Regulation

FDA Case for Menthol Ban Undermined by New Study

Menthols aren’t harder to quit than other cigarettes.

|

Just in time for the Food and Drug Administration's expected announcement of a formal rule to ban menthol cigarettes, a new study undermines one of the agency's central arguments for prohibition.

The FDA claims that menthol cigarette brands (which contain high amounts of mint flavoring unlike typical cigarettes) are easier to start smoking, more appealing to youth, and more addictive than their non-menthol counterparts. But that's hard to square with the existing data. According to the 2021 National Youth Tobacco Survey, more than 60 percent of middle and high school students who smoke use non-menthol cigarettes. It's widely known in the public health community that menthol smokers typically start later in life and smoke fewer cigarettes per day. A Reason Foundation study found that states with the highest menthol consumption also had the lowest youth smoking rates.

But there is another argument in the FDA's dwindling arsenal. FDA and its allies claim menthol cigarettes are harder to quit, particularly for African Americans. Because around 85 percent of African American smokers use menthols compared to around 30 percent of white smokers, the Biden administration believes prohibition would "promote health equity" and reduce health disparities. It should be noted that according to the American Cancer Society, disparities are already narrowing because African American youth are less likely to start smoking than their peers of other races. Furthermore, African American adults do not smoke at significantly higher rates than whites.    

A new study conducted by researchers from Vanderbilt University Medical Center, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, finds no statistically significant difference in quit rates between menthol and non-menthol smokers. Using data from participants in the Southern Community Cohort Study, the average annual quit rate was 4.3 percent for menthol smokers and 4.5 percent for non-menthol smokers. There was also no difference in quit rates between African American and white smokers.

"In this large-scale follow-up study, we could not confirm the FDA's report that menthols are harder to quit, at least in the population we followed," said the study's corresponding author, William Blot.

Blot also highlighted a potential unintended consequence of menthol prohibition: "If the existing epidemiologic data showing lower risk of lung cancer among menthol than non-menthol smokers hold generally, then in the long-term if high percentages of menthol smokers switch to non-menthols, the ban could have the unintended consequence of a net increase rather than decrease in risk, at least for lung cancer." Blot is referring to scientific literature, including research he has authored, showing menthol smokers typically contract lung cancer at lower rates than non-menthol users. While the mechanisms for these findings are not well understood, as menthols are just as deadly as non-menthol cigarettes, it could result from menthol smokers starting later in life and smoking less.

Where they've been implemented, like in the European Union and Canada, menthol cigarette bans have been a disappointment to their supporters. Most menthol smokers switch to regular cigarettes, buy illicit menthol, or use devices to adulterate legal cigarettes to give them a minty taste. But the U.S. is uniquely vulnerable to the dangers of prohibition. Its menthol market is larger by comparison, at around a third of cigarette sales, and there are significant racial disparities in use patterns.

Law enforcement groups, civil rights organizations, and think tanks are pleading with the Biden administration to embrace a strategy of harm reduction instead of criminalization to reduce smoking rates. But in the name of equity, Biden's FDA appears committed to banning a product disproportionately used by African Americans while leaving the favored cigarette of white smokers free and clear. If prohibition is a necessary and proper solution to menthol smoking, which is unpopular among a majority of youth and adult smokers, why wouldn't the same logic apply to non-menthol cigarettes, which are responsible for the majority of smoking-related diseases?

It's hard to answer this question without coming to the conclusion that the administration believes singling out a minority of a minority is an easier prospect than trying to ban all cigarettes at once. And if one can do so under the guise of promoting racial equity, so much the better.

NEXT: MSNBC's Joy Reid Claims Elon Musk 'Misses' Apartheid-Era South Africa

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Black folk are able to appreciate that smooth taste in a way that white folk don't. White folk move to ban it for smooth equity among the races.
    It's a bad look.

    1. Conclusions Although menthol smokers were most likely to switch to non-menthol cigarettes, the menthol ban was also significantly associated with higher rates of quit attempts and quit success among menthol smokers compared with non-menthol smokers, and may have helped to prevent relapse among menthol smokers who had quit smoking before the ban.

