Better Immigration Laws Could Help Lower Food Prices
The Senate is considering legislation that would improve the visa program for temporary agricultural workers and help relieve labor shortages that push food prices higher.

Food prices in the U.S. have ballooned alongside inflation, now up 10.4 percent over the past year. One solution to that issue may come in the form of an immigration bill that Republicans and Democrats in the Senate are now negotiating.
Known as the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, the measure was sponsored by Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D–Calif.) and Dan Newhouse (R–Wash.) and passed the House twice last year. It aims to improve the immigration mechanics behind the U.S. agricultural workforce, expanding legal pathways available to foreign workers and the domestic farmers who hope to hire them.
The ability to hire more agricultural workers translates into more helping hands for farmers and increased production of goods, which then means fewer food shortages and lower prices at the grocery store. "Consumers are seeing high costs of milk, produce, fruits, meat, and eggs in the supermarket because the Senate has not acted," said Rebecca Shi, executive director of the American Immigration Business Coalition, in a press conference last week. Likewise, Newhouse expressed that the bill is an important step necessary to "fix our broken immigration system and combat the rising cost of food in our country."
A broad coalition with multi-pronged interests backs the legislation. It attracted the support of 30 Republican representatives, over 250 farmers/producers associations, and over 100 organizations involved in immigration advocacy, labor, and economic growth.
The bill would establish a program for foreign agricultural workers "to earn legal status through continued agricultural employment." That status would be contingent upon an individual working "at least 180 days in agriculture over the last 2 years" and would then be renewable if he or she performs farm work at least 100 days per year.
The legislation would also reform "the H-2A temporary agricultural worker program to provide more flexibility for employers, while ensuring critical protections for workers." Particularly notable is a section that would help address the high demand for agricultural workers by "providing up to 20,000 H-2A visas per year (for 3 years) for dairy and other year-round agricultural employers," "allowing the year-round H-2A cap to increase or decrease annually thereafter based on labor metrics" and worker shortages, and "increasing the number of green cards that are available for employer sponsorship."
In its current form, the H-2A program puts farmers and foreign workers through an expensive and complicated process. The program has over 200 rules, and according to a 2014 study by the American Farm Bureau Federation, "72 percent of growers reported that workers arrived" an average of 22 days after the date they were needed—a critical delay in agricultural work. That study also found that "farmers and even professional H-2A agents are routinely forced to hire lawyers" to navigate the process. And because it's so difficult to secure legal status, only a small share of foreign agricultural workers actually do. As of last year, under 10 percent of all farmworkers in the U.S. were H-2A visa holders. Roughly half of all hired crop farmworkers are undocumented.
"Increasing legal pathways like H-2A will ease pressure on the southern border by decreasing the number of individuals—particularly single adults—who seek to cross without authorization, all while filling critical labor needs," says Danilo Zak, policy and advocacy manager for the National Immigration Forum. "Passing this bill would demonstrate what real bipartisan compromise on immigration can look like in 2022: An earned pathway to status for a targeted undocumented population paired with proper and effective enforcement of the system."
A sticking point in Senate negotiations over the bill, according to NPR, has been a provision in the House version that would allow H-2A workers to sue their employers if they think they've broken labor laws. Proponents of the bill argue that it already outlines ample protections for migrant workers.
Those deliberations may delay passage, and the upcoming midterms may change the balance of support. Still, at a time when even incremental immigration measures are polarizing, the bill represents a bipartisan agreement that immigration reform can help alleviate some of the country's most pressing problems.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"We need more wetbacks to come pick our food."
Great take.
Given that the farmer himself only sees about 40% of the retail price of produce, just how do you figure more cheap labor is going to result in significantly lower prices?
The cost of produce is mostly the cost of storage and transportation, not farm labor. Even if the cost of labor doubled, the effect on the retail price would be negligible.
BINGO.
Better Immigration Laws Could Help Lower Food Prices
Better Immigration Law: Build the Wall!
Fuck off Fiona and your hammer.
Kids used to do a lot of this work. Builds character they say. But then along came mommy government to protect the poor babies, safety safety safety, can't let them do work anymore. Nope.
