Uvalde Cops Also Held Back the Officer Whose Wife Was Shot and Dying
New body cam footage shows Ruben Ruiz heading toward the classroom to rescue his wife, but other officers stopped him.

During the 77-minute period in which nearly 400 police officers took no collective action to engage and neutralize the Robb Elementary mass shooter who had trapped dozens of dead and wounded second-grade students inside a classroom with him, one officer can be seen heading down the hallway toward the killer's location, according to recently released body cam footage.
The officer was Ruben Ruiz of the Uvalde Police Department. Ruiz was aware of the situation because he had received a call from his wife, Eva Mireles, a Robb Elementary teacher; Mireles, unfortunately, was inside the classroom and dying of a gunshot wound.
In the footage, Ruiz tries to hurry past the other officers and approach the classroom, gun in hand. He is stopped, and held back.
"She said she's shot," he protests, to no avail.
Wow. This is the moment when police kept Uvalde officer Ruben Ruiz, gun in-hand, from storming the classroom where his wife had been shot. (Via @davenewworld_2)
"She said she's shot!" pic.twitter.com/wdcXLWVhqt
— Sawyer Hackett (@SawyerHackett) July 20, 2022
Ruiz appeared in previously released footage, where he could be seen checking his phone. This was cited by some as further evidence of Uvalde P.D.'s lack of urgency, but it's now more understandable: Ruiz was actively prevented from confronting the shooter, and his phone was his only means of contacting his wife.
"What happened to (Ruiz) is he tried to move forward into the hallway, he was detained and they took his gun away from him and they escorted him from the scene," said Texas Department of Public Safety Director Steve McCraw during a hearing last month. The recent video footage matches this description.
Actions taken by other police officers to actively prevent one of their own from attempting to resolve the situation are consistent with what was happening outside the school, where officers restrained and even handcuffed parents who were desperately trying to intervene. One mother, Angeli Gomez, was handcuffed and arrested, but escaped custody and entered the school anyway, where she found and rescued her children.
The decision by Uvalde police to wait—and wait, wait, and wait—before confronting the shooter runs counter to all police training on school mass shooting scenarios. Ever since the Columbine mass shooting in 1999, law enforcement have been instructed to immediately rush the shooter without waiting for backup, better equipment, or for the right moment. Uvalde police had also received training that called for them to confront the mass shooter without delay, according to The New York Times.
But on May 24, 2022, when the shooter attacked the school, the police did everything wrong for more than an hour. They waited for more officers, for tactical gear and better weaponry, and incomprehensibly failed to procure a key for a door that was not even locked. It was failure after failure, even though some people were still alive inside the classroom and frantically dialing 9-1-1 for help. A swifter response would have put officers' lives in greater danger, but it would have also allowed medical personnel to assist the victims more quickly. It's not clear how many lives could have been saved this way—if any—but every minute the survivors remained trapped in that classroom increased the risk to them, to say nothing of their mental anguish.
Ruiz's wife, Eva Mireles, succumbed to her wounds after speaking with him.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So, the guy who's coworkers are going to have a training accident and we are all going to collectively agree to look no further.
If that was my wife I would be having as many accidents as possible as soon as possible.
I without a doubt have made $18k inside a calendar month thru operating clean jobs from a laptop. As I had misplaced my ultimate business, I changed into so disenchanted and thank God I searched this easy task (neh-09) accomplishing this I'm equipped to reap thousand of bucks simply from my home. All of you could really be part of this pleasant task and will gather extra cash on-line
travelling this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
I'm willing to be generous, but do not see how half a dozen specific houses burning to the ground can be construed as a training accident.
he was detained and they took his gun away from him and they escorted him from the scene
Never forget this. His wife bled to death while his co-workers and superiors covered their asses.
The US courts have repeatedly rejected lawsuits over situations like this. Maybe they will pay more attention if a cop is the plaintiff. He should sue everyone involved.
Lawsuits won't change anything. Even if he (against all precedent) wins, it will be paid by the taxpayers. The real criminals suffer no consequences.
The current system is a recipe for vigilantism. If the police and prosecutors continue to refuse to police their own, eventually the people are going to take matters into their own hands.
Haha. Wow.
I'm actually curious, like, what's the next thing gonna be?
"I'm actually curious, like, what's the next thing gonna be?"
Kinda like Tony's case of Stupid, every time you think he's hit the peak, he shows he's got a bit more.
Not sure why these cops haven't been charged with obstruction, accessory, etc.
Aiding and abetting
So many conspiracy theories I could invent to explain how horrible these cops were. Pretty sure one if the cops in charge was a gun control plant who wanted the murder count as high as possible.
We need to bring back the pillory for these guys.
They did it with ventilators for covid, why not gun control?
They should have called Eli Dickson (mall shooter good guy) and Nicholas Bostic (pizza delivery guy who rescued several kids from a burning home), turned the scene over to them, and left to go home. More of those children would be alive today.
