The Inevitable #MeToo Allegation Against Elon Musk Is Weak
It seems like an ambiguous episode that was handled appropriately.

Ever since he announced plans to purchase Twitter, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has become the main character of the current political moment. His increasingly rightward shift—he declared earlier this week that he would be voting Republican for the first time in his life—has won him tremendous loyalty from conservative media and politicians, as well as predictable backlash from Team Blue.
The two political tribes need clearly defined heroes and villains, and with former President Donald Trump out of the picture (at least for now), Musk was a clear candidate to fill that role. So, now we have right-wing media personality Benny Johnson applauding "based" and "Red Pilled" Musk, while liberal voices in the mainstream lament his turn toward "supervillain" status and Twitter's progressive content moderators shed tears at the idea of him taking over.
Given this reality, it does feel somewhat inevitable that Musk would receive new scrutiny by mainstream media figures, with special attention paid to his younger years—Was he a racist in high school? The answer, unequivocally, is no—and any embarrassing sexual scenarios.
On Thursday, Business Insider reported that Musk had propositioned a flight attendant for sex in 2016 and paid her $250,000 to keep the incident quiet after she threatened him with a lawsuit. Musk has denied the underlying allegation.
Predictably, conservatives are rallying to his defense, largely by disputing the suspicious timing of the allegation: Various Fox News personalities are asserting (not wrongly) that liberals are desperate to dig up dirt on Musk. Meanwhile, left-leaning political figures and media personalities are describing the allegations as "credible," though they were never litigated in court.
The only thing less surprising than Elon Musk declaring he's a Republican is knowing that he made that declaration as a way to fight credible allegations of sexual predation.https://t.co/vKoZK4o6TV
— The Mary Sue (@TheMarySue) May 20, 2022
The victim has not come forward publicly; Business Insider's story is based on information provided by the victim's friend, which included a declaration signed by the friend in support of the victim's claims. According to her, the victim was a flight attendant on Musk's private jet. She eventually sought training to become a masseuse, allegedly because she was told that this would please Musk. SpaceX does offer massage therapy as a perk to employees, as Business Insider noted in a previous article that did not frame the practice as sinister.
The flight attendant arrived at Musk's room on the jet to perform a "full body massage." Musk was naked except for a sheet covering his lower half. According to the declaration:
During the massage, the declaration says, Musk "exposed his genitals" and then "touched her and offered to buy her a horse if she would 'do more,' referring to the performance of sex acts."
The attendant, who rides horses, declined and continued with the massage without engaging in any sexual conduct. The attendant "is not for sale," the friend's declaration said. "She is not going to perform sexual favors for money or gifts." The incident occurred during a flight to London.
According to the friend, the flight attendant said she was punished for refusing the offer: Her employment opportunities were curtailed, and she eventually contacted an attorney.
"The attendant's complaint was resolved quickly after a session with a mediator that Musk personally attended," Business Insider reported. "The matter never reached a court of law or an arbitration proceeding."
Musk paid the flight attendant $250,000 in exchange for her agreeing not to file a lawsuit or publicize her claims.
The friend's decision to come forward was seemingly done without the victim's consent. The victim's lawyer urged her not to provide a copy of the declaration to the media, according to Business Insider, but she went ahead with it anyway.
We are thus once again in the position of trying to adjudicate a fraught sexual incident that did not rise to the level of criminal behavior and was settled quickly. It would be hard for an objective person to state with any certainty whether the incident took place as described. It's not particularly damning that Musk was exposed during a full body massage being performed by someone who was in fact a massage therapist. If he propositioned her for sex, was turned down, and then punished her for it, that would indeed be very bad conduct. But all we know for certain is the two parties disagree about what happened and nevertheless came to a resolution on their own: a $250,000 payment in exchange for silence.
Business Insider is trying to get as much mileage out of this story as they can; they published a follow-up, "Elon Musk was dating Amber Heard and finalizing a divorce around the time he's said to have sexually harassed a SpaceX flight attendant." This piece didn't provide any additional evidence that the interaction happened the way the flight attendant's friend described, though its clear purpose is to make readers wonder whether Musk's romance troubles would have made him more likely to take advantage of an employee. (Heard is currently involved in a #MeToo episode of her own.)
