OnlyFans Star Aella Talks Sex Work Economics
How sex worker Aella went from factory work to OnlyFans stardom and data science research on fetishes

An outspoken defender of sex worker rights, Aella is a former factory worker who never graduated college. At one point, she was one of the most successful and best-known creators on the adult subscription site OnlyFans, earning more than $100,000 per month. She has now pivoted to doing data science research full time, with an emphasis on sexual fetishes. In March, she spoke with Reason's Liz Wolfe about her work as an escort and a cam girl, the class distinctions in different types of sex work, and why the most successful sex workers are selling much more than sex.
Q: What was camming like when you first got started?
A: Really scary, because I had come from an extremely conservative culture. We were Calvinists. My dad is a professional evangelical debater. So, when I started camming, I made $60 the first night, and I was like, "This is more money for four hours of work than I've seen in my lifetime." I was extremely excited, and it was something where I could actually see results from working really hard, and that was the first time I'd been put into a system where I could work really hard and have concrete results from it.
Q: What did your business model look like for escorting and camming?
A: With camming, most of the income comes from a small percentage of men, because the men are visible to each other. There's much higher competition. As a guy, if you're tipping the girl or giving her money, it's in front of other men. It's very competition-oriented, so you end up with a system where 80 percent of your money comes from two guys. This leads to a lot of vulnerability for emotional abuse too. If all of your money is coming from just a handful of guys, then they can make a lot of demands of you. Whereas with escorting, that's not the case at all, because the guys are not visible to each other. They're not competing against each other in any way. Your income is much more distributed across men.
Q: Have you learned what your clients respond well to?
A: Men want personality. They really do. And there's some sort of fantasy that you're selling the guy on. Like, I'm not just a body for you to fuck. I'm some sort of escapism that you can fall in love with for a night, who's warm and bubbly and fun to be around and makes you feel great about yourself. And there's a little bit of therapy involved too. One aspect of selling sex to men is that you're selling them an identity about themselves.
Q: Could you explain the class differences in types of sex work?
A: I did a survey of a bunch of escorts and found that the amount of bad things they encountered, like sexual assault, or theft, or police, or whatever, was pretty strongly correlated with their price range. Basically, the more money you charge, you're pricing yourself out of more sketchy clientele. The people who are going to be paying you $1,000 an hour are not going to sexually assault you. They're a lawyer or a doctor or a politician or someone who just doesn't want to mess with that.
Q: What has this dual identity as a sex worker and data scientist been like for you?
A: I think I'm really good at deeply understanding correlations and the ways that data can lie to you. I'm surprised more sex workers aren't also data scientists.
This is also selling the guys an identity for who they want to be. If you're like, "Hey, I'm a sex worker. And also, I do data," they're like, "Wow, I'm such a high-end guy that I am attracted to this hot woman who also does data. Look how deep I am."
This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity. For a video version, visit reason.com.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Aella on Sex Work Economics."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good morning Peanuts! Have I mentioned GDP is a completely worthless metric? It stopped mattering the minute I could no longer use it to blame Trump for the 2020 economic catastrophe. Now that Biden is President we must assess the strength of the economy by looking at the net worths of liberal capitalists like Warren Buffett to see if they increased in the past 24 hours. If the answer is yes, it means Biden is doing a great job.
#TemporarilyFillingInForButtplug
Paul Krugman, is that you?
How much is a years worth of your location data worth (tracked illegally)? Tim Hortons thinks it is worth a donut and a coffee.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/technology/tim-hortons-free-pastries-coffee-settlement
I'm a Tim Horton's app user. I'm actually drinking their coffee right now...
"As part of the proposed settlement agreement, eligible app users will receive a free hot beverage and a free baked good,"
Huh, I don't know how I should feel about that. I mean a free coffee, wow!
"The users will receive a free hot beverage with a retail value of 6.19 Canadian dollars, and a pastry valued at 2.39 Canadian dollars."
Something is odd here. They don't make a hot beverage with a with a retail value higher than 2.50 Canadian dollars.
Tim's started getting sketchy when they got bought out by Burger King.
Replace white with any other race in Angry White Male course offering.
https://campusreform.org/article?id=19885
So the professor has a few publications:
France and the Fattened American: Animality, Consumption, and the Logic of
Fat: Culture and Materiality
The Qualities of Fat: Bodies, History, and Materiality
Melting Moments: The Greasy Sources of Modern Perceptions of Fat.
Fat, Desire, and Disgust in the Colonial Imagination.
Manhood Incorporated: Diet and the Embodiment of 'Civilized' Masculinity.
Cultures of the Abdomen: Diet, Digestion and Fat in the Modern World
He seems to write a whole lot about fat men. I have to question what kind of value he's adding to a teaching staff.
So he’s a gay man that likes to go hogging?
None, like all humanities studies
No doubt a course that will be filled with fat purple haired gender non-conforming women.
But ya, imagine an "Angry Black Man" class and the mass hysteria it would cause today
“Imagine an Angry Black Man class”
So a class about the history of the Black Panthers, Malcolm X, and the radical wing of the civil rights movement in the 1960s? It sounds like it would be an interesting class.
Reason 2075:
White Diversity - Is It Everything It's Cracked Up To Be?
With authoritarian notions like punctuality, reward for personal autonomy, impartial justice, and 'objective' sciences should libertarians be so quick to embrace such racially-motivated ideology?
by Fiona Harrigan Jr.
With White History Departments spring up at college campuses all over the country, a counterculture of white revolution has taken hold of private education, but should this oppressive ideology be embraced? Founded on the ideas of violent slave owners from the early 1600s to late 1700s immigrants from around the world are being imported and forced to virtue signal in this latest iteration of the pernicious culture war...
*golf clap*
How bad has it gotten that I could buy that as a legitimate headline and article here?
How about the ultimate case- the angry black female.
Why does she fight at buffets? Why does she twerk after an assault?
Time to get rid of the left. There is no logical reason to tolerate them anymore.
American rights > democrat lives
Like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, White Males may look meek, polite, and civilized, but get them Angry and all that changes. Angry White Males raided the coastlines, Angry White Males conquered continents, Angry White Males won the World Wars, and Angry White Males start revolutions and kill off their would-be masters. It's not so much a question of skin color, but of culture and tradition.
Learn history or be doomed to repeat it.
The scummy vermin in the far left media is having a big time freakout because the republican party looks like they're on the verge of (finally) no longer allowing them to try picking their candidates:
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/ron-desantis-blocking-legacy-media-coverage-dangerous-democracy-n1297607
I absolutely love this. My only question is: what the hell took you guys so damn long? Loving DeSantis more and more all the time.
Why won't you work with us to lie and attack you asked the media.
Looking forward to him owning the libs all he way to the WH
Smart.
The corporatist media became their sworn enemies at least a decade ago. Why engage with a group that exists solely to harm you and propagandize for their paymasters?
They brought this on themselves.
It's not like plenty of alternate media doesn't exist, and it's not like the corporatist's won't have access to actual news. Just that they won't get to interview to the R's anymore.
Also, didn't Obama do this but worse with Fox?
Yeah, you’ve got to be as dishonest or naïve as a Reason editor to not admit MSM is Democrat propaganda at this point.
So is Reason
According to reason, democrats claiming totalitarian power is only bad because a republican might get elected
Rufo revealed this week that Portland Public Schools’ lesson plans for your K-5-aged children include pictures of naked people and close-ups of penises; teaches that there are five genders; and blames “white colonizers” for the belief that sexuality matches a person’s plumbing.
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2022/07/30/west-coast-messed-coast-yeah-those-mail-in-ballots-are-totally-safe-edition-n1617048
Not grooming right jeff?
Teachers are told to eliminate the terms “girls and boys,” “ladies and gentlemen,” “mom and dad,” “Mrs. Mr., Miss,” and “boyfriend, girlfriend,” in favor of terms such as “people,” “folx,” “guardians,” “Mx.,” and “themfriend.” Students are shown photographs of “gender non-conforming” individuals and encouraged to celebrate the flags for “nonbinary,” “genderqueer,” “gender fluid,” and “Two-Spirit” identities. For some students, the subversion of the gender binary might also involve a gender transition. The curriculum provides a detailed explanation of how to “pause puberty” through “hormones and/or surgeries” and advice on adopting a “nonbinary” identity and set of pronouns.
https://www.city-journal.org/in-portland-the-sexual-revolution-starts-in-kindergarten
Most 6 year olds would think of this stuff on their own, right? So its perfectly natural that they would then want to embrace a new identity, overcome the stifling constraints imposed by the patriarchy in the past 100 years, and enjoy the "fluidity" that primates and other mammals evolved with for millions of years.
I love that the guy from daily wire went and asked Kenyan tribes about this stuff and how much they laughed about the concept.
This is a mental illness that comes from decadence. A disease of wealthy white liberals who haven't experienced real strife.
Eventually in this country what will likely happen is it comes up against hispanic conservatives (and centrists) and a landslide election happens due to it.
I think it more likely they will run headfirst into fiscal reality. They have been coasting so far on their parents paying tuition, kicking the student loan can down the road until it can all be forgiven, and ballooning national debt. Reality is going to hit soon, and all the climate spending will hurry it up.
