FDA Approves Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine, but Feds Undecided on Who It's for
Plus: The story of a 10-year-old rape victim who sought an abortion is confirmed, inflation hits a record 9.1 percent, and more...

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted emergency approval to the Novavax vaccine, which is distinct from the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines in that it does not use mRNA technology. Federal health officials hope that some Americans who remain unvaccinated—about 22 percent of all people in the U.S.—will be more comfortable opting for the Novavax vaccine.
The Novavax vaccine will also be a strong option for vaccinated but unboosted Americans. According to The New York Times, the side effects of the Novavax vaccine appear to be milder than the other vaccines, which produce aches and fatigue in many people.
Even so, federal health officials have yet to determine who the vaccine will be for.
"Advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will meet next week and are expected to discuss who should get the Novavax vaccine," the Times reported. "The two-dose vaccine was authorized as a primary immunization series for adults, rather than a booster, which is likely to limit its market at first."
Meanwhile, the BA.5 variant of COVID-19 is spreading, causing cases to rise throughout the country. The variant has a high rate of reinfection: People who previously recovered from COVID-19 are contracting it. This has translated to an increase in hospitalizations, due to the sheer number of vulnerable people contracting the disease—but importantly, the variant has not caused a spike in deaths.
FREE MINDS
The disturbing story out of Ohio that a 10-year-old girl had sought an out-of-state abortion after being raped was confirmed on Wednesday.
The story initially went viral on social media and was even mentioned by President Joe Biden as a reason to oppose the new strict limitations on abortion that Republican-controlled states are implementing. In attempting to confirm it, The Washington Post cast some doubt on whether the story was actually true; Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler could find no evidence that such a crime had actually been reported to the authorities. In response, some conservative media figures began to openly doubt the allegations. A Wall Street Journal editorial described it as "An Abortion Story Too Good to Confirm."
It is now confirmed.
Columbus Dispatch writers Bethany Bruner, Monroe Trombly, and Tony Cook reported that police have arrested 27-year-old Gerson Fuentes for the crime:
Gerson Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.
Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.
Huhn also testified that DNA from the clinic in Indianapolis is being tested against samples from Fuentes, as well as the child's siblings, to confirm contribution to the aborted fetus.
It was not insane to approach the story with some skepticism, given that its single source was someone with only secondhand knowledge of the circumstances. But it is now known that the horrible occurrence was regrettably very real.
Wasn't unreasonable to be a little wary of the story of a raped 10-year-old traveling out of state to avoid govt making her carry her rapists' baby when there wasn't confirmation.
But now there is.
If you told yourself it was made up, time to face what these new laws really do. https://t.co/24niUBQy15— Nicholas Grossman (@NGrossman81) July 13, 2022
Fuentes is believed to be in the U.S. illegally, which is now likely to become the main focus of the conservative response to the story.
FREE MARKETS
A look at the goods hit by inflation. Inflation just hit its highest point in 40 years. According to the consumer price index, prices are up 9.1 percent since this time last year.
Gas price increases were largely responsible for the trend. The price of gas increased by 11 percent since last month and nearly 60 percent over the last 12 months. Food and rent costs also rose precipitously.
Biden said in a statement that fighting inflation was his "top economic priority," but also contended that the numbers were "outdated" and that the price of gas is now falling.
Inflation woes have prompted Sen. Joe Manchin (D–W.Va.) to swear off any new federal spending due to concerns that the government pumping more money into the economy would only exacerbate the problem.
"No matter what spending aspirations some in Congress may have, it is clear to anyone who visits a grocery store or a gas station that we cannot add any more fuel to this inflation fire," said Manchin.
One encouraging note: Costco is refusing to raise the price of its iconic hot dogs.
In an interview Monday on CNBC's "Squawk on the Street," CEO Craig Jelinek had a one-word answer when asked whether he would raise the signature food court item's price: "No."…
The hot dog and soda combo has sold for $1.50 for decades, and was the subject of a Mental Floss article from 2018 that recently began circulating again.
The article recounts a time when Jelinek approached Costco co-founder and former CEO Jim Sinegal. He told him the company was losing money over the iconic food item.
"I came to (Sinegal) once and I said, 'Jim, we can't sell this hot dog for a buck fifty," Jelinek said, according to the Mental Floss article, which cites 425Business. "We are losing our rear ends.' And he said, 'If you raise (the price of the) effing hot dog, I will kill you. Figure it out.' That's all I really needed."
QUICK HITS
• New testimony at the January 6 committee hearings revealed that former President Donald Trump wrote, but did not send, a draft tweet that urged his supporters to march to the Capitol. "Please arrive early, massive crowds expected," he wrote. "March to the Capitol after. Stop the steal!"
• The full video of Uvalde cops waiting in the hallway outside the classroom and failing to confront the shooter has been released; Uvalde's mayor criticized the local media outlet for publishing it.
• Twitter is suing Elon Musk for backing out of his deal to acquire the company.
• New Zealand is bringing back COVID-19 restrictions.
• Rep. Lauren Boebert (R–Colo.) is not a huge fan of separating church and state.
• Eat the rich—literally? Popsicles shaped like the heads of billionaires hit New York City.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted emergency approval to the Novavax vaccine...
Finally coughed up the dough, eh?
Even so, federal health officials have yet to determine who the vaccine will be for.
Oops, maybe not enough dough.
They will probably recommend everyone get a couple jabs of each.
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra
money online visiting this site.> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
I’m being given 100-120$ greenbacks per-hr. to finish a few copy past task on my laptop. I even have definitely now no longer imagined like it might even feasible however my confidant buddy turned into receiving $30k simply in 4 weeks operating this clean opportunity & she has encouraged me to try.
.
For More Details:>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
In case original COVID makes a comeback. Out of an abundance of caution. For the children. And grandma.
Gerson Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed...
The conspiracy theorist in me wonders.
That the arrest only came after conservative media was asking why no arrests if she was raped?
It's also pretty strange that some guy came out of the woodwork and confessed to a serious felony just as the story was falling apart.
Well golly. Is that particular detail of the law written in invisible ink and locked in the AGs political campaign office? Or is part of the law that doctors themselves are able to find out.
Because that AG also kept explaining how all rape investigation and lab evidence goes through his office - so therefore he knows all the legal processes re rape - and therefore if he doesn't know or want to know something then someone else is lying - until AFTER the munis actually arrested a suspect.
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (vsg-10) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line visiting this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
By statue everywhere, if she was pregnant and 10 she was raped.
You didn't understand the question.
Did it have something to do with Immaculate Conception?
No.
Lefty screeching is becoming even more entertaining.
The way I hear it, all conceptions seem to be immaculate, since the unwilling pregnant people are so unhappy and surprised.
Also, I read something where the Ohio AG said they have a rape/incest exception, so she shouldn't have had to travel out of state to get an abortion.
The Oho AG is lying. There is no such exception. He was perfectly happy to previously assert there was no such exception before an actual case popped up. And now he is content to lie. And you are content to lie.
The exception was for the health of the mother. A pregnant 10 yo is considered a hazardous pregnancy and has a medically necessary exception under Ohio law.
Ah ok. Well what about an 11 year old? Is that the age of medically normal by default pregnancy in Ohio?
Would you have been more comfortable if the abortion happened at 8 months and 3 weeks?
I'd be more comfortable if you all weren't so willing to lie about the circumstances and consequences of a kid being raped.
There is a good reason that no one should ever support whatever issue/policy you assholes are willing to lie about. And your ilk attitudes about abortion are about to hit that backlash
I'd be more comfortable if you all weren't so willing to lie about the circumstances and consequences of a kid being raped.
You're the one imposing ridiculous assertions about what constitutes a hazardous pregnancy.
There is a good reason that no one should ever support whatever issue/policy you assholes are willing to lie about. And your ilk attitudes about abortion are about to hit that backlash
Screech all you like, that doesn't change the fact that abortion with no restrictions has never gotten more than 20% support even after 50 years of Roe. The vast majority (i.e., not you) support at least some restrictions on the practice, even if they support abortion as a general policy.
Maybe your ilk should stop lying that abortion all the way up until the feet emerge from the magic birth canal has majority support.
"that doesn't change the fact that abortion with no restrictions has never gotten more than 20% support even after 50 years of Roe."
This. The lefties like to tout that "complete ban on abortion has extremely low approval, only 15%" without telling you that completely unrestricted abortion has a very similar, very low approval.
They obfuscate and try to pretend the majority group that essentially aligns with "legal, safe, rare" and reasonable restrictions are lumped in with the no restrictions group. They absolutely are not.
It would be like lumping in the majority group that thinks trans weirdos shouldn't be physically harmed or harrassed with the group that thinks its a good thing to introduce trans weirdness and talk about sex acts with kindergarteners.
