or manner of expression, but those limits have to be reasonable and this isn't." For one, he explains, "not everyone can protest during the workday and a lot of expressive activity necessarily occurs in the evening."
What's more, the ordinance's broad wording may come to target completely innocuous expression events. "You want to tell me the city of Franklin wants to issue misdemeanors for Christmas carolers or people holding a candlelight vigil?" asks Steinbaugh. The potential for uneven enforcement also lingers. Steinbaugh offers a hypothetical: Will Franklin police be more likely to write up 21 Christmas carolers or 21 people protesting the police if both groups are violating the ordinance?
"The sun doesn't set on the First Amendment," says Steinbaugh. "Franklin's leaders should reconsider."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
to issue misdemeanors for Christmas carolers or people holding a candlelight vigil?
I could be wrong, but I bet that’s not what’s happening in the park after dark.
But if they are, the government is going to take their money regardless.
What? No more black Floydays in Tennessee?
Keeping the conflict out of free speech events will encourage free speech and make it easy to identify troublemakers.
Free speech isn’t about shouting down and intimidating those with different points of view.
Fuck off, nazi.
The purpose of your trolling is to silence free speech.
How’s that working for you loser?
You're the troll. But nevertheless, you're free to speak here and we're free to tell Nazis to fuck off.
You’re free to waste your time.
As indeed are you, nazi
On the contrary, I’m achieving my purpose, sharing the truth that is being censored around the world.
You trolls, not so much.
LOL
Don't tell me - you object to being called a Nazi because they didn't kill 6 million Jews?
You sheeple repeatedly bleat naaazi to satisfy your bigotry.
You never refute anything.
I enjoy feeding trolls and laughing when you choke every time.
Hahaha
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (ani-03) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
So, Kristallnacht will have to be Kristalltag now? That doesn't sound as fun.
ok https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/email-monster-oto-all-3-otos-links-bonuses-upsell-oto-links/
Freedom means asking permission and doing what you are told.
So, opposed to getting shot for trespassing or no?
?
After being without work for 6 months, I started completing a simple online work over this website I found online, and I couldn't be happier now. (res-08) Results... After 3 months of doing this my monthly income increased by 8900 per month by working for just several hours per week...Start by following the:-
.
Instructions here:>>> https://workofferweb24.pages.dev/
See my post below.
"The reason for that" weekend ban, Billingsley explained, was that "it seems as though after work on Friday, our downtown turns into something different. It's much more shopping and eating..."
Don't get in between the veal and their feedbag, it makes them anxious.
Ahem:
City of Seattle Free Speech permitting system.
The problem here, clearly isn't "Tennessee" but that we have quietly accepted the idea that a public demonstration of any kind requires a permit.
The application fee of $75 is waived for events designated as Free Speech Events. The application may be waived for Mixed Free Speech Events at the discretion of the Special Events Committee.
If you're protesting Trump, or you're with BLM, you're good. If you're protesting vaccine mandates, well then.
At the same time, unless the Franklin PD is marching around kicking in doors and vaccinating people, if you're protesting vaccine mandates by gathering in the park at night, you're doing it wrong. Even kinda doing it wrong even if the Franklin PD *is* marching around and kicking in doors, not that the ordinance would matter in that situation.
I mean, docs in your link above date to 2012 and should've applied to CHAZ, right?
A "Free Speech permitting system"?? This phrase is an oxymoron. It's not "free" if it requires a permit or needs a "designation" as such.
Has no one challenged this? Oh, wait, I forgot. To get an unconstitutional policy/law removed, we need the people who made it to admit they made a mistake, e.g., they exceeded their authority. If they don't limit their authority? That proves that a "self-limiting" govt. was not ever a thing, just a delusion of the Founding Fathers.
This story sounds like an exceedingly local nothingburger trying to be spun up into something it's not. Around here, the parks close at sunset already and you'll get picked up for loitering or vagrancy or other already. If you're lurking around the Village Hall at 10 p.m., you're trespassing. The local concert venue is allowed to have commercial performances after dark, but the music gets turned off at 11 (which I agree is lame but it's a pretty 'Kenny G' audience/venue anyway).
It doesn't sound like the ordinance is 'will issue' as much as 'shall issue' and if 20+ carolers are singing in the park after dark, they are trespassing. Were legitimate/'legitimate' protests of police action in Franklin normally attaining permits previously? Seems like if you wanted real reform, you'd got to City Hall when it was open.
I mean, it's not a great ordinance, but it's not really more onerous than state liquor laws or zoning ordinances.
Oh, that Kenny G. Not the real one, Kenneth Goldsmith.
He had irritainment programs on WFMU.
Democracy dies when there's snark in the dark
Franklin TN; been there, very nice place. It is known for a Civil War battle late in the conflict and there is an old mansion that was used as a field hospital; you can clearly see blood stains on the floor of one of the great rooms, where the surgeon did multiple amputations. Later learned that my GGF fought there [on the reb side].
Your Great Girl Friend sounds like a hard motherfucker.
Har de har har har BUCS.
Then they need better cleaning staff.
It’s seriously cool; it’s ingrained into the floor and you can see the outline of the boots of the surgeon from the blood that flowed down his vulcanized apron.
Nothing like channeling the sanguinary remains of Confederates.
Not sarcasm, actually curious:
Is this a reasonable attempt to regulate demonstrations, or an attempt to make it easier for demonstrators who are free during weekdays versus demonstrators who have to find time to demonstrate after their day jobs?
I'm gonna need to see evidence that the latter give shits about applying for permits in order to 'mostly peaceful protest' after dark.
Sorry, former. The demonstrators who are free during weekdays and protest at night.
"Captain, I wish you'd stop being so good to me . . . . . . "
C. H. Luke
So free speech requires a bunch of separate groups of nineteen people on public property, shouting instead of using "amplification", and staying off the sidewalks and streets.
Perhaps they should wear color coded arm bands to help the cops know which group of nineteen they belong to?
I assume the secondary title is 'the lawyer enrichment act of 2022'.
Would the slack-jaws of this Tennessee town make an exception for Christmas caroling, a suitable Halloween celebration (no signs of the devil, of course), a Fourth of July fireworks event, Christmas Eve candle-lighting, and the like?
Also, it is dark by the time most people leave work for much of the year, so . . . (disfavored) speech becomes impractical in Tennessee.
More politicians that have never read the Constitution.
Facilitating. Like how NY's constitutional prohibition of gambling, because it contains exceptions, is written into its bill of rights.
Freedom of speech doesn't create a duty to listen and "I don't want to see or hear that" is a legit claim. That means speech in public spaces is always going to be an imperfect balancing-act compromise, made worse by people on all sides trying to game the system, either to force their own speech on unwilling listeners or to block their opponents from speaking to a willing audience.
"If you don't like it, then don't look/listen" is reasonable exactly to the extent that not looking or listening is a reasonable option. In public spaces where it isn't a reasonable option, then Imperfect. Balancing. Act.
Will out of State protesters have to pay an additional premium , with the usual exceptions for unvaccinated illegal aliens?
"If it pleases the Crown, may I pronounce dismay at my ill treatment? "
Look, there is never a good time to protest simply because those being protested never want to hear/see it. It will always be a nuisance to somebody. "Don't block traffic" is about all the sympathy you'll get from me. Otherwise, 1A is not to your convenience and public property belongs to the public.
""Don't block traffic" is about all the sympathy you'll get from me."
Ah, a racist, eh?