This inflation is just the start. When there is no more money to borrow, when the federal interest payments alone break the bank, something's got to give, and they will be out of other people's money overnight.
They can fantasize about Magical Money Theory all they want; it is fiscally impossible.
One indicator of their fragile "consensus" is all those polls showing that as soon as cost comes into the picture, climate catastrophe goes to the bottom. Another is the TV show Yellowstone doing so well while being snubbed by Hollywood, Disney's CEO repudiating his woke predecessor, Netflix telling its woke employees it may not be the company they want. All are indications of fiscal reality trumping wokistry.
Eh, they’ll just blame the kulaks.
^ This
"It not our fault, it's evil Rethuglican evangelicals. Let's go burn down a church"
I'm not resorting to hyperbole either. Tony was blaming Christians for all his fuck-ups yesterday.
https://reason.com/2022/07/29/recession-facebook-fact-check-biden-politifact/?comments=true#comment-9625754
Doesn't matter who they blame. They can't fool fiscal reality. When they run out of other people's money, that's the end.
The feds spent $500B on interest payments in 2020. It must be close to $1T this year or next, 20-25% of the federal budget. It's not sustainable.
like the mass amount of examples given to him about CRT in schools, he will ignore it, pretend he never saw it, and come back tomorrow with the same gaslighting
That's how you know he's being paid.
Nobody else would keep pushing the exact same discredited propaganda, over and over again, day after day, in the face of countless refutations, without being paid.
Everyone claiming the election was "stolen" is getting paid? That explains a lot.
Well one thing we're certain of is that you're far too fucking stupid to be getting paid.
Tell me sarcasmic, why, when the subject was child castration and CRT, would you suddenly pretend we were talking about the election?
Did you think that nobody would catch your misdirection?
Just make stuff up and argue against it. You don't need me for that.
Actually we kind of do. Can't let Jeff have a monopoly.
Nobody else would keep pushing the exact same discredited propaganda, over and over again, day after day, in the face of countless refutations, without being paid.
So you're getting paid to push STOLEN ELECTION propaganda. Got it.
Me: "why, when the subject was child castration and CRT, would you suddenly pretend we were talking about the election?
Did you think that nobody would catch your misdirection?"
Jeff: "So you're getting paid to push STOLEN ELECTION propaganda."
That's pathetic even for you. You want to try again?
I see you didn't deny it. That must mean it's true.
How much are you getting paid?
"I see you didn't deny it. That must mean it's true."
Not only denied, but I refuted you through quotes. It's not like you're even reading before responding any more.
Did Media Matters fire you and replace you with a bot?
ML: "When I make a general claim, such as 'nobody else would keep pushing the exact same discredited propaganda, over and over again, day after day, in the face of countless refutations, without being paid', it should be understood that I am lying because I will never accept my own claim applied to myself."
Is it even physically possible for you to respond without inventing dialogue that suits you and attacking that instead?
ML: "Since I hate chemjeff so much I simply cannot let him get the last word, so I will just continue to whine and whine. And then tomorrow I will push STOLEN ELECTION propaganda while pretending I'm not being paid to do so."
Apparently not.
Jeffy, you are one soft headed fatass moron. You’ve really got nothing. Just a stupid pedophile enthusiast Marxist.
I’ll bet that bottle of Drano is starting to look good to you. So just do it.
Usually it is cute when a couple adopts each others habits and behaviors.
Just creepy here.
At least with Dee he was white knighting for the possibility of pussy.
With Jeff the best he's going to get is an obese man's unwiped asshole.
Or a pre pubescent boy. But he’s too frail to pay the troll’s toll to get inside that baby boy’s hole.
So Lying Jeffy and sarc still haven’t acknowledged the court cases that have ruled election law changes illegal in multiple states?
Of course not. That would require honesty.
Why do you come here? You’re just a broken, drunk joke. You’re not even a libertarian. You frequently side with our oppressors.
Just crawl back into to your bottle and never come out. You have nothing to live for.
They-er than a twirler in a gay pride parade. More genderqueer than a football bat.
Jeff is going to selectively ignore this, and come tomorrow repeat his same old talking points insisting that this doesn't happen.
What's the grooming part?
Are there any depictions of graphic sex?
Are there any descriptions of sex acts?
Are there pictures of men getting blowjobs?
Does it say "if your teacher touches your private parts, don't tell your parents"? Actually, this is what the slides say:
"Some people call middle parts your private parts, but any part of your body can be private. Private means you only show people you trust and help you stay healthy, like your parents or your doctor. Only you get to decide who touches and looks at your body."
OMG the horror!
Is the curriculum being "hidden" from parents? They can't be too hidden if Rufo was able to get a hold of them.
Oh wait I know! It's "grooming" because kids are being prepared to accept concepts on sex and gender and sexual orientation and gender identity that make Jesse sad. Kids who are taught a curriculum that doesn't have the Right-Wing Seal of Approval is "GROOMING!" and no different than child sexual abuse. I get it. This is just another manifestation of right-wing narcissism, that the world must revolve around them, that even in left-wing Portland they must accept the right-wing viewpoint on gender otherwise they are equivalent to child abusers and pedophiles.
"Portland Public Schools’ lesson plans for your K-5-aged children include pictures of naked people and close-ups of penises"
Are you just pretending to be retarded?
They're actually not "pictures of naked people". They are cartoonish representations of a naked boy and a naked girl to illustrate anatomy.
But I get it, ML wants kids to learn about reproductive biology from the Internet, particularly Pornhub, just like how he learned it.
I'm not going to refute your statement myself, I'll let you do it.
"They're actually not "pictures of naked people". They are cartoonish representations of a naked boy and a naked girl..."
Amazing...
Let's call him hentaijeff, after all, that's what he's defending.
He’s so goddamned stupid.!
It is amazing how desperate you are to show children naked pictures.
And not just children. Five year old kindergartners. I can only hope that one day when Jeff expresses his unholy desires about children that a sane person of sufficient physical ability just reaches out and breaks his neck with their bare hands. Thus ending his pedophilic pursuits.
Pedo Jeffy advocates for sex-ed in kindergarten.
"They're actually not "pictures of naked people". They are cartoonish representations"
LMAO
OK groomer
Oh and so much for local control of schools.
If I have to tolerate Miami schools dropping their sex ed curriculum because they don't want middle schoolers learning about Plan B (even though middle schoolers sometimes do have sex and get pregnant, but whatever), then you should have to tolerate Portland schools teaching a curriculum about sexual orientation and gender identity that you don't personally approve of either.
Do you live in Portland? Do you have kids who go to school in Portland? Hmm?
"If I have to tolerate"
Haha, "tolerate". All those pedos "tolerating" not raping kids.
" because they don't want middle schoolers learning about Plan B"
Why do middle schoolers need to know about Plan B? What are you up to?
"even though middle schoolers sometimes do have sex and get pregnant, but whatever"
Plan B is a female hormone that can cause changes in the cervix. It contains levonorgestrel which can cause developmental damage in developing bodies. It's not something thirteen year old's should be packing to every pajama party, you freak.
"then you should have to tolerate Portland schools teaching a curriculum about sexual orientation and gender identity that you don't personally approve of either."
Shorter Jeff: If you don't like kids being shown porn here, you have to be okay with them showing kids porn over there.
There's no sophistry like chemjeff sophistry.
Plan B is a female hormone that can cause changes in the cervix. It contains levonorgestrel which can cause developmental damage in developing bodies. It's not something thirteen year old's should be packing to every pajama party, you freak.
ML would prefer that if 10 year olds get raped by a family member, that they remain ignorant about what to do. After all, if they are ignorant, then that 10 year old might die trying to give birth to a child that they aren't ready for, but hey, at least they weren't taught by filthy groomers about Plan B!
No longer on your "banned" list, huh? You're such a fraud.
"ML would prefer that if 10 year olds get raped by a family member, that they remain ignorant about what to do."
This is exactly what I'm talking about folks, when I say that Jeffy can't actually argue against what people have really said, so he has to rewrite and redefine it into something he can tackle.
He's always lying, always strawmanning, always creating fallacies.
He's always lying, always strawmanning, always creating fallacies.
Just giving you a taste of your own medicine.
Here jeff admits he is never responsible for his trolling. It is always someone else.
He admitted he’s lying, lol.
"NO U!!!"
Ouch, wicked burn, Jeffy.
The illegal that raped that little girl is a Chemjeff success story. He should never have been here in the first place, but you and your fellow travelers have connived, and schemed to let in as many illegals as possible. Including pedophile rapists. You yourself advocate for them coming here.
That girl was raped because of you. This is your fault. Kill yourself.
I mean, you don't want middle schoolers even learning about Plan B. That means if a 10-year-old gets raped, you want them to be completely ignorant about what to do.
How is this not a true statement?
No. 10 year olds should not be learning about plan b. They have parents they can turn to if they get pregnant. You dont want that because then the 10 year old may report you.
No. 10 year olds should not be learning about plan b. They have parents they can turn to if they get pregnant.