They could have called in Hong Kong Fooey and Quck Draw McGraw (both fictional characters from Hannah-Barbera cartoons) to turn the scene over to and achieved basically the same result they got.
Any group of random bystanders would have probably saved lives in that situation compared to the law enforcement response that actually happened.
The video I saw is that he walked slowly towards the room where his wife was like he as 'delivering the mail or bringing her ice cream on a hot summer's day'. He didn't see to have a care in the world. One officer meekly put his hand on his shoulder and said something and the big brave husband turned around on a dime without any protesting and walked away from danger. Any other husband would have steamrolled the blockade and be held down by six men and then shot with a knock out potion.
Cops are generally not independent thinkers, much less iconoclasts. They are, by nature training and conditioning, followers.
When the first few cops on scene failed to follow the new dicta of immediately confronting the shooter they set up a preference cascade for subsequent arrivals. As the number of those arrivals stacked up it further impeded anyone from taking offensive action.
This is beyond incompetence and cowardice. This is enemy action.
-jcr
True. Insofar as a bureaucratic institution designed to protect itself is not going to take any risks to protect anyone else.
Said it early on, and I'll say it again. If cops did as good a job defending children as they do defending each other then many more would have lived.
He needs to immediately sue his fellow officers, the people that authorized his removal and anyone connected to it. If he does it will be very interesting watching his fellow officers justify their cowardice in open court!
376 to 1, and the 1 killed 19 people. Hope the 376, less the Border Patrol guy, can live with that. "Back the blue", my ass, not after Uvalde.
The thin blue line wasn't thin enough.
The most recent repost has "systems" failing; pretty sure that should be spelled "balls".
Just think, a single 22 year old, armed with a Glock pistol ended a mass shooter's dirty deed. And it took him about 15 seconds to do it.
I don't know how many heavily armed police officers were in place at that school in Uvalde but it was many. As TooChilly says, only you are responsible for your safety.
Cowards one and all.
You know that's why people like the kid in Indiana should wait until the cops show up instead of doing something stupid like put the shooter down in under 30 seconds.
If he had waited they'd probably still be delivering takeout pizza to the perp while trying to negotiate access to the wounded, after all it's only been about 72 hours.
That 376 number is still mind blowing to me. That's 10x more than the number of people on Flight 93 who self-organized their counterattack on 9/11 on the basis of a small group of people who didn't know each other but who had high school team athletics experience.
That was the event that made me realize that militia is still a very valuable security measure for a society. What if a large number of them had had boot camp or some other sort of defense training?
But 10x more? And most of them with probably the same training experience in the same unit? It's almost like there is some group psychology thing going on - bystander effect or Kitty Genovese syndrome.
They're quick to bust in during the middle of the night, though!
Even the NYT, original source of the "heard the screams but did nothing" narrative, has issued a correction. Quoted in Wikipedia from the Times' 2016 obit of the killer:
"While there was no question that the attack occurred, and that some neighbors ignored cries for help, the portrayal of 38 witnesses as fully aware and unresponsive was erroneous. The article grossly exaggerated the number of witnesses and what they had perceived. None saw the attack in its entirety. Only a few had glimpsed parts of it, or recognized the cries for help. Many thought they had heard lovers or drunks quarreling. There were two attacks, not three. And afterward, two people did call the police. A 70-year-old woman ventured out and cradled the dying victim in her arms until they arrived. Ms. Genovese died on the way to a hospital."
Curiously, when the article came out the cops were facing some scandals, and one of the cop bosses fed the story to the Times, perhaps to take the focus off police misconduct in other cases and onto a case of supposed civilian irresponsibility.
"We have to support the cops, because one day we may need them to stop a crazed killer!"
Ruben Ruiz should sue the City of Uvalde and their police department.
The nearly 80-page report was the first to criticize both state and federal law enforcement, and not just local authorities in the Texas town, for the bewildering inaction by heavily armed officers as a gunman fired inside a fourth-grade classroom.
“At Robb Elementary, law enforcement responders failed to adhere to their active shooter training, and they failed to prioritize saving innocent lives over their own safety,” the report said.
The gunman fired approximately 142 rounds inside the building, and it is “almost certain” that 100 shots came before any officer entered, according to the report.
https://worldabcnews.com/first-responders-who-rushed-to-uvalde-school-shooting-did-not-prioritize-saving-lives-new-report-says/
"and it is “almost certain” that 100 shots came before any officer entered, according to the report"
Even if accurate it's an attempt to elide responsibility.
Because it was a rifle, not an instant death ray. There is a thing called the golden hour - when you have the best chance to save a still living trauma victim.
No telling how many could have been saved if the cops - who arrived mere minutes after the shooting started - had taken action, but it is almost certainly a non zero figure.
Children were bleeding out and they stood around in a defensive posture. That none of those involved cops have subsequently eaten the muzzle of their service weapon only serving to confirm their craven cowardice.