The U.S. Only Resettled 12 Ukrainian Refugees Last Month
The U.S. has taken in more Ukrainians through other migration pathways, but the low refugee tally shows how ill-prepared the U.S. refugee resettlement program was to help Ukrainians.

On March 24, President Joe Biden announced that the United States would accept up to 100,000 displaced Ukrainians. The move came one month after Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a large-scale invasion of Ukraine, which has forced roughly 4.5 million people to flee the country to date.
Though the Biden administration's plan may seem like an appropriate response to the mounting migration crisis in Europe, there's no indication that the U.S. will be capable of processing that many fleeing Ukrainians. In March, just 12 Ukrainians came to the U.S. through the American refugee program.
That abysmal number highlights several key issues that stand in the way of the U.S. helping Ukrainians. First, the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is ill-prepared to efficiently process any great number of Ukrainian refugees. Second, the Biden administration will be taking a patchwork approach to welcoming displaced Ukrainians to the U.S., including the use of nonimmigrant visas—and the exact components of that approach are not yet clear. Combined, these problems are keeping Ukrainians in limbo and complicating America's plans to accept those displaced by the conflict.
"So far in March, the U.S. has admitted a dozen Ukrainians as refugees," reported CBS News' Camilo Montoya-Galvez on March 25, "who were most likely all in the resettlement pipeline long before the Russian invasion, according to internal government data shared with CBS News."
The U.S. refugee resettlement program was already facing staggering backlogs before the conflict in Ukraine, meaning it never had a solid chance at offering quick relief to displaced Ukrainians. Prior to the Trump administration, it took somewhere between 18 and 24 months for refugees to complete the resettlement process. Though the exact post-COVID wait time for U.S. refugee processing is murky, those referred to the "Priority 1" pathway by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees face a wait between two and 10 years.
It's highly likely that conflict-related flight cancellations prevented many Ukrainian refugees cleared to travel to the U.S. from departing the country in March (according to Reuters, the U.S. took in 514 Ukrainian refugees in January and February). The State Department has indicated that refugee operations are now taking place in Chisinau, Moldova, rather than in the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv. "Lawmakers and advocates have urged the Biden administration to accelerate the processing of Ukrainian applications saying too little has been done so far," reports Reuters.
The Biden administration resettled just 11,411 refugees in the U.S. in FY 2021, short of an annual cap of 62,500. The pandemic severely hindered America's refugee processing—officials could not conduct in-person interviews, and key support facilities could not operate normally—and there has been lasting damage from the restrictive refugee policies imposed by the Trump administration. Biden has set the 2022 refugee cap at 125,000, even though he admitted last year that the "goal will still be hard to hit" and "we might not make it the first year."
The reality of refugee caps should indicate that the Biden administration's intention to accept 100,000 Ukrainians is a target, not a binding number. Another sticking point is that not all Ukrainians coming to the U.S. will be refugees in the technical sense of the word—that is, people outside the U.S. who demonstrate they have experienced persecution, are of special humanitarian concern to the United States, and are eligible to access the USRAP through one of three pathways.
Rather, the White House says it will rely on "the full range of legal pathways, including the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program," but perhaps also nonimmigrant options that do not confer the same benefits and logistical support as the USRAP. The Cato Institute's David J. Bier has cautioned that the Biden administration "may even count the 75,000 Ukrainians who will be granted Temporary Protected Status" and "were already in the United States at the time of the invasion" toward the 100,000 goal.
Faced with the slow-moving U.S. refugee program, Ukrainians are looking elsewhere for passage to America—including through the U.S.-Mexico border. Ukrainians do not need to secure a visa before traveling to Mexico (a requirement to enter the U.S.), meaning that thousands have elected to fly from Mexico City to Tijuana and try their luck at entering the U.S. on foot. Last week, the Department of Homeland Security confirmed that about 3,000 Ukrainians were permitted to cross into the U.S. from Mexico. In the past two months, border officials have processed almost 10,000 undocumented Ukrainians. (Critically, these are not refugees, since they did not secure refugee status while they were outside of the U.S.)
