Democrats Pivot to Pot for Votes. Will It Work?
It may not translate to victory in November, but increased support for marijuana legalization is a welcome change.

Four candidates are running in today's Democratic primary for Senate in Pennsylvania, and the race has gotten some coverage for its nontraditional front-runner.
Rep. Conor Lamb, who represents the state's 17th congressional district, was considered the favorite early on but has struggled against Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, a brash, 6'8 former mayor who came to prominence in 2020 for picking fights with his Republican counterparts in states that claimed the presidential election had been stolen from President Donald Trump.
Going into today's primary, Fetterman holds a comfortable lead, even after suffering a stroke over the weekend. But on one issue, Fetterman stands out from the average Democratic front-runner: legalizing marijuana.
As Politico reported today, Fetterman supports legalization; he even sells campaign T-shirts with marijuana leaves. In fact, the top three Democrats in the primary support legalization to some extent, though Lamb previously voted against a federal cannabis bill in 2020, saying last month that he thought any effort toward legalization "needs to be done slowly and very carefully."
Indeed, while Democratic lawmakers have hemmed and hawed over legalization since taking power last year, many Democratic candidates are using the issue to stand out from the pack. So far this year, two candidates for U.S. Senate—Thomas McDermott Jr. from Indiana, and Gary Chambers Jr. from Louisiana—have smoked pot in campaign ads. And in the Democratic primary for governor in Florida, the top two candidates spent the early days of the campaign arguing over who supported legalization more.
As Politico notes, this is a shrewd campaign strategy: Marijuana initiatives tend to drive turnout among younger voters, who are typically the hardest to get to show up. But this is more than just a youth issue: More than two-thirds of Americans support legalization, a record high. Even while acknowledging that the war on drugs has been a failure, President Barack Obama literally laughed at the idea of legalization and pursued prosecution of offenders as zealously as any of his predecessors during his time in office.
Even if Fetterman wins his party's nomination, he still faces a tough fight in November, as Republicans are favored to do well across the board. But the trend of Democrats (and some Republicans) who not only support legalization but openly advocate for it, is a welcome change and a sign that the issue might be moving in the right direction.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Marijuana has provided us with a great example as to how we should deal with federal laws that are misguided and flat out stupid. Negate and refuse to enforce them.
I don't disagree. Philosophically, it tickles my liberty bone.
Though the Feds have scores of law enforcement agencies of their own more than willing to take your liberty and property away if you cross them. Likewise, they can strong arm companies like banks or credit card processors to make going about your business very hard.
So yes, the states should retain all non enumerated powers, or the people. But the feds have been allowed to grow to where they'll cause you all kinds of mayhem if they want to go swinging their dick around.
Obama and Biden showed by their inaction what their priorities are.
Minute clip of Joe Biden describing his tough stance on drugs. Don't we love him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyvAMERxqog
"If you have a piece of crack cocaine, no bigger than this quarter that I'm holding in my hand... WE passed a law... A law that says if you're caught with that, you go to jail for five years. You get no probation, you get nothing other than five years in jail, judge doesn't have a choice. Under our forfeiture statutes, the government can take everything that you own. Everything from your car, to your house, to your bank account. Not merely what they confiscate in the terms of the dollars from the transaction that you just got caught engaging in. They can take everything."
And of course Reason endorsed him anyway.
I guess fighting Russia in Ukraine doesn't have the cachet it had three weeks ago.
Current thing is current.
Also, promising to legalize marijuana is what got Trudeau elected, why not Pelosi?
Ukraine is months old. New hotness is Somalia.
"Democrats Pivot to Pot for Votes" and hold hearings on UFOs while the country is swirling around the crapper. But, members of Congress can order drinks on demand...are doobies next?
Fetterman holds a comfortable lead, even after suffering a stroke over the weekend.
Hey, we can handle a brain-damaged President. But a senator?
Democrats Pivot to Pot for Votes. Will It Work?
Will voters be able to afford legalized pot by November?
everybody has already seen what government does to legalized weed. idk if a bunch of (D) getting elected is an incentive.
Sadly, no mention of all the candidates skin color, just the height of one of them.
Green Lives Matter.
