A Judge Sent Kris Kobach Back to Law School. Now He Wants To Be Kansas' Attorney General.
Kobach did such a poor job defending his state's immigration law, the judge sentenced him to remedial law courses.

After almost no primaries in July, five states are holding elections today. While national races for U.S. House and Senate seats will garner much attention, a familiar face in the Republican race for Kansas attorney general should worry libertarians.
The state's current attorney general, Derek Schmidt, a Republican, is running for governor instead of seeking another term. Three Republicans are competing for the party's nomination—and, in a state that leans Republican by more than 20 points, likely the position. One of those candidates, Kris Kobach, is familiar to Kansas voters, who have rejected him at the ballot box twice in the past four years.
Kobach first made headlines in 2010, when he was elected secretary of state. Kobach previously helped draft anti-immigration ordinances in various cities and states, either by advising legislators or by writing the laws himself. In his run for office, he said voter fraud in Kansas was rampant and committed mostly by illegal immigrants. After four years in office, he had identified only six potential cases of voter fraud, resulting in just a single conviction.
The same year Kobach was elected, Arizona passed S.B. 1070, which required state and local authorities to inquire about someone's immigration status if there was "reasonable suspicion" they were undocumented. Kobach not only helped draft the bill, but also received more than $300 an hour from the sheriff's office in Maricopa County to train its deputies on immigration enforcement.
In 2012, the Supreme Court struck down the majority of the law. A ProPublica investigation determined that between 2005 and 2018, Kobach was paid more than $800,000 for drafting anti-immigration laws and ordinances, and then defending the laws in court when challenged. Most of the laws were overturned, sometimes at overwhelming expense to the towns which had passed them.
In 2018, a federal judge overturned a 2013 Kansas voting law. Kobach had insisted the law was necessary to combat voter fraud. Despite finding fewer than 40 cases of voter fraud, nearly 50,000 legal Kansans either had their voter registrations revoked or were prevented from registering in the first place. The judge even ordered Kobach to take six hours of remedial legal courses based on his poor court performance. (Kobach still brags about the law on his campaign website.)
In 2017, despite Kobach's poor batting average, he was appointed by President Donald Trump to head up the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, along with Vice President Mike Pence. The commission was formed largely to sate Trump's delusions of widespread voter fraud in an election he won. The commission was ultimately dissolved after less than a year.
While co-chairing, Kobach also advised Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross to add a citizenship question to the decennial U.S. Census. Kobach advised that the question was necessary to keep non-citizens from being counted for congressional apportionment, despite clear constitutional and Supreme Court precedent that apportionment includes all residents, not just citizens. If allowed, it would have led to massive undercounting and distorted congressional maps. In defending his suggestion, Kobach even admitted that apportionment was the issue, saying that maps in states like California were "inflated by counting illegal aliens."
Now, Kobach hopes to be the Republican Party's nominee for attorney general. Will Kansans send him packing for the third time in a row?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It would be appropriate were his middle name to be Kleagle.
O man where is Daivd Behar when you need him?!?
..a familiar face in the Republican race for Kansas attorney general should worry libertarians.
What are you talking about? True libertarians are Republicans. Anyone who says different is a leftist.
I can’t tell if this is sarcasm anymore.
It isnt. He doesn't understand what sarcasm is. Sarcastro at volokh has the same problem. Both unfunny leftists.
What's worst about sarcasmic is that sometimes he pretends to say something useful, sometimes he pretends to be responding, and sometimes he pretends to be sarcastic. But they are all so mixed up that you can't tell, even when he tells you what he meant, because that is confused and mixed up itself.
Lifelong severe alcoholism takes it’s toll.
He’s a truly broken man.
Fuck free trade and immigration reform and police reform and ending the drug war and all of that leftist nonsense.
True liberty, the liberty that Republicans support, means lower taxes and gun rights.
Anyone who disagrees is a leftist.
Uh….whatever.
I really hope, for your sake sarc, this isn’t meant to be funny.
Hopefully after Biden expands the Supreme Court we'll get a new SUPER-PRECEDENT declaring all "border enforcement" unconstitutional.
#OpenBordersWillFixEverything
#CheapLaborAboveAll
Libertarians want rights but arent willing to die for them.
Remember when a police officer beat up a commenters mom at a soccer game and when they reached out to Reason to bring light to it, they were told that it was "too local" of an issue.
So, how's that fit with thrice failed candidates for a government position in a state that Reason couldn't give two shits about?
I was going to ask the same thing. What a weird decision for an article. Apparently more important than any of the examples of ESG effects on global food markets.
Obviously it's because Reason is run by leftists. What other explanation is there?
It's because it touches somewhat upon their hobby horse of immigration.
People can call that leftist if they want, but I believe the criticisms of Reason are more specific than that. One of which is, they have a few ends they focus on exclusively.
Weed because that's the libertarians one win they feel they can claim.
Immigration because it's their core topic of concern.
