Biden Begins Using Clemency To Ameliorate the Damage Done by the Draconian Drug Policies He Long Supported
The 75 commutations announced today, while impressive compared to the pitiful records of previous presidents, pale beside a huge backlog of petitions.

President Joe Biden used his clemency powers for the first time today, granting three pardons and 75 commutations. All but one of the beneficiaries were convicted of drug offenses, and many were serving egregiously long prison terms of the sort that Biden enthusiastically supported during his 36 years in the Senate.
The commutations announced today, Biden noted, involve "people who are serving long sentences for non-violent drug offenses, many of whom have been serving on home confinement during the COVID pandemic—and many of whom would have received a lower sentence if they were charged with the same offense today, thanks to the bipartisan First Step Act." The New York Times reports that "almost a third of those who benefited from the clemency would have received a lower sentence if they were charged today."
As a presidential candidate, Biden presented himself as criminal justice reformer who had seen the error of his draconian ways. He called for abolishing the mandatory minimum sentences he was largely responsible for creating and promised to "broadly use his clemency power for certain non-violent and drug crimes." While Biden still faces a huge backlog of clemency petitions and has a long way to go in ameliorating the damage he did as a gung-ho drug warrior, this first installment of commutations seems promising because of its timing.
Although Biden waited more than 15 months before issuing any pardons or commutations, that delay compares favorably to those of many previous presidents. Even Barack Obama, who ultimately granted a record 1,715 commutations, did not approve any until the last year of his first term, and then just one. Obama did not get serious until the third year of his second term, and the vast majority of his commutations came during his last year in office.
That sort of timing is typical. Presidents tend to treat clemency as an afterthought rather than an ongoing process of correcting injustices, partly because they figure any political backlash against their decisions will be limited if they make them on their way out the door. Biden evidently anticipates that the net political impact of freeing nonviolent drug offenders will be positive, which is a good sign.
The Times suggests that Biden was motivated by "growing consternation among progressive groups, which say the president has not focused enough on issues resonating in communities of color, such as voting rights or legislation to overhaul policing." In light of falling approval ratings and "a domestic agenda stalled amid a bare majority in Congress," it says, "the president has fielded calls from his allies to pivot away from day-to-day negotiations with lawmakers and instead wield his executive power." Since the Constitution gives the president plenary power to grant pardons and commutations, it is one indisputably legal way he can act unilaterally to placate his progressive critics.
Biden's clemency actions no doubt will provide ammunition to mindlessly punitive politicians like Sen. Tom Cotton (R–Ark.). But the president's commutations should count in his favor among people who recognize that there can be such a thing as an excessively harsh penalty for violating the government's arbitrary restrictions on psychoactive substances.
The successful petitioners include Jose Luis Colunga, a Nebraska man who was convicted of conspiring to distribute 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana—the sort of conduct that is now treated as a legitimate business in most states. Colunga received a 20-year sentence in 2010; he is now scheduled to be released in October 2023 after serving 13 years.
Biden also granted a commutation to Byron James Miller, a Missouri man who received two consecutive sentences, totaling nearly 42 years, for crack cocaine offenses in 1997 and 1999. Miller will now go free next April, having served 26 years.* Sharon Louise Boatright, a Texas woman who received a sentence of nearly 16 years in 2013 for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, is now also scheduled to be released next April after almost a decade behind bars.
Even with the commutations, these sentences are unconscionably long, especially for crimes that entailed nothing more than consensual transactions among adults. But Biden is at least using his clemency power to address some of the harm caused by the brutal drug policies he pushed before he saw the light.
Erik Altieri, executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, notes that nine of Biden's clemency actions—one pardon and eight commutations—involved people convicted of marijuana offenses. "Branding thousands of our citizens as lifelong criminals because of a marijuana-related offense serves no legitimate societal purpose," he says. "While granting clemency to nine individuals for federal marijuana offenses is the right thing to do, it is woefully inadequate when there remain over 10,000 individuals who still suffer under the weight of a federal charge on their criminal record. It is well past the time for President Biden to make good on his campaign promise to expunge the records of all federal marijuana offenders and prove that justice isn't just a buzzword he uses to gain votes during election season."
The Times notes that "Biden has issued more grants [of] clemency than any of his immediate five predecessors at the same point in their presidencies." But today's commutations, while impressive by the pitiful standards of most recent presidents, are barely noticeable next to the appalling backlog of some 19,000 petitions that Biden still faces.
