San Francisco Recalls Progressive District Attorney Chesa Boudin
Mayor London Breed, who has herself recently pivoted away from criminal justice reforms, will select Boudin's successor.

With more than two thirds of votes counted, San Franciscans have voted by a comfortable margin to recall District Attorney Chesa Boudin.
Boudin, the latest in a trend of progressive prosecutors across the country, came into office in January 2020 promising reform. In office, he expanded diversion programs, like drug or mental health treatment, as an alternative to incarceration; he refused to try juveniles as adults or seek the death penalty; and he forbade prosecutors in his office from seeking cash bail.
But many blamed Boudin for rising crime in his city. Last fall, viral videos spread of smash-and-grab robberies in the Bay Area. And rates of homicide, gun violence, and car theft are up since Boudin entered office. Recall efforts began over a year ago, in April 2021.
At the same time, it is not apparent that Boudin was to blame: As The New York Times reported this week, "There is no compelling evidence that Mr. Boudin's policies have made crime significantly worse in San Francisco. Overall crime in San Francisco has changed little" under his tenure.
As Reason's Elizabeth Nolan Brown wrote, "Democrats are far from immune from the crime panics that plague conservatives, and Boudin is serving as their scapegoat." Supporters of criminal justice reform worried that a successful recall effort could lead to efforts to oust other progressive prosecutors across the country. Boudin may have indeed been bad at the politics of the job, but to blame him for single-handedly causing crime to spike is entirely different.
San Francisco Mayor London Breed will now choose Boudin's replacement. Breed, who previously advocated defunding the city's police budget, pivoted late last year, declaring it time for "the reign of criminals who are destroying our city…to come to an end" and pledging to be "less tolerant of all the bullshit that has destroyed our city."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Stopped clocks and blind squirrels; one of the few times ever voting in SF where my vote ended up on the winning side.
This incompetent doofus has managed to put together a saturation "VOTE NO" campaign over the last several weeks, endorsed by every lefty org in the city; seems that might not be enough.
Good riddance; most all restaurants are looking for help, if you can keep your yap shut.
incompetent doofus
Don't you mean "malicious commie rat bastard"?
-jcr
You talking about Joe Lancaster or Boudain?
I’ve made so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. (res-42) It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do.
.
For more details visit:>>> https://brilliantfuture01.blogspot.com/
How about "road kill"?
"...San Francisco Mayor London Breed will now choose Boudin's replacement. Breed, who previously advocated defunding the city's police budget, pivoted late last year, declaring it time for "the reign of criminals who are destroying our city…to come to an end" and pledging to be "less tolerant of all the bullshit that has destroyed our city."..."
Breed also, out Newsom-ed Newsom in closing businesses that the greaseball left open. Now keep in mind that outside of trading her race card into a winning count for mayor, this woman's highest achievement was moving from 'public housing' to leach off of a landlord in a rent-controlled unit.
So, after turning Union Square (formerly a high-end tourist shopping destination) into a boarded-up 3rd-world war zone, the asshole has the nerve to address a meeting of the CoC earlier this year, begging businesses to require their workers to return to the office, absent any apology for the disaster SHE caused.
She got a polite golf-clap and (from my view) a lot of 'eye rolls'. None of those with experience in business was inclined to waste time and breath attempting to educate such a total ignoramus.
Well, as long as Nancy Pelosi could get her hair done, while Mr. Nancy sat in the car and drank cosmos, all was good.
"And rates of homicide, gun violence, and car theft are up since Boudin entered office...Overall crime in San Francisco has changed little under his tenure."
Huh?
Foreseeable outcome. You "can't" quit prosecuting homicide and grand theft auto, but when you refuse to prosecute petty theft, assault, etc. you would expect the overall numbers stagnate or decrease. It's up to you, the reader, to decide exactly how disingenuous the NYT or Toosilly is in repeating the fact/lie with statistics.
That’s how you propaganda.
Yup. Good comrades know that homicides, gun violence, and car theft are not significant factors in "overall" crime.
Hahahaha. Libertarian Case for Liberal Propaganda.
