Selling a Home? The D.C. Down Payment Assistance Program Will Give You Up to $202,000.
The city's expanded down payment assistance program is a recipe for increasing home prices.

President Joe Biden's decision to forgive $10,000 in student loans has renewed the discussion about how government-subsidized borrowing has inflated the cost of higher education. Meanwhile, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser seems to be thinking: What if we did that for housing too?
Last week, the mayor urged residents to take advantage of the city's newly expanded Home Purchase Assistance Program (HPAP). Starting October 1, the program will provide residents with up to $202,000 in interest-free loans to help cover the costs of a first-time home purchase, plus an additional $4,000 to help cover closing costs.
The decades-old program previously provided home purchasers with $80,000 in interest-free loans. The increase is justified, officials argue, by today's hot housing market.
"We knew we had to do something to make the program more viable for potential home buyers," Deputy Mayor John Falcicchio told The Washington Post last week. "We wanted our residents to be the most prepared as they go into this hot housing market."
D.C. is certainly an expensive place to buy a home.
The real estate listing company Zillow says the typical D.C. home is worth $707,747—roughly twice the typical home cost nationally. Prices have increased 9 percent so far this year, according to the Case-Shiller home price index. That's slightly more than the national increase in prices but far less than the 20-plus percent increases in such cities as Atlanta and Tampa.
These interest-free loans will probably increase those prices further. Indeed, the value of that subsidy is more likely to be captured by home sellers than by homebuyers.
The whole purpose of down payment assistance is to get more people to buy homes. That's another way of saying that it is increasing the demand for home purchases. Economics 101 tells you that increasing demand, all else being equal, will increase prices. Homebuyers with more money can be less price-sensitive, and home sellers can be choosier about purchasers. All that encourages those sellers to increase prices.
We've seen a similar phenomenon with student loans. One 2017 study found that for every dollar increase in student loan subsidies, tuition rose by 60 cents. But student loans come with interest rates that limit people's willingness to borrow, and therefore constrain universities' ability to raise prices. D.C.'s homebuyer assistance program provides interest-free loans. When the costs of borrowing are free, you can expect people to make full use of the program.
In a normal market, you'd expect price increases to induce a supply effect. More demand encourages suppliers to enter a market, which helps moderate price increases.
But don't expect to see much of that in D.C.'s housing market. For starters, the city has only so many vacant or redevelopable plots of land where new housing could go. Redeveloping existing housing into more units is constrained by the city's zoning laws and historic preservation rules. Meanwhile, rising inflation and persistent supply-chain issues have caused new home construction to plummet, as high material costs make builders less willing to take on new projects.
All that suggests any supply effect from D.C.'s expanded downpayment assistance will be pretty muted. Home prices will increase, and home sellers will gobble up most of the value of the interest-free loans. Homebuyers who don't qualify for the program will be worse off, as they'll have to contend with these higher prices without the help of any subsidies.
It's telling that the maximum available loan from the HPAP program has crept up over the years—from $50,000 in 2016 to $80,000 as of last year, and now $202,000—to match ever-rising home prices.
Clearly, the program is not fixing the city's underlying affordability problems. In fact, it's making the situation worse.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I wonder where all the money to cover any loan defaults will come from.
Haha. I joke. I'm not wondering about that at all.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (am-06) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
Apparently housing prices going up is not inflation. It's the American Dream - which is in need of subsidies
I think I might be the only homeowner in existence who sees rising home prices as a bad thing, who wants to see the mortgage interest deduction abolished.
A home should be a home. It should NOT be a monetary investment, it should be a home investment in that after a few decades of mortgage payments you own a home free and clear of any bank interest. It's an investment that you have your home during your golden years, NOT that you can continue to make second and third mortages to fund your unsustainable lifestyle.
Every other non-production good loses value over time. But not housing. It just keeps going up by government design, and any change to that status would mean widespread middle class revolt. And so we get housing or mortgage crisis ever eighteen years like clockwork. Literally it's the easy credit inflationary business cycle Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, Friedman, etc., all warned us about.
As long a fiat currency has its value debased people with money have no choice but to use property as a store of value.
The loans used to buy housing at increased prices are the money created that causes inflation. Govt debt is mostly used as reserve for central and private rather than increased leverage that creates inflation
Nope.
Bidens first success was increasing the minimum wage substantially.
price inflation always follows wage inflation. You can ask Maduro in Venezuela. He has raised the minimum wage hundreds of times. The people are poorer than ever.
So why limit the store of value?
As long as there are property taxes you don't own your home
Ain’t that the truth.
Most peoples mortgage interest deduction was abolished with the doubling of the tax exemption for trump tax cuts....
It's actually near impossible to get rid of mortgage interest deduction in our tax system. There's no real difference between deducting interest expense that is corporate v landlord investor v owner-occupied. We hugely favor debt capital v equity capital. And we allow debt interest to shelter income that has nothing to do with that debt.
