In Iowa, You No Longer Need a Permit To Sell Guns Across the Road from the Governor's Mansion
A new state law prohibits localities from prohibiting or licensing "no-impact" home-based businesses. That's allowing a Des Moines couple to sell guns from their house located just across the street from the governor's mansion.

A new law signed by Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds limiting local governments' power to regulate home businesses is letting her neighbors open a home-based gun dealership without the need for a city permit.
This past Wednesday, the Des Moines Register reports, the Des Moines Zoning Board of Adjustment was supposed to hold a public hearing to vet an application from homeowners Travis and Elizabeth Aslin to set up a home-based business that would sell firearms online and allow for on-site pickups.
The Aslins' plan for their home-based business—which would be located just across the street from the Iowa governor's mansion—set off a storm of controversy from the neighbors, who argued it could lead to an increase in crime and reduction in property values.
"There is a potential for weapons that can be purchased and fired from this property to have a range of nearly 2000 [feet]—this affect hundreds of houses, businesses, daycares, domestic violence shelters, a school, and the governor's mansion," reads the petition, which was signed some 170 people.
This kind of organized public opposition is often enough to sink conditional use applications. But not in this case.
The day before the Zoning Board of Adjustment was supposed to hold its public hearing on the Aslins permit, the board abruptly took it off the agenda.
Erik Lundy, a city zoning enforcement officer, issued a letter explaining that the Aslins' proposed firearm selling business qualified as a "no-impact home-based business" under the new home-based business bill signed into law by Reynolds in June.
Travis Aslin also told Axios that his business was more of a hobby and that he's sold only two guns in the last five years from his previous home.
The new law prohibits local governments from banning no-impact businesses, provided they don't generate off-street parking and the business activity takes place inside the house and can't be viewed by the neighbors. The law also prevents local governments from requiring no-impact home businesses to obtain permits, licenses, or other permissions.
Lundy said the state law prevented the city from requiring the Aslins to get a permit. His letter notes that Travis Aslin's firearm business is already regulated by the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which can conduct yearly unannounced inspections.
Lundy's letter means the couple can now go ahead with their business. Some of the neighborhood opponents told the Des Moines Register they were planning on appealing the zoning board's decision and will take it all the way to the local district court if necessary.
The typical conditional use permit controversy normally goes the other way: The property owner is forced to file endless appeals trying to convince the neighbors and city officials that they should be allowed to do what they want with their property.
Iowa's new protections for home-based businesses have turned that dynamic on its head. It's now local NIMBYs that have to spin their wheels and spend their money, arguing a new home-based business will be a detriment to the neighborhood that should be stopped.
Fortunately, Iowa's new home-based business law forces local authorities to focus on the actual impacts of businesses on their neighbors. That pushes local government regulation toward its proper role of combating legitimate nuisances, while otherwise leaving people free to use their property as they see fit.
And if that means a gun dealer can set up shop next to the governor's house, all the better.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A range of nearly 2000 feet! OMFG that's worse than a war weapon!
I made $30,030 in just 5 weeks working part-time right from my apartment. ggh. When I lost my last business I got tired right away and luckily I found this job online and with that I am able to start reaping lots right through my house. Anyone can achieve this top level career and make more money online by:-
Reading this article:>>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
>Travis Aslin also told Axios that his business was more of a hobby and that he's sold only two guns in the last five years from his previous home.
In that case, he doesn’t actually qualify for an FFL.
Depends on which administration is in office. The Biden administration would say the couple are arms traffickers and responsible for the uptick in violence in "nearby" Chicago!
FFL's were pretty common, and many were homebased businesses not all that long ago.
The Aslin's do require an FFL to receive gun shipments for distribution to buyers...
Statutorily he does. The BATF rule saying you needed a separate place of business was just an administrative invention. It had no basis in the actual text of the law.
The ATF doesn't typically let you keep your license if you are doing such a low volume of sales, they interpret that to mean you aren't actually "engaging in the business of buying and selling guns" and it is, as Travis Aslin says himself, just a hobby.
Again, an administrative interpretation, not forced by the statutory language.
This was a policy change pushed through during the Clinton administration in order to put most gun dealers out of business, allowing the BATF to seize their log books.
" ... and fired from this property ..."
Good grief! They aren't operating a gun range - so I'm pretty sure that's already illegal...
yeah, i had the same thought when i read that. these people apparently think it is a virtual war zone for a one mile radius around every gun store that exists.....
Or anyone who owns a gun.
Shhh! Nobody tell them that 2000' is nowhere near a mile.
Don’t you load up your newly purchased guns outside the gun shop and do a few mag dumps into the air to celebrate? ????
Having been born in Iowa and currently a resident of Iowa again, I am quite glad that my neighbors may or may not have guns. The criminals don't know for sure. I suspect our governor thinks the same way.
~15 years ago, I was tasked with taking my nephews and my son to the older Nephews' birthday party at a local restaurant. I ended up with them 30 minutes early, before the festivities started, so to kill time, I asked my nephew if we could just go to the local gun store. This was in Iowa. Sure. So we went and the boys oogled the guns, made wish lists, and had a better time than the birthday party.