Crime panic? Are you kidding? Over the last few decades, San Francisco has turned from a beautiful, livable world-class city into a literal shithole, with entire streets occupied by tent dwellers, large numbers of drug addicts dying on the street, and people being afraid to step out on the street. If that isn't reflected in the crime statistics, it's because a lot of crimes aren't even counted anymore as crimes.
Again, are you effing kidding? It's his job to fix the crime problems in the city by enforcing the law strictly and by quickly and efficiently removing criminals from the streets.
Instead, Boudin circumvented the legislature and thumbed his nose at the rule of law. That would be grounds enough for his removal (and punishment) even if it had no effect at all. It is not, and has never been, Boudin's job to substitute his personal views of criminal justice for the laws passed by the legislature.
Who knew that 60% of San Francisco voters were conservatives consumed by a "crime panic"?
Well, if anyone is still in the closet in SFC, it would be conservatives.
Exactly. I usually agree with "Reason" articles but this one was off-base. If you live in San Francisco, you see firsthand the result of announcing that much crime will be consequence-free. So little crime is reported anymore, as being a useless waste of one's time, that official numbers are not reliable.
"Reason" had a recent article about Seattle parking, where I live, and similarly it was also clear that the reporter was writing from elsewhere. He was just accepting government reports without any skepticism and no firsthand knowledge, drawing absurd conclusions.
Nolan Brown lives in Washington, D.C. I am originally from the East, long ago. My experience is that Easterners have very little understanding of the West, and very little recognition that they do not understand it.
I would have thought libertarians would look askew at official government reports but, alas, they lap it up like a WaPo writer.
So, ENB is off the hook then?
ENB has come out lately as a whiny liberal with a few pet topics that play well with most libertarians.
Lately? She's clearly a FAR left progressive and that's been obvious for years; especially since TDS broke her along with the other progressives in our country.
Whiny is being charitable. More like, dishonest shill. There is almost never any blame placed towards her fellow progressives. It's always those evil, dastardly Republicans; pouncing on poor, good intention-ed progressives.
Sayonara, asshole
Why couldn't that escaped con have killed this asshole and his asshole parents?
Cuz crime is down?
So let me get this straight - the prosecutor setting a policy of not prosecuting theft under 900 and the resulting spoke of crimes in SF are not only not related - there is no increase?
So these people were smash and grabbing before he was elected?
Isn't this like how the Russians were responsible for a gas price spike that started a year before their invaded?
It's not surprising: if you declare crimes not to be crimes and refuse to prosecute them, there might even be a decrease... in the statistics.
Apparently it is surprising to the author - who claims that SFs crime is rising while simultaneously claiming that during Boudin's term, crime is the same as under his predecessors.
This is Sgt. Schultz 101 : If it isn't prosecuted, it isn't a crime.
That is how there is not increase.
It's worse in reality, and for perfectly predictable reasons:
Boudin refused to prosecute for X amount of shop lifting *PER PERSON*.
The thugs, being much smarter than the average proggie, immediately began gang-stripping the shelves in convenience stores and drug stores.
Chains began closing stores in certain 'hoods, leading to charges of 'red-lining', which it was: 'red-lining' high-crime areas where theft made the stores un-profitable.
Proggy policies are nothing if not good at cascading poor outcomes far beyond the immediate disasters,
No guys, you're missing what I'm saying - I get all that about the stripping shelves and whatnot that has occured on his watch.
THE AUTHOR, in this article, is saying crime has both increased and not increased while Boudin was in office.
You expect critical thinking from Reason editors? That's NOT how you support the narrative for progressives! Those cocktail parties don't sent out invites to disobedient, token Libertarians.
I'm really not convinced by sociologists (who are well known to have a strong bias towards the left) spinning numbers saying crime hasn't spiked in San Francisco. The fact is, the system is so dysfunctional, nobody even bothers reporting crimes any more, because it's just a waste of time, nothing will happen, nobody will get arrested, much less prosecuted. The only ones that get reported are the ones that are impossible to ignore, like murders, gunshots, and car theft...oh wait, those are all up.
