Review: Top Gun: Maverick
Tom Cruise’s long-delayed return flight.

Top Gun: Maverick is of course custom-made to scratch the international itch for big-budget, star-driven action movies—the kind that look cool with Tom Cruise snugged down in their cockpit. It's a better film than the first Top Gun, released 36 years ago this month, and much credit for that must go to new director Joseph Kosinski, who previously helmed Oblivion, another Cruise vehicle. Kosinski surpasses the late Tony Scott as a ringmaster of airborne acrobatics (note the shot of two jets flying in tandem across the screen when they're suddenly spun apart by a third jet blasting up between them from below). He also wields IMAX and Dolby Atmos technology with thunderous gusto, which is exactly what we want when the time arrives for a fighter jet to come screaming into view and fly sideways under a bridge.
The story? Well, Cruise is back as Captain Pete "Maverick" Mitchell—an officer who is still fighting off promotion to a higher rank because it would tear him away from the only thing he loves in life, which is being up in the air. Pete's actually not so much of a maverick now, having quit the mission-flying grind to become an instructor at the Navy's San Diego flight-training school, called TOPGUN. But despite his abundant energy and appealing twinkle, he still manages to annoy some key superiors—men with call names like "Cyclone'' (Jon Hamm) and "Hammer" (Ed Harris). (You walk out of this movie feeling a sudden need for a fun radio handle of your own.)
Pete is also getting heavy attitude from a new student called "Rooster" Bradshaw (Miles Teller), who is the son of his old flight partner, "Goose" Bradshaw. Goose, who was played by Anthony Edwards, was killed in the first movie, and Rooster has always blamed Pete for his death. This is not an especially compelling plot element, in part because Teller isn't an especially compelling actor. (Glen Powell, who was originally cast as Rooster, demonstrates how much more interesting the character might have been with his performance in a different role here, playing a likeable wiseass called "Hangman.")
Given his frequent personality conflicts with higher-ups, Pete is fortunate to have a top-brass guardian angel watching over him—his onetime frenemy Tom "Iceman" Kazansky (Val Kilmer), who has risen to the rank of fleet commander. This casting introduces a tone of bittersweet verité to the film: Kilmer, whose voice has been ravaged by throat cancer and tracheal surgeries, was brought back to reprise his old character at Cruise's insistence, and he gives a brief, touching performance.
Not invited back for this movie, unsurprisingly, was Kelly McGillis, who provided a gentle glow of PG love interest in the original Top Gun as a civilian flight instructor named Charlie. Her tousled presence in that film sat amusingly among such oddities as the locker-room scene in which we watched Pete and his buddies standing around in their towels and dog tags. McGillis, who's now 64, was happy to acknowledge looking her age in a recent interview, and said she hadn't expected to be called back. This left the new story short on romance, though, so Charlie has been replaced by a character named Penny, who's engagingly played by Jennifer Connelly. But Penny's function is a little tentative even after she and Pete bed down, especially after we've watched Pete and his buddies, shirtless and gleaming with body oil, engaged in a strenuous beach volleyball match.
But all of this story stuff is a distraction, of course. The point of the movie is the wide-open IMAX skies and the abundant zoom and swoop of the planes and the ecstatic faces of the pilots as they fulfill their destinies and blow things up. You want action? Here it is.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Capt. Mitchell would be well into his 60's with 40 years of service. How has managed to maintain his fighter jet flight status?
He maxed out on his pension 10 years ago, wouldn't it make more sense to retire and then get hired back on as a civilian instructor? Pension, retiree benefits, hefty paycheck, same job but wouldn't have to deal directly with the brass.
In the real military he'd have never passed 04. If he did and made 06 on time he'd have been told to retire for. It making 07.
And he'd have been told to retire at 30 years of service no matter what. You have to have a star to get past that.
On the plus side, the female love interest is actually age appropriate. A rarity in a Cruise movie.
You do realize that this is a movie and that movies are fantasy, even those which claim to be "based on a true story" or "based on real events". This is especially true when depicting the military (at least in most cases).
You do realize he was responding appropriately to someone making the point that you mistakenly attribute to the wrong commenter?
Did I offend the Reason hall monitor?
Damn, really? Who else knows about this?
Scarier than the number of people who think that Hollywood depicts actual portrayals of reality is the number of people who think they depict earnest portrayals of the way reality *should* be.
But he overcame all that by being inverted
*cough* Bullshit *cough*
No, he really was. I've got a picture of it.
