Democratic Gubernatorial Candidate Who Defended COVID Lockdowns in Court Now Says They Were a Mistake
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro is trying to retcon two years of bad policy.

In May 2020, when roughly one-third of all Pennsylvania businesses were closed due to the state's heavy-handed COVID restrictions, the state's attorney general encouraged residents to rat out their neighbors for breaking the rules.
"See a #COVID19 health and safety violation? Report it!" Josh Shapiro tweeted, along with instructions for how narcs could report such violations to local law enforcement, the state Department of Health, and the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). "Following safety guidelines is how we'll get through this together," he added.
As the invocation of law enforcement suggests, those weren't really guidelines at all. Lots of states took aggressive action to limit social interactions in the early days of the pandemic, but few states went further than Pennsylvania. On March 19, 2020, Gov. Tom Wolf and his top public health officials drew up an arbitrary list of "non-life-sustaining" businesses that would be forced to close until further notice—many were not allowed to reopen for months, and then had to endure (or ignore) further state-mandated shutdowns during the holiday season. Federal labor data would later show that only Michigan and Puerto Rico saw a greater number of business closures due to government mandates during those first few months of the pandemic.
Publicly, Shapiro encouraged Pennsylvanians to report their neighbors for violating those lockdowns. Professionally, he went to state and federal courts (as was his duty as attorney general) to assert Wolf's authority to issue those shutdown orders.
Now that he's running for governor, however, Shapiro says that he was privately against it all.
"This is an area where I think folks got it wrong," Shapiro said of school and business shutdowns in an interview with the Associated Press. On mask and vaccine mandates, Shapiro told the A.P.'s Marc Levy that he believed the state needed to "educate" and "empower" individuals to make the best decisions for themselves.
"To me, that's the approach we need to take more broadly as a public, which is to educate, empower and respect people's personal decisions and respect their personal freedom to make those choices," Shapiro told the A.P.
There are two ways to view Shapiro's comments.
Perhaps he's admitting to having learned an important lesson about governing from having an up-close view of the Wolf administration's heavy-handed and unpopular COVID policies—so unpopular that state lawmakers and the public teamed up to pass a pair of constitutional amendments to limit future governors from taking similar actions.
On the other hand, this sure smells like some really convenient campaign trail retconning of the past two-plus years.
Even though we should be willing to cut Shapiro some slack for having to go to court to defend Wolf's policies—one of his recent predecessors as Pennsylvania attorney general, Kathleen Kane, tried refusing to defend state laws she didn't like and that didn't end well for her—the rest of this doesn't hold up to scrutiny. As the state's top legal officer, Shapiro surely had a place at the table as the emergency orders and mandatory business closures were being hashed out.
So when Shapiro says "folks got it wrong," he's obviously trying to distance himself from his own culpability.
Even if he initially believed those extreme measures were necessary but later had a change of heart, he could have registered his objections with reporters at any time. And if he truly objected to defending those policies, he could have resigned his post, as at least one other member of Wolf's administration did in response to lockdowns.
What's really happening here is that Shapiro is being forced to respond to a line of attack from his gubernatorial opponent, Republican state Sen. Doug Mastriano (R–Fayetteville). Trailing in the polls, Mastriano is hoping to make up ground by reminding Pennsylvanians just how much they disliked the state's COVID policies and by tying Shapiro to those decisions. He's likely trying to follow the same playbook as Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, the Republican who scored an unexpected victory last year after pledging to end mask mandates and school closures.
Shapiro distancing himself from the policies of the Wolf administration makes a cynical kind of political sense. It is another signal of just how untenable lockdown policies always were in a democratic system. His awareness of the importance of personal freedom is even perhaps an encouraging sign. But he ought to own up to being wrong.
It wasn't "folks" who screwed up Pennsylvania's response to COVID, forced businesses to close, and encouraged neighbors to snitch on one another for the crime of simply trying to earn a living. It was, at least in part, Josh Shapiro.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
He needs to suffer a totally embarrassing loss.
That's Oz's job.
Will the great people of Pennsylvania choose Mehmet the Turk or Scranton's Best Slingblade Impersonator?
I bet being from NJ is a bigger drag than being from Turkey.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (ani-07) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
It's not going to matter, the sheep in Philadelphia are going to vote democratic come hell or high water.
They were fighting with Los Angeles to be the last place with a ridiculous mask mandate.
Checks out.
After being without work for 6 months, I started completing a simple online work over this website I found online, and I couldn't be happier now. (res-12) Results... After 3 months of doing this my monthly income increased by 8900 per month by working for just several hours per week...Start by following the:-
.
Instructions here:>>> https://workofferweb24.pages.dev/
He supported shutdowns and now is pretending like he "ackshually" never supported shutdowns. Sounds like a typical worthless libertarian. Are we sure he's not just Matt Welch in drag?
Unfortunately he will not.
Boehm forgot to point out, that Democrat DAs have no problem not enforcing laws they don't want to enforce (e.g. rioting, looting, arson, damaging property during the George Floyd riots, or say immigration laws). So why didn't these DAs choose to not enforce the lockdowns and closures if they disagreed with them then? I say they're lying, just like the Big Guy.