There is a reason Dirty Harry was set in SF.
He did his best to stem the wokeness
https://youtu.be/9rcIJIWqYmo?t=30
We need an army of Clint Eastwood clones to clean that place up.
Even then it was a freak show.
FUN clip!
I absolutely agree, from Seattle, a similar paradise transformed into dystopia, along with Portland. It has to be seen to be believed.
I get it that a libertarian can sympathize with some parts of Boudin's politics, but the man outright dismisses property rights as having any value. No real friend of liberty at all.
He was endorsed by the San Fran Libertarian party. There are going to be lots of tears at Reason tonight.
He was endorsed by the San Fran Libertarian party.
Those rascally Mises Caucus bastards, ruining the LPs good name again! /s
Holy shit, really? Damn, LP is a real shitshow.
"San Fran Libertarian party"
As if.
I'm not sure how much I will support the LP's new stances - but they became a clownshow 'Progressive lite' party over the last decade and they sorely needed a shake-up/wake-up.
The only property rights Reason appears to care about are tech company’s.
Standing in the rain, there is no compelling evidence I am all wet.
Touché
Rain? Are you sure it was not Boudin pissing on your leg?
It's like that scene in 30 Rock when Jack goes to work for Homeland Security and the roof is leaking. He asks Cooter about the leak and Cooter says "No, it's not. I'll show you the study."
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! 🙁
This is a terrible setback for the Koch / Soros / Reason soft-on-crime #FreeTheCriminals and #EmptyThePrisons agenda.
#CheapLaborAboveAll
How are either the NYT or Elizabeth Nolan Brown considered reliable sources for the notion that Boudin's policies weren't responsible for San Francisco's increased crime? He is extremely political, hard left and made no bones about placing his politics ahead of everything else. He and his supporters believed that was a selling point until the crime wave recently became undeniable. Saying well it's not really his fault is a fallback defensive line. The next one will be something like SF is too white and "racist."
1. It's not happening.
2. It's happening but it's not that bad.
3. It's happening and it's worse than we expected. <- NYT/ENB are here.
4. It's a good thing.
"He did not do 'soft on crime' hard enough!"
He is extremely political, hard left
His parents were weather underground. He was raised by Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dorhn. He's a communist. It's not a secret.
ENB swoons for him. Clearly. No wonder she's not posting any Matt Yglesia's articles in the daily links any more. She's got a new crush.
and pledging to be "less tolerant of all the bullshit that has destroyed our city."
It's unusual for a sitting mayor to acknowledge that her city has been destroyed.
Sitting mayor or shitting mayor?
For London Breed, either works.
"There is no compelling evidence that Mr. Boudin's policies have made crime significantly worse in San Francisco."
Well, even IF ( and that's a big if) he's not responsible for the rise in crime, his policies certainly did nothing to make it any better.
As Reason's Elizabeth Nolan Brown wrote, "…crime panics that plague conservatives,”
Remember yesterday when Mike Liarson reminded us that Reason never does outrage and always reports using “Reason” and doesn’t emote?
San Francisco Mayor London Breed [is] pledging to be "less tolerant of all the bullshit that has destroyed our city."
With great promises like that, she's a shoo-in for re-election.
Less tolerant vs. intolerant of. It's the GOPe 'fail slower / cheaper' plan.
Let us think about your statement.
SF has been declining for the last 30 years under the leadership of Progressives.
Not a single Republican Mayor in all that time, ultra "pregressive Board of Stupidvisors and you want to put this on the GOP somehow?
Your check from George Soros is waiting.
yeah, and NOW they choose to follow piss poor GOPe tactics. I wasn't blaming the GOP for SF, but rather how 'less tolerant' is such a BS response that it reminded me of the GOP and ... well ... everything.
Or suicide.
Your statistics sound a lot like San Francisco stopped prosecuting small crimes of theft, so people stopped bothering to report because no one would do anything.
Not only that but I find it hard to consider all crime equal as they appear to be doing. Rob me of $50 and it's one crime, shoot me and it is still one crime as if the two are equivalent?