It's deeply disappointing that Ukrainians are being forced to navigate such a circuitous process to reach safety in the United States. Their struggle highlights how deeply unprepared the Biden administration was to properly address an emergent migrant crisis and how critical it is for the U.S. immigration system to process refugees and other Ukrainian newcomers with the sense of urgency they deserve.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Ukraine
https://twitter.com/The_Real_Fly/status/1513985315916103681?t=QA3QAEZepxGZVKAUbf0yPw&s=19
*U.S. TO ANNOUNCE ANOTHER $750M IN WEAPONS FOR UKRAINE: REUTERS $LMT
So if a Ukrainian (male) showed up in the US as a refugee, would they be a refugee from Putin even if they fled a part of the country not occupied or even contested by Putin or would they be a refugee from Zelensky who's conscripted them regardless of what part of the country they fled from?
I would say both.
So we grant refugee status to people in unoccupied and uncontested regions?
Good point. It's clear that Zelensky is not interested in a negotiated cease fire and he's gonna need plenty of cannon fodder. If he tries to grab Russian speaking 59 year old men off of the street in Donbass will Fiona come to their rescue? If the people of Donetsk and Luhansk had fled from Ukrainian/NATO aggression a year ago would the Biden Administration welcome them? Fiona admits that the Ukranians currently trying to enter the US were already in the pipeline before the current war with Russia. Are they all automatically refugees now simply because they came from the Ukraine?
Ok, I've got an idea.
We're shipping $750M more worth of supplies over to Ukraine, right?
What if we shipped some illegal immigrants to Ukraine with the equipment to operate it... I bet we could cut a deal with Zelensky to grant them citizenship and possibly even land if they fought on Ukraine's behalf!
I'm seeing this as a Win / Win / Win situation here...
Illegals and Ukraine bots.
Maybe some leftist groomers too.
Oh, Nardz! This could happen to you to, if not from Putin himself, then from his fellow Putineers. No percentage of Putin's take is worth it:
Russia descends into farce as paranoid Putin 'arrests man who invented Putinism'
Pip Cook
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1595496/Russia-news-Vladimir-Putin-Vladislav-Surkov-arrest-Ukraine-war-update-1595496
How many Central American refugees has Poland taken in?
"Pay no attention to the immigration metrics behind the curtain!"
Yeah this is absurd. As the author even says, the US has accepted record Ukrainians through mexico.
Why does the author want refugees here in the US when they are merely seeking refuge from what will likely be a temporary war? These people need to be near their home so they can return and rebuild- unless Russia completely annex's the country- which seems unlikely at this point.
This is the sort of article that "flips the bozo bit" for me with Authors. It proves to me that there is no round data that they won't torture and cram through their square-hole issue. Harrigan is paid to advocate for open borders, and for gods sake, she is going to flush every ounce of credibility down the hole to link that issue to every single current event.
She’s Shreeka without the TDS.
If she will advocate temporary status with an ironclad, no possible extension expiration date, I'll humor her request.
But, as I've said elsewhere, we still have Hondurans on temporary status from a hurricane in 1998.
When I mention abuses of the system, this is one of many examples.
They actually settled 13 Ukrainian refugees but I returned mine after she refused to cook, clean, or provide sexual service. Ah well. Better luck next time.
#SlavaUkraini
That’s why you save the crate for awhile. In case you have to make a return.
We are such failures.
Something must be wrong with Mexico if it's not good enough for refugees from a catastrophic war.
Why would the Dems want more crackers in the country?
Hush. Right now Ukranians are brave freedom fighters and/or victims of right wing fascists (yeah, I know, but Democrats don't). Once the refugees get here and start voting for Trump, we can enjoy the bewildered anguish.
"Once the refugees get here and start voting for Trump"
…if there is a next election.
Even Saddam Hussein had elections. Ours will be as fair as his were.
They need that fig leaf of legitimacy.
They're from a shithole country so they can be relied upon to help the totalitarian left get more power
ICYMI
OpenBordersLiberal-tarian
April.12.2022 at 3:25 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
You know, when Reason.com parted ways with Shikha Dalmia, I wondered if they'd ever find a replacement who could match her commitment to Charles Koch's open borders agenda.
Then Fiona came along. And I can't believe I'm saying this, but Fiona makes Shikha look like a slacker.
When Russia attacked Ukraine?
"The US needs open borders!"
Before Russia attacked Ukraine?
"The US needs open borders!"
The UK does something related to immigration?
"The US needs open borders!"
Bruce Willis was dead at the end of Sixth Sense?
"The US needs open borders!"
She's a machine that uses literally every world event as an excuse to promote her billionaire benefactor's quest for cost-effective labor. And I love it! ????
Two Fiona-bot pieces in one day! Don't wear out the algorithms.
I'm sure the articles could be machine generated.
