Dr. Seuss' Books Gained Popularity After They Were Removed
And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street and other titles shot up Amazon's bestseller list after being self-censored by Dr. Seuss Enterprises.

And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street (1937) wasn't just the first book Theodor Geisel published as Dr. Seuss. It was among the six titles his literary estate ceased publishing and licensing last year because they "portray people in ways that are hurtful and wrong."
The volume is narrated by young Marco, whose father upbraids him for embroidering his humdrum life: "Stop telling such outlandish tales. Stop turning minnows into whales." But the boy can't help it, and, as he walks home from school, he pretends a "broken-down wagon that's drawn by a horse" is an increasingly fantastical procession, including an elephant driven by a "rajah" with a brass band in tow and, alas, "a Chinaman who eats with sticks." In a 1978 update, that last figure becomes "a Chinese man," his pigtail and ostentatiously yellow coloring removed.
Voluntarily ceasing to publish titles is not censorship, to be sure. No threat of government action prompted Dr. Seuss Enterprises' decision—just a grim consultation "with a panel of experts, including educators." But rather than rid the world of offensive books, the decision effectively ginned up interest in these obscure, forgotten works.
The Associated Press reported that in the week after the announcement that And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street, If I Ran the Zoo, McElligot's Pool, On Beyond Zebra!, Scrambled Eggs Super!, and The Cat's Quizzer were being pulled, Dr. Seuss titles racked up 1.2 million in copies sold and accounted for "virtually every book in the top 20 on Amazon's bestseller list." Major public library systems removed the books, and online retailers such as eBay banned the selling of used copies, whose prices skyrocketed into the hundreds of dollars for items that had been collecting dust. According to The New York Times, only And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street had sold enough copies in the years prior to scrape the lower reaches of BookScan's annual point-of-sale tallies.
Now, all the titles remain easy to find for sale online—on Amazon and elsewhere. First editions still command premium prices while foreign and revised editions are resold at prices comparable to other similar, used titles. All are available to view and download as PDFs at various free websites too.
At the close of And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street, Marco's dad asks him what he saw on the way home from school. "Nothing," he replies, "growing red as a beet, but a plain horse and wagon on Mulberry Street." The whale is once again a minnow. We can all empathize.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Maybe self-censorship isn't enough. Maybe government force is necessary.
According to Reason contributor Noah Berlatsky, the government should have the power to ban racist speech. And although my professors never actually made us read Dr. Seuss's work, they assured us it was in fact racist.
#AntiRacism101
#BringBackBerlatsky
except to protect them i suppose - because i guess he actually DID come for the children
????
Slow down, Einstein. Dr. Seuss in college? Let's not overdue the advanced metaphysics for already struggling American students.
Yeah, Berlatsky is a fucking idiot:
He goes right to the racists to figure out how we should fight racists..
"Hey, let me get the inventors of Critical Theories on the phone. They'll have some sober insights."
So.. is the point of the article that people worried about grooming schoolkids should allow it or otherwise the grooming materials will only sell more on amazon?
Sort of like Obi-wan only coming back stronger after Darth subdivides him?
The only diff being - Obi wouldn't be coming for Darth's children.
except to protect them i suppose - because i guess he actually DID come for the children
that quad ? was actually an emoti that didnt make the cut.
(in the mis-positioned comment)
I think the point of the article is that there's a ton of people who are just assholes. Who won't read a book until after a publisher withdraws their own publication for their own reasons. And who will then buy the book in order to score their own political points and pretend that the world is about to cancel them and kill their kids.
Kind of like waiting until people die in order to pretend that the dead support you with thoughts/ideas that can't be challenged because they're dead
I doubt there are many people with the same convoluted thought process that you appear to have.
Probably not. But apparently they all buy out of print books by Dr Seuss
Or other reasons, like (gasp) profiteers who want to make a buck flipping some faddish items. Or people who might want to see the "controversy" for themselves.
But you are otherwise so right: anyone who questions mob censorship is an asshole.
Or people might remember the books from childhood and want to preserve copies for future generations to enjoy. Or they are just curious what all the fuss is about. Or are contrarian and want whatever it is that other people don't want them to have. Lots of reasons besides being an asshole.
Who won't read a book until after a publisher withdraws their own publication for their own reasons.
Enough about Chaco Taco.
More like they loved these books as children and even as aunts and uncles, and the thought that they might not be able to get hold of a copy in future makes want to invest in one for the future children in their lives.
