Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Foreign Policy

U.S. Kills Al Qaeda Leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri. Will It Matter?

Plus: Judge rejects "terrorism" label for January 6 defendant, dozens of abortion clinics have closed since June, FTC staff recommended against Meta lawsuit, and more...

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 8.2.2022 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Al Qaeda leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri | EyePress/Newscom
(EyePress/Newscom)

"Justice has been delivered," President Joe Biden said from the White House yesterday, announcing that the U.S. had "successfully conducted an airstrike in Kabul, Afghanistan that killed the amir of Al Qaeda, Ayman Al-Zawahiri." The 71-year-old Al-Zawahiri helped plan the 9/11 attacks and took over Al Qaeda after Osama bin Laden's death.

"The administration began moving forward with its plan to strike Zawahiri, 71, in April, after intelligence indicated he had moved into a safehouse with his wife, daughter and grandchildren," notes TIME magazine. "Four months later, two missiles slammed into Zawahiri's safehouse as he stood outside on the balcony taking in the morning air, according to a senior administration official. … After the strike Sunday morning, Zawahiri's wife, daughter and grandchildren could be seen fleeing the home, the official said. The administration alleges no civilians were killed."

Biden spun the hit as a matter of justice and resolve, saying it was a symbol of how U.S. intelligence officials "never forget" and have "extraordinary persistence."

That's a nice way of saying that it took them a really long time to carry this out.

Aside from fulfilling America's sense of vengeance and scoring some points for the Biden administration, it's not clear that the killing of Al-Zawahiri—nearly 21 years after 9/11 and 17 years after the last big Al Qaeda attack in Europe (the 2005 bombings in London that killed 52 people)—will make much of a difference for national security, or for stopping terrorism more generally.

It "doesn't necessarily have an earth-shattering impact," Michael Ware, TIME's former Middle East bureau chief, told Sky News Australia. "Because these organisations are built for loss and one of the outstanding features of their ability to wage war against us is their capability to regenerate."

Al-Zawahiri's death could even make things worse, depending on who succeeds him as the head of Al Qaeda or how the group reacts to his death.

"It is not yet clear who will succeed al-Zawahiri—a matter supporters have not yet been observed to discuss publicly," notes BBC journalist Mina Al-Lami. "His only publicly-known deputy, Sayf al-Adl, is reportedly living in Iran, possibly under movement and security restrictions, according to jihadist accounts."

"The question is with Al Qaeda's opaque hierarchy is there another succession plan in place or will this unleash some kind of factional tension as they vie to take over command and control," suggested Ware.

Al-Zawahiri was reportedly not a terribly charismatic leader, leaving the possibility that a successor who is could do much more damage, especially if they're able to unite various Al Qaeda factions and splinter groups around the world.

Today, "the group is splintered, with branches and affiliates spanning the globe from West Africa to India," notes The Washington Post. "The question remains whether those groups will focus on local conflicts or coalesce for more global ambitions."


FREE MINDS

Judge rejects "terrorism" label for January 6 defendant. Guy Reffitt, the first January 6 defendant to go to trial instead of taking a plea deal, has been sentenced to seven years in prison. Prosecutors sought to classify Reffitt's crime as terrorism and sought a 15-year sentence—much more than they have requested for other January 6 defendants. But U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich rejected this bid. "The government is asking for a sentence that is three times as long as any other defendant and the defendant did not assault an officer," said Friedrich, per Politico:

Friedrich also said she worried that Reffitt not be unduly punished for deciding to go to trial, rather than enter into a plea bargain with prosecutors.

"His decision to exercise his constitutional right to go to trial should not result in a dramatically different sentence," she said.

[Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey] Nestler also noted that Reffitt was convicted of having a handgun on his hip while on the Capitol grounds, which Friedrich conceded was an important distinction from the other cases to reach sentencing thus far.

"Huge, huge … and does the firearm deserve three times the sentence if it was not brandished or used in any way?" the judge asked. She later called Reffitt's decision to take what he said was a loaded handgun to the Capitol grounds "by far the most aggravating factor" in what he did.


FREE MARKETS

More than 40 U.S. abortion clinics have closed since the Supreme Court's June decision overturning Roe v. Wade. New research from the Guttmacher Institute counted at least 43 clinic closures, largely concentrated in the South and the Midwest.

"As of July 24, 30 days after the fall of Roe, 11 states—all in the South and Midwest—had either banned abortion completely (Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Texas) or implemented a ban on abortion starting at six weeks of pregnancy (Georgia, Ohio, South Carolina and Tennessee)," notes the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization focused on reproductive freedom. "Prior to the Supreme Court decision on June 24, these 11 states had a total of 71 clinics that provided abortion care. As of July 24, there were only 28 clinics still offering abortions, all located in the four states with six-week bans. Across these 11 states, the number of clinics offering abortions dropped by 43 in just one month."


FOLLOWUP

FTC staff recommended against latest lawsuit against Facebook. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) last week filed a lawsuit to stop Facebook parent company Meta from buying Within Unlimited, the company behind virtual reality fitness app Supernatural. But "according to three people with knowledge of the decision," FTC staff recommended against doing so, reports Bloomberg. FTC chair Lina Khan and fellow Democrats in FTC leadership clearly did not take this advice.

"Agency leadership has been reluctant in the past to counter a recommendation from staff lawyers and economists, whose job it is to provide a technical assessment of whether proposed deals are anticompetitive and whether the agency has the elements to build a winning case," notes Bloomberg. But Khan has made it something of a personal mission to thwart Meta and other big tech companies.


QUICK HITS

BREAKING: The outside agreement reached b/w Manchin and Dem leaders to overhaul building & environmental review in the US, including pushing new WV pipeline. Offered by Dem leaders to help secure Manchin commitment for clean energy subsidies https://t.co/TdGvER5nm8 pic.twitter.com/fHi5NAOGkU

— Jeff Stein (@JStein_WaPo) August 1, 2022

• The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) has poured $435,000 into ads promoting conspiracy theorist GOP candidate John Gibbs in his Michigan Republican primary race against Peter Meijer for a seat in Congress.

• Alabama prisons are very picky about their dress codes for those witnessing executions.

• Did we really want former President Donald Trump to deploy the National Guard on January 6?

• "All the big ideas for 'fixing' social media are bad," suggests Bonnie Kristian at The Daily Beast.

• Score another one for genetically modified crops: A new type of genetically engineered rice needs less fertilizer to make more food.

• Trump endorsed a candidate in the Missouri Republican primary for a U.S. Senate seat. It's just not clear which candidate:

Trump endorses "ERIC" in the Missouri Senate Republican primary. There are two Erics — Grietens and Schmitt — in the race so this isn't really an endorsement. pic.twitter.com/epRjzDUGnm

— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) August 1, 2022

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: Fly Away

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Foreign PolicyWar on TerrorReason RoundupAl QaedaAfghanistanBiden AdministrationTerrorismDrones9/11
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (345)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Judge rejects "terrorism" label for January 6 defendant.

    MAGA JUDGE STRIKES AGAIN

    1. JesseAz   3 years ago

      7 years for not entering a building, not assaulting anyone, not committing violence, but may have had a scary gun never touched on his hip.

      1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   3 years ago

        I imagine a Trumper with a big mouth (and without his guns) should do well in prison. Let's hope he uses the time for reflection and tries to become an adequate person.

        1. Sevo   3 years ago

          Imagine an asshole bigot making sense.
          Naah.
          Fuck off and die, asshole.

        2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

          Better than a tubby blue hair with an ironic moustache, a big mouth and a soft bottom.

        3. Uilleam   3 years ago

          More likely you'll end up the cellmate of some sweaty fat white dude who identifies as a teenage girl, after your progressive utopia fails and the left starts to eat its own.

        4. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

          It's impossible that any of the MAGA rioters on January 6th had a handgun. I've been told many times by commenters here that they were all unarmed and stayed behind the velvet ropes.

          1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

            And here's White Mike to fuck up again. Either don't seem to realize that this "rioter" wasn't in the capitol and didn't do anything, or you do and you're deliberately misrepresenting shit again.

            My money is on the latter.

        5. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

          Guess this is the MAGA apologists fire extinguisher moment.

          1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

            Didn't enter the capitol building, didn't assault anyone, didn't commit violence

            Nope, still yours.

      2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

        Better yet, 7 years for entering the People's house. At what point do we have enough grievances against the administration and entrenched bureaucracy to justify a new Declaration of Independence?