Absent additional claims against Musk, this seems like an ambiguous episode that was handled appropriately, and there aren't really any conclusions to draw from it. In a world where so many mindless partisans want to treat Musk as either a god-king or Thanos, that's probably unsatisfying: His new friends on the Republican side want to vindicate and excuse his every action, and his new friends on the Democratic side want to bury him.
But we don't have a fair system for re-litigating every uncomfortable interaction between two human beings after the salience of one or the other suddenly increases, and that's just as well. The takeaway here should probably be a reminder that under the progressive norm of automatically believing victims, President Joe Biden must be considered a rapist who should be immediately removed from office. That norm is silly and should be discarded, of course. Similarly, there's not much to make of the #MeToo-ing of Musk.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
His increasingly rightward shift
He was ejected from the spacecraft and is drifting off into space to the right.
As opposed to listing lazily to the left. Like Harrison Ford.
+1
Meetoo only affects rich guys, huh, go figure.
Yeah, loser Nazi assholes like you aren't worth it.
So it’s only worth caring about if you can capitalize on the endeavor. Just like america.
I heard from my old roommates second cousin who's friend worked for Biden that he.... Wait anything bad I put here that defame Biden will be true
Like him raping his daughter Ashley in the shower when she was ten years old. Something she wrote about in her diary.
Unbelievable, isn't it.
The media establishment lost its shit when Orange Hitler bragged about how hot his kids were. Can you imagine if they found out he was taking showers with Ivanka when she was a teen?
But Joe's daughter writes it in her sex diary and calls them "inappropriate" and nothing but crickets.
A diary that Veritas couldn't verify. At least some people (myself included) believe that it was a deliberate plant to undermine them by tricking them into publishing false and disprovable data.
Has it ever been proven false or dis-proven? If so could you please link to that. If not could you please explain the difference between President Trump making a statement and the MSM exploding in a whirlwind of coverage and speculation, and the diary revelation and...nothing. Also, if it indeed was so easily dis-provable, why send in the DOJ/FBI with predawn raids while informing other MSM and releasing non-related attorney-client information to the media?
Biden lawyers and the FBI demanding that they give it back to Ashley, is the gold certificate of verification.
"...At least some people (myself included) believe that it was a deliberate plant to undermine them..."
Lefty shit outs himself.
East shit and die, asshole.
What? I’ve never heard that. That’s fucked up. You’d think someone would have reported it so me, a left leaning libertarian, could see it and make a determination on its credibility, This is why we need DHS to sort the truth for us.
It doesn't matter - Biden literally went through his own MeTwo moment and the D's all told the woman to shut the fuck up, no one cared.
Democrats really are desperate criminal ghouls. When the mob turns on them I look forward to the horrors that will be inflicted on them.
The Miami Herald is having a meltdown in how Biden has thrown Florida Democrats under the bus for supporting Communist dictators in Cuba and Venezuela. This considering Hispanics have recently turned against Democrats in the largest percentages ever polled. Gotta love it. Biden’s handlers are clueless elites.
“Biden abandons Florida Dems in tough races to run a fool’s errand in Cuba, Venezuela”
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/fabiola-santiago/article261593072.html
'Biden’s handlers are clueless elites.' This describes the vast majority of left-leaning sorts, and nearly every leftist and progressive.
I really can't describe them as "elite" in any sense at all. They're incompetent, snotty little communist scum.
-jcr
I love how they are still pushing the narrative that labeling Democrats socialists or communists is a false smear. They have literal socialists in Congress who belong to the party, and several more socialist running for office. It isn't a smear it's going by who came in second the last two presidential primaries and what the squad describe themselves as.
“We will take America without firing a shot ... we will bury you! We can’t expect the American people to jump from capitalism to communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have communism. We do not have to invade the United States, we will destroy you from within.”
Nikita Khrushchev, soviet premier
Elected leaders is where your commie went wrong.
How’s Spokane traitor?
How's Jigoku, psycho?
What’s Jigoku?
Liar
Same place as Gehenna.
Sorry I’m not up on the fascist lingo
"fascist lingo"
Ha-ha, it's retarded.
This coming from the guy who has called multiple times for genocide.
KAR that is.
Fucking idiot.
I’m not going to waste my time googling your fascist lingo.
