How Tariffs Are Making Summer Fun More Expensive, Less Safe
The U.S. International Trade Commission will hear from businesses harmed by tariffs at a hearing on Thursday.

Tariffs aren't merely making summer fun more expensive—they are also making it potentially more dangerous too.
"Life Saver is not a misnomer," writes Neil Mooney, an attorney representing Life Saver Pool Fence Systems, Inc., in testimony submitted earlier this month to the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC), which later this week will hold a hearing on the economic impact of the multitude of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration in 2018.
For a company like Life Saver, which manufactures fencing meant to keep children away from unsupervised pools where they might accidentally drown, the tariffs have hiked the cost of raw materials imported from China. In his written testimony, Mooney estimates that the company has paid about $1.2 million in tariffs over the past four years—and has twice had to raise prices "specifically because of the tariffs."
"The imposition of the Section 301 tariffs has forced Life Saver to raise its prices which inevitably has led to lower sales volume and therefore fewer protected pools," writes Mooney. "The economic impact of the Section 301 tariffs is not only felt by Life Saver and other similar businesses and their employees, but also by the end consumers—American families."
Are higher taxes on Chinese-made imports worth leaving American children marginally less safe?
Apparently so, at least for the past two presidential administrations. Former President Donald Trump used Section 301 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1974 to impose tariffs on a wide range of goods imported from China in several phases during 2018 and 2019. As a result, the average tariff rate applied to goods from China effectively doubled. Cumulatively, Americans have paid about $136 billion in higher costs as a result of those import taxes—that's about $1,000 per household, according to research by the National Taxpayers Union, a nonprofit that opposes the tariffs.
Tariffs are adding to inflation, too. A study by the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a trade-focused think tank, found that repealing tariffs could reduce overall inflation by about 1 percentage point. Despite that, the Biden administration has so far been unwilling to do more than talk about repealing the tariffs imposed by Trump.
Perhaps this week's hearing in front of the USITC will make the case for a new trade strategy. On Thursday, business owners and industry lobbyists will have a chance to spell out how the tariffs have resulted in slower growth and higher consumer prices. Later this year, the commission is expected to publish a report that could help guide American trade policy in the future (though it's worth noting that a similar series of hearings in 2018 did nothing to stop the onslaught of tariffs, despite dozens of business owners testifying against them).
Pool fencing is, of course, just one example of a niche product that's been affected by four years of an ineffective trade war. Among other businesses and trade associations set to testify on Thursday are makers of outdoor equipment, sporting goods, and brewers.
Fred Ferguson, a vice president at Vista Outdoor, a Minnesota-based company that manufactures a line of bicycling accessories, including helmets, will tell the commission that the U.S. should "rescind tariffs altogether on protective headwear utilized for safety purposes cyclists and other action sports participants," according to a written statement submitted earlier this month.
Tariffs on pool fencing and bike helmets make about as much sense as the tariffs on personal protective equipment that left American hospitals less prepared, in winter 2020, to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. They're also a useful illustration of how both Trump and Biden trade policies could actively harm Americans in ways that go beyond higher prices.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Taxes do not equal inflation.
If you removed all taxes and tarrifs today, inflation would still be high.
(that being said there should be no income or property tax and only a usage tax)
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (kzy-027) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line
visiting this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://earncash91.tk
Where does the lost value go when money get created? To the money creators who depreciate by increasing the supply. This makes money creation a hidden tax and very few know it, understand it, so it's going to continue until the public gets wise.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eXWhbUUE4ko
Re my already did a better version of your for the children argument
Why are there more articles about tariffs than income taxes, capital gains taxes, and estate taxes? Why is it this one variety of tax is especially evil?
Because libertarians are big supporters of free trade, even if it's unilateral.
Because this place is often like a Curb Your Enthusiasm table read. Larry’s love life hardest hit
I mean, if I'm cynical, I'm looking at this as the sole reason:
the economic impact of the multitude of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration in 2018.
That Trump used tariffs, and therefore this is a cudgel to use against him from a libertarian basis. "Well libertarians hate taxes, and he did cut taxes...but wait, tariffs! We can hit him with this for YEARS!"
Surely it's not pure TDS, right? Deciding that since libertarians hate Trump, the most effective cudgel against him is to talk about taxes he added, instead of talking about the taxes he cut.
Because, let's be frank, if we have to have taxes, tariffs are far from the worst variety.
Tariffs are the best because they're regressive. They take a higher percentage of a poor person's income than that of someone who isn't poor. This is great because it forces them to buy 'Murkin stuff that they couldn't afford back when the foreign stuff was cheaper!
They're grrrrreat!
Punishing the poor people who can't even afford fences around their swimming pools?
It does take some thinking to come up with an absurd question like that.
Look who didn't read the article.
Look who's acting like the only tariff the article mentioned is the one on pool accessories.
Tariffs have always disproportionately affected the rich.
Hey now. Don't point out democrats still want to end the Trump tax cuts.
I will also add to your last sentence. Ignoring the added costs to domestic goods from theft and security costs and only focusing on tariff responses to anti free market actors doing the above is silly.
Anti market actions from foreign trade partners add tens of billions in costs to consumers. It also reduces incentive to IP investments. Every dollar spent on security to stop foreign hacking and protect development is a "tax" in the same sense a tariff is. It adds to cost of goods sold.
Yet not once has reason discussed these issues.
Taxes are an expense, but expenses are not taxes. The logical implication only goes one way.
T -> E is true
E -> T is not
Therefore E T, which you are asserting, is false.
Arg, there was a tautology between E and T but it must violate some html bs.