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/shrek/images/9/9b/GoodShrekImage.png/revision/latest?cb=20201220080410
Do I smell a "You can keep your doctor." Moment...
If you like your bong, you can keep your bong!
If you like your mask, you can protect me. My doctor can keep you. Wait...
I haven't been keeping up with the issue - in how many states is pot now legal and in how many states is legal pot any easier or cheaper to get than black-market pot? Are there any states where buying legal weed is as easy as buying cigarettes or beer?
Yeah, I think so. In Washington it seems pretty straightforward. There are pot shops in various neighborhoods. There's even a kind of swanky upscale looking joint in my neighborhood which seems to have a lot of traffic. As for price, I couldn't say. I was never a pot smoker and thus never tracked the market rate. Is suspect it's not a lot cheaper, mainly because the market is regulated for labeling, packaging, content, strength etc.
There's this.
"...Are there any states where buying legal weed is as easy as buying cigarettes or beer?"
Yep .Oregon. I live in a small coastal town, and there are three dispensaries within fifteen minutes of my house. And yeah, it's pretty cheap. Not quite as easy as buying beer, but not by much.
State-by-State prices for pot:
https://oxfordtreatment.com/substance-abuse/marijuana/average-cost-of-marijuana/
In Illinois the recreational prices are probably not competitive. But pretty much anybody can get a medical card and grow their own. You can buy seeds at the dispensary or online. Gotta pay with bitcoin if you go the online route but you have a much better selection. A seed runs about 10 bucks. My wife has been doing this since they legalized. She just harvested two autoflower plants that she grew on a coffee table in our sunroom. Together they produced 2 and a half ounces of bud worth over a grand at dispensary prices. Our son is a chemist and tests the product for THC etc. Tests out as good or better than the packaged stuff. Even without the card, growing for personal use is a misdemeanor and I doubt LEOs want to spend much time on it. The marijuana situation is still evolving here I think as people begin to understand their options and government begins to face the consequences of regulation but overall I think Illinois did a pretty good job on legalization.
Even without the card, growing for personal use is a misdemeanor and I doubt LEOs want to spend much time on it.
LEOs can use civil forfeiture to seize property. The justification is the pot. Might want to watch out. Doesn't matter if its legal in IL, cops use the FBI authority to seize and get a cut of the proceeds.
https://reason.com/search/civil%20forfeiture%20marijuana/
I don't love paying exorbitant taxes, but I'd rather pay more on the legal market than pursue the black market at a discount for many reasons. Having to be associated with some sketchy drug dealer, being concerned with quality and quantity, having literally zero choice and just getting what you get. Or walking in, having a knowledgeable associate go over hundreds of options, knowing the quality and quantity of what you are getting, etc, and paying a tax. I've done both. The latter is far, far preferable to me.
Of course, the democrats are actually interested in taxing weed, not
legalizing it.
Ukrainian troops in Azovstal steelworks surrender to Russian forces.
This was initially covered by Western Media as an "evacuation" but has now begun to shift to 'surrender'.
No.
174 days.
Why? When Blue Anon theories like white supremacy white replacement talking points exist?
The Associated Press
@AP
BREAKING: The FBI has opened a federal hate crime investigation into last week’s shooting at a hair salon in Dallas’ Koreatown area that injured three people. Dallas police said earlier Tuesday that they had arrested a suspect in the case.
Outrage everyone!!!
Jeremy Smith is accused of entering the Hair World Salon and opening fire with a .22-caliber rifle, Police Chief Edgardo Garcia said Tuesday. Smith, who is Black, is jailed and no bond has been set. Jail records do not list an attorney for him.
Nm. Pot it is.
Why is it that when Republicans pivot toward school choice, Reason asks "Will they screw it up?" but when Democrats pivot toward pot, they ask "Will it work?"
Dems are tolerating pot, for now, to get more GenZ votes, but as with everything else, they will turn around and fuck over those who they are supposedly trying to help. There already are rumblings about teen pot addiction by the “experts”, so in a few years, the dems will be calling to lock the stoners up again.!
A bot that's more coherent than the squirrel
Isn't it though.
Need more corprophilia.