And, fortunately, since you are incapable of typing more than a sentence, no one here has to waste much time on your drivel, shit-pile.
East shit and die, asshole.
With friends like these...
Yeah that’s dumb dude. Divide and conquer got a hold of you good. What if, and I’m just throwing this out there, but what if those liberals were all bots on twitter and the rest of the compromised media / social media?
Dumbass
Elon had a brilliant retort. Since we men know all too well the physical description of our genitals, as in curvatures, proportions, marks, moles, unique identifying features, surgical scars, etc, Elon’s challenge was ingenious. If she did see his johnson, she can provide the identifying features.
Umm sideways smile crouching in a bush is a pretty generic description unless the guy runs a weed whacker around the base as well as up the trunk. And I am a red-pilled Musk fan, but I'm going to hazard a guess that 99+% would never tattoo it (having several tattoos elsewhere on my body, I shudder at the pain and bleeding that would entail) and while scars are always a possibility, who's going to verify it. And how so that it's believable. Moles/freckles are most believable but probably least memorable.
Once it gets into the 6-9 inch range, the pain isn’t as sensitive. Pussy.
"Can we please call it a tallywhacker?"
https://youtu.be/9DXjiNe_jj8
“His increasingly rightward shift”
That’s not what’s happening, Robbie.
I think sarcasmic posted this originally, or at least was where I saw it, but the cartoon seems both funny and accurate to me:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10764647/Elon-Musk-hints-hes-shifted-political-right-14-years.html
Do the journalist reporting on that not understand that the guy in the middle didn’t move, the liberal just dragged the line so far to the left that the poor schmuck is on the right side of the middle line?
Clearly not. But, to be fair, journalists almost never understand the subjects they are reporting on.
That's why they are journalists and not tech billionaires working to colonize Mars.
Wow, how clueless do you have to be to not understand that drawing?
...rightward shift...
Just like your hair, Rico. Fix it. We hold you to a higher standard.
The Inevitable
I was literally counting the days, dude.
A stop watch would have probably been all that was required.
His increasingly rightward shift—he declared earlier this week that he would be voting Republican for the first time in his life
Getting off the west-bound runaway train is now a "rightward shift".
Albert Einstein: Musk's 'red shift' is no longer as bright as it was a couple of years ago.
How long until The Left declares that the color blue has shifted redward as they embrace ionizing radiation?
Wave-particle duality is just a social construct. What harm could possibly come from allowing a growing number of individual particles deciding (all by themselves, totally not socially) to convert themselves to wave energy?
The two political tribes need clearly defined heroes and villains, and with former President Donald Trump out of the picture (at least for now), Musk was a clear candidate to fill that role.
My local rag still has multiple Trump stories on the front page... now they've just added Elon.
The selective parsing/memory-holing of this and the above comment is rather telling.
Both tribes need heroes and villains and all these (WJ) Clinton Democrats and members of the billionaire eco-warrior elite keep drifting Rightwards because Republicans keep looking around and saying, "We don't keep enough villains in our good company."
Would you like to have sex?
I'M SUING YOU!!11!
For $250,000? I respect sex-work.
He hit on her during a massage. Big deal. If it even happened. Never underestimate the ability of the left to lie about everything.
*Famous billionaire comes in*
"Nice weather, huh?"
(OMG, I think he wants me)
Did I say horse?
I meant house.
So he didn’t touch her at all. Didn’t look at her wrong. But did offer a horse (and who wouldn’t want a horse?) in exchange up front for a full body massage with happy ending that she signed up for.
Sounds like she had dollar signs the whole time. Fucking bitch.
The Mary Sue
Please be patient, I have a blue checkmark.
The shift is Democrats sliding left at breakneck speed. These are probably the same people that measure tide levels up and down the Atlantic coast, get different measures of "sea level rise" from cities just a few hundred miles apart alongside the same ocean, and panic, instead of recognizing that the land is subsiding or rising at different rates, and any "sea level rise" is entirely relative and climate change has nothing o do with the relative changes.
Reason editors don't notice, because they're part of the progressive group that is shifting leftward. So everybody to the right of Bernie Sanders is a far right terrorist.