        The King is a fink!

        1. Eeyore   3 years ago

          I don't think he even entered the building. Was just outside.

          1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

            Didn't participate but he was on the wrong team.

          2. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

            Well, that makes everything A-OK!

            1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

              Mike wants people jailed for literally not doing anything too.

              1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

                Better watch the "is that a fire extinguisher in your pants" jokes around White Mike!

        2. Eeyore   3 years ago

          This was purely punishment for being armed.

          1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

            Well, partially punishment for being armed. You were close.

            1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

              Oh? What's the other part, Mike?

              Wrong political beliefs?

            2. Eeyore   3 years ago

              For 7 years in prison I expect to see a victim or intended victim at least.

              1. VULGAR MADMAN   3 years ago

                Thought crime.

              2. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

                I agree it is an excessively long sentence. But he didn't do nothing -- he showed up to riot at the Capitol with a firearm.

                1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

                  Was it a riot when he showed up? No, of course not. Did he participate? No. Did he go inside? No.

                  You're a fascist fuck, Mike.

                  1. R Mac   3 years ago

                    Dee really is a terrible person.

                2. Ersatz   3 years ago

                  Your mind reading attempts require a mind of your own... not your 50cent masters'

                  1. Ersatz   3 years ago

                    so .. he showed up to riot or to protest.

                    tell us how you KNOW it was one and not the other

  2. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    More than 40 U.S. abortion clinics have closed since the Supreme Court's June decision overturning Roe v. Wade.

    Market fail.

    1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      Calling abattoirs "clinics" is great marketing.
      "I'm sending my cattle to the clinic"
      "Oh, how nice"

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        Kinda like sending Ol’ Yeller to the farm.

      2. Jerry B.   3 years ago

        Sorta like calling abortion "reproductive health".

    2. Jerry B.   3 years ago

      Out of 700 or so. 5.7%.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    FTC staff recommended against latest lawsuit against Facebook.

    When your own bureaucrats aren't commie enough.

    1. Not Robbers=Nut Rubbers   3 years ago

      They'll be the first against the wall.

    2. R Mac   3 years ago

      Wait until Reason hears about what the FBI agents who interviewed General Flynn recommended.

      HAHAHA, I’m just kidding, Reason doesn’t care about things like that.

  4. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

    I''m surprised they didn't wait for late October or early November to kill Zawahiri. They must be getting desperate.

    1. Nardz   3 years ago

      Are we sure they killed Zawahiri?
      Last time it turned out to be just some random guy and his 7 kids...

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

        Eh, doesn't matter. It's the announcement that matters.

        1. Derp-o-Matic 6000   3 years ago

          The important thing is that Biden killed some Middle Easterners. Please clap.

          1. Moonrocks   3 years ago

            Clap for that you stupid bastards

        2. Yatusabes   3 years ago

          here is the announcement:

          Biden spun the hit as a matter of justice and resolve, saying it was a symbol of how U.S. intelligence officials "never forget" and have "extraordinary persistence."

          as if.......! Justice and resolve are two words no one would use to describe Brandon, except a PR firm. As for intelligence officers.... they are as popular as the FBI

          Kabul falling ala Saigon is all that comes to mind regarding Biden and Afghanistan

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

            Fake news! Also already wiped from most Americans' memory tapes.

            1. Yatusabes   3 years ago

              lets see how Brandon handles China vis a vis Pelosi in Taiwan

              Americans have half a dozen or more serious concerns about the state of our nation, but the Speaker of the House is doing her runway show in Asia, this after throwing billions at Ukraine. Americans rightly feel Democrats are giving us the middle finger.

              1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

                World War X. Trump started III through IX

                1. Squirrelloid   3 years ago

                  The Great Twitter Wars of hte 21st century?

      2. RedPilledConservative   3 years ago

        Expecting US personnel globally will bear the brunt of the retaliatory strikes from Al Qaeda...

        This was a time to leave it alone rather than to kick the hornets nest - we should be winding down the war on terror - but the war mongers can't have that!!

    2. Quicktown Brix   3 years ago

      Biden took out an elderly ineffective leader which may only strengthen Al Qaeda? I wonder if there are any lessons to be learned here.

    3. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

      They must be getting desperate.

      "They are not buying that there is no recession. Who can we kill?"

      1. Uilleam   3 years ago

        That SHOULD be parody. *sigh*

    4. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

      "Al-Zawahiri! Wham-Ba-Lam!" doesn't roll off the tongue as good as "Al-Baghdadi! Wham-Ba-Lam!". 😉

  5. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    The outside agreement reached b/w Manchin and Dem leaders to overhaul building & environmental review in the US, including pushing new WV pipeline.

    That line will pipe solar and wind across West Virginny.

  6. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1554111044380942338?t=-S3Ifi8cSKq5jZwktm875w&s=19

    Pelosi family got caught so they sold $5 in Nvidia semiconductor stock last week right before Congress is set to vote on semiconductor subsidies, now Pelosi flies to semiconductor world headquarters Taiwan to pump the stock

    Follow the hay, don't follow the hype

    1. Kungpowderfinger   3 years ago

      Open corruption being a perk of perpetual incumbency.

    2. Jerry B.   3 years ago

      $5??

  7. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    All hail Biden! He got us out of Afghanistan!

    1. Yatusabes   3 years ago

      apparently not. We left Afghanistan in the worst way possible only to still be engaging it?

      announcing that the U.S. had "successfully conducted an airstrike in Kabul, Afghanistan

      1. Moonrocks   3 years ago

        apparently not.

        We must have. I was assured by the Editors at Reason that Biden ended US involvement in Afghanistan in a peaceful and orderly manner.

        1. Yatusabes   3 years ago

          only thing Reason is good for is for the comment boxes. Amiright!

          1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

            Correct

          2. Nardz   3 years ago

            Correct

          3. R Mac   3 years ago

            Unfortunately. Didn’t used to be the case.

            1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

              Sad, but true.

        2. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

          I literally cannot think of a foreign policy take from Reason that is any good. Which is weird, because all they have to do is be Dovish and humble and I'd be mostly in agreement. They're somehow snarling and dickish though. They should take a Taftian non-interventionism.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) has poured $435,000 into ads promoting conspiracy theorist GOP candidate John Gibbs...

    Who're the white supremacists now?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      Just like voters, committees sometimes get mixed up and pull the wrong levers.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Alabama prisons are very picky about their dress codes for those witnessing executions.

    It's not like it's a solemn event.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

      Journalists making themselves the story is peak 2020's.

      1. JimboJr   3 years ago

        'journalists feelings hurt' is inexcusable

    2. damikesc   3 years ago

      I know. I do not think "dress appropriately. A man is dying here" is really that much of an ask.

      1. Yatusabes   3 years ago

        ENB fake news:

        Alabama prisons are very picky about their dress codes for those witnessing executions.

        bullshit. It was for a sole reporterette, not your usual, ordinary watcher of AL executions. What it says about a reporter dressing inappropriately for such an event, enough ink had already been bled on these parasites.

        Alabama prison officials examined female reporters’ clothing and tried to block a female reporter with AL.com from witnessing Thursday night’s execution of a death-row inmate, saying her skirt and shoes violated a prison dress code.

        1. Nardz   3 years ago

          ENB is truly despicable vermin

        2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

          Sex work is work!

          1. R Mac   3 years ago

            Was a romp with the reporter his dying wish?

    3. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

      Public executions being a giant spectacle is one of those sci-fi tropes that has never come true. Unfortunately.

    4. The Margrave of Azilia   3 years ago

      The only dress code should be for the executioner.

      The black hood should fully cover the face, leaving openings only for they eyes.

    5. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

      I'm going to have my own execution, with strippers, and booze, you know what forget the execution

      1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        I would hope one could get the embibement and partners of your choice without execution and without doing something to get executed. Yikes!

    6. Jerry B.   3 years ago

      This story was useless without pictures.

  10. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

    "dozens of abortion clinics have closed since June"

    Maybe billionaire abortion supporters like Charles Koch and Michael Bloomberg and Bill Gates and Mackenzie Bezos and George Soros could build some new ones.

    #BillionairesKnowBest

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      I am still confused. How do more abortions add to the supply of cheap labor?

      1. Moonrocks   3 years ago

        By attracting Undocumented Migrants.

    2. Eeyore   3 years ago

      I thought most of the revenue was from reproductive health counseling.

