Review: Rosewood Restrictions Riled U.S. Guitar Makers
In 2017, a bizarre amendment to an international treaty threw American guitar makers into a panic.

In 2017, an amendment to an international treaty threw American guitar makers into a panic. In order to stop the overharvesting of rosewood for use in Chinese furniture, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) was updated to impose permit requirements for all 183 treaty member states on all international movement of all products containing any amount of rosewood. Rosewood crossing borders without such a permit was now contraband.
U.S. guitar manufacturers, whose product lines prior to this often contained small amounts of the wood (which instrument makers love for its natural oils, stunning dark grain, and historical importance), worried about the legality of shipping instruments to countries where it had been perfectly fine to do so just months before. Retailers, buyers, and traveling musicians now had to fret about guitars being seized in global transit.
The answer to these concerns, CITES advocates said, was simple: Just get the permit. But the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was inundated with CITES permit applications, and agency turnaround times stretched for months. American guitar exports plummeted—28 percent for acoustics and 23 percent for electrics, according to Music Trades magazine.
Manufacturers, many of them preservationists, were distraught. "We have orders for the guitars. We have customers. The customers have the money to pay for them, and we can't ship them because the paperwork is stuck somewhere," Chris Martin, chairman and CEO of C.F. Martin & Co., told the Associated Press in April 2018.
After nearly two years of compliance confusion and major losses by instrument companies, the U.N. in October 2019 announced that CITES had been amended once again, this time to exempt finished musical instruments containing rosewood—minus Brazilian rosewood, banned since 1992—from the treaty requirements.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Rosewood."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In order to stop the overharvesting of rosewood for use in Chinese furniture, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) was updated to impose permit requirements for all 183 treaty member states on all international movement of all products containing any amount of rosewood. Rosewood crossing borders without such a permit was now contraband.
Is China still exporting rosewood furniture?
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even (vst-20) realizable but my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. Thank goodness, I found this employment online and I was able to start working from home right away. (res-06) This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
After reading this article ……… https://brilliantfuture01.pages.dev
It wasn't for export. It was becoming a "thing" in the Chinese new middle and upper middle class. All domestic sales.
Of course, the real thing of this is that it caused untold mayhem amongst ... everyone. Customs HATED it, it was a nightmare of paperwork for them to no good end. Musicians hated it. Orchestras ALL have "banned" woods somewhere in their group, even though it is often on instruments centuries old. It really sucked.
Yet China doesn't give a shit. They're more than happy to ignore cites for domestic production, always have been.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even (abt-16) realisable but my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay241.blogspot.com
Retailers, buyers, and traveling musicians now had to fret about guitars being seized in global transit.
I see what you did there
Hopefully CITES will reconsider this binding ruling.
They will just string you along. Make a note of that.
You're just picking on them.
It's ridiculous on it's FACE.
How do you prove your 1958 Gibson is not Brazilian rosewood?
Because it's a 1958? Probably only applies to post 1992 rosewood.
Just ask it how it identifies.
U.S. guitar manufacturers, whose product lines prior to this often contained small amounts of the wood (which instrument makers love for its natural oils, stunning dark grain, and historical importance)
It’s typically the entire back and sides of the guitar, and it’s coveted for the sound in acoustics, especially the Brazilian variety, which is ridiculously expensive due to reasons mentioned in the article.
It's a massive reduction in trade. The Trumpistas should be thrilled.
""Review: Rosewood Restrictions Riled U.S. Guitar Makers""
I'm pretty sure it was how Gibson guitars was treated by the feds that riled other guitar makers.
""The guitar maker will also have to make a "community service payment" of $50,000 to the U.S. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation to promote conservation and development of tree species used in making musical instruments.""
https://money.cnn.com/2012/08/06/news/companies/gibson-imports-wood/index.htm
Were we not just talking about how government is using the DOJ actions as a source of revenue.
Completely different clusterfuck.
Gibson was dealing with the german arm of LMII (luthier's mercantile) who had run some stuff out of India... it was pretty much a political hit job from Obama's justice department. Every major manufacturer has import issues sourcing wood, everyone major or minor deals with an intermediary like LMII at some stage or other, yet the only guitar company run by a vocal Republican is the one that got hit on very spurious means -- they were enforcing some Indian law that Gibson had no knowledge or control over as they'd bought through the German intermediary.
The law in India is protectionist. You can't export unless it's "finished" wood, so when you buy something like a fretboard blank from them they'll sell it cut to size and milled on one side or something so they have put some work into it. India decided what they'd done to some exports wasn't enough and the US tried to make Gibson an example.
tl:dr Fuck the Lacy act and fuck Governments using shit like that to punish political foes
Time for some genetic engineering in the world of guitar woods.
First they came for the guitar makers, and I was silent - - - - - -
Why is this a story in 2022? Was this corrected in 2019 as the article states or not?