Gov. Newsom Proposes Eliminating One of California's Many Marijuana Taxes
The cultivation tax has driven up the cost of growing cannabis, fueling illegal operations and the state’s enormous black market.

The latest California budget submitted by Gov. Gavin Newsom could go a long way in fixing the state's ailing recreational marijuana industry by fully eliminating an oppressive cultivation tax.
Newsom's May revisions to the 2022–23 fiscal year budget call for some significant statutory changes to the state's cannabis tax system. The biggest change would be zeroing out the cultivation taxes beginning in July. The excise tax of 15 percent would remain intact.
When Californians voted to legalize recreational marijuana cultivation and sales back in 2016, the industry ended up saddled with state and local taxes that make it inordinately costly to attempt to sell or buy cannabis legally. As a result, the black market for marijuana still dominates sales in a state where it's legal to buy it. Industry analysts estimate about $8 billion in black market marijuana sales annually in California—double the amount of marijuana purchased through licensed dispensaries.
The cultivation tax has been consistently eyed by industry analysts as a problem. This particular tax is unique among agricultural products in California, and due to the legislation passed in 2017 to establish tax authorities, it's regularly adjusted for inflation. As a result, cultivation tax rates actually increased at the start of 2022 despite this big black market problem.
The high cost of attempting to cultivate marijuana has both given cannabis farmers second thoughts and has fostered a whole new drug war as state and local law enforcement officers raid illegal grow operations out in the rural and uninhabited parts of the state. Legislators even passed a new law adding more potential criminal penalties for those arrested for "aiding and abetting" any unlicensed dealers.
The entire history of the drug war shows that increased enforcement and punishment isn't the solution. A report from Reason Foundation released earlier in May estimated that reducing some of California's excessively high marijuana taxes could result in higher legal sales and ultimately more revenue for the state. Geoffrey Lawrence, Reason Foundation's managing director of drug policy, estimates that California may see a 123 percent increase in marijuana revenue by 2024 simply by eliminating the cultivation tax.
"California's state and local taxes on legal cannabis can be as high as $90 per ounce, or $1,441 per pound, dramatically higher than other states," Lawrence wrote. "For example, taxes on legal marijuana average $340 per pound in Oregon and $526 a pound in Colorado. Those lower taxes make legal cannabis products more competitive with black market products in those states. As a result, Oregonians spend 378% more per capita on legal cannabis and Coloradoans spend 335% more per capita on cannabis than Californians spend per capita."
It's good news that Newsom is proposing eliminating the cultivation tax. He may be doing it in the hopes that the state will make more money, but California residents will also benefit from cheaper legal options. And if this makes it easier for people to grow cannabis legally, there will hopefully be fewer raids and enforcement operations in the future.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Oh, yeah. I totally would trust CA government enough to start a business there.
Anti-woke Canadian psychologist Dr. Jordan Peterson QUITS Twitter after being bombarded with a 'vicious flood of insults' for saying plus-size Sports Illustrated Swimsuit cover model Yumi Nu is 'not beautiful'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10825163/Dr-Jordan-Peterson-quits-Twitter-backlash-Sports-Illustrated-Swimsuit.html
If John was still here I'm sure he'd disagree.
OMG, scroll that article at your own risk. I wonder how many times she has to flush when she takes a crap. Got to be more than once.
Like Oam from ‘Archer’?
‘Pam’
To be honest I was expecting much worse. Though I imagine those photos have had some touching up.
I've never known someone that large without serious stretch marks. Definitely some photo magic going on. Ugh, why did I look again? I just ate.
It's bad. The sagging and cellulite show through, even with the touch ups.
Still wondering what her sport is. Not entirely sure it has any aerobic qualities to it. Golf maybe?
Checkers.
Or competitive eating.
Damn, I was gonna say that!
Hot dog! That's it!
Reaching for the remote.
I looked her up on Wikipedia. She’s the niece of Devon Aoki. Who was the hot Asian chick in several films, like 2 Fast 2 Furious and Sin City.
SI should have put Devon Aoki in the layout instead.
{LOL} You know, as a Black and gay conservative I of course recognized that the real snowflakes in modern society are Leftists, who get upset when the INS separates a 3 yo from their parents or talks about strapping a women to a gurney for 9 months to have the Baby Jesus. But, my God, the things that JP has to endure on Twitter. It would drive any person to shooting up meth in Yekaterinburg. Enough is enough and this Black and gay man has definitely had enough.
You guys are funny. Thanks for the laugh.
It’s not funny at all, Sarc! I mean, how would you react to being called a Jungian crackpot with two out of three screws loose? Why I bet you’d get yourself addicted to benzos, check yourself into a Russian psyche and addiction ward, eat a steady diet of caribou and salt and then some more caribou while being a model for masculinity to the whole world. Don’t be such a prick. There’s nothing funny about this—at all. Have some empathy!
I'm not aware of who Yumi Nu is but I won't give SI one fucking click if they're suddenly all-in on the Critical Fat Studies game.
Legislators even passed a new law adding more potential criminal penalties for those arrested for "aiding and abetting" any unlicensed dealers.
