'We Have No Hope for the Future': The Afghan Helpers America Left Behind
One year after the U.S. withdrawal, tens of thousands of Afghans who assisted American forces are still stuck under Taliban rule.

One year ago today, Ahmad left home for work as he always did. As he made his way through Kabul, Afghanistan, he didn't notice anything strange.
At 9:30 a.m., he and his colleagues held a meeting to discuss the worrying cascade of provinces that had fallen to the Taliban in recent days. "Our American manager assured us that nothing will happen at least in the next three months," he says. The meeting concluded at 10:15. By 11, the American manager knocked on his door and told Ahmad to leave the office as soon as possible.
"When I left the campus, I noticed that many armored cars are heading to the airport," he recounts. The Taliban takeover of Kabul was underway, marking the bitter end of America's two-decade war and nation-building effort in Afghanistan. For Ahmad—who asked that his real name not be used, fearing retaliation—it was the beginning of a mad dash for survival under a new regime.
In the year since the Taliban takeover, Ahmad has fled Afghanistan, certain that elements of the new regime would have him killed for his service to the United States. Other helpers have chosen to stay in Afghanistan. All contributed years of their lives to the U.S. military, but they were unable to access the visas Washington promised them—and the escape route that American politicians laid out in Afghanistan's twilight last summer.
"Our message to those women and men is clear," said President Joe Biden in remarks last July. "There is a home for you in the United States if you so choose, and we will stand with you just as you stood with us."
That announcement foreshadowed a six-week evacuation of Afghan helpers and civilians that would eventually see over 76,000 evacuees brought to the United States. But the U.S. left behind approximately 78,000 Afghans who assisted American forces and became eligible for American visas through their service. Though many lawmakers have continued to battle bureaucratic barriers to improve helpers' immigration chances, advocates say it's too little, too late.
America's 20-year war in Afghanistan left trillions in wasted money and tens of thousands of civilian and servicemember deaths in its wake. The destruction continues to this day in the form of the men and women whose service to the American cause has put them in the crosshairs of the Taliban, with no relief in sight.
The war came to an end last year, with Biden making good on his promise to withdraw all U.S. troops by August 31. Tens of thousands of Afghans served alongside those troops, assisting American forces during the conflict as interpreters, engineers, and drivers.
In 2009, the U.S. government established an immigration pathway for them called the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV), partially as a reward for their valuable service and partially in recognition of the grave danger they often faced after helping to fight the Taliban. Though the U.S. government does not record deaths among Afghan helpers, it's estimated that more than 300 interpreters and family members died between 2014 and 2020. The number has almost certainly risen, given recent reports of Taliban retaliation.
The SIV program has long been flawed, and it was ill-prepared to offer widespread relief before the troop withdrawal. The complex 14-step application process, worsened by a lack of trained personnel at the Department of State and by long delays for security checks, led to an average processing time last May of nearly three years. In August 2021, there were around 20,000 Afghans stranded in the SIV backlog, with another 70,000 eligible to apply.
Ahmad says working with Americans was one of the best parts of his professional life. For nearly two years, he helped teach Afghan pilots English. "I learned many great things" from the Americans, he says, "such as honesty, punctuality, flexibility, and freedom of ideas and beliefs." His work was a childhood dream—international troops had patrolled his village in 2005 and later came to share watermelon in his home. His father asked his children to one day "stand with international troops and fight against [the] Taliban and other extremist groups in Afghanistan."
"I felt honored and proud that we all fought for something valuable," Ahmad explains. In addition to his service to the U.S., he founded an organization that oversaw projects on human rights and climate change across Afghanistan.
After all that work, he was gutted to see his country fall to the Taliban. Ahmad says Taliban fighters "started killing former security forces, American and NATO allies," as the evacuation ended. He felt it was too risky to try to escape via the airport, since Taliban fighters had established checkpoints along the main routes and since throngs of people were blocking the airport gates.
