My Baby Needed Special Formula From Europe. U.S. Trade Policy Made It Almost Unobtainable.
The FDA should not stand in the way of parents doing what’s best for their children.

My son was born with severe heartburn and cried constantly—and the baby formula on the shelves only caused him more pain. At the suggestion of our pediatrician, we turned to a European goat milk formula that we hoped could soothe my son's stomach until he grew out of his condition. But recently our orders were canceled, thanks to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
America's baby formulas are incredibly standardized. The FDA claims that that's safer, but those regulations mean that most formulas have multiple ingredients that could be allergens or irritants. Milk-based formulas in the U.S. also have soy ingredients like soy oil, as well as palm oil. And most American formulas have higher than average levels of iron, which can cause constipation. While many European brands are similar to American ones, you can find brands there that don't contain so many possible irritants to a child's sensitive stomach. We used Nannycare, and my son found it much more tolerable than its stateside competitors.
It's impossible to say for sure why my English supplier suddenly decided not to sell formulas to a buyer in the U.S. But the timing of the cancellation provides a clue: It happened shortly after the FDA blocked a large amount of European formula from being sold, declaring that they did not meet the agency's standards.
We are far from the only family that relies on European baby formula. Yet the free flow of perfectly safe goods into the United States is still extremely restricted. The agency's strict rules about how formulas can be made limit options for children with medical issues and leaves parents with products that can cause their little ones pain.
Worse yet, these regulations are more driven by bureaucratic and political interests than by science. These products, after all, have not caused a wave of problems for European babies.
Luckily, by the time our shipments were cut off my son had nearly outgrown his problem. So we transitioned him to an American formula.
The compulsory standardization of the American formula market also makes it difficult for pediatricians to determine whether a child is allergic to a formula component or has a more serious digestive issue. If parents had more choice over the formula their children consumed, a physician could recommend different products for a child they believe is suffering from an allergic reaction or a more serious issue. But the market is so uniform that it's nearly impossible to determine what component could be bothering the infant. Often, infants don't get treated until much later, because it's too difficult for doctors to determine what's causing the discomfort.
It would have been nice to start my son's acid-reducing medications sooner. Instead, I got two months of an incredibly uncomfortable and cranky newborn.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The FDA knows much more about what is best for your child than you do.
After baby formula, they will hand off caring for your child to the Department of Education, who will see he is educated in all the proper attitudes and thoughts.
After college, the Department of Commerce, with an able assist from OSHA, will assure you "child" faces no need to think, and will make it impossible for him to do anything dangerous, or even risky.
So shut up, sit down, and pay your taxes.
>>The FDA claims that that's safer
and never double-that in writing.
I without a doubt have made $18k inside a calendar month thru operating clean jobs from a laptop. As I had misplaced my ultimate business, I changed into so disenchanted and thank God I searched this easy task (bdu-08) accomplishing this I'm equipped to reap thousand of bucks simply from my home. All of you could really be part of this pleasant task and will gather extra cash on-line
travelling this site.
>>>>>>>>>> https://smartpays11.pages.dev/
The fact that the mother was deprived of a European-made formula that was safer for her newborn baby than American-made formulas is dreadful, for both her and her baby. Here's hope she can get something to soothe her baby's painful colic.
I'm very sorry to hear about your baby. I agree, we should abolish the FDA's ability to enforce restrictions and turn them into something closer to an advocacy agency without enforcement powers. Or just get rid of them entirely, but if we just transferred their budget over to Consumer Reports I think the country would basically be better overall.
First world problems.
Oh, fuck off. Nobody cares about your baby. The FDA and trade regulations are onerous and ineffective but your "
OurMy baby has a fever!" bullshit is bullshit.Broodling No. 1 suffered meconium aspiration syndrome at birth and spent a week in the NICU. Suffered asthma and allergies until he was about 10. Now he's 15 and the only medication he takes is for his acne by his own choice.
Broodling No. 2 was a porker at 9.5 lbs. and despite suffering GERD constantly, even after moving on to solid foods, never dropped below 9.5 lbs. Now he's 13 and, because he hits the gym and prefers playing sports, by his own choice, is faster and stronger than his bigger, older brother.