These groups are absolutely not the same, and the overlap is significantly smaller than the lefties gaslight they are
They obfuscate and try to pretend the majority group that essentially aligns with "legal, safe, rare" and reasonable restrictions are lumped in with the no restrictions group. They absolutely are not.
Like I've pointed out before, I don't agree with the "every sperm is sacred" types, and think there needs to be some actual scientific discussion as to when a fetus becomes a conscious being, in order to determine when it's actually deserving of legal protections. If people can be charged with unlawfully terminating a pregnancy when they kill a pregnant woman or cut out the infant against her will, then there's an assumption of legal protections there already that deserve a broader discussion as to when that should happen across the board, and what kind of exceptions might be made.
However, at least the fundies will take a hard stand on when they think life begins, and so will the majority of abortion supporters, since they think some kind of restrictions should be imposed, whether it's at the first trimester, second one, or whatever. The abortion maximalists, however, will wave their hands and cause misdirection, because the second they acknowledge that their position is the minority one, they know they've lost the argument.
You're retarded.
There is a good reason that no one should ever support whatever issue/policy you assholes are willing to lie about. And your ilk attitudes about abortion are about to hit that backlash
Oh, that is fucking rich. You must have pissed yourself giggling at that.
"And your ilk attitudes about abortion are about to hit that backlash"
My friend, there is a huge backlash coming. But you and your lefty pals are the cause and will be the recipients of it.
You have pushed, and pushed, and gone so far beyond the pale, that you think your weird new-atheist/secular cult is the "norm".
Its not, and you are about to find out how people feel about it.
Yo, J, you mad, bro?
Haha.
You no English good.
It’s hard to type proper English when you’re screeching and covering your keyboard with spittle.
And also whacking off.
But it is now known that the horrible occurrence was regrettably very real
Reason’s unflinching trust in law enforcement, when it serves the narrative, duly noted.
The ultimate consequence when institutions make themselves untrustworthy.
To be sure...
Whether he is truly 27? Wonders what?
Wow, the most damning thing the J6 show trial could find was a draft of a tweet nobody saw?
Are you kidding?
Hr threw his lunch! And lunged for a wheel. This is hard time he is looking st
HE SINGLEHANDEDLY TOOK DOWN TWO SECRET SERVICE AGENTS WHILE DRIVING AN SUV FROM THE BACKSEAT!!!1111!!!!11!!
He has the power of the gods.
https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-the-white-returns-at-dawn-on-the-fifth-day-with-army-of-dutch-farmers-and-canadian-truckers
And still just says to march to the Capitol, which, in and of itself, is lawful and what he also said during his speech. I don't see how this is remotely interesting.
Yeah why is this negatively reported in a "libertarian" publication? Is the right of Trump supporters to peaceably assemble a violation of the NAP?
in a "libertarian" publication
Citation????
Can't you hear Trump blowing the dog whistle?
It is possible that that was what Trump was trying to do, but there is does not seem to be anything he explicitly said that can be considered an order to the protesters to invade the Capitol. The committee is assuming that there must be some evidence because they know what was really going on inside Trump's head.
Even if he ordered a protest that is also legal
He didn't "order" it, though. First of all, he is free to organize a protest, just like any other politician, and people can choose to show up or not. Second, as I recall, there were various groups ranging from "somewhat conservative but concerned about the election" to "crazy right-wingers" planning to show up in DC to protest that day.
Literally hundreds of thousands of people showed up. The coverage of January 6 constantly ignores that detail. This was one of the biggest protests in DC in decades. It wasn't just some small cabal of Trump foot soldiers or whatever nonsense they're trying to convince people.
But they had a fire extinguisher.
A fully automatic one with the extended mag.
And the thingy that goes up.
Lastly, it was a DRAFT that was never sent. How hyperbolic this show trial is.
Cheney is now pushing witness tampering as well despite this not being a criminal trial according to them.
Don't forget "It'll be wild". Obviously, a call for insurrection (Or an invite to Spring Break at Panama City or Daytona).
Or a microarmor wargaming group putting on a recreation of Sidi Rezegh
And a Tweet that has no criminal action in it since it is perfectly legal to march on DC. If this is all they have then they have nothing
And this from a lopsided partisan committee with Hollywood producers.
Next term's GOP committee hearings could be pure gold, Hunter and Pop especially. But I have my doubts they will follow through.
"Inflation just hit its highest point in 40 years."
HAPERINFLATION!!!!!!!
#TemporarilyFillingInForButtplug
One encouraging note: Costco is refusing to raise the price of its iconic hot dogs.
All the proof you need that inflation is a myth.
#HotDogIndex
Yeah, but do they sell spittin tobaccy?
Only in 25 lb tins.
25 lb drums.
25 lb pouches.
I don't get how that's encouraging when the story admits they're selling those at a loss. What exactly is encouraging-that some businesses might start operating at a loss until the government bails them out?
If you're paying Costco's $60 a year membership fee just for the cheap hot dogs, you'll have to eat an unhealthy amount of hot dogs to break even. If you're also shopping in Costco, they expect to make far more than they lose on the hot dogs from your purchases.
Loss leaders aren't at all uncommon. Some supermarkets have been pricing milk below cost to draw in customers ever since supermarkets were invented. The Alsup's convenience store/gas station chain used to set the price of gasoline 1 cent lower than the nearest competitor to draw in more customers for the food - that isn't losing a lot, but gas stations are so competitive in normal times that if it was possible to drop the price a cent and still make a profit after overhead, they'd all do it.
"According to the consumer price index, prices are up 9.1 percent since this time last year."
Bunch of wingnut.com lies. Only spittin' tobaccy has gotten more expensive. (By 10 cents per pouch.)
#MoreButtplugInsights
Dow is down 600 points.
Will mr Koch have enough to eat next week?
"Dow is down 600 points."
Awwwwwwwwww too bad. Middle class families might see a drop in their net worths. 🙁
But Koch / Reason libertarianism isn't concerned with the middle class. We care about our benefactor Charles Koch, who is already up almost $7 billion in 2022, on top of the billions he earned in 2021. IOW Biden has delivered precisely the economy Reason staffers voted for.
#AllAccordingToPlan
Wait, wait....Matzos is up 20%. If you're ignoring that OBL, is there a whiff of anti-semitism there, or is this best thought of as just desserts for white supremacists? What is a progressive to think?! 🙂
Fuentes is believed to be in the U.S. illegally, which is now likely to become the main focus of the conservative response to the story.
Just fuck off, Rico. Seriously.
From yesterday:
https://reason.com/2022/07/13/the-left-and-right-are-living-in-different-realities/?comments=true#comment-9597100
"Ohio man" - ok, I guess that's true? Uncertain though, because he's an illegal immigrant.
Collectivistjeff thinks he's got a gotcha.
Collectivistjeff isn't bright.
The really sick thing is how much leftists/journalists celebrated the fact that a 10 year old girl really was raped and impregnated.
And yet the entire story they initially pushed is still wrong since she could have gotten the abortion in Ohio still.
And before that they were celebrating the Dr. Who helped dispose of the evidence.
Republicans (will probably) pounce!
The "conservative media" have two talking points: Illegal immigrant AND the fact that the Ohio law wouldn't have prohibited her abortion.
Yeah, but leftist media is going to ignore the latter so they can pretend they got this one right.
Let's see. The original (D) narrative: A ten year old girl got raped (a terrible thing) and had to travel out of state for an abortion (a devastating, civilization-ending, evil incarnate thing).
Now the true story seems to be that a ten year old girl got raped by an illegal alien, who is possibly her relative, a doctor (and presumably other people) declined to report the rape, and the abortion was probably available locally.
So let's refocus the narrative on how conservatives will fixate on the illegal alien.
They already dropped the J4 shooter from the news after his antifa leanings showed up.
Who?
Fuentes is believed to be in the U.S. illegally, which is now likely to become the main focus of the conservative response to the story.
The Dems can't catch a break.
All the pouncing
I lol'd
Have haunches ever been reared back on to this degree? This might be the Meta Pounce
Could you blame conservatives for using progressive "logic"?
1. A gun (illegal alien) did a terrible thing.
2. All guns (illegal aliens) are dangerous and evil.
3. Get rid of all guns (illegal aliens)!
Except being an illegal alien is not a constitutional right.
Says who?
Ummmm .... RKBA is not a constitutional right. It is a human right, a natural right, protected by the Constitution.
And immigration control is nowhere in the Constitution. Aren't libertarians supposed to believe in a government limited to enumerated powers?
Go fight it in court. The precedent for federal immigration has been seen since the constitution was written.
http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/immigrationlaw/chapter2.html
Do you support a government of limited enumerated powers, or do you not?
His point and yours are not mutually exclusive. You can advocate both legal immigration and limited government.
I do, except the link actually states where the powers came from and the founders were apparently in agreement with that interpretation since, as I stated, it has been the precedent since the constitution was written.