Should kids learn about Plan B at any age? If so, what age is that?
You understand kids have parents right? There is plenty of material out there for parents to choose to give to their kids.
Teachers do not have to be the ones teaching kids how to get abortions.
Glad you lied about me being on mute again buddy.
I seriously don't understand how a feckless and childless man can be so desperate to teach kids about sex at 10 years old.
"Should kids learn about Plan B at any age?"
No you stupid fuck. In fact it can be as dangerous as pregnancy for a young teen.
<i?"If so, what age is that?"
18+
<i?"If so, what age is that?"
18+
So, highschoolers having sex (which happens from time to time, you know) should not be taught about what to do if they get pregnant.
So as I said - if a 10-year-old gets raped, you want her to remain ignorant.
You understand kids have parents right? There is plenty of material out there for parents to choose to give to their kids.
Not every kid is blessed to live in a good home.
I seriously don't understand how a feckless and childless man can be so desperate to teach kids about sex at 10 years old.
I want kids to be able to have age-appropriate material for what to do to handle life's risks and dangers.
You would rather kids remain ignorant of what to do in the name of 'protecting' them. Overprotecting kids can do too much harm than good.
Weren't you the one complaining about Fauci's recommendations about peanut allergies, that oversterilizing households leads to kids not acquiring the antibodies they need to deal with even minor challenges like allergens in peanuts? It is the same thing here, but with age-appropriate knowledge. Overprotecting kids leads to them not having the "mental antibodies", i.e., knowledge, of knowing what to do when confronted with a risk or danger.
"So, highschoolers having sex (which happens from time to time, you know) should not be taught about what to do if they get pregnant."
They can discuss it with parents and doctors. You and your groomer pals have no business talking about sex with minors.
Teachers are some of the least qualified people to discuss sexuality.
They can discuss it with parents and doctors.
And if/when that doesn't happen?
So you don't want schools teaching students about sex ed.
You don't really care if parents teach their teenage kids about sex ed or not.
And then when teenagers do stupid shit and get pregnant, you will excoriate them for "being irresponsible".
And then you will wonder why there are so many 'losers' on welfare. "They're just brainwashed Democrat voters who want government dependency and a handout, that's it!"
Maybe an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
You want to ban gender reassignment surgery for kids, right? Because kids shouldn't be permitted to make life-altering decisions of that magnitude, even if their parents or doctors agree. Because you want to protect children. Right? And if parents defied your ban and went ahead with gender reassignment surgery for their child, you would charge the parents with child abuse, send them to jail, and take the kid away from the parents, for their own good. Do I have that correct?
Now, suppose the schools don't talk to teenagers about sex ed, and suppose the parents don't either. And so the parents, through passive neglect, look the other way while their kids engage in life-altering decisions such as having children at a very young age. What is the difference between this scenario and the former one? If the ultimate goal here should be to look out for the welfare of the child, even if it means trampling on parental rights, then what consequences should the parents face for their neglect? Hmm?
"And if/when that doesn't happen?"
"But what if?! What if?!"
If all the parents and guardians and healthcare workers and nurses and doctors fail then I guess they're fucked. But far less fucked, incidentally, than if you and your groomer pals got your paws on them.
ML: "I don't really give a shit about kids who fall through the cracks. The more important part here is to stop the groomer ideology!"
Again you can't make a cohesive argument so you make shit up.
Never change, Jeffy.
ML: "This is where I give up any pretense of actually being interested in the topic at hand and just launch my usual diatribe of insults against the person for whom I have nothing but blinding irrational hatred. Fuck the kids, fuck sex ed, who gives a shit about stupid topics like that, the real important point here is to give chemjeff a sick burn."
Jesse, in Pedo Jeffy’s tiny mind, kids only have the government to look after them. So they need to be sexualized at age five.
10 year olds are 5th graders, not middle schoolers.
Chemjeff Stalinist pedophile is way too enthusiastic about his 10 year old rape fantasy.
Literally cancer
Why are you always talking about 10 year old rape? Have something to admit?
I think we can argue with him without resorting to this kind of comment.
Besides, he makes these asinine arguments because it’s like a worst case scenario that he can try and use as a gotcha or whatever. It’s sophomoric and annoying as all fuck, but not an indication of anything more than that. Just my two cents.
No. It is an honest curiosity because he is childless but so invested in teaching young kids about sex. There is something completely wrong there.
If you had a man come up to your 10 year old and show them even drawings of naked adults you'd lose it on that person. Jeff is advocating for the same.
He also retreats constantly to the 1 in 10 million example in order to press this behavior on young children. It is entirely reasonable to ask him why he is so interested in it.
Fuck you, Jesse. Your problem is that your definition of "teaching kids about sex" is so incredibly broad that you don't want ANYTHING taught about it that even comes close to gender identity or sexual orientation.
"Hey kids, maybe gender is not the same as sex" is treated the same as "Hey kids, let's learn about blowjobs". That is Jesse's dishonesty.
So that is my problem. You and your tribe want to create such a puritanical prudish environment in school regarding sexual orientation or gender identity that the entire subject is completely forbidden even if there is no 'graphic sex talk'.
This ultimately leads to HARM to kids because they are not only unprepared for how to deal with the real world, it also reinforces the status quo as normative and implicitly teaches kids that if they are "different" in some way, that they are abnormal and weird and damaged people. Because it is not possible to keep the status quo out of the classroom - banning "discussion of sexual orientation" actually becomes banning "discussion of sexual orientation that deviates from the status quo that everyone is constantly exposed to".
This ultimately leads to HARM to kids because they are not only unprepared for how to deal with the real world
It isn't the job of government to prepare anyone "or how to deal with the real world". If you think otherwise, you aren't an individualist.
It is the job of SCHOOLS to prepare kids for the real world, whether the schools are run by the government or not.
How do you think you get voters who will vote for libertarian policy or libertarian ideals? You won't get voters like that if they don't go to school, don't learn anything, and grow up ignorant.
How do you think you get voters who will vote for libertarian policy or libertarian ideals? You won't get voters like that if they don't go to school, don't learn anything, and grow up ignorant.
Contrary to whatever you believe about school choice, it's end goal isn't more libertarianism, its whatever the parents want.
Interesting. Do you favor a system of school vouchers to facilitate school choice?
Interesting. Do you favor a system of school vouchers to facilitate school choice?
I favor giving parents more agency over education than educators.
Does that agency include school vouchers?
Oh I absolutely agree that his willingness to die on this hill is well, insane, especially if he doesn’t have kids in the system.
But, I feel like anyone can come read his posts and see the blatant sophistry and gotcha attempts. Those discredit his arguments much more effectively than the pedo and groomer insults. That’s all I was saying.
You are assuming that they are actually motivated by trying to discredit my arguments. They are not. They are motivated by calling me names and insulting me. Calling me a 'Nazi groomer pedophile' is their ENTIRE POINT.
And I appreciate that you think that the right-wing insult squad around here has finally gone too far. But that cat is way out of the bag at this point.
That is why they are so taken with Trump. Not because of policies. But because he validates their bad behavior.
Haha everything he said went flying over your head.
As an example he spent an entire weekend livid a school board denied new sex ed texts because parents objected it teaching them about gender fluidity and abortion at age 10. In a state he doesn't live in and for children who aren't his.
It isnt normal for a childless person to be so invested that they attack actual parents over it.
In a state he doesn't live in and for children who aren't his.
And you have now spent a good portion of a Sunday talking about the decisions of a school board in Portland... when did you move to Portland again?
There's your answer, DesigNate. He actually thinks I'm a pedophile and child rapist. The guy is just a complete and utter asshole.
What fuckhead started the "10 year olds get raped" business here today, Jeffy?
Do you want to be honest with DesigNate?
In case you hadn't heard, 10 year olds getting raped has been in the news lately. But you know this. But you are so dishonest that you are now going to try to insinuate that I'm accusing you of raping 10 year olds when I did no such thing.
Don't talk about it like it's a hot new trend, you dishonest fuck.
And just who was it that raped that ten year old anyway, Jeff? Want to talk about that? Maybe explain how showing her porn in school could have stopped it?
ML: "Now that everyone has realized that chemjeff didn't actually accuse me of raping anyone, and that I am the asshole here, I am going to try to change the subject."
What's this? The hundredth time today that he's had to invent dialogue because he can't actually argue against what people have really said.
ML: "I know full well that chemjeff is capable of arguing competently when he wants to, but I will never admit it publicly because of my burning hatred towards him."
Oh, I certainly despise you, but that still doesn't mean you're capable of arguing against statements that you don't invent yourself.
ML: "To pretend that I am not motivated purely by irrational hatred and spite, I will pretend to offer a good faith argument. But darn it, I didn't provide any proof of my claims! So it's just an insult masquerading as an argument! They are going to see through my deception once again!"
"I think we can argue with him without resorting to this kind of comment."
Jeff's the one who originally accused me of it, DesigNate. Jesse is quoting him.
See: https://reason.com/2022/07/31/aella-on-sex-work-economics/?comments=true#comment-9626366
"ML would prefer that if 10 year olds get raped by a family member, that they remain ignorant about what to do."