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        Shush. That narrative has quietly been abandoned.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Did we really want former President Donald Trump to deploy the National Guard on January 6?

    When Trump isn't authoritarian enough for you...

    1. Longtobefree   3 years ago

      For those who care -
      The DC National Guard doesn't have a lot of infantry soldiers.

      District of Columbia Army National Guard
      Multi-Agency Augmentation Command, commanded by an O7
      74th Troop Command (United States), commanded by an O6
      372nd Military Police Battalion ("Red Hand")
      547th Transportation Company
      104th Maintenance Company
      260th Regiment (Regional Training Institute)
      257th Army Band "The Band of the Nation's Capital"
      1-224th Aviation Security and Support Battalion
      D Company (Air Ambulance)
      Detachment 1, A Company
      1-126th General Support Aviation Battalion
      Detachment 1, C Company (Air Ambulance)
      District of Columbia Medical Command
      Detachment 4, Operational Support Airlift Command
      Recruiting and Retention Battalion
      National Guard Bureau Legal Support Office

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

        But deploying the band could have been hilarious. Or seditious.

        1. MK Ultra   3 years ago

          Sousa marches are White Supremecy.

    2. Barnstormer   3 years ago

      I read the thing. The author has a most acute case of TDS; one symptom is nauseating sophistry.

    3. Moonrocks   3 years ago

      This is like their fifth pivot on this, this time from TRUMP IS AUTHORITARIAN BECAUSE HE DIDN'T SEND IN THE NATIONAL GUARD!! to TRUMP IS AUTHORITARIAN BECAUSE HE OFFERED TO SEND IN THE NATIONAL GUARD AT THE DC MAYOR'S AND/OR CONGRESS' REQUEST!!

      Remember, the original big lie on life support with all this bluster is TRUMP ORDERED ARMED MAGA THUGS TO TAKE THE CAPITOL AS PART OF A COUP!!

      1. Derp-o-Matic 6000   3 years ago

        Trump is an evil authoritarian. We back-fill the reasons in pencil so we can update them as circumstances change or our lies become untenable.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

          Trump has always been at war with Eastasia.

        2. Nardz   3 years ago

          Thankfully we have stenographers like Reason to uncritically repeat whatever the regime comes up with in the moment

      2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        1. Trump attempted a planned insurrection.
        2. Okay, loosely planned.
        3. Okay, not planned, but he encouraged it.
        4. Okay, he didn't encourage it, but he didn't try to stop it.
        5. Okay, he did try to stop the violence, but he should have done more, and sooner, during fog of war. Three long hours and only a handful of tweets and a video address.
        6. Shut up, insurrectionist!

        1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

          LOL

          1. Jerry B.   3 years ago

            +1

    4. Social Justice is neither   3 years ago

      Regardless of what he did they would declare him wrong, it's their classic "heads I win tails you lose" argumentation they always deploy.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

        Be fair. Many people have defined their identity as anti-Trump. And using the advanced logical concept of "opposites", since they are good Trump must be bad.

    5. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

      If only there were a federal agency that answered to the President with police powers, jurisdiction in WA DC and offices situated within site of the Capitol. That could have made a real difference in what happened on 1/6.

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        Pretty sure they did make a big difference in what happened on 1/6.

  12. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    If the people that live and work in DC we're killed in a terrorist attack only 30% of the country would care.

    The j6 trials are the final proof anyone needs that the US is a regime state and not a constitutional republic

    1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   3 years ago

      Knock. Knock.

      Who's there?

      Not Ashli Babbitt. Not anymore.

      Not Guy Reffitt. Not for a while.

      Carry on, clingers.

      1. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

        But who was actually there?

        1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

          Someone Kirkland's crew hasn't killed or imprisoned I guess.

      2. Sevo   3 years ago

        "Who's there?"

        Asshole bigot, that's who.

      3. R Mac   3 years ago

        I assume you talk like this to try to compensate for a childhood of being pummeled by bigger, stronger, boys. But it won’t, poor Kirkland. Your only hope is to seek out therapy to deal with your inadequacies. Impotent rage on the internet will never heal you.

      4. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

        Knock. Knock.

        Who's there?

        Not Joseph Rosenbaum or Anthony Huber. Not anymore.

        Not Gage Grosskreutz. Not for a while.

        Carry on, hicklib.

      5. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        You're just jealous because you don't have a fur cape to flourish! 🙂

    2. MK Ultra   3 years ago

      I'm kind of an obnoxious prick, so it would be fine not to shed a tear for me after the attack. Although I do not now, nor have I ever been employed by either the DC or Federal Governments, so that ought to be a mark in my favor.

      Maybe flip a coin to decide whether to care.

  13. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/ACLU/status/1554151348949729280?t=EW7gWM9NZE8EDzqfzyIldA&s=19

    BREAKING: We filed an amicus brief today urging the Supreme Court to protect universities’ ability to consider race in college admissions.

    Ending these considerations would ignore our country’s present-day racial inequality and threaten diversity on campuses everywhere.

    1. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

      I'm a proud ACLU donor. It's such a wonderful organization. Only freedom-hating wingnuts would ever criticize it.

      #MoreButtplugInsights

    2. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

      I mean if we don't have racial quotas the darkies would never get in, what with the racist requirements of showing up, and objective truth

      1. HorseConch   3 years ago

        Gotta love the ACLU pimping for protecting racism.

      2. Fats of Fury   3 years ago

        Please, That's People of Darkieness.

    3. Mickey Rat   3 years ago

      What does the ACLU have against ethnic East Asians?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

        The ACLU has always been at war with Eastasia.

    4. JimboJr   3 years ago

      I guess the civil liberties of Indian/Asian people are not under the 'ACLU' umbrella

      1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

        Its hard to fit anything else under the umbrella with POC shemale buttsex orgy currently in full swing. Its gotten so big they have moved it inside to the school gymnasium.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   3 years ago

          And the videos will be utilized in the kindergarten sex ed classes.

      2. Fats of Fury   3 years ago

        Only if they're trans.

    5. Jerry B.   3 years ago

      Colleges will just check your intersectionality score, without looking at the data behind it, and tell us that's fair and non-biased.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    All the big ideas for 'fixing' social media are bad...

    Time to shift the Twitter Overton window away from big ideas.

  15. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

    Watch Greenpeace really go nuts if they combine that nitrogen gene edit with Golden Rice.

    Go GMO Go!

    1. mad.casual   3 years ago

      I wouldn't get too excited. More nitrogen efficient rice production is a big deal but legumes (soy, pea, and clover) have always been several-*fold* better at nitrogen fixation than cereals. Further, I feel it should go without saying, but this is Reason, GMOs aren't magical unicorn farts. A rice that's 40% more efficient at growing on the same amount of nitrogen doesn't mean dick if you cut the exogenous nitrogen deposition by 40% (or more). It just means you have to grow the same amount or more of legumes to fix the nitrogen (or otherwise deposit it) for the cereals to uptake. Reason has a habit of reporting scientific breakthroughs as though '40% more efficient rubber production translating to 40% reduced consumption of gasoline at the pump'.

      The world certainly isn't suffering any shortage of caloric production and even if it is, given China's vacant housing boom/bust, it's not for lack of ability to produce crops.

      1. Eeyore   3 years ago

        The rice might just be 40% more efficient at depleting the soil. I want to see an actual farmer use it for 5 years and give an honest review before I get excited. The new tech might be awesome and it might suck ass.

  16. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    ENB is missing the point of the trump offer to deploy the national guard.

    The dems have repeatedly said that trump wanted an insurrection. Trump offering the national guard is proof he didnt

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

      Trump was playing 36DD chess, knowing that his suggesting calling out the National Guard would automatically mean it would not be called out.

      1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

        Sadly I think this is how ENB thinks. While at the same time saying he's the dumbest person alive

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

          The ladies sure get themselves confused. That's why it's better to leave decisions to men.

      2. Tim B   3 years ago

        >was playing 36DD chess

        Now that's a game worth getting behind.

        1. Sir Chips Alot   3 years ago

          I think i would prefer to be in front of that

          1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

            Maybe just all over it, no need to be picky.

        2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

          Motorboating up the Potomac.

          1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

            Check and Mate! 😉

        3. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

          36DD chess? On a hooker's chest? 🙂

        4. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

          That would be playing on her butt.

    2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      "ENB is missing the point of the trump offer to deploy the national guard."