Speaking of sea level change, how do you measure the difference in level of the ocean? Most of the stories I've seen attribute differences in sea level in the range of 2-4 inches. It's my understanding that to measure sea level you measure wave crest and wave trough and arrive at a median average between the two. I realize that by repeating that several hundred times under identical circumstances you could get a pretty good approximation, but measurements are being taken in real time/real world. Nothing stays the same, from temperature, air pressure, weather, currents, lunar position, *nothing*. At best you get decent approximations, but the amount of change falls far far below the parameters of measurement. If someone else can enlighten me, I'd appreciate it.
Ok did what I should have done prior to above post and researched on the internet. Also above the 2-4 inches is more like 2 millimeters. So I'll know better now.
Well, we can measure it by comparing actual social/cultural results compared to the predictions, regardless of the physical measurements.
Mann, at one point claimed to an interviewer that NYC's Riverside Drive would be underwater by X date. That date passed with horns still blaring; the interviewer walked back the date "if so-and-so" happened. It didn't; the horns sound to this day.
Archeology tells us we do not need to measure certain issues in 3 dimensions; perhaps the fourth is sufficient: Mann is full of shit.
She always paid her share of dinners, movies, and other outings? Never accepted rides, always drove herself or got her own taxi or Uber? Never accepted flowers or chocolates?
Let's add, never abusive, passive aggressive, never changed her mind after the fact -though, to be fair, in the new feminist doctrine, consent can be revoked hours, days, months or years later.
Oh, AFAICT she got paid to keep her mouth shut just like any other prostitute.
Well, some get paid to open their mouths.
You're right. I forgot Christine Blasey-Ford.
What about her horse?
She draws the line at full body massages to rich people on private flights.
This friend of hers sounds a lot like that cia dyke that lives at the beach with her friend while she makes me too allegations from fifty years ago against kavanaugh. What was her name again? Dr blasey ford.
Here, let me help you with some context:
'His new friends on the Republican side want to vindicate and excuse his every action' (being as this is no different than every other recent politically convenient allegation brought again people who drive the left insane),
'and his new friends on the Democratic side want to bury him' (because this is their latest dishonest tactic to try and destroy the lives and careers of people who drive the left insane).
Hitch is in agreement.
Let Musk announce that, after comparing platforms, he has decided to vote libertarian and hear Gee-Oh-Peee screeches straight out of "Invasion of The Body Snatchers"
Cite please.
The friend's decision to come forward was seemingly done without the victim's consent.
Is that friend with or without benefits?
So hearsay?
Really?
That's it?
Does Elon get his money back?
And the accuser's politics/timing is not to be questioned, because the accuser is powerless, a nobody? Who makes these rules?
Who was hurt? Who suffered? Who is worse off? Who is complaining? No victim, no foul!
Who makes "rules" for the rule makers?
AFAICT, the only person who actually took any action that wasn't theirs to take and without anybody's consent was 'the friend'.
"...Business Insider's story is based on information provided by the victim's friend,.."
BI peddling lefty hearsay?! NO!!!!!!
That would be as surprising as finding the NYT lying...
It is apparently an act of tribalism for us to endear ourselves to a center left innovator who acquired Twitter to be more friendly to 1A. Some right wing guy calling Elon "redpilled" is OUR equivalent of the left smearing him as a threat to democracy.
What will it take for Reason to realize that while both sides can be equally bad on any number of issues, the left poses a unique and pressing threat to the nation and libertarianism alike? Look at how these lunatics form mobs to intimidate judges, politicians and private citizens the milisecond things don't go their way. Did conservatives burn down cities when gay marriage and pot was legalized?
No model of government can exist in anarchy. Elon's vision of Twitter allows consenting dults to behave freely in private space within certain parameters. To that the left said "F-YOU, you better regulate your Twitter to OUR standards, even though we gleefully told conservatives that private companies have to the right to run TOS"
They're crazy people. 8 months ago they either didn't believe in inflation or thought it was actually good. "The government should just pay for rent to prevent evictions!" This is not some fringe, they run 90% of the economy, finances, education, entertainment, tech, etc. If they could, they would shut down every oil drill and pipeline and prioritize supplies to the protected class.
JANUARY SIXTH!JANUARY SIXTH!JANUARY SIXTH!JANUARY SIXTH!JANUARY SIXTH!JANUARY SIXTH!JANUARY SIXTH!
What was it like January seventh?