"While today's announcement marks important progress," Biden says, "my Administration will continue to review clemency petitions and deliver reforms that advance equity and justice, provide second chances, and enhance the wellbeing and safety of all Americans." The bipartisan coalition that recognizes the cruelty frequently inflicted by our criminal justice system should hold him to that promise.
*CORRECTION: This post has been revised to correct the information about Miller's sentences.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I was for Draconian prison sentences before I was against them.
I was for grammatically correct sentences before I against them were.
He just transferred his ire to people putting feet on Pelosis desk.
Has he pardoned Hunter yet?
He's first. Didn't you hear the speech on 'Some of us like to post naked pictures of ourselves in a drug addled state'? haha
The 75 commutations announced today, while impressive compared to the pitiful records of previous presidents, pale beside a huge backlog of petitions.
It's very strange to believe people wanting clemency proves they deserve it.
It's very strange to believe someone's incarceration proves they deserve it.
His handlers do something right for a change.
Dude needs to lose the aviators. They haven't been cool since the 80s.
But his fans love the aviators.
All 10 of them.
Did you ever consider they may be the only sunglasses available from the hospice care staff?
Trump’s first step act.
They just couldn’t say it.
Still no cure for TDS.
They sure as hell can hear voters say Naral! Jackson! Repeal! Losers!
Seems like you would support the first step act.
Unless all your barely coherent ramblings are just a show, and you don’t really believe what you say.
I don't have strong feelings on this one. It's fine that he granted clemency, but it's not really a meaningful path forward to reform. Good for those specific people, but this is closer to theater than governance.
We should not want a system where a single person at the top is picking and choosing clemency. We want a system in place to do so. Process matters and is justice in its own right.
Well, look on the bright side! You can improve your chances for pardons by buying some Hunter Biden art!
https://www.vox.com/2021/8/3/22601671/hunter-biden-art-sales-walter-shaub “Why Obama’s former ethics czar is highly critical of Hunter Biden’s lucrative art sales … There have been many bad-faith “scandals” linked to the president’s son. Walter Shaub thinks this one should be taken seriously.
I wonder if the Trumpaloos will now show up to say that Vox is liberally biased, and can't be trusted? This here “Vox” article MUST mean that Hunter Biden is a GREAT artist, and there are NO opportunities for corruption, here!
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/vox-news-media-bias
“VOX” rated as far-left as is allowed… The needle is pegged!
PROOF, then, that Hunter Biden art is of NO concern to stalwart conservatives and Trumpaloos! (Since Vox always lies, of course).
You know what other young political aspirant sold paintings... now worth more than Picassos in Germany?
Yeah, I know of the Dude... He was closely related to Trump! (Politically, at least).
https://www.salon.com/2021/04/11/trumps-big-lie-and-hitlers-is-this-how-americas-slide-into-totalitarianism-begins/
Trump’s Big Lie and Hitler’s: Is this how America’s slide into totalitarianism begins?
The above is mostly strictly factual, with very little editorializing. When I post it, the FACTS never get refuted… I only get called names. But what do you expect from morally, ethically, spiritually, and intellectually bankrupt Trumpturds?
Totalitarians want to turn GOP into GOD (Grand Old Dicktatorshit).
When you start with a false premise there is nothing to dispute. End of story. It's also filled with all of the insinuation that makes the real Big Lie, The Insurrection!!!!, tangentially tangented to a tangent which may or may not have been tangentially related to something Trump said which really, I mean really, really, got his followers fired up to STORM!!!! the capitol.
Facts always get in the way of your narrative. So it is ignored and you get called names because the idea is still dumb, even all these months later.
Der TrumpfenFuhrer ***IS*** responsible for agitating for democracy to be replaced by mobocracy!
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/24/politics/trump-election-warnings-leaving-office/index.html
A list of the times Trump has said he won’t accept the election results or leave office if he loses.
Essential heart and core of the LIE by Trump: “ANY election results not confirming MEEE as Your Emperor, MUST be fraudulent!”
September 13 rally: “The Democrats are trying to rig this election because that’s the only way they’re going to win,” he said.