      Accidentally on purpose.

      As Yatusabes mentioned, she's also forgetting that three days earlier Liz Cheney organized a letter signed by “All 10 living former defense secretaries" warning against Trump summoning the military for assistance.

  17. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

    Good morning Peanuts! As the most successful liberal capitalist in this comment section I'm here to remind you not to believe anti-Biden lies from wingnut.com sites like CNBC. When they tell you Unrelenting inflation is driving up costs, leaving more Americans living paycheck to paycheck, you can just ignore it. We're actually in the best economy ever.

    #TemporarilyFillingInForButtplug

    1. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

      On one hand, I want to believe it because it reflects badly on the current president. On the other hand it's CNBC...

    2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      "We're actually in the best economy ever."

      Sure you can't afford hamburger, but Warren Buffett's stocks are up!

      1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

        Please leave the parody to obl

        1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

          What parody?

  18. Moonrocks   3 years ago

    U.S. Kills Al Qaeda Leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri

    WWIII!!!1!

    1. Jerryskids   3 years ago

      WWWIV - remember Trump started WWWIII when he had Soleimani extra-judiciously murdered.

      1. Sir Chips Alot   3 years ago

        oh, i thought that was when Republicans shot down net neutrality.

    2. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

      I think we're on 5 now. 3 was the Cold War. 4 was the war on terror. China will be 5.

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        You’re not going to give Trump credit for a single WW? Sad.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Trump endorses “ERIC” in the Missouri Senate Republican primary. There are two Erics — Grietens and Schmitt — in the race so this isn’t really an endorsement.

    A good businessman hedges against loss.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   3 years ago

      And we know exactly who he isn't endorsing.

  20. Rich   3 years ago

    Friedrich also said she worried that Reffitt not be unduly punished for deciding to go to trial, rather than enter into a plea bargain with prosecutors.

    Is she also worried about undue punishment for lack of remorse?

    1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

      He should be sorry he didn't pull his pistol?

  21. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    The administration began moving forward with its plan to strike Zawahiri, 71, in April...

    After realizing they couldn't trick him into getting boosted.

  22. Rich   3 years ago

    Alabama prisons say reporter’s skirt too short to witness execution

    despite executee's last request

    1. mad.casual   3 years ago

      Just lift the skirt up so it can see through the view window, duh.

    2. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

      They did it to protect the executee as that reporter was Helen Thomas Jr.

    3. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

      Is she looking with her "Little Brown Eye?"

  23. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    ...it's not clear that the killing of Al-Zawahiri—nearly 21 years after 9/11 and 17 years after the last big Al Qaeda attack in Europe (the 2005 bombings in London that killed 52 people)—will make much of a difference for national security, or for stopping terrorism more generally.

    Sometimes it's not about that.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      Could it be...an election year?

      1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        Wag that little dog hard.

    2. Eeyore   3 years ago

      They have been blowing up entire families with children with drones for years trying to take him out. They finally got lucky is all.

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        Reportedly.

      2. Nardz   3 years ago

        Or they just blew up another family (again) and claimed it was Zawahiri

        1. CE   3 years ago

          Except the drone in this case was not an explosive device, but a really big spear with razor sharp blades:

          https://nypost.com/2022/08/02/what-is-the-r9x-hellfire-the-precision-ninja-bomb-that-killed-al-zawahiri/

          The strangest variant in the Hellfire family of missiles — built as a precision weapon of targeted assassination — the R9X’s most distinguishing characteristic is that it doesn’t explode and simply uses its weight, momentum and blade-like appendages to kill.

          So in addition to murdering a suspected foreign criminal with no attempt to bring him to trial, they literally went medieval.

          1. Eeyore   3 years ago

            Interesting.

      3. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

        Ahem they have been late term aborting families

        1. Eeyore   3 years ago

          If a woman or her doctor is piloting the drone - is it her right to choose?

  24. sarcasmic   3 years ago

    Prosecutors sought to classify Reffitt's crime as terrorism and sought a 15-year sentence—much more than they have requested for other January 6 defendants.

    Where does Reason get their news? I've been told so many times on this forum that every J6 defendant was being tried as a terrorist and facing life in prison. Why does Reason have to lie about everything?

    1. R Mac   3 years ago

      Broken.

    2. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      Why oh why can't Reason be more like The Federalist!

  25. sarcasmic   3 years ago

    Chinese TANKS flood beaches opposite Taiwan as Beijing warns America will 'pay the price' for Pelosi's Taipei visit: Four US warships lie off island's east coast and flight tracking website goes DOWN as 300,000 people chart Nancy's journey

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11071621/Chinese-warplanes-buzz-line-dividing-Taiwan-Strait-expected-Pelosi-visit-source.html

    Meanwhile Republicans everywhere get uncontrollable erections upon hearing that news.

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

      I just read a funny not-quite-sci-fi sci fi story "Navy Day" by Harry Harrison from the January 1964 If Worlds of Science Fiction, where the Army invents a gizmo which increases water's surface tension so much that they can run tanks and individual soldiers out on oceans; they want to abolish the Navy, but in the nick of time, the navy invents a gizmo which liquifies solids and runs the USS Missouri down Pennsylvania Avenue. Maybe China has (re)invented it!

      (It's barely even a story, and calling it science fiction is a stretch too. But I just read it last night and the timing is fun.)

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

        January 1954 issue.

        1. BrianL.   3 years ago

          You can read the story here:

          https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/30019/pg30019-images.html

      2. sarcasmic   3 years ago

        His Deathworld books were some of my favorites in high school.

        1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

          Stainless Steel Rat books were fun, but dumb.

      3. mad.casual   3 years ago

        Wait, if you have a gizmo that liquefies solids, wouldn't a submarine be a better attack vessel?

        1. Ronbback   3 years ago

          if it liquefies solids how does it not liquefy a steel battle ship?

          1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

            Or how do the soldiers not increase their internal liquid surface tension, or the tank's fuel and lubricants?

    2. Moonrocks   3 years ago

      So if nothing else happens, communist China will do what communist China has done every time a US official visits Taiwan in the past.

      1. Ronbback   3 years ago

        how many officials have visited in the past? if they had then this is just China showing the world Biden is weak NUKE them all

    3. Marshal   3 years ago

      Meanwhile Republicans everywhere get uncontrollable erections upon hearing that news.

      Nancy Pelosi takes America closer to war, so naturally sarc concludes Republicans are to blame. The Sarcasmic Prime Directive is "Protect the Dems!"

      1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

        That was an incredibly stupid take on what I said. Especially from someone who would like to see Pelosi dead.

        1. Marshal   3 years ago

          You'd like to pretend it's stupid, but your problem is that my comment matches reality. Claiming reality is stupid so you prefer to believe in FantasyLand is not compelling to anyone other than yourself. But that's who you are.

          The Plane! The Plane!

          1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

            Again, really fucking stupid. But that's to be expected when all that blood rushed out of your brain at the thought of Pelosi being killed.

            1. Uilleam   3 years ago

              Get sober.

            2. Marshal   3 years ago

              But that's to be expected when all that blood rushed out of your brain at the thought of Pelosi being killed.

              The Plane! The Plane!

              I thought you were saying this about yourself, but I see you're just making up stupid shit again. Maybe if your beliefs were based even in a small part on reality you wouldn't be such an idiot. Whatever floats your boat, if you think living in FantasyLand is preferable there's no stopping you. But don't expect anyone else to think your fantasies are real.

              1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

                I'm not the one who sees any criticism of Republicans as proof of being a leftist. That's your fantasy, not mine.

                My fantasies are metric.

                https://music.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_nU_OJDIGkkIlFcMDr5qBacO8pD4kzTKfI

                1. Marshal   3 years ago

                  I'm not the one who sees any criticism of Republicans as proof of being a leftist.

                  This is of course a lie to justify the conclusion. The charge is that you find a way to blame Reps even when Dems do something stupid. It's not "any" criticism. But you'll never address the facts because reality proves me right.

                  1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

                    What facts? You're making stuff up. Again.

                    1. Marshal   3 years ago

                      "What facts?"

                      My evidence is that you criticize Reps when Dems do something stupid rather than criticizing Dems. You know this is true so you lied that my criticism is simply that you criticize Reps.

                      You're making stuff up. Again.

                      This is not true. But even assuming arguendo that it were on what basis do you have a problem with it? After all, you made up that I want Pelosi dead. So on what basis is "making stuff up" a negative to you?