I mean, i'm all in favor of extremely loose immigration laws but.. comparing the issue of 'illegal aliens' to 'guns' is fucking retarded and one big reason is that the constitution, (yes it is written by and enforced by big guv statists ) does not recognize the right to freely cross into the territory of the USA, whereas it does recognize the citizens' right to keep adn bear arms, both implicitly and explicitly in the 2nd amendment.
Show me where the Constitution recognizes the right to marriage, or living indoors.
Next show me where it authorizes the government to control immigration. Do you support a government of limited enumerated powers? Or only when it suits your goals?
You misunderstand the constitution then.
It implicitly recognizes ALL your rights by virtue of the fact it is only providing for limited and enumerated powers of the government.
Not only that, it further goes on to EXPLICITLY enumerate some of your rights that are extra important and should not be overlooked, such as free speech, keep and bear arms, right to be secure in your person etc.
Then it goes even FURTHER and add not one but TWO explicit amendments, the 9th and the 10th, that reiterate the fact that any thing any one can think of as a right is protected and the governmetn cannot infringe them except with the powers and scope explicitly listed here in this consitution.
So yes, the right to marriage and living indoors is definitely protected by the consitution. So is the right to just about everything they have made illegal today! The vast majority of the federal governments' reach and operation is unconstitutional in my opinion.
The rights of foreigners to cross over the border willy-nilly is not protected by what i just described. It is a quite different issue and you know it..
Inflation just hit its highest point in 40 years.
Putin's been working on this one for a while.
Just like gas companies and the price of gas, this is caused by those greedy inflation companies.
Talk about pouncing. Inflation stocks are the latest meme stock
Gas price increases were largely responsible for the trend.
If only people would buy electric, the cheap fucks.
Fucking poors, ruining the economy for the rest of us.
Stop buying gas, just take Uber.
I'm surprised the electric car industry hasn't pounced
"Fuentes is believed to be in the U.S. illegally, which is now likely to become the main focus of the conservative response to the story."
So no concerns that the doctor has now, repeatedly, not reported an underage pregnancy to authorities? License should be revoked over her protecting of pedo rapists.
100%
But they're too busy doing an endzone dance that the story is partially true to think about such things.
Leftists are literally cancer.
If we could just have the kid quietly have an abortion that would fix everything wrong here. No harm, no foul. Now some poor migrant's life is ruined.
Geez, can't you think like a good social progressive?
Can't wait for the Fiona article.
Please find one example of a social progressive, or anyone for that matter, making the argument you just made. Think you’ll be looking for a a long time.
Most pregnancies at that age are family rapes. Fucking Rs think that family consent in those situations is what really matters. Further, the rape WAS reported. To the local police. It is only the state police and AG who spread the narrative that it didn't get reported until they get the paperwork, pass it around their office, and figure out a way to include that in their political narrative .
Rs re quickly going to understand the blowback to them re this issue
Fucking Rs think that family consent in those situations is what really matters.
Cite? Because it is leftists like jeff implying family consent matters for trans surgeries and kid porn books.
Poor, psychotic, cowardly jfree.
"Most pregnancies at that age are family rapes. Fucking Rs think that family consent in those situations is what really matters."
I'd LOVE to see the evidence to bolster this claim.
And, yes, parental notification is vital for things involving their children. Deal with it.
"Further, the rape WAS reported. To the local police. It is only the state police and AG who spread the narrative that it didn't get reported until they get the paperwork, pass it around their office, and figure out a way to include that in their political narrative ."
Zero proof of that, either. When asked about that specifically, the doctor refused to answer. And has a history of not reporting underage abortions.
"Rs re quickly going to understand the blowback to them re this issue"
By morons who are incapable of thought or by the public who actually is on the side of the pro-life side of the argument on restrictions?
You're right. The rape was not reported. Instead, the authorities just rounded up the usual suspects on their Friday night roundup. Bludgeoned an illegal into confessing to a rape the authorities didn't know about. And then searched social media for someone who claimed they were raped around then. And then bludgeoned everyone into making sure all the narratives could work. Then arrested the suspect.
Your knowledge of how things really happen is impeccable
Fucking delusional.
Way to pounce +1
"Fucking Rs think that family consent in those situations is what really matters."
You probably should have confabbed with your good pal chemjeff before posting that hot take. Parental consent was his excuse for castrating kids.
Jeeze dude, take your meds.
I'm just pissed that those dastardly conservatives are focused on finding the rapist instead of dealing with the real villain here: the dead baby.
In a nutshell, yeah.
You don't know whether to laugh or cry at it all anymore.
Please find one example of anyone making the argument you just made. Think you’ll be looking for a a long time.
"Eat the rich—literally? Popsicles shaped like the heads of billionaires hit New York City."
LOL
I suspect the people who think they're "drinking billionaire tears" by eating those are the same people who voted for Biden like billionaires wanted them to.
#OBLsFirstLaw
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R–Colo.) is not a huge fan of separating church and state.
Good job on completely not understanding the point she is making in the clip you linked to. You're on fire today, Rico.
It is odd how many prog blue checkers they cite supportively here.
It's almost like their twitter feeds don't have any alternative voices or something.
Not just supportively, but un-critically. But, Reason Editors are NOT far left progressives. No sir.
You'd think that a libertarian magazine claiming no partisan affinities would cite prominent figures on the right like Shapiro once in a while. Instead they use neocons and misrepresent right-wing randos to represent the right whom they so clearly loathe
I haven't followed this issue about 1/6, but can someone tell me exactly what Trump said or did that was wrong?
I see things like "March to the capital" like that is bad, but it's not. There's nothing wrong with telling people to march to the capital. Did trump say something about break in and sit in Nancy's chair?
He. Threw. His. Lunch.
Ketchup WAS DRIPPING!
How can people not see the metaphor?! THE KETCHUP WAS BLOOD! DON'T YOU GET IT?!
The left/establishment blatantly stole the election, and the left/establishment feels compelled to paint noticing that as the gravest threat to democracy imaginable.
Thou shalt not point out the current regime's illegitimacy.
Further, unlike the directed blmantifa months of political terrorism, the target of protest was where it should be: at the gathering of government officials. Can't have that!
And despite hundreds of thousands of protestors in the city, all damage was limited to the one building (and that might or might not have been instigated by the feds).
I remember when his speech/remarks to the crowd were considered dangerous and that he incited the riot.
Then I went and read the remarks and they are so tame and mild that I thought maybe I found the wrong text.
The media lies about Trump every single time, and blatantly. It's got to the point where if I see any news about Trump I assume it's false, and likely the opposite.
lately any news from the left about the right is just projection so we don't see that they are the ones actually doing it.
Confession via projection
“I haven’t followed this issue about 1/6” followed by making arguments that Trump is innocent of incitement, all of which refer to knowing things about the issue of 1/6. Dictionary definition of disingenuous.
Just to be clear, a non-disingenuous statement on your part would have been something like: “From everything I have learned about the events of 1/6, I don’t agree that Trump did anything wrong.”
I would even agree with you if you had said, “… I don’t see that Trump did anything illegal.”
I do think he did wrong or bad things.
You have an immature way of reasoning.
And you failed to answer my question.
Costco is refusing to raise the price of its iconic hot dogs.
They may have to cheapen them up with more rat meat and shoe parts.
I don't want to know what Gray's Papaya was doing then.
Or bugs. Don't be fooled by the "all beef" label. If bees can be fish, then maggots swarming a cow carcass can be beef.
Nice pounce
Look up "pink slime". That's beef. Cow lips and anuses are beef. I don't know how much skin and hooves you can grind into the mix before it's no longer considered beef. Then the hot dogs are processed with so many chemicals that you can't taste what they were made of.
Oh hell. That has been happening in regular inflation reporting for decades. Consumer trading down from steak to burger and chicken is deemed mere consumer preference and never questioned as to what is really going on
You are CLUELESS as to how the economy works. With inflation, either Costco is going to have to raise the prices, or find cheaper parts that will inevitably reduce the quality of their products. This is what exactly happened in the Soviet Union. What part of that do you not understand?
And you are clueless about how that process is MEASURED for inflation statistics.
Has nothing to do with commies in the woodwork.
Or do like cereal companies and other makers of packaged foods, and make the hot dog smaller without changing the price.
I don't know if they're iconic anyway. If you see someone walking around making an icon of a hot dog then I submit that you're just seeing a homeless person in crisis.
I figured their pizza (which sucks, too) was more popular than their hot dogs.
Tell me you’ve never had the Costco hot dog special without telling me you’ve never had the Costco hot dog special.
Good pounce. I love those things. I just wish they would give a bigger drink cup if you buy two, rather than two cups
Also they should sex up the chicken bake with jalapeños.