Trump’s constant re-telling and supporting the Big Lie (any election not electing Trump is “stolen”) set up the environment for this (insurrection riot) to happen. He shares the blame. Boys will be boys? Insurrectionists will be insurrectionists, trumpanzees gone apeshit will be trumpanzees gone apeshit, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Trump was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?
It really should immediately make us think of Krystallnacht. Hitler and the NAZIs set up for this by constantly blaming Jews for all things bad. Jew-haters will be Jew-haters, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Hitler was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?
A list of the times Trump has said he won’t accept the election results or leave office if he loses
Lots of inference; short on fact, SQRLSY.
Correlation is not causation.
Protest for grievance is not insurrection, no matter how you color it.
Someone set a campfire in the middle of the dry forest, in a drought. Flying embers from the fire may or may not have set the fire that burned down 50,000 acres... No one was there to see it for sure! It might have been a cigarette carelessly dropped by Sasquatch!
"Correlation is not causation." No one knows the root cause for SURE, precisely!
It is STILL a good idea to NOT set a sloppily supervised campfire in the middle of the drought! It would STILL be a good idea to NOT vote for egotistical, selfish, self-centered, narcissistic assholes like Trump!
It would STILL be a good idea to NOT vote for egotistical, selfish, self-centered, narcissistic assholes like Trump!
Your campfire analogy has about as much credence as the meter of your poetry. It is okay to not want Trump. You are certainly not alone. It amazes me how much you haters of Trump cling to every little morsel of bad narrative so you can throw it out there at any instance for attack. Sad really.
You didn't vote for him and guess what, he's not the president now either. Your rudeo clown is at the helm with his cacklin' sidekick, Mala Kamala.
Enjoy the show SQRLSY. The nuts are plentiful now.
"The nuts are plentiful now." ... Good one! I like it!
But it seems to me that this is ALWAYS true!
"It's good to be a gangsta. It's good to be king. And it's good to be SQRLSY!" (To be honest, the 1st 2 are usually one and the same.)
Your campfire analogy does work well for the 2020 Election. There sure were some sparks in the air, but no one could seem to recognize where they originated. It's a shame there were all those cameras everywhere catching a number of very suspicious activities through the night.
But nothing to see here. Most secure ever. Well, no widespread security issues really.
It is STILL a good idea to NOT set a sloppily supervised campfire in the middle of the drought!
It is STILL NOT good idea to have a sloppily supervised Election in the middle of the night!
Good one @ the conclusion there!
(In my home state they have made improvements; paper tracking on top of the electronics gizmos.)
this is an article.
Jesus h. Christ, Journolists...
That's OK, Seattle Times, you assholes claimed surgical masks were "55% effective". On the scale of truthiness, Musk is 158,947% more correct than you are.
If we define cases the way we have forever, kids ARE essentially immune because covid doesn't make them sick enough to seek medical care.
or those looking to find a Twitter alternative to escape Musk’s vision, there are limited options. [...]
There are foundering conservative sites such as Gettr, Gab, Parler and Donald Trump’s Truth Social, but these already tout free speech as a core principle and are filled with far-right ideology.
They're CONSERVATIVE SITES! Conservative! Conserrrrvativvvee....
Truly that is, an article.
Oh man. The best line in that article is this one:
One other possible side effect of a Musk-led Twitter could be a rise in misinformation, experts say.
The experts are uncited, of course. Just a vague assertion of dread.
I really want us to reach a point where everything doesn't need to be so damn hysterical in tone. I mean, fuck.
>>so damn hysterical in tone
only way the left wins.
Children are dying!
Misinformation is a side effect of politicians + freespeech, but that's just one of the prices to be paid for it. Please don't tell me you fell for all the Trump shitposting? lmfao
LOL
Leftists are pathetic clumps of cells
"Experts say" will go down in history as this era's "Arbeit Macht Frei."
Yes, just like unlucky people just get pregnant for no reason or fault of their own, other unlucky people just find themselves with bags of drugs for no reason or fault of their own! People just don't have agency! Everything that happens to you is the fault of "society" or "fate" or "racism" or "your parents"!
Seriously, we can debate whether drug laws should be abolished. But as long as they exist, people are obligated to obey them or do the time when they are caught. These "non-violent drug offenders" knew they were breaking the law and they knew the consequences.
"These "non-violent drug offenders" knew they were breaking the law and they knew the consequences."
Just like witches breaking anti-witches laws during the witch-burning era!!! Jews in the NAZI era, etc. ... DON'T BE A WITCH OR A JEW, DAMMIT!!!!
