America's Fishing Industry Is Getting Caught Up in the Trade War
Seafood prices have gone up by double digits as tariffs and inflation drive up costs for consumers

The American fishing industry is caught in the middle of the ongoing trade war between the U.S. and China—hooked by tariffs imposed on both sides of the Pacific.
As a result, U.S. exports of seafood have fallen to their lowest levels in a decade. That's in large part due to the tariffs that have made the industry "less competitive and less affordable," according to a filing by the National Fisheries Institute, an industry group, to the International Trade Commission (USITC) ahead of a hearing scheduled to take place on Thursday.
In prepared testimony for the hearing, the National Fisheries Institute alleges that trade disputes and subsequent waves of tariffs have eroded decades of growth for America's commercial seafood industry, which is dominated by small family-owned fisheries.
When the Trump administration imposed those tariffs in 2018, lawmakers from states with large fishing industries sounded the alarm but were ignored. "It has clearly rattled my state," Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R–Alaska) said in a 2018 Senate hearing exchange with then-U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer. "Our seafood industry is the number one private industry in terms of the jobs and the economic opportunity it brings."
Tariffs on seafood have hit Alaska in particular, Alaska's fishing industry generates over $5 billion dollars in economic activity and creates nearly 70,000 jobs in the state, making it a vital lifeline for the state. Over 40 percent of U.S.-caught Alaskan salmon and one-third of all seafood from Alaska is exported to China each year. Much of it is processed in China and then re-imported to the United States for sale in grocery stores.
As the National Fisheries Institute points out, this split processing stream has contributed to rising seafood costs for U.S. consumers, as China's retaliatory tariffs hit seafood when imported for processing and the original U.S. tariffs hit products upon their return to American shores.
Shipments of fish have consequently seen aggregate duty rates of upward of 45 percent in some cases. These costs are almost always passed along to consumers.
Regulators have, in the past, granted fisheries exclusions from tariffs for some specific re-imported fish products. Lately, though, regulators have refrained from offering broad exclusions to American-caught fish that's been re-imported from China.
That has come at the expense of American producers, who have seen Chinese processors pivot away from purchasing U.S.-caught fish, amounting to a $500 million loss in the export market.
As one Alaska-based operator represented by the National Fisheries Institute, the Freezer Longline Coalition, explained in the filing, tariffs have "caused many FLC member company customers in the U.S., China and elsewhere … to refrain from the purchase of seafood from FLC member companies and other U.S. seafood harvesters."
Tariffs on fish imported from China have caused some American importers to shift to Russian suppliers. Since 2014, imports of Russian-caught pollock and other fish have increased by 173 percent, with much of that increase coming in the aftermath of the China tariffs.
For consumers, meanwhile, these costs are discouraging consumption of fish, according to a February study published by data analytics firms IRI and 210 Analytics. That month alone, sales of frozen seafood products decreased by 9.4 percent, while fresh seafood sales decreased by 12 percent.
Tariffs contributed to seafood prices rising faster than overall inflation in recent months. And consumers are responding by buying less fish: Sales of seafood products have continuously dropped across the board, sparking more worries for the fishing industry as it struggles to compete.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Russia? OMG!
In fact, I made $30,030 in just 5 weeks working part-time right from my apartment. When I lost my last business I got tired right away and luckily I found this job online and with that I am able to start reaping lots right through my house. Anyone can achieve this top level career and make more money online by:-
.
Reading this article:>>>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
You had me at tariffs.
I without a doubt have made $18,000 inside a calendar month thru operating clean jobs from a laptop. As I had misplaced my ultimate business, I changed into so disenchanted and thank God I searched this easy task accomplishing this I'm equipped to reap thousand of bucks simply from my home. All of you could really be part of this pleasant task and will gather
extra cash on-line.... http://oldprofits.blogspot.com
Oh come on! Why not pick on taxes that Democrats raise? Huh? Why all this focus on Trump? Because he's a Republican, and Reason is in the tank for the Democrats. That's why.
Did I get that right?
No.
You're right. Not enough crying.
Don’t sell yourself short. You cry constantly here.
I without a doubt have made $18k inside a calendar month thru operating clean jobs from a laptop. As I had misplaced my ultimate business, I changed into so disenchanted and thank God I searched this easy task (ky-14) accomplishing this I'm equipped to reap thousand of bucks simply from my home. All of you could really be part of this pleasant task and will gather extra cash on-line
travelling this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
Well in this particular case, Team Blue also now bears responsibility for the tariffs since they kept them going.
It's different though. Trump is a genius who was playing five-dimensional chess. By backing out of trade agreements and starting trade wars he was going to convince other countries to engage in free trade. So his tariffs were great.
Biden on the other hand is a dumbass who is in denial of inflation and who won't lower tariffs to lower prices for Americans.
Always judge the policy by who is in charge, not the policy itself.
Oh I see. So because Trump is a patriot, his tariffs are legit. But because Biden is a socialist dumbass, his tariffs (which are the same as Trump's tariffs) are horrible. Is that it?
https://www.theblaze.com/news/biden-considers-invoking-emergency-powers-to-enact-climate-alarmist-agenda-report?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Gear up for Sri lanka type food shortage
I recomend getting a. . 22 rifle for small game hunting, and an ar15 for defend g your food stores
Seems like… we could process our own salmon, instead of exporting it and re-importing it.
I mean, I have a knife
I grew up in a town that had a good-sized fishing industry. My grandfather was a VP at a proccessing plant. The fishing boats were everywhere. We used to get donuts after church and sit and watch them come into the harbor.
Then it all got bought up by multinationals, fishermen got nickel and dimed into bankruptcy and sold their boats, and now work for pennies for the multinationals. The processing plants are mostly closed, including my grandfather's.
But they replaced it with a great meth trade, so there's that.
WTF? We are sending food to China to be processed and sent back to us? We've learned nothing from the recent shipping woes? China can at any time halt food coming into this country. If we're so insistent on cheap labor why aren't we building processing plants in Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, etc.
Because then the processing company would have to build the plant. In China (which is the same distance away from the Aleutians as central America) it's built with fake money and processed by labor that's even cheaper than Honduras. Less crime than Guatemala. More slave labor available. And doing business there hopefully means you can sell in country because you know what palms to grease, and China will take all your less desirable fish.
Of course, anyone who does business with China gets what they deserve when the shit hits the fan. But this is Reason and they like to pretend China plays on the same economic playing field as the rest of the world and we should be able to use all the Uighur slave labor we want, as long to make consumer prices slightly cheaper as it's on the other side of the world and we don't have to look at it.
Team Red and Team Blue arguments will be moot once we overfish ourselves to extinction. Fishing hauls peaked in the 80’s and even plankton is at a catastrophically low level which could soon mean dead seas everywhere.
Not to be insensitive to people’s jobs but since fishing is the prime cause of declining fish (and rising temperatures once we lose that carbon sink), anything that means less fish consumption will only help.
Any ideas on how to convince billions of people to cut back on eating fish? Making a cool marketing campaign?
Can't they just substitute bees?