Remember, a good rule of thumb is if you think Jeff is being unfairly persecuted, always check the thread first.
You'll invariably find he started it.
Oh don't you dare try to pretend that you're the victim here after you perpetually and repeatedly call me a Nazi.
And even in that comment I didn't accuse *you* of raping 10 year olds.
Did I whine about it, Nazi? No. But by the same fucking token I'm not going to let you fool DesigNate into thinking you were being bullied.
lol you two reveal yourselves to be asshole bullies on a daily basis. case in point: Did I whine about it, Nazi?
I absolutely hate you Jeff. I think you're a Nazi paid to spread some of the most evil doctrines in human history under a mask of phony virtue.
Of course I'm an asshole to you. You're repellent. If I met your evil ass IRL I'd spit towards you.
I absolutely hate you Jeff.
Right. So it is that, along with your complete lack of integrity, which causes you to be constitutionally unable to be honest with me. Because if you were honest and had integrity, you would agree with me those times when we did actually agree. But you can't. Because that would mean "giving the Nazi a win". Which is why I am going to poke fun at you instead. There is no real point in trying to do anything else with you. So don't complain when I'm unfair and mean to you. This is what you have coming because you decided to declare total war on me. You don't get to have it both ways.
And by the way, I don't hate you. I think you actually have a brain somewhere in there, unlike Jesse whose brain was baked away long ago in an Arizona desert. I just think you've taken this online tribal thing way too far.
Pretty sure that the guy without integrity is the one who has to invent statements and put them in the mouths of others.
Pretty sure that the guy without integrity is the one who has to invent statements and put them in the mouths of others.
That's not a very nice thing to say about Jesse, but painfully accurate.
I didn’t take that comment as him accusing you of rape.
I took it as qHe was more accusing you of wanting them to not know about how to get plan b or an abortion.
Even that understanding of his comment sounds ridiculous, because as we all know, thinking that sex Ed shouldn’t be taught to elementary school kids means you want them to remain forever ignorant or something.
Another false equivalence you Pedo fatfuck. You’re talking about dove year olds here. FIVE YEAR OLD CHILDREN. You and everyone like you should burn.
If a school decided to teach kids that there were two and only two genders, that they were determined at birth by biology, that a man's social requirement to wear pants and neckties, or a woman's social requirement to wear skirts and dresses, are determined at birth by chromosomes, and that people who claim to be trans are actually confused and mentally ill and need treatment, I wonder if Jesse would consider this "grooming".
"If a school decided to teach kids that there were two and only two genders, that they were determined at birth by biology"
Which is true, factual, scientific, grounded in reality.
"that a man's social requirement to wear pants and neckties, or a woman's social requirement to wear skirts and dresses"
Here comes the strawmen and appeal to ridicule.
Literally nobody proposes this, but weasely Jeffy can't argue against the facts so he has to attach falsehoods and attack those.
Nothing this fucker says is ever in good faith.
Nothing this fucker says is ever in good faith.
Very little of what you say is in good faith, that is correct.
ML: "I want schools to teach that there are two and only two genders, but I also want schools to teach that there is no connection between genders and social norms."
Nuh uh you shouts jeff.
Jeffy, you’re a notorious serial liar, and an obvious pedophile enthusiast. You have no business condemning anyone, as you are the one who should be condemned now and always.
"ML: "I want schools to teach that there are two and only two genders, but I also want schools to teach that there is no connection between genders and social norms."
And he does it yet again. He can't actually argue against what people have really said, so he has to twist, rewrite, reword and redefine it into something else that he can tackle.
How many times today have I pointed out him doing this?
He can't help himself.
ML: "I am the only one entitled to be an asshole around here, no one else is. When someone else tries to encroach on my turf, I will whine like a bitch."
Are you doubling down, or can you just not help yourself?
So let me see if I understand the right-wing viewpoint on this stuff.
EITHER:
schools should not talk about gender identity or sexual orientation AT ALL, not even if it is non-graphic, not even if it isn't "graphic sex talk" or pornographic, the topic should be avoided completely and if the topic does happen to come up, teachers should say nothing more than "ask your parents" and change the subject and move on.
OR:
if schools are going to talk about gender identity or sexual orientation at all, they should do so in a way that reinforces traditional gender identities and gender roles and sexual orientations - that the binary man/woman heterosexual gender identities ae the normative standard and all others are 'abnormal'.
Anything different than either of these two approaches is "grooming". Is that correct folx?
Anything the left does is considered "grooming" because every leftist is a child molester. You don't need any details as to what the people are doing to decide if it's grooming or not. You just need to know their politics.
https://reason.com/2022/07/31/aella-on-sex-work-economics/?comments=true#comment-9626223
"So let me see if I understand the right-wing viewpoint on this stuff...
EITHER...
OR..."
Again we see another of Jeff's rhetorical tricks in action.
He can't actually argue against what people have really said, so he has to rewrite and redefine it into something he can tackle.
He gets called out on this weasely horseshit time and time again, but keeps plugging along because it's all he's got.
Of course sarcasmic falls for it.
ML: "I reserve the right to make up any definition of 'grooming' that I wish, on the fly, whenever it is convenient for a particular argument, because my definition of 'grooming' is based on partisanship."
The definition of grooming behavior has been explained repeatedly with links. If you don’t want to be labeled a groomer, stop advocating grooming behavior.
And he does it yet again for what?... the sixth? seventh time today?
Again, he can't actually argue against what I've actually said, so he has to invent something, put words in my mouth, that he can then tackle.
It's all he's got. The only trick in his little rhetorical box.
ML: "I'm going to continue to whine about the very same tactics I use all the time on chemjeff while completely avoiding the original question, because chemjeff is actually right here."
Yet again, he can't actually argue against what I've actually said, so he again has to invent something, again put words in my mouth.
I hope your boss isn't paying you for these.
ML: "The more I keep this up, the more I hope to distract people from realizing that I never actually argued against chemjeff's argument, because I wouldn't want people to think that I actually agree with chemjeff on anything even though he's right here."
“My names Lying Jeffy and I like to make up bullshit about what people are saying, and to be extra dishonest, I put it in quotes to indicate it’s the exact words they used.”
Still making shit up. I think Jeff got stuck on repeat.
Hope his boss at the fifty-cent factory gives him a good smack.
ML; "I mean, chemjeff is exactly right when he says that I don't want schools to talk about gender identity or sexual orientation at all in school, not even if there is no sexual content at all. But as long as I can drag out this farce of a conversation, I will never have to admit so publicly."
That one didn't even make sense.
Sarc joined Team Lying Jeffy and became a bigger liar. Jeffy became broken. Not a healthy relationship.
It is the exact traits of a sea lion.
Nor can Pedo Jeffy defend the villainy of the people being discussed.
LOL @ folx>/I>
Only 5 genders? Why so exclusive? Fucking bigots. What about avian genders? What about spore producers?
Parthenogenesis is the only one they won't approve of, as the only time it happened in humans they weren't happy with the result.
You left off the two tells:
1. UPDATE: Following my exposé of the district's radical queer theory curriculum, Portland Public Schools' "K-5 health" program administrator Susannah Lightbourne-Maynard is now furiously deleting all of the documents from the internet. But it's too late: I have all the receipts. - So, either the material was inappropriate and they've abandoned it entirely or they're going to teach it to the kids without parents' knowledge/consent.
2. By the end of fifth grade, the curriculum explicitly asks students to become political activists make a “commitment to change,” according to the dictates of queer theory. Students receive a list of six commitments: - So, even if we grant Jeff more faith and credit than is due, that they're just teaching confused kids how to be less confused, that still doesn't explain the pledges/ideological purity tests. Decades of sex ed and no pledges about abstinence, avoiding abortion, affirmative consent, or disclosing STD status, stuff that might actually help them, but commitments to confusing other people about where on the LGBTQIA2S+ spectrum they stand.
P.S. - I thought I saw a '2'!
5 genders
I'm non-quinary you fucking fascists.
Good for you.
She has now pivoted to doing data science research full time, with an emphasis on sexual fetishes.
So...is there a lot of demand for that sort of data analysis? I have to wonder who is hiring for this kind of position.
We all know the positions she is hired for.
Haven’t seen a good enough pic to decide what position I’d prefer.
She's a clavinist... So... Missionary?
Clavinist??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cliff_Clavin
That typo is my new religion.
It’s a little-known fact that the tan became popular in what is known as the Bronze Age
You haven't really done statistics until you've paid a woman to perform Friedman's two-way analysis of variance on you. Just remember the safe word, "QED".
Lol
Who cares about the demand for data analysis.
Does she have any demand for research subjects?
Asking for a friend.
Yeah, that's wonderful - except that its just the same sort of emotional abuse from her whales that she says she's vulnerable to.
Camming is sex work - its not *respectable* sex work. Its pushing drugs onto junkies.
I did a survey of a bunch of escorts and found that the amount of bad things they encountered, like sexual assault, or theft, or police, or whatever, was pretty strongly correlated with their price range. Basically, the more money you charge, you're pricing yourself out of more sketchy clientele.