They didn't prosecute Democrats that violated the rules (I use "rules", because AFAIK no law was duly passed giving the governor the power to close businesses). E.G., how about the salon owner and Pelosi who opened up to do Pelosi's hair? No charges.
Why is anyone supposed to believe he won't make more "mistakes" like this in the future?
Especially when he's not owning that it was he himself made a mistake, and calls it an issue "some folks" should have handled better.
Oh, but he really was against it privately the whole time; so he's either a liar and/or a coward.
This snitch-ass bitch SHOULD be running scared from this shit.
Smart of Mastriano to go after Shapiro on this, because the ads write themselves---"Josh Shapiro wanted your neighbors to snitch on you for going about your own business, so you'd get in trouble with the government and lose your livelihood. If he'd do that to you as Attorney General, just imagine what he'll do to harm you and your family when he's governor."
It's the same as people reading Reason and expecting them to not simp for the FBI, war, shutdowns, or whatever is fashion at the time. People are profoundly stupid. Almost as stupid as a Reason writer (almost)
We're all going to die from the Failed Trump Vaccine anyway.
Well, all you fish-tank-cleaner-eating, bleach-injecting, Trump-worshipers anyway. /unvaxxed
Where have you been Ra's? Maybe I'm wrong but it feels like I haven't seen your name in the comments for a while.
"Democratic Gubernatorial Candidate Who Defended COVID Lockdowns"
Lockdowns feel like they were a million years ago. Why dwell on the past?
Focus on what's important now. The guy is a Democrat. That means he agrees with us Koch / Reason libertarians on our most important issues — open borders and elective third trimester abortion access.
#Libertarianism101
Boy the hits just a'keep on comin' in, don't they?
There are two ways to view Shapiro's comments.
No, there's pretty much one way to view them.
"This is an area where I think folks got it wrong," Shapiro said of school and business shutdowns in an interview with the Associated Press. On mask and vaccine mandates, Shapiro told the A.P.'s Marc Levy that he believed the state needed to "educate" and "empower" individuals to make the best decisions for themselves.
"Folks" got it wrong. Not I got it wrong, not I was wrong, not I need to apologize for getting it wrong, not 'all the people I excoriated publicly and privately, called conspiracy theorists and chuckled when their careers and reputations were pounded into the mud were right and I was wrong'. Just 'folks' got it wrong.
I wonder if he has any comment on Fauci saying, "We needed to lock down sooner, harder, and be more strict about everything."
I don't give a shit.
Because now, when it is super popular to be against lockdowns, is not the time we need leaders who are against them.
We needed people in government with the testicular fortitude to say "Hey, um, this isn't working" two and a half years ago.
This plug isn't a leader, he's a follower. His opinion doesn't matter, he'll just say what's currently in vogue.
Just want to see each Democratic candidate say that they believe you shouldn't listen to the country's 'foremost medical expert', after years of throwing "Trust the experts," at everyone.
Yeah, that would be something to hear.
Won't happen until it becomes super popular to say it, though.
More proof that Reason is never critical of Democrats.
Shapiro distancing himself from the policies of the Wolf administration makes a cynical kind of political sense. It is another signal of just how untenable lockdown policies always were in a democratic system. His awareness of the importance of personal freedom is even perhaps an encouraging sign. But he ought to own up to being wrong.
I'll take whatever tepid criticism Reason has on offer.
Three day rager. I love your commitment!
Very mild criticism considering this guy threw millions out of work and cannot bring himself to own up to his horrible judgment.
Republicans really shot themselves in the dick in Pennsylvania...Mastriano and Oz are two of the worst political candidates I can remember. So we'll end up with Josh Shapiro as governor who is leaps and bounds better than John Fetterman who is going to be elected to the Senate.
We are all well and truly fucked.
There's no such thing as an easy win with the GOP. The better their position is, the more likely they are to fuck it up.
Yep, they do love snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
Their leadership loves to play Chamberlin to the Dem's Nazis, but none want to be Churchill.
Trump tries to be Churchill, but he ain’t
The PA GOP never fails to squander an opportunity.
"Now that he's running for governor, however, Shapiro says that he was privately against it all."
^ so he lied and sacrificed his constituents to appease his leftist colleagues. So let's reward him with electing him to the governorship.
Hitler may have been privately against the Holocaust. We will never know because he took his own life due to systemic bullying.
I come to Reason for the comments.
The good Rabbi has dropped some great ones today.
Another era of history where "some folks got it wrong", but top-level authorities were left powerless to steer the ship in a different direction...
These "authorities" are like 10,000 ants on a log, floating down the river, every one of them pretending they're steering.
Chem-jackoff was defending shutdowns the entire time
Here's a great video on The Great Backtrack.
Irony: The Canadian lockdown actions have been exposed by a British lawsuit. Apparently, the brits didn't think that what was going on in Canada was "too local".
Trudeau is such a piece of shit he's just going to double down regardless.