Yeah, that's also a biggy. There is a reason violent crime gets broken out into its own category often.
NYT also wants to mint a trillion dollar coin to payoff US debt. The NYT fired an editor to appease their millennial workforce that cannot handle a quote and having a discussion as adults. Is this really a source to quote for crime analysis.
Boudin's orders have caused an increase in crime. This is apparent. All for nothing as Californians still supporting Newsome demonstrates they are lost and happy with the shit they live in.
But perhaps the Boudin recall shows that delusional Californians do have limits, starting when idealistic progressive policies lead to actual impacts on coddled upper class lives.
something something London calling
She'll announce her pick on Capitol Radio. I'm sure it will surprise both Police and Thieves. I'd be worried if I were a Ghetto Defendant.
Whoever she picks will still be Garbage.
It is bizarre to me that there isn't a single mention of Soros in this article. It reads like a stub.
Oh look at that. It was written by the Reason Intern, who lives in Washington DC.
Mr Lancaster isn't in San Francisco. He has nothing to do with California. But he is HAPPY to tell us how unfair it is that the people LIVING IN SAN FRANCISCO are angry with Boudin. Why, as his sole proof, he has the New York Times to tell us about it.
This is the worst.
Okay, hearing this was written by an intern makes this article's issues much more understandable. College students tend to be easily taken in by bad statistics. No life experience to fall back in when fed bullshit.
I heartily invite any of Boudin's supporters to take a barefoot stroll through the tenderloin. Of course, I'm sure a lot of them would enjoy the needle sticks, sick fucks that they are.
-jcr
And, as most interns, Lancaster just might be preening for his first real job.
"There is no compelling evidence that Mr. Boudin's policies have made crime significantly worse in San Francisco. Overall crime in San Francisco has changed little"
Do you believe everything you read in the NYT? The Times offers "no compelling evidence" that this statement is true. Boudin specifically said he wouldn't prosecute many crimes. Is this possibly a reason why "overall crime" "changed little"? Liberal prosecutors like Boudin who specifically said they would avoid indicting black people on principle, until the U.S. stopped being racist, were exactly what the criminal justice movement does not need. Boudin had a number of good ideas, but lots of bad ones too.
Do you believe everything you read in the NYT?
If he reads the Times, you know the answer.
No, Boudin's policies alone did not make San Francisco significantly worse. However, he is part-in-parcel of a problem in San Francisco, and as a DA, he has a high profile which can be targeted by the electorate. He got recalled, fair and square.
This was Tony Benn's five principles of Democracy put into action:
He's done been gotten rid of. Buh bye!
The Times felt Blasey-Ford was credible. To show how serious they are.
Soave thought she was credible.
I didn't see ANY Reason editors that didn't believe she was credible!
I'd just like to suggest to this snotty little red-diaper baby who never should have made it through the bar's character and fitness review that if he ever wants to atone for what he's done to San Francisco, there is no apology more sincere than hara-kiri.
-jcr
Don’t know this clown from Adam, but my sense is he’s another Marxist stooge. They always manage to twist social reform into social chaos.
What’s sweet here is the people spoke, loud and clear. And obviously they weren’t MAGA voices
Their message wasn’t muddy, either: pretty much it reads go fuck yourself and the horse you road in on.
In Frisco of all places. Jeez. Maybe there’s hope.
His parents were far left American terrorists. Weather Underground. Responsible for a couple of murders.
The sort of domestic terrorist the government and media like to pretend do not exist.
Didn’t know that. Figures. Unfortunately, I’m too familiar with the Underground. My era crowd. Some prof even made me read Hayden’s Port Huron tract. Put me to sleep.
But the academics and apparatchiks can’t let it go. They still look for Lenin to make a comeback.
" And obviously they weren’t MAGA voices"
Duh. Anyone who contradicts progressive doctrine is de facto MAGA. Don't you know how to tribal?
Heh. Frisco voters soon to be cancelled by woke. Eating their own.