Not a surprise. I suspect transparency is another correlate. But data analysis probably only moves the crime around. Unless there's a solution to actually reducing/eliminating the sketchy criminals.
Legalization of sex work would help. Prostitutes are afraid to call the police where prostitution is illegal, so people can assault a prostitute and face no consequences. Actually having legal remedies, like being a position to file a lawsuit, would help.
Ditto. The number of rapes in legal Nevada brothels is... zero. And that of sexual assault is vanishingly small.
Doesn't mean it's going to zero if universally legalized, because even legal barber shops still get robbed on occasion, but legalization means better infrastructure that can deter the crime. One is no longer working in the dark underground were the police are the enemy (at least not more of an enemy than they are to ordinary folk).
Agree. Wonder though whether there is a way to reduce the number of sketchy people if their GOAL is to do something on the edge of illegal/unacceptable. Not sure this is really a thing in real life but it could be.
When CO legalized pot, there was a significant reduction in pot usage among teens. Making it legal ended the parental rebellion/shock value of it. But did they simply move their rebellion and shock value activity to something else? Is that a motivation that applies mainly to teens and young adults (maybe similar to homicide) where simply getting older reduces the proclivity to transgress?
They replaced smoking a bowl with changing thier gender.
Absolutely. That is how prohibitions work generally.
https://compactmag.com/article/they-can-t-let-him-back-in
Anti-Trump hysteria is in the final analysis not about Trump. The regime can’t allow Trump to be president not because of who he is (although that grates), but because of who his followers are. That class—Angelo Codevilla’s “country class”—must not be allowed representation by candidates who might implement their preferences, which also, and above all, must not be allowed. The rubes have no legitimate standing to affect the outcome of any political process, because of who they are, but mostly because of what they want.
Complaints about the nature of Trump are just proxies for objections to the nature of his base. It doesn’t help stabilize our already twitchy situation that those who bleat the loudest about democracy are also audibly and visibly determined to deny a real choice to half the country. “No matter how you vote, you will not get X”—whether X is a candidate or a policy—is guaranteed to increase discontent with the present regime.
hence this
Indeed
100% true. They are the enemy of the human race.
Correct.
Quite explicitly.
https://brownstone.org/articles/no-farmers-no-food-no-life/
The world is now facing a man-made food catastrophe. It is reaching crisis levels...
Current policies in many parts of the world place a priority on climate change for realizing a green new deal. Meanwhile, such policies will contribute to children dying from severe malnutrition due to broken food systems, with shortages of food and water, stress, anxiety, fear, and dangerous chemical exposure.
More negative pressure on farmers and the food system is asking for a catastrophe. The immune system of many people, especially children, has lost its resilience and has weakened too far with high risks for intoxication, infections, non-communicable and infectious diseases, deaths and infertility.
Dutch farmers, of whom many will face a cost of living crisis after 2030, have drawn the line. They are supported by an increasing number of farmers and citizens worldwide.
It’s not the farmers who are the most heavy polluters of the environment, but industries who make the products needed for a technocracy revolution to green energy, data mining, and Artificial Intelligence. As more of the WEF plans are rolled out by politicians, inequalities grow, and conflicts are rising all over the world.
The strong farmers’ revolt in the Netherlands is a call for an urgent transition to a people-oriented, free and healthy world with nutritious food cultivated and harvested in respect to natural processes. The cooperation of ordinary people worldwide is on the rise to prevent a mass famine catastrophe caused by the plan of scientism and technocracy to rule and control the world by unelected scientists and elites.
Canada is one of the world's biggest wheat exporters.
Trudeau ploughs ahead with fertilizer cut, while turning a blind eye to human suffering
Trudeau is also blocking potash production. Canada's the world's largest producer of potash, an important fertilizer component.
The coming famine is WEF planned and approved.
They are openly and transparently culling the herd of deplorables and underclass defectives. Kinda has a eugenics feel to it. The elites in Sri Lanka got a quick lesson in what happens when you fuck with peoples food supply. I don't wish for violence but I really hope the farmers in the Netherlands and the rest of Europe and maybe even Canada do the same.
Seems like the Reason might take an interest. The masses rising up against the authoritarian state. Could be a libertarian moment. But it's got a strong stench of populism and we all know how dangerous that shit is. I learned that here. At Reason. Better to stick to sex workers and food trucks.
Kill or be killed.
Yep.
Why can't they just show 5 year olds porn like an advanced society - jeff.
The goal would appear to be mass murder.
https://jonathanturley.org/2022/07/29/is-pro-life-now-hate-speech/
Below is my column in The Hill on a shift in the rhetoric in the aftermath of the overturning of Roe v. Wade. From politicians to pundits, pro-life positions are being treated as virtual hate speech.
The demonization of those with pro-life views is meant to cut off any debate on the basis or scope of abortion rights. It is the latest attack on free speech as critics seek to silence those with opposing views.
GASP! Calling controversial ideas 'hate speech' so they can be banned? WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THIS COMING?!?!?!?
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/argentinas-government-collapsing-people-refuse-work-amid-major-subsidy-cuts
"This is madness. What the piqueteros are asking for is madness,” Alvaro Gomez told The Epoch Times.
Gomez has lived and worked in Buenos Aires for more than 15 years and currently is a taxi driver. As the years have passed, he’s watched his country dive deeper into economic chaos.
“I’ve seen five presidents come and go in that time; nothing has improved. Half of our country doesn’t want a job, and the ones that do, don’t want to pay the taxes for the others,” he said.
I can’t imagine why someone wouldn’t want to pay taxes for someone they aren’t related to to sit on their ass.
Would you really want to pay a heavy tax burden for leftist scum like Jeffy to afford his 55 gallon drums of Ben & Jerry’s?
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cdc-gave-big-tech-platforms-guidance-covid-censorship
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) gave censorship 'suggestions' to social media companies and Google in order to censor users who expressed skepticism or criticism of COVID-19 vaccines, according to the Washington Free Beacon, which obtained a trove of internal communications obtained by America First Legal.
The emails, between the CDC, Google, Twitter and Meta staffers - some of whom (as Just the News notes) were former Hill and White House aides - were obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, and show extensive cooperation which included thinly veiled threats for failing to more aggressively remove content.
Private companies dude. Why do you hate liberty?
Because stalinist cancer like chemjeff the pedophile and broken bitch sarcasmic define liberty as globalist totalitarianism that molests children, steals your resources, and forces you to take experimental drugs.
Kill, or be killed.
I have some screenshots and link to the full email trove here:
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/emails-reveal-extensive-coordination
Well done.
Democrat in San Fran apparently calls black guards at city hall the n word.
“President Walton became very angry with Cadet (name redacted), who is African American, and said, ‘it is N-words like you that looks like me that is always the problem’ referring to the security protocols as some ‘N-word shit’ several times as he yelled at Cadet (name redacted),” Engler wrote in the memo, which was sent to Sheriff Paul Miyamoto and Isen.
…
Asked whether he had used “the n-word,” Walton admitted to using it multiple times and telling the cadet “this is some n— shit,” referring to the direction to take his belt off.
Democrats calling African Americans the "n" word is about as surprising as cheese on pizza.
They think that they've earned the right.
BBC is ignoring gender quotas by putting men claiming they are women into positions held over for women.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/07/30/bbc-disappearing-women-gender-quota-filled-trans-guests-who/
Ha! What are you? Some kind of biologist?
This is an obvious outcome.
MSNBC and their thoughts on black conservatives like Walker.
“Now, you ask, why are Republicans backing this man who’s so clearly unintelligent, who so clearly doesn’t have independent thoughts? But that’s actually the reason. Walker’s going to do what he’s told. And that’s what Republicans like. That’s what Republicans want from their Negroes. To do what they’re told. And Walker presents exactly as a person who lacks independent thoughts, lacks an independent agenda, lacks an independent ability to grasp policies. And he is just go in there and vote like Mitch McConnell wants him to vote.”
The iron law of the leftist: confession via projection
Cite?
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/elie-mystal-says-gop-likes-herschel-walker-because-he-does-what-hes-told-thats-what-republicans-want-from-their-negroes/
I’ve seen several other clips of this dude. Any news show that has him on is illegitimate.
He is on MSNBC all the time. Always racist.
He's just doing what he's told
In Canada 6 to 12 year olds are being taught about the benefits of euthanasia.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/canadian-childrens-activity-book-indoctrinates-kids-into-euthanasia/
In case Lying Jeffy comes along to claim otherwise, here's the book:
https://www.virtualhospice.ca/maid/media/3bdlkrve/maid-activity-book.pdf
They call death a cute acronym, "MAID", so they don't have to mention constantly what it's actually all about.
I wonder if even Germany in the 1920s and ’30s sank so low as to educate its youth about the goodness of euthanasia of the sick and disabled?
They had a catchy slogan, but I don't know about reaching out to kid's.
I'm pretty sure they did during the height of eugenics. It was probably taught here when that was a craze. A lot of stuff now is the elite falling for eugenics with a smile these days.
It’s a death cult.