I'm also there. I'm not comfortable viewing my house primarily as an investment. I think this has had a lot of interesting downstream effects over time. Not the least of which is a thing I see now of people afraid to do things to their house out of fear of it changing sellability at some unknown point of the future. I think this might be what leads to cookie cutter houses and the ever increasing HOA presence.
Been saying this forever too.
Universal home ownership or home ownership as a means to build wealth. Ideally .gov would pick neither and stay out of it, but I'd they insist on meddling the least they could do is not try to force both
"D.C. is certainly an expensive place to buy a home."
Ironically, this isn't going to make it any cheaper!
I understand the desire to give other people's money away. I don't agree with it, I just understand it.
What I do NOT understand is why everyone who wants to give away other people's money is sways and invariably oblivious to the idea that giving other people's money away has consequences. Wholly ignorant on the basic economics.
If you want to help the poor by making housing affordable, why are you pursuing activities that are guaranteed to raise home prices?
These people in their Upper Middle Class Karen Bubbles have no conception whatsoever how reality works.
If you want to help the poor by making housing affordable, why are you pursuing activities that are guaranteed to raise home prices?
It's quite simple really.
1. Everyone should have THING!
2. THING costs $100!
3. There are ten people who need THING!
4. All you need to do is find $1000 and then give each person $100 and now everyone can buy THING!
That's really it. That's the extent of the logic. I'm definitely not saying it's sound logic. It's pants on head retarded, but that's the logic being used.
Yup, that's the Upper Middle Class Karen Bubble in a nutshell. They can't conceive of anyone not having the same Upper Middle Class Karen Bubble lifestyle, so they try to ban everything else. Can't have tiny house or tiny apartments, all must be huge with generous setbacks. Less than 202,000 for a home? Inconceivable! must subsidize housing until all housing is above that price.
Homeownership, like a college education, high speed internet and a cell phone, is considered to be a basic right. That means it should be subsidized by government. Never mind the unintended consequences of these programs, we're talking about basic human rights here!
Something something Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Food and clothing issues covered, now we need to provide free houses (with generous footage and setbacks), free cellphones, and faster internet than the working middle class can afford (moar fibre!).
Didn't the Fed already try this with disastrous results?
Turns out free money is never really free.
Reminiscent of the Bushpigs:
https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/12/20031216-9.html
Dubya came up with a program to grant/give first time homebuyers $10,000 to cover their down payment.
Lies. Republicans never do that stuff. Ever.
Both sides?
Until around 2008, Republicans and Democrats were largely interchangeable. Then radical leftists took over the Democrats, and later, Republicans started kicking out the neocons and neoliberals.
So are you angry with this program or for this type of program?
So what you're saying is, this plan is more than 20 times worse that Dubya's plan.
There's another solution to DC home prices. Cut the size of the federal government drastically.
Even if the size of the federal government isn't cut, most of the federal bureaucracy should be distributed across all 50 states.
Stop replacing retirees. That would do wonders by itself.
what a bunch of communist bullshit this program is.
Completely immoral use of stolen money
Meanwhile, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser seems to be thinking: What if we did that for housing too?
Hold my Colt 45.
Seriously, Reason?
"Selling a Home? The D.C. Down Payment Assistance Program Will Give You Up to $202,000."
That is a lie.
They aren't giving you that money it is a loan that you have to pay back.
Don't do the bullshit that the main stream media does.
I'm glad you caught this, as I took this at face value.
it is a loan that you have to pay back.
But to steelman the premise, so was the student loan you took out.
The *seller* doesn't have to pay it back. And they're the ones getting the benefit, according to the article.
It's an interest free loan. That amounts to a taxpayer handout of about $190000 per "borrower".
And that's assuming that the borrower won't simply have the debt forgiven at some point. If the debt is forgiven, or there are payment holidays, this easily amounts to an even higher handout.
All those unvaccinated kids Bowser just kicked out of school are going to need someplace else to hang out all day, why not buy them a nice house?
"Selling a Home? The D.C. Down Payment Assistance Program Will Give You Up to $202,000."
Reason's kind of reason.
Of course, the money is for the buyer, not the seller, and it is a loan, not a gift, but at least it is DC, so one out of three.
An interest free loan on $200000 is a gift. At current rates, the value of that gift is about $190000, and taxpayers have to pay for that.
It's still a subsidy, as the loans are interest free. Also, how much you wanna bet the local gov. will enforce its lien rights (i.e., foreclose) if a bunch of borrowers fail to pay back the principal?
Whoops, meant to be a reply to Diane Reynolds (Paul.) above.
Hey, if Big Government can't give out endless bags of money to anyone they like, why even have one?
Seems like payments to a bunch of swamp creatures. Which party works in DC?
Voting for the approved candidate has its privileges:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-elections/district-of-columbia-president-results?amp=1
It may cost that much; it isn't worth that much to most people. In fact, most people don't want to live in DC at all.
So that young graduate from a top law school gets their first job making 125k (that is a real number) and gets 200k to buy their first home. Drives up home prices even more. The city is already a city of haves and have nots with no middle. It will be more so.