Look, the flow is really simple.
while ( 1 ) { print "The US needs more immigration!\n"; }
I'm choosing to interpret it -leaning into tony/jeffy/LoS/qa territory, because, she doesn't write anything of the sort, as a plea for immigration reform. An anthem to the plight of the war refugees, feeling, but recognizing that the borders cannot simply be opened willy nilly. I may write a book, call it t he 1917 Project, to re-coin a phrase. About immigration, policy excluding peoples from Asia, East Europe, poorer European nations. Clearly, not important people, since they are not visually pigmented correctly in a way that allows the average affluent liberal educated fuckwit to feel good when engaging in whiteknighting. Fiona may be okay, she could just be young. Or, you may be spot on, OBL.
Lets see, 1292mi to Europe over land or 5601mi to the United States over an ocean...
I don't really care if they become refugee's here in the U.S. or whatever, but lets be honest and note that it's not exactly logical for them to fly halfway around the world or get on a ship for a few weeks to get here.
The honest answer is Europe doesn't want them either, but somehow we're always the bad guy.
What if refugees want to wait to return to their homeland in culturally and linguistically similar areas in Eastern Europe, rather than in an extremely different place like the US?
Not everyone is desperate to travel 9000 miles to drive an Uber in Duluth.
You’re thinking of dudes.
These two, though in Cleveland. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr_pPlCTQDU
I always love the comment section on a Fiona post, it's always such a shit show!
Honk! Honk!
Maybe we should exchange a Ukrainian refugee for you, so you can be at home in superstitious Revanchist Russia.
Fuck Off, Witch-Burner!
Why should I care?
So how many Ukrainians have tried to resettle to the US?
Hey! I remember when the US was trying to get rid of Ukrainians. Walter Polovczak and John Demjanjuk come to mind.
How many have Estonia, Latvia, Moldova, or Lithuania resettled?
Haven't bothered to check here until now, regardless of the irrelevancy of the numbers; figured it to be a nardz tweet fest and a GG 'putinmangood!' bullshit session.
Not so much, but they both keep trying.
Europe can resettle europeans. Putin's Russia is on their doorstep, and they own the local dictator they have ignored at their peril.
The US has its share of regional refugees, and those who have taken advantage of porous borders.
"More than 11% of Mexico's native population lives abroad, making it the country with the most emigrants in the world. 98% of all Mexican emigrants reside in the United States, which are more than 10.9 million (documented and undocumented) migrants."
3.7 million central american refugees as of 2019 (from countries other than Mexico)
(Sources: Data from U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and 2019 American Community Surveys (ACS), and Campbell J. Gibson and Kay Jung, "Historical Census Statistics on the Foreign-Born Population of the United States: 1850-2000" (Working Paper no. 81, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, February 2006), available online.)
Going to take a shot of vodka every time a comment brings up Koch
Whoa, buddy! Liver transplants aren't cheap, you know...
Upon Which US border are these Ukrainian refugees stacking up?
According to the news droves of Ukrainians are coming across our southern border. Don't they get cell phones like the triangle illegals?
It's hardly shocking we're settling few Ukrainian refugees. We're not even on the same CONTINENT as Ukraine; How do those refugees get here without first passing through some safe intermediate country?
Remember, you're only a refugee in the FIRST safe country you reach. When you leave that country, you're just a "migrant".
Don't confuse Fiona by being aware of what the rules are for refugees.
Poland doesn't cut it for them, apparently.
None of this is true.
According to the lived experience of actual people of color, Ukrainian refugees are being welcomed in record numbers and being given more assistance than anyone because they're white.
So tell the REAL story, reason, and fight systemic racism.
The US has resettled a lot more Ukrainian refugees this year than Trump did in four years!
Another win for the Biden administration and something we can all be proud of.
In the UK, single men are desperate to give a home to single Ukrainian women. They are paid by the State to do so, but no doubt the real reason is altruistic. ????
I canceled my subscription to Reason because of its unreasonable support for unrestricted immigration. I see I won’t be renewing it ever… What could go wrong if you let in thousands of so-called refugees from a pissed-poor corrupt country?
Biden doesn’t want Ukrainian refugees.
First off, they are white.
Second, they are Christian.
Third off, they share our Western European cultural values about hard work and family.
They do not champion LGBTQIA’s
So they must not be allowed to enter in any significant numbers.
They are against Theocrat Patriarch Kirill of the Russian Orthodox Church and are better with LGBTQIA+ people than Putin's Russia. They could become even better on these and other issues, but that requires being alive first.