Huh. Teaching kids envirotransgenderqueer theory in class takes yet another step closer to teaching them actual, no shit, throw-them-in-a-volcano, religious virgin sacrifice after all. Who could've foreseen it?
How else are we going to both reduce human carbon production while SIMULTANEOUSLY returning carbon to the earth from humans?!
Human sacrifice to volcanoes is a big double win for the eco-terrorists
Well we have a battle of the billionaires going on here. Gates says the planet is over populated. Musk says we're under populated. What to do? WEF, Davos and our leftist rulers like Gates so they go right back to first principles; eugenics. O(f course they won't call it that.
Like everything else, they've perverted the original intent of eugenics too.
It's no longer to purge the population of weakness or defective traits. The purpose now is to cull the genetically strong, the talented, and the independent minded. Sure, they'll off as many traditional minorities as they can along the way. But what is now considered defective is inherent superiority to our decadent, mediocre ruling class - the overly conscious minds and programmable bots who can't survive, let alone thrive, in anything but an environment dictated by ridiculous and arbitrary laws that reward satisfying it while punishing natural instinct.
Fuck you. That is not even close to what this book is about. This is a therapy book. It is a book to help kids deal with the pain and emotions of someone in their life who is suffering and going through euthanasia.
God you really are an asshole. You cannot even begin to empathize even a little bit with a kid who might have to go through this situation, can you? A kid might be losing his/her mom or dad due to incurable cancer, and all you can do is bash a therapy book that tries to help him/her deal with it. Let's not even begin to consider why a book like this might be necessary in the first place. Let's scream INDOCTRINATION! instead and take away one small thing that might help this kid deal with his/her feelings of grief.
I even linked a full copy because I knew that you'd pull this, you lying piece of shit. Euthanasia is exactly what this book is about.
Everyone here can read it for themselves. You're not tricking anyone.
Of course it's about euthanasia. It's not PROMOTING euthanasia. It is a therapy book to help kids deal with someone in their life who might be going through it.
"It's not PROMOTING euthanasia."
"MAiD means that medicine is used to help someone with their death. A doctor or nurse practitioner (a nurse with special
training) uses medicines to stop the person’s body from working. When their body stops working, the person dies.
This is done in a way that does not hurt the person. The medicines help them feel comfortable and peaceful."
That's right. It is explaining what euthanasia is in terms appropriate for a kid.
You are a complete asshole for taking a therapy book intended for kids who are losing a family member to a horrible disease and using it for your culture war bullshit.
That's a hagiography of the process and you know it you fucking liar. And your lame-ass sophistry and appeals to emotion aside, "MAID" is killing people. Not the disease. Here in Canada they can off you for depression.
"A person can only have MAiD if they are
at least 18 years old, and if: They have a serious illness, disease, or disability that hurts their body or their mind so much that it feels too hard to keep living."
I posted the book. Everyone can read it. You're not tricking anyone, ghoul.
Oh right, I thought maybe you might be a civilized human being for once and not be in favor of using state force to purposefully prolong people's suffering. My bad.
You’re shifting the goalposts again. As usual. Since your claim th the book does not promote euthanasia is now debunked.
Why don’t you just GTFO of here and never come back?
He couldn't argue against what I actually said, so he has to shift the subject and make an appeal to emotion.
No no, I get it.
If you're opposed to euthanasia, as National Review and ML are, then even neutrally explaining what euthanasia is, is the same as "promoting" it, since a neutral explanation does not denounce euthanasia as wrong.
Anything less than telling kids "euthanasia is wrong" is "promoting" euthanasia to kids. Got it.
No Jeffy, it’s just that you can’t debate any point without being a lying, sophist shitweasel. I was merely calling you out on that here.
It's not a "hagiography". It's not whitewashing what euthanasia is. The book describes it neutrally in simplistic terms suitable for kids. But that's the problem - the book is neutral towards euthanasia. It doesn't denounce euthanasia. Therefore it is "whitewashing" it. Right?
It’s another form of grooming for really young children. You just can’t help yourself.
Weird that a Government can kill people who want to die without technically hurting them but can't seem to kill people who need to die without technically hurting them.
It’s the democrat way.
Leftist (abuse) program for children:
-teach race essentialism and moral guilt/virtue based on skin color, as well as conditioning children to think of "race" as a disability and their primary identity from the earliest possible moments
-shut down schools, prohibit them from seeing friends or going to the park, force them to hide half their faces (fundamentally stunting development by restricting nonverbal communication), and impose neuroses suggesting they see all other humans as a threat at all ti.es simply for existing
-turn them into a sexual object by teaching sexuality and gender identity to ages as young as 5
https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1553750432597565440?t=fHKdxyc1phD-mewWnTIpKA&s=19
I repeat: Very rightly we talk about the physical harms done to children through puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery in service to Queer Marxist delusions about transformation, but we neglect to talk enough about the mental and emotional damage done as part of the same.
It's fair to say that Queer Marxism exists to damage mental and emotional health. It is to estrange people from their families, their faiths, their cultural histories, and themselves in a vain pursuit of something new and unattainable. Its goal is the destruction of stability.
Queer Marxism undermines the stability of a society by undermining psychological, social, mental, emotional, and conceptual stability, primarily by leveraging sex and identity. These are the fulcra across which they seek to move the world, the Archimedean point sought by Marcuse.
[Links]
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1553752489157165059?t=HabACo4Gbh2tLES4dX-CEg&s=19
I know it shouldn't -- again: I know it shouldn't -- but sometimes it does surprise me how brazen, undisguised and virtually explicit NBC News reporters are about serving as WH messengers.
This is indistinguishable from a DNC press release, and just as one-sided and tendentious:
For a huge number of employees of media corporations -- especially the liberal ones such as NBC/MSNBC and CNN -- the highest prize in journalism is no longer the Pulitzer. It's a re-tweet (head pat) from Biden @WHCOS Ron Klain. Congrats to @sahilkapur for the well-deserved honor.
The obvious context for all of this is that we're 3 months from the mid-term elections, with polls showing that Biden is one of the most unpopular presidents in decades.
They're really giving it their all to convince Americans that they're wrong to dislike Biden and blame Dems.
[Links]
https://twitter.com/DrJBhattacharya/status/1553754606877872129?t=t5GlYbTm7jnNddmKaNbzHQ&s=19
This is 100% true. It's clear that there is no mainstream institutional group in the US -- not teachers' unions, not pediatrics, not human rights groups -- that stood for kids during the pandemic. The few politicians who did (e.g. Gov. DeSantis) were mercilessly attacked for it.
[Link]
https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1553758051882209281?t=FlNmkj3n8mVdtskVo5pzVw&s=19
Mainstream conservatism is to the left of Barack Obama in 2010
Managed defeat, driving the speed limit, whatever you want to call it this is the function of the GOP
Opposition to progressivism is impossible, in fact the adoption of progressive positions from 12 years ago is “too extreme”
We must escape this narrative trap
[Link]
https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1553761455165644801?t=wfw7h0aoMpANeGpDw8HDgg&s=19
“Someone has been caused anxiety based on your social media post. And that is why you’re being arrested.”
@HantsPolice arrested an army veteran in Hampshire, England on Thursday over his posting of a meme of trans pride flags arranged into a swastika.
[Video]
Just the other day Tony was insisting that criticizing the alphabet sex cult wouldn't get you arrested.
Anxiety crimes.
Ot: Someone posted a tweet link with a video of a bunch of lefty economists saying that 2 quarters of GDP decline is a recession and I don’t remember where it was posted. Anyone have the link handy or remember where it was posted?
"Ot:"
Off topic? Get back to a discussion of the original post, like all the other commenters!
What was the article about?
GFY
Go Fuck Yourself
I know what it stands for, but are you aware that I was perhaps indulging in a little bit of sarcasm?
This one?
https://twitter.com/YALiberty/status/1552028762866388994
Yep, thanks. Want to share with the wife.
"I'm surprised more sex workers aren't also data scientists."
Seriously?
So she's stroking the egos (among other things) of rich men?
So these rich men have wives and families? Did the wives sign official consent forms to make it all nice and libertarian?
This is actually in tune with the items which nardz posts. So what if the rich elites metaphorically screw the poor and middle classes, they can make up for it by renting out the daughters of the poor for the literal kind of screwing.
This is the third advertisement this year on "Aella the libertarian sex worker".
See also:
Libertarian Sex Worker Turned Data Scientist
Meet Aella: The Libertarian Rationalist Sex Worker
Can't get an article on the global farmer protests though.
This is a bit beyond libertarianism.
Suppose that instead of saying that free speech for racists (real ones, not made-up "racists") is part of the price we pay for freedom, that it would be worse to drive them underground, etc., the editors went the next step and repeatedly published sympathetic interviews with some Grand Kleagle about his awesome strategy to avoid the censors and get the word out about his principles...
They’re more libertine than libertarian here, Flower Commander.
Don’t say bad things about Reason. Sarc gets anxiety.
Hey man. He was hacked.
Did he pull that shit again?
Not yet. Guessing tomorrow.
Hacked by his alter ego, Drunky McBlackout.
I thought it was Drunky McDrunkface.
