One Year Later, No One Has Been Punished for the IRS Leak of Billionaires' Tax Data
The IRS isn’t just a powerful federal agency, it’s a weapon against the public.

In June 2021, ProPublica published confidential IRS tax information about wealthy Americans provided by a still-unidentified source. While we don't yet know who dumped the data, we do know that this is far from the first time that the tax agency, which forces people to reveal sensitive details about their finances, has proven to be an unreliable custodian of that information, and that's putting it nicely. Too often, federal tax collectors misuse official records for fun, profit, and political advantage.
"Today, ProPublica is launching the first in a series of stories based on the private tax data of some of our nation's richest citizens," ProPublica's Stephen Engelberg and Richard Tofel wrote on June 8, 2021. "Many will ask about the ethics of publishing such private data. We are doing so—quite selectively and carefully—because we believe it serves the public interest in fundamental ways, allowing readers to see patterns that were until now hidden."
Included in the treasure trove of tax data were details about the tax bills of people including Jeff Bezos and Warren Buffett. Drawn from IRS records, the information was provided through "secure systems that allow whistleblowers to transmit information to us without revealing their identity." The data revealed that many wealthy Americans successfully minimize their tax burdens, which might have been the source's purpose, though that's anybody's guess. People have many motivations for releasing information and ProPublica admits it doesn't know the source's intentions.
In fact, the IRS leaks like a sieve on a regular basis for all sorts of reasons.
"[T]he IRS completed 1,694 investigations into the willful unauthorized access of tax data by employees—and 27% were found to be violations," the U.S. Government Accountability Office reported last month.
"[Michael Kasper] was almost certainly one of the more than 330,000 Americans who fell victim to an audacious hack of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which was disclosed earlier this year," Quartz noted in 2015 of a man who discovered that somebody else collected his tax refund.
"Tea Party, anti-abortion and other conservative groups told Congress on Tuesday that the Internal Revenue Service held up their applications for tax exemptions, harassed them with questions and leaked their donor lists to political opponents," USA Today reported in 2013.
Outsiders penetrate inadequate security for gain while IRS employees often access and disclose financial information to satisfy personal curiosity, to make money, and to advance political causes. Sometimes those political causes are their own, and other times they're part of the agenda of whoever holds power in the federal government.
"The history of the I.R.S is riddled with repeated instances of agents acting out of self-interest or pursuing their own ideological agenda, as well as examples of Presidents, White House staff and Cabinet officials pressuring the tax agency to take political actions," The New York Times pointed out in 1989.
That abuse began early in the accumulation of the tax agency's powers.
"My father," Elliott Roosevelt, son of former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, once commented, "may have been the originator of the concept of employing the IRS as a weapon of political retribution."
FDR's administration may have been the first to weaponize the tax-collection agency, but it wasn't the last. John F. Kennedy established an "Ideological Organizations Audit Project" within the IRS to target his conservative political critics. Richard Nixon infamously used the tax agency as a political hit man against prominent Democrats. That the misuse of tax information continued is obvious from the Times story on the matter during the administration of Bush Sr. as well as from the scandal over the Obama-era mistreatment of Tea Party groups and, more recently, the ProPublica leak.
So, the use of tax data by ProPublica and its source to make a policy point isn't exactly groundbreaking. Some of the agents and politicians who weaponized the IRS in the past intended to make the world a better place by their lights, or at least to hurt only people and organizations they were convinced were bad. And leaks from government agencies often do achieve beneficial ends. Where would we be without Daniel Ellsberg's copies of the Pentagon Papers, Mark Felt's role as "Deep Throat" in the Watergate scandal, or Edward Snowden's revelations of government surveillance?
But leaks from the IRS aren't war plans, misuses of power, or politicians' schemes; they're sensitive, private financial information that we're forced to surrender to government agents. We have no choice but to fill out our tax forms even though we know that the federal employees receiving our information have a track record of abusing that data for their own ends and to our detriment.
And political goals aren't objectively good justifications for invading people's financial privacy. The National Taxpayers Union Foundation's Andrew Moylan and Andrew Wilford warned in Reason that ProPublica's use of the data was "deceptive and sure to lead to ill-advised policy making." Under the most charitable interpretation, that indicates a tendentious misuse of sensitive private information.
Not that the tax authorities necessarily care. History suggests that IRS leaks carry minimal consequences for the agency.
"The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) previously issued an audit report in September 2006 on the IRS's Office of Privacy and found that the IRS was not complying with legislative privacy requirements," TIGTA reported in 2013. "Despite its commitment toward privacy and improvements from our prior review, the IRS continues to face challenges in meeting legislative privacy requirements."
