ICE Set Up a Fake College, Robbing and Deporting Foreign Students. Civil Rights Groups Want Answers.
Hundreds of lives were upended by the University of Farmington, a fake university that took $6 million in tuition and fees from foreign students.

The University of Farmington had many of the markings of a real college. It advertised over 20 undergraduate and graduate programs, claiming to be fully accredited and authorized to enroll international students. It reported that 98 percent of students were working full time in their fields of study. It even detailed a history dating back to the early 1950s.
By the time the University of Farmington closed in 2019, students had paid it $6 million in tuition and fees—and many were left stripped of their immigration status, stuck in detention, or deported. It was revealed in January 2019 that Farmington was a fake school set up by a branch of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to "investigate a complex fraud scheme" in the student visa system.
But critics say the ICE sting amounted to "entrapment." On Tuesday, immigration advocates and civil rights activists from over 40 groups sent a letter to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) calling for a federal investigation into the University of Farmington. "The students were detained, and many were placed in removal proceedings in Immigration Court or left the country in fear," the letter explains. "One of the students was awakened in the middle of the night by ICE agents and taken into custody for 45 days without any advance notice."
In their attempt to crack down on visa fraud, federal agents ended up creating an apparatus that was fraudulent to its core. Agents ran the University of Farmington for four years, attracting around 600 students in that time. The school advertised certification by the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), indicating to students that it was recognized by ICE as a valid institution. Lawyers representing the affected students say the university "established a physical address, maintained a professional website, issued offers of acceptance, accepted tuition payments, and mailed students I-20 Certificate of Eligibility for Nonimmigrant Student Status."
Government officials have stated that students claimed to be legitimate, full-time attendees despite knowing that wasn't the case, but former Farmington students maintain that they "were unwitting victims" of the sting. It's undeniable that federal agents employed extreme, deceptive tactics to ensnare foreigners who hoped to study and build lives in the United States. There was even a cruel undercurrent to the way the sting was revealed on social media: The Detroit News reported that after it broke early news about the case, "the university's Facebook page started featuring memes," including one that featured the Star Wars character Admiral Ackbar shouting "It's a trap."
Last year, Reason's Billy Binion interviewed a former Farmington student who was forced to leave the U.S. once ICE revealed the sting. Suraj—name changed to protect his identity—paid Farmington $15,000 in tuition and fees, money he never got back from the government. He opted to leave the country of his own accord, hoping to maximize his chances of a successful return in the future.
Like all but one of the targeted students, Suraj is from India. "The sense I got was that there's some anti-Indian bias at ICE, where they felt that Indian people in general were taking advantage of the student visa program," Suraj's attorney, Anna Nathanson, told Binion. "I don't know why the response to that is to make a university which looks totally legitimate, and have people pretextually violate the visa program."
This week's letter also points to the curious nationality breakdown of affected students, arguing that ICE targeted students for their national origin. "Indian students…were eventually detained without due process," the letter reads. Far from serious offenders who deserved harsh punishment, the ensnared students came to the U.S. legally on valid student visas. According to an anonymous former Farmington student, "International students who were mostly from humble backgrounds and vulnerable because of the broken immigration system, were preyed upon by the government."
Whatever the results of this week's letter, the damage has been done. Lives have been disrupted, taxpayer dollars have been wasted, and a deceitful government scheme has put yet another dark mark on the country's immigration agencies.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We seem to do this story every few months.
Immigranrs use fake online colleges to extend student visas illegally. They are choosing to violate the law. It isnt entrapment.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even (abt-02) realisable but my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay241.blogspot.com
" It isnt entrapment."
It is when the government creates a fake university of it's own.
It's not entrapment unless you coerce people to commit crimes that they wouldn't have otherwise committed.
The main thing that concerns me is that they advertised accreditation. This isn't just putting an ad out for "quick online diplomas". Could people apply there actually thinking they will be getting an education? Then they are stuck, since they cannot get into another school in time for the school year and have no way out.
they really did pay to build the wall!
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realizable but my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
Hundreds of lives were upended by the University of Farmington, a fake university that took $6 million in tuition and fees from foreign students.
There's a joke in here about the "value" of real colleges... I'll let someone else make it.
Somebody check my Reasoning here: If I were to set up a sort of study abroad or exchange program whereby immigrants pay $15,000 to escape an looming oppressive dictatorships and convert their lifetime earning potential from pesos to dollars and I escape the looming oppression of everyone else's student loan debt and convert my lifetime earning potential to European sports cars, underwear models, and Spanish revival mansions, it would be OK as long as everyone actually got diplomas?
I mean, I'm OK with it, I just want to be sure that's the deal that Reason is putting forth honestly and not hiding any true intentions behind a facade of moral, ethnic, and globalist righteousness.
Lawyers representing the affected students say the university "established a physical address, maintained a professional website, issued offers of acceptance, accepted tuition payments, and mailed students I-20 Certificate of Eligibility for Nonimmigrant Student Status."