Bodies in the streets, smoldering fires throughout the city centers, police and fire services totally cowed, politicians hanging from lampposts all over the place - - - -
Don't you remember?
Well said. Reason editors cannot see the left's unique threat because Reason editors are mostly a bunch of actual progressives pretending to be Libertarians.
At this point I think Musk should get his $250k back.
He paid for silence. He didn't get it. That sucks.
This is America, and in America, if something sucks, you're supposed to be able to get your money back!
These agreements frequently are two-way streets. Musk may have violated the agreement by claiming he did nothing wrong. Plus it is shit-rate conduct to pubzlicize claims about what happened while the other party is muzzled. But what should we expect from a lying, antisocial, reckless, autistic misfit?
I won’t call anyone here a pedo guy, however, because what kind of adult would even think of doing that?
Every white dude is a pedo - didn’t you get the memo?
"Predictably, conservatives are rallying to his defense, largely by disputing the suspicious timing of the allegation"
CONSERVATIVES RALLY!
I look forward to the rich progtards around here dumping their Teslas. I should now be able to get a good deal on a used one.
I hope one's a Model S Plaid owner.
I was in Montecito recently and good god the amount of Teslas on the streets. Wonder if their conscience will let them keep driving one when a bad R made them
Sounds like the conservatives are "pouncing"!!! Oh the horror!!!
So, first, we don't know that, in fact, anyone actually told Business Insider anything. The only thing we have for that is Business Insider's unsupported word. It is not unprecedented for reporters to make shit up.
Then, second, of course, assuming this source exists, we don't know that this source actually knows anybody who ever was on a plane with Elon Musk, or that any of the alleged documents provided by the source were authentic. It is not unprecedented for reporters to get conned by bullshit artists.
Then, third, assuming that the source exists and isn't a bullshit artist, we don't know that the flight attendant didn't make all this up from nothing, figuring she could leverage the fact that she spent time alone with Musk into a payday.
So, after all of those hurdles are overcome, we have to assume that not only did the flight attendant correctly recall the details of the encounter accurately and with the proper emphasis and context after two years of normal memory drift and in the context of having become disenchanted with her job, but then that was correctly transmitted through the game of Telephone that was first transmission through the friend and then through the reporter.
And yet somehow the American legal system doesn't let you simply write off anyone calling the allegations "credible" as brain dead and immediately harvest their organs for transplant? Really?
"...t is not unprecedented for reporters to make shit up..."
"B-I", the claimed 'business' equivalent of "Star"; should be sold at grocery stores at check-out aisles nationwide.
----------------------------
"Really?"
Yes, really,
Haven't they tried this with Trump "the pussy grabber", Kavenaugh the dick flasher and remember Thomas with Anita Hill. The whiney fuck-wits on the left are getting desperate.
The walls are closing in! It's the tipping point! The beginning of the end!
Who knew that a loud-mouthed, loose cannon who turned out to the best POTUS we've had for at least 100 years could have caused such mental instability on the left?
Assholes need to get hold of themselves, or eat shit and die. I'd prefer the later.
Jim Morrison couldn't make it to the Jim Morrison Film Festival in Vancouver in 1970 because some stewardess allegedly alleged he'd pawed her. But wait... wasn't there a sobbing Gee-Oh-Peee outcry about Slick Willie and a DNA test?
You mean an objective test done on objective evidence left on a physical dress? Not a verbal story countered by another verbal story with no witnesses?
Bubba wasn't in trouble for spoogeing on the fat groupie whore's dress, he was in trouble for lying about it under oath. The Democrats disgraced themselves by failing to remove him from office for it, but at least the son of a bitch got disbarred for it.
Of course, if we had a functioning justice system, Bubba would be serving a life sentence for murdering Rickey Ray Rector to pretend he cared about crime.
-jcr
"he was in trouble for lying about it under oath."
Hell, that's the part of it the Democrats want people to remember. The part they want people to forget is that he had the White House staff going around collecting and destroying evidence, and suborning perjury from witnesses, in multiple cases.
The Monica Lewinsky thing wasn't remotely the only Clinton sex scandal, in fact it was arguably the least scandalous, he was facing multiple allegations including outright rape. Contemporaneous allegations, not somebody suddenly bringing up something that supposedly happened decades earlier.