I think this is normal since Reason is a small group based around opinion journalism. I bring up the old story of the Glibenning (It was Sloopy's elderly mother who was beaten, iirc) because that was well within their wheelhouse (police brutality) but was deemed too local.
Well, here we have a bland hit-piece about a whothefuckcares candidate, for a secondary executive position, in a state they would likely openly admit to not caring about. It's just a shit article.
Liberty means lower taxes and gun rights. All other liberty is leftist drivel according to the people in the comments. Free trade? Leftist. Immigration? Leftist. Police reform? Leftist. If it's not on the Republican Party Platform, it's leftist.
So, no response at all to my comment. I even made a point that I'm not calling them leftist and try to specify my criticism.
OK, I'll bite. The 1972 LP platform contained the main sentence that was copied into the Roe v Wade decision soon after the real votes were counted. THAT is a win. Our vote share increased 12% per year until crawfishing cowardice set in in the 1980s--copied from cowardice precedent set in 1839. Vote share flatlined until Gary and Whutzisname ran on a pro-choice ticket and tripled our clout. Now we have to start over and reset back to the 1972 platform. Happy now?
Your presence wasn’t requested, required or in any way necessary or valuable.
Have the staff secured all the sharp scissors Hank?
According to Reason, liberty means extracting taxes from citizens to forward welfare benefits to non-citizens and then wonders why the third world is crashing our borders. Literally.
And don't forget the absurd notion of bitches having the same rights as individuals! That is straight out of The Red Republican playbook and part of comrade Beecher Stowe's Jacobin commie plot! Nothing in the Wholly Bauble says that slavery is wrong, so the 13th Amendment couldn't possibly apply to forcing young women into involuntary reproduction or conscripting young men into minefields and sniper crosshairs. The very idEA! Harrumph.
Ok, you’ve had no your nonsensical rant. Now fuck off.
What’s up with the sock though Hank?
https://libertariantranslator.wordpress.com/who-is-hank-phillips/
"we have a bland hit-piece about a whothefuckcares candidate, for a secondary executive position, in a state they would likely openly admit to not caring about"
Kris Kobach gained himself global notoriety when he was such a bad lawyer he got himself ordered back to law school. This story is likely to make the pages of various European newspapers. Not because anyone cares what happens in Idaho, Dakota, wherever the f this is, but because it's extremely funny he's now running for _attorney general_.
Reason has hired actual libertarian women now and then, not Gee Oh Pee harridans. (https://bit.ly/3vCqgWN)
Why’d you change your name Hank?
Right?
Also, what drugs you doing tonight Hank?
What? No coverage of the West Virginia recall?
Once again Reason has outed themselves as leftists for failing to cover that story. If they do cover it in the future they're just back peddling, lying, and covering their leftist asses.
Damn, missed sarc going full sqrlsy this afternoon.
Are they trying to recall Manchin for bowing down to Schumer?
I wish judges would sentence Reason authors to go back to remedial writing and journalism school.
Joe Lancaster is just awful.
One of those candidates, Kris Kobach, is familiar to Kansas voters, who have rejected him at the ballot box twice in the past four years.
My first thought was, "Ok, then why are we so worried about this guy"? Then I remembered Joe Biden's win in 2020. So, fair play.
I don't know why Kobach was required to study legal procedure again, but I do know that the judge who made him do that is a leftist bully. Possibly Kobach needed a refresher course, but also possibly the judge acted just out of spite.
The world is full of successful bad lawyers.
Three that quickly come to mind:
Joe Biden
Kamala Harris
Tony Villaraigosa
Trump spelt it out as clear as can be spelt: If the Grab Others' Pussies party gets tossed out on its fat ass or loses any power to coerce obedience, THAT is, ipso facto, voter fraud and robbery!
Did that okay well with the kids when you were trying to lure them into your windowless van?
Isn't this the guy Trump hired in 2017 to find the massive voter fraud and he didn't find any? Oops.
It's not that he didn't find any, he gave up because the ones, who should have been proud to show how honest they were, wouldn't give out any information.
It's hard to find something when the people doing the cheating, get to withhold the data from being investigated.
Same, same as in the 2020 stolen election.
Oh. Lol.
TDS-addled assholes find any reason they can to mention the object of their obsession.
Stuff your TDS up your ass, shitpile; your head wants company.
Gonna have to send you back to Bitch School
Kobach just needs to assure the women of Kansas that they will be able to terminate pregnancy at any time for any "REASON" and he is ready to go
Yes lets have all the leftist on here aborted. At any time for any reason.
The Supreme Court did NOT "strike down a majority of" Arizona's SB1070. The bill had roughly a dozen major sections; one section was invalidated by the courts. Even the provisions requiring officers to ask about immigration status were not actually struck down. What was challenged and struck down was the state enforcement process that would be based on findings from the inquiry.
This kind of exaggeration seems typical on this site. I don't think it's malevolent, but comes from failing to fully recognize the power of leftist propaganda. The leftists and their media allies lie so prolifically that it's difficult for writers to know what to accept and what to check. A large percentage of the false propaganda comes to be accepted as fact just from repetition.