Sane people understand that accusations of witchcraft were necessarily false. Libertarians understand that being Jewish is an ethnicity and religion, not a deliberate choice to break the law.
Such elementary facts are, of course, lost on mentally ill fascists like you, SQRLSY One.
If the law says not to belong to the Jewish religion, then you are being punished for your deliberate choice of belonging to the Jewish religion! What is so hard to understand THAT?
PS, being a "witch" (Wiccan, Pagan) is also a religious choice!
PPS, "mentally ill", my ass! Whoever disagrees with Noy-Boy-Toy is "mentally ill"! That makes YOU just like the communist totalitarian assholes of the USSR who used psychiatry to punish political dissidents, asshole!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union#:~:text=During%20the%20leadership%20of%20General,that%20contradicted%20the%20official%20dogma.
Ah, I see, you are historically illiterate. Hitler didn't persecute people for "belonging to the Jewish religion", he persecuted people for being of Jewish ancestry. That's because Hitler's ideology was rooted in eugenics.
It is. However, the women persecuted in the witch hunts were not, in fact witches.
So, I'm afraid your analogy doesn't work.
No, just you. You're not mentally ill because of your beliefs, you are mentally ill because of the way you behave.
Communist totalitarianism uses the state to forcibly institutionalize political dissidents under the pretext that they are mentally ill.
Nowhere have I advocated that the government should forcibly institutionalize you. You have likely freely chosen to live as a crazy drug addict in a tent somewhere and I fully support your ability to make that choice.
"The Google" may know all, but I can find nothing about non-ethnic-Jews becoming converts to Judaism in NAZI Germany (yes, I know, the ultra-orthodox usually won't allow that anyway... But more liberal Jews WILL!) ... Do you REALLY think that the NAZIs would have approved of their citizens doing this?!?!? What planet are you from?
All that to the side, you are STILL a fascist! Outlaw grapefruits, blue ribbons in your hair, or picking your nose on Sunday... Outlaw ANYTHING, and there will ALWAYS be fascists like YOU, lusting after PUNISHMENT for LAWBREAKING SCUM who KNEW that they were violating the Sacred Laws!!! Authoritarian power-lusters, all of ye! No matter HOW far-reaching and stupid the laws may actually be!
I'm a law abiding citizen of a fairly liberal and free nation that provides equality under the law. I expect my fellow citizens to obey laws just like I do and get punished just like I do and use the political process to change laws if they don't like them.
If you think that makes me a "fascist" you don't understand what fascism is.
They knew what they were getting into. I say Let em crash
You seriously don't understand the difference between choosing to get on an aircraft and choosing to deal in illegal drugs? Really?
In both cases, one is taking a known risk! QED!
(So that justifies my deliberately shooting down, or sabotaging, your aircraft! You KNEW you were taking a risk!)
Fascist asshole!
By "both" we mean counting only the votes demanding increased initiation of force and struggling to evade those others?
Yeah man! Any votes not for MEEEEE as your Force-User-and-Pussy-Grabber In Chief, have GOT to be fraudulent!
Your signature is apt: you are a fascist asshole.
As for your and JFree's analogies, I'll leave it to you to figure out the differences between airline travel and drug use. Give it some thought, you'll no doubt get there eventually if you try.
In both cases, there are people who don't approve (of recreational drug use and of air travel). Amish and Old Order Mennonites, some of them, would ban you and shun you (as a now-FORMER member of their church, for having done modern, sinful things). At least they don't support fascist politicians who will JAIL you for doing things that they disapprove of (like you apparently do).
Good for them! It's a free country.
I don't support fascist politicians, or politicians who write draconian drug laws, or politicians who want to tax people excessively. However, until the laws are changed, I expect other people to abide by them, just like I do.
"people are obligated to obey them or do the time when they are caught."
Do you feel this way about the J6 protesters' sentences?
Yes: January 6 protesters who destroyed property, made a deliberate choice to commit trespass, or committed violent acts should be punished according to the law.
The problem with the January 6 protesters is that many of them have been denied a speedy trial and are not afforded equal protection under the law for political reasons. That is wrong.
Don’t fear the revolt!
(insurrection)!