Has his own t-shirt.
https://www.thesocietees.com/product/drunk-society-drunky-mcdrunkface-mens-t-shirt/
What's more important food or paying someone for sex?
Who says the two are unrelated?
If the ruling orders are limiting your opportunities to feed yourself with honest work...
She needs to get a food truck. She'd have daily coverage.
That's not true, we've been treated to several, or have you forgotten the numerous articles on the dark forces of populism taking root around the globe?
All with Liz Wolfe in the byline. I think Liz has a crush. Or she's deep in debt on her OnlyFans account and is providing Aella free advertising in trade.
Well, here's a scary article meant to scare you about right-wingers demanding a constitutional convention.
https://www.businessinsider.com/constitutional-convention-conservatives-republicans-constitution-supreme-court-2022-7
But honestly I think a constitutional convention would be a healthy thing. The Constitution is not the Inerrant Word of God, it is a document written by human beings. It is a brilliant document, it is a very foresighted document, but it is not a perfect document, even as amended, and IMO we should always be open to changing or reforming the way we do things.
A few things that I might put in a revised Constitution:
- An absolute mandate that each representative must represent no more than X number of residents, where X is some number on the order of 100,000 or so. The size of the House is just too small for the size of the population that we now have.
- Really clarifying the Fourth Amendment to specify in more detail what a "reasonable" search is.
- Abolishing the death penalty.
- Clarifying the commerce clause - that it refers to genuine trade between the states, not merely to trade that *might* influence interstate trade.
Just a few off the top of my head.
Is this non tribalist jeff being tribalist again?
That's "Chief" Non-Tribalist Jeff to you.
I actually made a post supportive of your team, moron.
"- An absolute mandate that each representative must represent no more than X number of residents, where X is some number on the order of 100,000 or so. The size of the House is just too small for the size of the population that we now have."
Well look at that, your first point is one that would massively increase the power democrats have in congress due to them controlling high population cities.
When is it going to get through to you fuckers that the founders put in place a system that DISCOURAGED mob rule?
It would make the body DESIGNED to be representative of the people, to be actually more so.
Believe me, I don't want the mob running everything. But in the place where the mob's opinion should count, the House, it should reflect the ACTUAL opinions of the various factions of the mob, not just those of a select few who were successfully gerrymandered into place.
Once again, Jeffy argues for more demagogues getting into congress by expanding it.
No, we should go the complete opposite direction: Abolish the House entirely.
And be ruled by what? A benevolent dictator?
A unitary legislative body, every state getting exactly one vote.
So you want a 50-person oligarchy?
I want a true return to federalism, and that means solving problems at the state level. If that means declaring representative democracy a complete failure, I'm ok with that.
How should these fifty people be chosen by the states?
Ideally by the legislatures. In that way, the legislature now becomes the main body of governance.
So the people have no direct say over the federal government?
Nope. What part of "declaring representative democracy a complete failure" did you miss?
Hmm. Seems like you will get more elitist corrupt government if we do things your way. All power in the hands of only 50 people?
What part of federalism did you not get?
I'd axe most of article I section 8.
https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1553751930673012737?t=NQSAR1inNwDfvJcfSngi_w&s=19
In the name of a virus, government gave you:
$3,200 of checks
$30,000 of debt
A wrecked economy
Isolation from family
Closed businesses
Shortages
High prices
A vaccine that doesn’t immunize you
Medical tyranny
Dwindling savings due to inflation
And claimed this saved you.
I will shut down the virus!
Joe Biden
He didn't tell you he thinks of freedom and capitalism as viruses.
At one point, she was one of the most successful and best-known creators on the adult subscription site OnlyFans, earning more than $100,000 per month. She has now pivoted to doing data science research full time, with an emphasis on sexual fetishes.
So... ok. There's a couple of very obvious questions here that I didn't see answered... or even explored.
I'm guessing one question is who is paying for her data science?
Why did she take a cut in pay?
Nobody stays at the top of OnlyFans for an appreciable amount of time.
I could be persuaded to have her on top for an appreciable amount of time, if you know what I’m saying.
lots of pro's take in a lot of data and keep a log of it.
who likes rough sex, who likes anal, who likes choking, who likes rimjobs.
all kinds of important data. they are all data scientists
As are Jeffy and Buttplug. Keeping track of particulars of the anal and oral cavities of assorted pre teens.
This is also selling the guys an identity for who they want to be. If you're like, "Hey, I'm a sex worker. And also, I do data," they're like, "Wow, I'm such a high-end guy that I am attracted to this hot woman who also does data. Look how deep I am."
By the way, this is still my favorite part of her whole schtick.
She must have found a great audience of really, really dumb guys who had a lot of money to part with.
"I'm all like, and they're all like, and then we were all like, omg fr fr... ngl."
Str8 bussin no cap
On god.
Seems like a grift to me. But beaver fever is the most powerful force in the universe. And the carbon emissions involved are mostly just heavy breathing. Win/win for everybody involved as far as I can see.
Who is ready for the movie Debbie does data?
Star trek porn exists.
So does Doctor Who porn. That was part of my childhood I would liked to have held on to.
Wasn't "Debbie Does Data" a Star Trek parody porn back in the day?
George Jetson is being born today.
https://www.cbr.com/jetsons-george-birthday-future/
We don't even have a reliable self-driving car yet.
I was promised a flying car. I got google. I will never forget.
https://twitter.com/ninaturner/status/1553491047099125762?t=tkQkh4ahNlrs_5o6Y2PdbA&s=19
Should @POTUS cancel student debt?
[Poll]
Can he Cancle my house payments?
Seriously though how is this not a money for votes?
It's exactly a money for votes.
I'm sure Hillary can cankle your house payments for you.
Not to worry. The Chinese will buy our debt for ever and ever and ever.
I racked up a big food bill this week, which is an unfair burden IMO. Maybe Biden can send me a check?
How could life be fair if I have to pay for shit I knowingly asked for and agreed to pay for?
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1553828161900621824?t=grVjU-8CxBmrTuorjCzTWw&s=19
According to the drag queen’s tiktok, this occurred at a Catholic High School in NYC. They brought a drag queen to speak to students about drag and LGBTQ
[Video]
Not Catholic. Episcopalian. Drag queen got it wrong
Episcopalian
So atheists.
Every last one of them is masked *except* the drag queen. What an utterly fucked religion.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1553181248922587136?t=f_GuL_Sue5ZeqeaQ0RIskA&s=19
Minnesota elementary principal promoted the book “Jack Not Jackie” as summer reading for K-2 grades.
The book is about a toddler becoming transgender and cross-dressing.
[Link]
Impossible. Jeff's been swearing that it's only about teaching high school kids.
Has he?
I'm pretty sure he's been insisting on the desire/need to instruct 5 year olds about sex
ML: "Down here in this thread, I will lie about chemjeff's argument, when up above I was whining and whining that chemjeff was lying about my argument, and playing the pretend role of a victim."
See. He can't argue against what I say. He's got to invent a statement, attribute it to me and argue against that.
ML: "Why is chemjeff using Jesse's tactics against me? Doesn't he know that only Jesse gets to stuff words into people's mouths? I'm supposed to be Jesse's cheerleader and attack poodle, not be the victim of his tactics!"
Jesus. I mean, I know most of these people are hypocrites and are very happy to go from "its not happening!" to "of course its happening and we need to do it for social justice" but this turn around is getting embarrassingly fast. Like they started getting called out as groomers in the last couple months and there is already such a mountain of evidence they are doing it they will have no choice but jump to the "but we NEED this in the curriculum"
What's the grooming part here?
There's no graphic sex talk, there's no hiding anything from anyone, she's making a video to the world recommending this book to kids.
Oh wait. She is recommending a book that isn't about traditional gender norms. Therefore it's equivalent to child sexual abuse. Right?
Therefore it's equivalent to child sexual abuse. Right?
Yup. Should she be recommending a book about controversial theories about the shapes of the various races' skulls? A book about the innate genetic superiority of the blond-haired, blue-eyed, and light-skinned? Yes, teaching harmful lies to children through the school system is abuse. If the lies are related to sex it's definitively sexual abuse. You keep making this argument like people are going to think "Oh, he said sexual, abuse; not sexual abuse, so that's OK." when the vast majority are going to ask the begged question "What's the difference?" At which point, you'll lay out how this really is a dumber gender-based rendition of phrenology and master race ideology. I mean, the Nazis never explicitly depicted that the blond-haired blue-eyed kids should never have sex with each other, right? So, no harm, no foul.
*sigh* edit:
the blond-haired blue-eyed kids should
neveronly have sex with each otherYup.
Umm, I think you're starting to get into "words are violence" territory. Even if one were to believe that transgenderism was a "harmful lie", teaching it is not equivalent to an act of physical abuse, sexual or otherwise.
Yes, teaching harmful lies to children through the school system is abuse. If the lies are related to sex it's definitively sexual abuse.
Okay, this is dumb. It is like calling a gun a "chemical weapon", because (a) it's a weapon and (b) it's made of chemicals. That is distorting the meaning of the term "chemical weapon" in an absurdly literal way. What distinguishes "sexual abuse" from other types of abuse is not that it is any abuse that has some tenuous connection to the word "sex", but that it is an act of physical sexual behavior that is perpetrated against another person, generally using force, without their consent or permission.