Jennifer Connelly is still hot.
She was ridiculously pretty 30 years ago.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/9e/2b/e0/9e2be0017f84f196ad0ee750d6cabdd2.gif
Good over 50 love interest casting if you ask me.
Cute in Labyrinth, peaked in The Rocketeer, but was still hot in Career Opportunities.
I'm waiting for somebody to cast me as The Pony...
She could roller skate too:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-JLqVmPYKk
"On the plus side, the female love interest is actually age appropriate. A rarity in a Cruise movie."
In the original, Top Gun, Kelly McGillis is 5 years older than Cruise and looks more like she's 10 years older than him. He's 24 an looks young for his age, she's 29 and looks like she's in her early 30's.
He is not in the real military, he is a naval aviator.
Commissioned service past 30 years for non flag grade officers was enabled by Rumsfield.
He has the need for speed
We've recently seen the white man's music, i.e. West Side Story bomb even when sung by the correct race creed and color; here come two more white man epics, Elvis (the trailers look spectacular and the reviews and buzz at Cannes are off the charts) and the remake of Top Gun. The action in TG is the movie so that (and the genius of the last Hollywood Movie Start Tom Cruise) alone may save it ; be interesting to see how Elvis does in the hate the white man at any cost era.
West Side Story was doomed to fail because no one outside Megacity One these days is interested in watching an ethnic musical based in New York City. It worked the first time because it had Natalie Wood and musicals themselves were quite popular with the general public overall (yes, I'm aware of "Hamilton"; it's the exception that proves the rule). You could release a non-"diverse" version of "Seven Brides for Seven Brothers" or "Oklahoma" today, and those would flop, too.
Lee Marvin trying to sing in Paint Your Wagon is an absolute classic.
I agree completely. Musicals were a thing of their era. And West Side Story was a musical for a different era. It was actually timely back then.
See Cruise take Corden for a ride?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1iZtBM23bY
I was impressed.
I gotta admit I LOL'ed at the roasting marshmallows over the fire screaming "Eject! Eject! Aaaah!"
Cruise is actually a pretty cool guy, too bad about the Scientismology.
I want to dislike him but I can't do it.
Top Gun isn’t in San Diego anymore.
Moved it to Nevada when the Marine Corps took over Miramar. That was 30 years ago.
And the F-14 was retired 16 years ago in 2006.
And, lest we forget, this is one of the many movies kowtowing to Communist China.
Support slavery, go see this one.
Generally, the way all of Hollywood is kowtowing by simply making money or is there something specific like they include a Chinese nationalist among the American military elite for diversity reasons or they made an alternate ending for the Chinese market where all the planes crash because Maverick was too reckless?
Apparently they took the Taiwan flag off the back of Maverick's bomber jacket that he wears in a handful of scenes. At least that's the only thing I know of (haven't seen the movie yet, but plan to go tomorrow).
Per another reviewer:
That was Independence Day 2
I always see every Hollywood blockbuster because I support Israel.
"It's a better film than the first Top Gun, released 36 years ago this month"
Blasphemy!
At least he didn't say the remake of Red Dawn was better than the original.
(You walk out of this movie feeling a sudden need for a fun radio handle of your own.)
My friends call me "Hot Sauce", I have a friend I call "Sugar Bear".
This is not an especially compelling plot element, in part because Teller isn't an especially compelling actor.
YOU'RE NOT A COMPELLING ACTOR!
Too bad about McGillis... but let's be real, if you want to be called back in 30 years, take care of yourself.
At the same time, kudos to her for at least being seemingly amicable about it rather than going all 'privileged female in an age and body-shaming patriarchy'/'I don't exist to be eye candy for your adolescent male fantasy' about it.
Oh absolutely. There's no hate directed at McGillis at all. In fact, before this movie, I occasionally wondered what happened to her as an actress, but wasn't invested enough to look her up. But now that I'm actually bothering to look her up, looks like she gets the occasional TV role so good on her. I mean, let's face it, we can't all be Tom Cruise or Jennifer Connelly.
I actually laughed when she said "Because I'm old and fat" when asked why she wasn't brought back. I can at least appreciate when an actor shows some self-awareness.
...and apparently happy with who she is.
Not a fan of Cruise but I find him hard to dislike especially when he does something like insisting on bringing back Val Kilmer.
36 yrs ago? Crap, I'm old as f**k!
Pavlov smiles.