All our times have come
Here, but now they’re gone
Seasons don’t fear the revolt
Nor do the wind, the sun, or the rain
(We can be like they are)
Come on, baby
(Don’t fear the revolt)
Baby, take my hand
(Don’t fear the revolt)
We’ll be able to fly
Baby, I’m your man
La, la la, la la
La, la la, la la
Valentine is done
Here but now they’re gone
Horst Wessel and Ashli Babbs
Are together in eternity
(Horst Wessel and Ashli Babbitt)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horst_Wessel
Got it. So any punishment for any behavior is justifiable along as all the arbitrary laws are followed. Well, I'm sure the government will find those trials were speedy and offered equal protection within some arbitrary rules (even if theycontradict other rules.)
We live in a nation of laws. I obey them and I expect others to do the same. If you break those laws, you will pay the price. Don't blame me for it.
Which part of this did you not understand? The problem with the January 6 protesters is that many of them have been denied a speedy trial and are not afforded equal protection under the law for political reasons. That is wrong.
I think I understand all parts, I just disagree with
1 the part where you assume that the drug offenders got a fair trial, but the J6 offenders didn't and
2 where any punishment for any behavior is justifiable as long as it was codified beforehand and prosecuted within the rules of the system.
It's all good, though. You addressed my question and I understand your opinions on this issue and I appreciate you coming back to the thread to answer me. Thanks!
The way things are shaping up for the Dems every vote will count.
Well, every Dem vote will count, at least.
Some will be counted many times.
Democrat funded activists with printers at the ready. Able to generate bulk ballots as needed.
https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-afraid-even-the-dead-may-vote-republican-this-november
I full expect him to pull the $10k off student loans at some point this summer. You heard it here second, folks.
Yep. Legal contracts become meaningless when a democrat is in charge.
That has never been true of votes wasted on entrenched sclerotic parties. The votes that count with a vote-changing multiplier leverage are votes invested in a growing small party that seeks to repeal coercion rather than add to it. All major changes bear this out. When looters whine that "every vote counts" they are struggling to conceal their fear of Libertarian spoiler votes.
Now if only the other septuagenarians & octogenarians in Congress would get with the program we might have weed by this summer. I know it's just a dream...
Libertarian votes are what these things happen.
Well said.
This guy said it almost as well.
preethi
April.27.2022 at 3:37 am
Mute User
Good decision biden will great
This is why we had to elect him. To give him a chance to deliver justice for previous wrongs. Imagine how much justice could be done if we elected Trump a second time.
Someone is acting like a president in his last term of office.
Biden's funeral should draw a huge crowd of terrified christianofascist prohibitionists. The elevation of Kamala Harris to chief enforcer of laws will drive home the realization that voters get the coercion they demanded and deserve.
Good decision biden will great
generator for rent in Hyderabad
It’s both conservative and libertarian to commute or pardon. “Correctional” facilities are a drag on the economy, lowers tax revenue, increases taxpayer expenses and most don’t “correct” at all. Most coming out of prison aren’t reformed but made worse.
Good job President Biden! Biden should name it the “Scooter Libby Act” - since he was both commuted and pardoned for his actions depicted in the movie “Fair Game”. Libby was privileged and attended the best law schools, unlike most poor people with no legal knowledge.
75. Out of tens or hundreds of thousands his policies and the laws he help draft put there. Not even a drop in the bucket. You get no points for cleaning up a tiny fraction of the mess you made.
Afterthought? Some 95% of voters demand the initiation of deadly force and incarceration for the most harmless vices. Dems needed the LP to NOT get 4 million votes, so LNC saddles our ticket with a running mate straight out of Salvador Dali's painting titled Hitler Masturbating . Then to bleed off republican votes, what better technique (sans public stoning of women) than to recycle a bloodthirsty "Just Say No" Czarist? The Dems got serious about kneecapping the opposition and attracted shrieking looters.
Humorously if the judicial branch would do their damn job of upholding the U.S. Constitution over politicians there wouldn't even be such a thing a drug violations at the federal level.
I take that back; unless those charges were drug smuggling from outside countries.
Yeah! I hope Biden is rightfully ashamed of those decades of declining violent crime rates. It's a first step in his rehabilitation that he is supporting those forces who have been working diligently to reverse that decline!
So, Dictator Biden is going to ensure that more violent criminals will go free while cracking down 5x as hard on any free speech that opposes his illegitimate regime.
Radley Balko must be ecstatic.