Bringing in more people to eat the food won’t lower prices of food.
You know what would be far better than hire third world serfs to work in this country? Importing food from the nations where those people come from.
Not only would that help those nations develop and become more prosperous, it would also result in even lower prices, since those nations have much less overhead than the US. And it would mean that the US could stop doing utterly ridiculous things like drain its aquifers to farm in deserts.
^^^This^^^
Cheaper labor makes all labor cheaper. Do they expect these immigrants will pick fruit until they die or will they move on to better jobs so we have to bring in more immigrants?
Because "Americans bad" is Reason's religion?
Have YOU ever given up YOUR welfare check... Or your HUGE payout for commenting on Reason.com... And, instead, worked at picking fruits and veggies?
Kids used to do a lot of it. But that's pretty much illegal now. Heck, that's the original purpose of summer break.
Yes, but because they're subject to labor laws, the price of labor goes up, hence the price of the produce they work on goes up as well.
Nope. Members of my family from my grandparents generation used to head from their homes in San Francisco to the orchards in Concord to pick fruit.
I grew up on a cherry farm before the switch to mechanical pickers. My Dad tried hiring local labor for the cherry harvest to avoid having to find or provide temporary housing for migrant labor. That was a disaster. It's not just that the local workers were slower and less motivated, even though they were paid by the pound of cherries - many of them picked only the easily reached bottoms of the trees. We couldn't hand a tree with the easy part picked out to a different worker, so I wound up spending 12 hours a day up a ladder picking the tops, for weeks.
In comparison, a migrant family would all pitch in, working together to pick all of each tree clean, and they worked very quickly. I've never seen harder-working people than those despised Mexican migrant workers, with one exception. That was a crew of about 80 young black men from somewhere down south that pre-arranged contracts with the big corporate orchards and chartered a bus to come north for the picking season. We did not have the housing or a big enough orchard for them, but one summer Dad got lucky; the corporate orchards that hired them mis-estimated the starting date, so they were idle waiting for the cherries to ripen. Our cherries ripened sooner, and that crew picked every cherry in just three days.
I’m amazed it hasn’t killed itself. Intentionally or not.
You mean pretty much done by illegals?
As the influx of Canadian immigrants has left little room in America for agriculturalists from warmer climes, progressives should demand an increase in Canadian emigration to Mexico , which would also make more room for Latin American emigration to Canada.
Summer break was NEVER for the kids to work on farms. It was an urban innovation from before air conditioning, so (relatively wealthy) families could get out of the cities in the summer heat.
The timing is wrong for farming. Planting is done in the spring before school lets out, and most of the harvest in the fall, after school starts again. If the school schedule was set by the farm areas, it would either be 4 to 6 months of intensive instruction over the coldest and wettest months and 6 to 8 months off when farm work was possible, or there would be breaks in spring and fall, and back to school in summer when the work load is lighter.
Are you sure? Maybe she did a good job going down on ENB?
Get your fat, lazy ass out there, pick fruits and veggies, and build yourself some character, then, PRONTO! Smug gringo!
When I was in HS and college (1970s), it was easy to pick-up a few extra bucks picking fruit on peach and pear farms north of Los Angeles. A bus would pick us up from a parking lot, and we would fill-out employment paperwork while riding the bus. We'd work a lot of hours, be handed a pay check, and then ride the bus back to the parking lot.
If we wanted, we could do it again the next day (or not). The money was actually pretty good, although only available for a few weeks during picking season.
I without a doubt have made $18k inside a calendar month thru operating clean jobs from a laptop. As I had misplaced my ultimate business, I changed into so disenchanted and thank God I searched this easy task (ky-13) accomplishing this I'm equipped to reap thousand of bucks simply from my home. All of you could really be part of this pleasant task and will gather extra cash on-line
travelling this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
I made $30k in just 5 weeks working part-time right from my apartment. When I lost my last business I got tired right away and luckily I found this job online and with that I am able to start reaping lots right through my house. Anyone can achieve this top level career and make more money online by:-
.
Reading this article:>>>> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
What is the injury rate for the pickers on ladders? What is the pay?