If he ever wants to atone, he should be dropped off after dark in the heart of gang territory with no wallet and no cell phone. Preferably hobbled by a sprained ankle.
Too easy. Add a Diehard-style "I hate niggers" sign.
San Francisco Recalls Progressive District Attorney Chesa Boudin
Mayor London Breed, who has herself recently pivoted away from criminal justice reforms, will select Boudin's successor.
We need to be crystal fucking clear on what... exactly... we mean when we say pivoted "away" from "criminal justice reforms".
As per usual, when the far left gets involved with criminal justice "reform", the "reform" ends up being a comprehensive system of tolerating-- and in some cases encouraging-- criminality.
So as per usual, when the predicted and OBVIOUS results are felt, the electorate gets a bit tetchy... thus forcing these "reforming" politicians "away from "reforms".
There are relatively easy, reasonable and (for the most part) libertarian criminal justice reforms that could be undertaken, but instead, we have to go all fucking super-commie-Weather Underground-defund-the-police-abolish-all-prisons-herbert marcuse-angela-davis-critical-theories-decolonize-everything.
Jesus, libertarians, be more careful when choosing your friends.
Quoting the N.Y. Times is like quoting from Grimm's Fairy tales. Both fiction and entertaining. It's nice to see so many from the Times on James O'keefe's wall of shame.
The good citizens of Frisco got what they deserve. Electing people like Boudin and Breed have come back to bite them in the arse....good and hard.
I call this latest clown show buyer's remorse.
Now let's see if the people of Chicago can muster up the will to remove Kim Foxx and Beetlejuice.
Don't count on it.
OK, I see the intern thing in other comments. Bless their little intern hearts.
"Reason" editors, don't let this kind of thing slide, this sloppy reporting along the lines of high school book reports.
I am actually beginning to cut back on "Reason" reading lately, and this low level of reporting and understanding of libertarian positions does not help at all.
BTW I applaud the shake-up of the Mises Caucus.
You would think with Reason's boner for illegal aliens we would have columns by Juan Tortilla or Jose Torquemada. Wouldn't matter if they were illiterate, Fiona would gladly transcribe their works.
BTW, Boudin is a huge supporter of the Venezuelan disaster; perhaps he can find his way to an airport and lend his expertise there.
I'll throw in $20.
as will I
BTW, Seattle got rid of their DA and replaced him with a... wait for it.. Republican. And while I'm no biologist, xe is a woman. I believe this might have been the first Republican elected to any city office since I've lived here. And I moved here in the late 80s.
How do you do it? I don’t even like to visit Seattle anymore.
I was stunned, and I think the local media was stunned too. But if you look at what's happened in Seattle, it's rather shocking to see.
And man, this is very hard for me to admit, because I have become so cynical that I literally don't believe anything ANY local politician says or claims, but Bruce Harrel, the new mayor appears to be at least trying to do something about this problem.
And there are local activist groups that aren't happy. They're engaging in acts of vandalism whenever a homeless camp is cleared. "You wipe, we strike" or some such message is left behind where property is defaced or destroyed after a homeless camp is cleared.
The homeless camp at the bottom of my street just got cleared a couple of days ago (it's been there for at least a year) and now the park has huge red signs on it "Park Temporarily Closed".
People are angry. I kind of suspected something might start happening when the clean cut white neighborhoods started to feel the effects. When I started reading stories about shocked, upper middle class Seattleites saying stuff like "I can't believe there's a camp in MY neighborhood!" , I began to wonder if we'd start to see action.
Personally, I haven't been downtown in two years and have zero desire to go there. Sure, you can blame a lot of the decay and closures on COVID, but COVID (for the most part) is mostly over-- from a lockdown standpoint-- and yet no one is returning downtown because it fucking blows.
I don't go to the 7-11 at the bottom of my hill after dark any more because I was assaulted in the parking lot by some meth addict... or mentally ill meth addict... or mentally ill person... who can tell?
Even when I go during the daytime, I do a scan of the parking lot to see who's near the door hanging out, what their demeanor is etc. There's almost always at least one homeless guy asleep or half drunk in front of the store, but if he's "out of it", I consider that safe enough to enter.
