Pennsylvania Voters Rejected the Political Establishment in Tuesday's Primaries
But the pitched battle for the GOP Senate nomination in the Keystone State is still too close to call.

The two clear winners of Tuesday's contested primaries in Pennsylvania have something in common. They're outsiders from the traditional political power structures, embraced by voters who are fed up with those structures and with the increasingly useless—perhaps even impotent—party establishments.
But not every race has a clear winner, including the most highly anticipated race in the state. As Tuesday drew to a close, television personality Mehmet Oz and former hedge fund CEO David McCormick were running neck-and-neck with about 31 percent of the vote apiece in the seven-way contest for the Republican senatorial nomination.
Because of a screw-up involving mail-in ballots in Lancaster County that will require thousands of those votes to be counted by hand, final results are unlikely to be known for at least a few days. The race could be headed for a recount, which is automatically triggered if the gap between the top two candidates is less than 0.5 percent.
Oz and McCormick reportedly spent a combined $20 million on ads in the race, many of them attacking each other. Neither has held elected office before, and both dodged allegations of being carpetbaggers: Oz is from New Jersey but says he lives at his in-laws' home in the Philadelphia suburbs, while McCormick is a resident of Connecticut.
Whichever candidate eventually emerges from that Republican slugfest will head into a general election matchup against Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, the tattooed progressive from coal country who easily prevailed over Rep. Conor Lamb, the well-coiffed establishment candidate who once looked like an obvious frontrunner. Fetterman wants to legalize weed and reduce prison sentences. Less appealingly, he has advocated abolishing the filibuster in order to ram more progressive policies through the Senate.
Fetterman's win was not without controversy. He suffered a stroke on Friday, but his campaign kept the news under wraps until Sunday, which raises questions about both Fetterman's health and his willingness to be transparent with voters. Fetterman had a pacemaker installed earlier on Election Day, according to The Philadelphia Inquirer. He's expected to remain in the hospital for the next few days.
Hanging in the balance of all may be nothing less than control of the U.S. Senate. Pennsylvania is a crucial swing state with an open Senate seat at a time when the U.S. Senate is split 50–50 between the two parties. Both sides will be charting their paths to 51 Senate seats through the Keystone State, and that means Fetterman and either Oz or McCormick are about to become two of the most well-known politicians in the country.
The state has an open gubernatorial race this year too—incumbent Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, is term-limited and ineligible to run again—and the governor gets to appoint the person who will oversee the 2024 election in the state. (Unlike many other states, Pennsylvania's secretary of state is not an elected position.)
That's significant because the winner of the Republican gubernatorial primary, state Sen. Doug Mastriano, was endorsed by former President Donald Trump and previously attended the January 6, 2021, protest at the U.S. Capital after Trump's defeat. Mastriano claims that he did not participate in the riot and that he walked away from the scene once violence started. That said, photos and videos from the scene show Mastriano beyond police barricades outside the Capitol, though no evidence has emerged that he entered the building itself. He has been subpoenaed by the congressional committee investigating the riot.
Opposing Mastriano in that contest will be the state's current attorney general, Josh Shapiro. Shapiro was running unopposed in the Democratic primary on Tuesday—but even that wasn't enough to prevent last-minute drama, as Shapiro tested positive for COVID-19 on Tuesday.
In Fetterman and Mastriano, Pennsylvania voters from both major parties issued clear signals about rejecting the establishment in favor of candidates who promise dramatic changes even at the risk of more chaotic politics. Fetterman's victory over Lamb (and the ease of it) probably says as much about the direction of the Democratic Party in a swing state like Pennsylvania as Mastriano's win does about the Republican Party remaining under Trump's thrall. Both won on the basis of their appeal to voters who hate politics as usual.
Tuesday in Pennsylvania was crazy—and the craziness will continue into Wednesday. And then it's going to get even weirder over the next five months.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
November will be fun.
Because of a screw-up involving mail-in ballots
That's right, totally by accident.
As always, there were no good choices.
What we need is an enforceable None of the Above option.
What I mean by enforceable is that None of the Above can win the election and if that happens a new election is held and all candidates from the first election that lost to None of the Above are barred from running in the new election.
Can we go further and if None of the above wins then all votes are automatically cast as no for the entirety of their term?