Dude, have you seen Star Wars?
Obi-wan absolutely comes for Darth Vader’s children. He takes advantage of poor young Luke in his time of grief and convinces him to join a hokey and discredited religion, and he even demands that he accept Obi-wan’s “lightsaber.”
The groomers are calling, and they are always inside the house.
Beware; beware!
Already inside the house.
Not that easy - Ebay blocks sales of these books, although you can find some of them if you instead of searching by titles you search by "banned Dr Seuss". Amazon did block them for awhile, now they have either relented, or they just aren't enforcing their ban at the moment, but they could bring that back at any time.
So what is worse? Hypersensitive people who claim that any disagreeable experience is tantamount to death? Or squishy enablers who condone and coddle the whiners?
So my best friend in elementary school grew up in the apartment above his dad's Chinese restaurant. His dad who barely learned to speak English.
And now at age 60 he loves telling ethnic Chinese jokes. Stuff I would never tell myself unless drunk off my gourd.
The idea that Mulberry Street is offensive to all Chinese people is bullshit. The offensiveness is in the eye of the beholder.
But the purpose of progressives and genteel Democrats is to get offended for other people (especially from their pet demographic groups).
Their purpose is to run in front of parades so they complain that the parade is out of step with them.
I’ve noticed something about lists of banned books. Somehow such lists never include MEIN KAMPF or THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION. I don’t think the State should have the power to ‘ban’ anything, although I would argue that the State SHOULD encourage people libeled to sue, regardless of their celebrity. But there are some book - not Seuss’s - that are vile enough that it needs THOUGHT not just self-congratulatory smirking.
I checked Mein Kampf out of the local library as a kid, gave up trying to read it because of the language, describing people as filthy vile vermin which has always seemed so weird. I chalked it up to weird translation or something. Never did figure out why anyone would have actually read it. If it had been banned, I never would have known what an incomprehensible book it was, might have thought Hitler was actually smart or something.
Hitler was probably the most skillful demagogue of the 20th century, with the possible exception of Mao. He was hopelessly incompetent at economics (like all of his fellow lefturds) and military strategy and tactics.
The Brits passed on several plans to assassinate him because it was better for the allies if he stayed in power instead of being replaced by a competent wartime commander.
-jcr
In Germany they do. And they are actually banned, not just out of print.
You can get Mein Kampf in Germany, but it has to be an edition that includes lengthy analysis and criticism. It's also legal to possess, but not to sell, an original printing from the Nazi regime.
-jcr
So the Anarchists Cookbook is actually banned. Literally banned. And does sometimes make it onto these lists. But never celebrated in banned book week. Only books that have been curated off the limited school library shelves seem to get celebrated as banned.
I don't think that's true. Seems to be readily available from Amazon.
That's because Mein Kampf is a blueprint for the socialist paradise that the lefturds all want.
-jcr
"with a panel of experts, including educators."
Translation - a group of proggies threatening cancelation.
All of whom are government dependent for their income, but the government totally didn't influence this bro, cause it was experts. Not bureaucrats, experts damnit!
To be sure, it is censorship, and not self-censorship, as Dr Seuss is dead, and a bunch of dunderheads run his business and pulled this crap
Dr. Seuss taught millions of kids about accepting other people despite superficial differences (not to mention encouraging them to read and jump starting their imaginations). See "The Sneetches and Other Stories" for a great example.
Some of the drawings in some of the books are dated and might offend modern sensibilities (at least among the easily offended), but drawings could be easily updated.
The Sneetches is the kind of story that could only be told by someone sitting in a comfortable place of white privilege, as it champions objectively racist ideas of "color-blindness." Dr. Seuss's sentiments were generally on the left, so I would hope that if these flaws were pointed out to him, he would engage in self-criticism of his unconsciously reactionary works and agree that he needs to be sent to a people's commune in the countryside to engage in manual agricultural labor and "learn from the people."
(All future editions of And to Think that I Saw It on Mulberry Street" will show the Chinese man wearing a blue Mao suit and carrying a copy of the Little Red Book--purged, of course, of the preface by Lin Biao.)
Warning! The following may make your head explode.
https://notthebee.com/article/heres-what-you-do-if-the-atf-shows-up-at-your-door-asking-to-see-your-guns
What if they show up asking for your Seuss books?
hurtful and wrong is in the eye of the beholder.