"New testimony at the January 6 committee hearings revealed that former President Donald Trump wrote, but did not send, a draft tweet that urged his supporters to march to the Capitol. "Please arrive early, massive crowds expected," he wrote. "March to the Capitol after. Stop the steal!""
I assume, in some reality, this is relevant or even newsworthy.
"Somebody wrote something but did not send it to anybody" sounds like specifically NOT inciting anything.
What kind of Fascist are you?
The meanest tweet is the unsent tweet.
Please arrive early, massive crowds expected
The horror. I bet he even almost advised them to bundle up because it's cold and to drive safely.
I heard he almost tweeted to car pool because of limited parking, the monster.
Think of how many therapists incite violence on a daily basis when they tell their patients to write a letter to someone, but not send it.
If a tweet falls in the forest but there’s no one there to hear it, does it make a sound?
No, but it's still insurrection.
It's impossible to tell whether that was sarcasm or serious.
There's a lot going on right now but the idea we're going to be able to click a switch, bring down the cost of gasoline, is not likely in the near term.
To the companies running gas stations and setting those prices at the pump… Bring down the prices you are charging at the pump to reflect the cost you are paying for the product.
Remember that Biden said the first one before he takes credit for lowering gas prices single-handedly by saying the second.
Half the price at my local pump is state and federal taxes.
Not true
The United States federal excise tax on gasoline is 18.4 cents per gallon and 24.4 cents per gallon for diesel fuel.[1][2] The federal tax was last raised October 1, 1993 and is not indexed to inflation, which increased 93% from 1993 until 2022. On average, as of April 2019, state and local taxes and fees add 34.24 cents to gasoline and 35.89 cents to diesel, for a total US volume-weighted average fuel tax of 52.64 cents per gallon for gas and 60.29 cents per gallon for diesel.[3]
Yea, there's no state that has anything close to a $2.50/gallon gas tax. There aren't any that are even $1/gallon.
This is just brandybuck being his usual ignorant, idiotic, disingenuous self.
But the stuff in his head feels true.
They’re not sending their brightest.
Your pouncing is very good today. +2
New testimony at the January 6 committee hearings revealed-
Grooooooooan.
Hi ENB the story is still a lie as the girl did not have to travel to Indiana. The cunt Dr still made it up, and you still bought it.
Second note why do you think child rape is wrong in this case but are okay with it when Scott promotes it?
What makes you think she thinks child rape is wrong in this case. What she's making a big deal out of is that the girl had (no she didn't) to travel to another state to get an abortion.
More likely the family wanted the abortion to happen as far away from home as possible so no one they knew would find out about it.
Then the abortion provider blabbed in an effort to make it about Dobbs.
Exactly.
The OHIO doctor believed that the OHIO trigger law has no exceptions for rape or incest. The OHIO doctor is the one facing felony charges if they start asking legal questions about abortion and then it happen. The OHIO trigger law was quite clear to everyone - there are no exceptions for rape or incest and even 'life of mother' (which no one says was the case here) must be agreed on by separate unrelated doctors and performed in an ER.
Only the Ohio AG waves his hands and asserts without evidence - to a completely political media source - that 'something could have been done' - after asserting to those same sources for a couple of weeks that nothing could be done and that therefore the kid must have been lying.
And you still are trying to sell that shit. Shame on you
Dr Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, said she had received a call
The Dr who made up the story was in indi
So you are saying that the doctor in Indiana got a prank phone from some doctor in India? Or did she make it all up until it was proven that she didn't make it up?
You Mises assholes are completely shameless about reality. Any lie is OK as long as it serves an R narrative.
Maybe not lie about the actual story, JFart, and you won't sound like a completely unhinged, abortion-until-the-umbilical-cord-is-cut supporting lunatic.
"So you are saying that the doctor in Indiana got a prank phone from some doctor in India?"
No he didn't. Are you retarded?
It's like they can't even read the parts that inconvenience the narrative.
Robby did the roundup today. ENB was unable as twitter was down this morning.
Looks like Robby was eating Blue Check kibble this morning too.
And pounced, to be sure, at the chance to do the roundup
...former President Donald Trump wrote, but did not send, a draft tweet that urged his supporters to march to the Capitol. "Please arrive early, massive crowds expected," he wrote.
Odd not even days are when protesting is considered patriotic.
What ever happened to #RESIST?
Resisting the Resistance is Insurrection.
"Odd not even days are when protesting is considered patriotic."
And only in designated areas like the streets and retail stores. Don't you dare take your issues to the people responsible.
And only when you're protesting the correct causes.
...Uvalde's mayor criticized the local media outlet for publishing it.
If only he had cops brave enough to go after the releasers.
They're standing around waiting for the SWAT team.
Twitter is suing Elon Musk for backing out of his deal to acquire the company.
Its board and employees were all set to move to Canada.
From You'll never take us alive! to We'll make sure you take us if it's the last thing we do!. Impressive work, Mr. Musk.
Gotta be fun being him.
Yeah. This whole takeover had been a giant troll it looks like.
I'm not sure. He may be just outmaneuvering them for a better price. We'll see.
"Twitter sues Elon to FORCE him to buy them" was not on my 2022 bingo card that's for sure.
New Zealand is bringing back COVID-19 restrictions.
Bound to work this time.
Like communism.
Once a penal colony always a penal colony.
The perverts.
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R–Colo.) is not a huge fan of separating church and state.
Congress is not really a fan of separating state and much... except responsibility.
Responsibility is white supremacy patriarchy privilege. Or something.
"Fuentes is believed to be in the U.S. illegally, which is now likely to become the main focus of the conservative response to the story."
Even if this part turns out to be true, we cannot for one minute let it get in the way of our benefactor Charles Koch's demand for unlimited, unrestricted immigration.
For every child rapist we import, we probably import thousands of people who don't rape children and instead just clean Mr. Koch's toilets for 15 cents an hour. I'll take that ratio any day!
#InDefenseOfBillionaires
#CheapLaborAboveAll
Gotta break a few hymens for clean toilets.
Can't clean a toilet without inseminating a few eggs.
Wow! Koch sure is incontinent.
Popsicles shaped like the heads of billionaires hit New York City.
I certainly hope they make a lot of money off their product.
What if they become billionaires?
In other news, Hasbro will put your head on a GI Joe for $60.
Like, your actual head?
My head, my choice
I already look just like Duke.
Nice. People tell me I look like UNC Chapel Hill.
I suppose if someone made Eat the Poor popsicles it would be “punching down”, and therefore all wrong.
Those damn libtards are at it again. Going to the houses of SCOTUS judges late at night, carrying a gun, shouting obscenities at them and threatening to kill them. They really are a dangerous threat to the Republic.
https://archive.ph/3pzG6
LOL
Great work jeff! This is WAY worse than the Kavanaugh thing!
I can’t believe anyone would ever accuse Mr Radical-Individualist of being an unhinged lefty spending his days searching for Both Sides material and desperately elevating every false equivalence he can muster
A progressive senetor said kids should be put in prison for misgendering people, and. A republican that ran for dog catcher said that gays should get married. Both sides!
Jeff was even trying to defend senator attacks on pregnancy centers even with Warren this week asking them to be completely shut down.
You know, it is possible to loathe Team Red without being an unhinged lefty.
It's possible for someone else, not you.
lol you're just upset that there is someone who can present libertarian ideas without being immersed in the right-wing sewer
The self delusion is amazing.
Oh! NAMBLA has a Libertarian wing?
No. It is your rabid defense of everything left from CRT, grooming, globalism, ruling by elites, etc.
Your unhinged gotchas you probably get from DailyKos are just icing.
His "gotcha" material (which is hilariously bad) is always the same stuff being talked about on DailyBeast, Huffpo, Salon, and TheView.
But somehow he thinks shouting them here, among people who know what those sources do, is going to be a true 'gotcha' and he isnt just going to get laughed at and easily picked apart.
A lot of people with poor judgement and critical thinking also have zero insight
What does your link have anything to do with “Team Red”, you unhinged simpleton?
But you are an unhinged lefty so the proposition is moot.
but you sure as hell havent found out how to yet junior
It has been amusing watching him break and finally take his mask off. Even though he was obviously a lefty the entire time he has been here.
Wow. Gotcha indeed. I can’t believe the Republicans encouraged this guy to travel the block and a half to do this. Even worse that Kabanaugh voted to deny her protection, and worse yet the local DA lets him continue when he has clearly broken the law
I'll note that the guy is being punished and I do not see conservatives applauding the guy or continuing the idiocy.
Lefty Jeffy isn’t very good at gotchas.
Lefty Jeffy is very good at lying though.
This is getting sad, Lefty Jeffy.
Skilled pounce, man. Skilled
"New testimony at the January 6 committee hearings revealed that former President Donald Trump wrote, but did not send, a draft tweet that urged his supporters to march to the Capitol. "Please arrive early, massive crowds expected," he wrote. "March to the Capitol after. Stop the steal!""