                      Regulars know that you have the highest standards for your enemies and no standards for yourself or your allies. But don't you have an justification to hide this fact from the newbies?

                    2. sarcasmic   3 years ago

                      My evidence is that you criticize Reps when Dems do something stupid rather than criticizing Dems.

                      Oh I criticize Democrats plenty. But you pretend those comments don't exist because it contradicts your world view that people are on one team or the other.

                      After all, you made up that I want Pelosi dead.

                      You don't?

                      Regulars know that you have the highest standards for your enemies and no standards for yourself or your allies.

                      What allies? That's what I'm pointing out here. You see the world as two teams. Yours and the other. So if I'm not on your team I'm allied with the other team. Except that I'm not on a team, so I have no allies.

                      I'm not the broken one.

                    3. Marshal   3 years ago

                      Oh I criticize Democrats plenty.

                      No. You criticize Dems only when you need to protect your credibility because your bias has become too obvious. I'd like you to point out one single time you criticized Dems when a Rep did something stupid. It's literally never happened in what, maybe 60,000 comments? 100,000? By contrast the reverse has happened thousands of times, including in this thread.

                      You see the world as two teams. Yours and the other.

                      Stupidly wrong and juvenile. But just because other teams exist doesn't mean you're on one. The fact that you consistently judge the right by different standards and act to protect Dems shows you're not on an independent team. If you're on a different team it is one effectively allied to Dems, which is why you judge them by in-group standards and Reps by out-group standards.

                      It's interesting that you think other people's understanding is too limited, but the truth is that you contextualize their comments into a small mind framework because you are not aware enough to understand the more complex picture.

        2. Uilleam   3 years ago

          That was an incredibly stupid take on a valid point. There are warhawks on both side of the fence; I don't think anyone needs to be reminded of that fact. Stop apologizing for this horrible administration and we might start taking you seriously.

          1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

            I might take you and your buddies seriously if you had a single example of me apologizing for this administration or supporting the left.

            Thing is, you don't. You're so small-minded that any criticism of your team is interpreted as support for the other team. You cannot conceptualize someone not being on a team.

            So you will continue to see anyone who isn't on your team as an active member of the other team. That's what tiny minds do.

            1. Marshal   3 years ago

              a single example of me apologizing for this administration or supporting the left.

              Revealing word choice. We just posted an example of sarc protecting Dems by redirecting their stupidity to Reps. But he tries to avoid accusation made, protect, because including it makes it obvious he fails the standard. In fact finding a way to blame Reps for Dem stupidity is the single most common theme in his tens of thousands of comments.

              1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

                We just posted an example of sarc protecting Dems by redirecting their stupidity to Reps.

                No. That was your feeble mind interpreting any diss against Republicans as support of Democrats because your fantasy world consists of Republicans and leftists.

                1. Marshal   3 years ago

                  Republicans had nothing to do with her flying to Taiwan. You tried to turn the subject to Republicans because your mission is attacking them rather than Democrats. A fair person, i.e., not you, offers criticisms for actual events, they don't fantasize about what others might be thinking in order to justify an attack all while ignoring the real world event.

                  Pointing out this protects the Dems is simply reality. That's all you're here for as your thousands of comments prove.

                  Tell me more about how I wish Pelosi were dead. What other idiotic beliefs have you invented to justify your worldview?

                  1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

                    You tried to turn the subject to Republicans because your mission is attacking them rather than Democrats.....What other idiotic beliefs have you invented to justify your worldview?

                    You're making up motives, calling me a liar when I disagree, and then accusing me of making up idiotic beliefs? Dude...

                    1. Marshal   3 years ago

                      The reality is right above. You claimed my evidence is "any criticism of Reps" when it is not. You claim I want Pelosi dead based on nothing at all.

                      You are a liar. You do make up idiotic beliefs. It's amusing you object to these well supported charges but have nothing to say about how you concluded I want Pelosi dead. But we always knew standards are those things you apply only to others, never to yourself.

                    2. sarcasmic   3 years ago

                      You claim I want Pelosi dead based on nothing at all.

                      Based on nothing? Next to Nardz and Sevo who openly advocate for murdering political opponents, you're the most hostile person here.

                    3. Marshal   3 years ago

                      Next to Nardz and Sevo who openly advocate for murdering political opponents, you're the most hostile person here.

                      You omitted people like yourself who admit they are only here to antagonize other commenters, and further lie about the beliefs they attack proving their dishonesty. But yes I'm hostile to liars, assholes, and trolls so you're a triple winner. Maybe if you were less of an asshole people wouldn't react to your sanctimonious pretense you're above it all.

                      But let's focus on your admission you knowingly attributed this idiotic belief to me based on what others supposedly said (which, let's admit, is probably a lie also). It's an interesting rebuttal given how often you whine that others attribute to you views you don't hold. Is attributing to one commenter something said by another commenter wrong or not? If you were actually the person you pretend to be you wouldn't accidentally fuck up and prove you're not essentially every time you comment.

                      Standards are those things other people need to live up to, right?

                    4. R Mac   3 years ago

                      Brutal bitchslap on sarc.

            2. Uilleam   3 years ago

              I don't have a team. I vote for whatever candidates I think will maximize liberty, which are few and far between. You on the other hand seem completely broken.

              1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

                I vote for whatever candidates I think will maximize liberty, which are few and far between.

                That's why I'm no longer registered to vote. While there are plenty of people to vote against, there is no one to vote for. When there is such a person I'll go out and reregister.

                You on the other hand seem completely broken.

                I'm broken because I point out the people who take any criticism of their team as support for the other team? No dude. I'm not the broken one.

                1. Marshal   3 years ago

                  people who take any criticism of their team as support for the other team?

                  Again, a lie. It's like watching a child justifying himself, thinking that by simply refusing to admit what happened they "prove" they are right.

                  1. R Mac   3 years ago

                    Haha, sarc is like the kid with with orange fingertips swearing he didn’t eat the cheetos.

    4. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      Ugh, why the hell is Pelosi provoking China when the world is already massively unstable from Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

      1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

        I dunno, but my dumb joke sure pissed off Lord Marshal. I can only assume that he took great offense because I hit too close to the truth.

        1. Uilleam   3 years ago

          He's calmly pointing out how retarded you are. You're completely irrational.

          1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

            The ones who take any perceived slight against Republicans as support for Democrats are irrational. Not me.

            1. R Mac   3 years ago

              Full lie mode now. It wasn’t “any perceived slight”, it was an obvious, slanderous slight as a response to the actions of Nancy Pelosi.

          2. sarcasmic   3 years ago

            And there's nothing calm about Marshal. If he was using dictating software his comments would be all caps.

  26. damikesc   3 years ago

    "Did we really want former President Donald Trump to deploy the National Guard on January 6?"

    Given the whining that he "did nothing", apparently.

  27. Rich   3 years ago

    Miller and others may have quietly used red tape to hamstring the D.C. National Guard’s deployment and disempower President Trump, rendering it harder for him to use the guard to engineer a “Reichstag moment”

    As opposed to noisily using zip ties?

    1. HorseConch   3 years ago

      That they found laying around.

  28. sarcasmic   3 years ago

    Chris Rock has 'no plans' to reach out to Will Smith after the actor publicly apologised for THAT Oscars slap

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-11072697/Chris-Rock-no-plans-reach-Smith-actor-apologised-Oscar-slap.html

    Will's squeaky clean image is finally crumbling. From what I've read about his offscreen life he seems to be quite a douchebag.

    1. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

      From what I've read about his offscreen life he seems to be quite a douchebag.

      This isn't surprising to anyone who has actually been to West Philadelphia. Or South Philadephia. Or Philadelphia.

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        What about Bel- Air?

        1. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

          I want to say it's douche-y due to my inborn biases, but I can honestly say I've never been there or met anyone from there.

    2. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      I don't know much about the guy, but I was disappointed.

      My daughter had just finished watching a really cool series of "Welcome to Earth" adventure videos Will Smith did for National Geographic. And then he goes and acts like an asshole at the Oscars.

      1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

        He was an asshole long before that. His clean image is only that: and image.

  29. Rich   3 years ago

    "Did we really want former President Donald Trump to deploy the National Guard on January 6?"

    "Did we really want current Representative Eric Swalwell to deploy nuclear weapons on January 6?"

