Biden Brags About Falling Deficits, but the Federal Fiscal Situation Is Still 'Unsustainable'
Under current policies, Social Security and Medicare will consume 85 percent of all federal tax revenue by 2050.

America faces an "unsustainable" fiscal situation as the national debt grows steadily larger, entitlement programs find themselves on increasingly shaky footing, and rising interest rates compound the costs of decades of overspending.
That's the ugly three-part warning issued this week by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in an annual report on the nation's fiscal health—or, in this case, the lack thereof. "The federal government faces an unsustainable fiscal future," the GAO concludes, with the national debt already nearing historical highs and forecast to grow at an accelerating pace unless major changes to current policy are made.
New borrowing made on an emergency basis during the COVID-19 pandemic added about $5.5 trillion to an already bleak fiscal picture, but the GAO report makes clear that the real drivers of America's debt problem have little to do with the crisis of the past two years. Instead, it's entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare that are the real—and growing—burden.
"The underlying conditions driving this unsustainable fiscal outlook existed well before the COVID-19 pandemic and continue to pose serious challenges if not addressed," the GAO warns.
As part of its assessment of the federal government's fiscal health, the GAO ran a 30-year simulation based on current policies. It found that the national debt will grow twice as fast as the economy in most years and that Social Security and Medicare will consume 85 percent of all projected tax revenue by 2050, up from 63 percent in 2019. That leaves precious little revenue for literally everything else the government spends money to accomplish—from national defense to infrastructure projects to research on nicotine-addicted fish.
Whatever your priority might be, it's going to be squeezed out by the entitlement state.
Those 30-year projections showing growing deficits and unsustainable levels of debt stand in stark contrast to the Biden administration's latest—and incredibly short-sighted—approach to budgeting. The budget deficit, Biden claimed this week, has "gone down both years since I've been here. Period. They're the facts."
The new GAO report includes a chart that helpfully illustrates Biden's myopia. The president is looking at only three years of deficits—the years I've highlighted in the chart below—while ignoring the rest of the picture.

Despite how it might appear to someone refusing to look outside of that red box, it's obvious that deficits are not falling and are on course to continue growing for the foreseeable future.
In fact, this is likely an overly rosy assessment of how the future will play out. As the GAO notes, its "simulations assume that interest rates will increase over the next 30 years to 4.6 percent in 2051, from the historically low levels over the last 20 years."
But what if interest rates jump higher than projected? That's a distinct possibility now that inflation has taken off. The GAO only says that higher interest rates would translate into "higher than projected would further increase interest costs and debt." However, according to calculations by Brian Riedl, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a former Senate budget staffer, if interest rates average two percentage points above the Congressional Budget Office baseline, interest costs on the debt will be equal to 100 percent of tax revenue by 2051.
In other words, even just a slightly higher than expected average interest rate over the next three decades would create a situation where every single dollar of tax revenue would be directed to paying for money already borrowed and spent. That means nothing left over for the military, social programs, entitlements, or anything else.
Wait—you might be thinking—if the federal government has to spend 100 percent of tax revenue on interest payments by 2050, then how can it also spend 85 percent of all tax dollars on Social Security and Medicare by 2050?
Exactly. That's why this situation is not sustainable.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Nothing on the department of Environmental Justice yet?
Not 4pm yet.
Is that when Bailey wakes up?
Is this a new thing? Wouldn't surprise me.
Yep one more government attempt to divide us.
Liberals still fiscally incompetent: more at 11
I am sure the Ministry of Truth will have these lies and fabrications corrected by tonight.
The Biden administration has brought the best economy ever.
(I am Nina Jankowicz, and I approve this message)
Sounds Janky.
As long as the social security payments I pre-paid with a quarter of a million dollars of payroll taxes get paid back as agreed, I don't care.
Now the rest of you take two jobs and get to work!
I admit, I saw that chart and the Covid-19 years highlighted and immediately though to myself "Never Forget".
I'm a piece of shit.
Elon Musk can by Congress and fix it.
It was already sold - - - - - - - - - - - -
You stumpped for the guy you facist trash
Reason and boehm did everything thing they could to make sure Trump lost. Now they act as if it never happened.
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
Let’s just print money, then take it back
https://mobile.twitter.com/followtheh/status/1521481242901942275
Always amazing watching liberals adding one time spending to the baseline budget to claim they decreased spending.
It's like watching a man leaving a casino with empty pockets bragging how he hasn't spent any money between the door and his car.
SleepyJoe lied? No way. He’s never done that before.
Oh, wait.
One has to laugh at such retardedness...
Democrats brag about being financially responsible.
"But hey! Here's another TRILLION dollar stimulus bill :)....."
but don't worry; it's not 'real' money --- It's monopoly money!
Or hey; "Lets just Gang up with Gov-Guns and go STEAL it from citizens."
How dumb do they think people are??
Let's not forget Romney, the Democrat who claims to be a Republican who is pushing for $1250/month payments to families as part of the budget.
In their defense, people are pretty fucking dumb.
If Social Security isn't taking in enough, along with all that has been collected throughout its lifetime, to make current payouts, it would be considered bankrupt.
We are told it isn't bankrupt, so it isn't putting out more than it has collected.
What is called "spending on Social Security" is paying back money, borrowed from the system, that is done outside the yearly budgets.
Sure, we're spending on Medicare, because it is very expensive and the 1% payroll tax and the premiums Medicare recipients pay can't keep up, but "spending on Social Security" is the kind of thing a real business would consider embezzlement.
More like fraud than embezzlement, I think.
But yeah, it was a scam from day one.
But we have to remember, it was done by democrats "for our own good".
(actually, it was done to get old folks to actually retire so the young men could take the jobs. As I once read, "large numbers of unemployed young men have scared politicians since the French Revolution".)
"...But yeah, it was a scam from day one..."
Some of the more recent books dealing with FDR in some manner or other are finally beginning to admit that the man was a pathological liar.
Some are also admitting the man was incompetent regarding grooming Truman for office while knowing his own death was imminent, regardless of the blatant lying by his doctor (who should have lost his license as a result).
Miscamble ("From Roosevelt to Truman: Potsdam, Hiroshima, and the Cold War", 2006) was, AFAIK, the first to risk being pilloried for honesty regarding that wanna-be emperor, and since he didn't get hung in effigy, others have decided that a bit of honesty is indicated.
Good: Maybe the scumbag will finally get his proper place in history.
It seems he deserves props for exactly one bit of policy: He placed control of WWII in the hands of some pretty competent people and thereafter had enough sense to let them do their jobs.
The bad news is that when thousands of migrant of mothers in their middle ages are 20 years away from collecting medicare benefits. So we're really hoping that someone fixes medicare or that all incoming people and their adult offspring work full time immediately. Even then, they'll likely take in 3 times what they paid into the system.
Immigration is good for the economy, but they'll almost certainly lead to more, not less, spending - at least if we continue to spend in the manner that we are now. And at a rate America is admitting foreign nationals, the downside of incoming human wave will be slowly negate the benefits. Just look at CA.