E T is false
Won't let me do shift-comma dash shift-period. Hm.
Because Reason is a globalist totalitarian rag
Ah, the "globalist" potshot.
Nardz would much prefer a top-man telling him what he can and cannot buy from overseas - and how much in taxes/fees he is subject to pay.
Because bohem needs to justify his Biden vote to himself
two reasons.... first, they are being used specifically to bypass free market forces.
second, it is easier for those not already with us about taxes in general to understand. the government is taxing it, and you have to pay more as a result. there is no class warfare/ fair share BS to deflect from the very real fact that the government is costing everyone money.
Actually your first is wrong. Go look at the statements for why he passed many of the tariffs. It was a response to anti free marker actions like theft.
Only idiots believe China operates under a free market.
Only retards assert that people making arguments against punitive taxes on Americans who buy stuff from China believe China operates under a free market.
It is a bad faith argument.
The entire point of the tactics was as a bargaining chip to get China to negotiate better trading conditions... specifically opening their markets, but also other concessions on IP, etc.
Unfortunately, this was more than a 2 year process.
They're also a useful illustration of how both Trump and Biden trade policies could actively harm Americans in ways that go beyond higher prices.
Isn't that boaf sidez? You can't say that. Trump's economic policy was good and Biden's economic policy is bad. Doesn't matter if it's the same policy. What matters is who, not what. Don't you know anything?
Cato:
5 Years Later the United States Is Still Paying for Its TPP Blunder
Last month—January 23 to be exact—marked the five‐year anniversary of President Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the Trans‐Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement. The country has been paying for it ever since.
Comprised of the United States and eleven other Pacific Rim countries—including economic heavyweight Japan—the TPP was found by a 2016 Cato analysis to result in net trade liberalization. A study by the U.S. International Trade Commission calculated a real U.S. GDP increase of $42.7 billion through 2032 as a result of TPP membership while a Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) working paper foresaw gains to U.S. real incomes of $131 billion through 2030.
But the United States withdrew from the TPP, and those gains never happened.
The TPP, however, was aimed at more than just lowering trade barriers. It was also an attempt by the United States—along with like‐minded allies—to help shape the rules governing trade in the Asia‐Pacific region. As Asia’s center both geographically and economically, China is already assured of having a significant say in such matters. The TPP was meant to ensure the United States had a prominent seat at the table when such rules were being hammered out—before it opted to push away.
https://www.cato.org/blog/5-years-later-united-states-still-paying-tpp-blunder
Of course The Dotard wound up doing nothing but raising prices/tariffs on Americans and restricting exports.
(time for Trump Trash to malign Cato)
Oh my God you don't understand. Remember Trump was playing five-dimensional chess? By withdrawing from trade agreements and starting a trade war he was going to usher in a new era of free trade! Remember? But then the election was stolen so he wasn't able to finish the game.
Yeah, I forgot.
It's like that border wall he promised. He was saving the good stuff for his second term.
And he would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for those meddling Democrats!
Still trying to play it like you're not a Team Blue shill or are you just not trying to wear that mask right now?
Do you still beat your wife?
It was a fucking joke comparing Trump to a Scooby Doo villain. You Trump sycophants have no sense of humor.
You just tell bad jokes.
I know you we’re trying to be sarcastic, but it only works if you don’t make those same types of comments when you’re arguing with one of the conservative type posters here.
There was nothing free trade about the TPP. The fact that shrike liked it so much, being an authoritarian douche canoe, should tell you everything you need to know. And, as has been pointed out many times in the past, those countries were free to reduce their tariffs and call Trumps bluff.
Not that I'm ever opposed to blaming stupid policies on Trump, and his "easy to win" trade war was one of the stupidest . But, he's been out of office for a year and a half. I don't see why Biden can't remove those tariffs as easily as Trump imposed them.
Am I missing something?
Are are we still winning?
SleepyJoe wants to add more.
Really Reason? This is the best you can do? I stopped reading as soon as I saw your "example" only pertained to the wealthy/well-off. If you can afford a home with an inground pool, the cost of a fence around your pool is a non-factor. Reason is now staffed with nothing but clowns.
Not to mention that there are plenty of us who grew up before pool fences and bicycle helmets even existed.
You grew up before fences?
Get a freaking clue.
The Federal Government's initial source of income was to be tariffs and taxes on alcohol.
You can whine about the tariffs all you want, but, remember two things.
One. Manufacturers and Unions begged Obama to implement these tariffs and he refused. Trump implemented the very tariffs that they wanted, but, because he did it they are evil.
Two. Biden wasted no time in destroying everything that Trump did, why are the tariffs still there?
Eric Boehm endlessly, "ZERO tax for foreigners!!!"
So what's Eric's take on Domestic Tax??
And why do I hear absolutely nothing about it from him....
Crony Socialism for the WIN!!!??
I can't think of a more suitable way to fund USA National Defenses then by taxing International Goods.
Take the income tax away from the federal government and you solve 90% of the problems in the USA. The fed is the monster it is because of its vast income.
Restrict it to tariffs and see it wither and let peace reign.
Tariffs protected American jobs and the economy for decades. Look what has happened since free trade!
Prices DID NOT GO DOWN when tariffs were lifted. I am happy to hear examples if they did and I missed it.
The main purpose of free trade is to drag down wages in first world countries. Assembly line job wages at car plants have gone DOWN while their profits have gone up. When they agree to build cars in Tennessee they say take these wages or we will just build them in Mexico or China instead.
Is this an ad for the US Chamber of Commerce. We need to increase tariffs on China. Take the fake articles off this site.