One of the problems with the harm reduction measures is they're incomplete or don't take into account the second-order effects. One example is decriminalization of drug possession and use.
As someone who supports drug legalization, when you keep drugs illegal but simply stop arresting people for having them, there's still an illegal market surrounding the drug trade. Someone is selling those drugs TO those homeless people. So now gangs fight over the turf to sell drugs to the homeless people-- hence crime and shootings go up. The homeless still have to find ways of paying for those drugs, and without any former barriers that stop them from using or at least removed them from the street if arrested for possession, they have to commit secondary crimes to earn enough to purchase the illegal drugs. Sure, you kept some homeless people out of jail, and hooray for compassion! But now you've created a dozen secondary spinoff problems that become harder to control.
Stu should be named in charge of the west coast. Stu Nami.
"And rates of homicide, gun violence, and car theft are up since Boudin entered office...Overall crime in San Francisco has changed little under his tenure."
Though technically this may not be a contradiction, for this statement to be true, lesser crimes must have decreased.
However, this is a very questionable statement by the author: while violent crimes have increased, don't worry, overall crime is the same. Really?!
"As The New York Times reported this week, "There is no compelling evidence that Mr. Boudin's policies have made crime significantly worse in San Francisco. Overall crime in San Francisco has changed little" under his tenure."
Quoting a conclusion arrived at by the NYT as support is something that begs to be ignored. Reason: please show the evidence and let the reader draw a conclusion.
I've been meaning to post this for a while, but this is an interview with Michael Shellenberger who wrote the book San Fransicko: Why Progressives Ruin Cities
I was only introduced to this guy recently, but he's an interesting guy.
I was half-expecting some kind of firebrand conservative shouting "I told you so" *raises hand* but instead was surprised to discover that he's a self described liberal and "former progressive".
During the interview he states that in the 90s he had worked for a series of Soros-funded "harm reduction NGOs". When he said that, I leaned forward in my chair and said out loud, "So wait, not only can we place you at the scene of the crime, but your fingerprints are all over the murder weapon."
At one point he gives a kind of mea culpa over the state of things in these progressive cities. He says that he felt "betrayed" (or possibly "misled", I don't recall the exact word he used) by these organizations. He essentially says that he naively believed that the "harm reduction" policies would be a two-way street. That essentially these organizations would "provide" harm reduction measures to the "vulnerable" populations but in return, they'd give something back such as an agreement to get into rehab, perhaps they'd stop committing crime, maybe they'd stop assaulting people, perhaps they might take an interest in cleaning up their lives and get a job-- becoming a productive member of society. But instead what happened was that the entire process was a one way street. That the harm reduction policies and organizations gave and gave and gave, and there was no expectation of getting anything in return.
It's a good interview, I recommend it.
i was impressed by shellenberger and hope he makes another run at it. i agree that he is very well spoken and his policies seem like those i would enact
his interview with joe rogan is good as is his interview with jon coupal of the howard jarvis taxpayers assoc. liked him on bill maher too
Melissa Chen (interviewed recently by Reason) is a very big fan of his.
He was literally raised by terrorists! He is a dumpster fire disaster. Boudin is a DA whose constituents are felons.
A-Dee-Ose, you self-impressed pantload. your "progressive" horseshit just got your ticket pulled. you fooled them once and got yo seff elected but once they got to know you even the retards that run that sewer of a city couldn't take it anymore. that makes you a GENUINE loser
Reason says, "San Francisco crime not up".
I mean, did they think to themselves, "I like Boudin and
need to say good stuff about him", and just make up some
good stuff?
Let's have a petition to recall Joe Lancaster. How many online "Yes" votes do we need to get Reason's attention? I think we'll find they are as comfortable in the status quo as Congress.
If you're going to just make stuff up, why not aim
a little higher?
"During Boudin's tenure as DA, drug addiction was
nearly eliminated in San Francisco. His loss is
a tragedy for SF, and means that addiction will likely
return."
london breed, you are next along with gascon