"If it could save even one newborn." is a pretty absurd policy argument. "If it could save *my* newborn (and me) from a couple months of GERD." is just retarded. You heaping your own neuroses on your children is worse than a case of the tummy rumbles.
Not only is your comment cruel beyond the bounds of decency, but you are arguing for a pointless reduction of freedom that also hurts babies. I don't remember that kind of attitude from you before. Hit a sore spot? (I am sorry about what you and your boys went through. A newborn with health problems is nerve-wracking and emotionally pummeling.)
Hit a sore spot?
If you'd read enough of my posts you'd know that, yeah, I'm not a fan of hucksterism, alarmism, hypochondria, and Munchausen by proxy parading around as legitimate medical science *or* intelligent decision making.
I am sorry about what you and your boys went through. A newborn with health problems is nerve-wracking and emotionally pummeling.
First, I'm not here advocating for the FDA or trade regulations. If you want baby formula from Europe, fine. But don't pretend your specious reasoning is any more or less grounded (morally or otherwise) than someone who wants French goat milk formula simply because they're a Francophile.
Second, I'm not the least bit sorry for what my kids went through. They aren't the least bit bothered by it either. So, why the fuck are you sorry? Her baby isn't dying. It's crying because it's stomach is upset. Not caring if someone else's baby's stomach is upset isn't cruel, it's normal. Conspiring with others to foist guilt and extort sympathy from others for children is cruel to others and the children.
Third, yeah, it hit a sore spot. I work with several youth organizations, namely Scouts, where parents have, internal to the family, heaped these neuroses off on their kids and effectively trained them to foist them on other people. They'll then drop them off on unsuspecting parents and get incredulous when everyone doesn't or can't constantly conform to their (parents') demands. Between all my sons I know close to two dozen kids, many teenagers, who outweigh any of my boys in clearly unhealthy ways that are "allergic" to gluten and dairy and need water pH 7+ to avoid heartburn but are completely OK cramming Culvers (Home of the Butterburger!) into their faces. And that's just scratching the surface. Kids who need nightly doses of tylenol that nobody mentions because tylenol is OTC for undiagnosed headaches. Who cares that Tylenol is more no-shit toxic than gluten and the parents, obviously, can't pharmacologically distinguish their own asses from a hole in the ground, let alone a child's? Who cares that being raised on Butterburgers and Tylenol is going to cripple your kid far worse metabolically than gluten would, even if they were gluten sensitive? Who cares that such systemic behavior would utterly fuck a medical system predicated on the ongoing lower cost of young, healthy adults? Who cares that it even carries adverse repercussions on systems, like education, that really have nothing to do with nutrition/biochemistry? Who cares that centuries of biological and medical science have shown that the pH of the food you consume has precisely dick to do with the overproduction of acid in the stomach?
So, yeah, all the hucksterism and Munchausen by proxy under the guise of science hits a nerve. You want to end the FDA? End it because it obstructs the free market. All of it. Not just the part that you think causes your baby to cry right now.
Next thing you’re gonna tell us is we need to get rid of participation trophies!
never dropped below 9.5 lbs. Now he's 13 and, because he hits the gym
Holy shit. A 13 pound baby is working out at the gym.
Yeah, but he occasionally suffers heartburn so we really ought to do something about the FDA.
I'm sure Secretary Pete had no problem with getting baby formula.
"Getting formula is as easy as riding a bike to work"
-pete
That's what you get for supporting leftism
I agree, but unfortunately Reason no longer seems to present the libertarian causes or solutions/approaches to the problem. They used to many years ago. Mrs. (a sexist would say) Pierce only nod to this was "Worse yet, these regulations are more driven by bureaucratic and political interests than by science."
The problem was caused first by government regulating baby formula, rather than allowing the free market to do it, second by failures of the FDA to regularly inspect the facility (not that I agree the FDA should be doing this) and closed it down without proof that some dead babies were dead because of the formula produced at the plant. I'd bet the politically connected baby formula makers, sought FDA regulation, to keep the competition at bay and to ensure nice profits, but this wasn't researched by the author. Prohibition of baby formula imports of stuff you can freely buy overseas, is just another example of political favoritism to Big Pharma that makes baby formula, at increased costs to US consumers. They're protecting their profits, and the politician is protecting his campaign contributions he gets for legislating favors or convincing a bureaucrat to hand over those favors.