Government officials have stated that students claimed to be legitimate, full-time attendees despite knowing that wasn't the case, but former Farmington students maintain that they "were unwitting victims" of the sting. It's undeniable that federal agents employed extreme, deceptive tactics to ensnare foreigners who hoped to study and build lives in the United States.
Wait a minute. This feels like we're stealing a base here.
Maybe they did, maybe they didn't.
They may be in fact a dubious entrapment scheme. But depending on how it was run, what the students expected and how they behaved after enrolling in this college would tell us a lot more about whether or not this type of sting operation was legitimate.
For instance, I could well easily see a situation where a fake institution was set up that was a no-bs student visa mill would take money from students, give them a student visa, never expect anyone to show up for classes with both parties well aware of what the situation was.
Essentially, the university could act as a kind of "mule" to get students and keep them in the country illegally. Basically, unregulated capitalism at work. I'll pay you $15,000, you give me a student Visa, and then I go on about my way with legal cover.
Yep. Didn’t get many complaints about the lack of schoolwork.
The story seems really bereft of details. Four years... did any student at any time wonder why they weren't attending classes? Did any student not inquire about the status of his or her degree? Or did they absolutely know what the deal was?
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. Thank goodness, I found this employment online and I was able to start working from home right away. (res-04)This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
After reading this article:>>>> https://googleservice045.netlify.app/
Goostosee alumni of this college putting in their support.
Obligatory joke about the "value" of real colleges: You're supposed to show up for class?
Of course the reporting is incomplete. The details likely destroy Reason’s ‘open borders at any cost’ narrative.
Well, let's see.
Seems like it's somewhere in between here. After a semester of no classes, being told that the lack of classes "would not be an issue" isn't something that someone actually trying to get an education (as opposed to someone merely trying to stay in the country) would accept.
What are the possibilities here? Either Ravi was legitimately trying to find out what was going on, or to create a paper trail as an alibi.
What else do you do in such a situation if you're legit? You're out the money and you've wasted time that you might've spent getting into another choice of school if you could even afford it. Do you retain hope that you'll eventually be made good on your investment? Do you just assume you've been duped and leave the country?
A police report or lawsuit would be a good start. If someone scammed me out of a five digit sum and had an identifiable location, you bet that they would hear from the police first and my lawyer second.
Please note, this is their press release. Yet they say that he called three times at the end of the first year after attending no classes. Four documented contacts over the course of a year? If I had no class schedule when school was supposed to start, I would have called that many times in a single day.
If their own presentation can't even begin to convince me that the "student" didn't know it was a scam, then I really don't know what to say.
“Winston University. If you tell anyone, we will find you and we will kill you.”
I remember that sketch. Back when SNL was funny.
Wait, stopped in 2019? Trump stopped it? Which administration started it? Should we just assume Trump was in charge when this started? Dates would be helpful in this story. Without this info, how can partisans partisan?
Wikipedia says it started in 2015, so during Obama.
Not the best source, but one heavily listing to port, so if no one's griping about Obo's involvement, it's probably good.
So it was started under Obama and ended under Trump. Just like the kids in cages thing.
Good thing Reason's been sticking to the narrative or I might start believing the wrong sort of things.
I dunno bro, Obama would never penalize or deport potential democrat voters, Alex Jones told me so
IDK, sounds like it was mostly hardworking Asians with large amounts of cash, not exactly at the top of the "Potential Democratic Voters" must-recruit list.
So the FBI isn't the only false-flag operator?
Patriot Front University
Hoping the WSJ does something on the unsealed warrants; very few news sources are by now believable.
I do find it surprising that the swamp was/is so fragile that the election of a single non-swamp critter could cause the total implosion of the swamp's networks; it seems everyone is threatened existentially and is fighting back with every bit of ammunition they can find.
It suggests a certain panic on the swamp critters' part, but also a willingness to use whatever coercive forces the assholes have available; that is not something we want to see.
It might take a re-election of Trump to effect a peaceful change; right now, the options are not attractive.
I’m curious to know what happened every time someone not being targeted (such as a student who is clearly a citizen) would apply. I get it that the fake university probably advertised to Indian students, but it’s hard to guarantee no non-foreigners will ever see a particular ad.
That's a really good question that I don't recall was answered in HyR's previous reporting on the story. For one thing, how could they be sure the citizen was one? I wouldn't be surprised if they just took everyone's money and ran.
Maybe they just denied admission to non-foreign students.
Any word about the FBI setting up a fake insurrection?
"The protesters are all traitorous insurrectionists!"
Also;
"Don't be mean to Ray Epps. He was just an ordinary protester!"
If the college was fake, why does this article repeatedly refer to the duped individuals as "students"?
College is such a racket, all students should be referred to as "students" with the doubt quotes.
The pre-lawsuit story was reported on here about 3 years ago, but we still don't know more in any particular case what the students knew or when they knew it. Some may have been defrauded, others merely playing along with what they expected. And then it's a matter of what you believe they believed in each case. Pretty frustrating.