And here we are in 2022 with, apparently, still a good deal of room for improvement after decades of abuses of privacy by tax collectors and wrist-slaps by their watchdogs. Almost a year after the initial ProPublica story, and after Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen promised "to get to the bottom of this criminal activity," the federal government still claims to have no idea who leaked the data. "There have been no arrests nor any official hints about how the wall of secrecy around tax records was broken; it is unknown whether the IRS has found or closed any security gaps," reports the Wall Street Journal.
Many of us complain about the bite the government takes out of our paychecks. Even more pernicious, though, is that the information tax collectors force us to surrender is likely to be turned against us by politicians, government agents, and activists who see the details of our finances as tools with which to achieve their goals. The IRS isn't just a powerful federal agency, it's a weapon against the public.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"One Year Later, No One Has Been Punished for the IRS Leak of Billionaires' Tax Data"
And no one will be. Ever.
Just ask Lois Lerner.
Exactly. How much in tax dollars has she collected for her pension?
Billionaires (like Reason.com's benefactor Charles Koch) will be fine. Their preferred candidate Joe Biden won, which is why we're currently in the best, most billionaire-friendly economy in US history.
#InDefenseOfBillionaires
The + IRS = Theirs
The IRS is a law enforcement agency. So just like police officers, agents do whatever they want because the law doesn't apply to them.
If no-one has ever been convicted of the exact same circumstances of their actions how are they to know it's wrong?
They're feds. Probably have complete immunity.
The US Empire is supported by the majority. It violates rights and justifies its actions as "for the common good" or "for national security". It claims the alternative, a society free from the initiation of violence, threats, fraud, would result in chaos. It, or should I say, the authoritarians who advocate the coercive politics that is found in every country, claim the ruler/ruled paradigm is protection. To rule is to make rules (law). The ruled who vote to be ruled, obey or die. If you don't like it, you can go live on another planet. (Until we come.)
The IRS is a law enforcement agency.
No, it's an obedience enforcement agency. If it were a law enforcement agency, it would have to obey the law.
-jcr
So... unqualified immunity?
Its not that hard to figure out why no one has been jacked up for it. The leaker is a demorat. If they were a republican, they would have been marched through the town square in chains.
Yet we are assured daily that billionaires are Republicans. What I would have given to see the Left go after Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Michael Bloomberg, et al.
Now we know that there was nothing in Trump's tax returns. If there was it surely would have been leaked.
There are way to many pencildicked agents that would have loved to be the one to bring Trump down. Considering how frequently he's audited, there's nothing there.
Yep. Considering he was being actively audited at the time he became president.
All those leaks actually resulted in increased government power. The Pentagon Papers didn't end Vitenam or military adventurism which consumed the US since 2000. Watergate led to the special counsel plague that has hit pretty much every presidency since Nixon. The CIA is still spying on millions of Americans daily and Snowden is hiding in Russia.
Where would we be without Daniel Ellsberg's copies of the Pentagon Papers, Mark Felt's role as "Deep Throat" in the Watergate scandal, or Edward Snowden's revelations of government surveillance?
Really? Reason has so twisted itself into knots trying to excuse progressivism that it sees no difference between these guys and the IRS leaker? I'll help you out. These guys reported bad behavior of their own organizations, not perfectly legal but sensitive information extorted from others.
And the article pretty much says that in the very next paragraph. Really, guys, you are allowed to finish reading the article before commenting.
I mean, no one high up has been punished for trying to overthrow the government on 1/6. Leaking billionaire info? Small potatoes compared.
But hey, let's not worry about the republic. Let's worry about your Koch masters and how everyone is just so mean to them.
It's not due to a lack of investigation.
Perhaps not everybody did you were led to believe.
You do realize a corupt government that weilds its police powers to destroy its enemies and goes unpunished gives validity to the 1/6 protesters?
Protesters or rioters? The latter have no excuse.
By not punished, you mean locked up in a jail for a nonviolent crime with no bail options (bail reform, FTW!) only to eventually be found guilty months later of "disturbing the peace" or some such minor offense, or having the charges dropped altogether because there literally was no crime?
"Many will ask about the ethics of publishing such private data. We are doing so—quite selectively and carefully—because we believe it serves the public interest in fundamental ways, allowing readers to see patterns that were until now hidden."
Ah, yes, that magical (and completely subjective) "public interest".
You know who else did whatever they thought necessary to promote the "public interest"?