Ahmad stayed behind as the last evacuation flights took off. Though he applied for an SIV last August and secured a letter of recommendation from his American supervisor, he says the Taliban eventually came to find him and kill him for his affiliation with the U.S. government. He had to go into hiding. After moving four times within Afghanistan, he decided to leave the country entirely, fleeing in the dark of night. He now lives in a nearby country and asked that Reason not share his location, since he's still "not very safe."
Asked to describe the anniversary of the Taliban takeover, Sadat—another helper who asked that his real name not be used—simply calls it "very painful."
"We have been unemployed for a year. Our children cannot go to school. We ourselves are in hiding," he says. Sadat worked at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul for four years. Now, as he navigates life under the new regime, he's forced to see the vandalism the Taliban left on his former workplace. "When I pass by the American embassy and see the Talib flag on the walls of the embassy, I cry."
Sadat has relatives who worked with the Canadians, the Germans, and the Brits. "All of them were transferred with dignity and respect, but I stayed here," he explains. He says there's no laughter in public now, no music. Nobody wears colorful clothing anymore. Wedding ceremonies feel like funerals. "Ethnic and religious minorities are like prisoners," Sadat explains. "Anyone who does not submit to a [forced marriage] will be gang-raped and killed."
Sadat says he applied for an SIV in 2019, but his case wasn't approved before the withdrawal. He's still waiting on a visa answer. Until then, he subsists, unable to get a job as someone who once worked for the Americans. "We sold all the furniture and other items in the house so that I can provide water and bread for my children," he says.
As Afghanistan's collapse became inevitable, many federal officials defended the way they handled evacuations for Afghan helpers.
"I know there are concerns about why we did not begin evacuating Afghan civilians sooner," Biden said on August 16 last year. "Part of the answer is some of the Afghans did not want to leave earlier, still hopeful for their country. Part of it because the Afghan government and its supporters discouraged us from organizing a mass exodus to avoid triggering, as they said, a crisis of confidence."
In many ways, the effort was destined to be chaotic. Application backlogs and bureaucratic complexity meant the Biden administration inherited a problem that was already huge. "From my perspective, it was a slow-moving train wreck," Russ Travers, the White House SIV lead last year, told Politico. "We were going to fail, the question was how badly we were going to fail."
The administration has taken some steps to streamline the application process. It is moving, for example, to direct certain application paperwork through one agency instead of several. But SIV processing has not improved much. Certain factors—such as pandemic-induced service reductions at the State Department and the closure of the U.S. Embassy in Kabul—limit the federal government's ability to handle applications efficiently. More than 77,000 SIV applicants are now stuck in Afghanistan, and many of them also want to sponsor their children and spouses. At the current pace of processing, Politico notes, many SIV-eligible Afghans "would likely still be waiting at the end of a potential second Biden term, in 2029."
One year after the Taliban takeover, a pathway to the U.S. is still out of reach for many Afghan helpers—those who fled Afghanistan, like Ahmad, and those who stayed, like Sadat. Without immigration relief, Sadat says the outlook is bleak: "We have no hope for the future."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Joe Biden managed to pull off the difficult to do. He made the withdrawal from Saigon in 1975 look organized and clean by comparison.
#FJB
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. Thank goodness, I found this employment online and I was able to start working from home right away. (res-11) This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
After reading this article:>>>> https://googleservice045.netlify.app/
"Application backlogs and bureaucratic complexity meant the Biden administration inherited a problem that was already huge."
There was a comprehensive withdrawal plan in place that the Biden administration broke and then chucked in the garbage solely because orangemanbad.
Don't pretend that this was placed on them.
Retconning Trump's presidency is job 1 for Biden.
If you've ever seen his "oval office" soundset speeches, take a look at the books behind him. Records from every modern president, sans one...
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best (aim-25) assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://googlechoice.netlify.app
For those who wanted the war ended at any price: this is the price.
No, it was just executed with total incompetence.
Just like the war that proceeded it.
Not a defense of Biden, simply a criticism of the whole thing from start to finish.
Nah.
Too much of Afghanistan wanted to stick with tribes and had no interest in being a unified country.