  30. Yatusabes   3 years ago

    Did we really want former President Donald Trump to deploy the National Guard on January 6?

    from the link

    .....the U.S. House Jan. 6 committee’s July 21 hearing, which offered demoralizing details about Trump’s failure to intervene in the storming of the U.S. Capitol....

    OTOH, Liz Cheney organized an Op-Ed in WaPo with various signers to....

    Inside Liz Cheney’s Coordinated Effort To Prevent Troop Deployment Before Jan. 6
    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/02/inside-liz-cheneys-coordinated-effort-to-prevent-troop-deployment-before-jan-6/

    Yet Cheney herself seems to have orchestrated opposition to use of the military to quell election-related unrest, allegedly organizing a Washington Post op-ed on Jan. 3, 2021, signed by every living former defense secretary. “All 10 living former defense secretaries: Involving the military in election disputes would cross into dangerous territory,” the headline read. It went on to threaten any military official who thought any use of the military might be a good idea. “Civilian and military officials who direct or carry out such measures would be accountable, including potentially facing criminal penalties, for the grave consequences of their actions on our republic,” the op-ed warned. The op-ed was allegedly organized by Cheney, whose father was secretary of defense under President George H.W. Bush before serving as President George W. Bush’s vice president. Eric Edelman, a national security adviser to Dick Cheney, told the New Yorker the Wyoming lawmaker “was the one who generated” the piece for the Post.

    1. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

      Yet people sought to smear Trump by saying he didn’t reach out to the Pentagon. So, ya know…damned if you do, fanned if you don’t. They’re trying to say he was criminally negligent for not doing the thing they said it would be criminal to do.

      Very nice Catch 22 they constructed. Fuck this whole process, I’m tired of the mendacious assholes involved.

      1. Ronbback   3 years ago

        the intent was clear no matter what happened they were going to go after Trump. And this by itself helps with the conspiracy theory that the riots were a set up. The FBI has long known that it only takes a few instigators to turn a protest into a riot, they have been doing that since the 60's

    2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      She was a busy little beaver that year when it came to troop movement.

      House Democrats, Working With Liz Cheney, Restrict Trump’s Planned Withdrawal of Troops From Afghanistan and Germany

      1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

        The military continuing an illegal way is Syria is totally not a coup though

        1. R Mac   3 years ago

          All sarcasm aside, can you imagine all the really good journalism about the military and executive branch being completely out of control and unaccountable Reason could have published if they didn’t suffer from TDS?

          And Liz Cheney should definitely have been the source of at least one article regarding her warmongering outside her authority.

          1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

            That's why everyone just reads the comments now. They are official on team cocktail part progressives

  31. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

    '"Justice has been delivered," President Joe Biden said from the White House'

    So, blowing up a cult leader who has terrorized millions of people for years is "justice". Good to know.

    1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

      "Justice has been delivered,"

      He may have been confused. That's the codephrase his Secret Service detail uses to signify Biden is finished taking a dump.

      1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        Biden could never finish taking a dump without becoming like a shed snakeskin. 🙂

  32. Brandybuck   3 years ago

    Wait... I though Biden's great historical achievement was getting us OUT of Afghanistan?

    1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

      What are you talking about? Trump got us out of Afghanistan. Biden only finished what Trump started.

      Remember when the other team does something right you give credit to the previous administration, and when they do something wrong they get all the blame.

      1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        Trump created a comprehensive withdrawal plan and an agreement with the Taliban, that Biden promptly broke and threw in the trash. Then after saying he wouldn't withdraw, he suddenly bugged out leaving allies from the Afghan government to Dutch and British troops shocked and unprepared.

        1. Sevo   3 years ago

          If you want something fucked up, give it to droolin' Joe.

          1. mpercy   3 years ago

            "Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up," Obama told a fellow Democrat during the 2020 presidential primary.

            1. Nardz   3 years ago

              Leftists didn't, it was what they were counting on

        2. sarcasmic   3 years ago

          sarcasm, dimwit

          1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

            We all know what what you were doing.

            1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

              We all know what what you were doing. I'm making stuff up to impress my troll buddies.

              ftfy

              1. Uilleam   3 years ago

                Sarcasmic is the only rational commenter here. Everyone else is a troll apparently. Just a bunch of trolls here to troll Sarcasmic... You need a life dude.

                1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

                  Reading any and all criticism of Republicans as support for Democrats is indeed irrational.

                  1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

                    But you weren't making valid criticism. You were deliberately spouting what you knew to be BS just to get a rise out of us.

                    And then you have the guts to call us trolls...

                    1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

                      BS? Really?

                      Remember when the other team does something right you give credit to the previous administration, and when they do something wrong they get all the blame.

                      BS? Criticism of your team or of both teams equals support for the other team. Anyone who isn't on your team is on the other team. All good is from your team and all bad from the other. When your team is in power they get all the credit and the previous administration gets all the blame. When the other team is in power the previous administration gets all the credit and the current one gets all the blame.

                      That's exactly how you and the rest of the team players think. You not liking it doesn't make it untrue.

                    2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

                      Shouting "both sides" on an issue where the Trump administration did absolutely nothing wrong and the Biden Administration did absolutely everything wrong, isn't impartiality, you tremendous fucking idiot.
                      It's covering for the Democrats.

        3. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

          Shock and unprepared? I thought they were stunning and brave

    2. Yatusabes   3 years ago

      the video imagery of Afghan men falling in-flight from C17 USAF planes departing Kabul .....those are on Biden forever.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      Obama rules: drones don't count.

      1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        Unless it's an Iranian terrorist and then you've started WW3.

    4. JimboJr   3 years ago

      His historical 'achievement' was winning an election despite not campaigning at all and having full on dementia, and then going on to be the least popular president in history despite fawning propaganda.

    5. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      Silly. It's right in the UN charter that the US is allowed to carry out drone strikes anywhere on earth, disregarding any national sovereignty issues.

  33. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

    "Al-Zawahiri was reportedly not a terribly charismatic leader, leaving the possibility that a successor who is could do much more damage, especially if they're able to unite various Al Qaeda factions and splinter groups around the world."

    Like Biden and Democrats?

    1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      But less dangerous to America. Al Qaeda only wishes they could have wreaked that kind of destruction.

      1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

        All those years and money spent trying to acquire deadly pathogens when a bad flu bug was all it took to destroy freedom and the world economy. Someone has egg on their face covering.

  34. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Al-Zawahiri's death could even make things worse, depending on who succeeds him as the head of Al Qaeda...

    "An infidel is someone who sows infidelity, and infidelity is what the infidel sows. We must every day strive for fidelity to Islam, and we must do that every day. Praise Allah, peace by upon him, and upon him be peace, which is what we wish upon him."

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      Sounds like DNC talking points.

      1. JimboJr   3 years ago

        infidel -> republican
        infidelity - > insurrection
        Islam - > the Science! / climate / DEI
        Allah -> Fauci / BIPOC people

        that about does it

        1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

          "A Republican is someone who spreads insurrection, and insurrection is what the Republican spreads. We must every day strive for fidelity to the science, and we must do that every day. Praise BIPOC, peace be upon them, and upon them be peace, which is what we wish for them."

          It works!

          1. Moonrocks   3 years ago

            Did Kamala Harris really say that?

            1. Minadin   3 years ago

              I'm sure she will at some point in the passage of time.

              1. Ersatz   3 years ago

                it reads a little too coherent for something that could come out of her pea sized brain

        2. MK Ultra   3 years ago

          "Democrat Mad-Libs" Even the title works.

          Nicely done.

      2. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 years ago

        Sounds like DNC talking points.

        And VP Harris helped with the script

    2. Nardz   3 years ago

      https://twitter.com/CatchUpScoop/status/1554165218204418050?t=I_8eMF1Qw4_L9pvJmkDcaQ&s=19

      Do you guys remember this cringe nonsense from Kamala?

      [Video]

    3. Sometimes a Great Notion   3 years ago

      But will they work together?

    4. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

      John Cleese's Ann Elk character explaining Islam. 🙂

      1. Ersatz   3 years ago

        that sounds like a theory that you have, and what it is, and that is yours

  35. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

    "Alabama prisons are very picky about their dress codes for those witnessing executions."

    What, no more white robes and hoods?

    1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

      Nope. Now everyone is required to wear police uniforms.

  36. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

    "Score another one for genetically modified crops: A new type of genetically engineered rice needs less fertilizer to make more food."