The most frustrating thing is that the targeted person doesn't have to do anything but remain in the country. There's no additional or ongoing action that person has to take to be considered actively part of a conspiracy. So somebody takes your money and evades further inquiry; at what point should you be considered a willing participant in the scam rather than a victim of it? What could any of the admitted students have done to make themselves not be part of the scam? Swallow the loss and apply elsewhere?
Most similar scams, wherein someone is, for instance, hired as a repackaging mule or laundering fraudulent financial instruments unwittingly, at least require ongoing action by the sucker in the middle, who may be guilty of not being suspicious enough. I don't know how many of those people are even criminally prosecuted. Hard to prove mens rea. But there's no such standard in one of these immigration cases, because it's a matter of getting someone out of the country who doesn't have a right to remain, not a crime.
That is the main point of the matter, the rest is fluff and distraction.
I would definitely say that after attending no classes for a year, paying a second year of tuition would be sufficient to convince me they were active participants.
I would consider good faith effort on the student's part such as
1- getting into another school
2- reporting the scam to the police
3- threats of lawsuits
4- complaints to third parties, such as public shaming of the school as a scam
I congratulate ICE on their ingenuity.
It the “students” knew it was a scam to stay in the USA.
Simple explanation. ICE was convinced there were a lot of Indians scamming the student visa game.
So they set up a fake school and offered fake documents. But no one bought them.
Rather than admit there wasn’t a huge network of fake students, they started entrapping students to justify their budget.
Everyone involved in managing this sting should go to jail.
Well, ICE helpfully provided hidden video of prospective "students" being briefed on the fact that there were no classes for them, and that what they were seeking was illegal.
It is pretty clear that they were completely aware that they were paying for fake documentation in order to extend their visas.
You got a link. Because what you are saying backs up my suspicion about how this was actually run, and that Reason is intentionally leaving out details because it undermines the innocent victim narrative.
https://www.ice.gov/doclib/video/gallery/farmington.mp4
Reason will ignore just about anything if it covers for the poor illegal aliens.
Thanks. That's what I figured. Harrigan is shamelessly shilling for illegal alien criminals.
I still don't get the logic behind advocating for open borders. Beyond the idea that no first world country can survive an influx of potentially hundreds of millions of mostly unskilled and illiterate people.
So, when I was in college in Texas, one of my good friends, a smart, beautiful and motivated young woman, was kidnapped from the parking lot. Turns out that they guy who did it was a Mexican serial rapist who came north because in our community, young women think they are safe, and don't take the sorts of precautions they would in his home country.
So he kidnapped her, raped and tortured her for a few days, then dumped her body in a roadside ditch.
Just keeping people like that out is good enough reason to try to keep borders secure.
Most of us here don't have bars welded over our windows or walls around our houses topped with broken glass set in cement. I don't want to live like that, but that is normal for most people in the world. With open borders, you don't just get the people who want to live a life without those bars and jagged glass. You also bring the people those measures were used to defend against.
I'm not at all bothered by this tactic, and it is most certainly not "entrapment".
Obvious entrapment. And they need to return all that tuition. This is the life savings of low income, hardworking parents in India.
Well, I didn't quite see anything fundamentally wrong with the sting, IF it targets only visa frauds.
What of the legitimate students who just wanted an education? And paid a shtload of tuition money for it?
There are a lot of details missing from this article, feels a bit spun.
Fabulous ICE! Keep up the good work
This article is so laughably vague when it comes to the specifics of what the students were doing wrong -- I assume getting enrolled in a college they never had to attend -- that I can only assume they got what they deserved.
And maybe it's not an anti-Indian bias, it's just that Indians perpetrate this scam a lot, just like it's not anti-black bias that so many murderers turn out to be black.
Sting examples:
Offering free sports or airline tickets to lure fugitives out of hiding.[5]
Deploying a bait car (also called a honey trap) to catch a car thief
Setting up a seemingly vulnerable honeypot computer to lure and gain information about hackers
Arranging for someone under the legal drinking age to ask an adult to buy an alcoholic beverage or tobacco products for them[6]
Passing off weapons or explosives (whether fake or real), to a would-be terrorist
Posing as:
someone who is seeking illegal drugs, contraband, or child pornography, to catch a supplier (or as a supplier to catch a customer)
a child in a chat room to identify a potential online child predator
a potential customer of illegal prostitution, or as a prostitute to catch a would-be customer
a hitman to catch customers and solicitors of murder-for-hire; or as a customer to catch a hitman
a spectator of an illegal dogfighting ring
a documentary film crew to lure a pirate to the country where a crime was committed.
I'm not really sure how a potential student is supposed to know, up front, that this is a visa scam. It would seem entirely possible that a student could see the website, find a program that interested them, apply to the school (usually costs a hefty application fee), and then, if admitted pay $$$ for tuition.
At what point are they supposed to have detected that this is a scam? And, if they have already tossed their money into this scam, how will they pay for school at a legitimate institution?
Perhaps the article left those details out.
Bad article! Who started this mess? Name some names. Dates. Locations. Anything. Say who in government did this, or stop rehashing what we know. Or both.