He was only following in JFK's footsteps.
Most people couldn’t care less about allegations of sexual impropriety as long as the president is keeping the country running smoothly.
Pussy grabbing is pretty funny and to be expected of rich people.
“Predictably, conservatives are rallying to his defense, largely by disputing the suspicious timing of the allegation: Various Fox News personalities are asserting (not wrongly) that liberals are desperate to dig up dirt on Musk.”
You know, it could just be that they have principles.
Everybody here knows republicans have principles: war on plants, economy-destroying asset forfeiture looting, no-knock raids, qualified immunity for thugs, girl-bullying Lebensborn eugenics, altruism justifies the initiation of force, vices are crimes, racial collectivism... and don't forget how God planted Crashes and Depressions in the wake of Drug Wars to test our Faith in His Divine Will Business Cycles.
Would you like some vinegar and oil on your Word Salad? Or would you prefer some Russian Disinformation Dressing?
Somebody sell this sockpuppet a dictionary.
girl-bullying Lebensborn eugenics,
Margaret Sanger was a Democrat, you pinhead.
-jcr
And seriously, how is it even a question that boat sidez!!!1!1! are equally shitty? It should be plainly obvious to anyone with half a brain that the Democrats are balls to the wall, crazy banana pants.
Should? The only difference is that God's Own Pussy-grabbers were stupid enough to declare war on women and on the original LP platform. Republicans arranged every, repeat, every ghastly crash and depression (except 1837--when China told English opium sellers to leave). Yet they have the chutzpah to pretend that shoot-first prohibitionism is free trade laissez-faire capitalism. Only Dem ignorance helps mask republican incompetence, superstition and pseudoscience. LP for me.
"...Absent additional claims against Musk, this seems like an ambiguous episode that was handled appropriately, ...."
Wait, what?
I too doubt there is any truth in the story at all, but in what world is paying a large sum of money for silence appropriate?
In any potential juror's mind, where there's smoke there's fire.
Sexual harrassment allegations are handled this way all the time in the corporate world. Settling out of court saves both sides a lot of time and embarrassment. The "unwanted sexual advances" standard leaves a lot of room for interpretation, since it's not always clear if the advances were unwanted until after they're made.
Offering to pay someone for sex is a crime in most places, however. If the employee is really not for sale, she could try to press charges.
Richest man in the world. Worth hundreds of billions of dollars. $250,000 pay out. That's like me giving the homeless guy a buck to leave me the fuck alone.
It's 0.00011% of his estimated net worth. If you add my salary, my assets and my retirement plan, one dollar is about 0.001 percent of my wealth. So in reality it's would be more accurate to say it's like me giving a dime to a homeless person to make them go away.
Is there any proof that Musk paid a settlement?
After the flurry of totally bogus sex crime allegations invented by a partisan media during the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, and described at the time by them as "credible", there is no reason to accept this as anything other than a completely fabricated hit piece.
And the key evidence of this falsehood: like the "gang rape" allegations made against Kavanaugh, it was all coming from third parties with no first hand knowledge.
Like GOP attacks on Ross Perot's family when he sought to defend the economy rather than kick in doors and shoot dogs, hippies, latinos and blacks over plant leaves? That kind of partisan attacks?
Where has this happened? Cite actual examples during that time or shut the hell up.
Search the google news archive yourself or find the news clipping in the libertariantranslator archive. Izzis the same literacy-challenged sockpuppet everybody muted as Truthteller?
So you have no example. Now shut the hell up.
Reason editors described Kavanaugh's accuser as "credible" from day one. Never turned away from the progressive narrative. But Tara Reid, crickets.
No sooner had mild-mannered Ross Perot challenged Drug Czar Holy War Bush and Epstein Patron Slick Willie than the Kleptocrazies began gluing up posters to the effect that Perot had ALWAYS been a traitorous tool of Eurasian atheistic communism and at war with peaceful, democratic, Allah-fearing, girl-bullying Oceamurrica. Libertarian party vote share increased a thousandfold with pro-choice Gary. Musk could have had the chutzpah to vote libertarian or at least clear the LNC of saboteurs. But noooooo....
Johnson didn't hit 3% because he was pro-choice. He hit 3% because he was the best qualified candidate (a two-term governor) and his two main opponents were widely despised. If he had kept up with current events he might have hit 5%.