Ladies and gentlemen, we got him.
Another bombshell.
We've reached the tipping point.
The walls are closing in.
It's the beginning of the end.
Not worse than Watergate?
It's not the beginning of the end, it's only the end of the beginning.
This is it. This is the lynchpin. The walls are closing in.
Tipping point!!!
#BidenBoom update!
In 2022 Democrats have raised the minimum wage by: $0.00 / hour
In 2022 Reason.com benefactor Charles Koch's net worth has increased by: $6.81 billion
#VoteDemocratToHelpCharlesKoch
"Fuentes is believed to be in the U.S. illegally, which is now likely to become the main focus of the conservative response to the story."
Stop deflecting.
The rape and pregnancy are unfortunately confirmed, but that still doesn't explain why the child was taken to Indiana when she would have been able to get an abortion under Ohio's law. Ohio has an exception not just for life, but for health as well, so there's no reason why the child had to go to Indiana.
By shifting focus to what you think conservatives are going to focus on, you're ignoring what they're ACTUALLY focused on- that this story still misrepresents Ohio's law, and that does a huge disservice to women in Ohio.
The Left will happily kill people to protect their narrative.
The story also says he's been in the US for 7 years. So, he just randomly decided to rape a 10 year old girl this June, and has never raped or assaulted anyone other children during those 7 years?
People don't just randomly decide to rape children. Chances are, he's been raping- or at least molesting- children long before this. People don't just wake up and decide they're violent pedophiles on a random Tuesday morning.
I dunno.
"Hmm, do I want to open a food truck...OR do I want to rape underage kids" seems to be the fundamental debate illegals must have.
I'm saying, if he's a pedo, he's always been a pedo. There are probably other child victims out there.
but those victims weren't useful to the dems at that time, because highlighting them at that time would also put a spotlight on an illegal pedo rapist.
But now illegal and pedo are << ROE!!! So they are cool with taking off the mask and saying such
But Trump said immigrants were murderers and rapists, so, of course, no immigrant can be a murderer or rapist.
you can't go after illegals for their crimes its racist. England has a huge problem with rape gangs not being prosecuted for racist reasons. Of course in America defenders are punished while criminals are set free
This story is a bloody shirt for the pro aborts. They do not care much about the crime committed against a child.
And what's the legal status of the parents of the child? Is this a large community of illegal aliens? Because if it is, he's probably been raping with impunity for a while now, because illegal immigrants don't go to the police.
THIS IS WHY ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS BAD, ELIZABETH. It creates an underclass of shadow people who fear deportation, and are easily victimized by predators.
That's why we need to fling open the doors and allow everyone in who wants to come. A massive underclass is much better than a smaller, shadow underclass to spur the proletarian revolt. How else are we supposed to get to communist utopia?
Okay then. Amnesty it is. That way they won't be an underclass of shadow people who won't go to the police for fear of being deported, they'll have the same legal rights and remedies as everyone else.
I don't necessarily disagree with amnesty in certain cases, and under specific circumstances.
I do given that we did so in 1986 and nothing got any better. Secure the border and we can then discuss other options.
This I agree with. Secure the border, and then discuss the status of people already here.
"First get rid of the illegal heroin, then we can talk about legalizing pot."
When would the border ever be "secure" in your view? What would have to happen?
Not having hundreds of thousands entering illegally every year would be a solid start.
Stop being an idiot Jeff. No matter what anyone says in answer to that question, you are going to make some other absurb statement.
You're not smart or clever. That's okay. Some people just aren't. You should learn to love yourself as you are and stop trying to be trans smart.
No matter what anyone says in answer to that question, you are going to make some other absurb statement.
In other words, you can't answer the question because you know the phrase "secure the border" is just a stupid slogan and not a policy with any real meaning, and you will continue to use it as an excuse to avoid doing anything about amnesty or the undocumented workers here, because it is not possible to "secure the border" to your satisfaction in any meaningful or realistic way.
No. I'm saying discussing anything with you is like trying to reason with a toddler. Everything you say is absurd and unreasonable, because you are an absurd and unreasonable person.
Linking illegal immigration and illegal alien status, to heroin and pot is retarded. It's a terrible, dishonest analogy. Elementary school sophistry at its worst.
Cronut is right to call you an idiot.
since you doubled down on your personal attacks, I'm pretty sure I'm right. "Secure the border" is just a slogan to be trotted out whenever the concept of amnesty comes up, so as to make it seem that you are not being the obstinate one refusing to consider it, it's everybody else's fault for not meeting your impossible demand. It's just another way of saying "I'll support amnesty when pigs fly."
He's attacking what you said, Jeffy. And it was absurd.
Stop lying and trying to look like a martyr.
People are just like dime bags.
I still think there is ample space to work on different places of immigration without doing a fucking omnibus. Like, levels of immigration are actually not directly connected to the process of immigrating if we're willing to say no to people. We could do so much to simplify the process and make it more clear and then talk about numbers and things like that.
I've always been really for adding almost arbitrary numbers for daily, or super short term workers as well. People working in border areas but residing in Mexico and such. Speed that up and let them cross basically freely. Things like that.
The bordercrossings being such a clusterfuck doesn't help anyone, and isn't even apparently that effective at catching people.
I've always been really for adding almost arbitrary numbers for daily, or super short term workers as well. People working in border areas but residing in Mexico and such. Speed that up and let them cross basically freely. Things like that.
Yes. Absolutely. Do that.
It’s great at causing people to drown in the Rio Grande though.
I don't think amnesty should even be on the table unless the border is secured first. Otherwise, we're just setting ourselves up to do the same thing again in 10-15 years.
Thats what the left. Aka jeff. Wants.
And what's the legal status of the parents of the child? Is this a large community of illegal aliens?
It's there for you to parse Cronut. Fuentes is almost certainly a male relative of the victim. Key features (aside from general background 'Stranger Danger!' statistics Reason quotes ad nauseum):
-No known address means Fuentes wasn't a frustrated cop or a skiddish pastor or sexy teacher or some other authority figure or pillar of the community that people would otherwise (auspiciously) trust their kids with. He shouldn't have had access unless he was otherwise known to the family.
-No known address and getting picked up in the area (assuming he's not a scapegoat) means he's likely got ties to the community. At least, he up and left Guatemala for whatever reason but, despite having committed a rape, didn't leave OH.
-Testing the remains *and siblings*. If he were a random stranger or a teacher or whatever, there would be no reason to test the siblings. The only reason to test the siblings is to rule them out and make his paternity more clear. The only way that works is if her siblings are related to him (and also potential suspects).
-Despite all of the above, multiple rapes (according to confession) and 6 weeks between a rape and the abortion. So, Fuentes didn't just rape her an leaver her in a back alley for someone to find, figure she was fine, and discover a 'bump' 6 weeks later. He was able to rape her and remain present to enforce her silence until the bump became obvious.
It creates an underclass of shadow people who fear deportation, and are easily victimized by predators.
More specific to ENB's sensibilities; for the vast majority of human and even primate species' history males have been the physically dominate gender, sweeping away large swaths of culture enables a return to more primal arrangements. Rule of law vs. rule of men vs. rule of jungle.
I, of course, don't know anything for certain. Maybe Dad was at work and the girl was raped by a brother and Dad is trying to shield him. Regardless, tell the 10 yr. old girl who got raped that her borders are just abstract social constructs or figments of peoples' imagination.
Exactly.
The whole story is revolting. One of the things that stands out to me, as the parent lf girls, is that when girls first start getting their periods, they're not regular. They don't have clockwork 28 day cycles. It's not at all unusual for a girl who just started menstruating to go more than a month between periods. So, unless you took her to the doc for something else, why would you assume she was pregnant? Docs are mandated reporters, so if the doc found the pregnancy, I assume the doc would report it as required. But the mother made the report, not a doctor.
So, two questions. Did a doc not report to child rape as required, which is a huge fucking problem, or did the parents know she was being sexually abused and assume she was pregnant because she was being sexually abused?
Like you, I know nothing for certain. But there's a lot of questions about what the hell lead to a 10 year old girl getting an abortion, and an arrest made three weeks later and only after the story came out?
"but that still doesn't explain why the child was taken to Indiana when she would have been able to get an abortion under Ohio's law."
It was likely done so the family could keep anyone else in their community from finding out.
But then the abortion provider blabbed in and effort to make it about Dobbs.
She's an activist with something like a dozen media appearances in the weeks prior to the story about the girl.
It would also confound law enforcement since the states don't share all reporting.
I'm not entirely convinced this isn't specifically the case. Not because of abortion or Dobbs, but because the victim's relationship to her attacker, and likely her mother, is complicated even without her Dad being an illegal immigrant.
Even assuming no guilt and/or some guilt-obliterating tragic story between the victim and Fuentes, that pretty much means this was deliberately set up to be a hush-hush situation and Dr. Bernard is only slightly less unscrupulous than your average coyote and threw them under the bus.