Oh good Lord. They can't even end the drug war right.
They're taxaholics.
They did warn us. The “ProgressIves” never saw “decriminalization” or legalization as an issue of individual liberty but as an means of “revenue enhancement”.
The one thing that you can count on from the morons who call themselves “progressives” today is ignorance of history.
Or at least a selective interpretation of it. Progressives don't have principles. They don't believe in right or wrong. Everything is relative and based upon who not what. It's ok for one person to do something and bad for another person to do the exact same thing because of personal attributes. That means that they learn nothing from history, because they only look at the people involved. Then they imagine that they could do better. So they try whatever it is that failed in the past, confident that it will be different this time. And when things goes badly they blame people. After all, they have good intentions. How can good intentions possibly have bad results?
"The one thing that you can count on from the morons who call themselves “progressives” today is ignorance of history."
You should have stopped at ignorance.
Meanwhile California is building a high speed train to nowhere while rapidly running out of water.
Illegal black market pot is still preferred because it's CHEAPER and EASIER to get than the legal stuff.
Back when the progressives were promoting legalization, their rallying cry was "Legalize it so we can tax the shit out of it!" Suggesting that they legalize it and only tax it at the same rate as alcohol was seen as horribly reactionary and troggish.
It’s also usually better.
As a Democrat proposes to reduce taxes, people in Hell are having snowball fights.
Reduce taxes.
That's like a mugger taking all the money from your pocket, giving $5 back, and you're supposed to thank him for the gift. It's not a reduction, it's just a little less than the absolutely excessive cost that they imposed in the first place.
They’re desperate to remain in power. Imagine if Californians got pissed off enough and decided to role the dice on republicans candidates.
Why is it good to reduce taxes on dope but not income taxes?
Or gasoline for that matter. I heard during this gas price hikes Newsom is actually proposing more gas taxes
But he wants to mail every driver $400.
If you take a bunch of it in the first place, then you can be seen as the generous benefactor giving people free money right before the elections.
The ridiculous thing is they pass these laws as if they can't see this coming. Are they really this ignorant? Maybe they pass these things this way to try to get as much as they can to start then back off a little as necessary.
It's not taxes that are primarily fueling the black market, its's the border.
The drug cartel is growing their own supply in CA. Legal pot is a huge industry and CA is one of the biggest markets in the world. The notion that legal pot would discourage their operation was pure fantasy. No state mandated costs beats less state mandated costs.
Of course, even if the borders were responsibly managed, there would be no way to kill the black market completely. But CA is a semi broken society.
When you can buy an ounce for $90 off the black market, or pay the same just in taxes to buy legal weed, the choice is pretty obvious.
Black market pot is better too.
It is happening... again.
It is happening... again.
JFree PANICS!
a stealth surge
And so we move into the "Ubiquitous Invisible Hazard" stage.
What if they had a pandemic and nobody got sick?
https://magic.ly/MaxPlay99ofc
https://magic.ly/MaxPlay99ofc
Maxplay99 merupakan situs qq slot online terpopuler dengan berbagai jenis permainan menarik yang bisa anda mainkan. Tentunya, kami hadir disini sebagai agen yang menyediakan permainan Slot Gampang Menang Indonesia. Pastinya, dengan rate kemenangan tertinggi yang ada di situs Maxplay99 akan memberikan keuntungan yang berlimpah. Bukan hanya permainan slot online saja yang bisa anda mainkan, judi bola, casino online, poker online, sabung ayam, togel online.
This d bag will do this but not repeal the enormous gas tax we suffer? But we (Not ME) voted for these idiots.
This dude will do this, but not repeal the enormous gas tax we suffer? But we (Not ME) voted for these idiots.
Probably should release a tax on pot. It isn't an addictive substance. It's not a sustainable business in a free market. It grows anywhere, you don't have to be a botanist. People buy it anywhere. People sell it anywhere. It's nearly impossible to abuse. And leads to free thinkers everywhere. Taxing that is taxing yourself. Illegalising something like that is illegalizing yourself.
It's just not going to be a big cash crop everyone thought it would be. These are the facts. It's not even worth smoking more than once a week. Making pot illegal just feeds chronic criminal culture for no reason.
but, but..... How will CA balance their deficits.... lol...
Less Tax is always a good thing.
This is why you Decriminalize instead of Legalize... so the State can't tax it, regulate it and have more power over it.
Legal Mareewauner == BAD!
Legal Mareewauner that puts more cronybucks in my pocket == GOOD!
https://www.yahoo.com/now/9-best-essay-writing-services-181055581.html
If you hear even one word out of a democrat's mouth about cutting any tax, you'd better be skeptical, and if you live in that state, that means hide the shower soap and don't bend over.
A 20-gram "lid" cost roughly $10 in SF in 1968. Pro-rata, the tax on that would be $72 but the inflation-adjusted lid would now cost $83. So if the current pre-tax price is anywhere near $11 for 88% of an ounce, it would be a wash--unless you factor in increased strength. These "sin" taxes and prohibitory tariffs were the "sumptuary laws" Dem platforms scorned when Cleveland was Prez.