A bit of the Streisand effect, I think.
If you were watching FOX News at the time, you'd think that Democratic politicians were responsible for censoring these books (and making Mr. Potato Head gender neutral).
Of course nothing's changed, except they're being slightly more honest about their wishes. DeSantis is outright punishing private companies for not being sufficiently bigoted.
Oh? How so, Tony Baloney?
Voluntarily ceasing to publish titles is not censorship, to be sure.
What garbage.
Self-censorship is definitely a thing, but this isn't even self-censorship. It's a group of woke ideologues who've gained control of Dr. Seuss Enterprises that are censoring him.
"the decision effectively ginned up interest in these obscure, forgotten works."
To claim that these books were ever obscure and forgotten is a flat out lie.
Mulberry Street is one of his better known books, I thought.
garbage yes. the opposite would be to publish twice as many, so self-censorship
Well, woke or not, Dr. Seuss Enterprises is under no obligation to publish things they don't agree with. Hard to see how it's censorship when all they've done has stopped printing them.
Really, the only censorious party here is eBay.
"Dr. Seuss Enterprises is under no obligation to publish things they don't agree with."
1. They're conservators, not publishers.
2. As the conservators of Geisel's estate they totally are obligated.
I suspect that you probably knew that.
They're definitely well remembered, and funnily enough, my Dad bought a copy of McElligot's Pool for my nephew for Christmas 2020, just 2.5 months before it was withdrawn from print. It was my favorite Seuss book as a child.
"Major public library systems removed the books"
Which might make things awkward during Banned Books Week.
Who am I kidding, they won't see any conflict, and anyone who points the inconsistency will be a right-wing fanatic and a whataboutist.
Banned Books Week (September 18-24, 2022) is an annual event celebrating the freedom to read. Typically held during the last week of September, it spotlights current and historical attempts to censor books in libraries and schools. It brings together the entire book community — librarians, booksellers, publishers, journalists, teachers, and readers of all types — in shared support of the freedom to seek and to express ideas, even those some consider unorthodox or unpopular.
This year's theme is "Books Unite Us. Censorship Divides Us." Sharing stories important to us means sharing a part of ourselves. Books reach across boundaries and build connections between readers. Censorship, on the other hand, creates barriers.
The books featured during Banned Books Week have all been targeted for removal or restriction in libraries and schools. By focusing on efforts across the country to remove or restrict access to books, Banned Books Week draws national attention to the harms of censorship.
https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/banned
Top 10 Most Challenged Books of 2021
The ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom tracked 729 challenges to library, school, and university materials and services in 2021. Of the 1597 books that were targeted, here are the most challenged, along with the reasons cited for censoring the books:
Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe
Reasons: Banned, challenged, and restricted for LGBTQIA+ content, and because it was considered to have sexually explicit images
Lawn Boy by Jonathan Evison
Reasons: Banned and challenged for LGBTQIA+ content and because it was considered to be sexually explicit
All Boys Aren’t Blue by George M. Johnson
Reasons: Banned and challenged for LGBTQIA+ content, profanity, and because it was considered to be sexually explicit
Out of Darkness by Ashley Hope Perez
Reasons: Banned, challenged, and restricted for depictions of abuse and because it was considered to be sexually explicit
The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas
Reasons: Banned and challenged for profanity, violence, and because it was thought to promote an anti-police message and indoctrination of a social agenda
The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie
Reasons: Banned and challenged for profanity, sexual references and use of a derogatory term
Me and Earl and the Dying Girl by Jesse Andrews
Reasons: Banned and challenged because it was considered sexually explicit and degrading to women
The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison
Reasons: Banned and challenged because it depicts child sexual abuse and was considered sexually explicit
This Book is Gay by Juno Dawson
Reasons: Banned, challenged, relocated, and restricted for providing sexual education and LGBTQIA+ content.
Beyond Magenta by Susan Kuklin
Reasons: Banned and challenged for LGBTQIA+ content and because it was considered to be sexually explicit.
https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/top10
Gillespie, you are a garbage human.
The Seuss estate didn't stop publishing these books 'on their own initiative'. They stopped publishing them after a decades long harassment campaign.
If you want to see how the estate feels about this, just visit the museum, where that Chinaman, braid and all, features prominently. As do the rest of the characters in the books they were forced to stop publishing.
Unlike the 'banned book' Maus, whose publication has not seen a hiccup.