  2. The white man knows what’s best for the black man.

    1. The FDA is racist.

  3. If prohibition is a necessary and proper solution to menthol smoking, drinking beer, which is unpopular among a majority of youth and adult smokers, why wouldn't the same logic apply to non-menthol cigarettes, hard liquors, which are responsible for the majority of smoking-related diseases sarc’s problems?

  4. Blot is referring to scientific literature, including research he has authored, showing menthol smokers typically contract lung cancer at lower rates than non-menthol users. While the mechanisms for these findings are not well understood, as menthols are just as deadly as non-menthol cigarettes,

    Wait...how do you know that?

    1. I mean, seriously, how do we know menthol doesn't exert a protective effect? Is anyone checking that out? Might it work against other cancers too?

      1. Anytime you mention cigarettes, you have to say they are dangerous. It is known.

        1. It’s been known for some time that menthol has anti-inflammatory properties. Chronic lung inflammation in a one of the drivers of lung cancer, which could explain why those who smoke menthols are less likely to get it. As to why the FDA wants now to ban it-since when has the FDA, or most government agencies, ever made a logical decision, especially in the past two years?

      2. A protective effect is possible, but smoking less accounts for the difference in cancer rates. I suspect that menthol cigarettes are preferred by people that smoke for social reasons but really don't like cigarettes.

  5. F'en Nazi's....

  6. Based on the FDA thinking on vaping, menthol, vaccine and therapeutics approval, etc. does anyone really believe they are worried about the health of Americans? Playing tin gods to the masses is such a rush for these bureaucrats.

    1. Conclusions Although menthol smokers were most likely to switch to non-menthol cigarettes, the menthol ban was also significantly associated with higher rates of quit attempts and quit success among menthol smokers compared with non-menthol smokers, and may have helped to prevent relapse among menthol smokers who had quit smoking before the ban.

  7. The federal government doesn't care about science. It only cares about Science™.

    1. It’s pretty easy to make your own menthols, or any flavor you want of vape juice.

  8. Banning menthol would encourage smokers to move to vaping products.

    1. They are banning flavored vapes too, along with flavored smokeless tobacco and even flavored nicotine pouches (not sure about FDA, but DC, Massachusetts, and many localities already have). The hope is it will not attract kiddos to nicotine, but when it doesn’t work, they will probably mandate that all tobacco products taste like dog shit, and when that doesn’t work, you will see a complete ban

  9. The result of the Left's paternalistic attitude towards black people and the start of a new round of "systemic racism" accusations when the policy goes pear shaped.

  10. Will be interesting to see how this shakes out for the Donkey Party in the mid terms after they have pissed off a big chunk of their constituents who can’t get their Kools or Newpies.

  11. I'm a Democrat. I care about racism and and health and stuff. And no, you can't smoke that. Instead, consider wearing this mask, like all of us do. Yes, this is about health. Also, here's something else to smoke for you instead. Your brain's still developing? That's great, take another hit. You gonna vote for me now? 🙂

  12. Conclusions Although menthol smokers were most likely to switch to non-menthol cigarettes, the menthol ban was also significantly associated with higher rates of quit attempts and quit success among menthol smokers compared with non-menthol smokers, and may have helped to prevent relapse among menthol smokers who had quit smoking before the ban.

  13. It's not even real mentholiptous btw.

    If you medicate the pain from taking a caustic substance.... thats pretty stupid on its face.

    I think its catholic mafia sht, but i can totaly see banning menthol cigs.

    Mint cigs are much nicer anyway. But fk all that, gimmy american spirit blacks. Nothing beats em. Except cubans.

    What do you want? What does any kind of addict want. Fagy flavorings, or deep rich dark dosage. Get real.

    However, i think this is all a coverup for jHoe's dopers pushing all his afghan/south-american-catholic pederast-heroin-cartel vitamins.

    Kings of substance abuse and smuggling attacking every competition thats legal.

    THIS IS WHY YOU DONT LET CATHOLICS IN CHARGE IF YOU WERE DUMB ENOUGH TO LET THEM IN YOUR HOUSE.

    only what the entire fking constatution was meant to prevent ffs.

    Punk is dead.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.