What I mean by enforceable is that None of the Above can win the election and if that happens a new election is held and all candidates from the first election that lost to None of the Above are barred from running in the new election.
Not to disagree with your overall point, but this sounds like 'enforcement by kicking the can'. What happens when we get to the end of a/the road(s) and actually have to enforce something? The obviously unclear path is "Is NOTA available in the subsequent elections and, if so, what happens if they (don't) win?"
I've had a similar idea. Someone should need like 67% of the vote to win an elected office, and if no one gets it they run it again with a new batch of candidates until someone that has modestly 'broad' appeal wins.
no more of this 50%+1 crap.
oh it'd be terrible if those positions went unfilled for any length of time. the horror!
Not at all. It's 50-50 now, and the GOP would have to embrace Kamala to not win a few seats in November.
Arizona and Georgia both look doable. Nevada is another possibility. The cratering of Democrats among Hispanics really hurts them in the American west. They also are less likely if polling is to be believed to carry 90+% of blacks. As much as people hate Trump, he did make a concerted effort to reach out to minority communities and the party has stayed with that, focusing on working class, regardless of color. Hispanics work heavily in the petroleum industry in the western states. Hispanics and blacks have been disproportionately impacted by inflation and crime increases, the Democrats obtuseness regarding these issues are making many reconsider their political alliances. Social issues also aren't likely to help, with two of the most religious ethnic groups in America, especially if the Democrats focus on social issues over bread and butter (and gas) issues. Also, it turns out Hispanics really don't like open borders or being labeled Latinx.
Oh and their abortion vote stunt looks like it is backfiring, as people become aware that it was far more than guaranteeing access to abortion. That instead it was a blatant attempt to codify some of the most extreme abortion positions, including removing protections from medical personal who refuse to assist in abortions on religious and moral grounds, a protection that was signed into law by Bill Clinton.
I saw a commercial on multiple tv news channels in the last 48 hours that pushed that point directly. I wonder how many Senate seats Schumer's stunt will cost his party.
I would love to see the democrats lose control of California. If that happened, they would burn the whole state to the ground in a massive Marxist tantrum.
Just for the record, the Republicans actually hold the senate.
There are 50 Republicans, only 48 Democrats, and 2 independents.
The alleged tie is just the final act of the 2020 election frauds.
You are wrong. Both independents vote/caucus with the Democrats.
The majority of the Senate is Republican.
You are wrong. Both independents vote/caucus with the Democrats.
But they ARE NOT Democrats.
If control is supposed to go to the party with the most SEATS, then the GOP should have control.
Any Senator can vote ANY way, so 'voting with' should not be a control criteria.
And, if 'voting with' is a criteria, why doesn't Manchin 'voting with' Republicans give them 51?
Or is 'voting with' only a criteria when it can be used to fuck over a Republican majority?
But they ARE NOT Democrats.
Yeah. You'd think this would be more clear and common knowledge at a site that earnestly advocates third parties, RCV, etc. Wherever that site is.
The party in control is the party that actually prevails in votes on procedural issues. That’s the democrats.
Manchin, Sinema, and the two so-called independents voted with the Democrats when it counted most, in organizing the Senate and selecting the Majority Leader. That gave a tie vote, with Harris having the tie-breaker.
“Because of a screw-up involving mail-in ballots in Lancaster County that will require thousands of those votes to be counted by hand, final results are unlikely to be known for at least a few days.”
Luckily, according to Reason’s own Matt Welch, the idea that this was an issue in 2020 is laughable, and to be sure, won’t be one in the general election.
plus the box of ballots out in the Honda ...
The big question is, if Oz pulls off the win, which looks plausible at this juncture, can he and McCormick make up? McCormick won the majority of counties, while Oz is winning the heavily populated collar counties around Philadelphia. Barrett, while the media darling the past week, seems only to have drawn off votes from Oz, without making a serious threat (polling was wrong again, showing McCormick in third with the race being between Oz and Barrett).
Another thing that will make things very interesting in Pennsylvania is that it's likely there will be two ultra progressive candidates, one for governor and one for District 12. Lee hardly seems a good fit for district 12 but if she wins the primary, it's cannon fodder for the Republicans.