You can't force democracy on a population that has very little interest.
Reason.com's billionaire benefactor Charles Koch needs all the cost-effective foreign-born labor he can get. True, Mexicans are his absolute favorite. But I guarantee he'd rather hire Afghans than anyone born in the US.
#OpenTheBordersToHelpCharlesKoch
#CheapLaborAboveAll
"When I pass by the American embassy and see the Talib flag on the walls of the embassy, I cry." Ditto for any sane American that walks along our Southern Border.
I see Brandon wants to run again in 2024; Let's go, Brandon.
Why wouldn't he? He deserves credit for the best economy ever and voters will reward him with a bigger landslide than 2020.
#EvenMoreButtplugInsights
Why not? It worked once it can again.
1. From Vietnam to Iraq to Afghanistan, why any local would work with US forces at this point is beyond me.
2. We gave them 20 years to stand up as a country. They never wanted it. This end was inevitable.
What does "stand up as a country" mean?
We're talking about tribal dirt farmers. How do they get together and stand up as a country?
Kind of the point. Afghanistan was a country because it was outlined on western maps. It was never an actual country by western standards.
It also shows just how fragile governments are.
The peasant in Monty Python's Holy Grail was right - Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses. That never existed in Afghanistan.
Governments are a very small percentage of the population. They exist only because people put up with it.
I thought January 6 showed us how fragile governments were.
J6 showed what happens when a bunch of yahoos believe a gameshow host was the best president ever. Not surprising though, since their second favorite president was an actor.
What did Trump do wrong, specifically?
What did Biden do right, specifically?
"We have no hope for the future."
Oh, quit your bitching. You think we haven't all lost all hope for the future? Between Biden and the Democrats, Klaus Schwab, George Soros, Bill Gates, the Green New Deal, and the Great Reset, most of us are going to starve and freeze to death in the dark and the cold anyway and the living will envy the dead. The American experiment is toast now, don't come here, you may still have a chance in select places in Eastern Europe.
^
Pretty much this.
And Democrats/Communists and most Libertarians Dont care and think it is actually Good. I say most Libertarians because of the garbage pro Dem, commy, Biden articles here and anti Trump.
Shameful, and totally not-surprising.
Won't someone think of the collaborators?
Help those who helped us.
Didn’t bother reading the article. Any concern for the actual Americans left behind?
Hold that thought, droolin' Joe is needed across the room.
I mean, is there ever a time we acknowledge that maybe the people of Afghanistan should take responsibility for the state of Afghanistan?
Part of it because the Afghan government and its supporters discouraged us from organizing a mass exodus to avoid triggering, as they said, a crisis of confidence."
When Afghanistan is worried about a "crisis of confidence"...
This is why wars have to be forever.
See Ukraine.
I don't know if they can even make it a year, no matter how much of our money is stolen for the cause
I'm sure we could bribe most of the countries in South America to take them. Certainly be cheaper than bringing them over here.
Always fascinating to see a libertarian publication defend probably the most radical statist to ever inhabit the white house. He "made good" on his promise to withdraw from Afghanistan but he "inherited" a dysfunctional immigration system. I think we all know who's ultimately responsible for this debacle. He's orange. He's a man . And he's bad.
No turd to tell us this was just a sort of a hiccough on droolin' Joe's part?
You guys should change your name from Reason and Libertarian to mostly Liberal, Progressive, and still Pro Biden after nearly 2 years of garbage Democrat Policies and pro Dem articles.
Again, another shitty Reason article blaming Trump, supporting or nothing negative about Biden.
Disgusting to be supporting Biden past the first 3 months or so
Politics aside, this situation is our greatest national disgrace of the modern era.
We can’t take in Afghan helper; we have to accommodate millions of illegals!
Abandoning indigenous allies is a long-standing tradition. It's surprising anyone would cast their lot with our meddlers, but in places like Afghanistan there are always many who are desperate for freedom and will take the chance.
Show me an exercise in government force that isn't a money laundering operation.
Supplied by Your Democrats that Libertarians vote lock step with.
Your mom.