Even that's kind of shifting the blame. Should Ohio have been able to have their law? Is this a state issue or not? I know Reason is taking a purely consequentialist stance now, and believes that children have limited to no value, but don't fall into their argumentation.
Colorado will almost certainly continue to allow late-term abortions as well. I find this to be despicable but it is a question for their state to make those rules.
Good point. States have a right to make whatever laws they want about abortion.
Maybe Ohio will change it's law and add a rape and incest exception. I don't know. It's not an absurd stance for them to not include one though. It's consistent with the idea that the baby is a human with rights as well. But maybe Ohio doesn't actually want that. Maybe they'll give exceptions for extreme cases like this one (and it is an extreme case, as much abortion discussion loves to focus on the extremes).
The voters of Ohio can argue over this and they'll slowly arrive at some position that pisses everyone off, but not enough to fight about it more. Same story everywhere. It will probably arrive even sooner due to the fact that people will just be able to go over a state to get an abortion still.
As we've seen elsewhere, there's nothing that stops a DA or AG from simply not prosecuting, throwing a case, or pleading out a sweetheart deal. Or even a Governor from stooping down and granting executive clemency. It's all a bit harder since the victim was transported across state lines but, still, pretty sure your local DA, AG, or Governor doesn't want to see pictures of a 10 yr. old girl in handcuffs or crying on behalf of the Dr. that helped her on the cover of his local newspaper. Making them (the AG and LEOs) look like asshats by blabbing the story to the papers first and LEOs second doesn't help things at all.
I know Reason is taking a purely consequentialist stance now, and believes that children have limited to no value, but don't fall into their argumentation.
Yeah, my line of thinking is/was like this: Anyone who thinks the worst part of this little girls' ordeal was the 2 hr. trip from OH to IN needs to be raped a couple times by one of their male relatives and giving them the option of getting immediate treatment rather than waiting 6 weeks would be relatively merciful.
"Federal health officials hope that some Americans who remain unvaccinated—about 22 percent of all people in the U.S.—will be more comfortable opting for the Novavax vaccine."
Not me. Even if this new vaccine actually is as safe and effective as they claimed the various bad vaccines would be, I'd still be in more danger from a car accident on the way to the vaccination site than I would from COVID-19.
So, you are saying you wish for a car accident vaccine, and common sense lock-down policies to prevent car accidents? The NIH and CDC will get right on it!
Study shows over prescription of Paxlovoid in the young and those not at risk is causing the Covid virus to mutate more quickly.
https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/study-finds-covid-already-mutating-around-paxlovid-fda-circumvents
for decades Scientist have been warning us about over medicating and over sterilizing since whatever you are trying to eliminate will just get stronger but then covid comes along and boom lets ignore all this past science and go way overboard to prove we are doing something.
Remember, these are the peanut-phobia people.
Vaccination is different from medicating or sterilizing.
Judge orders immediate discovery for social media companies and their interactions with politicians.
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/judge-orders-discovery-phase-social-media-collusion-lawsuit-against
If the judge informed himself by reading Reason he'd know that these are Private Companies and are free to censor whatever Biden tells them to censor.
Well, you can read the original complaint here.
https://dashboard.aflds.dev/uploads/2_The_State_of_Missouri_etc_The_State_of_Louisiana_etc_v_Biden_etc_et_al_22_cv_01213_Complaint_5_5_2022_WDLA_5c0b307fcc.pdf
The entire brief is really just a reiteration of the same tired argument that the bloviations of a Senator are equivalent to a direct threat that impermissibly violates the Constitution. This is just absurd.
So if a Senator says, "I think Facebook should do more to censor misinformation", that is equivalent to the Senator directly threatening Facebook to censor on behalf of the government? Really? What about the Senator's freedom of speech here? Is he not allowed to state his opinion on a matter and not have it construed as some type of ominous threat?
If we follow this legal theory to its logical conclusion, it would mean that it would be unconstitutional for any Senator to criticize any business at all.
The entire brief is really just a reiteration of the same tired argument that the bloviations of a Senator are equivalent to a direct threat that impermissibly violates the Constitution. This is just absurd.
It is not absurd. It's the equivalent of "nice store you got there would be a real shame if Mario and Paulie burned it down."
Only in this case the threat is coming from the biggest gang there is. it's definitely a threat of government action if you dont mollify the Senator. Only a blinded partisan could be able to miss that.
Thought experiement: Flip the principals. Right wing website that bans all pro-choice and pro-union talk etc and Trump sends them a threatening letter. I know you can do it!
It is not absurd. It's the equivalent of "nice store you got there would be a real shame if Mario and Paulie burned it down."
OR, it is the equivalent of expressing an opinion of "I think Facebook should do more to censor misinformation" without any threat implied at all.
Thought experiement: Flip the principals. Right wing website that bans all pro-choice and pro-union talk etc and Trump sends them a threatening letter. I know you can do it!
It's still not unconstitutional because a "threatening letter" is not the same as a formal government action.
Thought experiment for you: Suppose you are Liz Warren and you want Facebook to crack down on misinformation online. Based on your standard, what public comment could you make, in any context, that would criticize Facebook or urge them to censor misinformation in some way, that would NOT be an unconstitutional threat?
You understand there is a long history of government coercion cases that exist right? So you don't have to prove your ignorance here.
You didnt read the brief.
I read the brief. There is absolutely nothing in that brief that constitutes the government formally ordering or directing any private company to censor anything.
The entire thing is just bitching about Section 230, and a compilation of senators bloviating about social media.
"There is absolutely nothing in that brief that constitutes the government formally ordering"
Note how Lying Jeffy snuck "formally" in there, despite Woodchipper's actual point being that this breaks down to "nice store you got there would be a real shame if Mario and Paulie burned it down."
He thinks he's so tricky.
He’s a dishonest weasel.
There you go again...pouncing
Again, it doesn't require formal ordering from the government to trigger 1A conditions on a business.
Again, stop arguing from ignorance. Prof Volokh has quite a few panels he has posted regarding this.
You did not read the brief. Because it explains cases that show this.
Any involvement in commerce is a violation of the constitution and senators should keep their fucking mouths shut about the businesses of the free citizens of the USA.
So that's where I stand. And yes, any Senator commenting on the business practices of any business is a fucking threat of federal power being used against it.
and senators should keep their fucking mouths shut about the businesses of the free citizens of the USA.
So, Senators don't have free speech rights?
Sure do. But what they're doing here is a beyond obvious first amendment violation.
"So if a Senator says, "I think Facebook should do more to censor misinformation", that is equivalent to the Senator directly threatening Facebook to censor on behalf of the government?"
So if Trump's, "Arrive early. Huge crowds expected" is a call to violent insurrection, that Senator could easily be construed as asking for censorship on behalf of the government.
Totes different!
It's not a call to violent insurrection.
Which words specifically?
Neither were the Trump remarks. But if you think they were, then your hypothetical situation of a senator calling for a company to censor absolutely is a threat to said company. Marching towards a building is not an insurrection.
"So if a Senator says, "I think Facebook should do more to censor misinformation","
That's just what the Senator said publicly.
"that is equivalent to the Senator directly threatening Facebook to censor on behalf of the government?"
We have no idea what the Senator may have said to Facebook privately. That there should be discovery on this issue is not absurd.
So, a fishing expedition?
So you ignored all the evidence of the politicians stating their offices were working directly with the businesses?
So you didn't read the brief. You lied from the outset.
I don’t call him Lying Jeffy for nothing.
The entire brief is really just a reiteration of the same tired argument that the bloviations of a Senator are equivalent to a direct threat that impermissibly violates the Constitution. This is just absurd.
"In my world, the Judicial system operates by attorneys holding up their filing papers and saying, 'See?' before the accused is sentenced for their alleged crime. Sure, we convict a lot of people with zero evidence but justice is really, really swift!" - chemjeff radical individualist
In my world, I get to express opinions on the merits (or lack thereof) of any case that I wish without pretending that my opinion alone should constitute the entirety of due process that either litigant in the case should receive.
In the real world the judge knows the laws and actually reads the brief instead of lying about reading it and pontificating on shit he doesn't know about.
Oh huh. So what you're saying is, entirely without regard for the fact that you may find it absurd, the claimants and the accused are owed due process? Did you hear that from somebody or did you just come up with it yourself?
Go ahead. Tell me I'm being absurd and acting in bad faith.
And if it was Josh Hawley, you’d be up in arms about Authortariansm
No. It is a legal argument well versed in historical precedence that even Prof Volokh has discussed.
Just because you're an idiot doesn't make it wrong.