    Trying to prove Paul Ehrlich wrong? How dare you!

    1. Moonrocks   3 years ago

      Well that's a problem. That undercuts the whole reason for restricting the use of fertilizer.

      1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        So have the Luvvy's call for ban's on GMO like they did with golden rice.

        Agenda 2030 won't implement itself.

  37. sarcasmic   3 years ago

    Shocking moment cops rip locks off woman's home as they try to serve her with an eviction notice - and then admit they've got the WRONG house

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11070363/Shocking-moment-cops-rip-locks-womans-home-try-serve-eviction-notice.html

    The officer immediately returned, 'Ay, we actually, we do apologize, we have the wrong house. It's the next-door neighbors. What we are going to have to do is we're going to have to - they are going to have to - repair their locks.'

    Cops apologizing and repairing the locks? That is indeed shocking!

  38. Unicorn Abattoir   3 years ago

    U.S. Kills Al Qaeda Leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri. Will It Matter?

    Not this election cycle.

  39. Bubba Jones   3 years ago

    She borrowed waders that didn't have boots?

    How does that work?

  40. Unicorn Abattoir   3 years ago

    Score another one for genetically modified crops: A new type of genetically engineered rice needs less fertilizer to make more food.

    2nd sentence in the article - "Extracting and burning natural gas is harming life on our planet, so we should probably stop doing it"

    The article goes on from there.

    1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      It's a religious cult. He's uttering doctrinal positions, not facts.

    2. mad.casual   3 years ago

      Let's not forget that the underlying assumption that producing both more nitrogen *and* CO2 for more crops and humans to grow, to the tune of zettatons of crops and billions of humans, simultaneously is bad. Much better that we expend gigatons of CO2 to scrape out kilotons more nitrogen for a couple million people rather than simply turning the pressure up on the Haber-Bosch process, burn through more ferrite, and crank out more nitrogen and CO2 for relatively massive numbers of crops and humans.

      1. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

        As long as this allows us to finally end the scourge of GMOs.

  41. Sevo   3 years ago

    Let's redefine stuff to make it more scary:

    "Call Congress’ inaction on climate change what it is: child abuse"
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/congress-inaction-climate-change-17343568.php?cmpid=gsa-sfgate-result

    Or, let's bullshit.

    1. Moonrocks   3 years ago

      Redefining words is how we solve problems these days, so may as well.

    2. mad.casual   3 years ago

      And to think, Jeff thought I was being unduly semantic when I asserted that teachers were sexually abusing kids when by teaching them about gender identity rather than doing their jobs and teaching them reading, math, or science.

    3. Derp-o-Matic 6000   3 years ago

      The Narrative must be preserved at all costs. If we have to change the meaning of words in order to match reality, so be it!

    4. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

      Makes me think of that Norm joke about how when he was a kid he was always told "the children are our future" and then when he grew up and said "here I am, what do I get?" he was told to fuck off those, new kids are the future now.

      1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        I think that may have originally been a George Carlin joke, only he said children are not the future, because by the time the future becomes the present, the children have grown up and are no longer children.

    5. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

      Don't worry the progs are also redefining child abuse to not include molestation and chemical castration.

      Hooray for Joe Jackson! He was really ahead of his time by drugging michel

    6. mpercy   3 years ago

      "I don't know what you mean by 'glory,' " Alice said.
      Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. "Of course you don't—till I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'"
      "But 'glory' doesn't mean 'a nice knock-down argument'," Alice objected.
      "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less."
      "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
      "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master—that's all."
      Alice was too much puzzled to say anything, so after a minute Humpty Dumpty began again. "They've a temper, some of them—particularly verbs, they're the proudest—adjectives you can do anything with, but not verbs—however, I can manage the whole lot! Impenetrability! That's what I say!"

    7. CE   3 years ago

      But saddling the youngest generation with 30 trillion in debt is "fighting inflation".

    8. EISTAU Gree-Vance   3 years ago

      “Let’s scare the fuck out of the kiddos and lay a massive guilt trip on them for merely existing.”

      The chron is right, there is some child abuse going on. I mean just look at Greta. Yikes.

      1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair™. Amirite?

        HEE HAW Gloom Despair And Agony On Me | Classic Hee Haw TV
        https://youtu.be/-IIKE9p5SEw

  42. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

    "U.S. Kills Al Qaeda Leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri. Will It Matter?"

    Shockingly different attitude from when Trump droned Qassem Soleimani and all the Reasonistas were totally sure he just started WW3.

    1. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

      This continues the long Reason tradition of having a foreign policy stance of being sort of bitchy and condescending.

    2. Tony   3 years ago

      I don't know if you know this, but Iran is not the same thing as al Qaeda.

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        So Trump did start WW3? JFC you’re pathetic.

  43. Unicorn Abattoir   3 years ago

    Pelosi just touched down in Taiwan, so the nukes should start falling on our cities in 28 minutes or so.

    Or nothing will happen.

    1. Yatusabes   3 years ago

      that's one way to erase the Democrat party and relegate them into the history books of America. Besides, most of the major cities are shit holes run by Democrats and Soros DAs, so its a win win situation

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      It's important to remember that Gingrich made that trip back in... 97 and the Chinese weren't happy, then Clinton sent in an aircraft carrier and everyone shut up. Admittedly, China was a bit of a different country back then. So we'll see how this plays out.

      1. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

        I can't help but wondering how much damage the dumb one-China and strategic ambiguity polices have done. It's been a patent falsehood since at least when Nixon declared it and China was a much weaker country back then.
        I really wonder how much of politics and international relations is able to be cleared up by simply choosing to live not by lies.

        I know there would have been tension then, but we see how often these things compound over and over. Shit, how much of the Covid anger is related to the fact that our government refused to be honest and instead tried to say what they think they needed to say to corral the people?
        Drives me nuts.

        1. Moonrocks   3 years ago

          It's been a patent falsehood since at least when Nixon declared it and China was a much weaker country back then.

          That was a patent falsehood that Taiwan itself insisted on. The change in Taiwan's stance from jealously guarding the One China theater to flirting with independence happened only in the last couple of years.

    3. Nardz   3 years ago

      Doubt anything happens.
      China has other ways to make our lives miserable, and going kinetic opens them up to exposure.
      Right now they have this big bad military with shiny new weapons that everyone can look at and imagine how formidable it might be. That perception I'd valuable.
      Last time China took on any real opponent was 50 years ago, and they got embarrassed.

      1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        You mean the same Red China allied with Putin? 🙂

        By the bye, the way everyone uses the term "kinetic" nowadays is so ridiculous.

        If the temperature is not Absolute Zero (−273.15° Celsius scale or −459.67° Fahrenheit or 0° Kelvin,) then everything is kinetic!

  44. The Margrave of Azilia   3 years ago

    So long, Saruman.

    1. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

      Yes, it's important for us to never forget Christopher Lee and his contributions to our world.

      Take a chance today to listen to the first part of his two-part Power Metal Album:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlemagne:_By_the_Sword_and_the_Cross

      1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        Dracula was Charlemagne and performed Power Metal? Thanks! I learned something new today! 🙂

        Mind you, I don't venerate Charlemagne any more than Dracula or Zawahiri. My heroes make life flourish and improve.

        1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

          I give Charlemagne major props for being the guy who got people to use upper and lower case in writing.

  45. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

    Biden spun the hit as a matter of justice and resolve, saying it was a symbol of how U.S. intelligence officials "never forget" and have "extraordinary persistence."

    That's a nice way of saying that it took them a really long time to carry this out.

    Well, that certainly is a bitchy take.

    1. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

      Ah yes, line breaks kill html tags now.

  46. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1554484275097079812?t=4DhiN-iylLl-tGbeXvLhAg&s=19

    No major power in the history of the world would allow a foreign-born billionaire to intentionally cause death and destruction within its borders.

    America allows him to do it and brag about it in our newspapers. That’s why we won’t be here 100 years from now.

    [Link]

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      Perhaps Michael Shellenberger can write a response.

      1. Nardz   3 years ago

        https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1554517026458173440?t=VlCOJWOcSi7hNlXiajgY8A&s=19

        Civilization was nice while it lasted

        [Link]

  47. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

    implemented a ban on abortion starting at six weeks of pregnancy (Georgia, Ohio, South Carolina and Tennessee),

    I've never been able to understand how six weeks isn't a long enough time to figure out you're pregnant. If you think you could be pregnant, take a test and then go get an abortion. How is this that hard?