You know, I remember in the early days when people were discussing possible long-term side effects of the vaccine, and someone mentioned their doctor told them "there are no long term effects from the vaccine". A scientist smirked and said, "Well, that can't be true because if there were no long term effects from the vaccine, then it wouldn't work." Noting that what the doctor probably meant was there were no long term NEGATIVE side effects.
Based on what we know now, there weren't any long term positive effects either.
Rather wide-spread anecdotally, the short term effects are limited to a window between two weeks and two months after injection.
Mid-term effects TBD.
There are increasing numbers of statistics, most recently from Israel, showing large increases in all cause deaths among the vaxxed and among the young in particular. I don't know at this point if the vax is at fault but if the trend continues it will be undeniable in the near future. It's pretty obvious that the Covidians are currently trying to get out ahead of the story. Lefty trolls and Democrat members of Congress are now claiming these are "Trump's Vaccines" and he is guilty of any consequences because he pressured the CDC to approve them before their trials were completed. Watch for this trend to continue. It will become the unified narrative of the media in the coming weeks.
I think Trump totally got rolled on the vaccine and pretty much the rest of the Covid scam but as Otter famously explained to Flounder, You fucked up. You trusted us.
And they counted everybody in days 1-40 (or so) of the vax regimen as "unvaxxed", so they could sweep all those effects under the rug.
Shapiro says that he was privately against it all.
Well I say, "Fuck You, Asshole" in public.
And then have somebody who was actually enthusiastic about them fill the office?
I never countenanced that idea. I'd much rather have an unenthusiastic slave master over me than an enthusiastic one. If you object to the job, stay in it and subvert from within, without being noticeable about it.
No, you stand up like a man and make them fire you.
What good does that do the rest of us?
It stoked courage among those that go along to get along. I might agree there is good use for both ways of doing it, but definitely far more in standing up to authority over what is right and suffering for it than just quitting and hiding.
How'd it stoke courage? When they saw the result, they were discouraged from doing the same thing.
That’s how you get the Holocaust.
That's how Galen Erso did it. #rebelscum
We do not have to give him leeway because he was "just following orders".
When your employer tells you to do something you find immoral, you either find a way to not do it or you quit. Anything else makes you the worst kind of whore.
So you want to be replaced by someone who thinks it's moral?
It would have made a difference if he had spoken out publically instead of "following orders" like the good little Nazi he is.
Do you have to relentlessly strawman people who are advocating not following immoral orders? They aren't saying what you keep saying they are that they would rather have an enthusiastic replacement. They are saying don't follow immoral orders. It's only hard for you to understand because you follow immoral orders, and think that if you rationalize hard enough it will all get better. It doesn't matter to the victims whether you disagree or not, it matters if you harm them. Now go unenthusiastically follow some orders you disagree with, and tell yourself you are a good person for doing it because you're doing what you dislike, and some hypothetical person would like it while they do it. Disgusting reasoning, as it voids all personal responsibility simply based on expressed sentiment.
Unfortunately that's not how it really is in practice. Roberta describes what politicians would actually do when disposing an unwilling compliant.
Wait a minute Boehm, is he part of the adults that are back in charge?
Good and hard, Boehm! Amirite? Keep reluctantly voting D!
Are we still pretending that the people who said "there are Russians under my bed!" for four years and then couldn't give two shits on shutdowns are anything more than just standard white progressives? Pretty positive Boehm doesn't vote D "reluctantly". He's just your typical waste of space
If he didn’t have to worry about swing voters (PA is not CA or MA), Shapiro could have just said we all should still wear masks “for the children!” and be done with it. The fact that he didn’t tells me the donkey party knows this election isn’t going to be the slam dunk they are crowing about.
Reading articles at a Koch funded outlet berating politicians for supporting shutdowns gives me Iraq War deja vu when Reason started attacking people for supporting a war that their own publication advocated for. You too sucked on lockdowns, Koch whores. Now go away
Him and Wolf can burn in hell for all I care. They conspired to murder senior citizens and kill peoples livelyhoods here in PA.
There is a special place in hell for these guys.
More proof politicians will say anything to get elected. As if we needed any more proof of that,
No, things did not "end well" for Kathleen Kane, but that had more to do with committing perjury than not defending a state law.
Actually that had more to do with her not stepping down after she did the hit job on the Corbett Administration.
If you look at it they pulled the same thing on the former Secretary of State. They used the threat of charges hanging over her to force her resignation and silence.
Yes let's all literally die on the hill of the freedom to spread disease.
Is there some sort of significant crossover between conservatives and extraverts? Sorry the global pandemic was rough for you. Not as rough as those who died long, agonizing deaths, but, what was it? "They are too fat and old to live anyway"?
Because nobody died from vaccines, lockdowns, not being able to receive medical care for other issues, or from the total shut down of local and global economies.
And the 100k that died from drug overdoses, up like 100% from 2019, brought on by lockdowns, not to mention suicides.
The ‘cure’ of lockdowns was worse than the disease.
Sociopaths have no conscience. Obviously, Shapiro is sliding in this direction. Cancel him, now.
Greaseball Newsom not yet ready.