DA Gascon ends the notification requirements in California to alert victims when their attackers are given parole hearings or may be released.
https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2022/07/14/update-reassigned-lifer-unit-dda-julianne-walker-debunks-gascons-lies-about-the-units-closure-n594495
how the f can he do that legally considering its a law. doesn't that make the DA a criminal
A criminal or a progressive hero?
Yes.
Anti-vaxxers still won't like it. Telling you that they didn't want mRNA vaccines was just a lie. They don't want any vaccines. Remember, the whole entire anti-vaxx movement started with nutters convinced ordinary traditional vaccines were bad. So anti-vaxxers are opposed to vaccines in general, all vaccines.
Think I'm wrong? Prove me wrong by getting vaccinated!
Your ability to know, precisely, what anybody you disagree with REALLY thinks is impressive.
I’m just glad he didn’t call us all racist again.
My body, something, something.
That only works when you're killing someone else.
LOL
This scared little leftist simp is still pimping vaccines, reality be damned!
What is it like to wake up every day and know the world would be better without you in it?
That is over-shadowed by waking up every day knowing that people will not do what their betters have told them to do, and that the safe, happy utopia is again delayed.
Only leftists get vaccines. True libertarians reject stupid shit like science and facts.
On the contrary, what you said wasn't scientific or factual. Did you forget that big spike that happened months ago? You are disingenuous.
Mises Caucus campaigned on "no shutdowns", but they also seem chock full of anti-vaxxers. There's one thing to disagree with government economic shutdowns and mandates and shit, but quite another to abandon science for ideological groupthink.
"Being anti-mandates is being anti-vaccine"
Are you pro-mandates, Brandybuck? Do you think people should lose their jobs and travel privileges if they refuse the jab?
They literally changed the definition of anti-vaxxer to include people who are against mandates. But the vast vast vast vast majority of 'anti-vaxxers' are just anti-mandate.
Are we back to claiming people that don't want the Covid vax are the same as people that don't want any vaccines whatsoever? I'm tired of reruns.
Just noting that he Venn diagram between Anti-Vaxx and and Anti-Covid-Vaxx resembles a circle.
Just noting that he Venn diagram between Anti-Vaxx and and Anti-Covid-Vaxx resembles a circle.
Perhaps in the Land of Make-Believe, but not reality.
And where are you getting your data for that? Twitter? CNN?
Look ML, if we just had open-access medical records, vaccine passports, and daily testing, Brandybuck wouldn't be forced to pull data out of his own ass in order to parse and impugn the anti-vaxxers from the anti-COVID-vaxxers. It's not his fault those anti-vaxx retards can't see the enlightened path he's trying to lead us all down and rejecting him.
He's such a misunderstood angel.
So we ARE back to claiming people that don't want the Covid vax are the same as people that don't want any vaccines. Good to know. Carry on.
Great pounce. Truly
I’m not going to get it because I don’t need it. I’m not “anti-vax”, I’m “anti-getting any medical treatment that’s not needed”. Now go take some dramamine and spin around in a circle until you fall over.
I'm opposed to my government throwing money at problems in a panic. Doesn't matter whether it's a vaccine to prevent a pandemic or a bank that's too big to fail or an automaker that overleveraged itself or a shit-ton of poor people who ate their way into diabetes and heart disease and can't insure their way out. It's a fantastic way to abjectly and permanently warp people's perceptions and produce abjectly terrible solutions and firmament them for all of time.
In addition to my childhood vaccines, my HepB and TDAP are up to date, which most adults can't say. I'll get the shingles vaccine in a few years as I fall into the recommended demographic. I'll almost certainly never get a COVID nor an HPV vaccine, and probably never on influenza. I'm undecided, but leaning towards, probably for Pneumonia vaccine(s).
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R–Colo.) is not a huge fan of separating church and state.
Not sure where you got this from the linked tweet. She is calling out the dems hypocrisy, most likely in regards to the football prayer ruling.
Motivated reasoning and partisan ideology?
He saw a Tweet about it and repeated it.
I'm a clinical trial volunteer (aka "guinea pig") for the Novavax vaccine.
One reason THE AUTHORITAHS are hopeful that it will encourage more vaccinations is that it is not (like Pfizer/Moderna) a "messenger RNA" vaccine. It's an older technology, "protein subunit," used in several other vaccines. So people who are skeptical of mRNA's possible side effects might be interested in this one.
Anecdotally, I think it works. There are five people in my household. Recently, four of them fell ill and tested positive for COVID-19. Despite spending the entire week surrounded by COVID-19-positive people in a not terribly large dwelling, I never got sick and never tested positive, unlike the one un-vaccinated person and the three Pfizer-vaxxed-and-boosted people.
Good for you for contributing to medical science.
I haven't gotten sick in over 2 years.
That's because you never leave your mom's basement.
I think you might want to worry more about him spending time in your wife's 'basement.'
That's Nardz, not Jeff, you're replying to.
Homeless people really shouldn’t call out people for where they live.
Pounced!! +3
The issue they will have is that they lied, frequently, about the prior vaccines. Even if this one is pure as the wind-driven snow --- so many lies about the other ones have been told ("The vaccinated cannot transmit it", for example)...it is going to be a challenge to trust their word.
Sure, but a lot of the vax-skeptics have been pretty explicit about the fact that they won't take the ones currently available. But some will take the Novavax one since it's basically just an annual flu shot. My wife's refused to take the mRNA ones, but she did plan to take Novavax if it ever went on the market.
That's where I've been. If it's essentially the same as the flu vaccine with annual updates then I might get it. Of course, I don't get the flu shot most years and have only gotten it a few times since I stopped working at a retirement home 10 years ago.
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/stacey-lennox/2022/07/13/what-could-go-wrong-next-nation-wide-railroad-strike-looms-for-monday-and-bidens-asleep-at-the-switch-n1612606
Railroad strike immanent. Is Mayor Pete still busy dealing with racist highways?
We'll see. Democrats and socialists do love themselves some trains.
And Unions. We need to give $53T to the pension fund and they'll be back at work in no time.
"Work"
Anybody that tells me atlas shrugged is fiction is being disproven by today's regime
Rarely quoted line from the book that is widely used today without citation:
"It's not my fault! I need wider powers".
W. Mouch.
He's looking at color swatches for his new digs in Traverse City.
Is Mayor Pete still busy dealing with racist highways?
I thought he and his biologically-bepenised spousal unit were still on maternity leave despite the fact that neither one of them is actually a birthing-capable individual?
Huhn also testified that DNA from the clinic in Indianapolis is being tested against samples from Fuentes, as well as the child's siblings, to confirm contribution to the aborted fetus.
"Fuentes is almost certainly a male relative of the victim."
Stating the obvious or saying the quiet part out loud?
Robby - The story about the raped 10 year old going around was that she COULDN'T get an abortion in OH. From what I've seen that part seems to be false. I've only seen a few pundits address it, most seem to ignore that part of it. But that was ultimately what the story was about, that new post-Roe laws would force her and others in a like situation to carry the child to term. It's sad the incident is true, good the perpetrator was arrested, but is it true that the family was forced to go out of state because of current OH law?
Even if that part is not true it has to be true because the true narrative tells us what is true.
A pregnancy clearly is a threat to the life of a 10 year old girl. It's an exception in my Ohio as I understand it. The story actually has almost nothing to do with abortion law.
Still got the abortion didn't she. I don't see what the problem is. People have to put in a little more effort? The horror!
And not even really that much more. There are plenty of places *in IN and OH respectively* where you have to drive just as far if not further to get less routine and more critical care.
Sorry, we're not disrupting the amber waves of grain so that abortion clinics can be more numerous and accessible than highway rest stops. Maybe focus on preventing the rape of a 10-yr.-old girl instead.
I don't really know, though I don't think it changes much. If Ohio didn't have a rape/incest exception that's their state's prerogative and is probably more logically consistent anyway.
Someone in NY being mad about what's going on in Ohio isn't that meaningful. The same is true in reverse. There are extremes where this is not true, but in general each state doing things is that states business.
Yes, it is true. The Ohio law makes no exceptions, despite what any Ohio attorney general or other politician said.
At this point I will never take any Covid vaccine of any kind.
The powers involved have proven themselves to be completely mendacious. Not to mention the little inconvenient fact that there's no need to take them if you're not in a high risk group anyway because recovering from the wuhan lab virus infection is way better for you in terms of immunity.
>>never take any Covid vaccine of any kind
word. ping-pong competition to be last man standing?
The Novavax one is actually pretty benign. It's components are more like a traditional flu vaccine and doesn't replicate COVID spike proteins like the mRNA ones do.
So they say....
color me skeptical about any vax info at this point.
Novavax not having any good connections in the government like Pfizer and Moderna is the far more likely reason this took so long to get approved than anything else. It's actually a lot more suspicious that it took the FDA so long to approve it in the first place, considering how the trials went.
Seriously, there's plenty of discussion on this vaccine going back for well over a year. If it was like the mRNA ones, it would have already been mentioned.