Free markets are the solution, including for ensuring the safety of baby formula. Government just demonstrated it is a failure in providing baby formula.
Seems like Reason Apparatchiks were ordered to bang the "No Tariffs Drum" this week. Needz moar Kochvbux!
Instead of correctly criticizing the FDA's power to regulate our health, they dance this issue into Europe and Trade.
Anyone know of an actual libertarian magazine that advocates banning prescription drugs laws and leaving us *free to choose* the medicine we want without having to beg a government enabled rent seeking mafia for a permission slip to do so?
Another article about the easing import restrictions and not easing regulations strangling domestic production and redistribution?
I really don't know why, if they're so overwhelmingly interested in the baby formula issue, they don't just go in-depth on the way subsidies have reshaped the market. It's libertarian gold, talking about how government has spent years fucking up a particular industry, and since the roots of this issue are 30 years old, you can go all in with the Both Sides. We can literally say this problem dates back to the first Bush Administration, and every administration since has piled on in ways that have made the problem even worse.
It took a long time to get our formula industry this fucked up. It would be a great story for libertarians to actually talk about how government destroying the free market creates problems that have consequences far-reaching down the line.
On the other hand, however, if a mother is able to breast-feed her newborn baby, it's better for both the baby and for the mother. Breastfeeding strengthens the baby's immune system, and helps produce the hormone oxytocin, which facilitates the various bonding and communication processes in both humans and animals.
Do they sell the same formula for adults? Seems like a simple solution, just order that one then.
"Worse yet, these regulations are more driven by bureaucratic and political interests than by science. These products, after all, have not caused a wave of problems for European babies."
At the risk of being snarky, what's your point? Honestly, of course you're right but what bureaucracy has _ever_ been willing to risk a public blunder if the only payoff is reduced control and happier consumers? That's just completely not compelling to them.
For what it's worth, you're not alone. Not every family can breastfeed so formula is a literal lifesaver. It was with our two kids. And our first, like yours, had a very sensitive digestion. We only found one brand she could thrive on. Thank goodness we had that brand available.
I shudder to think what new parents are going through now. There's no worse feeling that seeing an infant cry because they're hungry and not being able to do a damn thing about it. I defy anyone who's been in that boat to justify blocking imports.
Why would a newborn with heartburn require acid reducing medicine? The esophageal sphincter responds to the acid levels in the stomach. In crappy old people like me, it's entirely possible the muscle is inadequate to close by itself but it strikes me as highly unlikely in a newborn with no developmental issues. To this day my go-to for heartburn is still lemon, lime juice, or vinegar and I find it works far better than tums or rolaids even though I'm an olds, as the kiddies would say.
Hint: The kid's esophageal sphincter is almost certainly normal for someone who hasn't been using their digestive system for 9 mos. and the problem isn't his digestive system or the FDA, but a mother who thinks "Babies are only allowed to eat breast milk or formula that doesn't discomfort them in any way."
I made $30k in just 5 weeks working part-time right from my apartment. When I lost my last business I got tired right away and luckily I found this job online and with that I am able to start reaping lots right through my house. Anyone can achieve this top level career and make more money online by:-
Reading this article:>> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com
And the USA isn't producing any goat milk because???????????????
The US is (and others are) producing gigatons of alternative solutions to this "problem", pure whey, casein, soy protein, pea protein, pure cane sugar, corn syrup, rice syrup... the real problem is Pierce was raised on crutches, is complaining that "the FDA" won't let her use the crutches that are 'not too hot and not too cold but just right', and is raising her kid on crutches too.
And people call me cruel for kicking the crutches out from under people who have no reason not to be able to walk. If I didn't believe the religiosity to be irrelevant and consider parallels between myself and Christ to be completely inapt, I'd say it was blasphemous.
But if there are no ridiculous rules, you don't need a bureaucracy to enforce them, and that's obviously a bad thing. See, for example, Sen, Schumer's marijuana legalization bill, which would create whole new realms of enforcement bureaucracy.
Seems like you should be taking a road trip to Canada and load up on formula. Or do you not care for your child enough to do it?