Well, we know it wasn't William Vanderbilt.
FDR.
Convenient that they held off on their series of articles until the runup to the mid-terms.
The double standards on "Hacked Materials" is disgusting. I'd suggest everyone flag the articles as disseminating hacked materials and lets see if Twitter bans them like the NY Post.
"But leaks from the IRS aren't war plans, misuses of power, or politicians' schemes; they're sensitive, private financial information that we're forced to surrender to government agents. We have no choice but to fill out our tax forms even though we know that the federal employees receiving our information have a track record of abusing that data for their own ends and to our detriment.
And political goals aren't objectively good justifications for invading people's financial privacy."
Once you have established that "whistleblower" leaks are to be protected, it is difficult to limit it to circumstances that you approve of.
LOL nobody gets held accountable for anything. Didn't you guys see the Sussman verdict? (Maybe not judging by the articles on the matter)
When abortionists bring up their Right to Privacy I fondly think of the IRS. Maybe they do have a principle, we just have yet to find it despite decades of searching.
How is it that any one person at the IRS can access the personal information of basically any American they want?
How is it that names are not hidden from rando IRS employees seeking access to tax records? If your job is processing tax refunds, you shouldn’t have the ability to do anything other process a refund to a particular SSN. Why is it that these records are identifiable at all to any single person?
How is it that it doesn’t take AT LEAST 2 separate individuals to authorize accessing any specific records?
How is it that the specific identities of every person seeking records isn’t automatically logged for posterity?
If I’m an investigator, I should have the ability to see the identity of every IRS agent who ever accessed a particular record, along with time and date stamps. They should also have to explain, in some detail, exactly why they’re accessing these records.
Most IRS employees shouldn’t even have the ability to see records outside of their specific purview.
>>The data revealed that many wealthy Americans successfully minimize their tax burdens
the data revealed what everyone knew w/o the illegal data dump.
where are we on the Whistleblowers good/Whistleblowers bad oscillation wave?
There's a joke in there somewhere, and I'm pretty sure it's NSFW...
But, I think it's still a matter of "Whistleblowers Good" if they're hurting your political enemies.
Same as
riotersmostly peaceful protesters.Be careful, if you whistle all day, when you get home, you’ll be too tired to pucker.
The federal agency government has been weaponized by the democrat party. They will never be held accountable for their actions against US Citizens. When they ARE caught, some low level bureaucrat will lose his job, or be transferred to another agency under cover of confidentiality, but there is NEVER punishment for those calling the shots.
All of the information that came out in the Sussman trial should bring indictments against high level agents of the Clinton Campaign, the DNC & the FBI, including Hillary, Marc Elias & James Comey. But we all know there are different rules for those invited to the inside the beltway parties (not the political kind of parties)!
Another whining Trumpanzee?
Who cares about billionaires? Best thing would be to shoot them into space on their own penis-rockets.
"The IRS...it's a weapon against the public."
The IRS is the logical result of empowering anyone to initiate violence against you, for any reason. How? It legally, by act of law makers, violates property rights, e.g., the right to keep your money.
How do people who violate your rights protect you?
How do they get that authority? Can others who can't legally rob you, who have no right to rob, gang up (vote), and morally authorize someone to do it for them? Would this politics be moral/practical?
huh, so thats why al capone lost, the IRS was used as a weapon against al capone.
More importantly it was used against the Glucose Trust and Fleischmann's yeast and their customers including Al. With distilleries shut down, entrepreneurs installed 2-story continuous stills to make ethanol from corn sugar and yeast. This provided roughly 95% of all alcohol consumed in the USA during prohibition. Quiz: what percentage of the US economy was illegal alcohol when penalties were increased in March 1929?
Why would anybody be punished? Democrats are using the IRS the way they intended it to be used: as an instrument to exercise power over the wealthy and the private sector.
Obviously the SCOTUS investigators consulted with the IRS investigators to study their techniques.
"Tea Party, anti-abortion and other conservative groups told Congress on Tuesday that the Internal Revenue Service held up their applications for tax exemptions, harassed them with questions and leaked their donor lists to political opponents," Um... where would one obtain a copy of this no-longer-secret information? (Asking for a friend)
More importantly it was used against the Glucose Trust and Fleischmann's yeast and their customers including Al. With distilleries shut down, entrepreneurs installed 2-story continuous stills to make ethanol from corn sugar and yeast. This provided roughly 95% of all alcohol consumed in the USA during prohibition. Quiz: what percentage of the US economy was illegal alcohol when penalties were increased in March 1929?