COVID and new variants pounce!
https://twitter.com/ArtValley818_/status/1547549635358724099?t=3x2W-e7s3VmW4DZxhJ4tGQ&s=19
Ray Epps is free but this 69 year old sweet woman with cancer just went to prison
[Video]
clearly that lady was a threat to democracy.
NYT says Ray Epps is mad everyone knows his name
Feds usually are
Not only is Ray Epps free, but he's getting sympathetic stories in NYT. Apparently he is the only person present at the rally who is worthy of any sort of sympathy or mercy.
The guy caught on video leading everyone else into the building and calling for violence is an innocent little lamb, but the guy who wore buffalo horns and took selfies was a threat to democracy.
You have to will yourself to that level of ignorance.
>>which is now likely to become the main focus of the conservative response to the story.
such vitriol, ENB ... oops I mean Robby
We're seriously still doing this bullshit, wasting all the time and money on these Covid "vaccines", even though they're completely worthless and ineffective and stopping the spread of this is obviously 100% impossible?
We're truly living in Idiocracy now. It can't be very much longer before we're trying to irrigate our crops with Brawndo.
It’s got what plants crave!
It really blows my mind we are still throwing money at a problem that doesn't need anymore resolving. I just don't get it ether.
Also can someone with more science knowledge explain why their booster (if that's for you) for this year is going to be omicron? Shouldn't it be a guess at the next strain?
They no longer rename strains. They just make it Omicron BA.1/BA.2/BA 12 Monkeypox.Edition
So once they develop an Omicron booster, it will work forever.
“It really blows my mind we are still throwing money at a problem that doesn't need anymore resolving.”
graft
grăft
noun
1. Deceitful or fraudulent use of one's position, especially in public office, to obtain personal profits or advantages.
2. Money or advantage obtained by such means.
Shouldn't it be a guess at the next strain?
They're guessing skills have proven inadequate to even the final round of Wheel Of Fortune, what makes you think they'd come up with a better guess than "Uh, we've got vanilla flavor and omicron flavor and I pick omicron flavored cuz it's my favorite!"
> Also can someone with more science knowledge explain why their booster (if that's for you) for this year is going to be omicron? Shouldn't it be a guess at the next strain?
Can't claim to be an expert, but from what I have gathered:
1) They really don't have any basis to make a guess. For the flu, they look at what is circulating in Asia, because that usually makes its way over to us. For COVID, what will be circulating in 6 months probably hasn't been discovered yet.
2) Close probably counts. The flu changes far more than COVID does, so scientists need to make an accurate prediction for the flu, but it isn't as big of a deal for COVID. The important parts change slowly enough that the antibodies can still bind to a new variant, just with decreased efficiency. So, if they make something for BA.5, it will probably be close enough to what is circulating in 6 months to be effective.
• Twitter is suing Elon Musk for backing out of his deal to acquire the company.
Twitter being forced to go through discovery is going to be *finger-kiss* magnifique
This is certainly a winding and useless tale. Which reminds me of my own storytelling and so I like it.
It was not insane to approach the story with some skepticism, given that its single source was someone with only secondhand knowledge of the circumstances.
How very generous of Robby. Maybe you were wrong to question this story but you weren't INSANE to do so.
Beyond that, there's a lot of untruth spread about Ohio's abortion laws. The first is that this pregnancy would have qualified as an emergency situation and she could have gotten an abortion there. The second is that Ohio's law is not a "6-week" ban, it's a heartbeat ban, and there's no confirmation over whether the baby had a detectable heartbeat.
What's craziest to me is to learn that a 10 year old was raped and it seemingly was not a family member. These cases where you hear of girls that young being raped, it's almost always involving someone related to her who has access.
What's craziest to me is to learn that a 10 year old was raped and it seemingly was not a family member.
I believe she was raped more than once... so there's some dark shit going on here for sure.
Or maybe it was a family member, but it's not being reported that, which is kinda crazy. I suppose they're worried about the victim's anonymity.
Or it's made up bullshit for propaganda purposes.
They already published his name. Everyone in the community familiar with them probably already has a good idea of who the kid is by now.
Assuming they didn't all already know.
I'm almost certain it was a family member. Even if it wasn't the man currently accused.
I actually think the lack of reporting is a Twitter-era, real-time news, clusterfuck. Nobody's sure who they can pull their dick out of and stick it in without fucking the wrong person.
How do we know she was raped according to Guatemalan customs and law? For all we know she could have been the alleged offender's wife. Thanks to this dolt of a president we don't know who's in this country or where.
https://ngo.locals.com/post/2416857/audio-obtained-of-kboo-radio-host-accused-of-raping-canadian-child
Another Antifa radio host has been arrested for trafficking and raping a child.
Where is white Mike to defend this guy?
Prowling for a child to rape?
But that QAnon thing is crazy for saying that the left is full of pedophiles.
Is there a clear, precise picture of his laminated Antifa membership card? - White Mike
Even so, federal health officials have yet to determine who the vaccine will be for.
Then how in hell can it be "approved"?
Who or what was it tested on? Surely it is "approved" for that group.
I love "emergency" approvals when there is no emergency. The Communist Chinese Virus in its various forms has been around for years. The 'emergency that never was' is long over.
Not looking good for regaining the little bit of trust they had before those damn bats messed us all up.
Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22
The Dobbs decision was on the 24th, the purported abortion happened on the 30th.
What kind of game are you playing ENB?
Oops, Robby. Same pile, better hair.
The point being she got the abortion nine days after being discovered, and seven days after Dobbs. That's not how the lefty meme went.
the dude hitting on AOC @her press conference yesterday was a hoot.
I didn't see it, but you know, I say go for it my friend. Dating is hard. Sometimes you have to take a big swing.
Big booty latina!
I would take that big of a swing but I'm spoken for & AOC doesn't cross my path often
She probably got more pissed because he called her a latina rather than a latinxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
"My varied breakfast taco."
What's really hilarious about Jill Biden's gaffe there is that San Antonio's taquerias are, for the most part, absolute garbage. You can get far better Tex-Mex at an average hole in the wall in New Mexico than you can get anywhere in Texas except, perhaps, some places in the Rio Grande Valley.
San Antonio is known more for having a bunch of "big ol' women," as Charles Barkley so eloquently put it, than good food.
I would pounce her
Imagine her in Requiem For A Dream doing the ever popular Ass To Ass
Her booty is nowhere near good enough to make up for those whacked-out, murderous crazy eyes that look like could go all Lorena Bobbitt on you while you're sleeping
Just picture her and Kamala doing the Requiem Ass to Ass scene. Ass to ass!!
Well one of the consequences of new medical abortion restrictions is that at least eight states now require that any prescriptions for methotrexate not be used to end a pregnancy with felony charges if violated. That now means many doctors are no longer taking the risk of prescribing it even for - rheumatoid arthritis.
You prolifers have not even begun to receive the backlash that's coming
That now means many doctors are no longer taking the risk of prescribing it even for - rheumatoid arthritis.
Get fucked with this bullshit made-up hysteria. No doctor is going to be charged with a felony for providing a prescription for methotrexate to a patient with arthritis.
You abortion maximalists are REALLY pissed that you can't get more than 20% support for your position, aren't you?
I mean, maybe. But it will settle down over time as things are defined a bit more. The SC just confirmed that doctors acting in good faith aren't responsible for the side-effects of medications. This was specifically about opioids, but could easily be applied here.
I can easily imagine doctors are a bit shaken up after a big change in jurisprudence, observing this is actually a very Burkean conservative observation, but things will resolve over time.
Yes, another scotus decision completely destroys Jfree’s bullshit.
Doubt
You prolifers have not even begun to receive the backlash that's coming
You don't understand that it's possible to be in favor of overturning Roe v Wade without being prolife right?
Be careful what you asked for.
Shouldn't the real question about NovaVax be if it works better than the mRNA vaccines? Because they kinda sucked.
Nova defo has more pounce to the vaccination ounce
Say whatever you want about Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos, they never tried to sell me a fucking popsicle for ten bucks. I just cannot even imagine the level of cognitive dissonance required to charge ten dollars for a crappy ice cream snack and still pretend you're somehow "subverting" capitalism.
As a former Nuclear, Biological and Chemical NCO at Fort Bragg, NC I can tell you that you CANNOT VACCINATE against a biological agent. DOD tried to do it for Anthrax and all they did was put 12 shots of poison in us. You can TREAT a biological agent but CANNOT VACCINATE AGAINST IT. Since whoever created this bio weapon in WuHan made it so that it mutates and changes and adapts this BIOWEAPON will be around for a long time. So people are going to continue to get sick and infected and some may even die because they don't have an IMMUNE SYSTEM BUILT UP to fight off the infection. STOP WITH THE CDC STUPIDITY AND DR. FRANKENFAUCI LIES!