Additionally, the leak of how Biden chose his ultra MAGA attacks line seems to be a major strategic blunder. Hiring a consultant and pollsters to study which attack most demonizes your opponents hardly comports well with your message that you are a uniter and the division is all your opponents fault.
Liberal strongholds in Pennsylvania means you shouldn’t waste your time thinking about statewide elections there, along with Georgia, Wisconsin, and unfortunately my state of Michigan. The necessary votes will show up as needed. Until the people that actually get caught committing voter fraud and/or illegally changing election laws face real consequences, they won’t stop. Why should they?
Washington State isn’t any better. I-5 corridor progtards run the state.
This is why PA has a red legislature but state-wide elections have gone blue.
Big blue cities Philly/Pittsburgh will do same as 2020 and try and steal it.
That don't have the control to cheat in Greensburg Somerset or Washington so they lose those elections
Lee is a communist. But that district will vote D no matter what.
Ultra MAGA makes it sound cooler. Democrats are so fucking stupid.
Seriously, how out of touch does someone have to be to need consultants and focus groups to come up with zingers?
Obviously they didn't spend enough money because it quickly turned into a meme and the right embraced it like clingers. Now, even the leftist media is warning Biden to stop using it because it's backfiring.
I love it. It pisses off the left that it’s so well received. And their tears are oh so delicious.
"Oz is from New Jersey but says he lives at his in-laws' home in the Philadelphia suburbs, while McCormick is a resident of Connecticut."
Seems like yet another reason to repeal 17A. The purpose of the Senate has been completely mangled from its original purpose.
The democrats want to repeal the entire senate.
Fetterman is a joke.
And when you give a joke like that power, the consequences are deadly.
I don't know how many of you live in PA, but I didn't vote in the R primaries. Most of the likely to win candidates feel like grifters and Mastriano vs. Shapiro will be an absolute shitshow no matter who wins. If I had to put money on a winner, I fear it will be Shapiro. Philly and Pittsburgh suburbs are dark blue now. The money and >90% white NIMBYs used to swing red sometimes, but we drank the kool aid hard on "Orange Man Bad." Shapiro will most likely carry J6 to the Gov's mansion.
The only way Shapiro loses this is if he fails to take Mastriano seriously and doesn't debate the issues, like McAuliffe vs. Youngkin. Shapiro wasn't good as AG and it's messed up that he won't step down while running for governor. The best condition working in Mastriano's favor is that this is a midterm and Trump won't be on the ballot.
Mastriano needs to copy the Youngkin playbook ASAP. Don't talk about Trump or J6, regardless of what you think about it. Talk about our daily lives in PA. Talk about:
1. how we have one of the highest gas taxes in the US.
2. how much business we lose to Delaware because of our regressive tax schemes.
3. the Philly crime wave and having the highest poverty rate in the US.
4. AG Shapiro's targeted attack on religious freedom.
5. AG Shapiro's targeted attacks on the fracking industry.
6. Biden releasing illegal immigrants into our medium sized cities.
7. I didn't list these in any particular order, but for the love of god, don't be the typical Republican that remains silent about healthcare. Talk about the hospital closures, like Hahnemann in Philly. Bernie made a lot of waves talking about local issues like that.
8. Seriously ending the PLCB.
9. School choice. Don't focus on the CRT too much, but talk about the stranglehold the teachers' unions have, major school closures in Philly, COVID policies as they relate to education, etc.
I would like to believe that voters in PA remember him defending Gov. Wolf's unconstitutional COVID measures and for being a Democrat stooge, but I wouldn't bet on it. It was obvious as AG that Shapiro wanted to be Gov and it's clear as day he isn't going to stop at Gov.
Pittsburgh burbs are not deep blue outside of Allegheny County. Westmoreland, Butler and Washington counties are pretty red.
Philly I agree.
I think your list is good. Besides Mastriano's support of Act 77 what exactly do you think is shit show about him?
I think Oz or McCormick beat Fetterman
I like how we have actively run away from the concept of sending the best and brightest to DC. Seems we would rather have a reality TV show than a functioning government.
I wouldn't know personally, but I bet a lot of Jews would've preferred to be covered in green slime and sent home with a free toaster rather than to the gas chamber.