Can he do us all a favor and just get out of our faces for awhile?
This guy needs and demands more attention than Trump. Maybe if the deal falls thru Twitter can ban him.
And yet when people ask, tell, yell, spit etc. for you to go away, you always return. Rules for me but not for thee?
Do not engage Joe Asshole; simply reply with insults.
Not a one of his posts is worth refuting; like turd he lies and never does anything other than lie. If something in one of Joe Asshole’s posts is not a lie, it is there by mistake. Joe Asshole lies; it's what he does.
Joe Asshole is a psychopathic liar; he is too stupid to recognize the fact, but everybody knows it. You might just as well attempt to reason with or correct a random handful of mud as engage Joe Asshole.
Do not engage Joe Asshole; simply reply with insults; Joe Asshole deserves nothing other.
Good job, Robby. Disaffected, autistic, antisocial, obsolete clingers need to stick together, especially with respect to those "awkward situations" that develop among people who don't know how to interact with modern American human beings.
Oh, gee! Asshole bigot shows up to claim the losing end of a debate once more.
Eat shit and die, asshole.
Dems doubling down on Amber Heard's victim BS as of recently (which anyone with a brain can see through) and them basically demonizing a woman who made claims against their presidential candidate of choice, has MeToo in the same bucket as the other woke overreach
Normal people are over it, it had its moment, it took full advantage and pushed itself into a massive over-correction, and its going to get backlash as a result.
If indeed Musk propositioned this woman, and if indeed after her refusal he curtailed her opportunities, that is still *not* harassment. Harassment is unremitting interference with a person's usual pursuit of their daily routines as a way to extort compliance, concessions, favors, or other goods that the harasser desires to have from the harassed who refuses to fulfill those desires as is their right. Sexual harassment is such unremitting interference as a way to extort sexual favors.
It is important that reasonable people not cede conceptual territory to progressives because one of their great weapons for social sanction is to extend the scope of words denoting any sort of evil to encompass acts that ordinarily count as simple infractions, lapses, or offenses against taste and decorum that reflect clashes in sensibility and sensitivity. It is not a crime to be boorish; it is not a crime not to want to continue to employ someone who has seen one's boorishness revealed.
On Thursday, Business Insider reported that Musk had propositioned a flight attendant for sex in 2016
Is there a legal crime or moral problem with propositioning someone for sex? how did all these humans get here anyway?
These days mostly they're not, if you've looked at the birth rate recently.
I wonder if Mr. Soave can justify his use of “the victim” rather than “the accuser”. Isn’t Mr. Musk the victim?
They will all be sad when Elon doesn’t give a fuck.
The timing isn’t suspicious at all.
https://babylonbee.com/news/ninja-level-move-elon-musk-switches-back-to-democrat-party-sexual-harassment-accusation-withdrawn
Humans are no better than chimps. Anyone from my tribe, who smells like me and lets me pick (and eat) bugs from their fur, can do no wrong. Anyone from another tribe is a murderous heathen and must be cancelled, figuratively or literally (looking at you, Billary).
Yes, don’t forget that we also are absolutely, without exception, become exponentially worse with more power given to us. Eventually, we would all get to a point where a large slice of the population needs to be genocided if we had that much power. Humans suck. The only way to save the species is to genetically engineer the stupid out of us, or let AI be god.
What, no rape aligations from underage prostitutes trying to make their name in the catholic mafia dope game and who drugged him until they could entrap the rape case in the first place?
Pfft. Loser.
It was his South African accent at fault. He didn't offer to buy her "a horse", he said that if she was not interested in men he would buy her "whores". She just misunderstood the offer on the table.
It seems that this woman now owes Musk 250K. She's worse than a whore, a whore will keep her mouth shut about her clients.
Not when coerced. Mabel Willebrandt was appointed federal prosecutor by Republican Warren Harding (he of wife and at least three mistresses) after she got working girls indictments dismissed by sending rich rich customers subpoenas to testify. She later exposed the workings of Prohibition and the Crash began while her syndicated column aired in 21 newspapers. Moral: You can't have someone else's pussy and ban it too.
New target - same playbook. You'd think they would at least mix it up so it's not so obvious!!