    1. Cyto   3 years ago

      That is pretty easy...

      You count pregnancy from the first day of your last period. You have to have missed a period to suspect you are pregnant, particularly if you are not trying to get pregnant.

      So, of your period is extremely regular, you might notice and suspect you are pregnant at maybe 4.5 to 5 weeks pregnant, at best.

      If your periods are normally irregular. It could be quite a bit longer. If you are not paying attention, have irregular periods or have been gaining weight anyway. 8-12 weeks might not be a crazy amount of time to fail to notice.

  48. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

    (Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Texas) or implemented a ban on abortion starting at six weeks of pregnancy (Georgia, Ohio, South Carolina and Tennessee),

    So basically any one in any of these states can go take an afternoon drive to go get an abortion except for Texans.

    1. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

      Texans have to take a fun weekend trip.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

        That's what got them into this mess in the first place!

        1. BestUsedCarSales   3 years ago

          That first trip was to Mexico.
          This next trip is to New Mexico.

  49. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    OMG ENB is still hawking that awful 'unpopulist' site?

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      This article is highlarious.

      D.C. National Guard’s deployment and disempower President Trump, rendering it harder for him to use the guard to engineer a “Reichstag moment” of the kind Adolf Hitler manufactured in 1933 to seize dictatorial power in Germany

      1. Moonrocks   3 years ago

        Oh, the ironing.

      2. Nardz   3 years ago

        Iron law of leftists: confession by projection

  50. IceTrey   3 years ago

    "while an invasion of the cherished U.S. Capitol Building drove members of Congress, the first branch of government, from their chambers during the performance of a prescribed constitutional duty"
    Except Congress had been evacuated because of the pipe bombs before Trump even finished his speech.

    1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      Yes, but the narrative.

  51. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

    Are the Democrats building an army to hunt republicans?

    @SpeakerPelosi and @SenSchumer are building their own army of federal prosecutors.
    How is it constitutional for federal prosecutors to report to Congress? And federal prosecutors manage law-enforcement officers; not vice-versa.
    Dangerous precedent.

    https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1554233570004123648

    1. Super Scary   3 years ago

      "Are the Democrats building an army to hunt republicans?"

      The Jan 6th committee hearings have been going on for months at this point.

  52. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

    I see Reason is cooperating with The Narrative by not mentioning that Reffitt did not enter the Capitol building.

    1. Joe Friday   3 years ago

      Sympathies to all the regular posters here saddened by the death of Zawahiri, a clear victory for justice and American vengeance for 9/11. I know it's a tough day for you, but chin up.

      1. Marshal   3 years ago

        I'm so old I remember when leftists pretended to believe it was wrong to call your opponents terrorist supporters. Of course we knew even then they were trying to delegitimize accurate criticism of themselves. As he demonstrates today they never believed that should be a universal principle.

        1. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

          that was before they all became terrorist supporters...

        2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

          Joe's just trying to redirect the conversation, as Vernon Depner had a valid point about Reffitt that makes the whole thing look fascist and punitive.

      2. Moonrocks   3 years ago

        You're celebrating the murder of an Austere Religious Scholar?

      3. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        I'm only saddened that Al-Qaeda and the Islamic worldview didn't vaporize with Al-Zawahiri...Then assholes like you wouldn't have anyone to pander to while sitting in the dark begging for more heat that's not coming from "Green" energy.

  53. Moderation4ever   3 years ago

    It is interesting that both Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahri were found in cities and not in some cave in the mountains. While men like these speak of living like the people, they seem to enjoy the fruit of wealthy living. What this may tell the next leader is that it better to stay in the caves. It is also noteworthy that the Taliban leaders like the better things also.

    1. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

      The handlers of these terrorist "leaders" want to keep them where they can keep an eye on them, not hiding in the wilderness somewhere.

  54. Jerry B.   3 years ago

    People commit firearms-related crimes in D.C. all the time, up to and including shooting folks, and are generally out on the street on bail shortly after, and usually plead down to a misdemeanor with little or no jail time. Guess the District's government doesn't want its voters in jail.

    1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

      Marion Barry was reelected as Mayor of DC after> his conviction and prison term for smoking crack with a hooker.

    2. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      “Nestler also noted that Reffitt was convicted of having a handgun on his hip while on the Capitol grounds..”

      It is disingenuous to compare a gun on Capitol ground to a gun somewhere in DC.

      1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        Mike earlier: "The guy carried a gun into the capitol."

        Mike now: "The guy carried a gun on the capitol grounds."

        Mike in 10: "Okay, it wasn't on the capitol grounds exactly, but for all intents and purposes."

        A few hours ago he was gloating about this being our fire extinguisher.

  55. Jerry B.   3 years ago

    Good news for Al Qaeda!!! Everyone gets a promotion.

  56. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

    Amazing:

    "While we send our prayers, and our love, we also, with each day, renew our commitment to the urgency of now and the ability that we have collectively, all of us in it together, to do something about it."

    https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1554204681567703041

    1. Super Scary   3 years ago

      Gotta love it when they are fine with sending prayers at one time and, at other times, it's something to be mocked as "doing nothing."

      1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        Prayer is doing nothing with clasped hands and no brain. Virtue Signalling doing nothing with jazz hands and no brain. Actually getting things done requires pupaseful hands and all brain.

        Krunkt Kacklin's Kammie must have been having a cross-ideology, ecumenical knot-on-a-log moment. Mad Cow Disease might do that. 🙂

        1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

          Correction: purposeful hands and all brain...like here. 🙂

    2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

      I believe what she was trying to communicate was prayer hands, heart, keep it 100%.

  57. Personcommenting   3 years ago

    Did I just read a blurb that could be summoned up as 'stores close down once item they sold became illegal?'

    How the hell is it "news" that abortion clinics closed in states that now ban abortion?

    1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      If the government passed a law that selling automobiles is illegal, and there was a news story about dealerships closing, you would not make the same observation. You just happen to like this particular law.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   3 years ago

        It is already illegal to sell an automobile that has a bear in the trunk.

    2. Vernon Depner   3 years ago

      The wokesters are surprised that people are obeying the illegitimate Supreme Court.

  58. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

    Wow. The White House just threw Zelensky under the bus and ran him over, via their NYT stenographer.

    https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1554295873059840000

  59. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

    PayPal unfreezes Moms for Liberty funds after DeSantis announces crackdown on 'woke' banking

    https://twitter.com/FLVoiceNews/status/1554233011834654726

  60. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

    From the Shrike school of economic sophistry. See if you can spot the problem for Paul:

    Paul Krugman
    @paulkrugman
    Since I get lots of mockery for having talked about a "Biden boom", I thought I'd share a chart.
    [chart]

    https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1554163678534066177

  61. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

    Russia puzzled by Biden proposal to replace nuclear arms treaty.

    “Is this a serious statement or has the White House website been hacked?” a Russian foreign ministry source told Reuters. “If this is still a serious intention, with whom exactly do they intend to discuss it?”

    https://nationalpost.com/pmn/health-pmn/russia-puzzled-by-biden-proposal-to-replace-nuclear-arms-treaty

  62. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

    Too late:

    Iran vows to build nukes if provoked, turn NY into ‘hellish ruins’

    Can't out-Democrat the Democrats, Iran.

  63. Tony   3 years ago

    It is unfair to Republicans for Democrats to display competent governing. It say so right there in the handbook: "Republicans wave their dicks around, slaughter a few hundred thousand innocents, and you're supposed to be stupid enough to mistake that for good foreign policy."

    1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      I think everyone would be relieved to see the Democrats display some competent governing. It'd be a refreshing change from the psychotic clownshow they've embarked on.

      "Republicans wave their dicks around, slaughter a few hundred thousand innocents"

      Yes, because look at all the wars Trump started and all the dron... oops.

    2. R Mac   3 years ago

      More projection from the fascist asshole.

  64. AltheDago   3 years ago

    There was no particular need to target Zawahiri at this late date. He's been irrelevant for years and would likely have died soon anyway. This is a transparent attempt by the Biden Administration to look tough on terrorism when they're really not tough on much of anything at all.

  65. Jerry B.   3 years ago

    BBC says Al Zawahiri may have been killed by a bladed missile with no warhead.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62400923

  66. Travis R   3 years ago

    If you don't know by now that the official 9-11 story is false there is no saving you.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!