That's what actually happened!
/Rod Mysuck
All the brainwashed kids talk about "Late Stage Capitalism," but what we are experiencing is Late Stage Federalism.
Debased people using a broken system to satisfy their craven desires while the ignorant electorate thrashes in the mud over pretend issues.
Debased people using a broken system to satisfy their craven desires while the ignorant electorate thrashes in the mud over pretend issues.
What "pretend issues," specifically? Because if this is just another complaint about "pointless culture war nonsense," that pretense doesn't apply today. The culture war is arguably far more important than any economic question, particularly because the left side of the populace is rapidly morphing marxism into a socio-religious belief system rather than a simple materialist critique of Industrial Revolution-era economic systems, and those who control the culture are the ones who determine both cultural AND economic policy.
>>candidates who promise dramatic changes
first week of Congressional Orientation includes mandatory dance class to learn Potomac Shuffle
Eric leaves out what everyone except Reason is reporting. Pennsylvania GOP is split because both their Kleptocracy candidates want government agents with guns to threaten doctors to force PA women into involuntary reproduction or coathanger abortions. Erik Gehrhardt, running as "libertarian" says nothing about whether pregnant women ought to retain the right to choose gained thanks to the 1972 and 1976 LP platforms. His campaign is ignored by Reason and The Kleptocracy.
It sure is Hank, it sure is. Now go ahead and fuck off, m’kay?
Feel free to respond, but we both know you’re too much of a scared old doddering coward to try.
was endorsed by former President Donald Trump and previously attended the January 6, 2021, protest at the U.S. Capital after Trump's defeat. Mastriano claims that he did not participate in the riot and that he walked away from the scene once violence started. That said, photos and videos from the scene show Mastriano beyond police barricades outside the Capitol, though no evidence has emerged that he entered the building itself. He has been subpoenaed by the congressional committee investigating the riot.
But just being there, man. Just being there. I mean, being there is... just... being there man.
I'm pretty sure there's photographic or video evidence showing me and probably around 200M other Americans beyond the police barricades outside the Capitol on Jan. 6th.
The only way Mastriano can win in November is if the five Conservative Catholics on SCOTUS do NOT strike down Roe v Wade (as Mastriano has said he'll sign legislation to ban ALL abortions, and the GOP controls both the PA House and Senate by wide margins).
Two widely respected moderate Republicans dropped out of the Governor's race this past weekend to prevent Mastriano from winning the election (and they endorsed Lou Barletta, who came in second)
Mastriano, like the 5 Catholic Conservatives who authored the leaded SCOTUS brief are intolerant theocratic religious extremists.
Meanwhile, Fetterman will very likely lose to either Oz or McCormick in November in the US Senate race.
It's funny how the press overlooks that Dr. Oz is Muslim. I thought Trump and Republicans were racist? Yet they may have elected one to run for Senate...
Lutheran National Socialism is not all that different from Islam. Observe that during WW2 Germany's Positive Christians as of 1920 foamed at the mouth to exterminate selfish Jews, yet say nothing about equally Semitic Arabs. There is a new 3rd Reich book out evidently written for the sole purpose of insinuating that Catholic Adolph and his Mostly Lutheran party chums were all of some pagan sect hitherto unnoticed by Germany's 96% Christian voting population, most of whom believed altruism a hereditary trait.
Yeah Hank, all Christian’s are Nazis, right?
Why don’t you just do libertarianism a favor and fucking die?
https://www.yahoo.com/now/9-best-essay-writing-services-181055581.html
I'm not sure how you can legitimately say voters rejected the political establishment when they still elected/nominated Republicans and Democrats for anything.
Yes, none of the GOP candidates for the Senate can hold a candle to Hugh Scott.
Rejected the political establishment? Eric, you must be living in a different universe from me. Oz and McCormick are both solid establishment candidates, as far as I can tell. Neither one will answer a direct question - a dead giveaway, and everything coming out of their mouths has been focus grouped.
Kathy Barnette (I voted for her) was the outsider, but she did relatively well, all things considered.
Yeah, who would have thought that people actually like deregulation, growth, fewer foreign wars, lower taxes, and a politician trying to live up to his campaign promises! People who vote for that sort of thing are obviously just mindless zombies!