Review: When Britain Banned Home Sales of The Exorcist
Even as it gained fans around the world, home sales of the film remained illegal in the U.K. until 1999.

Sometimes called the scariest movie of all time, The Exorcist provoked controversy from its 1973 release. The Motion Picture Association of America shocked Roger Ebert when it gave the film an R rating, allowing minors to view it in theaters when accompanied by an adult.
The U.K. equivalent of that body took a harder line. There, the movie—which graphically depicts the travails of a girl suffering demonic possession—got an X certificate, prohibiting viewing by anyone under 18. In 1988, the British Board of Film Classification took the further step of halting its sale on home video entirely. "At the cinema it had been relatively easy to ensure that young children would be excluded," the board explains, "but video was a different matter."
Even as it gained fans around the world, home sales of The Exorcist remained illegal in the U.K. until 1999.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "The Exorcist."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
And nobody had a pirate copy.
I actually have made 18,000 dollars within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra
money on-line visiting this site...> http://oldprofits.blogspot.com
Makes $440 to $780 per day on-line work which I received $21894 in one month online performing from home. ggh. I'm a daily student and work just one to a strive of hours in my spare time. everybody will do that job and online raise extra cash by simply
Open HERE:>>> https://dollarscash12.blogspot.com/
Where is the rest of this article?
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (vsg-14) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line
visiting this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
Ah, the "for the children" ethic. Long a foundation of British law, unless the children lived in some far away country, or worked in coal mines, or scrambled on city streets, or acted like soccer hooligans, or..
And, strictly to the movie it doesn't make much sense of it. Like Christine or Inglorious Basterds or Kill Bill or whatever, it's still retarded by there's at least some sense. You actually don't want kids running people over in cars, branding them with swastikas, or hacking each other apart with swords but, The Exorcist? Is the concern they're gonna don priest's robes and *spoiler alert* toss themselves out of windows? Vomit pea soup and spin their own heads around?
Evidently, the era of banning "video nasties" in the U.K. lasted longer than I thought. 🙂
The Young Ones S02E03 "Nasty"
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5nf2qx
By the way, Steffie, the Church probably killed unknown thousands of epileptics thinking that they were "demon-possesed."
Better to just get them away from blunty, pointy, stabbie, shootie things then lay them gently on their side so they don't drown in their own sputum, then count the spasms until help arrives.
Better to just get them away from blunty, pointy, stabbie, shootie things then lay them gently on their side so they don't drown in their own sputum, then count the spasms until help arrives.
This comment makes me want to ask "Have you ever seen an exorcism (movie)?" but, in combination with the rest of your post, makes "Are you generally aware of reality and/or history?" seem like the more appropriate question.
Sure, I seen The Exorcist. As cringy and shocking as it was to watch for the uninitiated, it wasn't real. And it was the butt of parody in the Scary Movie franchise too.
I'm all too aware of reality. What I said is SOP for First Aid on epileptics and seizure patients.
Sure, I seen The Exorcist... I'm all too aware of reality. What I said is SOP for First Aid on epileptics and seizure patients.
Evidently not. "Confine them to a space where they can't hurt themselves or someone else, seek medical help, and monitor them until help arrives." is a fitting description of the first 20-30 min. of the movie. Your cutting-edge, medical expertise for treating epileptics acutely dates back to medieval times (and likely before).
You are aware that, historically, Christians regarded people suffering from seizures (and other neurological conditions) as being seized by The Lord too, and otherwise not executed out of hand, right? You are aware that, historically *and contemporaneously*, Muslims and Buddhists (and others) still regard epilepsy as a spiritual/religious condition and in greater percentages than Christians do, right? That, just because people historically (and currently) haven't understood epilepsy doesn't mean anything with regard to their religion, right?
Perhaps the procedure existed before modern times, but it wasn't actual bedside manner judging from the numbers of exorcisms and Witch-burnings.
And if Epilepsy is a product of either demons or being "seized by the Lord," that God has real shitty prescience and bedside manner. Funny how demon possession only happened to believers and not unbelievers.
And yeah, Muslims and Buddhists and anyone else who doesn't study and embrace state-of-the-art rational, scientific medicine are stupid too. There, I said it.
And what's the point? The Brits had the right idea.
The Exorcist was rereleased in theaters in 1979. I was in the first grade. A girl in my class named Christina had bragged that her grandfather (her guardian) was going to take her to see the film. The following morning, she failed to arrive in class. She was subsequently found weeping in the stairwell, the emotional aftermath of having viewed the movie.
The British government was right to shield children from the film. It should have had an X rating in the United States as well.
The British Board of Film Classification didn't just shield actual children but treated all Citizens as children by banning video sales until 1999.
And that Grandfather sounds like a shitty guardian. I bet he read her the scary stuff from The Holy Bible as well.
Good thing we are wasting time on local stories like Dutch farmers or Sri Lanka or Ghanans dealing with the effects of idiotic Green mandates that spreading all over the world, and are focusing on hard hitting stuff like UK laws that sunsetted in the 20th Century