So even if one were to assume that transgenderism was a "harmful lie", a teacher teaching it would not be guilty of "sexual abuse" as the term is properly understood, the teacher would be guilty of an abuse of power, or an abuse of authority. It would be the exact same abuse of power/authority if the teacher were to teach any other "harmful lie" such as phrenology.
But, transgenderism is not a "harmful lie". It is simply another way of being. Transgenderism is simply choosing to act in a way that does not conform to the social conventions assumed by one's biological sex. This choice may be a wise one or not, it may be the result of a mental illness or not, but it is not harmful to point it out, nor to point out that one's biological sex does not necessarily dictate how one must act in public.
Literally cancer.
And I assume chemjeff Stalinist pedophile would object to schools teaching that praying to God to cure one's virus is just as legitimate and effective a treatment as going to the doctor to get proper medication...
Get help.
Get dead.
You’re the sick fuck who wants to groom our kids and stood up for that illegal who raped the little girl in Ohio coming to America.
Defend that.
Umm, I think you're starting to get into "words are violence" territory. Even if one were to believe that transgenderism was a "harmful lie", teaching it is not equivalent to an act of physical abuse, sexual or otherwise.
So I was correct and it's a distinction of degree, not a categorical distinction. I don't much care if others define the behavior as sexual abuse, sexual harassment, or sexual assault. Malicious or not, it's a sexually-oriented abuse of authority. If a SCOTUS nominee can't skate on an unsubstantiated, platonic joke about a pubic hair on his coke can, or on the flights of fancy about a 35-yr.-old sexual assault allegations, or a President on the fact that he had sexual relations with a staffer, teachers should be scrutinized equally. Moreover, since they aren't currently charged with educating K-5 students about sex, the reasonable solution would be to avoid the topic as best as possible. But pro-trans activists such as yourself can't accept reasonable, inexpensive, and non-invasive solutions.
WTF
https://twitter.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1553854052412182529?t=Fjh3F89pYTWvPMzImOxzOw&s=19
Look who just happened to be in Kosovo this week
[Pic]
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/rumors-serbia-kosovo-clashes-send-border-tensions-soaring-president-addresses-nationn
One way ratchet, no reverse gear.
Yeah Clinton's war. The propaganda back then rivaled Biden's war in Ukraine. The bad guys guys we were told had organized rape rooms and were terrorizing the wimins. Turns out it was all horseshit but ultimately it didn't matter. The world was once again safe for DEMOCRACY. Or maybe not. But nobody shut off the natgas to Germany so it can all be forgotten. At this point the Biden/Reason neocons will figure this out and we'll know what to think. Maybe Reason will publish another by article David French to gives us the Libertarian case. Actually we might need Bill Kristol or libertarian hero Liz Cheney.
"The propaganda back then rivaled Biden's war in Ukraine."
If you limit the comparison to media available at the time, maybe.
But the only things comparable to the sheer mass of propaganda pushed out for Ukraine has been covid. Maybe police brutality/racism, though that's in less concentrated form.
BREAKING : Pelosi seen flying over Taiwan
https://twitter.com/Levi_godman/status/1553431825317593089
Small radar cross section, but I think the chicoms could still hit her
If I said that I didn't care if she tragically met her death in the South China sea would I have to go to confession before taking communion? I'm not actually Catholic. Just wondering how this works.
Not sure but doesn't it count as an indulgence?
OK I had to ask my wife, a former Catholic who has tragically fallen from grace. She was not much help so I went to catholic.com. Turns out indulgences are, or were, available for purchase from the local priest if you checked off the right boxes. Not sure I'm in a position to buy redemption. Don't get me wrong. I have benefitted greatly from the Biden Boom but I'm not liquid.
No, I meant not caring counts as an indulgence paid.
Is Pelosi a sister of Endora’s?
Oh look, the hits just keep on coming.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/3581932-hogan-slams-disgusting-lies-about-9-11-by-maryland-gop-attorney-general-nominee/
For a second I thought you were talking about the guys who said January 6 was worse than 9/11. Silly me.
Say, weren't most of the prominent 9/11 truthers Democrat? Like Cynthia McKinney, Mike Gravel, Woody Harrelson, Mark Ruffalo and Rosie O'Donnell?
In fact, by 2011, didn't more than half of all Democrats say they believed Bush was complicit in the 9/11 terror attacks?
How fascinating to find a Republican one. Good job, Jeffy.
Well, you-know-who has stepped in it again.
"We need to be the party of nationalism and I'm a Christian, and I say it proudly, we should be Christian nationalists"
https://news.yahoo.com/over-12-000-christians-condemned-164448708.html
So what's wrong with Christian nationalists? Beats the hell out of the corporatist socialism that your dear AOC, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib are peddling.
https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2021/february-web-only/what-is-christian-nationalism.html
"Christian nationalism is the belief that the American nation is defined by Christianity, and that the government should take active steps to keep it that way."
So? Historically they're not entirely wrong. Anyway, American atheists believe America should be defined by secularism and aren't keen on the second half of the establishment clause, and I don't have a problem with that either.
Let them want that. If either group can peacefully convince the rest of the citizens, all the power to them.
That definition of Christian Nationalism would seem to, almost explicitly or by design, scoop up a lot of non-Christians. It pretty straightforwardly states that if you believe the 1A, believe it was invented by or the product of Christian culture, and that without the 1A and the Separation of Church and State, we'd lose our freedom and cultural heritage, you're a Christian Nationalist, whether you believe in Christ or not.
"Christian nationalism tends to treat other Americans as second-class citizens."
That seems like a utterly bullshit statement. Right now the only group treating other Americans as second-class citizens are the establishment Woke.
Their a far bigger problem than anything listed in that demagogic hit piece.
Yes, the "demagogic hit piece" from the radical atheists at Christianity Today.
Christian nationalists do not reject the First Amendment and do not advocate for theocracy
...
Christian nationalism tends to treat other Americans as second-class citizens. If it were fully implemented, it would not respect the full religious liberty of all Americans.
He didn't say it was radical atheists and he didn't say which demagoguery motivated it. He did say it seems like bullshit and given the contradiction of supporting the 1A and, apparently, fully implementing a theocracy, he would seem to be correct.
Why are you even quoting Christianity Today? Wouldn't we run afoul of the 1A implementing their preferred religious policies too? Aren't you just cherry-picking from a legally and logically backwards morass of righteousness-seekers and declaring some of them to be more equal than their second-class bretheren? Based on what, their morals?
And just as I figured, because I am critical of Christian Nationalism, here you are to jump in and defend it.
Here we see chemjeff Stalinist pedophile appropriate nazi propaganda techniques, just as he/him did with covid, to again lie about the people his masters tell him to hate.
Die soon, faggot.
So it's "nazi propaganda techniques" to quote MTG directly?
Hey look- the aspiring child molester pretends it was a single sentence quote instead of all the other marxist bullshit he wrote thats being discussed.
Lying pedophile deserves the woodchipper.
Seems the Chinese are trying to make amends for unleashing covid on the world...
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/china-pelosi-you-will-perish-over-taiwan
Apology accepted, China, if you can make it work.
The brave radicals at...USA Today come out in favor of marijuana legalization.
https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/opinion/todaysdebate/2022/07/31/legalize-marijuana-federal-prohibition-more-harm-than-good/10100661002/
Oh FFS, Germany. Just keep the nuke plants on.
https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/germany-argues-nuclear-shutdown-amid-gas-supply-worries-87699966
I mean, shoot, they're already doing this:
The government has already given the green light for utility companies to fire up 10 dormant coal-fired power plants and six that are oil-fueled, and plans also to clear the way for dormant lignite-fired plants to be reactivated. Another 11 coal-fired power plants scheduled to be shut down in November will be allowed to keep operating.
The nuke plants are greener. Do those.
What is it with progressive women and their fetishization of sex work as something noble and good for society, or women even? We get it, the girl is a whore and you find that awesome but other than accelerating the destruction of Western society, what is the point of promoting the commodification and anonamization of relationships?
To the leftist/progressive, fantasy>reality.
They are literally psychotic.
They have a deep desire to be dominated and used (not uncommon in women), treated as a desirable object, and their fantasies of Johns are informed by fairy tales like Pretty Woman or 50 Shades. They fetishize sex work because in their mind it isn't really work, but they'd be doing what they want to do anyway and just getting paid for it.
Being a paid sex worker is better than being a conscript for Putin.
Hey, I'm a libertarian. Legalize it, get it out of the shadows, end the worst underworld abuses and deny its income fr organized crime. But I can't abide this "sex worker" bull and other such rebranding to morally legitimize it. It's call "prostitution", "stripping", "pornography", etc, and it ought to be rightly ostracized by polite society.
Hey, sex work is more legitimate than politics or religion or crypto currency. At least what Aella and other sex workers offer is real.
Do you shave your pubes on cam, or before you start the webcam show? Do you make extra for "unique" insertions?